Account Transformation Business Rules: Apply to YTD is not working

Hello Friends,
I am using Account Transformation Rules for Re-classification of Accounts in MS version of BPC. And i am trying to use Apply to YTD. But it is not working and i am getting the same periodic values in YTD column also. For example if i am running a report for Dec 2009, i am getting the only Dec 2009 values under YTD also.
I appreciate any ideas on resolving the issue.
Regards,
Mohan

Hi Nilanjan,
I observed the following:
1. If I check the Apply to YTD in Account Transformation rules, it is always showing YTD only irrespective of what i choose in in Measures in CV.
2. If i do not check the Apply to YTD in Account Transformation rules, it is showing only monthly values irrespectinve of what i choose in Measures in CV.
YTD is working fine in the same Appset for other dimension members eg not used in the Account Transformation Rules.(for other reports).
Thank you,
Mohan

Similar Messages

Calcaccount procedure - account transformation business rules

Hi I have a question concerning the calcaccount procedure.
I already made some Cashflow accounts
I already filled in some lines in the account transformation business rules
But now I was wondering how to run these business rules:
I have made the following calcaccount logic, but when I run it I get nothing for the moment
*XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=GLTOT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=C_WDP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY=E_TOTAL
*IGNORE_STATUS
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([FINANCE],[%CATEGORY_SET%],[C_WDP],[%SCOPETABLE%],[%LOGTABLE%],[CF])
*COMMIT
I don't have a clue if this logic is even correct or not
Please help me

Hi Alwin,
I tried this but it doesnt work
*XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=GLTOT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=C_WDP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY=E_TOTAL
*IGNORE_STATUS
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([FINANCE],[%CATEGORY_SET%],[C_WDP],[%SCOPETABLE%],[%LOGTABLE%])
*COMMIT
I have the following in the formula log:
Start time --->3:36:33 PM - Date:9/24/2008 (build code:254)
User:WDP\Administrator
Appset:WDP_ONTWIKKELING
App:FINANCE
Logic mode:1
Logic by:
Scope by:
Data File:
Debug File:D:\BPC\Data\Webfolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE\PrivatePublications\Administrator\TempFiles
DebugLogic_7_.Log
Logic File:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE
..\AdminApp\FINANCE\Calcaccount.lgx
Selection:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE\PrivatePublications\Administrator\TempFiles\FROM_7_.TMP
Run mode:1
Query size:0
Delim:,
Query type:0
Simulation:0
Calc diff.:0
Formula script:
Max Members:
Test mode:0
Is Modelling:1
Number of logic calls:1
Call no. 1, logic:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE
..\AdminApp\FINANCE\Calcaccount.lgx
signeddata is YTD
Building sub-query 1
Query Type:0
Max members:
Executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT [FINANCE],[ACTUAL],[C_WDP],[SPSCOPE_312035],[SPLOG_394894]
SPRunCalcAccount Version 2.06
2 Rows Calculated
2 Rows Updated
Time to run stored procedure:26.5 sec.
call 1 completed and data posted in 26.7 sec.
Run completed in 27.3 sec.
End time --->3:36:59 PM - Date:9/24/2008
As you can see he doenst post records to the cashflowaccounts..
Do you know what is wrong?

Currency Translation and Account Transformation Business Rules Together?

Hi I am fresh out of college and working on a BPC project. I have this working but fear down the road problems.
We are using currency translation and struggling with getting our NetIncome to write the correct value to the Current Year Retained Earnings when it converts from LC to USD; USD value did not match Net Income in P&L.
Initially, we did the Account Transformation first in our default logic only on LC, then FX runs and creates the corresponding USD value which does not match the Net Income.
It looks like the logic is correctly summing the YTD value but it converts using the AVG rate for the period (as opposed to multiplying each month by that monthu2019s average rate) creating a variance.
Weu2019ve moved the account transformation to run after FX and have it also running on USD. This currently works but seems like a workaround, and as we configure the remaining CTA rules will we run into problems?
Have any experts run into this issue before and what should I do?
Edited by: MichaelUCF2010 on Oct 12, 2010 10:18 PM

