802.1X IAS Switch 3750

Hi,
I am configuring authentication 802.1X in my Access Switchs. The switchs are WS-C3750G-24PS running C3750-IPBASEK9-M, Version 15.0(1)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3). The Radius server is a IAS server, in the IAS there is a Remote Policy with the Windows Group of the users and the atributtes Service Type (Frame), Tunnel-Medium-Type (802), Tunnel-Pvt-Group-ID (100) and Tunnel-Type (Vlan) were configured.
The configuration in a switch is as follow:
aaa new-model
aaa session-id common
aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
aaa authorization network default group radius
radius-server host 192.168.11.28 key 7 093204802934802934123132132123
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23
switchport mode access
authentication event fail retry 5 action authorize vlan 5
authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 5
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication violation protect
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout quiet-period 300
dot1x timeout server-timeout 30
dot1x timeout tx-period 2
dot1x timeout supp-timeout 2
dot1x max-reauth-req 10
dot1x timeout held-period 300
spanning-tree portfast
end
I have these logs, when I connect a workstation with 802.1x configured:
016569: *Mar  2 04:07:37: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/23, changed state to up
016570: *Mar  2 04:07:41: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (2965.0a1d.3431) on Interface Gi1/0/23 AuditSessionID C0A813FD000000CE06090907
016571: *Mar  2 04:07:41: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'timeout' from 'dot1x' for client (2965.0a1d.3431) on Interface Gi1/0/23 AuditSessionID C0A813FD000000CE06090907
016572: *Mar  2 04:07:41: %DOT1X-5-RESULT_OVERRIDE: Authentication result overridden for client (2965.0a1d.3431) on Interface Gi1/0/23 AuditSessionID C0A813FD000000CE06090907
016573: *Mar  2 04:08:09: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (2965.0a1d.3431) on Interface Gi1/0/23 AuditSessionID C0A813FD000000CE06090907
016574: *Mar  2 04:08:09: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'timeout' from 'dot1x' for client (2965.0a1d.3431) on Interface Gi1/0/23 AuditSessionID C0A813FD000000CE06090907
Other show commands:
Switch#show dot1x interface gigabitEthernet 1/0/23 detail
Dot1x Info for GigabitEthernet1/0/23
PAE                       = AUTHENTICATOR
PortControl               = AUTO
ControlDirection          = Both
HostMode                  = SINGLE_HOST
QuietPeriod               = 5
ServerTimeout             = 10
SuppTimeout               = 2
ReAuthMax                 = 10
MaxReq                    = 2
TxPeriod                  = 2
Dot1x Authenticator Client List
EAP Method                = (0)
Supplicant                = 2965.0a1d.3431
Session ID                = C0A813FD000000CF060CE68E
    Auth SM State         = HELD
    Auth BEND SM State    = IDLE
Any idea?
Any suggest?

Hi Matthew,
Please let me know what is the EAP method you are using ? (For eg; PEAP with EAP-MS-CHAPv2 .).
The backend RADIUS server logs should have hint on why the 802.1x failed.
If you are using PEAP with EAP-MSCHAPv2,
1)  make sure whether the certificate on the RADIUS server is fine.
2) check the config in the RADIUS server (reg what EAP methods are allowed ) and check the settings in the supplicant.
3) Make sure that the CA certificate of the RADIUS server is trusted in the supplicant.
4) Check the RADIUS server logs and the logs should give a hint regarding the issue.
If needed, create a case with the respective RADIUS server vendor's TAC.
Regards,
Karthik Chandran

Similar Messages

  • 802.1x between Switch 3750 and ACS 4.2 Authentication faild --need help

    I configured the Switch 3750 and ACS for 802.1x authentication.
    when I used the windows as the 802.1x client, it prompted "click here to enter user name and pasword for the network " as normal.
    The problem is that after I entered username and password (i am sure i enter the identical username and password as in ACS) the authentication failed,
    What is the most possibly problem?
    Thx in advance!!!
    The configuration is Sw3750 is:
    aaa new-model
    aaa authentication login default local
    aaa authentication enable default line
    aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
    aaa authorization network default group radius
    dot1x system-auth-control
    interface GigabitEthernet1/0/18
    description Link to test 802.1x
    switchport access vlan 119
    switchport mode access
    dot1x pae authenticator
    dot1x port-control auto
    spanning-tree portfast
    radius-server host 10.1.1.333 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646
    radius-server source-ports 1645-1646
    radius-server key keepopen0
    In the ACS:
    Network Configuration -->aaa client ip address: 10.1.119.1(the vlan 119's ip address), shared secret: keepopen0
    user setup -->real name:test1, password: test1.
    Attached is the debug information

    What do you see in acs failed attempts?

