975x PowerUp modified version

After searching in the web for some new 975x PowerUp review, I've found one for the modified version, that has heat pipes !!:
http://www.3dprofessor.org/Reviews%20Folder%20Pages/MSI975X%20&%20965/975&965P2.htm
what do you think ?

I have no idea. I know for sure that haven't seen or heard anything about a special edition of either board here in Germany yet.
Quote from: papubhai on 28-February-07, 12:04:42
looks like a joke dude
The only really interesting thing is the difference in cooling efficiency:
For the 975X PLatinum PUE modified Version/limited Edition:
http://www.3dprofessor.org/Reviews%20Folder%20Pages/MSI975X%20&%20965/975&965P3.htm
Northbridge temperature difference: 1.4-4.8°C
Southbridge temperature difference: 0.7-4.9°C

Similar Messages

975x powerup

I have read and learned a lot from this forum. Now I have some questions. I am either able to overclock my processor, or set my memory to be recognized as being 800 instead of the default 667. I am able to clock my 2.4gig c2duo to about 2.8 if I allow my memory to be run at 667. As soon as I set the voltage to 1.5, I am not able to overclock my processor at all. The system will not even get to the MSI splash screen.
I would like to be able to over clock my processor AND have my memory recognized for what it is. I am of average knowledge at best , so please bear with me.
My system
Intel 2.4 C2Duo
MSI 975x platinum PowerUp Bios version 7.4
Kingston hyperX 2x1 DDR2 800 PC 6400 4-4-4-12
Nvidia 8800GTS (just one so far)
320gb maxtor HD
Liteon Lightscribe DVD rw x 2
Windows XP Pro (32 bit)
Xion Hydraulic XON case
550W Xion power supply

Quote from: locateroy on 14-April-07, 10:52:37
I have read and learned a lot from this forum. Now I have some questions. I am either able to overclock my processor, or set my memory to be recognized as being 800 instead of the default 667. I am able to clock my 2.4gig c2duo to about 2.8 if I allow my memory to be run at 667. As soon as I set the voltage to 1.5, I am not able to overclock my processor at all. The system will not even get to the MSI splash screen.
I would like to be able to over clock my processor AND have my memory recognized for what it is. I am of average knowledge at best , so please bear with me.
My system
Intel 2.4 C2Duo
MSI 975x platinum PowerUp Bios version 7.4
Kingston hyperX 2x1 DDR2 800 PC 6400 4-4-4-12
Nvidia 8800GTS (just one so far)
320gb maxtor HD
Liteon Lightscribe DVD rw x 2
Windows XP Pro (32 bit)
Xion Hydraulic XON case
550W Xion power supply
The memory speed settings in bios are not absolute values but dividers
The 533 Mhz option means FSB:RAM 1:1
The 667 Mhz option means FSB:RAM 4:5
The 800 Mhz option means FSB:RAM 2:3
When you run your FSB at stock speed of 266 Mhz you'll see the RAM runs at 533,667 or 800 mhz for each divider (just calculate)...
But when you raise your FSB, ram will raise along with it according to the divider
So, if you set your FSB to 311 Mhz (for 2800Mhz CPU speed) and memory on the 800Mhz divider then actually your ram will be running 466 Mhz (933 DDR) wich is too high for your 800Mhz ram
Leave it on the 667Mhz divider, for 311Mhz FSB that'll make the ram run 388 Mhz (777 DDR)
If you take your FSB beyond 320Mhz you'll need to switch to the 533Mhz divider to keep ram below 800Mhz
Start overclocking with Vcore at stock and only bump Vcore when you seem to have reached the maximum - Don't overdo it tho, 1.5V is really to high for normal overclocking - it's more for extremists with water cooling. Also when you reach a wall, calculate to check if you're not running ram to fast, if not - lower your CPU multiplier AND the ram divider to test if you've hit the max of your board.

975X PowerUp - Possible to use Intel Raid and JMicron Controller?

