Help PLEASE !!!!!!!!!! Accout Transformation Business Rule

Hi<br>
I am trying to use the account transformation Business Rule in BPC 7 for MS. I have stored data gainst the the following <br>
application = legal<br>
period = 2009.006<br>
category = Actual<br>
ConsolView = LC<br>
Intco = I_9005<br>
Measure = Periodic<br>
DataSourceL = input<br>
Account  =650110 and 650115<br>
I have built a report to display this data and to display account 100000
<br>
My logic to call the rule is
<br>
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE=SPRUNCALCACCOUNT( '%APP%', 'ACTUAL' ,'LC',  %SCOPETABLE%, '%LOGTABLE%', 'ABC',99 )<br>
*Commit
<br>
I run my logic in debugger and in the Region tab I set Category to Actual and the Time to 2009.006
<br>
In the Business Rule I have a transformation group of ABC and in it I have two rows. I have tried many combinations of parameter values but generally I set the source account to 650110 and 650015 and the destination account to 100000 and leave all other fields empty.
<br>
When I run there are no error messages but no data is moved to account 100000.
<br>
The log contents are;
<br>
<br>
Start time --->5:01:13 PM  -  Date:26/06/2009  (build code:254)
<br>
<br>
<br>
User:EXTENDTEC\BPC_SYSADMIN
<br>
Appset:Austereo
<br>
App:Legal
<br>
Logic mode:1
<br>
Logic by:
<br>
Scope by:
<br>
Data File:
<br>
Debug <br>
File:C:\BPC\DATA\WebFolders\Austereo\Legal\PrivatePublications\BPC_SYSADMIN\TempFiles\DebugLogic.Log
<br>
Logic File:Acct Transform ABC.LGF
<br>
Selection:DIMENSION:Category|ACTUAL|DIMENSION:Time|2009.006|
<br>
Run mode:1
<br>
Query size:2
<br>
Delim:,
<br>
Query type:0
<br>
Simulation:0
<br>
Calc diff.:1
<br>
Formula script:
<br>
Max Members:
<br>
Test mode:0
<br>
Is Modelling:1
<br>
Number of logic calls:1
<br>
<br>
Call no. 1, logic:C:\BPC\DATA\WebFolders\Austereo\AdminApp\Legal\Acct Transform ABC.LGF
<br>
<br>
Building sub-query 1
<br>
<br>
Query Type:0
<br>
Max members:
<br>
Executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT  'Legal', 'ACTUAL' ,'LC',  SPSCOPE_428552, 'SPLOG_486004', 'ABC',99
<br>
<br>
SPRunCalcAccount Version 7.0.112
<br>
<br>
Time to run stored procedure:.6 sec.
<br>
call 1 completed and data posted in 0.7 sec.
<br>
Run completed in 0.7 sec.
<br>
<br>
End time --->5:01:14 PM  -  Date:26/06/2009
<br>
<br>
I have spent two days trying to get this thing to work. Am I correct in assuming the purpose of this is to copy data from the source account to the destination account. Can somebody please tell me whether there are other factors that control a business rule.
<br>
I have spoken to most of the Australian BPC experts and none have successfully invoked the SPRUNCALCACCOUNT. I have read all available documentation and not found an explanation that sheds light on what I am doing wrong. Has anyone successfully used theis Business rule?
<br>
Thanks in advance
<br>

Hi Bronwen
Whether you included the System_contants.LGL and Consolidation_Library.LGL in the logic file.
*INCLUDE SYSTEM_CONSTANTS.LGL
*SYSLIB CONSOLIDATION_LIBRARY.LGL
Syntax used & its works.
*RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE=SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([%APP%],[ACTUAL],[LC],[%Scopetable%],[%Logtable%],[ABCC])
Give a try!
Note: Use the Square brackets [[%APP%]] in the syntax.
after posting this thread, syntax is showing as URL.
Cheers
Uma
Edited by: Uma Swaminathan on Jun 26, 2009 9:37 AM

Similar Messages

  • Calcaccount procedure - account transformation business rules

    Hi I have a question concerning the calcaccount procedure.
    I already made some Cashflow accounts
    I already filled in some lines in the account transformation business rules
    But now I was wondering how to run these business rules:
    I have made the following calcaccount logic, but when I run it I get nothing for the moment
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=GLTOT     
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=C_WDP     
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY=E_TOTAL     
    *IGNORE_STATUS     
    *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([FINANCE],[%CATEGORY_SET%],[C_WDP],[%SCOPETABLE%],[%LOGTABLE%],[CF])     
    *COMMIT     
    I don't have a clue if this logic is even correct or not
    Please help me

