Account Assignment Changeable Indicator - OME9

Hi ,
Can someone explain what is the use of Account assignment changebale indicator in OME9 configuration.
I hav tried with material and service PO...if i chk or unchk this indicator in OME9 .....i dont see any difference during PO change.
Regards
Ratha

Hi
Account assignment changeable can be useful at time of invoice verification.
Ex: You did non-valuated GRN and expense was not yet booked to account assignment used in PO. Now at time of invoice posting, actual expense posting happens..now here you can change the account assignment category and can use true account for posting.
Thanks

Similar Messages

Changes in Purchasing Document Account Assignment during Goods Receipt

Hi MM Gurus,
Good day!
I just wanted to check with you on something that I came up while tinkering with SAP. Say, I have a PO with account assignment F for Order 1. Then during GR, I realized that I placed the wrong account assignment object, which should be Order 2. Can I execute this change during GR or do I have to do it either at the PO or IV level? In the standard MIGO setup, the Account Assignment tab is set to display. I tried checking the details for F in OME9 and found the Account Assignment changeable field. I tried enabling it but I still came up with the same result. I understand the logic behind why is it setup that way, but I want to make sure if there is any workaround for this
Hope you can respond the soonest.
Regards,

I our company (and many others I had contact to) the goods receipt is made by the porter or the warehouse people, in general from people different from the requestor. I mean the receipt is done at the central place where the goods arrive at the plant.
the internal distribution is made based on the GR slip which has all necessary information.
A warehouse guy, or even a porter (often from a external security service provider) should not be able to correct any financially relevant information.
A change of account assignment data may even be a conflict to existing approval strategies.
LIV is done by accountants, a totally different skill level compared with warehouse workers.

Account assignment for service item not copied from PR in PO

Hi,
We have a PR created for a service item from SRM. When we run ME59 it automatically creates the PO without issues by copying the account assignment details from the PR. The problem is as follows:
1. If we try to manually create a PO using ME21N from this PR, the account assignment is not getting copied from the PR but it throws the account assignment pop up screen where we manually have to enter the account assignment.
2. The client is using a Z transaction of ME59 which is copy of Me59 but with a few validations (nothing to do with Account assignment). This Z Tcode also fails to create the PO with the error 'no account assignment'. Indicating that the PR account assignment details are not getting copied.
Note: This is happening for all PR's irrespective of whether its created in SRM or created using ME51N.
Please let me know if someone has faced a similar issue
Thanks,
Lakshmi

Hi,
Please check first if notes 1085214 and 1102653
could solve the issue.
Regards,
Edit

Item categiry and account assignment

Hi all,
Hav we create any item categiries and account assignments.
if yes,what business process required
please clarify
siri

HI,
Item Categories are std. one. I guess we cant create new ones.
But you can create your own account assignment categories using OME9 transaction.
Also assign the new account assignment category to Std. Item Categories before carrying out a transaction.
Thanks & Regards,

MIRO, multi-account assignment, error message M8063,

When I do MIRO referring to a PO with multi-account assignment and Indicator GR-Based Invoice Verification is untick, I receive the following error message u201CDocument does not contain any items Message no. M8063 Diagnosis The document contains no posting lines with a value other than zerou201D.
But when I make a good receipt MIGO, so I can post my invoice correctly (MIRO).
The business process is to post a MIRO referring to a PO with multi-account assignment without a GR.
Thanks

the GR-Based Inv. Verif indicator in vendor master record is untick.
however, I can now post ,but before, in MIRO, I have to enter the quantities and the amounts in the multi account assignment dialog box (in MIRO, clic on the buton called Acct Assgt).
so the question now, why doesn t the system default the multi-account assignment from the PO?
thanks

