Settlement of proj cost to AUC and final settmnt to f.asset for closed proj

Hi PS Experts,
If the project (Investment Projects) has been closed and AUC has been fully settled to final asset but in some cases they still received invoices for the same project.
Would it be correct if they undo closed and undo teco the project and charge the cost to related WBS elements and settle to AUC then proceed to fully settled to a new fixed asset ? SInce the previous fixed asset has been depreciated, i guess we should create totally new asset to settle this new cost.
Please advise.
Thanks and regards,
Yuzeila

yes it is fine to do that from a system perspective
choose full capitalisation in  transaction CJ88
also make sure that the settlement rule to the final asset is entered on the WBS
you need to check with your FI guidelines about asset value dates etc to check about the business perpspective
As an alternative - It would be OK to create a sub asset with new asset value dates and use this sub asset in the settlement rule

Similar Messages

  • Problem: I click, the spinning wheel goes on for a while and finally I get the result for what I clicked for! All the time ...

    I click, the spinning wheel goes on and on, and finally it clicks in! Does it everytime time ...Could it be MacKeeper fault? I have 90GB available on my mid 2009 13inch MacBookPro with 8GB memory. I am Mac OS X Lion. This is disconcerting. Thanks for any help.

    First, Try using Disk Utility to do a Disk Repair, as shown in this link, while booted up on your install disk. You could have some directory corruption. Let us know what errors Disk Repair reports and if DU was able to repair them. This could just be a start in repairs and you may need a better utility to finish the job.
    Then Repair Permissions.
    No need to report any Permissions errors........we all get them.
       DALE

  • Manually Posting costs to AUC

    Hi Experts,
    A) In Old server:
    A1. There is some cost in AUC, which has been partially settled from WBS Element to the Asset no. of AUC.
    B) New Server:
    B1. The cost available in AUC of old server has to be migrated in a new sever. And then same cost has to be settled from AUC of New server to the fixed asset of new server
    Problems:
    1.     How to manually post the costs in Asset no. of AUC of new server?
    2.     There is no cost line item in a WBS element of AUC of new server. How to define a settlement rule (from AUC to Fixed Asset) for a such a kind of WBS element?
    Kindly do the nedful
    Thanks and Regards,
    Satya Vani.

    Hi,
    As far as my knowledge goes when you have a two step settlement i.e, Prliminary to AUC and Final to Main assets, all the actual costs have to be posted to AUC periodically and before close of Asset year. Once asset year is closed system will not allow you to post previous year's costs to AUC in the current year.
    A work around will be to create a duplicate WBSe transfer all the unsettled costs to it and continue with the settlement.

  • GLT2201 error while settling AuC to Final Asset through KO88

    Hello,
    We have a scenario where in I am settliing an AuC through KO88 to the final Asset but am getting Document splitting error GLT2201. Profit Center is maintained in the Cost Center assigned to the Asset Master and also in the Internal Order. I could settle from the P/L account to the AuC asset when i ran KO88 earlier but its not allowing settling from AuC to the Final Asset.
    We are using Parallel Ledger and I have defined 2 additional depreciation areas, 30 for posting only depreciation (real area) and 60 for posting only APC (derieved area). I have maintained ACSET for all the depreciation areas. I feel the error is due to Parallel Ledger but I am unable to figure out how and where.
    Can anybody help me out please.
    Thanks,
    Rajat Gupta

    Hello,
    I managed to resolve the error, some how by oversight Profit Center was suppressed in the Field Status of Asset G/Ls though Cost Center was Optional. I changed the Profit Center Field Status to Optional and it worked.
    But I am wondering how it allowed KO88 to run while settling from the Cost Element (P/L GL) to the AuC because they both used the same Field Status?
    Thanks,
    Rajat Gupta

  • AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

    Hi,
    We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
    now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
    Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Nilesh.