    Hi Alwin,
    I tried this but it doesnt work
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO=GLTOT     
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS=C_WDP     
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY=E_TOTAL     
    *IGNORE_STATUS     
    *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCALCACCOUNT([FINANCE],[%CATEGORY_SET%],[C_WDP],[%SCOPETABLE%],[%LOGTABLE%])     
    *COMMIT     
    I have the following in the formula log:
    Start time --->3:36:33 PM  -  Date:9/24/2008  (build code:254)
    User:WDP\Administrator
    Appset:WDP_ONTWIKKELING
    App:FINANCE
    Logic mode:1
    Logic by:
    Scope by:
    Data File:
    Debug File:D:\BPC\Data\Webfolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE\PrivatePublications\Administrator\TempFiles
    DebugLogic_7_.Log
    Logic File:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE
    ..\AdminApp\FINANCE\Calcaccount.lgx
    Selection:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE\PrivatePublications\Administrator\TempFiles\FROM_7_.TMP
    Run mode:1
    Query size:0
    Delim:,
    Query type:0
    Simulation:0
    Calc diff.:0
    Formula script:
    Max Members:
    Test mode:0
    Is Modelling:1
    Number of logic calls:1
    Call no. 1, logic:D:\BPC\Data\WebFolders\WDP_ONTWIKKELING\FINANCE
    ..\AdminApp\FINANCE\Calcaccount.lgx
    signeddata is YTD
    Building sub-query 1
    Query Type:0
    Max members:
    Executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT [FINANCE],[ACTUAL],[C_WDP],[SPSCOPE_312035],[SPLOG_394894]
    SPRunCalcAccount Version 2.06
    2 Rows Calculated
    2 Rows Updated
    Time to run stored procedure:26.5 sec.
    call 1 completed and data posted in 26.7 sec.
    Run completed in 27.3 sec.
    End time --->3:36:59 PM  -  Date:9/24/2008
    As you can see he doenst post records to the cashflowaccounts..
    Do you know what is wrong?

  • Help with Creating a Business Rule...

    Hi All,
    I am using Planning 11.1.1.1.0.
    I have created a classic planning application and now have to incorporate a way to copy data from one slice of the essbase db to other.
    I am trying to copy data from the following slice
    Entity : EasternZone
    Version:Working (Bottom Up)
    Scenario: Actuals
    Currency:USD
    Period:YearTotal
    Year: 2007
    to
    Entity : EasternZone
    Version:Working (Bottom Up)
    Scenario: Actuals
    Currency:USD
    Period:YearTotal
    Year: 2008 and increase by a certain percentage which is not fixed..
    How should i go about achieving this using business rules? (Calc manager is used with only EPMA applications so where do i create the business rule?) Can somebody share some ideas please?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Kind Regards.
    Alicia

    Hi!
    Are you transferring data in same application from db to another? If yes, then possibly you could use @xref function.
    for example :
    fix ("EasternZone", "Working","Actuals","USD","YearTotal")
    "2008" = @xref("_name of source db location alias_","2007")*[RunTimePrompt for percentage];
    endfix
    The name of the location alias you can find from destination db --> edit --> location aliases. There you can see the location alias name of the source db.
    if you want to be sure about block creation then you could also add the following rows at the beginning
    /*fix ("EasternZone", "Working","Actuals","USD","YearTotal","any account")*/
    /* "2008" = 0;*/
    /*endfix*/
    kind regards,
    user637777

  • Account transformation business rule

    Hi experts,
    I hace defined Account Transformation rule in the default.lgf file. and I have defined source and destionation account in the corresponding table.
    Now I am running the rule from Data manager package - Default formula.It is running successfully.
    But when I see Package log it is not executing SPRUNCALCACCOUNT at all.
    Would be great help if anyone can give some guidance.

    Can you post the exact logic script?
    Maybe a stupid guess, but did you put a *COMMIT directly after the *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE logic statement?
    Regards,
    Joost

  • Currency Translation and Account Transformation Business Rules Together?