Customizing for multiple account assignment in OME9

Hello,
We want to create a specific account category with different account assignment fields (cost center, WBS, order, etc).
This account category will be used for PO items with single account assignment or multiple account assignment.
One more information is this specific account category will be used only for PO replicated from Supplier Relationship Management. This means PO document type will not be created directly in R/3.
We use ECC6 with EhP4 with business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 active, so we make MAA for GR valuated.
According to those elements, iI would like to have confirmation regarding customizing we implemented, especially for fields:
- "Indicator: Account assignment screen" populated with value '2' (Multiple account assignment)
- "Distribution" empty (Single account assignment),
- "Partial Invoice" populated with value '2' (Apportion IR quantities to GR quantities proportionately).
While creating PO in SRM and after replication in R/3, cost distribution is done correctly for item with multiple account assignment (Account Assignment tab with Partial Inv. = "Distribute Proportionately" and Distribution = 1, 2 or 3, depending on cost distribution type chosen) whereas for item with single account assignment, Partial Inv. is "Derive from Account Assignment Category" and Distribution is "Single Account Assignment Category").
So, it seems OK. Nevertheless, i would like to have confirmation values i gave with above fields are correct in order to not have to change them later, i mean after PO were created, if problems occured.
Thank you for your help.
Regards.
Laurent.

Hello,
During PO replication from SRM to R/3, customizing from OME9 is not read and "Partial invoice indicator" is always defaulted to "1" when item has a multiple account assignment.
This behaviour can be overwritten by implementing:
- either BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI for method BBP_MAP_BEFORE_BAPI,
- or BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for method BBP_B46B_PO_OUTBOUND.
So, no need to take care of OME9 customizing.
Regards.
Laurent.

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

Set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment

Hi Guys,
Can you please help we with the solution to set deletion indicator in purchase requisition account assignment or close purchase requisition. A purchase requisition of $3.600.000,00 was created through Project system Network-External Processing and it has 2 duplicate network activities and $2.246.577,20 was converted to purchase order then $1,353,423 became the network remaining order plan. A purchase order service entry sheet was accepted and the invoice was created. Now Iu2019m experiencing problem when Iu2019m trying to change WBS element and Network system status to TECO in order to remove the remaining order plan of $1,353,423. Iu2019m getting error message number:06411 the procedure I have follow to correct the error is to reduce quantities in the account assignment item and delete superfluous account assignment by setting deletion in each case but I cannot do that because the fields are grey
Regards
Sandile

Hi,
please check first if the report ZMO_CORRECT_EBKN from note 739004 can correct the problem.
I would like to recommend you to check also the note 796973 whether the correction is avalilable in your coding, it should solve the issue.
In case the problem still persists, please open a ticket to get help from the primary support in area MM-SRV.
Regards,
Edit

ME57 - sort indicator 8 [by account assignment]

In ME57 we wish to use sort indicator as 8 [Sort by Account assignment] when executed
Its throwing an error dat 'Please enter valid sort indicator''
Is der any config around it, how we can fix this issue
Thanks

Hi Sasi,
This error is due to the coding and
also for note 205968, which is already applied in your system. It says,
that after its implementation, the indicator 8 is denied with an error
message. This has the effect that it can now be used in Transaction ME5K
only.
The reason why the indicator 8 is not used anymore in transaction ME57
is that the performance was bad, as it was necessary to read the table
EKBN many times.
You may use transaction ME5K with sort indicator 8 very well.
BR
Nadia Orlandi

GR non-valuated indicator controlled by the Account Assignment Category

Dear Gurus,
In standard customizing, is it possible to do a configuration so that the GR non-valuated indicator in the PO is controlled by the Account Assignment Category. For example:
1. For Acct Assignment Category = A (Asset), the GR non-valuated indicator is disabled (grey out)
2. All other Acct Assignment Categories, the GR non-valuated indicator is enabled (not grey out)
Appreciate your kind feedback.

Which checkbox or radio button specifically ?
It's not the 'GR non-valuated' checkbox or the 'GR non-val binding' checkbox right ?
I can't find any radio button for 'GR non-valuated' so that I can set it to 'display' or 'hide' either.
Perhaps I should elaborate a bit more:
Disabled = Box is grey out = Non Modifiable = Cannot tick even if you wanted to, Cannot untick even if you wanted to
Enabled = Box not grey out = Modifiable = Can tick if you wanted to, Can untick if you wanted to

Account assignment indicator cannot be removed (Error: CJ056)

Dear Experts,
I hope somebody can help me:
I want to assign a network activity to a wbs element - but I don't want that the wbs-element is an account assignment indicator.
I first thought that I could control that by the paramter "Control key" in the networt activity - but I still get message/error above (CJ056).
In this case I want to use the network acitivty only for Scheduling not for any "Cost-Activities".
I hope somebody can help me.
kind regards
nexus

