About AUC

Dear All
when i am going for the release of Project i am getting the following error
Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element
A-AKERI-09-01
     Message no. CJ824  
please guide me how to solve this error
regards
raj

Hi Raj,
Open the AUC of that WBSE and maintain Depreciation Details of that AUC and now try to release WBSE.
Path --> Select WBSE --> Edit --> WBSE --> AUC.
Still getting error messages...reply back !!
Regards,
Hari

Similar Messages

  • Pls tell me about AUC

    hi
    i need a concept about auc.
    I know the configuration of asset management. is there need any extra knowledge to configure auc? please tell me.

    Hi,
    AUC means assets under construction. Following steps are applicable for AUCs.  You park all APC values and formation expenses temporarily till the asset is ready for capitalization.  Normally, no depreciation will be computed on these assets.  The asssets can be capitalised in many ways depends upon the business process.
    1) T-Code OAOA Line item settlement is selected (Mandatory)
    2) T-Code OAYZ enter 0000 depreciation key in the asset class (Recommended)
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Madhu

  • Asset class Reports and the G/L accounts balances are not tallying

    Hi
    As per the G/L account (Recon) Furniture is showing 952428.18 and the furniture asset class report is showing 916186.25.
    Kindly tell me how to reconcile, the way to find out the differences.
    With regars
    Siva

    Hi
    As per the suggestions given i verified
    1. Asset transactions might have posted after posting depreciation for the period
    I verified this. there are no postings
    2. Depreciation terms (depreciation key, useful life ) might have changed.
    The depreciation terms are not changed
    3, Manual transactions might have posted directly to GL Accounts.
    No manual transactions are there.
    Correct the differences by
    1. Repeat the depreciation posting program (AFAB)
    2. Execute Recalculate (AFAR) and Repeat the depreciation posting program.
    I executed AFAR it is updating the G/L accounts only not the FI-AA
    3. Check the Manual entries posted in GL Account of Furniture asset class and reverse
    manual entries are not posted.
    I executed ABST. There are no errors.
    i verified the SAP Note. it is basically explaining about AUC(We don't have) reconciliation and this is the first year (3months completed after go-live)
    any other possible reconciliation is appreciable
    with regards
    Siva

  • REVAL AND TRANSLATION G/L ACCOUNTS

    We post to the following G/L's - I'd appreciate feedback on where YOU post your transactions (P&L or CTA).  thanks.
    (1A) revaluate (type 10) (the differences between Local Currency (LC) from the original posting date and the current key revaluation date) - we post these to:
    unrealized - P&L
    realized - P&L
    (1B) Part 2 of 1A - if done this way - posts the TRANSLATION of the revaluated amount to Group Currency (GC)
    unrealized - P&L
    realized - CTA
    So OBA1 - table [V_T030H] has for type 10
    Exchange Rate Difference REALIZED - P&L
    Valuation (unrealized) - P&L
    Translation - blank
    ==========
    (2A) translation (type 30) (the difference between the GC value on the original posting date and the current key revaluation date for type 30)
    realized - CTA (from reval type 30)
    unrealized - P&L (from reval type 10 - translation to GC - to P&L??)
    So OBA1 - table [V_T030H] has for type 30
    Exchange Rate Difference Realized - CTA
    Valuation (unrealized) - P&L
    translation - blank

    Hi
    As per the suggestions given i verified
    1. Asset transactions might have posted after posting depreciation for the period
    I verified this. there are no postings
    2. Depreciation terms (depreciation key, useful life ) might have changed.
    The depreciation terms are not changed
    3, Manual transactions might have posted directly to GL Accounts.
    No manual transactions are there.
    Correct the differences by
    1. Repeat the depreciation posting program (AFAB)
    2. Execute Recalculate (AFAR) and Repeat the depreciation posting program.
    I executed AFAR it is updating the G/L accounts only not the FI-AA
    3. Check the Manual entries posted in GL Account of Furniture asset class and reverse
    manual entries are not posted.
    I executed ABST. There are no errors.
    i verified the SAP Note. it is basically explaining about AUC(We don't have) reconciliation and this is the first year (3months completed after go-live)
    any other possible reconciliation is appreciable
    with regards
    Siva

  • About Group asset and auc

    When i creat asset for auc but after the settelement ,i want to settel this asset in main asset ,when i cerat main asset the required group asset and sub numbe ,so please tell be the relation between main asset ,group asset and auc.
    Regards,
    Pramod Kulkarni.