    Hi I am fresh out of college and working on a BPC project. I have this working but fear down the road problems.
    We are using currency translation and struggling with getting our NetIncome to write the correct value to the Current Year Retained Earnings when it converts from LC to USD; USD value did not match Net Income in P&L.
    Initially, we did the Account Transformation first in our default logic only on LC, then FX runs and creates the corresponding USD value which does not match the Net Income.
    It looks like the logic is correctly summing the YTD value but it converts using the AVG rate for the period (as opposed to multiplying each month by that monthu2019s average rate) creating a variance.
    Weu2019ve moved the account transformation to run after FX and have it also running on USD. This currently works but seems like a workaround, and as we configure the remaining CTA rules will we run into problems?
    Have any experts run into this issue before and what should I do?
    Edited by: MichaelUCF2010 on Oct 12, 2010 10:18 PM

    Hi, perhaps this is my lack of accounting knowledge rearing itself.
    RE = BS = End (if you take into account translation adjustment for Net Income and Additions/Substractions & OB)
    However If you are talking about the RE Reserve (and computing that correctly)
    RE Reserve
    OB - Opening
    Inc - Avg
    Sub - Avg
    NI - Avg [I assume it is this line you are talking about - please try the apply periodic option for avg]
    CTA - calculated
    CB - End

  • Account Transformation Business Rules: Apply to YTD is not working

    Hello Friends,
    I am using Account Transformation Rules for Re-classification of Accounts in MS version of BPC. And i am trying to use Apply to YTD. But it is not working and i am getting the same periodic values in YTD column also. For example if i am running a report for Dec 2009, i am getting the only Dec 2009 values under YTD also.
    I appreciate any ideas on resolving the issue.
    Regards,
    Mohan

    Hi Nilanjan,
    I observed the following:
    1. If I check the Apply to YTD in Account Transformation rules, it is always showing YTD only irrespective of what i choose in in Measures in CV.
    2. If i do not check the Apply to YTD in Account Transformation rules, it is showing only monthly values irrespectinve of what i choose in Measures in CV.
    YTD is working fine in the same Appset for other dimension members eg not used in the Account Transformation Rules.(for other reports).
    Thank you,
    Mohan

  • Help Please ! -- transform XML to HTML using xslt tag in JSP

    Hello,
    I have problem to do XSL transform in JSP.
    I have an XSL : test.xsl
    I have an XML : test.xml
    In JSP I have:
    <x:xslt media="html" xml="test.xml">
    <x:stylesheet media="html" uri="test.xsl" />
    </x:xslt>
    But It doesn't work the way it suppose to. What is wrong in my code ? I followed the URL http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/xml/xml_apps.html
    Thanks in advance,
    Christina

    Basically:
        try{
          //Setting up parameters.
          xml=new StreamSource(new File(xmlInput));
          xsl=new StreamSource(new File(xslInput));
          baos=new ByteArrayOutputStream();
          htmlResult=new StreamResult(baos);
          //Transform input(xml, xsl) onto html output.
          TransformerFactory tfactory=TransformerFactory.newInstance();
          Transformer transformer=tfactory.newTransformer(xsl);
          transformer.transform(xml, htmlResult);
          baos.writeTo(out);
          //System.err.println(htmlResult.getOutputStream().toString());
        catch(...){
        }I havent tested and I havent use this for a while, but I hope this can serve as a staring point.
    Regards,
    OO

  • Business Rules for Account Transformation - Execute a Transformation Group

    Hello,
    when executing a package for account transformation, I want to select a specific transformation group
    only.
    The transformation group is the first column in the definitions.
    My question:
    Can I pass this to script logic as a parameter?
    What is it like?
    I think this should have a performance effect when using account transformation in default logic.
    Thanks for an answer
    Jochen

    Hi Jochen,
    Your best bet is the documentation at [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bpc75_nw/helpdata/en/2b/8f059920de465b88be2893e2117fbe/frameset.htm], however in this case it does not do a very good job of explaining what is happening. Fortunately the CALC= property is just about the only one that you have control over for the account transformation business rules.
    The other option (and the only way to truly know what is going on) is to investigate the ABAP programs that actually execute the business rule logic in BW. You can find these programs in SE80, under the UJ package, in the UJP sub-package. You will be most interested in the classes available there. There tends to be one class per business rule group, as well as classes for allocations and validations.
    Cheers,
    Ethan

  • BUSINESS RULES FOR Vendor, Customer & PRODUCT

    Hi,
    Can any one help me to provide Business Rules(Validation Rules) of Vendor, Customer & Product domain to be considered in integrating with other technologies.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Giri

