ABUMN issue

Hi experts,
While doing entry through ABUMN:
Line items reduce the cutt-off value by   1.00
Message no.AA632
Asset affected  :INTERN -00001-0000
Diagnosis :
The book value of the asset is below the cut off value in the amount of   1.00
Procedure
Check your entries for the amount, transaction type and cutt-off value specifications,such as memo values,scrap value or cut off value % rate.
Pl advise.
Regrads,
Samar

The error message is telling you to check your cutoff value, memo value, etc.... Have you done that?  Just posting your error message is not sufficient.  You need to provide some details.

Similar Messages

  • ABUMN- Asset value transer issue

    Hi Friends,
    Asset X is capiotalised in Jan 1st 2009. Useful life is given as 5 years. Depreciation is accounted till Dec 31st 2009.
    This asset is transfered new asset Y on Jan 1st 2010. The life of the asset is given as 5 years and opening depreciation start date as jan 1st 2010.
    Now for the Asset Y has life as 5 years starting from 2010-2014.
    But practcally Asset Y should have only 4 years from2010. I.e till 2013.
    Is this be taken care by SAP or we should change the capitalisatio date in Asset Y as Jan 1st 2009.
    Is there any settings which takes only the balance life i.e only 4 years starting 2010.
    Thanks in advance.
    NNS

    Hi,
    Use transfer varient 4 for your ABUMN transaction in additional details tab.
    This is solve your purpose.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • ABUMN: Posting with trans.type 300 not possible (No acquisition posted)

    Hello everyone,
    I have seen a few threads on this topic, however I am still not finding a resolution to my issue.  I am very new to the FICO configuration scene and probably need a little more hand holding than the others who have asked this question.
    I am having and issue using ABUMN while transfering a Capital Investment Project (CIP Asset) under a asset class of AUC, to a standard fixed asset.  The CIP has been capitalized.  However, when I try to perform the transfer I am receiving the following error:
    Posting with trans.type 300 not possible (No acquisition posted)
    Message no. AA324
    Diagnosis
    Transaction type 300 belongs to a transaction type group, which can only be used to post to assets to which posting has already been performed. However, no postings have been made to this asset.
    Procedure
    Use a transaction type from a transaction type group, which can be used for the first acquisition to an asset.
    I have read through SAP NOTE 327088 (for retirements transfer variant 4) and it just doesn't help me with the issue.  I know it probably should, but I do not know enough about this process in order for it to make a whole lot of sense.
    If anyone can help me with this, it would be greatly appreciated.  Again, I am very new, so I will probably have several follow-up questions as well.
    Thanks in advance for the help!
    Rhonda

    Okay...
    I have finally figured this out on my own.
    When trying to transfer a capital investment project asset with an AuC class (asset under construction), ABUMN is not to be used.
    1st.  The internal order needs to be fully settled (KO02).  Create a settlement rule "FUL" for the designated fixed asset.
    2nd.  Run "Actual Settlement" run via KO88.
    This should transfer everything from the CIP asset to the fixed asset.  You can double check this via the S_ALR_87011967 - ... by Plant report.  Run this report prior to performing the steps above and the money will show in the CIP asset account, run it again after the above steps.  The CIP should be zeroed out and the fixed asset should now carry the amount.

  • ABUMN Intracompnay asset transfer error AA389 Transaction type 300 not pos

    Hello,
    I am getting the following error message while runinng ABUMN  Transaction type 300 not possible (no affiliated company specified) Message no.  AA389.  Transfer variant 4 (transfer within a company) code is set as follows
    Rel Type               Crs-sys.ar     Rel.crsyst area     trans me              retmt tr type   acq.trasn.typ
    1                                   *                generic entry              1                        300                 310
    2                                   *                 generic entry             2                        300                 310
    The problem is that on  t-code AO76   trans type 300  Posting type has "Post to affiliated company" and "Post gross" both checked on.  In Company Code Global Data my Company code and Company are the same.
    Transaction type 306 has posting type "Do not post to affiiliated co." and "Post net" checked on.
    I changed transfer variant 4  to have retmt transaction type of 306 for relationship type 1 and 2 instead of 300 and I do not get an error and the posted depriciation is updated correctly. 
    Since 300 is the recommended SAP setting in note 327088 would their be any problem if I leave it at 306?
    Thanks for any answers to this issue.