Hi, perhaps this is my lack of accounting knowledge rearing itself.
RE = BS = End (if you take into account translation adjustment for Net Income and Additions/Substractions & OB)
However If you are talking about the RE Reserve (and computing that correctly)
RE Reserve
OB - Opening
Inc - Avg
Sub - Avg
NI - Avg [I assume it is this line you are talking about - please try the apply periodic option for avg]
CTA - calculated
CB - End

Account transformation business rule

Hi experts,
I hace defined Account Transformation rule in the default.lgf file. and I have defined source and destionation account in the corresponding table.
Now I am running the rule from Data manager package - Default formula.It is running successfully.
But when I see Package log it is not executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT at all.
Would be great help if anyone can give some guidance.

Can you post the exact logic script?
Maybe a stupid guess, but did you put a *COMMIT directly after the *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE logic statement?
Regards,
Joost

Help PLEASE !!!!!!!!!! Accout Transformation Business Rule

Hi 
I am trying to use the account transformation Business Rule in BPC 7 for MS. I have stored data gainst the the following 
application = legal 
period = 2009.006 
category = Actual 
ConsolView = LC 
Intco = I_9005 
Measure = Periodic 
DataSourceL = input 
Account =650110 and 650115 
I have built a report to display this data and to display account 100000
 
My logic to call the rule is
 
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE=SPRUNCALCACCOUNT( '%APP%', 'ACTUAL' ,'LC', %SCOPETABLE%, '%LOGTABLE%', 'ABC',99 ) 
*Commit
 
I run my logic in debugger and in the Region tab I set Category to Actual and the Time to 2009.006
 
In the Business Rule I have a transformation group of ABC and in it I have two rows. I have tried many combinations of parameter values but generally I set the source account to 650110 and 650015 and the destination account to 100000 and leave all other fields empty.
 
When I run there are no error messages but no data is moved to account 100000.
 
The log contents are;
 
 
Start time --->5:01:13 PM - Date:26/06/2009 (build code:254)
 
 
 
User:EXTENDTEC\BPC_SYSADMIN
 
Appset:Austereo
 
App:Legal
 
Logic mode:1
 
Logic by:
 
Scope by:
 
Data File:
 
Debug 
File:C:\BPC\DATA\WebFolders\Austereo\Legal\PrivatePublications\BPC_SYSADMIN\TempFiles\DebugLogic.Log
 
Logic File:Acct Transform ABC.LGF
 
Selection:DIMENSION:Category|ACTUAL|DIMENSION:Time|2009.006|
 
Run mode:1
 
Query size:2
 
Delim:,
 
Query type:0
 
Simulation:0
 
Calc diff.:1
 
Formula script:
 
Max Members:
 
Test mode:0
 
Is Modelling:1
 
Number of logic calls:1
 
 
Call no. 1, logic:C:\BPC\DATA\WebFolders\Austereo\AdminApp\Legal\Acct Transform ABC.LGF
 
 
Building sub-query 1
 
 
Query Type:0
 
Max members:
 
Executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT 'Legal', 'ACTUAL' ,'LC', SPSCOPE_428552, 'SPLOG_486004', 'ABC',99
 
 
SPRunCalcAccount Version 7.0.112
 
 
Time to run stored procedure:.6 sec.
 
call 1 completed and data posted in 0.7 sec.
 
Run completed in 0.7 sec.
 
 
End time --->5:01:14 PM - Date:26/06/2009
 
 
I have spent two days trying to get this thing to work. Am I correct in assuming the purpose of this is to copy data from the source account to the destination account. Can somebody please tell me whether there are other factors that control a business rule.
 