  • Lwapp capwap AP to act as a supplicant on a 802.1x enabled switch port

    Hi
    All our switchports is configured to validate the connected device with 802.1x
    However when a wireless accesspoint, that is running FlexConnect, is connected I have to make a "mac bypass" on the AP mac addess and add the multihost command to the port config.
    I really like to move away from the mac bypass, but keep the multihost command, and install a certificat on the AP. Have anyone any ideas about how to get the AP itself to auth?

    Hi,
    The AP can act as 802.1x supplicant if it is connected to a 802.1x enabled switch port.
    Cisco unified APs however supports only EAP-FAST as the EAP method.
    Here is a config example, hope it'll be useful.
    http://goo.gl/HMbiHL
    Regards,
    Amjad
    Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

  • Cisco 1252s with regular 802.3af PoE switches - what are the impacts?

    Does anyone have any real-life experience with deploying the 1252s on regular 802.3af PoE switches?  I have a few 1252s one some 3560 PoE ports and the show up with "low power" alarms.
    I am wondering what the real world impact is with this scenario.  The 1252s have both 2.4 Ghz and 5.0 Ghz radios in them and I have HT enabled on the controller.
    I'm wondering what capabilities I am losing by running on 802.3af power besides the annoyance of the alarms.
    Thanks in advance!

    Sorry in advance for the book I have just written.
    I have three 1252s on 75 feet of Cat5e cable running to a 3560 PoE switch. Sometimes, but not always, I see a low power alarm on the access point(s). This is in a small building that is built like a fortress so the RF environment is somewhat challenging. I am watching WCS closely and see all three 2.4 GHz radios powered all the way up to power level 1. I notice that two of the 5GHz radios are on power level 1, and one is on level 3. I thought that RRM would not power anything down until you had at least four access points as RF neighbors. I believe I read that in a Ciscopress book and it seems to be true everywhere in our network when I look at buildings with 3 or less WAPs.
    The building in question does not have any other buildings close by with any 5GHz radios in operation - or at least I didn't see any when I did the survey.
    I'm wondering if the power setting of the radios is also related to the length of the Cat5e cabling. Seems to me a shorter run would have less resistance than longer runs, allowing the radio to have more power.
    My main concern is not this building in question, since we went for coverage and not client density in the design. We several other buildings on the radar, all libraries, which are going to be both RF challenging (bookshelves, furniture, cubicles, cubbies) and client-density challenged. These buildings have hundreds of WLAN clients in them at times - and I mean devices, not just people.
    Someone else told me (reputable source) that channel bonding is not an option when on 802.3af power. Makes sense, actually. I would never even think of bonding in the 2.4 GHz range for obvious reasons, but up in the 5GHz range it is a definate possibility in these buildings. Seems to be that we might be shooting ourselves in the foot by not using 802.3at power in these buildings.
    If channel bonding is disabled and the upper two MCS rates (using 800ns guard interval) of 117 and 130 are disabled, then I'm looking at maximum MCS rate of 104 Mbit/s compared to 270 Mbit/s with 802.3at with channels bonded in the 5GHz range.

  • 802.1x MDA LLDP Disabled on Switch (3750) but detected on phone?

