Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''
hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGH
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
Edited by: amol wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM
Dear,
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
Please give the feed back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Similar Messages
-
Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .
hi ,
During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
pls help me to solve this problem.
AMOL WAGHDear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Activity type E not allowed for equipment entered
Dear Sir , We are using ETM . Following error is coming while creating performace based document .
Activity type E not allowed for equipment entered
Regards
AnilGive 1 for both type and give it a try.
for target=actual which is type 5 pls check the link below
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/66/bc6faa43c211d182b30000e829fbfe/content.htm -
"Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application".
SAP Experts,
Whenever, I delete a delivery, I am seeing a pop-up message with the information message as "Prodcut allocation check not allowed for ATPcat.'BR' and application". Is this a standard functionality. We dont have ATP Check/Allocation check during delivery delete. How come we get this message ?
This is something curious. Can someone help me on this please ??
Thanks,
Babu KilariDelete the ATP category BR from check control for A (Sales document). It seems when you are deleting a delivery the transfer of requirements settings pop this
Let me know if you are successful
Regards,
Loknath -
With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati
Dear all
with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
how it is possible.
Regrads
SrinivasDear ,
In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
We can change it as per req using user exit
Regards,
Ishwar -
Invoice is not allowed for order 00065
Hi experts,
This error is relating to the Accounts payables(SAP). The error occurred and the invoice has fallen out from ERP (SAP) while posting the invoice. The error is "no invoice is allowed for order 00065".
some Inputs: if you go to ME23N screen line item details invoice tab you can find the check boxes like Incoming Invoice, cost centre and Order. Usually for a particular PO incoming invoice and cost centre check boxes will be checked but in this case Order check box is checked and the invoice has fallen out from ERP.
Could any body please let me know how to resolve this issue in SAP. I'm not FI/CO consultant but SAP BW if I know i can guide team.
Thanks in advance,
amarnathDear,
What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
Please check the above in the system
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Actual activity price does not exist for cost center / activity type
Hi,
We are trying to upload the time sheet related data(number of hours an employee workred on a project) ect from Non SAP to SAP.
We have used a customized program and have loaded the data from se38.
All this HR data will be saved in CAT2
Later we transfer the time related data into SAP FI/CO using CAT7.
+When tested with a couple of employees time sheets, they got uploaded in SE38 proerly and when transfered it through CAT7 it was properly taking the hour*rate is cost and was reflecting in the respective cost element.
For a few time sheets in SE38 we were getting an error saying that the cost center(100501)/ activity type(EAT001) does not exist for 2010.
Hence we have taken, FY 2010, the cost centes and activity types in KP26 and have given the planned Activity as 1. No planned cost in KP06.
We have run the price calculation forr the FY 2010.
Then we were able to uplaod the time sheets, but when we tried to transfer the data through CAT7, it throws an error saying no activity price exist for cost center 100501/ activity type EAT001. If I ignore the warning an proceed, no amount is being calculated.
When uploaded employee time sheets before, all the cost were getting claculated and were entering into the respective cost elements, but now no amounts are being calculated and it is taking Zero.
When checked the previous years data i.e, 2009 all amounts are fine, in KSII I can see the activity quantity filled with some numbers in 2009, where from are they comming? I have checked KBk6 nothing was mentioned.
PLease assit
Regards,
shilpaHi
I never used CAT* though, but the error means that you need to maintain a activity price in KBK6 (Actual price)
Regards
Ajay M -
KKAX - error 'Manual WIP/results analysis is not allowed for order
We are running KKAX on some process orders. A few of them get the error 'there are values for cost element 999999 that are not assigned to any line ID'; however, we do have a line id set up for the cost element, etc; when we drill down further on the message, what we end up with is 'manual wip/results analysis is not allowed'. The business transaction for this is KABM. I can see on the order that KABM is not a permitted business transaction.
We only have this problem on a few of the orders. How is the KABM being invoked? Is it caused by an order status? How can I fix this?
