Actual Over Head Calculation for process order

hi!
I have created a costing sheet for over head, which will be based on labour activity cost.
the base is labour cost for which I have given secondary cost element ( assigned in activity type for labour hours) in costing sheet and maintained over head rate for planned & actual. in credit of costing sheet for over head I have given secondary cost element with internal order.
first question is : when internal order posting will happen? I am assuming , when production order settlement is done, over head cost has to be accrued to internal order. is my assumption is correct? because in line items of internal order , i couldn't see any thing.
second question is : in process order, system is showing over head cost under planned cost, but it is showing ZERO in actual cost column. I have executed KGI2, system is not showing any senders or receivers. but when I executed KGI2 with dialog dipslay check box, system shows the calculations as per cost sheet correctly under condition value column.
Please let me know where I missed ? how to get actual over heads in process order.
in process order in cost analysis in the actual/target cost layout, system is showing the over head costs. but where as in "cost trend" layout, system is not showing over head cost.
can any one help on above points.
regards,
ramesh b

Hi
Maintain the Overhead rate in KZM2 or KZZ2 as the case may be
Then execute CO43... The moment overhead is charged to Process order, it would post credit to IO
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

Actual activity price calculation for production order

Hi
Can any one guide me in how many ways we can assign actual activity price calculation for production order?
I knew only one way by assigning PPP2 costing variant?
I have another doubt is: if we don't mention any material valuation indicator (moving average, standard) in valuation variant, how system will calculate material prices? is there any other way, to recognize the prices by system?
regards,
Ramesh B

Dear,
Costing variant PPP2 is linked to some valuation variant inn OPL1
System will check the valuation of material and activity according to this valuation variant
For material valuation there are many stg acceding to which system will take the price the raw material,
Valuation strategy for material component
Strategy sequence that determines the valuation of the materials used in the cost estimate.
Use
The materials are valuated using the price in the material master record or the values calculated in a material cost estimate.
Procedure
You can enter a single strategy, or you can enter multiple strategies in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter multiple strategies, the priority of the strategy determines what price or what values are selected.
Examples
Assume that the following strategy sequence is entered for material valuation:
1. Planned price 1
2. Standard price
3. Moving average price
If the system finds a value in the Planned price 1 field (costing view), this value is taken as the value for valuating the material.
If the system does not find a value, the value in the Standard price field (accounting view) is used.
If the material does not have a standard price, the system uses the value from the Moving average price field.
if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found"
Valuation strategy for internal activities and processes-
Strategy sequence that determines how internal activities and processes are valuated in costing.
Use
The activities and business processes used are valuated with the prices from Cost Center Accounting or Activity-Based Costing to determine the production costs or process costs. The prices can either be calculated iteratively through price calculation, or entered manually by the user.
Procedure
You can enter either a single strategy or more than one strategy in the form of a strategy sequence. If you enter more than one strategy, the priority of the strategy determines which price is selected.
Examples
The following strategy sequence is entered:
1. Actual price of the previous period
2. Plan price of the previous period
3. The most current plan price
If the system finds a price for the activity type, this price is used for valuating the internal activities. If no price was calculated for the previous period, the plan price from the previous period is used to valuate the activity type.
If the system cannot find a plan price for the previous period, it looks for a future plan price, using the next price in the posting period to valuate the internal activities. For example, if plan prices have been entered for periods 2 and 3, and a plan price is calculated in period 1 for period 4, the system uses the price from period 3 in accordance with the valuation strategy Most up-to-date plan price.
Again if you have not mentioned, then system will give error that "valuation stg not found".
You can use any costing variant for actual (PPP2)and planned(PPP1) according to your requirement.. check in OPL1

Adding over heads to the process order

Dear All,
We are executing one projrect for which production of goods will be started from 01.01.2012.so for this we need to caculate cost of the product before the production order executed.
For RM one BOM will be created & issued to the production order so that the cost of RM can be identified with the production order.
For Over heads we need to provide the facility to enter manually for each order based on qty. & rate in the production order.
So that before the production order executed the total cost of the order can be arrived.
Now pl. advice how to provide the facility to enter manually for each order based on qty. & rate in the production order
Thanks
Shivaji

HI shivaji mohanty,
I have seent the same process in the Production Order. I hope it will work to process order also. Pl check the path
Contorllling --> Productin Cost Controlling --> Basic Settig for Material Costing --> OH Key & OH Group.
Pl do the necessary setting & assign the Process Order!
I hope it will work. pl check & revert back!
Regards
Raj

Inspection Lot for Process Order without Header Material

Guys,
We have an scenario that we create a Process Order without Header material using T code CORO. Is it possible to assign or create a Inspection lot for Process order?
Regards,
Senthilraja

Hi
Please refer
QPL10004 User subscreen for displaying additional data in insp. lot
Regards
Sujit

Tabale for Actual cost value for Process orders

Hi Friends
From which table can we retrive the actual values relates to process orderwise, like actual material consumption cost, activites cost, overhead cost and other costs.