    I have been playing around with 802.1x and some IP phones.  The test senario we have is that LLDP is globally disabled on the switch and enabled on the phone.  When the phone boots up a non-LLDP enabled device is allowed to use the data vlan to boot and learn (via DHCP) the voice vlan.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Security/TrustSec_1-99/IP_Tele/IP_Telephony_DIG.html#pgfId-389460
    We found that if LLDP is disabled on the switch it still detects LLDP on the phone and blocks the LLDP enabled phone from using the data vlan.  This causes the phone to "hang" waiting for DHCP.
    Turning LLDP off on the switch port did not seem to help as the switch tests for LLDP reguardless and then blocks access to the data vlan.  It seems like *if* LLDP is disabled on the switch it should treat all devices as non-LLDP devices and allow the use of the data vlan.  Even if the device (IP Phone) is capable of LLDP.
    Cisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)

    Turned out that this was being caused by not having a valid DATA vlan set (leaving it in vlan 1).  It looks like with MDA you cannot assign the data VLAN the phone will use to boot in a Radius reply.  It has to be assigned manually?
    Is there another way to tell the switch to allow the phone on data vlan 20 for a short period of time?
    interface x/y/z
     switchport access vlan 20
     switchport mode access
     switchport nonegotiate
     switchport voice vlan 60
     switchport port-security maximum 5
     switchport port-security
     switchport port-security aging time 2
     switchport port-security violation restrict
     switchport port-security aging type inactivity
     authentication event fail retry 1 action authorize vlan 20
     authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 20
     authentication host-mode multi-domain
     authentication order mab dot1x
     authentication priority mab dot1x
     authentication port-control auto
     authentication periodic
     authentication timer reauthenticate server
     mab
     snmp trap mac-notification change added
     dot1x pae authenticator
     dot1x timeout quiet-period 3
     dot1x timeout server-timeout 2
     dot1x timeout tx-period 5
     dot1x timeout supp-timeout 2
     spanning-tree portfast

  • 802.1x on Cisco 3750 switch: How to stop retrying the authentication for the un-authorized guests

    Hi experts,
    I'm trying to stop the authentication retry for the guests. They won't have the credential to be authorzied and will be put in the guest VLAN. However the switch seems by default always retries the authentication every 15 seconds or so. It's fine if the guests are few but I'm implementing it at a hotel where most users are guests (like 1000 of them at the same time...).
    I really need to turn it off or at least find some timer to decrease the frenquency... It's urgent because the hotel is about to open... The following is the config I put on an interface:
    switchport access vlan 1055
    switchport mode access
    switchport nonegotiate
    switchport voice vlan 657
    ip access-group ACL_PortIso_IDF21 in
    authentication event fail action authorize vlan 1055
    authentication event no-response action authorize vlan 1055
    authentication host-mode multi-domain
    authentication port-control auto
    authentication violation protect
    mab
    no snmp trap link-status
    dot1x pae authenticator
    dot1x timeout quiet-period 300
    dot1x timeout tx-period 2
    dot1x timeout supp-timeout 2
    dot1x max-reauth-req 10
    dot1x timeout held-period 300
    no cdp enable
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    no ip igmp snooping tcn flood
    Thanks!

    Elly,
    Soon I will have a Windows laptop plugged in. Then I will be able to run the wireshark. Now I have to run the "debug dot1x packets" since the attached device is a phone.
    So first I "clear dot1x session int f3/0/13". After a couple of "failure" eventually it will show this:
    "%AUTHMGR-5-SUCCESS: Authorization succeeded for client (Unknown MAC) on Interface Fa3/0/13"
    (Weird... why it's showing "success"? Anyway when the authentication restarts again after several minutes there won't be any "sucess" any more, as shown in my previous text file. They are)
    Then I have the debug turnned on:
    .Jan 25 12:47:21: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'dot1x' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    INDJWSW01-2104#
    .Jan 25 12:47:21: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    .Jan 25 12:47:21: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    .Jan 25 12:47:21: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    .Jan 25 12:47:21: dot1x-packet(Fa3/0/13): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x5600009F (0019.f302.a378)
    INDJWSW01-2104#
    .Jan 25 12:47:23: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    .Jan 25 12:47:23: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    .Jan 25 12:47:23: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    .Jan 25 12:47:23: dot1x-packet(Fa3/0/13): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x5600009F (0019.f302.a378)
    INDJWSW01-2104#
    .Jan 25 12:47:25: EAPOL pak dump Tx
    .Jan 25 12:47:25: EAPOL Version: 0x3  type: 0x0  length: 0x0005
    .Jan 25 12:47:25: EAP code: 0x1  id: 0x1  length: 0x0005 type: 0x1
    .Jan 25 12:47:25: dot1x-packet(Fa3/0/13): EAPOL packet sent to client 0x5600009F (0019.f302.a378)
    INDJWSW01-2104#
    .Jan 25 12:47:27: %DOT1X-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:27: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'no-response' from 'dot1x' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:27: %AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'dot1x' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    INDJWSW01-2104#
    .Jan 25 12:47:27: %AUTHMGR-5-START: Starting 'mab' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:28: %MAB-5-FAIL: Authentication failed for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:28: %AUTHMGR-7-RESULT: Authentication result 'fail' from 'mab' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:28: %AUTHMGR-7-FAILOVER: Failing over from 'mab' for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    .Jan 25 12:47:28: %AUTHMGR-7-NOMOREMETHODS: Exhausted all authentication methods for client (0019.f302.a378) on Interface Fa3/0/13 AuditSessionID 0A8F7325000010629B960A41
    Then the message will repeat and repeat forever... It seems that the switch Tx the packets first... Any ideas???
    Thanks!