Hi,
as you can see I've got an MSI 975X PowerUp Edition with Bios 7.7.
Because of many problems I had with earlier Bios version I've got completely disabled the JMicron controller in the Bios.
I'm running 4 HDDs at the Intel controller while using 2x Raid0.
Is it now possible to use the JMicron at the same time?
I would like to add a fifth SATA HDD at the JMicron controller and aybe an old IDE HDD also on the JMicron controller. So, is it possible?

Quote from: carrera1988 on 19-January-08, 18:48:17
Sorry, didn't found that thread.
I've tried it now with an fifth Sata HDD, works perfekly until now. I'm formating the new HDD at the moment...
What's the best way to shut down the Intel controller WITHOUT the risk of loosing data?
I want that oly the new HDD is detected so I can use her for testing purposes...
If only for testing purposes, why did you leave raid connected........? Especially, if planning to alter boot sequence......
I turn off computer and unplug disks, when I am doing testing of HD's......... that way data is safe. You have to setup bios again after testing but only takes a few mins or 10 mins if you have written down settings

Core2Quad Q6600 on MSI 975X PowerUp Edition problem

Hello. I have a problem that is bugging me for about one month.
I have this configuration with an Intel Core2Quad Q6600 on a MSI 975X PowerUp Edition mainboard, with 4G Ram memory from Kingmax (4x1G DDRII 800 MHz) <The mainboard has the latest bios version 7.7>. I am running on Windows Vista x64 OS and I always get a blue screen after a nonequal period of time. I have remarked that usually it happens when running a media file (e.g. movie, DVD, play mp3) and downloading something from the internet. If I only do one type of operation at a time nothing happens, but if I do both types in the same time... in crashes. I can't figure out what may be the problem I've ran 32 memtests (one with v1.70 and one with v3.4) on each memory on each slot (4 memories x 4 slots) and got no errors. Of course than I ran one single test with both versions of memtest with the full 4G installed and got a lot of errors only on test 8 of them (regardless of the relevancy of 4G on a memtest that is on 32bit).
I also gave a memory test from the Windows Vista x64 DVD and the system hangs at 37% for hours. I checked the HDD and has no problem.... Now I don't know what else to test anymore in order to see what may be the problem. Is it somehow a problem from the processor?, any incompatibility in the system?
I saw that when making the regular updates for windows, on one particular update the system crashes giving me the same BSOD that bugs me (note thet the system does this problem imediatly after a clean install with no updates, and after the updates are installed)
I've installed windows about 5 or 6 times on this configuration. Not once crashed or hanged during installation and in windows... in applications, never hanges or crashes into the same applications... they work just fine... only when I am using some media and downloading.... it happens at a total random time between a few minutes and even one hour. Sometimes if I am lucky I watch an entire movie while downloading and nothing happens... I just don't get it.
Ah.. and when I get BSODs it never is the same error. Or it's a memory adress (stop error 0x0029940<random at adress 0x41625753<random), or it's a win32.sys, or it's a ntfs.sys, or some other file stored in windows directory.
Please tell me what should I try? any DOS or Windows programs that may stress the CPU in order to see if it's OK please just help me somehow, any ideea will be good.
I wonder if anyone from MSI could give me a hint or at least tell me about a software they use currently in order to debug a MB problem (if t's possible to do so).
Thanks

Same problems here.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=112892.0

Is it possible to change iWork files on your iMac without having to upload the modified version to iCloud and downloading it again for the next use ?