Thank youHi Christian
i have come up with the new business requirement
I want to change some of the material in one of the plant into discreete.For that, I tried to delete the production version and then tried to uncheck repetitive manufacturing indictor in MRP4 view.
But it is giving the following error
Either you are attempting to delete production version 1000 or
you haveattempted to deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the production version.
It is not possible to delete the production version or to
deselect the repetitive manufacturing indicator for the following reasons:
o Cutoff period for WIP calculation has not yet been
established. For the period in which a goods receipt was last entered with reference to this production version.
o The cutoff period for variance calculation has not been
defined for the full life of the production version.
Can you please help me out how to resolve this issue -
Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing one problem in Actual activity allocation
In production cost center, cost centers are credited with plan price (Re.1) for every activity qty confirmation
the system posted from Jan to May plan price
in the month of June system posted price Rs.2.02 for five transaction for the rest of the transaction it is taking Re.1. I don't from where this has been picked/calculated by the system
Please help in finding this
regards
VSN
Edited by: priyas78 on Sep 5, 2011 2:23HI,
- What is displayed in KSBT - plan must be the same of kp26; executing the report select only period 6, otherwise the system show average values.
- May be I did not understand correctly your question; for clarification, what do you mean with "Re" and "Rs"? are them two different activity type?
Paolo -
Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing
Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1 E LAB10 994310 2.00 2.00 AED 1.0 HR Labour Cost New
2 E DIE20 994320 5.00 5.00 AED 1.0 HR Diesel Cost New
3 E ELE30 994330 1.00 1.00 AED 1.0 HR Electricity Cost
4 M 1100000042 5.00 0.00 AED 1 PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5 G 994201 0.00 0.00 AED Depriciation Cost
6 G 994202 0.00 0.00 AED Sales & Distribution Cost
13.00 AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67
2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
Labour Cost New 2.00
Diesel Cost New 5.00
Electricity Cost 1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 00.00
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 4.00
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 5.00
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 2.00
16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area 1000 Controlling Area
Cycle ZELE01 Status Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle 994215 Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per 100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB01 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE02 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE03 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE20 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE30 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB10 183.35
1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy Object Name AUn Act Qty Total price Price (Fixed) PUnit
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 Production Dxb HR 5.0 366.66 366.66 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.65 916.65 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.75 916.75 10
2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00- 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33 183.35
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33 183.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67 183.33
2.67- 542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar ChinchkarDear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
QTY 3.1 Tot Price 3,709.68 Planned(FIX) 3,709.68 Per Units 10
(System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 - 558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total - 965.57
4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
PL Act Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar -
QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables
Hi,
I have a master data object load request which has failed, returned error in st22 and job finished.
BUT the request has not turned red in the monitor - it's still yellow. That means that I can not delete request nor start new load to infoprovider because it believes a request is still running. But it's not, I've checked both sm37, sm50 etc.
When trying to manually change QM status to 'red' it says 'QM action not allowed for DTP requests in master data and Text tables'
How can I force QM status to red so that I can move on?
Running NW2004s BI (7.0) Patch 15.
I searched for this question but there is no answer
Thank youFolks
I know how frustrating this problem is even in netweaver 7.0 environment. I found a solution for this problem atlast and it works but a not direct way of resolving this issue.
When this request is in yellow status and not able to change / delete the request, its actually in a pseudo status and it is a bug in the program. This request sits in table RSBKREQUEST with processing type as 5 in data elements USTATE, TSTATE and this 5 is actually "Active" status which is obviously wrong.
All we need is, ask your basis person to change the status to 3 in both these data elements and then it allows to reload the delta. Once the delta is successfully loaded, you can delete the previous bad request even though it is still in yellow. Once the request is deleted, the request status gets updated as "4" in table RSBKREQUEST.
Hope this helps.
Thanks -
Negative quantity not allowed for Put Away Planned
Dear Experts,
I'm trying to activate the PDI document but the system show the error message: Negative quantity not allowed for Put Away Planned.
