A crosstab scenario

I am trying to replicate an access pivot table in crystal using the cross tab feature. This is my requirment.
customer   Rep   a         b             c           d          e          f
                        date      date        date      date      date    date
a                      date1    date4
                        date 2
                        date 3
b                      date 5     date 6   date 7    date 8
                        date 9    date 10
c
d
The customer is arranged in rows and Rep is arranged in columns. So i have got the intial layout. However how can i get the dates to be displayed? ( These are not summarized). For eg, there are can be 5 different dates associated to a Rep for a single customer. I need to get this displayed in a tabular format for all the customers and Rep. Can this be leveraged in crystal?
Thanks
Vin
Edited by: Vinnie_uic on Sep 30, 2010 9:24 AM
Edited by: Vinnie_uic on Sep 30, 2010 9:25 AM

Insert the "Date" field into the row section of your crosstab. Make it the second at the row level.
Achett13

Similar Messages

How to create a drill down in crosstab?

Hi All,
I have created a crosstab in CRXI repoprt. Now I'm trying to create a drill down in it. The crosstab is very simple.
Data in table is as:
SUBJECT   DATE    YIELD PCT
Browser   04/11    78.90
Radio     04/13    90.00
HTTP      04/22    89.09
Browser   04/15    90.09
HTTP      04/15    100.00
Radio     04/15    100.00
CROSSTAB Data:
                Browser   HTTP     Radio
04/11           78.90      0        0
04/13            0         0        90.00
04/15           90.09     100.00    100.00
04/22            0         89.09     0
Columns are "SUBJECT" and Rows are "DATE" and I have taken "Max of Yield PCT" as Summation field.
Now If I click on Yeild_PCT data in crosstab, it should drill down. I have created a drill down as Another report. I have tried FormatObject>Hyperlink>"Another Report Object". Copied the yield_PCT column from source report & pasted in "Another Report Object" but it is not working.
Really appreciate any help.
Thanks in Advance.

if you're trying to use drill-down in cross-tabs with report parts you need syntax that is specific to a cross-tab. please look up Report Parts in your Online Help, Index and then go to the Context Scenarios section.
Cross-tabs
If the object you copy in your source report is part of a cross-tab, the Context Report Part data context is based on the selected object embedded in the cross-tab. Crystal Reports creates the data context by tracking if the selected object in the cross-tab is a row, column, or cell. Next, the program retrieves row and column names. Then it parses the Design view data context. Finally, it generates the Context Report Part data context by adding the GridRowColumnValue function if the group in the data context formula appears in the row or column names retrieved earlier. You might see, for example, a data context such as:
"/"GridRowColumnValue("Customer.Country")"/"+GridRowColumnValue("Customer.Region")

Crosstab with multiple rowset xml content

I have multiple rowsets (xml files) which I want to calculate subtotals from. Each xml data set has identical columns. If I union all the files together, the xml content contains multiple rowsets and the Crosstab function does not give me a summed value of each column, but instead it creates a column for each column in each rowset.
The Normalize and the rowset combiner transform both combine rowsets by appending the second dataset into new columns, is there any way to append the data into new rows instead?
Because my final file is going to have something over 30,000 rows (14Mb), I am reluctant to use a repeater on each row of each file to combine it into a new rowset. Is there an efficient way to handle this calculation?

Sue,
I believe that we are off on the wrong foot here...all things aside...
Join will work for your scenario when combined with other actions for your calculation and it will be easier to maintain than a stylesheet which will be beneficial to you in the end. Please do not be too quick to judge the solution
As for the error message that's one for support, what was the error in the logs?
-Sam