    Hello Murali,
    Thank you for your response.
    I created a new tranaction type which was a copy of 300 and clicked on
    Do not post to affiliated company
    Post Net
    Since 300 was set up for intercompany and it resolved my issue.
    Rgds,
    Dan

  • Issue in Depreciation Adjustment while Asset Transfer

    Hi,
    We have some old legacy assets which is capitalized in 2010 and depreciating for the last 4 years, These old  assets contain the value of several different assets and the usefull life of the old asset is 50 years, Now we need to segregate these old asset to different new assets , my process contains
    1) Creating new assets with different asset class with different usefull life
    2) Transfer the respective value from the main asset to the new assets
    3) Adjustment of depreciation already posted.
    Here i am facing some issues regarding the asset transfer , anybody suggest which is the best way to transfer the asset acquisition value to new assets ?
    when i am using ABUMN to transfer the values , system posting depreciation value adjustment which is the alredy posted depreciation for the past 4 years with the usefull life as 50 years. Is there any methode to adjust these value ?
    If i am posting Asset transfer with F-02 (with negative posting) , system will transfer the net book value and start the depreiation calculation based on the usefull life of the new asset. Here system is not considering the depreciation already posted.
    Is it possible to make changes in the system where assets will consider the depreciation start date as 2010 (old asset depreciation start date), If i am manually changing the depreciation start date then system is calculating the depreciation start date as 1st period of the current year (because previous years are alredy closed),
    instead of 5 years usefull life ,system depreciated the values with 50 years, i need to adjust the posted depreciation and when i create a new asset with usefull life of 5 years i need to manage the asset as already 4 years usefull life is expired.
    Is there any solution  ?
    Regards
    San

    Hi Ajay,
    Case : We have an asset 1000, which contains a value of $ 100000, it was capitalizes in 2010 with usefull life of 50 years and past 4 years depreciating with 50 years usefull life, This is a legacy asset and contains the value of so mny different assets.
    Now we need to create different assetd with different asset class and contains different usefull life, We need to transfer the value from Asset 1000 to these new created assets, here my concern is about the depreciation already posted to the asset 1000,
    Assume my new assets value is $ 20000, i can transfer the value from asset 1000 to my new created asset. but here depreciation should be a problem because last 4 years depreciation is calculated as 20000 @ 50 years , but actual usefull life was 5 years.
    Is there any methode to adjust the already posted depreciation.
    Regards
    San

  • ABUMN using multiple assets

    Hi experts,
    I am trying to process transaction ABUMN for about 100 assets.  When I click on the multiple assets button, only six lines appear.  The clipboard functionality does not appear to work.  The clipboard icon is greyed out.
    Does anyone know how to make the clipboard function work for this transaction so that I can cut and past all 100 assets in the transaction?  Or is there a better way to do this?
    Thanks.

    Hi Karen,
    I did the testing and what i understand that we need to paste 6 assets enter and scroll down paste another six assets and like that you need to post all assets.
    Then simulate it, you can see all asset values at a time.
    Still if you get any issues, pl let me know.
    Regards,
    Venkata Raju