    Hi Joseph,
    First tell me how you want to maintain Inventory size wise?? If it is your A is Length, B is Width and C is your Height and you are not maintaining size wise stock then use Length,Width and Height which is in Item master here you can set fix values and activate same columns in document and you can change it in document. But in this case you cannot maintain size wise stock
    If you are maintaining stock size wise then you have to create new item code every time.
    You cannot use BP catalog number for this.
    Thanks
    Sachin

  • BUSINESS RULES FOR PRODUCT

    Hi,
    Can any one help me to provide Business Rules(Validation Rules) of Product domain to be considered in integrating with other technologies.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Giri

    BPM and a rules engine are different. Both are important, but they have different uses.
    Oracle BPM Studio is used by Business Analysts and Developers to model processes, integrate underlying components (including business rules) and develop user interfaces.
    There's an Engine that executes the processes that have been modeled. It sends the work item instances to the right person or persons with the right data when the work item reaches an interactive activity in the process. Similarly the Engine has invokes the underlying components specified in the process when the work item instance reaches an automatic activity.
    There's an out of the box Workspace runtime that lets end users manage and run their work item instances as they flow throughout the processes.
    We can business rules inside the processes, but one does not replace the other.
    Dan

  • BRF - Business Rules Framework - getting started

    Hi,
    I'm trying to set up a rule using the BRF. Has anyone set up a simple rule with tcode BRF? What are the steps to follow?
    Any suggestions will be appreciated.
    regards,
    Bert

    Hello Bert.
    I have come across a few good SAP HELP documentations,
    [SAP HELP Library - Standard Reference - Business Rule Framework (BRF)|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/dc/38bb4006d9cc38e10000000a155106/frameset.htm]
    [SAP HELP Library - Standard Reference - First Steps Towards Your Own BRF Application|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/49/0f2541a2d5b167e10000000a155106/content.htm]
    Hope this is what your looking for.
    Good Luck & Regards.
    Harsh Dave

  • Can I ReUse business rule with JHeadStart ?

    Hi All,
    I am looking for tools and methods for our development team to achieve this goal. The keyword is Re-Use as far as we can, in all application layer.
    We will have core application, and for any new customer we will only develope the things that specific to that customer and Re-use the core application.
    Will JHeadStart help us to achieve that goal ?
    Could anybody pls help me with the scenario for maximum reUse ?
    Thank you for your help,
    Krist

    Krist,
    JHeadstart does not 'help' much with your business rule implementation, but it also does not prevent it (I'll get to the bugs you mentioned later). ADF BC is an excellent framework for implementing your business rules, and if you implement these rules on Entity Objects (instead of View Objects) as much as you can, they are highly reusable. Have a look at this paper, which is from the 'before ADF' era but will still contain lots of information on how to implement various types of Business Rules in ADF BC:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/bc4j/BusinessRulesInBc4j.pdf
    The JHeadstart bugs you mention should not hinder you (much). The first should not reproduce in the latest patch version; you can create your own application module subclass as long as it (directly or indirectly) extends the JHeadstart one.
    The bug with respect to View Object extending does not mean the Java class extending of the View Object classes, but rather the situation where one View Object 'inherits' the attribute definitions of another View Object. I would not advice using this type of 'definition inheritance', and furthermore implementing business rules on View Objects should be avoided as much as possible if re-use is your goal; the Entity Objects underneath the View Objects are a much better location.
    The bug with imported Entity Object is more a restriction in how you organise your sources in JDeveloper (i.e. spreading your Business Components across multiple projects) than it is a limitation on reusing business logic.
    Kind regards,
    Peter Ebell
    JHeadstart Team

  • HI John: Advise for Business Rule or Calc Script

    Hi John,
    I need your Advice regarding Business Rule as earlier i took all ur advice seriously and also succeeded; This is toughest area for me.
    1) Any useful document which help me to understand Business Rule apart from HBR admin pdf ?
    1) Any Blog/Source/PDF/PPT especially for Planning Business Rule ?
    Thanks for any Help.
    Regards
    N Kumar