Running total and Next function in Crosstab

Clarifications on getting Next Running sum and count on a Crosstab Here is the example, which I am working on:Highlights of the Report:- Report is grouped on {Scenario Name}- Left side dates on any of the tables is {Version Date}- Dates on the top header on any of the tables is {Fsc Week End Dt}- Other formulae used in this report are:1) = ({Query1.Demand Qty})/100000Numerical values displayed in the "Original values" table.2) =if {Query1.Scenario Name} = 'DLYPRD:ASCP-PRD:PRD' THEN mid ({Query1.Scenario Name},13,3)ELSE mid ({Query1.Scenario Name},13,6)Second column with value PRD in any of the tables.3) {next qty} = if not onlastrecord then next({@ShortDemandQty}) else 0;(used in the "next values vertically" table)4) - running total to calculate horizontallyEvaluate - For each recordReset - On change of field: {Version Date}5) - running total to calculate vertically.Evaluate - For each recordReset - On change of field: {Fsc Week End Dt} In this report design, when I go and change the Sort order in the Record Sort Expert, some of the values go for a toss. I got two cases where the vertical values are correct in one case and horizontal values are correct in another case. First Case: Cumulative vertical values are correct.  Second Case: Cumulative horizontal values are correct.  Is there any way to consistisize both the horizontal and vertical running totals. I even tried forcing the evaluate & reset like below and clearing the record sort order, but it did not work: 1) - running total to calculate horizontallyEvaluate - On change of field: {Fsc Week End Dt}Reset - On change of field: {Version Date}2) - running total to calculate vertically.Evaluate - On change of field: {Version Date}Reset - On change of field: {Fsc Week End Dt} And one more observation on the running total, how it works in the crosstab is, the total runs likes a spiral rather than resetting at the column or row level. Is there any way to restrict this? 3) {next qty} = if not onlastrecord then next({@ShortDemandQty}) else 0;(used in the "next values vertically" table) For example, onlastrecord does not seem to work on the "next values vertically" crosstab, rather brings the record from the next column.For 3/7/2007 - 01/APR/07, the value is 157.84 which is incorrect and should be 0.I need to get a next on the running total. Next (fld) doesnot work for running totals. Please guide me, how to get the next values for the running total fields.

Post Author: redtop6683
CA Forum: Formula
Whoops I guess I should have mentioned that I've already tried using Sum and Round(Running Total, 2) and haven't had any luck.
I also should have mentioned that Groupings 1 and 2 are sums, and that Running Total is a running total that changes on every change of the grouping. There are 4 groupings.
Grouping 1 (Employee Name)
Grouping 1.1 (Shift)
Grouping 1.2.1 (Payroll Department Code)
Grouping 1.2.1.1 (Description)
Below these 4 groupings is where the running total is. The issue is that in the footer of grouping 1 is a field that sums the elapsed hours for the particular employee by each payroll department code, these are then summed using the running total. The issue is as stated in the earler post that I can round these individual sums on the groupings, but I get the number on my running total to round differently as you can see by the earlier post's example.
Thanks for the help.
~Jason

Wrapping Crosstab using SAP Hierarchy in Crystal Reports

Hi Experts,
hope you are fine!
Need some advice and helpful hints achieving my goal.
Frontend Tool: Crystal Reports for Enterprise SP2 or even Crystal Reports 2008.
DataSource is BEx Query with Profit Center Hier. in columns and a cost type structure in Rows.
Using a Cross Tab and selecting the PC in columns, results in that Crystal is displaying the hierarchy as it is, which is actually good.
But not readable if you have more than 150 child nodes and more than 15 Levels.
I am looking for a optimized way to display such a scenario.
Whtin this lesson the mentor is explaining how to wrap columns within crosstabs.
Link: [http://www.crystalkeen.com/articles/crystalreports/crosstabwrapping.htm]
The formula @EachRegion is counting the rows and the formula @GroupRegions is than defining the number of regions to be displayed in the columns.
I was looking to replace the formula @EachRegion with the HierarchyLevel(GroupingLevel) function which is delivering the same result, but due to any reason I can not group on this formula.
My intention was grouping on the level number and keep all nodes on the samel level together so the wrapping should happen level wise. The report finally should look like this using a cross tab:
Group 1                               level 0
            cost a                       50
            cost b                       20
Group 2                               level 1
           cost a
           cost b
Or do you have other option to have a better view on this, maybe using subreports or anything what Crystal is offering?
Apologize if this sounds a bit confusing, but your hints are much appreciated.
Thanks and bye

Hi Debi,
thanks for your reply.
The formula for grouping purposes is: HierarchyLevel(GroupingLevel({ZTEMP_Profit-Center\Profit-Center}))
The result is that for each node the level number is displayed.
I tried to put in the detail section or grouping section thinking that it should be used first in the report somewhere but wo success.
appreacite your response.
bye

Design Studio Crosstab - Limitation?

