Actual activity cost should be planned for the next month

Hi,
I need the solution like this. Our fiscal year April to March. We want the actual activity prices of the April should be planned for the May month. And may month actual prices should be planned for the next month. Like that we want use our activity prices.
For this where we have to configure and what transaction codes we have to run in month end.
please guide me
Sateesh

Srikanth,
I know KP26 will be maintained for plan values.
This month actual should be planned for next month. and next month actuals should be planned for coming month.
Please guide me where i have to confiure this type of requirement.
Sateesh

Similar Messages

Hi,i just bought the Creative cloud membership and i would want to know why is t one year policy and you payed alot of money and still pay for the next month? Annual means yearly right ? why do i have to pay another next month.

Hi i just want to know i bought the creative cloud and photoshop and premiere. All those and it said annual meaning i have to pay for the next year right? But why did it said that i have to pay for the next month? What happens when i didn't pay the next month ?

You may buy an annual subscription and pay monthly, or a straight monthly subscription... and, being a subscription, if you stop paying the software stops working
If you want a one time payment, and you can use 3+ year old software, go to Creative Suite 6

I want to get the free trial however do I have to pay for the next month?

Please answer ASAP

Hi there, Chyakka, and welcome to the Skype Community!
Click to enlarge Thanks to my browser and the reply button, your full question was
"I want to get the free trial. However, do I have to pay for the next month?"
I'm pleased to inform you that the answer is no. You are under absolutely NO obligation to continue your subscription if you don't unconditionally want to. (Really, though, why would you cancel your subscription with the lowest rates in online telephony?)
After 27 days, your subscription automatically renews. Cancel within the 27 days and you won't be charged for the full amount of the subscription on a month-to-month basis. For your reference: A month-to-month Unlimited World subscription is US$13.99 and can get as low as US$11.89/mo. when you prepay for one year (a 15% off discount.) Prices mentioned are pre-tax amounts where applicable. To learn how to cancel your subscription, which takes no more than a few minutes of your time, check out this support article. (You have my promise that this isn't rocket science!) Thanks for trying out one of Skype's most valuable subscriptions and I hope you enjoy Skype as a whole! If you have any more questions or concerns about Skype, don't hesitate to post again to the community!

Should I wait for the next generation of intel before I purchase my Mac

I use FCP Studio at work. I also use Studio 8 (Macromedia), but on a PC. I wan't to purchase a Mac sometime in the next year and run FCPS and S8 on it. (Any way they would both run on a laptop?) All of this talk of Universal crossgrades, etc. has me confused. Should I wait for the software to catch up with the hardware? Should I wait for the G5 intels? I'm in no hurry and want to make the right investment. I teach, so we have several different models of Mac - laptops, G4s, and G5s. I need to understand all of this crossgrade stuff before I purchase my own or the school purchase anymore computers.
I would really appreciate advice from the experts.
PowerMac G5, (7,3) Mac OS X (10.4)

just to address some of your points:
All of this talk of Universal crossgrades, etc. has me confused. Should I wait for the software to catch up with the hardware?
since Apple first introduced the move to Intel there have been some clever blighters installing OS X on their PC's and Windows on their Intel Mac's ... not to mention that it is now never been easier for PC developers to port their software to the Mac platform
so who knows, there may be a possibility of dual booting your Mac to run both FCP in OSX and Studio 8 in Windows, or if the developers port it, running Studio 8 natively on the Mac ... but not yet.
there's also speculation about software virtualization, whereby you might run your app regardless of the host OSX ... but again, not yet.
in the meantime the G5 Quads are spectacular machines in their own right ... wish I had one.
Should I wait for the G5 intels?
the laptop MacIntels are getting rave reviews, its safe to assume that the MacIntel desktops/towers will be even more impressive, however the publically announced timeframe for their release is not before the end of the year ... although we're all hopeful that they'll come sooner
if your current systems meet your needs, if you have no special reason for upgrading, like you are losing work because your facilites are not up to spec (or you just can't wait and have money burning a hole in your pocket) then it would be prudent to wait and see.
let the bleeding edge pioneers forge the way Jackie, wait for the dust to settle ... the second generation are usually much improved over the first

How to calculate the measure for the next month using the AGO Function

Hi,
I need to calculate the measure for the current month and the next month.
Can anyone please let me know the syntax to use AGO function for the above requirement.
Regards,
Ambika Nanda.

