Accounts hit during different MM transactions

Could anybody help in knowing the accounts hit during below transactions in MM.
With Std price method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
With MAP method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
Thanks
Muralidharan B

Hi,
For Domestic Procurement of Raw Material
            During GR
Material Stock             Dr.
GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
            During Excise Invoice Credit            
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
Vendor Payable                      Cr.
For Import Procurement of Raw Material
            During Customs Duty Clearing invoice
Custom Clearing         Dr.
Custom Payable                      Cr.
            During GR
Material Stock             Dr.
GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
            During Excise Invoice Credit            
Cenvat Account          Dr.      
Custom Clearing                     Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
Vendor Payable                      Cr.
For Excise Duty Credit of Raw Material without PO
Cenvat Account          Dr.      
Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
For Excise Duty Reversal through Excise JV
Cenvat Clearing          Dr.      
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
What should be my accounting entry when the goods are issued through MM and excise invoice is created (J1IS & J1IV)?
During Excise Invoice Creation
Cenvat Suspense Account      Dr.
Cenvat payable                                   Cr.
For TR6C Challan
PLA Account              Dr.
PLA on hold Account             Cr.
During Fortnightly  Utilization
Cenvat payable            Dr.
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
PLA Account                          Cr.
Note: Cenvat Suspense Account should be cleared appropriately using FI JV's.
What should be my accounting entry in subcontracting reversal / Recredit?
For Subcontracting Challan Reversal
Cenvat Reversal          Dr.
Cenvat Account                      Cr.
For Subcontracting Challan Recredit
Cenvat Account          Dr.
Cenvat Reversal                      Cr.
pherasath

Similar Messages

  • Acct  hit during Mat Doc posting is diff than the one in account det. in PO

    We have a material doc posted. But the account which is hit is different that the one determined in automatic account determination of the PO. I checked in Substitutions, But could not find any. Can there be any other reason?

    Hi All,
    In PO, the acct assignment category is maintained as F Order and the GL account is mentioned as 'XXXXXXX'
    But in OBYC 'YYYYYYYY' is maintained (for transaction DIFF). So how the system decides, which one to pick?
    IN my case YYYYYYYY is picked.
    Edited by: Rudra Prasanna Mohapatra on Dec 8, 2010 2:01 PM

  • Account hitting in Subcontracting process during GR and IR.

    Dear All,
    Could you please help me with the scenario of account hitting in Subcontracting process during GR and IR?
    There are three scenarios to be considered:
    1) Moving average price
    2) Standard price control without price difference.
    3) Standard price control with price difference.
    I would give full points if you can help me.
    Regards,
    Ranjan

    1) moving average
    When doing GR for finished product
    BSX- stock account finished -
    1000(+)
    BSV- change in stock -
    1000(-)
    FRL-external service----
    200(+)
    WRXGR/IR clearing acct--
    200(-)
    GBB_VBO- consumption acct raw material sent to vendor-----800(+)
    BSX- stock account--
    800(-)
    2) with Proce diff
    When doing GR for finished product
    BSX- stock account finished -
    1000(+)
    BSV- change in stock -
    1000(-)
    FRL-external service----
    200(+)
    PRD price diff
    WRXGR/IR clearing acct--
    200(-)
    GBB_VBO- consumption acct raw material sent to vendor-----800(+)
    BSX- stock account--
    800(-)
    3) no price diff
    When doing GR for finished product
    BSX- stock account finished -
    1000(+)
    BSV- change in stock -
    1000(-)
    FRL-external service----
    200(+)
    WRXGR/IR clearing acct--
    200(-)
    GBB_VBO- consumption acct raw material sent to vendor-----800(+)
    BSX- stock account--
    800(-)