    Hi,
    Well business rules are really just calc scripts with a few additional features.
    So to understand business rules a good place to start is looking at calc script functions and commands, the essbase technical reference includes details on all this :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10530_01/doc/epm.931/html_esb_techref/techref.htm
    If you get stuck on calc scripts then the essbase forum is also a good place to ask for advice as there are many experts on there.
    I have not seen many sources for information relating to just business rules.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • BPC NW - Error in Business Rule for Account transformation rule table

    hi
    I have given the Account transformation Rule to move Amount from Account A to Account B and then I have given the following script logic in the default script
    **RUN_PROGRAM CALC_ACCOUNT*
    *CATEGORY = Category*
    *CURRENCY = RptCurrency*
    *TID_RA = %TIME_SET%*
    *CALC=A*
    *OTHER = ENTITY=C1000*
    **ENDRUN_PROGRAM*
    But when I try to load data through Input schedule in Account A and expect amount to transfer to Account B, I m getting an error
    Book Name:Book4
    Application : PLANNING*
    Status : Failed*
    Submitted Count : 1*
    Accepted Count : 1*
    Rejected Count : 0*
    - Error Message -*
    Error running default logic (Business rules are not available)
    - Rejected record list -*
    Error converting records: The root element is missing.
    Can someone please advice me what to do ....

    hi Marcel,
    Lot of thanks for your answer.
    But I have used your logic after removing GROUPS as I dont have GROUPS dimension in my application.
    *RUN_PROGRAM CALC_ACCOUNT
    CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
    TID_RA = %TIME_SET%
    CALC=FX
    OTHER = [ENTITY=%ENTITY_SET%]
    *ENDRUN_PROGRAM
    This is the error I m getting
    Book Name:Book3
         Application     :     PLANNING
         Status          :     Failed
         Submitted Count     :     1
         Accepted Count     :     1
         Rejected Count     :     0
              - Error Message -
    Error running default logic (Business rules are not available)
              - Rejected record list -
    Error converting records: The root element is missing.
    Can you please advice
    a) Does it mean some issue with my client installation as I dont see these LGF files. I even dont see the data folder in which lgf files are supposed to be present
    b) Where to find information for this interface CALC_ACCOUNT? How did you decide to use 'FX' and how do you know which dimensions to use. Like I dont have GROUPS.
    Please give me your comments.
    regards
    Gaurav

  • Why not allow Business Rule Design Transformer to overwrite existing BRDDs

    Hi,
    It can be quite annoying during development to continually having to remove the BRDD Trigger and PL/SQL Definition when running the BR Design Transformer reveals missing information in the BR Analysis definition. It seems that it would be practical to have at least the option to have the Business Rule Design Transformer overwrite an existing Business Rule Design Definition.
    You could think of an additional parameter in this utilily labeled "Overwrite existing BRDD?" with allowable values Y(es) and N(o) with No as default (so that the default functionality is the same as before).
    Below you find the code that can be added to the HSU_BRTR package to realize such a functional improvement. Maybe you can consider it for a next release...?!
    best regards,
    Lucas Jellema
    AMIS Services BV
    code to add to HSU_BRTR to provide a parameter that allows the user to specify whether or not the HSU_BRTR is allowed to overwrite an existing BRDD:
    in the revision history:
    09-jan-2003 Lucas Jellema
    6.5.2.3AMIS1.1 Added new parameter and supporting code that allows user to indicate
    whether existing Business Rule Design Definitions may be/should be overwritten
    at the end of procedure install
    hsu_install.add_parameter
    ( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
    , 40 -- sequence
    , 'Overwrite existing BRDDs?' -- prompt
    , 'N' -- default value actual
    , 'No' -- default value displayed
    , 'Y' -- mandatory
    , 'N' -- allow multi-select
    , 'N' -- include shared elements
    , '' -- element type short name
    , '' -- sql expression actual
    , '' -- sql expression displayed
    , null -- where clause
    , null -- synchronize with
    , null -- foreign key column
    , -- help text
    'Choose whether you want this utility to overwrite existing Business Rule Design Definitions.'
    hsu_install.add_allowable_value
    ( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
    , 40 -- parameter
    , 1 -- sequence
    , 'Y' -- actual value
    , 'Yes' -- displayed value
    hsu_install.add_allowable_value
    ( PACKAGE_NAME -- package name
    , 40 -- parameter
    , 2 -- sequence
    , 'N' -- actual value
    , 'No' -- displayed value
    --------6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
    Just before procedure transform_stage2
    procedure delete_brdds
    ( p_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
    , p_br_name in varchar2
    -- Purpose Delete existing Business Rule Design Definition
    -- Usage from run procedure
    -- Remarks Find PL/SQl Module Definition based on Business Rule Label
    is
    cursor c_brdd
    ( b_tbl_id in ci_table_definitions.id%type
    , b_br_name in varchar2
    is
    select trg.id trg_id
    , trg.name name
    , plm.id plm_id
    from ci_database_triggers trg
    , ci_plsql_modules plm
    where trg.table_definition_reference = b_tbl_id
    and trg.plsql_module_reference = plm.id
    and plm.name = b_br_name
    begin
    -- loop over journalling busrules of this application
    <<brdd>>
    for r_brdd in c_brdd(p_tbl_id, p_br_name) loop
    -- delete busrule (delete of trigger is since 6i not enough anymore, so
    -- explicitly delete PL/SQL module also)
    bllog.write
    ( 'Deleting trigger '||r_brdd.name||' and PL/SQL module '
    ||hsu_name.get_name_and_path(r_brdd.plm_id)
    ||', a new business rule design definition overwrites this old one.'
    , bllog.information
    bltrg.del(r_brdd.trg_id);
    blplm.del(r_brdd.plm_id);
    end loop brdd;
    end delete_brdds;
    inside procedure transform_stage2
    (just before the comment: -- check if BRDD with this plm_name already exists)
    if p_overwrite_br = 'Y'
         then
    delete_brdds
    ( p_tbl_id => g_trg_tbl(i).tbl_id
    , p_br_name => l_plm_name
         end if; -- find_trg and overwrite =Y
    A new parameter in procedure transform_br_fun
    procedure transform_br_fun
    , p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default 'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
    use the parameter p_overwrite_br in the call to transform_stage2
    transform_stage2
    ( p_fun_id => p_fun_id
    , p_fun_label => r_fun.fun_function_label
    , p_fun_short_definition => r_fun.fun_short_definition
    , p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
    , p_msg_language => p_msg_language
    , p_rule_type => l_rule_type
                   , p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
    new parameter p_overwrite_br in the procedure run
    NOTE: in both PACKAGE SPECIFICATION and BODY
    , p_overwrite_br in varchar2 default'N' -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1
    use the parameter p_overwrite_br in all calls to transform_br_fun inside procedure run
    transform_br_fun
    ( p_fun_id => r_fun_tree.id
    , p_msg_prefix => p_msg_prefix
    , p_msg_language => p_msg_language
    , p_create_att_usages => p_create_att_usages
    , p_overwrite_br => p_overwrite_br -- 6.5.2.3AMIS1.1