  • 802.1x authentication switch and AD

    Hello,
    I want to know if Cisco has solved the problem (MD5) between ACS and Active Directory?? because I want to configure 802.1x in a switch and it will integrate with Active Directory (Data Base)
    The Solution is:
    Switch <--> ACS (Authentication)<--> AD (Data Base)
    Also i want to know if exist any solution no NAC Appliance that can use 802.1x integrate with AD in switch infraestructure??
    Best Regards

    I have hit the same challenge, where I need to authenticate the users against AD and I don't want to use the local CiscoSecure Database in ACS. For hundreds of users, there is no way I'm going to manage a database in ACS for user access. I have to manage the users in AD. I opened a case with Cisco and MS-CHAP is not supported by Cisco ACS, as I was provided this URL link:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_server_for_windows/3.3/user/guide/o.html#wpxref846
    Additionally, I was directed to the URL: http://www.ciscotaccc.com/kaidara-advisor/security/showcase?case=K24308566
    I'm so stuck...there has to be way to use IEEE 802.1x with an external database such as LDAP.

  • RADIUS failover not working in wired 802.1x (CATOS switch)

    I am setting up a pilot group for wired 802.1x testing. I have it working correctly on a C2950 and C3550s. I am having trouble with the RADIUS failover on my CATOS C4006 series switches. When I disable the primary RADIUS Server to test failover, the switch never fails over to the backup RADIUS server and thus wired 802.1x fails. Am I missing something?
    Any help is appreciated. Here is my config:
    #version 8.4(7)GLX
    #radius
    set radius server 10.30.XX.XX auth-port 1812 primary
    set radius server 10.18.XX.XX auth-port 1812
    set radius timeout 30
    set radius key EE08361
    Set dot1x system-auth-control enable
    set port dot1x 5/27 port-control auto
    all radius and dot1x settings are at their default values
    Any takers??!

    I have the same setup as yours. I use Steelbelt
    radius 6.0.1 on Linux and I have Cisco 2960
    catalyst. I use 802.1x over Ethernet with
    PEAP, as seen below:
    C2960#sh run int g0/23
    Building configuration...
    Current configuration : 133 bytes
    interface GigabitEthernet0/23
    switchport mode access
    dot1x pae authenticator
    dot1x port-control auto
    dot1x guest-vlan 668
    end
    C2960#
    C2960#sh run | inc dot
    aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
    dot1x system-auth-control
    dot1x guest-vlan supplicant
    C2960#sh run | inc radius-
    radius-server host 192.168.15.10 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key xxx
    radius-server host 10.250.97.26 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key xxx
    C2960#
    Everything works and when I shutdown the
    radius server process on host 192.168.15.10,
    "sbrd stop", it still works with the secondary
    radius server 10.250.97.26.
    The difference between yours and mine is that
    I am running IOS instead of CatOS.
    System image file is "flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-25.SEE4.bin"
    David

  • 802.1x with Switch SRW2024-Web

    Hi@all,
    i want to implement a port based NAC with Windows Server 2008 NPS acting as RADIUS and some Linksys/Cisco SRW2024 - WebView Switches, using EAPoL and MD5-Auth.
    (SRW2024: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps9989/index.html)
    I am able to authenticate any Supplicant and open the port on the switch. But i've a probem with de VLAN-ID.
    I only wan't to authenticate the user on the Switch-Port. All incoming traffic is unttaged an the Switch should tag the frames with configured PVID in Access Mode. But the switch doesn't either tag with configured PVID nor tag with the RADIUS-attributs:
    Tunnel-Type -> VLAN
    Tunnel-Medium-Type -> 802
    Tunnel-Privat-Group-ID -> <VLAN-ID>
    anyone an idea, what i'm doing wrong?