  • ABUMN asset transfer

    Hey Guys,
    When doing an inter company asset transfer we are facing an issue as the current year depreciation for tax books remains on both the old and new asset. Before doing an asset transfer I could change the key to 0000 but in my copy controls I am copying the depreciation key to the new asset as well, so that will mean that the new asset will also get the key 0000 but I want the new key to use the original tax key that was assigned to the asset being transferred. How do you over come this issue?
    This problem is only for the tax books
    E.g. Asset 76333 is being transferred. key NA0
          Acquisition value            10000
          Accum Depreciation         5000
          Current year depreciation  200  ( half year convention)
       When I do an ABUMN- it copies all the information from the original asset
         New asset 76334
      Acquisition value    10000
      Accum depreciation 5000
      Current year dep     200
    The current year depreciation is being calculated for both the assets. If I change the key of the asset being retired to 0000 , then the new asset will also have key 0000.  I want the new asset to have current year depreciation of 200 but the old asset should have 0000.
    Please advice

    Hi,
    Your OAYZ settings will have priority over copy rules of dep key in AO21.
    Change your dep key as required and post ABT1N with that asset and give sending asset as reference asset. Since your new asset will copy settings from OAYZ for the dep area tab, but not from the copy rules of sending asset.
    I have tested too.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • ABUMN- Assets transfer between assets class within company

    hi
    i am using the T. code ABUMN for Assets transfer between one class to other with thin the same cpmpany  for the assets purchased during currenting year not posting give error message AA417, for old assets it is working.
    pls help to solve this issue
    thanks and regards

    Hello all,
    We are testing the transaction ABUMN in a system version ECC 6.0 with New G/L activated and, we have received an error message GLT2152 asking for an account determination...
    We have custumized the characteristics for general ledgers activating Zero balance & Mandatory field's flags for Profit center and, just Zero balance for the Segment; additionally we created and customized the Zero-balance Clearing Account.
    We also checked that all involved accounts were included in the "Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting" customizing icon and, that the document type generated by the asset transfer is included in the "Classify Document Types for Document Splitting" one...
    I personally think that perphaps the system finds that each Asset has a different Cost center (linked to their own profit centers and segments) so it stops and wonders which one most be derived for the splitting document... The zero balance clearing account could be the solution but, I don't know why it is not working...
    So, since there is not any SAP-Note nor info regarding this error message GLT2152, we appreciate any comment or guidance from you friends.
    Thanks a lot in advance and, best regards,
      Manuel

  • AAPO 176 Error in ABUMN transaction

    Hello Experts,
    I have a problem in ABUMN (Transfer within company code) transaction.
    In ABUMN, I choose "From cur.yr.acq" and partial transfer option.
    Then I got AAPO 176 error and it said "Transaction type 250 cannot be used for activity 'Retirement from intracompany transfer".
    But, I don't know where this message comes from and how to solve this issue.
    Thank you for your help in advance.
    BR,
    Chris Kim

    Hi,
    in my experience  following reasons:
    - Transfer variant: note 327088 Point a
    - Table TABWD: (SE16 TABWD TCODE  ABUM*) Note 196012
    - Transaction type: Tr. AO74 
    Regards Bernhard

  • ABUMN posting error

    Hi,
    When I am using ABUMN to tranfer one asset to another asset ordinary depreciation in value adjustments column is updated in 01 depreciation area. I need to update in the 10 depreciation area as well. But its not doing that...Please let me know is this SAP standard behaviour??  Any inputs are highly appreciated...

    There is an OSS Note that lists all the ABUMN variants, and explains how they work.
    You may not have set SAP to transfer from/to all depreciation areas, as someone hinted in answer.
    Another thing you must check is the ODep Start dates on sender and receiver, for both your DAs.
    View this on the Deprec areas tab, or on the Parameters tabs. 
    Since both areas show on the Deprec areas tab, I recommend it for easier viewing.
    To a certain degree, the APC is truly transferred - but an asset transfer is not really a transfer when it comes to accumulated depreciation.  This is said because the accumulated depreciation is actually recalculated for both assets after the ABUMN posts.  So run ASKB and AFAB.
    Remember that an AFAB Repeat may be necessary if the Planning run has already been processed for the month of transfer, yet before the transfer posted.
    It will look like an accumulated depreciation transfer if the ODep Starts are the same for all 4 settings. 
    This may not be your issue, but is worth a glance.  Regards