I have spoken to most of the Australian BPC experts and none have successfully invoked the SPRUNCALCACCOUNT. I have read all available documentation and not found an explanation that sheds light on what I am doing wrong. Has anyone successfully used theis Business rule?
 
Thanks in advance
 

Hi Bronwen
Whether you included the System_contants.LGL and Consolidation_Library.LGL in the logic file.
*INCLUDE SYSTEM_CONSTANTS.LGL
*SYSLIB CONSOLIDATION_LIBRARY.LGL
Syntax used & its works.
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE=SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([%APP%],[ACTUAL],[LC],[%Scopetable%],[%Logtable%],[ABCC])
Give a try!
Note: Use the Square brackets [[%APP%]] in the syntax.
after posting this thread, syntax is showing as URL.
Cheers
Uma
Edited by: Uma Swaminathan on Jun 26, 2009 9:37 AM

File to RFC/IDOC with a set of business rules applied on every record

Hi experts,
i have a scenario where the following happens
checks need to be performed
1. Technical validations on the file picked up (Can be done through java programs)
2. Business rules to be applied on every record (Am not sure if this can be done in PI) Sample business rules - record id already present in the SAP system, check if some manadatory fields are missing in the record etc..quite a lot to be applied
I assume we use the File>PI>IDOC/RFC scenario for this..
However am not sure on how we apply the complex business rules on every record in file using PI.
Any suggestions??
Regards,
Kalyan

Hi My requirement as follow,
ELEMICA(CIDX)--->sap xi->SAP ECC,i receive CIDX Ordechange document from source system,when it is order change , the similr Order Chnage document available in DATA BASE,i need to retrive it from data base using some key fileds, i need to compare some of the fileds like PO Number,Buyer sequence number..like many fileds.if there is any change while validating then i need to send it SAP ECC Orders IDOC,IF TEH Values are same then i need to exit the process with mail to admin .
How i done my requiremnet i already explained,if you looking for any info let me know,but i never faced any problems like perfromace issues ...but writing JAVA Maping code is bit tough.
Regards,
Raj

How to create business rule for 'Integrity constraint - child not found'

Hello, I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.3.0.
When an integrity constraint is violated an error message coming from database is displayed in my application. In this case is the error "integrity constraint (TableName) violated - child record found "
How can I personalize the error shown in this case? I tried with EO business rules but I couldn't find this key, only "Key exists" or "UniqueKey".
Can anyone help?

Check Catch Me If You Can article. This should be handled there as one of the errors thrown in the model layer. Check the AdfmErrorHandlerImpl ...
Timo

Business Rules:Non-oracle db connections not shown in the ADF-BC Facts sect

Hi everyone
I'm working with Oracle BPM 11.1.1.5.0
JDeverloper: 11.1.1.5.0
Database : SQL Server 2008.
I'm trying to create some rules based on some value in my tables in the database.
The problem:
My non-oracle DB connections are not shown in my Business rule, in the ADF-BC Facts section on the Facts tab.
I have two oracle db connections and one SQL Server connection, and all three have been working perfectly before.
But in the business rules facts section, when I want to add a new ADF-BC fact, only the oracle connections are shown.
I have tried recreating all of them a few times, re registering my sqljdbc jar file, creating a new test application from scratch, but none seems to work.
Can some one give me any hint please?
Thanks in advance

has anyone else had this problem ?

Rule based Lead distribution is not working.

Hi friends,
I have created Lead distribution rule for assigment of Leads to Sales representative using below condition :
If
Lead Main Partner Postal Code Contains "12001"
Then
Partner by ID ( Assign Business Partner ID = Will Smith(BP id)
Set Partner Function To = Sales Representative
Set Lead Status To = In Process
Execution behavior = Stop after execution if partner(s) found )
I am using standard service Mgr Profile for lead distribution, when i am executing standard report CRM_DD_BATCH by giving values Object Type, Transaction Type and Service Mgr Profile it does not work i.e. assignment not happens but in addition to this if i mention specific Lead no. into report field ID it works perfectly.
I dont understand what i m missing, please help me if anyone has come across the same scenario.
Thanks in Advance,
Dipesh.