    1.ASSET CLASSES
    First you create three asset classes for:
    ex:
       ASSET CLASS                              NUMBER RANGE
    1.Plant & machinery                               100-200
    2.Plant& Machinery for  Group Assets-     500-600
    3.Plant & Machinery AUC                       1000-1100
    2.CREATE ASSETS
    First you create  AUCEX; 1000
    THEN POST THE TRANSACTIONS
    3.If you want settele thisauc to fixed asset.
    a. first you create group asset ex:  500
    b. then create Fixed asset  ex: 100
    at the time of creation of Fixed asset , you have to mention in tehasset masster what is the Group asset no:
    for ex;  with in 100 you have to mention 500.
    Then settele the AUC TO fIXED ASSET.
    From here what ever transactions youare osted to Fixed aseet it will update in Group asset also.
    chandra

  • KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

    Hi Experts,
    We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
    We did the following:
    1. Created Auc Class
    2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
    3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
    01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
    02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
    4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
    5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
    6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
    When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
    But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
    1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
    2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
    Did you face any problem like this?
    I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
    Kind Regards
    Mayumi Blak

    Hi Ajay
    I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
    I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
    When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
    The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
    I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
    Kind Regards
    Mayumi Blak

  • Profit center with AUC

    Hi Gurus.
    1) What is the linkage between Profit centre and AUC with respect to WBS element?
    Example: If I activated AUC then the respective WBS element is not taking Profit center automatically/Manually??(In the case of Invoice doc. creation the error is like --"Balancing field "Segment" in line item 001 is not filled"?
    2) What is the document splitting? How can we know the functionality of splitting ?can any one tell me about the topic or send me some supporting docs to sanjaykumar.ps at gmail dot com
    Thanks in advance,
    Sanju...

    Dear
    you need to use automatci assignments. Use ACSET and in that for Ord Dper and APC give * for all transaction types and select dep run. Here you need to give COst center.
    In Auc youi might have suppressed the Cost center in time dependent data. You make it optional or mandatory. The link is in Asset Master in time dependent data you have teh project assignment.
    On Doucment splitting
    You can use the document splitting procedure to split up line items for selected dimensions (such as receivable lines by profit center) or to effect a zero balance setting in the document for selected dimensions (such as segment). This generates additional clearing lines in the document. Using the document splitting procedure is the prerequisite for as well as an essential tool for drawing up complete financial statements for the selected dimensions at any time.
    You can choose between displaying the document with the generated clearing lines either in its original form in the entry view or from the perspective of a ledger in the general ledger view.
    For document splitting to be possible, the individual document items and the documents must be classified. Each classification corresponds to a rule in which it is specified how document splitting is to occur and for which line items.
    SAP delivers a set of standard rules that should usually prove sufficient. If not, you can define your own set of rules and adapt these according to your needs.
    Example
    Example 1: Invoice
    Suppose a vendor invoice containing the following items is entered:
    Posting Key Account Segment Amount
    31 Payables  -100
    40 Expense 0001    40
    40 Expense 0002   60
    Document splitting then creates the following document in the General Ledger view:
    Posting Key Account Segment Amount
    31 Payables 0001   -40
    31 Payables 0002   -60
    40 Expense 0001   40
    40 Expense 0002   60
    Example 2: Payment
    The payment for the above vendor invoice then contains the following items when entered:
    Posting Key Account Segment Amount
    50 Bank  -95
    25 Payables   100
    50 Cash Discount Received  -5
    Document splitting then creates the following document in the General Ledger view:
    Posting Key Account Segment Amount
    50 Bank 0001   -38
    50 Bank 0002   -57
    25 Payables  0001   40
    25 Payables  0002   60
    50 Cash Discount Received 0001     -2
    50 Cash Discount Received 0002     -3
    And don't request the users with personal IDs as moderator will lock the thread and even though you give me points he will withdraw at a later date.
    You need to search the forum first.
    Reward if useful
    sarma