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group

    Dear Experts,
    Iam raising this question after checking all the contents related to Sub Transaction type in SDN.
    My prob is: for raw material sales scenario i have created order delivery and invoice. For Invoice i have done account determination with a different G/L in VKOA. Now i have to create an excise invoice and the accounting entry for central ED on sales should go to different G/L account. for account determination i have done the following settings:
    Maintained Sub transaction type in
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Basic Settings
    ->Maintain Sub Transaction types
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India ->
    Account determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    Here against DLFC sub transaction Type is maintained..
    Also
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Account determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Here maintained Excise group with DLFC Company Code subtransaction type, chart of accounts and all required GL Account .
    But when the iam creating Excise Invoice in J1IIN and clicking on Subtransaction type-F4, no entries are shown. No values found is the message in green. Message no. DH801
    If i use subtransaction type and enter billing document and enter, the following error message comes:
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Iam unable to understand why the subtransaction type maintained is not showing in TCODE J1IIN?
    Regards

    For the error message DH801, please check note 840911
    Excise modvat accounts not defined for
           DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Please check  your G/L assignments "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction"
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group

    Hi Guys,
    Suddenly we are facing issue during exicse invoice capturing with MIGO
    system is giving following error
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group
    Message no. 8I402
    While in Excise account assignment table CAPE is Linked to Modvat Clearing Account which is further liked to correct GL
    Can any one explain the cause of this issue Points will be awarded
    Regards,
    Ashish

    Hi
    Pls maintain the following:
    1. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Pls note the Sub Tansaction type is IP for ETT CAPE.
    ETT  <b>Sub Trn Type</b>   DC Ind                Account Name
    CAPE     IP           CR Credit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    CAPE       IP                   DR Debit             RG23ECS RG 23 ECS account
    2. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check the G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type CAPE and maintain the same G/L accounts for ETT CAPE with <b>Sub Trn Type IP</b>.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

  • How To... Update Master Data during upload of transaction data

    Can anybody let me know how this can be achieved.
    I have datasource (Legacy not R3) where I am getting both master data and text for number of infoobjects.
    I dont want separate datasources.
    The datasource is actually transactional datasource.
    I dont need text in the cubes or DSO I need the text tables of the infoobjects to be updated.
    I could find this on SDN but do anyone have document based on the below link.I was not able to find it.
    How To... Update Master Data during upload of transaction data
    Thanks.

    Dear Praveen
    I guess yr req is demanding the knowledge of Data Unification and Synchronization whose scope is a bit outer the area of BW.( its MDM actually )
    In BW we could very well fetch data out of different data sources (even across the different system) with no issues so why not u trying that. if there is any issue implementing that then please specify what kind of trouble you are interfacing...
    I got the below link which may be helpful
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e7bd6389-0a01-0010-eb95-d45835d446a8

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for CEIV transaction and excise group`

    Dear All,
    During outgoing excise cancellation i am getting the massage
    `Excise modvat accounts not defined for CEIV transaction and excise group`
    I have checked the following,
    GL is assigned in excise account determination.
    the transection type CEIV is assigned to account  field cenvat sup.
    Please put some light on this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    deepti

    Dear Deepti
    Follow the IMG Path.
    Logistics-General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Account Determination --> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    Here you have to define respective G/L accounts for "Excise Transaction Type CEIV".   Check with your FI Guy if you have any clarification.
    Thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Changes in Purchasing Document Account Assignment during Goods Receipt

    Hi MM Gurus,
    Good day!
    I just wanted to check with you on something that I came up while tinkering with SAP. Say, I have a PO with account assignment F for Order 1. Then during GR, I realized that I placed the wrong account assignment object, which should be Order 2. Can I execute this change during GR or do I have to do it either at the PO or IV level? In the standard MIGO setup, the Account Assignment tab is set to display. I tried checking the details for F in OME9 and found the Account Assignment changeable field. I tried enabling it but I still came up with the same result. I understand the logic behind why is it setup that way, but I want to make sure if there is any workaround for this
    Hope you can respond the soonest.
    Regards,

    I our company (and many others I had contact to) the goods receipt is made by the porter or the warehouse people, in general from people different from the requestor. I mean the receipt is done at the central place where the goods arrive at the plant.
    the internal distribution is made based on the GR slip which has all necessary information.
    A warehouse guy, or even a porter (often from a external security service  provider) should not be able to correct any financially relevant information.
    A change of account assignment data may even be a conflict to existing approval strategies.
    LIV is done by accountants, a totally different skill level compared with warehouse workers.