Hi Dipesh,
Have you ever fixed this issue? I have exactly similar problem...Appreciate if you can share the solution/root cause of this problem, if you found any. Thanks.

Business Objects 3.1 reports are not working with IE 10.

Hi,
Recently I upgraded my internet explorer to IE10.. Since then business objects 3.1 reports are not opening in IE10.0
Getting error message "webpage can't be found".
I am not sure whether BO 3.1 reports work with IE 10.0 or not.
Please advise
Thanks
Sat

Did you try with other browsers ?
IE 10 (Compatibility View display mode) with Oracle Java 6 / Oracle Java 7 is supported for BOXI3.1 SP6.
Please check the PAM for details of your SP level.

Updating extended fields in SRM Business Partner Web Dynpro UI does not work

Hey community,
I'd like to extend the SAP SRM Business Partner Web Dynpro (SRM 7.13). I did it like in SAP Note 1386310 described. Everything works fine, the fields show the correct data. But updating these fields does not have any effect.
I only want to extend the existent fields NAME_ORG3 and NAME_ORG4. I did the following steps:
- Because of the fact that the fields are existent and not custom, I skipped the extension of structures INCL_EEW_BUT000 and INCL_EEW_BUT000_X (ok, in utter despair I even tried this, but of course I got the message "fields already exist...")
- I added the 2 fields to the SRM business partner data transfer structure INCL_EEW_BP_CSF_COMPANY_DATA.
- In Web Dynpro /SAPSRM/WDC_MODC_NAME, view V_PS_OIF_NAME I added the fields NAME_ORG3 and NAME_ORG4 to the context node COMPANY_DATA
- I added corresponding Input fields and labels to the WD layout.
- in view /sapsrm/v_mdfsbc I customized the new fields
-> the new fields are visible in the WD, and, oh wow, they even show the correct data!
-> Unfortunately, updating the fields does not work, but000 does not get any data.
Debugging the function "bupa_central_extincl_change" brings up, that function BUP_MEMORY_BUT000_GET gets a but000 structure with filled NAME_ORG1 and NAME_ORG2, but NAME_ORG3 and NAME_ORG4 are empty.
I also regarded SAP Note 1453747, but the code was already right.
Any Ideas? Many thanks in advance!
Steffi

Hi Stefanie Krause,
I am also facing the same problem
I added the one fields "APPROVAL_EMAIL” to the SRM business partner, data transfer structure '/SAPSRM/S_CLL_BP_COMPANY_DATA ' . I have appended the structure.
I added corresponding Input fields and labels to the WD layout.
-> the new fields are visible in the WD,
-> i am able to visible the input field in WD,
But if add some value press on next tab and back to the screen the value will be refreshed .
Kindly help me
Thanks and Regards,
Maruthi.M

SBS 2011 GPO for changing the default save path applying to Win7 but not working

So this is a strange one. I've got an SBS 2011 server that's the only domain controller in the org. I've created a GPO to change the default save location for Excel 2013 and Word 2013 using the Office 2013 ADMX files which were installed to the PolicyDefinitions
folder.
The GPO (U-Office2013 Default Save Location) only contains:
1. User Configuration - Microsoft Excel 2013/Excel Options/Save - Default file location - Enabled - Z:\
2. User Configuration - Microsoft Word 2013/Word Options/Advanced/File Locations - Default file location - Enabled - Z:\
The GPO is linked at the OU that contains my users for my SBS organization.
When I do a gpupdate /force on a windows 7 system with office2013 installed, and then run a gpresult/rsop, the policy appears to be applied successfully as it lists my GPO under the Applied GPOs list on the workstation:
Applied GPOs
Default Domain Policy dyndns.local AD (24), Sysvol (24)
U-Office2013 Default Save Location domain.local/SBSusers AD (6), Sysvol (6)
In the gpresult report, the applied settings appear under:
Administrative Templates
Extra Registry Settings
software\policies\microsoft\office\15.0\excel\options\defaultpath Z:\ U-Office2013 Default Save Location
software\policies\microsoft\office\15.0\word\options\doc-path Z:\ U-Office2013 Default Save Location
BUT, when I go to the workstation, and check office->options-Save-default file path, the path has not been changed to what the GPO is pushing.
The strange thing is that in my test environment running 2008R2 server and Win7 with Office 2013 and identical settings the default save location is applied and works as expected.
Any ideas?
I've already tried re-installing the ADMX templates and re-created the GPO's several times.
Thanks in advance.