Hi
You would find the actual for process orders in Table COEP with Object Number = OP*. Also Check if you would require COSS, COSP for Controlling Tables and to get the Object numbers you need to used AFPO with Order type of Process order PI01...
Regards,
Suraj

RE: Statastical internal order and over head calculation

Hello,
Can any one help me with this issue:
At my client location they did stack 14 upgrade recently. After this upgrade over head charges for goods issue from one department to another department are not being calculated. I checked the configuration and every thing looks fine for me. But when i do KGI4 i don't see any over head being calculated.
Thanks in advance

na

GR Cost not updating as Target Cost for process orders

Dear SAPians,
We are facing an issue in Target Vs Actual cost reporting for process orders. We are creating a process order after cost estimate of that material and doing the confirmations for activity cost. After that, GR has been done for the finished goods of that process order. That GR entry is updating the Actuals values but not updating the Target cost. When I am checking the standard report KKBC_ORD, I am getting the following figures.
Cost Elemnt Text     |     Target Cost     |     Actual Cost     |     Target Vs Act
Inventory Chnge FG     |     0     |     1,472,205.60-     |     1,472,205.60-
Packing Matrl Cons.     |     1,148,142.37     |     1,252,752.68     |     104,610.31
Raw Material Cons.     |     60,463.91     |     50,688.29     |     224.38
Semi-Fin Matrl Cns.     |     181,934.68     |     367,959.56     |     186,024.88
Labour Cost Activity     |     39,735.36     |     39,862.80     |     127.44
Machine Cst Activty     |     41,611.75     |     43,153.01     |     1,541.26
That 'Inventory Change FG' entry is showing the GR posting updating actuals and not target cost. This is causing huge difference in target vs actual cost that will affect the profit and loss figures ultimately.
What am I missing here? What should I do to update the GR amount in Target cost as well.
Shirazi

Dear,
Target Cost on Production Order or Process Order is shown only when Variance is Calculated.
So please calculate the Variance, system will show the Total Target Cost.
Br,Vivek

User Status Profile for Process Order Operations

Hello Experts.
I have a need to set up a User Status at the Process Order Operation level that will prevent operation confirmation when the status is Active .
I have been successful at the following:
   --- Created a new Status Profile (transaction BS02),
   --- Creating a u201CHoldu201D status,
   --- Defined the Influence on Business Transactions,
   --- Set the allowed Object Types for the profile.
   --- In an individual Process Order operation, I can now select the Status Profile, and set the Hold status, and it functions correctly.
My problem is that I canu2019t figure out how to set my new profile as a default for Process Order Operations. For Production Orders, this is done in the IMG definition for the Order Type (transaction OPJH), updating field T003O-VRG_STSMA. However the Order Type definition for Process orders (transaction CORN) only has a field for a status profile at the header level. Iu2019ve searched through Configuration and the Recipe, and the Production Version, and the Control Key, but can find no where to set the default status profile for a Process Order Operation..
As a final desperate act, I manually edited a T003O record for a Process Order Type in our test system, but even this failed to set a default Operation Status Profile for subsequently created Process Orders.
If you have any knowledge about this, then please help.

As of this date, we have still not implemented a fix, but I did get some information from someone else who has.
I'll post his information here for all to see. Hope you find it helpful.
From: Joe
Yes we managed to do it.
After several false starts and CMOD/projects which suffered because only the default keys (for order number, aufpl etc) were in place and not the actual, we coded up the IN_UPDATE method in the WORKORDER_UPDATE badi. This gives us the final format after the DB save (but before the commit). The update of the STATUS using the SAP std function module was actioned successfully but the status profile was not actually passed through. We assumed that this was because of the update task - so we introduced an INSERT into JSTO instead (a bit naughty I know, but desperate needs etc). If you require anything more let me know.
Best Regards
Joe

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status TECO

Hello all.
My question is the similar to WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV
But I need that
- if the Production order has status TECO - the system calculate WIP
- if the Production order has status DLV u2013 the system settle the order.
1. I try to change u201CStatus Numberu201D in TCODE OKGC. But I have receive two different result:
- if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status DLV from 3 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status DLV u2013 WIP have been calculated.
- but if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status TECO from 4 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status TECO u2013 WIP have been CANSELED.
2. I try to change results analysis key for status TECO from u201CZu201D to u201CFu201D in TCODE OKG3. BUT during WIP calculation the system create error message KJ 363 which require that results analysis key must be change to u201CZu201D
How can I resolve my problem?