  • GL accounts Hits- Sales order & Invoice ( for Service Material)

    Hi Gurus,
    While i create the sales order for a service material, which GL accounts hits in the system.
    and which GL accounts hits while creating an invoice for this order?
    Cheers,
    Sumith

    when you are creating an order nothing hits the GL account and when you create a bill it does. Now there are several entries in an Invoice which hits different GL account. Which specific do youwant to know. It will also differ from company to company how they manage their FI
    Regards

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO transaction and 13 excise group

    Dear All
    During execution of report in j2ier1 I am getting following error.
    For One plant it is giving following error
    Excise modvat accounts not defined for EWPO transaction and 13 excise group.
    And for other plant it is giving following error
    Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and 11 excise group.
    Please give the inputs on this issue.
    Thanks and regards
    deepti

    Dear Laxmipathi
    Thanks for your reply.I have checked as per your guidelines and found the following setting are already there.
    EWPO          Credit     CENVAT clearing account
    EWPO          Debit     RG 23 AED account
    EWPO          Debit     RG 23 AT1 Account
    EWPO          Debit     RG 23 BED account
    EWPO          Debit     RG 23 ECS Account
    EWPO          Debit     RG 23 SED account
    EWPO     RE     Credit     CENVAT clearing account
    EWPO     RE     Debit     RG 23 AED account
    EWPO     RE     Debit     RG 23 AT1 Account
    EWPO     RE     Debit     RG 23 BED account
    EWPO     RE     Debit     RG 23 ECS Account
    EWPO     RE     Debit     RG 23 SED account
    GRPO          Credit     CENVAT clearing account
    GRPO          Debit     CENVAT clearing account
    GRPO          Debit     CENVAT on hold account
    GRPO          Debit     RG 23 AED account
    GRPO          Debit     RG 23 AT1 Account
    GRPO          Debit     RG 23 BED account
    GRPO          Debit     RG 23 ECS Account
    GRPO          Debit     RG 23 SED account
    GRPO     IP     Credit     CENVAT clearing account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     CENVAT clearing account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     CENVAT on hold account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 AED account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 AT1 Account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 BED account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 ECS Account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 SED account
    I have checked the these  settings in the development and found that these are same.But on executing the same report in developement i am not geting the error for GRPO for the  plant for which error is showing in production.
    Please guide me.
    deepti

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction

    Dear All,
    Hi,
    I'm getting error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and 30 excise group" during receiving material. I have checked up in "excise account assignment table in IMG" , which I found to be ok . Does anyone came accross such an error , pl let me know what else I need to check.
    Best Regards,
    AK

    >
    ATUL KARAJGI wrote:
    > Dear All,
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm getting error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and 30 excise group" during receiving material. I have checked up in "excise account assignment table in IMG" , which I found to be ok . Does anyone came accross such an error , pl let me know what else I need to check.
    >
    > Best Regards,
    > AK
    Check the following configuration (in excise accounts table J_1IEXCACC)
    Excise transaction type: CAPE
    Excise group: 30
    Make sure the following fields are populated with the appropriate accounts.
    RG23CBED
    RG23CAED
    mod. clear
    RG23CECS
    RG23CAT1
    If this doesnt help, take help of an abaper to debug and find out which field the system is trying to read.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • File not found and exception during commit of transaction