Hi.
You can also use Oracle analytic functions LAG and LEAD inside the EVALUATE obiee function. The second one will give you the next measure.
For example the report is:
TIMES.CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC
SALES.AMOUNT_SOLD
LAG column: EVALUATE('LAG(%1, 1) OVER (ORDER BY %2)' AS DOUBLE, SALES.AMOUNT_SOLD, TIMES.CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC)
LEAD column: EVALUATE('LEAD(%1, 1) OVER (ORDER BY %2)' AS DOUBLE, SALES.AMOUNT_SOLD, TIMES.CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC)
And the result is:
CALENDAR_MONTH_DESC--------AMOUNT_SOLD--------LAG--------------LEAD
2000-01----------------------------------8025513.84---------------------------8474475.88
2000-02----------------------------------8474475.88----- 8025513.84-----7439568.24
2000-03----------------------------------7439568.24------8474475.88-----7062040.48
2000-04----------------------------------7062040.48------7439568.24-----7497971.40
Regards
Goran
http://108obiee.blogspot.com

Don't die after your billing cycle ends cause they will still charge for the following month

My husband passed away on Thanksgiving day but becaude my billing cycle ended on the 20th, Verizon is charging me $30 for the next month even tho I cancelled his phone. thanks for the compassion

I'm very sorry for your loss.
Yes, that's the way it works.
Best wishes to you.

Apple should do something for the equipment stolen something like block and only activated by key words given to register the device on the apple's website

Apple should do something for the equipment stolen something like block it(them) and only activated by key words given to register the device on the apple's website

Tell Apple:
http://www.apple.com/feedback
Doubtful that this would happen. Privacy laws would likely be tested with this.
No manufacturer does this.

Multiple Executions Plans for the same SQL statement

Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.
Below is the awrsqrpt's output for your reference.
WORKLOAD REPOSITORY SQL Report
Snapshot Period Summary
DB Name         DB Id    Instance     Inst Num Release     RAC Host
TESTDB          2157605839 TESTDB1               1 10.2.0.3.0 YES testhost1
              Snap Id      Snap Time      Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap:     32541 11-Oct-08 21:00:13       248     141.1
End Snap:     32542 11-Oct-08 21:15:06       245     143.4
   Elapsed:               14.88 (mins)
   DB Time:               12.18 (mins)
SQL Summary                            DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
                Elapsed
   SQL Id      Time (ms)
51szt7b736bmg     25,131
Module: SQL*Plus
UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL,
0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND TEST_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE
TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )
SQL ID: 51szt7b736bmg                  DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> 1st Capture and Last Capture Snap IDs
   refer to Snapshot IDs witin the snapshot range
-> UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(AC...
    Plan Hash           Total Elapsed                 1st Capture   Last Capture
#   Value                    Time(ms)    Executions       Snap ID        Snap ID
1   2960830398                 25,131             1         32542          32542
2   3834848140                      0             0         32542          32542
Plan 1(PHV: 2960830398)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                            25,131       25,130.7     3.4
CPU Time (ms)                                23,270       23,270.2     3.9
Executions                                        1            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                               2,626,166    2,626,166.0    14.6
Disk Reads                                      305          305.0     0.3
Parse Calls                                       1            1.0     0.0
Rows                                        371,735      371,735.0     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                         564            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name            | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |                 |       |       | 1110 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST            |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL          | TEST            |   116K| 2740K| 1110   (2)| 00:00:14 |
|   3 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT            |     1 |    26 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACCT_DT_ACC_IDX |     1 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Plan 2(PHV: 3834848140)
Plan Statistics                        DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name                                Statement   Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms)                                 0            N/A     0.0
CPU Time (ms)                                     0            N/A     0.0
Executions                                        0            N/A     N/A
Buffer Gets                                       0            N/A     0.0
Disk Reads                                        0            N/A     0.0
Parse Calls                                       0            N/A     0.0
Rows                                              0            N/A     N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms)                           0            N/A     N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms)                            0            N/A     N/A
Application Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms)                        0            N/A     N/A
Invalidations                                     0            N/A     N/A
Version Count                                     2            N/A     N/A
Sharable Mem(KB)                                 26            N/A     N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation                    | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |              |       |       |     2 (100)|          |
|   1 | UPDATE                      | TEST         |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST         |     1 |    28 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | TEST_DT_IND |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT         |     1 |    26 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | INDX_ACCT_DT |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Full SQL Text
SQL ID       SQL Text
51szt7b736bm UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL, 0) +
              NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL, 0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND PB
             RN_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )Your input is highly appreciated.
Thanks for taking your time in answering my question.
Regards