    Among the alternatives not mentioned... Using a TiVo DVR, rather than the X1; a Roamio Plus or Pro would solve both the concern over the quality of the DVR, as well as providing the MoCA bridge capability the poster so desperately wanted the X1 DVR to provide. (Although the TiVo's support only MoCA 1.1.) Just get a third-party MoCA adapter for the distant location. Why the hang-up on having a device provided by Comcast? This seems especially ironic given the opinions expressed regarding payments over time to Comcast. If a MoCA 2.0 bridge was the requirement, they don't exist outside providers. So couldn't the poster have simply requested a replacement XB3 from the local office and configured it down to only providing MoCA bridging -- and perhaps as a wireless access point? Comcast would bill him the monthly rate for the extra device, but such is the state of MoCA 2.0. Much of the OP sounds like frustration over devices providing capabilities the poster *thinks* they should have.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Siebel Sales Rep Visibility in BI Publisher, Bug???

    Hi, I have run into an issue with a bi publisher report in Siebel 8.1.1.0 and BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.0 where there is a Siebel View with a Visibliity Applet Type = Sales Rep. The data showing in the report on this view is not filtered according to "Sa

  • How can I allow a customer to enter an amount in a box and subtract it from a total

    I'm new to lifecycle so I need some help. I figured out how to create the form I wanted but there is one thing I am stuck on and I know someone knows how to do this. It's probably so easy but I am stuck. If you go to the form I created you will see t

  • LOOP PLAYING ON IPOD NANO

    I WANT TO PRODUCE A 'MUSAC'  PLAYLIST TO LAST APPROX 90 MINUTES BY LOOPING 30 MINUTES WORTH OF TRACKS. HAS ANYONE GOT A SUGGESTION FOR HOW THIS CAN BE CARRIED OUT?

  • Re-install Visual C++ problem

    Due to a disk problem (needed to replace disk) I tried to un-install VisualC but the uninstall failed. When I go to "Add/Remove Progs" it shows an entry for "Visual Studio.net Baseline-English" with a "?" in front of it and when I click on it it does

  • OSB Proxy calling another proxy - performance question

    My client wants to standardize their logging into a common proxy logging service (LoggingService). The idea is that all their services can call this service to perform standard logging. To implement this, we created a simple proxy based on any XML. I