    Hi All,<p></p>
    We are using weblogic 8.1 sp5 and oracle 9.2. In a business process (jpd), I am getting this message and exception immediately after publishing a request document(xml) to a channel and goes to the next process node and the process aborts. Any thoughts are appreciated. Please let me know soon.
    <p></p>
    Thanks in advance!<p></p>
    Prashant
    <p></P>
    <u>Message:</u>
    Could not find a file for class oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CXAConnection
    <p></P>
    If I hit continue while debugging then I get this <u>exception:</u><p></P>
    <Error> <EJB> <BEA-010026> <Exception occurred during commit of transaction Xid=BEA1-0049BFC11227BCBD651D(24359063),Status=Rolled back. [Reason=javax.ejb.EJBException: Exception on insert: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable],numRepliesOwedMe=0,numR
    epliesOwedOthers=0,seconds since begin=645,seconds left=60,XAServerResourceInfo[JMS_cgJMSStore]=(ServerResourceInfo[JMS_cgJMSStore]=(state=rolledback,assigned=qbAdmin),xar=JMS_cgJMSStore,re-Registered = false),XAServerResourceInfo[cgPool]=(ServerResourceInfo[cgPool]=(state=rolledback,assigned=qbAdmi
    n),xar=cgPool,re-Registered = false),SCInfo[qbDomain+qbAdmin]=(state=rolledback),SCInfo[current+qprocwlp1]=(state=rolledback),properties=({}),local properties=({modifiedListeners=[weblogic.ejb20.internal.TxManager$TxListener@397bfb], weblogic.jdbc.jta.cgPool=weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.TxInfo@4eb65b}),Own
    erTransactionManager=ServerTM[ServerCoordinatorDescriptor=(CoordinatorURL=qbAdmin+10.1.130.38:7003+qbDomain+t3+, XAResources={JMS_FileStore, JMS_QProcureFileStore, cgPool, JMS_cgJMSStore, bpmArchPool},NonXAResources={})],CoordinatorURL=qbAdmin+10.1.130.38:7003+qbDomain+t3+): javax.ejb.EJBException:
    Exception on insert: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable at com.bea.wlw.runtime.core.bean.BMPContainerBean.ejbStore(BMPContainerBean.java:1837) at com.bea.wli.bpm.runtime.ProcessContainerBean.ejbStore(ProcessContainerBean.java:193) at com.bea.wli.bpm.runtime.ProcessContainerBean.ejbStore(ProcessContainerBean.java:171) at com.bea.wlwgen.PersistentContainer_bajz39_Impl.ejbStore(PersistentContainer_bajz39_Impl.java:149)at weblogic.ejb20.manager.ExclusiveEntityManager.beforeCompletion(ExclusiveEntityManager.java:593) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.TxManager$TxListener.beforeCompletion(TxManager.java:737) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.callBeforeCompletions(ServerSCInfo.java:1026) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.startPrePrepareAndChain(ServerSCInfo.java:116) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrePrepareAndChain(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1202) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.globalPrePrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1974) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:257) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:228) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:430) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:333) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.onMessage(MDListener.java:298) at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.onMessage(JMSSession.java:2686) at weblogic.jms.client.JMSSession.execute(JMSSession.java:2598) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:224) at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:183)
    Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Exception on insert: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable
    at .bea.wlw.runtime.core.bean.BMPContainerBean.doInsert(BMPContainerBean.java:1909) at com.bea.wlw.runtime.core.bean.BMPContainerBean.ejbStore(BMPContainerBean.java:1817)... 18 more
    Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable at com.bea.wlw.runtime.core.container.Invocable.toByteArray(Invocable.java:812) at com.bea.wlw.runtime.core.bean.BMPContainerBean.doInsert(BMPContainerBean.java:1859)... 19 more
    Caused by: java.io.NotSerializableException: java.util.AbstractList$ListItr at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1054)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1332)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1304)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1247)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1052)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.defaultWriteFields(ObjectOutputStream.java:1332)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeSerialData(ObjectOutputStream.java:1304)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeOrdinaryObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:1247)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject0(ObjectOutputStream.java:1052)
    at java.io.ObjectOutputStream.writeObject(ObjectOutputStream.java:278)
    at com.bea.wlw.runtime.core.container.Invocable.toByteArray(Invocable.java:803)
    ... 20 more
    --------------- nested within: ------------------
    weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Unexpected exception in beforeCompletion: sync=weblogic.ejb20.internal.TxManager$TxListener@397bfb
    Exception on insert: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable - with nested exception:
    [javax.ejb.EJBException: Exception on insert: java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to serialize invocable] at weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1684) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:311) at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:228) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.execute(MDListener.java:430) at weblogic.ejb20.internal.MDListener.transactionalOnMessage(MDListener.java:333)