Recently I am getting more and more familiar with Numbers, Pages, KeyNote and I have to acknowledge they look smart in many aspects compared to Office for Mac programs ( ..only a bit of time to learn some minor things..). But what really surprises me is that while shifting from MobileMe to ICloud, Apple is not providing a real , full-service, cloud-computing platform for those who , like me, makes use of it mostly for work or business purposes.. I mean, you can do whatever from your Ipad or Iphone ( besides clearly ignoring the necessity one may build up folders with any kind of file in it, not just one categoory..) and every file you manage from these mobile devices, get saved and stored in the new modified version.. But try doing the same form your Imac or McBook Air and you wil have to download from Icloud your file, work on it and having to re-upload onto Icloud back again ==> syncing is not authomatic as it used to be by Idisk in MobileMe !!.. A real nightmare for those who work with Apple, in my opinion.
One last thing.. I am having trouble at dragging and dropping PDF files onto Icloud, doesn't accept its format.. Although PDF files are mentioned as acceptable at Pages , for example...
I can't see the reasons for all this.. At first I thought this was all being done in order to move more and more users from Windows office to IWork programs, if it were for this, I'd be keen on changing, also because I love Iworks programs.. But I found out it's not !.. Unless people at Apple think that all business driven users of former MobileMe should quit their Imac and start working 8-10 hrs a day with the Ipad :-) !!
No fear, I know there are plenty of cloud-computing services doing the same as IDisk, but I can't understand why Apple has given so little attention to such needs, that , I guess, are probably the same by many other Mac users..
Thankful for any help-support-opinion on this,
Maurizio

m,
You can submit Feedback to Apple from the Numbers menu. That's the official channel for comments about the app and suggestions for improvement. The Apple officials don't visit these discussions except to maintain the decorum.
Jerry

Iphoto 08 won't export modified version

Hi!
I'm having some real trouble here. I modify my photos in iPhoto, but when I export the pics, it exports the ORIGINAL version, not the modified version.
I've even gone into the iPhoto library package and found the 'Modified' folder for my photos, and they're the SAME as well! I have NO idea what is going on here. The only copy of the actually modified photos that I can find is the thumbnails in the 'Data' folder inside the iPhoto library package.
Any ideas??
Thanks so much!

paxrasmussen:
Welcome to the Apple Discussions. Are you able to get the modified version if you just drag from the thumbnail to the desktop? Or is it not working that way as well as the File->Export method?
Try rebiulding the library as follow: launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys depressed and follow the instructions to rebuild the library. Select the option to rebuild just the database.
Happy New Year
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

IPad 2 running unauthorized modified version. What does it mean, and how can I solve this problem?

I get a message that my iPad is running an unauthorized modified version, even though I'm currently running 4.3.3. What does it mean, and how can I solve this problem? Please help, i ve tried everything. Thanks

I bought my iPad 2 three months ago from apple, and all my updates re from apple through iTunes. Version 4.3.3 is the latest version I updated, have been trying hard to update 4.35 but I get error messages all the time when the update is almost complete. Everything was working beautifully since I bought it, but this update problem just cropped up last week. I need a way out pls.

Saving original and modified versions

Hey all,
Can someone tell me how to stop iphoto from saving both an original and modified version of my photos? It's very confusing when I try to access the photos to upload onto flickr, or to burn dvds etc.
I can't believe how much time I've wasted on this program--and now have had to start all over from scratch.
LH

Hello.
You do have a choice. Use a file browser. There are many available. They let you simply store the photos on your hard drive, in your folders, how you want them. Easy.
Why does iPhoto behave as it does? Because it offers much more complex features than any file browser. iPhoto is not a file browser. It is a database application with non-destructive editing. You import a photo. iPhoto creates a thumbnail version, linked to your original, for efficient presentation of your library on screen. You edit, and it creates a full-sized copy, which you then modify. It keeps track of the edited version, linked to your original. Your thumbnail is also located and updated to match the edited version. If you ever wish to go back, you can always Revert to Original. The edited version will be deleted, and your thumbnail will again reflect the change. All before you can blink your eyes.
So, yes, the way to get your files for uploading or burning to DVD is to select from iPhoto, then export. Because iPhoto will be sure to export the full-sized, most recent version of your photos. You never need to root around its library folders to find them yourself. Exporting gives you the additional ability to rename the copies. And, even better, to resize the copies, since smaller files work better for viewing on most websites. After you finish with the upload you can trash the exported copies.
Then consider the Albums and Folders in your Source Pane. With a file browser, you'd have to duplicate your files to display them in more than one album (because album = folder). With iPhoto's database, albums never create duplication; they are virtual arrangements which have no presence in your folder structure. The benefit - you can have a photo in 100 albums, with very little increase to the size of your library.
Play with other search features, and iPhoto becomes very powerful indeed. Smart Albums can be created to compile photos based on many criteria, and they stay current with your library. With the calendar tool you can pull up photos from any year, month, and/or date with just a few clicks. Keywords can be used to include or eliminate (Option-click a keyword) groups of photos until you have just the grouping you want. [Ex: I can find all photos of my daughter, with my in laws, at a festival, NOT at Christmas, with animals....]
It is a shift in thinking to leave the iPhoto Library alone and let iPhoto deal with the file management. As long as it works, why does it matter how it's done? You have all of its tools at your disposal.