Oracle Lover3 wrote:
Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.If you're using bind variables and you've histograms on your columns which can be created by default in 10g due to the "SIZE AUTO" default "method_opt" parameter of DBMS_STATS.GATHER__STATS it is quite normal that you get different execution plans for the same SQL statement. Depending on the values passed when the statement is hard parsed (this feature is called "bind variable peeking" and enabled by default since 9i) an execution plan is determined and re-used for all further executions of the same "shared" SQL statement.
If now your statement ages out of the shared pool or is invalidated due to some DDL or statistics gathering activity it will be re-parsed and again the values passed in that particular moment will determine the execution plan. If you have skewed data distribution and a histogram in place that reflects that skewness you might get different execution plans depending on the actual values used.
Since this "flip-flop" behaviour can sometimes be counter-productive if you're unlucky and the values used to hard parse the statement leading to a plan that is unsuitable for the majority of values used afterwards, 11g introduced the "adaptive" cursor sharing that attempts to detect such a situation and can automatically re-evaluate the execution plan of the statement.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH

Dear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Order settlement cost ( Activity cost) can we consider for financial report

I am in port Implemetation as per their senario financial reports based on cost center hierarchy,
for minisrial report requirement, they submitting Operational wise nothing but cost center heirarchy wise
for Pm order settlement Man hour cost based on kp26 computed cost converted actual at the time of confirmation. At the time of settlement to concern cost center is debited but primary cost booking for (man hour) salaries not deducting the primary cost element. Here is salaries and manhours both is apprearing in the cost center. My client requirement is based manour activity cost deducted in salary primary element, they want that process. After Order settlement based on amount we can deduct concern intial cost booking cost center to Order settle cost center.
Please suggest and PM order cost affect in cost center in primary booking and after order settlement
Please anyone resolve my issue
Clarification above issue
when we settle PM order Activtiy cost (Manhours) based on the salaried booked in primary cost element,we assume per hour man hour cost and specify in kp26 based on the activtiy cost planning system picks cost and at time of order settlement it will settle concern cost center.
intially we booked salaries in primary cost not thing but salaries a/c and once again we are settling the same salary assumption cost to cost center ...
when we go for cost center report Initial salary a/c booking Administrative cost center and now production cost center with activity cost with secondary cost element ....so problem is both cost centers are debiting for the same salaries( activity cost) but my client want cost center report all including primary and secondary cost element total balance.
Please resolve my problem it very critical
Edited by: msreddy08 on Sep 10, 2009 6:27 AM
Edited by: msreddy08 on Sep 10, 2009 6:39 AM

Dear Sudhakar,
salaries cost booked in administrative cost center with primary cost element salary a/c
but Activity type man hour is meant for per hour salary cost. we can specified in kp26
so when we take cost center report, we get salary amount and activity cost in admin cost center and product cost center for the same salary amount... for financial report requirment, if we use cost center report the salay amount appeared twice.
Please explain the activity cost against salay amount ..

CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments

Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE     10.2.0.4.0     Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1     COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     3607425     167760     5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3658     80     5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     32310     496     5/01/2013 0:07
NMI     1899024     33557     18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER     4830153     101504     18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1607456     19137     18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     5110781     78691     18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1425890     42468     18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     NUM_ROWS     BLOCKS     LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET     4133939     198570     16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     3779     80     16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     33720     510     16/02/2013 10:55
NMI     1969000     33113     16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER     5837874     120104     16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     1788152     22325     16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     6101934     91088     16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     1447589     43804     16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2     COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     9878     67     147     12982     869801     3553095
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7291     2747     2     639     1755977     3597916
ASSET     SYS_C00102592     UNIQUE     2     12488     3733831     1     1     3726639     3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C0092052     UNIQUE     1     12     3670     1     1     3590     3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C0092074     UNIQUE     1     104     32310     1     1     32132     32310
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6298     844853     1     2     1964769     1965029
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6701     1923072     1     1     1922831     1923084
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     106     4     26     52     211     211
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     12498     795     15     2899     2304831     4711808
REGISTER     SYS_C00102653     UNIQUE     2     16942     5065660     1     1     5056855     5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3667     1607968     1     1     1607689     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3811     668727     1     2     1606204     1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C00102665     UNIQUE     2     5116     1529606     1     1     1528136     1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C00102677     UNIQUE     2     17370     5193638     1     1     5193623     5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4406     676523     1     2     1423247     1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     7374     676523     1     2     1458238     1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00102687     UNIQUE     2     4737     1416207     1     1     1415022     1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME     INDEX_NAME     UNIQUENESS     BLEVEL     LEAF_BLOCKS     DISTINCT_KEYS     AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY     CLUSTERING_FACTOR     NUM_ROWS
ASSET     IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8606     121     71     16428     1987833     4162257
ASSET     IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     8432     1780146     1     1     2048170     4162257
ASSET     SYS_C00116157     UNIQUE     2     13597     4162263     1     1     4158759     4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER     SYS_C00116570     UNIQUE     1     12     3779     1     1     3734     3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM     SYS_C00116592     UNIQUE     1     107     33720     1     1     33459     33720
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID     NONUNIQUE     2     6319     683370     1     2     1970460     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_ID_NK     NONUNIQUE     2     6597     1971293     1     1     1970771     1971313
NMI     IDX_NMI_STATS     NONUNIQUE     1     98     48     2     4     196     196
REGISTER     REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM     NONUNIQUE     2     15615     1273     12     2109     2685924     5886582
REGISTER     SYS_C00116748     UNIQUE     2     19533     5886582     1     1     5845565     5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4111     1795084     1     1     1758441     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     IDX_SLA_SDP_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     4003     674249     1     2     1787987     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET     SYS_C004520     UNIQUE     2     5864     1795130     1     1     1782147     1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER     SYS_C004539     UNIQUE     2     20413     6152850     1     1     6073059     6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     3227     660649     1     2     1422572     1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK     NONUNIQUE     2     6399     646257     1     2     1346948     1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT     SYS_C00128706     UNIQUE     2     4643     1447946     1     1     1442796     1447946
TEST ITEM 3     COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation                       | Name                   | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                    |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN                     |                        |    13 | 2067 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                    |                        |     6 |   900 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN ANTI              |                        |     1 |   137 |       |   135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI                    |     1 |    22 |       |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |   131 |       | 95137   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 |        HASH JOIN                |                        |     1 |   109 |       | 95132   (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL       | ASSET                  | 36074 | 1021K|       | 38553   (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 |         HASH JOIN               |                        | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578   (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 |          HASH JOIN              |                        | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654   (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 |           HASH JOIN             |                        | 39674 | 1782K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | REGISTER               | 39439 | 1232K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL    | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL     | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   675K|    12M|       | 9412   (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL      | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      | 1178K|    15M|       | 4262   (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN         | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 |      VIEW                       |                        | 39674 |   232K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 |       HASH JOIN                 |                        | 39674 | 1046K|       | 40101   (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | REGISTER               | 39439 |   500K|       | 22584   (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL        | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 4206K|    56M|       | 17490   (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL           | METER_CONFIG_HEADER    | 3658 | 47554 |       |    19   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL            | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      | 7590 | 68310 |       |   112   (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
   3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
   4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
   7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
   8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation                            | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                         |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 |   HASH JOIN ANTI                     |                        |     1 |   181 |   103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN                         |                        |     1 |   176 | 56855   (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        |     1 |   163 | 36577   (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     | ASSET                  |     1 |    44 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                   |                        |     1 |   131 | 9834   (2)| 00:01:59 |
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS                  |                        |     1 |    87 | 9830   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS                 |                        |     1 |    74 | 9825   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 |          HASH JOIN                   |                        |     1 |    52 | 9820   (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 |           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER    |     1 |    14 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 |            NESTED LOOPS              |                        |     1 |    33 |   116   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL        | METER_CONFIG_ITEM      |     1 |    19 |   115   (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 |             INDEX RANGE SCAN         | SYS_C00116570          |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT |   723K|    13M| 9699   (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 |          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI                    |     1 |    22 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IDX_NMI_ID_NK          |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 |         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET      |     1 |    13 |     5   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 |          INDEX RANGE SCAN            | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK         |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK |     2 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 | 2378K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 |    VIEW                              |                        | 90889 |   443K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 |     HASH JOIN                        |                        | 90889 | 2307K| 47021   (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | REGISTER               | 76113 |   966K| 26743   (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER   | 5095K|    63M| 20245   (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
   3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
              "SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
   4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
   5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
   9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
              SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PM

Hi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME     PNAME     PVAL1     PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO     STATUS     NULL     COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTART     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     DSTOP     NULL     02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO     FLAGS     1     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEEDNW     1321.20523     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOSEEKTIM     10     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     IOTFRSPEED     4096     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MREADTIM     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     CPUSPEED     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MBRC     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     MAXTHR     NULL     NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN     SLAVETHR     NULL     NULL

Should You Buy An iPhone Now, Or Wait For The Next One?