    Well, i don't understand the world anymore....after the switch was accepting the radius-attributes,
    i removed the radius-attributes again...since that, the configured PVID in access-mode are working also.
    sometimes these switches driving me crazy.

  • 802.1x caused Switch to hang - Memory too low

    Hi all,
    Anyone experienced this before while turning on flex authentication (802.1x, MAB, Web Auth), causing the switch too hang. When the switch hang, I can't even telnet to switch or even console into the switch. The message I am getting from the console is "Memory too low, please try again later".
    It happens weeks after 802.1x was enable on the switch, can anyone share their experience on this? Thanks.

    Any luck with this??
    We have quite a few 4500's doing the same thing.

  • 802.1X on switch 2950

    Hi,
    I tried to configure 802.1X on a 2950 switch, i can't connect from a pc.
    That's what i did on:
    * ACS
    aaa client ip IP_Switch
    authenticate : radius (ietf)
    key : xxxxx
    a certificate has been created on a ca server and installed on the acs (on same machine, i choose "use certificate from storage")
    * WIN XP
    Type EAP : PEAP
    Secured password : EAP-MSCHAP V2
    * SWITCH
    aaa authentication dot1x default group radius
    interface fastethernet0/1
    switchport mode access
    dot1x port-control auto
    radius-server host IP_ACS auth-port 1645 key xxxxx
    I created user (same as used for logging on the client) on ACS, i always get "authentication failed"

    Hello stephen,
    Is the IP communication between the switch and the radius server fine ? Is the radius server on a seperate segment ? Once u have this setup, u just need to define the username/password on the radius server and see if authenticates thro the switch. do a debug aaa authentication, debug dot1x events/packets etc to see what happens when the user logs in !!!
    configs:
    aaa new-model
    aaa authentication dot1x default group radius local
    dot1x system-auth-control
    dot1x guest-vlan supplicant
    interface FastEthernet1/0/47
    switchport access vlan 777
    switchport mode access
    dot1x port-control auto
    dot1x timeout tx-period 15
    dot1x guest-vlan 10
    dot1x reauthentication
    spanning-tree portfast
    ip dhcp snooping trust
    If authentication phase passes, the user will be put in VLAN 777. if there is any guest plugging into this PC, without a dot1x client, he will be put on guest vlan 10..
    Hope this helps.. all the best. rate replies if found useful..
    Raj

  • VoIP configure on edge switch 3750

    Greeting
    I am testing no cisco phone on 3750:
    interface FastEthernet1/0/6
    description testing
    switchport access vlan 100
    switchport mode access
    switchport voice vlan 101
    switchport port-security maximum 2
    switchport port-security
    switchport port-security aging time 2
    switchport port-security violation restrict
    switchport port-security aging type inactivity
    srr-queue bandwidth share 10 10 60 20
    srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0
    priority-queue out
    mls qos trust dscp
    auto qos voip cisco-phone
    macro description cisco-phone
    spanning-tree portfast
    spanning-tree bpduguard enable
    service-policy input AutoQoS-Police-CiscoPhone
    end
    and found that "switchport port-security"
    will drop the phone's dhcp discovery packets.
    When phone first time power on, it can get ip address from dhcp server; but, when you log out from current phone number, and the phone start to get ip address from dhcp again, the switch will drop the dhcp discover packets which the phone used to communicate with dhcp server.
    I tried to increase max number to 6 (switchport port-security maximum 2) but it is not useful.
    I did show port-security int command, and there is only one mac address on the interface.
    I have also checked the mac address, and I can not see any violated to the security rules.
    Could any one advice me:
    - what the cause ?
    - how can I debug it?
    - if possible to fix it without disable the port security?
    Any comments will be appreciated
    thanks in advance

    Great thanks for the reply, I have found the problem. the problem is the "switchport port-security aging time" has to be lower than 2. I have set it to 1 min.
    Another question, we have been asked to set qos trust dscp, as:
    mls qos trust dscp
    can I get advice, if it will cause the workstation (PC/server) which plug into this port to get high priority treatment?
    Please advice.
    Many Regards