When a group policy is not applying, it is often that it has been linked to the wrong OU. Please first check this.
You might also check the apply status on the client site based on the GPSVC.log.
How to enable GPO logging:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/csstwplatform/archive/2010/11/09/how-to-enable-gpo-logging-on-windows-7-2008-r2.aspx
It looks more like an issue on server side than an issue of Office Group Policy settings. Try to post in Server forum and see if there is any luck:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home?category=windowsserver

TS3367 my facetime as stopped working i have a new iphone c set up to my apple account but i also have an ipad set up with the same account is this the reason my facetime is not working. When i get someone to facetime me both ipad and iphone try to conne

I use facetime on my ipad and i now have a new iphone c, when setting up my iphone i set it to the same apple account as the ipad, I now cannot use facetime I have tried to facetime a friend and I have also asked them to facetime me but when they do both iphone and ipad try to connect but both fail. Can you have more than one iso device logged into the same account.

Yes, I have both my iPhone and my iPad logged in all the time. Have you tried logging out and then logging back in? Here is an article that may help:
iOS: Troubleshooting FaceTime

Microsoft home and business 2013 64-bit Product Key not working to activate.

Hi,
I just bought on ebay india. ( MS office home and business 2013 64-bit) During activation the screen says that there was problem.
Your computer has already installed 64-bit files and 32-bit cannot install. To install 32-bit please delete the files and reinstall.
I went to chat with Microsoft website and they advised to post the issue here. Is there someone who can help me activate the product. I contact the seller, he says I have sent you 64-bit installation cd.
Thank you,

Hi,
Have you installed any 64-bit Office products before? If yes, please uninstall them using Fix it from Microsoft:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2739501/en-us
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971179
Try installing again, check the result.
If you are not sure whether you are running 32-bit or 64-bit Office, please refer to this article below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/support/am-i-running-32-bit-or-64-bit-office-HA010361023.aspx
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support

View Account under Cellular Data in iPad Air Settings not working

I purchased a new iPad Air with cellular last week and successfully established an account with Verizon on the iPad. Up until Saturday I was able to sign into View Account on the iPad in Settings and saw that my usage amount stayed current. I also was able to create a sign-on on the Verizon website and login with no problem up until Saturday. Beginning Saturday View Account on the iPad says my sign in credentials are incorrect. I know they are correct. Not only that the Verizon website says "the activity you are attempting is not available" when I try to sign there. Because Verizon is not offering unlimited usage I need to closely monitor because my teenagers have been using the iPad. I called Verizon and they blamed Apple and said contact them. This does not seem like an Apple issue to me. Anyone else experiencing this? If I go over my usage limit, it's expensive.

Yes I installed the MyVerizon app and returns an error.
I been searching around the Internet and everyone is saying that after you initially activate with one carrier on the iPad Air you can remove the SIM and replace with another from a different carrier. According to one article, Apple engineers included a wide range of bands for the iPad Air. Here's the article: http://gigaom.com/2013/11/01/ipad-air-with-lte-tip-you-can-switch-carrier-sims-a t-will/

Account Transformation Business Rules: Apply to YTD is not working

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for