Great article by HuffPost Tech.
The most common thing I get asked whenever I tell anyone I'm a tech writer is some version of the question: "Should I get a new iPhone now, or should I wait until the next one comes out?" It is as though my business card should read not "Technology Writer," and instead "iPhone Psychic"
Not that I am not happy to prognosticate! And in that spirit, here's a look at the questions on everyone's mind: Should I buy an iPhone now? And if not now, when?
First, let me say that I am fascinated by the peculiar kind of panic that I encounter in people I meet who are deciding on a purchase date for their next Apple phone. I call it the iSenberg Uncertainty Principle: Potential iPhone buyers exist in a constant state of anxiety, perpetually worrying that purchasing an iPhone on any given day will mean that they will miss out on the inevitably cooler version with the mind-blowing new features soon down the road. The Cupertino Sword of Damocles constantly dangles over their heads, threatening to pierce them with unhipness and iShame.
Here is one solid piece of advice I can offer to help you avoid the Sword: Do not buy any new iPhone until September. Apple has an annual media conference each September, and every blog with the word 'Mac' in the title is reporting that Steve Jobs is going to do his black turtleneck thing and introduce some kind of new iPhone there. The September Media conference is generally used to present the new iPods, but as All Things Digital reports, Apple plans to "commandeer" the conference for its official iPhone announcement.
Apple is long overdue to release its new iPhone anyway, if history is any indication. Look at this handy little timeline:
June 2007: original iPhone released
June 2008: iPhone 3G released
June 2009: iPhone 3Gs released
June 2010: iPhone 4 released
June 2011: Nothing!
In other words, the 5th generation iPhone is already a month late, so it makes sense that the rumors are swirling. Apple's tardiness can be explained by the fact they've actually already released two iPhones in 2011 -- the Verizon iPhone in February and the unlocked iPhone 4 in June. Their schedule is all screwy, like a traveler trying to get over jet lag. But all signs point to them getting right with a September Apple iPhone release.
So what jaw-dropping new feature will this iPhone boast? We're hearing that the "iPhone 4S," as it is rumored to be called, won't be the dramatic re-imagining that many of us have come to expect with each new iPhone release. Tech blogThis Is My Next thinks that it will be thinner and lighter, and that it will run on a new chip; the New York Times thinks that it will be the same dimensions as the iPhone 4 but that it will be cheaper. Bloomberg agrees with This Is My Next on the chip and adds that the rear-facing camera will upgrade to 8 megapixels from 5 megapixels.
Now, even if you're just a normal, non-geek iPhone user, who doesn't care if the rear-facing camera doubles its megapixel count, or if Apple has changed the manufacturer of its data processors, or whatever, you still need to at least wait for the alleged iPhone announcement, and here's why: if history is any indicator, the introduction of a newer iPhone model is accompanied by a drop in price of older iPhone models. When the iPhone 3GS was announced, the price of the iPhone 3G dropped by $100; when the iPhone 4 was announced, the price of an iPhone 3GS also dropped by $100. Even if you know that you're not going to drop $400 on whatever iPhone Apple begins peddling in September, there is no sense in paying more money for an iPhone 4 or 3Gs now when the base price of both seem like locks to drop in two months.
But before we start fantasizing, how can we be so certain that Jobs is even going to announce an iPhone in September if Apple hasn't so much as indicated such a thing? How do we know that all of these rumors weren't just started by lonely nerds like me and my co-workers emailing each other from our mother's basements, inciting iPhone rumors all on our own?
Well, first of all, I don't live with my mother; and second of all, the new iPhone rumors have sprung forth from two reliable sources held in high journalistic regard.
The first is esteemed, award-winning tech journalist John Paczkowski of All Things Digital, who blazed iPhone prognostication trails by predicting back in April that an updated iPhone 4 would be unveiled at the September Apple music Conference and has steadfastly maintained the claim is true through June and into July. In fact, he confirmed as recently as July 5 that a shiny new iPhone looked to be in the early stages of supply chain production, and that people close to the company still believe that the new iPhone would be ready for the Jobs treatment in September.
So there is Reliable Source One.
Reliable Source Number Two is the Wall Street Journal, not exactly a one-laptop operation. The paper gives "the end of September" as a target launch date, which squares up with both Paczkowski's prediction of a September announcement and release. This doesn't even mention This Is My Next's separate prediction of a September release, nor 9to5Mac reporting that there are going to be two new iPhones in September, one low-end and high-end. But now we're falling down the rabbit hole and into the basement again, so let's focus:
There is likely to be a new iPhone in September. It will likely affect the price of all the other iPhones. The iPhones available now -- the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3Gs -- will probably be cheaper in two months. Unless you drop your current iPhone in a pool, a bathtub or a volcano, do not buy an iPhone until Steve Jobs opens his beautiful brilliant mouth at the Apple conference in early September. When the post-turtleneckian dust settles, we'll have a clearer picture of whether or not this rumored new iPhone is worth the money. And then we can talk about--well, whether or not you should buy an iPhone now, or wait until the next one comes out.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/12/iphone-release-5-september_n_896345.html