I just created a new project to check if the status is the source of my problem.
But even with a new Project without any posted costs, it's not possible to remove the flag.
the error cj056 relats to the following check:
"The following assignments are checked:
network
network activity
Aufträge zum Projekt (Fertigungsauftrag, Innenauftrag, Instandhaltung)
Planauftrag"
Is it such a mandatory requirement that the flag is sent, when you assign a network acitivity to a wbs-element?
even when you use the network activity just for scheduling?
Edited by: nexus_123 on Aug 9, 2010 3:21 PM

Partial invoice indicator for multiple account assignment case

In ECC, the partial invoice indicator field (TWRKZ) has to be set when there are multiple account assignments for an item. But this field is not available in SRM account assignment section. So in SRM, when a PO is created with multiple account assignments for an item and transferred to ECC, error ("06"/"437") would be displayed -
Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt
Has anyone of you encountered such issue? Of course we can add this field in SRM PO Accounting as a custom field and map it later when transferring the PO to ECC, but it seems to be an obvious gap between SRM PO and ECC PO, wouldn't you think?
Thanks.

Hi! Thanks in advance!
Did you find the solution for this issue!!
Best Regards,
Gax

LIV for Purchase Orders with Account Assignment

Hi SAP Gurus,
I would like to get your expert advice on this...
I enabled total based invoice acceptance and reduction by performing the required configuration steps (define vendor tolerance group, set up the auto invoice reduction tolerance checks, assigned the tolerance group to the vendor). I was assuming that this would work for my purchase order which contains an account assignment. However, when I tested it out, instead of behaving as expected (create invoice and credit memo for the excess value), the system generated only 1 accounting document. The price variance was posted back to the account assignment assigned to the PO item.
Did I miss out on any steps? or is this the way SAP treats account assigned (non-stock) PO items (i.e. no invoice reduction occurs). If so, can you explain to me why?
Best regards,
RiVeR
Edited by: delo celo on Jul 14, 2010 6:16 PM

Hi Delo,
Please find answers to your queries below in bold.
1. I was just wondering why would SAP allow such transaction/s to happen? Wouldn't it compromise the integrity of the whole document trail (PO account assignment is different from the LIV)? -
There could be some business scenarios in some organisations, where in Procurement team uses generic cost centre (header), which is specific to particular department or group, to procure. But at the time of Invoice Receipt, AP team knows exact cost centre or order, etc to post the amounts. To cover these kind of scenarios, SAP probably has provided the option to change acount assignment.
2. Is there a way to edit the Account Assignment for a Purchase Order line item even if that item has been fully received and invoiced? -
These field changes at various levels can be configured via t-code OME9.
a) IR Changeable - This field if selected will allow to change the account assignment of a purchase order item at the time of invoice receipt.
b) Acct. assg. changeable - This field is selected will allow to change account assignment for an item following goods receipt or invoice receipt.
Hope this clarifies your queries.
-Ravi

Account assignment for Movement type 101

Hi,
Our SAP system prepopulates G/L account 500100 and non-changeable for PO's with A/c assingment category 'Y' - Third party sale. So, when we do a virtual Goods-receipt for this PO, it always posts to 500100.
I would like to make this field changeable by the user. How can I do it ??
Thanks
Suri

Hello Suresh,
Go to OME9, select account assignement category Y, click on details (F2), Flag mark "Account assig. Changable".
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

PO Account assignment category change blanks out GL account

When changing the AAC on a PO from 'I' to a 'U', for certain price conditions, the GL account gets blanked out. The OME9 setting for both I and U is 'GL account number field is mandatory'. This occurs even when no GR/IR have been performed on the PO. The error message ME083 - 'Enter GL Account' is thrown. Occurs in ME22N and when using BAPI_PO_ChANGE. Is this normal?
Thanks for your help.
-Sanjay

I think it is normal. There is a checkbox 'Derive acct. assgt.' in OME9. Here is the help text on this field.
If Inventory Management is not active in your system, you must specify (enter) the preliminary account assignments for all the items manually. Setting this indicator enables you to by-pass this step. You will then no longer get the dialog box for the entry of a preliminary account assignment.
You maintain the automatic account assignment specification facility using the Customizing functionality of Financial Accounting under Maintain automatic account determination.
Check the checkbox and see if it solves your issue. Apparently, checking this checkbox enables fetching the account from Maintain automatic account assignment config. table.

Account Assignment Changeable Indicator - OME9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for