    Hi,
    There is no error message in this case.
    The scenario is like:
    I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
    Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
    so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
    FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
    Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
    But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
    I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
    Regards,
    Nilesh

  • How to Link equipments(PM) in a Settlement from AUC to Final Fixed Asset

    Hi All,
    I need your help with an integration problem between AA, CO and PM.
    This is the scenario:
    We are buying equipments that should not be capitaliazed until deliver them to the customer so to support this we do the following flow:
    1. Create an sheduling agreement for the whole year with and AUC and a statistical Internal Order.
    2. We create a 'Good receipt' for purchasing equipments(PM) againts the scheduking agreement. At this time we store the equipments in a specific storage location and those equipments are not capitalized. The equipments are create automatically.
    3. We deliver the equipments to the customer, not necessarily all purchased equipments.
    4. Monthly we have to capitalize the equipments that were delivered to the customer so we create a final fixed asset and execute the settlement of the AUC againts that final fixed.(First AIAB to create settlement rule and then AIBU to distribute)
    Problem:
    When we execute AIAB for the step 4 we can not link the equipments with the final fixed asset, in the settlement rule we have to calculate manually the percentage or the amount that shoul be settle according to the equipments that were deliver to the customer, but we would like to:
    1. Link the equipments to the final fixed asset.
    2. Update the material and quantity in the FI posting line item.
    3. Update the quantity field in the final fixed asset master record automatically.
    Do you have any idea?
    Many thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Please check in the screen layout for Asset Master. I think the equipment field is available.

  • Need WBS split to AUC and Expanses during settlement (not %wise)

    Hi,
    We have some capital projects settling to AUC but we are also charging WBS for labor costs and travel expanses and offcouse capital costs.
    Managment wants PS team to Settle labor/travel to CCTR and Capital cost to AUC. How can WBS recognize cost elements carry expanses and Capital Costs and split them during settlment?
    expanse range: 500000-599999 travel/labor
    Capital expance range: 600000-699999 to be capitalized
    I will appreciate any clue in this regard.
    -Atif
    PS.: I am trying capital investment key at this time, so that WBS will settle only capital range in AUC.

    Hi,
    Maintain different settlement rule for WBSE with different recevier such as AUC & CTR. In settlement configuration define source structure such as CTR & AUC along with cost elements for settling the cost into different receiver.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Error while settling costs to AUC (T.CODE CJ88)

    The following error is encountered while settling costs to AUC using
    t.code CJ88 with WBS element,
    with parameters
    with orders
    Selection  processing type 3 (partial settlement),
    period 4,
    FY 2008,
    selection - with hierarchy, with orders.
    Error message is:-
    Typ Message text
    LTxt
        Sender: WBS ASCP.DSCA.CP.NS.DS.003 PLANNO MILLING 4MX2M
        Acquisition value negative in area 01.

    Hi,
    Use T.Code: as02 and click on Depreciation areas, then double click on Depreciation area(example :01 - book dep), there u can select the field allow negative postings allowed. Once this process is completed, remove that indicator.
    If u couldn't found that field, then goto screen layout for depreciation area and change status from suprress to optional.
    Hope it can resolve ur problem
    regards
    Prasad

  • Reverse settled cost of AuC

    Hi All,
    We have settled cost to AuC in Mar' 08 and now we can reverse it in Mar'09, Is it possible? When I try to reverse it the following message is displayed, " Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 012 2009. Message No. KD547.
    pls. guide how to go about with this situation.
    Regards,
    Aman

    Hi Aman,
    Please refer SAP Note 31163 for your needful
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Without IM how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset

    Dear all
    without IM, how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset.
    can someone explain it in details?
    thanks a lot.
    Judy

    thanks for all of your answers.
    i create the investment profile and assgin it to the project profile.
    when i release the project, i see the system status changed from crtd to release and AUC.
    when i do cj88, the costs are settled to the AUC No. automatically.
    could you tell me how the AUC No. is created? where does it configure?
    when AUC is settled to FXA, what are the procedures?
    first TECO the project and then do CJ88, am I correct?
    thanks a lot
    Judy