How to delete modified version datasource

I have a datasource in M version and A version. I am getting datasource activation error in BI 7.0
Please let me know how to delete Modified version.
Thanks
Liza

I removed a field from LO datasource 2LIS_11_VAITM , activated, tested successfully in R/3.
I replicated the datasource successfully in BW. But when activate the data source I am getting short dump ST22 ,the error message is " The ASSERT condition was violated". I am BI 7.0.
BW side in datasouece I found a not equal to sign ( which means M version is not equal to A version) and datasource is inactive.
ST22 -
Short text
    The ASSERT condition was violated.
Error analysis
    The following checkpoint group was used: "No checkpoint group specified"
    If in the ASSERT statement the addition FIELDS was used, you can find
    the content of the first 8 specified fields in the following overview:
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
    " (not used) "
Thanks
Liza

Is it possible to recover an original pdf document from a modified version??

I received a court document in pdf thats internal content was modified, is it in anyway possible to recover the original from the modified version?

It is possible they did a quick save to preserve the file identity, the metadata shows the program used was to modify the document was 'tx11 pdf version 11.0.111.501. Are either of you familiar with such a program?
I am on xp, when I right click properties there is a separate pdf tab. Indicating: The file was created jan 2012 and modified August 2013. The pdf producer is tx11 pdf 11.0.111.501.
I had a friend of a friend look at it and he said "the content was modified, not the file container itself, August 1st 2013, 5:13 a.m. according to its meta data the modification was made by tx11 pdf version 11.0.111.501". He gave me a printout of the metadata but I dont know the program used.
Whats interesting is the modification date is the same in pdf properties tab but the modification time is 9 am a 4 hour difference. 5 am is before office hours 9 am is shortly after arriving. The august date was a week after a court order.
So it is possible the file was taken home modified then replaced on the office computer. I am suspecting by a paralegal.

LR HTML Web Gallery -- modified version with great features is available

For anyone using the default Lightroom HTML Web Gallery, one of our associates here has offered a modified version with some great added features.
John Beardsworth's site -- Lightroom Solutions - http://lightroomsolutions.com/ -- is a wonderful resource for LR tips, plug-ins, information, etc.
The default HTML gallery is fine, but I always found it lacked features. I mentioned this to Ian Lyons (http://www.computer-darkroom.com/) a couple of years ago, and he sent me a modified version with the ability to specify up to 100 rows by using sliders instead of the grid. When I tried John's modified version, it had some other good features. I thought.... what if the two modified versions could be combined? So, I shot John an email, and low and behold, he uploaded a new version of the gallery to his site. Thank you, Ian and John!
Here is the link:
http://lightroomsolutions.com/my-tweaked-built-in-html-gallery/
Here are the added features that I find most useful:
Number of rows (up to 100) and columns can be specified using sliders rather than the grid
Thumbnail images can be sized to your specification
Filename can be placed on each thumbnail, and you specify size of text
Clicking the large image advances to the next image rather than returning to the top of the thumbnail page (no need to use the 'next' link)
See the site for other added features. (If you already have John's version, the newer version has the same file name and went online April 17, 2013.)
PLEASE NOTE: John Beardsworth's HTML gallery is NOT supported by John or Adobe, and is offered "as-is."
I hope others will find this as useful and I have.
John