  • Problem with TX ABUMN

    Hi:
    I have some problem with Fixed assets accounting and I need some help.
    I have two fixed assets and I need to change their value and create a new one with the addition of these values I get from these two fixed assets. T
    I think Tx. ABUMN is the right one, but I get this error:
    u201CAccount 'Acc.dep. accnt.for ordinary depreciation' could not be foundu201D
    I have checked this account and it seems to be OK.
    Questions:
    Is TX ABUMN correct for this purpose?
    How I can solve this error?
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi,
    First set your COD with OAPL.
    Then go to OAY1, select Ttype 300 and click on Spl handling of transfer posting, there for all of your dep area select check box for Tranbsfer APC only.
    This will only transfer the APC value to the new assets.
    ABUMN is the only solution to your issue.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Error in ABUMN: Line Item Schema SAP_RET_XX0 is not defined

    Hello Guru,
    I have one problem when doing asset transfer (ABUMN) within same company code, because we want to drop some of depreciation areas. And in the new asset those depreciation areas are not existing. When I was trying to run ABUMN and simulate, the error came. Message no AC598 "Line Item Schema SAP_RET_XX0 is not defined". I tried to look in OSS Note, I found that error but the solution is for 4.0 while we are using 4.7 already but still the error is happening.
    Please share whether you ever faces the error like this before.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Dodi

    Hi,
    Please refer to Note 703302 - Error AC 598 SAP_RET_RU0 is missing if it helps.
    Summary
    Symptom
    Message AC 598 "Line item schemes are not found." is issued when trying to create assets postings with activity types 230, 300.
    Other terms
    SAP_RET_RU0 SAP_RET_RU1
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Line items schemes SAP_RET_RU1, SAP_RET_RU0 are incorrect. This is an error in the standard delivery for Russia.
    Solution
    Delete two records in the table T093H using transaction SE16 with the following data: LAND1 GLAFABER BWASL BUZSM
    RU    *        230   SAP_RET_RU1
    RU    *        300   SAP_RET_RU0
    Header Data
    Release Status: Released for Customer
    Released on: 03.02.2004  14:58:55
    Priority: Recommendations/additional info
    Category: Customizing
    Primary Component: XX-CSC-RU-FI Financial Accounting
    Secondary Components: XX-CSC-RU Russia
    Releases
    Release Independant

  • ABUMN - WBS is refreshed

    While doing settlement via transaction code ABUMN - the WBS element assigned to the now de-activated asset ( due to ABUMN ) is again refreshed. I've been going through SPRO since yesterday and still cant seem to point out the issue.

    Not answered

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

Maybe you are looking for

  • Documents not printing correctly

    We recently upgraded our marketing department from CS4 Design Standard to CS5.5 on to CS6 and now a printing problem has cropped up, starting in CS5.5. When printing a document with a lot on it most of the graphics are missing. The only way to get th

  • What would cause a hardrive failure?

    We turn on the computer and all it shows it a white screen with a blinking ? in a folder icon. Supposedly this means a hardrive failure? We didn't do anything out of the ordinary with our computer. Any ideas what would have caused this? Possibly a vi

  • Report for paid to vendors by cheaqe

    hi all fchn make me to know what all issued cheqes that only assigned with payment document no is there any report make me to know all paid document no and for who paid to even it assign with cheque no by fch5  or not

  • Questions about upgrading from Exchange 2010 RTM to Exchange 2010 Service Pack 3

    I am preparing to perform an maintenance upgrade on our current Exchange 2010 Server, to Service Pack 3 (and any post-SP3 roll ups), but I have a couple questions about the process. Current Exchange Server details: Exchange 2010 Standard Version: 14.

  • What's with the empty file

    Just finished cleaning out /etc of all the saved and obsolete files. What's with the empty file. arch-release. Does this serve a purpose or do send it to where the sun don't shine.