Hello All,
Below is a summary of issue I'm facing at a customer location.
Design Studio CrossTab :
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
north
100
120
130
142
south
123
176
132
123
east
130
187
154
134
west
132
133
189
134
I'm currently working at a customer place on a dashboard requirement and found this gap in requirement for crosstab.
Would really appreciate if anyone can point me towards a workaround to achieve this.
Consider the above sample cross tab which shows regional sales by quarter.
It is required to be able to click on any of the numbers and go to a detailed report for those two dimensions : EG : click on 100 and open detailed report for NORTH/Q1.
We plan to achieve this by using design studio for first page and on click open a webi document thru OPENDOCU and passing respective parameters.
The problem is , in design studio – it is not possible to click on a measure to capture both the dimensions.
In the CROSS-TAB component of Design studio,We can either capture region or Quarter but not both at the same time.
Is there any way I can click on the numbers and capture the associated two dimensions for the key-figure.?

Vinay, as you that cross tab will let you select either on row header or column header. Meaning, you can select either row value or column value.
So this can be achieved but you need to have dimensions either in columns or in rows. I tested this scenario and could capture both dimension values.
Apparently, it is a workaround not a solution
var div=CROSSTAB_2.getSelectedMember("_dbYX8CwZEeS6mO4guBZEDA").text;
var type=CROSSTAB_2.getSelectedMember("_dbY_ACwZEeS6mO4guBZEDA").text;
TEXT_3.setText(div+type);
You may use these variables in your OPENDOC.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Tejas

Independent Stand-alone calculation for each Crosstab

Hi All,
In my report, I have two crosstabs in two different report header sections. In the first crosstab, I have Division and Company chars.
In the second crosstab I have Category and Company chars. I have one key figure (KF) in both crosstabs.
My expectation is to see independent, stand-alone results for these two crosstabs. But this is not the case..
Sum of Company X in the second crosstab (which is for category level) is displayed in the first crosstab (division level) for Company X.
But in my scenario, Company X has a different value in division level..
When I remove the second crosstab (category level) and refresh the report, then I see correct values for Company X in division level.
How can I tell the CR that each crosstab should run separately, without being influenced from other ones?
Below, I tried to show the issue..
Crosstab1:
Division A...........100
Company X..........55 -
> This is sum of below crosstab values (for company X).
Crosstab2:
Category C........60
Company X........20
Company Y........10
Category D........40
Company X.......35
Company Y.......5
Thanks
Ozan

Hi Ozan,
One of your crosstab will need to be a subreport. The reason they both show the same result is they are both using the same recordset. Your second crosstab needs to be run as a result of the Company in Report1.
Try creating a group in your report and drop the first Crosstab into the GroupHeader.
Now create a new report that matches your second Crosstab. Insert this new report as a subreport into the GroupFooter.
That should give you the result your looking for.
Good luck,
Brian

Crosstab issue: Suppress Zeros in Rows

Dear all,
We have a report in BO Design Studio with a crosstab.
In this crosstab I have some rows where all key figures are 0 (or empty).
In BO Analysis Office these rows can be suppressed via Filter >> Suppress Zeros in Rows.
How can we achieve this in Design Studio?
Kind regards,
Lieselot

Hi,
Maybe not exactly for your scenario but for similar ones it could be more useful:
A very interesting way of filtering data based on Key Figure values (Measures) is by using Conditions.
You can even change the values for your conditions dynamically directly from Design Studio either via user interaction (such as through a Dropdown or Prompt dialog) or only in the background via scripting (for example in the Application On Startup Event).
See this great post from Xavier Hacking about how it can be done: http://www.hackingsap.com/blog/sap-design-studio-and-conditions
So you could also create a simple condition for a "key figure value not equal 0" - that could be another option. The advantage is the possibility later to make some changes to the condition directly in Design Studio. But you do not need that if the rows with 0 values shouldn't be shown all the time (then you don't need to use a variable in the condition).
Regards,
David

Excluding values in crosstab

Hi,
In my crosstab I have Company in rows and I need to exclude some companies in this crosstab.
In Crosstab-expert,for Company, from "Group options", I tried "not equal to" option but, it did not work.
Is there any way to do this?
Regards
Ozan

hello,
the standard function is actually what Carl suggested by using the Report > Selection Filters > Record.
<> "abc"
however, you mentioned that this was not applicable to your scenario....perhaps as this will eliminate the "abc" record from the entire report.
cheers,
jamie

SAP DS 1.3: Performance issues with crosstab planning (IE only)