I was looking the document flow from the item 10 and I saw there is one task was created with quantity "1 box" and the same document was cancelled but the quantity "2 box" was cancelled. I believe because of this is happening the error.
All items from my HU is with the same problem, duplicate the quantity during canceling.
Somebody can give me advice how fix it.
I found a SAPNote but Note 1674037:Negative Put Away Planned quantity (PWP) due to "Store HUs" but I need a workaround to fix my actual PDI and finish the process.
Regards,
Alan MattosHi Petr,
I checked the transaction SMQ2 and I dont have anything stuck there. Then I tried to change de deliveryquantity but the field quantity isn't available to change. My PDI document already been the Goods Receipt Status "Completed". I try to reverse this document and the system show the message: Delivery is locked (Posting Not Possible). I believe its happening because the PDI isn't active.
Do you have other idea ???
Thank you a lot for your help. -
Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services
Hi,
I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards
AnirbanHi Georg,
We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
Best Regards,
Anirban -
Method SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE not allowed for type F
Hi Gurus
I have created a webdynpro abap application in which these steps
1. Application triggers the workflow and workitem got created through FM1.
2. Workitem loads up webdynpro abap application from portal or outlook by changing settings in SWFVISU transaction.
3. Application completes the workflow by calling FM2.
Here FM1 is SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW which returns the workitem id. When I am giving the same workitem id in function module SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE , it is giving me error that Method SAP_WAPI_WORKITEM_COMPLETE not allowed for type F
My workflow has only one activity step which is mapped with class CL_PT_REQ_WF_ATTRIBS and method DUMMY. I have checked the synchronous method.
Please let me know how can I correct it.
With regards
Manu SharmaHi
You need to give the workitem id of the dialog task which has been configured in SWFVISU. You will get this workitem id via application parameter in your Webdynpro method.
Wokflow will be completed, if all the steps has been executed
Vinoth
Edited by: S Vinoth on Oct 27, 2010 10:08 AM -
Error : T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock tr
Hi Gurus,
When we creating a STO to sub contractor vendor ( in the delivery address tab we are entering the vendor # and activating the SC vendor check box)we are getting the error message as "T161W: Vendor+subcontracting vendor not allowed for 2-step stock transfer".
Message no: MEPO140
Note:
The STO is creating with out error in ECC 5.0 for the above scenario but when i'm trying the same in ECC 6.0 in another system I'm getting this error, Can any one please advice.
Thanks in advance,
SaiHi Charlie
I had same issue and we sloved it. but i have one more issue here.
We have created Po and SC Vendor is not check marked. When we go into the change mode of Po i can't see the field at all. but its availalbe in disply mode.
I am using ECC 6.0, Please suggest why this is happening. I need to put check mark for SC vendor.
thanks,
Raju
Maybe you are looking for
-
Dear All, I am getting an error while creating billing doc, system not doing automatic posting because of error in account determination for tax code. I maintained condition record, and also assign the tax code to GL account (GL also not blocked). al
-
When I am at home working on my computer and I recieve an iMessage, it will go to my iphone. A few seconds later it will alert me that Ive recieved an iMessage on my computer screen. Same thing with twitter DMs. This is a little annoying. I don't nee
-
my original computer had a virus and is no longer available. i have a new computer and would to sync my iphone and upgrade my operating system. how do i do that without losing all of my information on my iphone?
-
Jcombobox not visible in unix using JRE 1.6
There is a Java based admin tool in our project which is implemented using java swing. This admin tool works fine on Windows with all the JREs. But when I run it on Sun Solaris with Sun JRE 1.6.0_12, the drop down feature of jcombobox fails. It open
-
Overlaping in Standard Reports with Layout
Dear friends, When I am trying to take the Standard SAP Statutory Reports then the Values in the report are overlaping with the Layout of the form... How to resolve this... Any Replies please Thanks & Regards, Satya. Edited by: Satya Garikapati on