Hi,
I don't have the answer if the requirement is that even after producing the materials, till the time accountant checks the order and does this action, it should remain in WIP. Honestly it doesn't make any sense to me or i have not understood this problem. Anyways as per my current understanding I can suggest the following process for your scenario.
Once production is stopped in between the process, the order should be in PDLV status (partial confirmations happened in the order)
Now go and clear the reservations manually from the production order .( delete the component line items from the order). Now depending on whether you are following WIP at actual cost, system will post the difference between credit and debit of that production order as WIP for the month end process.
Once Accountant okays the entries in the production order, he can do the TECO and settle the order. Now WIP will be reversed and variance will be posted.
To avoid the already produced goods mixing up with your other stock, u might want use Quality Management with the help of your PP consultant.
Best Regards
Vimal

Error in Over Head Calculation

Hi
We are on new GL and ECC 6.0. Splitting is active based on profit center and every plant is also a profit center. We have created secondary cost element in the system to record activity performed on production order. When doing the over head calculation system generates a poting between two different profit centers, which forced the system to create a corresponding entry in FI. We have switched off account determination in the variant for real time integration between CO & FI and also supressed the error message. Now when we do the Over calculation against the production order, system displays the error that the secondary cost element used in Over Head Calculation has not been created as GL Account in Our chart of Accounts. Pls suggest
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

na

For process order matrix

Hi All PP Gurus,
Scenario from production client:
Issue:
For process order number 6300355; material code 15010163 the assay calculation is not correct.
Process in use:
Process order is created through tcode COR1 and Transaction code ZACOR2 is used for update of requirement quantity, i.e. assay calculation. The quantity calculated against batch no. 0001004480 is not correct. The correct value is 14.013.
can u please help me regarding this issue?????

your question looks to be very vague as you are giving order no/material no/ batch no which no member can view. explain more detail about your scenario and issue so that somebody may try to help. sorry for putting my view in direct manner.
Thanks
JK

Configuration for Process order for Forms

Hi,
I want to develop a layout for Process Order.
Where we will do configure Print Program & Layout for Process Order like
what we do in NACE for SD&MM related layouts!
Will this Process Order supports both SAP Script & SMART Forms!
Can anybody clarify!
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi ,
In Process order transaction ,in output options declare the form name and output type. In TNAPR table in SE11 create on row with the above o/p type and form name. I think both forms will be possible.
Actually where ever script form possible means there you can create smartform also.
Thanks.
Suma.

Target cost calculation in Process Order based on Variance Calculation

Hi all,
I have a question on Target cost calculation in Process Order. My understanding is, the Target Costs gets calculated when the confirmation and GR is made for the Process Order.
But if the confirmation/GR is not done, whether the target costs gets calculated for only the activity types after the Variance Calculation (KKS2).
I have two scenarios. In one, the target costs got calculated for the activity types without the confirmation/GR after the Variance calculation.
In another scenario, the target costs are not getting calculated for the activity types without the confirmation/GR if I try to do the variance calculation in KKS2.
SO i want to know which scenario is correct?
Can anyone answer this question?
Thanks and Regards,
Brijesh

Hi,
In general, the target costs are calculated once you deliver the order.
Target costs for the components and the activities are updated only once you deliver the order and the target cost for the finished product gets updated when you do the variance calculation.
Consider your scenario number 1 - you said the target costs got calculated for activity types without confirmation / GR after variance calculation.
Now, if the order is not having any status like PDLV, DLV or TECO it will not calculate the variances in the first place.
Your second scenario is correct - without GR the system does not calculate any target costs. Also it will not calculate any variances because the order status is still not DLV.
Best Regards,
Sameer

Planned cost & actual cost are same in process order.

hi,
I have created new order type for process order.
when i made process order & i going for confirmation in cor6n , on screen fixed & variable overheads values are coming which system had taken from receipe.
when i did changes in that values which are in hrs & confirm & settle the order, in cost analysis plan cost & Actual cost was seem to be same.
I dont get why this is happen ? is there any config in order type.
thanks in advance.
regard
sanjay.

Check in cost analysis, IN plan VS actual Is activity is available?
I feel U haven't maintain activity type in costing view of workcenter

Understanding Target Cost Version Differences for 0 and 1 for process order

Our client need to understand the differences between our target cost versions that are utilized in calculating the process order CO03 cost analysis. When should each target version be used and why do the variances change? See example below.
Target Version = 1 Target Cost Prelim Order Cost Estimate
Version = 0 Target Cost for Prod Variances
Can you please provide analysis and help me on this.
I higly appreciate for your help.
Thanks in advance.
Seshadri

I recommend that you post this in CO forum.

Actual Over Head Calculation for process order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for