I've done a version of this where the large file links to the medium and it works no problem. code is based on tutorial code I've already written..
I'd need to see more code to see where the issue might be..
Here's what I have:
(I opted not to put the files in "content", also ignore margin-top, it's not relevent to this)
AddGridPages {
template='grid.html',
rows=model.nonCSS.numRows,
columns=model.nonCSS.numCols,
AddCustomCSS {
filename='resources/css/custom.css',
AddResources {
source='resources',
destination='resources',
AddPhotoPages {
template='detail.html',
variant='_large',
destination="",
AddPhotoPages {
    template='medium.html',
    variant='_medium',
    destination="",
In medium.html
<div id="detailContainer">
<div style="margin-top:<%= margintop %>px;">
<img src="bin/images/med/<%= image.exportFilename %>.jpg" alt="$image.metadata.description"/></div>
</div>
in detail.html
<div id="detailContainer">
<div style="margin-top:<%= margintop %>px;">
<a href="<%= image.exportFilename %>_medium.html"><img src="bin/images/photo/<%= image.exportFilename %>.jpg" alt="$image.metadata.description"/></a></div>
</div>

Modified version of the GL2DW extension

Hi everyone (and especially MenuMachine users),
After looking at the problems on this forum I have looked at the code of the GL2DW extension and have modified/fixed it in a couple of ways in order to address some issues:
1) the extension is now tolerant of any errors copying components or templates. If these errors occur, you will still see an error message but the conversion process will not abort. The extension will also use the Library folder if it can't find the Snippets folder.
2) the extension will no longer modify any MenuMachine code. This is important if you are still using MenuMachine to manage your menus in the converted site.
I have posted the patched extension here:
http://menumachine.com/download/GL2DW.zip
Hopefully this helps many of you.
As far as I can tell there is no official license or copyright notice for the GL2DW software so I think it's OK for me to post a modified version. If anyone at Adobe objects please contact me directly at [email protected] and hopefully we can work something out.

I was giving the GL2DW extension a try while trying to write up a step-by-step tutorial, and ran into a problem. Does the extension (this one, or the original from Adobe) not allow for editable template content in the head section? I know DW assumes the whole head section is locked unless an editable region is defined, but GoLive assumes the head section is editable, with head locked regions defined instead.
If I export a site from GL to DW, then make a change to a template file, the page-specific head content is lost. Is that the case for others too? Page-specific head content isn't supported?
If that's the case, the best solution I've come up with involves a relatively complex find and replace that gets rid of the head lock comments and wraps head editable comments around any head content above and below the template's head content. Seems like a pretty big problem though that could result in losing a good bit of site code if you weren't looking for it.

More modified versions of one object in BW

Hello,
is it possible to save more modified versions of any object in BW(InfoObject, InfoCube,...) and then activate one of them? I know it is possible by ABAP programs, but in BW?
Example: I want to try some settings. But if they are wrong, I have to change it back manually. If I could save the old version and restore later it would be very helpful.
Thanks for your answer!
Regards,
Radek

Ahoj Radek,
BW has no such a sophisticated version-ing system as common ABAP/DDIC objects are having.
This is still area for improvement. Hope people in SAP AG are aware of that.
Also I'm not aware of any 3rd party custom tool that would allow that.
Field RSOBJVERS used mostly in all BW tables for identifying version of objects can have only following values, so this is a limit as well:
A     Active
M     Revised
N     New
D     Content
H     Historic
T     Transport
BR
m./

Modified version is differant from active for ds in test system

Modified version is differant from active version in test system for ds 0FI_AA_12 (unequal sign close to ds).
Once I try to load data to PSA , the system generates the following error :
ds is not replicated
I replicated ds many times , re-transported it but nothing helps

Hi,
After you replicate the datasource,it will become inactive and so you need to activate it again.
Always replicate first and then activate.
Hope it clarifies

Activation of datasource :Error modified version

Hi All , Change icon is greyed out is there any program that i can run to activate the real estate datasource. or what is the other way to fix it
1. i activated the datasource in rsa5
2. it comes in rsa6
3. then in bi 7.0 i replicate the datasource but it shows modified version and change and activate button is greyed out.
please help me asap since its a BMW first deliverable and all my datasoources are in modified version. Kindly help
thanks
Soniya Kapoor

Hi, I've seen this problem before. I deleted the datasource in BW and then replicated again.
Regards
Dave

975x PowerUp modified version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for