  • Settlement of Project Cost and revenue to GL

    I am trying to Settle the project Cost and Revenue to GL account. For the same I have defined settlement profile maintaining GL as optional receiver and then I have maintained Source structure for cost and revenue as to separate them at the time of defining settlement rule, defined Allocation structure where in receiver against source, I have assigned GL as by cost element receiver. After that I have maintained settlement rule for WBS element, but when I am running a settlement is done to either of the GL for cost or Revenue which ever is defined first in settlement rule. It is not creating any settlement for second line item of the settlement rule and system is not giving any error message as well.
    Where as if I am trying individually only for cost or revenue , settlement is completed with all the values but with any accounting document generated, but if I see the entries to that GL, a settlement entry is created for that transaction.
    Can anyone please help in solving this issue ASAP.
    Thanks and Regards

    Hi,
        If it is posting to the first line means....
    Follow the steps below:
    First try to create a project and post the actuals and revenues.
    Go to cost element report pick up those cost elements both for costs and revenues.
    Go to Soruce Structure in the config, define the structure with name for Ex: 'Z1' and define two assignments, one is Costs and other Revenue, by selecting the costs go to Source mention the cost element where the actual costs are posted on (Mention only that cost element no other cost elements), next select the Revenue assignment and click on Source and mention the only cost element where the revenue wsa posted (Mention only that revenue cost element no other cost elements) and save the transaction.
    Come back to project builder, select the wbs and click on settlement rule, in the menu goto-->settlement parameters and check whether the source and settlement profiles are correct or not, incase source structure is not available mention the same.
    come back to settlement Rule overview and fill the fields as mentioned below:
    1st line:   Category: GL
                  GL Account: GL Account Number
                  Source Structure: COSTS
    2nd Line: Category: GL
                  GL Account: GL Account Number (Revenue Account)
                  Source Structure: REVENUE.
    Now Run the Settlement for the specific period costs posted, the costs will be posted seperately to the two different GL Accounts.
    I think this will resolve your problem.
    Rgds
    Sudhir Reddy

  • How to settle project costs to AUC

    Dear Experts,
    Please teach us how to settle project costs to AUC.
    Your response is very much appreciated.

    Refer below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/2a/f9f56e493111d182b70000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Venkat

  • SAP HR INDIAN PAYROLL- FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT GUIDE

    Hi,
    We are implementing SAP HR for Indian Payroll and now trying to configure Full and Final Settlement . We have not integrated our system with FI yet completely. Can anybody please provide me with some link or documentation guide so that i can set up FnF in the system. Although there is data available on google and some of the forums but its not complete .
    Please help.
    Regards
    Neha

    Hi,
    I want to put another question to forum members linked to the above query only. As of now we separate the employee in PA40 personnel actions t-code, now if we use termination workbench, then Pa30 IT0000 does not get updated for the Separation action. In this case do we need to first run the Separation action in PA40 and then through Termination workbench also?
    Please help ASAP.
    Regards
    Neha

  • Rebates : partial settlement and finall settlement in same order type

    Hello,
    I have to activate manual payment procedure for rebates
    But when I put the order type which is the same than the one specified in the final settlement, i got a message VK340 telling me this document type is not allowed for partial rebates.
    I've compared this order type to another one permitted by the systele, i can see no difference.
    In both cases we are speaking about credit note so it could be possible ?
    Thank for your help,

    Hi
    ya of course , Generally we use Order type R4 for Partial settlement amd R3 for Final settlement.Eventually Credit note and final bills r generated consequently.
    So,error is right,
    Plz Go to T.Coed Agreement type VB(2 and  brush up the concept.
    Thanks
    mk
    Note U can even make partial payment Via VBO2.Which give u credit note against that.

  • Query for the FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT REPORT

    Hi,  any one  has the query for the FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT REPORT in oracle hrms??

    Hi,
    I go through that .class file and find that they have used below package in that.
    PAY_IN_TERM_RPRT_GEN_PKG
    Hope this will help you.

Maybe you are looking for