  • How to identify WBS elements with AuC status

    Hello Experts,
    We had earlier developed a report which determines whether the entered project id can be set to CLSD status or not. The problem arises with few WBS elements which have AuC statuses. The report is displaying them as closeable but we fail to close them through CJ20N. The problem is that the program captures the status of some projects as TECO but these projects have WBS elements which have statuses like "TECO BUDG AUC  SETCu201D because of which the system doesnu2019t allow CJ20N to close it. So can any one help me suggest any means by which we can detect whether any of a projects WBS elements are in the AUC status?
    Regards,
    Uday

    Hi Virendra,
    Thanks a lot for your inputs. I was trying to go through the tables in detail before I again get back to you about anything. From TJ02 I got to know that I0163 is the status code for Asset in construction costs. So I obtained the OBJNR values of all my WBS elements and I went through all the 3 tables TJ02, JCDS & JSTO that you had suggested. The data in JEST for 1 of the OBJNR values contained this I0163 value in 1 row. I wasn't however sure as to which particular status we could consider for the WBS from among the list. Is it something like the last row of the table would be the current status of the element & that all the other statuses just point to the various history of changes that it went through? (Am mailing you a copy of the same thread so that you would get the data displayed in a proper tabular format.)
    Regards,
    Uday
    MANDT   OBJNR              STAT    INACT    CHGNR
      400         PR00304257       I0001      X           002  
      400         PR00304257       I0002      X           004  
      400         PR00304257       I0005      X           001  
      400         PR00304257       I0028                   001  
      400         PR00304257       I0045                   003  
      400         PR00304257       I0064      X           002  
      400         PR00304257       I0067                   001  
      400         PR00304257       I0163                   001

  • Settlement of proj cost to AUC and final settmnt to f.asset for closed proj

    Hi PS Experts,
    If the project (Investment Projects) has been closed and AUC has been fully settled to final asset but in some cases they still received invoices for the same project.
    Would it be correct if they undo closed and undo teco the project and charge the cost to related WBS elements and settle to AUC then proceed to fully settled to a new fixed asset ? SInce the previous fixed asset has been depreciated, i guess we should create totally new asset to settle this new cost.
    Please advise.
    Thanks and regards,
    Yuzeila

    yes it is fine to do that from a system perspective
    choose full capitalisation in  transaction CJ88
    also make sure that the settlement rule to the final asset is entered on the WBS
    you need to check with your FI guidelines about asset value dates etc to check about the business perpspective
    As an alternative - It would be OK to create a sub asset with new asset value dates and use this sub asset in the settlement rule

  • Asset Down Payment  for AUC

    Hi,
    I am having a query in Asset Down Payment  for AUC
    I have configured for both Acquisition: down payments and Down-payments clearing account in 'AO90' in asset module.
    But I am still not clear why Down-payments clearing account account needs to be configured.
    The entry I am getting are
    1. F-47 DP request - I enter the Asset number here. Noted item.
    2. F-48 -DP- an entry is created as follows:
    Vendor     Dr     1000
    Bank     Cr     1000
    Acquisition: down payments     Dr     1000
    Down-payments clearing account     Cr     1000
    3. Now the Down-payments clearing account shows a credit balance all the time.
    How should this be rectified
    rgds
    Vidhya

    Hi Vidya,
    Option 1: When you follow based on your example, ie., asset debited during down payment entry, asset entry will be reversed when you adjust down payment against invoice.
    Option 2: Down payment request and down payment made against AUC asset with reference to Purchase order:
    With reference to PO: Please refer sap note number 310368 valuated goods receipt paragraph and they have clearly mentioned about making down payments against asset/AUC purchase order without getting debited to asset account.
    You have to make F5 378 message number to be a warning message instead of error message and you have to suppress asset related settings in OB41 posting keys 29 and 39. Posting key 39 is useful when you have down payment request.
    If you have done this, then it will show only warning message during down payment that "purchase order is related to asset" and it will not be debited to asset account. Also after following the above steps, it is not necessary for you to give Acquisition: down payments G/L and Down payment clearing G/L in AO90 transaction code.
    Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
    Regards,
    Dwarak.