Hi everyone,
because im currently developing a custom component for DS 1.3, I got in touch with the planning feature of design studio. Planning currently only works in a crosstab.
Here I recognized a significant performance issue with the internet explorer:
If you simply type in a new value into a cell in a crosstab, it takes ~10s to confirm it (not constant! Sometimes it takes 2s, sometimes 15s). During this 10s, it seems like the IE crashed - no response at all. Sometimes there is also a warning message on bottom ('... script is slowing down the application ...').
Tested the same scenario with Chrome and FF - takes less than 1s to confirm.
Whats going on here ...? Anyone experienced the same issues?
My testing environment:
Windows 8.1
IE 11 (also tested emulated Ie 10 and IE 9 - same problem)
DS 1.3.0.3.201405141058
Local mode
Application only contained a simple crosstab, data source based on BW 7.3 query
Of course I deactivated all custom components while testing...
Kind regards
Wladimir

Hi Tammy,
Thanks for your reply. Of course, my IE is updated to latest version (11.0.9600.17207).
Hopefully SP1 will fix this bug...
Kind regards
Wladimir

Crosstab with a twist

Hi,
Say I have a crosstab with 3 Columns, Jan08, Feb 08, and Mar08 and two rows for Employee X. One row displays Sum of Sales while the other displays Sum of Commissions.
Here's what I want to do:
If the Sum of Sales is below zero then make Sum of Commissons field RED otherwise DefaultAttribute OR
if the previous month's Sum of Sales was below zero, make this month's Sum of Commissions field RED as well. So take this scenario for example
 Jan08 Feb08 Mar08
Employee X
Sum of Sales -20 10 30
Sum of Commisson 15 35 40
I want the values 15 and 35 to be RED in this example.
Yesterday, I learned how to figure out the first part of my logic: (if the Sum of Sales is below zero then make Sum of Commissions field RED otherwise DefaultAttribute) Here's the logic for that
In Sum of Sales Suppress X+2 Conditional Formula add this:
whileprintingrecords;
numbervar i;
i:=currentfieldvalue;
false
Now you have the sum of sales in the variable i; so right click on the sum of commision field and go to font color and write this
whileprintingrecords;
numbervar i;
if i<0 then
crred
else
defaultattribute
So, how can I accomodate the second part of the OR clause?, namely:
OR
if the previous month's Sum of Sales was below zero, make this month's Sum of Commissions field RED as well.
Thank you in advance,
Zack H.
Edited by: Zack H on Sep 9, 2009 10:39 AM

Raghavendra,
I'm almost there I can taste it.
So here's what I've done so far.
I created a formula called {@Setting x} and placed it in the Report Header.
Whileprintingrecords;
global numbervar x;
x:=1;
I created a formula called {@Store Array Values} and placed it in details section (its a summarized table so detail section is fine, stores right results);
whileprintingrecords;
global numbervar array arr;
global numbervar x;
redim preserve arr[1000];
arr[x]:={Table.Value};
x:=x+1;
In the Crosstab's format field -> Font tab -> the conditional formula now looks like this.
whileprintingrecords;
global numbervar i;
global numbervar array arr;
if i<0 or arr[6]<0 then
crRed else
DefaultAttribute
I just inserted 6 as that is the row that has a negative Sum of Sales. This actually turned all the Sum of Commissions row RED. Obviously I am missing the step where I need to have the array dynamically change as each crosstab column changes so I don't have to hard-code the 6 (as shown in this example). Any ideas?
Thanks again,
Zack H.

Crosstab performance problem

Post Author: TONGPHI
CA Forum: General
I am using VB6 and Crystal Report 10 with latest fixes.The report template has 2 crosstabs. Data source are two XSD schemas. The recordsets - as data source - are retreived by VB codes and passed to report viewer object by VB codes. It's taken 10 seconds to retreive the recordsets but it's taken the viewer 4 minutes to display the report - 60 columns and 70 rows in total. It is too slow - any explanation ?)Two very interesting scenarios has been found: 1. If I remove one crosstab then it's taken the viewer only 5 seconds to display the report. (number of records from 2 recordsets are nearly the same)2. if I place one crosstab in the main report and one in a subreport then it's taken the viewer only 5 seconds to display the report. (Fast and complete but with small problem - see below ) . I need to have 2 crosstabs in the report. Scenario 2 has it own problem because I can't print the correct total page count of the whole report in the main report.Any discussion will be very much appreciated.