  • CISCO SWITCH 3750 IP ACCOUNTING

    Hi Everyone
    Can anyone tell me if the ip accounting is support in the 3750 switch.
    Switch Ports Model              SW Version            SW Image                 
    *    1 26    WS-C3750-24P       12.2(55)SE9           C3750-IPBASEK9-M 
    The switch accept the command but when I executed show ip accountig don´t show me anything.
    The command is configured under the VLAN interface and it´s the default gateway of that VLAN.
    interface Vlan199
     description RED DE GESTION
     ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224
     no ip redirects
     no ip unreachables
     ip accounting output-packets
     no ip mroute-cache
    end
    BOG-AME-CORE-C3750-24Px1#show ip accounting 
       Source           Destination              Packets               Bytes
    Accounting data age is 0

    Hey Peter,
    Looks like its an unsupported command for 3750, see the link:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750e_3560e/software/release/12-2_55_se/configuration/guide/3750escg/swuncli.html
    HTH.
    Regards,
    RS.

  • VoIP with Switch 3750

    Hi,
    I have a doubt. The company wants to implement VoIP, but the core switches are Cisco 3750. Is it possible to implement it with these switches?.
    Any experience in this task will be appreciate it.
    Thanks
    Wladimir

    Well Wladimir,
    you could implement it in one step or in several steps. It depends on several parameters I do not know, like time frame, staff, size, maintainance windows, etc.
    Be aware that implementing VoIP will most likely require QoS on at least the trunk ports and all ports, where VoIP traffic is passing.
    VLAN implementation would be the base for any traffic, So I would make sure to design and implement rapid spanning tree per VLAN first.
    Make sure the root bridges are selected carefully. Test failure scenarios.
    Increasing the number of VLANs should not pose any problem, so this could be an ongoing process, while you plan your VoIP implementation.
    VoIP needs a LOT more than just switch design. Have a look at the VoIP SRND (www.cisco.com/go/srnd). If you have no experience with setting up VoIP get professional help, if your budget allows it. Make sure your staff is properly trained to support the new network.
    Just a few recommendations to get you onto the right track - I still might miss some important points, as I do not know your requirements and network in great detail.
    Hope this helps nevertheless. Please use the rating system.
    Regards, Martin

  • Etherchannel between stack switches[3750] and standalone switch[3560]

    Hi,
    I have 2*3750 switches in stack as core and 1*3560 switch in access layer. I want to enable ether channel between stack switch[3750A & 3750B] and 3560 switches.
    Have connected  2 links from 3560 switch to stack switch, one link to 3750A and other link to 3750B. Will it work in this way as per my requirement? 
    or i should enabled stacking on 3560 switch too and configure cross-stack ether channel between 3750 stack and 3560 stack. i refered few cisco documents, but the cross stack etherchannel configuration example has 3750 at both end stacks.
    Rgds...
    VikramS

    Hi,
     This should work fine as per you set up, the 3750 stack will be acting as one switch, which means that the ether-channel configuration should be straight forward. There is no need to stack the 3560 for this to work, also the 3560 are not stackable.
    Hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • For Each Loop Issue In SSIS

    Hi All, I have a SSIS Package which unzips the folder and then imports the files and then moves *.zip folders into processed location. If this task is executed as a part of total package its not moving the *.zip folders into processed location, but w

  • Moving instead of copying files from my camera

    When I use Lightroom to move photos from my camera to my computer, I want it to automatically delete the copied files from my camera. How do I do this?

  • Im trying to update my iphone but it says must connect to wifi

    Im cconnected to  the internet and trying to update the software on my iphone but it says it needs wifi connection - but Im connected??

  • Mysql syntax error

    Hi, I am trying to run the following query with JDBC. It works perfectly when done through a normal mysql admin tool but not with JDBC Apparently the error is on the last line. Do you guys know why? Cheers. CREATE TABLE archive (   ar_namespace int(1

  • BI administration docs from BASIS perspective

    Hi All,   I want one help from all of you as we have started using BI from last few days. And as we are from BASIS team so we have to monitor that BI system. So please let me know that is there any document that I can refer to understand that what I