  • AUC Posting & Treatment

    Hello Experts
    We have implemented sap in jan11 & all the expenses towards this software all booked in gl called advance expenses for sap,now for balance sheet we have to capitalize this expenses as huge amount.
    My queary is about how to transfer this expenses into asset(upto jan all legacy balancetill march some expensesexpenses from april to till date)
    I think i can take it as AUC or is there any way out?
    & if AUC treatement should be given then what is the procedure to do that step by step?please explain with tcodes

    HI Sweet,
    1.Create AUC Asset under Asset class (WIP/AUC) AS01
    2.Create Internal order  T.Code:KO01
    3.Change Internal Order KO02  Give Settlement Rule with AUC Asset
    4.while creating internal order if we select Investment profile 000001 (internally AUC asset will create)
    5.Change Internal Order  KO02 Release (TECO)
    6.Post GL exp to the Order  in FB50 / FB60     
    7.Asset Settlement :Order KO88
    Settle Internal exp to AUC periodically,
    Final AUC asset settle to Main asset AIAB- AIBU.
    Let me know for further assistance...!
    Rds,
    Anil

  • Capital project WBS settle to AUC individually

    Dear all experts,
    please help me on the following issues.
    i am working on a capital project. Investment profile is defined and assgined to the project profile.
    the top WBS is T-09-001
    the second level WBS are T-09-001-01,  T-09-001-02,  T-09-001-03,  T-09-001-04, T-09-001-05 for example.
    the third level WBS is T-09-001-05-01.
    i do the test settlement when the project status is release. (i didn't maintain the settlement rule.)
    the result is that every single WBS is settled to a FXA (the numbers are generated automatically)
    for example
    T-09-001-01 to  FXA 1000/40047/0   30000CNY
    T-09-001-02 to  FXA 1000/40048/0   40000CNY
    T-09-001-03 to  FXA  1000/40049/0  40000CNY......
    i am not sure if it is correct or not, because it's my first time to deal with capital projects.
    if i want to settle all the sub-WBS to top WBS and the top one settled to AUC, how can i do it.
    i manually maintain the settlement rule for all the sub-WBS to top WBS and settle the project again.
    but the result is the same. i don't know where the problem is.
    please tell me how to do it or how to settle the capital projects in most cases?
    thanks a lot.
    judy

    Below was something which we had done in such case:
    1. Created a substitution rule against the WBS element, if the level of WBS >=2 substitute the Investment profile with 'Blank'. With this when ever you create a project and save it or call the substitution from menu, system would retain the investment profile on level 1 WBS and when project is released only 1 AUC is created for the project which is on level 1 WBS.
    2. Settle all other lower WBS to it's parent WBS and you can implement OSS note 211324 - CJB1: Strategy for settlement to superior WBS. Refer the below link about how this works:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ModificationnoteforStrategyforsettlementtosuperiorWBS
    Doing both the above, you would create only 1 AUC (on level 1 WBS) and finally settle all lower WBS to level 1 WBS and from there system would then automatically settle the costs to AUC fixed asset.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Functional report specifications for AUC reporting

    Hi All,
    Does anyone have a sample document about functional report specifications for
    AUC reporting?
    Can anyone e-mail a sample report to [email protected]
    Thank you,
    Best Regards,
    John Mc

    Hi,
    Looking at the requirement  it seems like you have 2 level of authorization check i.e. Check first user is authorized for cost center. And if yes then look for teh combination of Func area related to that cost center, for that user.
    I think keeping the second check for func. area within loop of cost center (for each cost center) should work.
    Thank-You.
    Regards,
    Vinod

  • Settlement  inv. measure to Auc: different values in different depr. areas

    Hi!
    Due to IAS/IFRS principles we have to manage different Asset values for a Local Gaap and IAS depreciation areas. We know that is possible to use transaction types limited to each single area to post different values directly in AA.
    We'd like to know if there is a way to settle different values from investment measures to AuC's different areas; since in customizing is possible to define only one specific internal transaction type for settlement from investment measures to AuC. We cannot use Key capitalization, since we are not using different cost elements.
    We are also considering to use custom enhancement.
    Do you have any suggestions about it?
    Thanks in advance!
    Giovanna

    Hi,
    Could you please let me know if this is solved? If yes the approach you have taken to solve this. We have a similar kind of requirement.
    Thanks,
    Anuradha

  • Reverse settled cost of AuC

    Hi All,
    We have settled cost to AuC in Mar' 08 and now we can reverse it in Mar'09, Is it possible? When I try to reverse it the following message is displayed, " Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 012 2009. Message No. KD547.
    pls. guide how to go about with this situation.
    Regards,
    Aman

    Hi Aman,
    Please refer SAP Note 31163 for your needful
    Regards,
    Santosh

Maybe you are looking for