At the moment we are hoping this will be fixed in a 10g database patch which is due early 2005. However, if you are using an Analytic Workspace then you could use OLAP DML to filter the zero and NA rows before they are returned to the query. I think this involves modifying the OLAP views that return the AW objects via SQL commands.
Hope this helps
Business Intelligence Beans Product Management Team
Oracle Corporation

Logical System in IDOC-XI scenario

Hi,
I need help to understand few things in IDOC-XI scenario, could any one help me in this regard.
we use Adapter specific identifiers to map services, we have following type of identifiers 1) Sys.ID & Client No. 2) Logical System.
my questions are
a) Are we use Logical System in B to B scenario ?
b) Are we use LS in reference to the SAP system or Non SAP system ? if a non SAP system....how a non SAP system send an IDOC and why a non SAP system receive an IDOC ( conversion is possible in XI ) ?
Thanks and Regards
Mahesh.

Hay Kumar,
Logical systems can also be used for SAp sytems wich are not installed yet as a virtuall placeholder.
a) yes. if on of your business is a non sap system or a propritery system that you developed yuo'll ue LS.
b) non SAP system can send and recieve IDOCs. so it's possiable to get an IDOC from a system and turn it into an RFC for SAP or get an IDOC from an SAP system and then turn it into something else for another system.
Have a Good One,
Uri Lifshitz.

Sale Order Scenario - Report in PS Budget /Actual/Variance

Dear Experts,
Please help me understand solve the scenario given below
Step 1
Work order issued to a contractor ( contract includes Service and Material from the contractor) - Service being the labour part
and Material being the cement
But cement is supplied by the client as a sale of cement at a basic price agreed between the two parties.
Eg:
There are 2 WBS
WBS 1 - has a PR released converted to PO with value 100 ( inclusive service + material)
Material procured through me51n , Me21n - GR done and stock has come to GNST ( 40 rs)
material converted to sale order stock mb1b - 412 E after creating sale order with reference to WBS 2
WBS 2 - reports cost incurred for procurement ie; 40rs
Actual booked against WBS1 based on GR 100
Once the billing is done for rs 20 ( basic price) report in budget actual variance shows as below
                Budget    Actual    Variance
WBS 1      200          100          100
WBS 2                       40           -40
Report should show 120 as the project cost rather than 140 - since 20 is lost against selling at lower cost.
How to get the cost to 120 which is the actual cost for the work

Dear Experts,
Please help me understand solve the scenario given below
Step 1
Work order issued to a contractor ( contract includes Service and Material from the contractor) - Service being the labour part
and Material being the cement
But cement is supplied by the client as a sale of cement at a basic price agreed between the two parties.
Eg:
There are 2 WBS
WBS 1 - has a PR released converted to PO with value 100 ( inclusive service + material)
Material procured through me51n , Me21n - GR done and stock has come to GNST ( 40 rs)
material converted to sale order stock mb1b - 412 E after creating sale order with reference to WBS 2
WBS 2 - reports cost incurred for procurement ie; 40rs
Actual booked against WBS1 based on GR 100
Once the billing is done for rs 20 ( basic price) report in budget actual variance shows as below
                Budget    Actual    Variance
WBS 1      200          100          100
WBS 2                       40           -40
Report should show 120 as the project cost rather than 140 - since 20 is lost against selling at lower cost.
How to get the cost to 120 which is the actual cost for the work

Possible to do if/then scenarios?

I work for a large company that has many sales branches throughout the US (40+). Each branch has a MPLS circuit and a local ISP. We have prioritized data that is sent over the MPLS circuit, and all other data over the ISP, with failover configured for either circuit to fail over to the other one. Right now all of the sales branches internet traffic (along with all non-priority traffic such as email) comes back thru the ISP (via a VPN tunnel) to our main location, so we can monitor the internet links. We would like configure the normal internet traffic to go out the ISP directly, but still have the email and so come back via the VPN tunnel. We know how to configure this, however, when we do this we would like to install a PC with some monitoring software on it (surf control), that way we can still monitor the internet traffic. We would like to set it up so that if the PC with Surf Control goes down, that the router will send traffic back over the VPN tunnel or MPLS traffic. So the basis of what I want to do is:
If PC Goes Down = False, Send Traffic To PC
If PC Goes Down = True, Send Data To VPN tunnel or MPLS circuit.
Is it possible to do such a scenario?
We do not currently have the budget for a pix or anything like this, so we are trying to figure it out. I have attached a very basic diagram of the basic network configuration that we have. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Also we do have a Ciscoworks LMS 2.6 available as well if that would help at all.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5413/products_feature_guide09186a00801d862d.html
good luck,
Peter

A crosstab scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for