Apple has two prototypes out testing now. One is a thinner totally redesigned case. The problem with it is that Foxconn can't seem to build it. Hence the delay. The other prototype uses the existing case, but with updated (read dual core) internals. If they can get production up by September the first phone will be released and will be the iPhone 5. If they cannot, then the second prototype will be released as the iPhone 4GS.

Actual Activity Cost

Hi Friends
For calculating the actual rate system take all the actual activity cost and divide it with actual quantity. I want to know how the system is calculating actual activity cost.
In KSII system will calculate the actual activity rate. What is the backgroung calculation. Or how to find out the actual activity cost per period is XXXX.
Regards
Jos
Edited by: Joji Jose V on Nov 15, 2010 3:58 PM

Hi Jose
1. Actual Activity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center and act type in FI postings / Depreciation postings
however, this is quite rare... To use this, Act Type must be switched in OKKP in Control Indicators
2. In absence of (1), Actual Actvity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center
3. If there are more than one act type in a cost center, then KSS2 would split the costs between the act types based on your Splitting rule in OKES... And then these costs would be divided by Actual Act Qty to calculate the Activity price
Regards
Ajay M

2.0 or should I spring for the extra .16? Please help

Hi all,
am currently using a G5 2.3 DP tower and am thinking of jumping to a MBP. My questions is will the 2.0 be enough of should I spring for the 2.16 and will I see/feel the difference.
Does anyone have an idea also on how much of a difference there will be in speed between my G5 and the MBPs?
I intend to max out the ram at 2Gb and keep the standard 5400 rpm drives for now.
Will use it for MS office, Java, iLife and web based design.
Thank you all for any advice and input.
chris

Hi All and thanks to all who replied. It is greatly appreciated and has been very helpful.
Here is the update.
I initially ordered a 2.0BTO with a 7200rpm drive. First one arrived and was DOA - it had a really loud shreeking (not a whine but a loud shreeking) sound when turned on and and was very unstable with random KPs. Called Applecare and ran a HW test that detected a MoBo error so back it went.
Second unit arrived and after a couple of days was also declared DOA as it would not charge consistantly and screen flickered.
Ended up cancelling the BTO order and went to my local reseller who had a 2.0 5400rpm Hd in stock. Told him the issues I had so he suggested we open one up and test it to make sure it was ok and I was happy with it before I paid for it. I agreed and eventually left with my new 2.0 100Mb 5400rpm 2gig ram MBP.
It's been a week since I brought it home and all is well. A couple of observations I have made after 3 MPBs are:
1. I actually feel that the units did have different heat levels when running. This is very unscientific as one had a faulty MoBo and one had charging issues but the one I have now is warm, but has never reached the level of being uncomfortable even when running it flat out.
2. 3 different MBPs with 3 different quality of builds. The first one was flawless, perfect and fit. Second one had a slightly misaliged screen that lifted at one corner. Third one is pretty good but the first one was the best.
3. The Whine - I don't want to comment on this as there has been enough said and written bout this but I do want to say that in my opinion, if you listen hard enough to anything that is mechinical, high performance with active moving parts and high speed processors you will hear some sounds. As long as it is not obtrusive, counter-productive or distracting or drawing attention to itself, I am ok with it.
4. I think the week of build does not assure you of the quality of MBP. It is a hit and miss thing if you end up with one that is less than fully functional. The first BTO was a wk 13 the second was a wk 15 and the one I am happy with is a wk 14. A friend has a 1.83 wk 10 machine that is perfect as well while one of her friends has a wk 11 and has not had any issues. Funny thing is the shop owner I bough it from said there have been people coming in and asking what week the MBP was and not staying when they found out it wasn't the latest production week.
Anyway, I hope this has been useful info and again, a big thank you to all who replied and gave their input and suggestions. Greatly Appreciated
Cheers

Actual activity cost should be planned for the next month

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for