    One possible cause of this issue is that your JPD may have some non-transient field(s) which is/are not Serializable. Check for the warnings in the Workshop, that may point you to such fields.
    ~Balwinder

  • CO Accounts Assignments have different profit centers

    Hi,
    i am trying to post a retirement without customer using transaction ABAON. i am getting an error " CO Accounts Assignments have different Profit centres". i checked the asset master and saw that there are two CO Accounts Assignment. Cost Centre & Internat Order ( Statistical). in the masterdata of the cost centre and the internal order we have the same Profit centre.
    please help me as i am not good with CO.

    Hi,
    In a cost center you have a time interval.
    When the asset was created in the past there was a different proffit center assigned to the cost center (See TC KS03).
    You can do 2 things
    1, create a new time interval with the correct information
    2 .Do a intercompany transfer to a new asset (TC ABUMN).
    When 1 is not working you have to do 2
    I had the same problem with a BA and had to transfer it first
    An other option but I don't adviese that is to turn of the error message. This can create other problems

  • Error in FWZE -  CO Account Assignments have different profit centers

    Hi,
    Upon executing tcode FWZE, hit an error message "CO Account Assignments have different profit centers". Previously, in config the account assignment ref 50500 charged to profit centre 9000504. Then, I did create substitution rule, to ensure that flow has WBS ELement No.  (double entry DR Inventory Consumption - Project, Cr Clearing Payment Request). In this substitution, I hard code the WBS ELement No. And the profit centre will follow the profit center in Project System(9001201). Before i did the substitution, user need to do manual adjustment every month, because the inventory consumption is without WBS Element No.
    My question, is it possible to use the same account assignment refrence 50500 or I need to create a new account assignment ref, let say 50510? If I need to so, what is the relevant config I need to do.
    Thank you & Regards

    Hi,
    you can post to another account, then you would get no message.
    Also, you could switch-off the message or turn it into warning via OBA5. As you do an FI substitution and the error BK134 comes in CO, perhaps you could create forum posts in areas "ERP Financials" or "ERP Financials - Controlling".
    Tomislav

  • BK134 Error-Co Account assignments have different profit centers

    I have a PO created sone 6 months back. It has multiple items where we used account assignment category K and P in various line items.
    Now when I am trying to do any transactions like MIGO/MIRO/Change of qty in PO the system throws an error " Co account assignments have different profit centers"
    However onthe same PO I am able to create a new PO item with same GL/WBS combination without any errors.
    What would be the possible reason for this?
    Thanking you in advance.
    Dasaradh

    Thank you so much for your quick response.  We are getting ready to test this now.  One quick question.  There is a field in the OBA5 table for user.  What goes in this field, is it optional?  Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • PBG4 will not boot up- many attempted/failed solutions!

    I'll preface this with my computers background: It is a 4.5 year old PBG4 running OSX. I used it in school for various projects, photoshop, illustrator, etc. For the past year or so it has basically been used for photos, internet, and basic nothings.

  • How can i change my old master card account into my new master card account in app store?

    HOw can i change my old master card account into my new master card account?

  • BPC 7.5NW External Data Links

    Hi All u2013 This question is in regards to a BPC 7.5 NW (SP8) input schedule stored in BPC with externally linked MS Excel 2007 spreadsheets stored outside BPC. I have built an input schedule (which is stored in a team folder) and linked external ex

  • Void & re-issue cheque

    Hi, We have a situation to void cheque and re-issue another one. The condition is the payment document should not be touched. Because this Payment document is already cleared since it was a cross company code transaction. If we end up in voiding the

  • Transfer Pricing Utilizing Third Local Currency in Company Code?

    I was wondering whether utilizing the third local currency under the "Additional Local Currencies for Company Code" section of the IMG would not allow you to use Supply Chain going forward because that third local currency must be saved for Transfer