Adding over heads to the process order

Dear All,
We are executing one projrect for which production of goods will be started from 01.01.2012.so for this we need to caculate cost of the product before the production order executed.
For RM one BOM will be created & issued to the production order so that the cost of RM can be identified with the production order.
For Over heads we need to provide the facility to enter manually for each order based on qty. & rate in the production order.
So that before the production order executed the total cost of the order can be arrived.
Now pl. advice how to provide the facility to enter manually for each order based on qty. & rate in the production order
Thanks
Shivaji

HI shivaji mohanty,
I have seent the same process in the Production Order. I hope it will work to process order also. Pl check the path
Contorllling --> Productin Cost Controlling --> Basic Settig for Material Costing --> OH Key & OH Group.
Pl do the necessary setting & assign the Process Order!
I hope it will work. pl check & revert back!
Regards
Raj

Similar Messages

Actual Over Head Calculation for process order

hi!
I have created a costing sheet for over head, which will be based on labour activity cost.
the base is labour cost for which I have given secondary cost element ( assigned in activity type for labour hours) in costing sheet and maintained over head rate for planned & actual. in credit of costing sheet for over head I have given secondary cost element with internal order.
first question is : when internal order posting will happen? I am assuming , when production order settlement is done, over head cost has to be accrued to internal order. is my assumption is correct? because in line items of internal order , i couldn't see any thing.
second question is : in process order, system is showing over head cost under planned cost, but it is showing ZERO in actual cost column. I have executed KGI2, system is not showing any senders or receivers. but when I executed KGI2 with dialog dipslay check box, system shows the calculations as per cost sheet correctly under condition value column.
Please let me know where I missed ? how to get actual over heads in process order.
in process order in cost analysis in the actual/target cost layout, system is showing the over head costs. but where as in "cost trend" layout, system is not showing over head cost.
can any one help on above points.
regards,
ramesh b

Hi
Maintain the Overhead rate in KZM2 or KZZ2 as the case may be
Then execute CO43... The moment overhead is charged to Process order, it would post credit to IO
br, Ajay M

Mass updation of Priority field in the process order header screen

Hi Friends,
Can any body knows on how to do mass update the Priority field in the process orders after release.(with out upload using BDC).
or can we update the priority field in process order during mass release of process orders using T- code: COHVPI?
Is there any standard transaction? else please tell me the solution if there is any other way of doing this task.
thanks&regards,
Purna

Purnachander,
Your requirement can not be fullfilled with any standard transaction.
BDC is best suitable option.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

Error while releasing the Process order

while releasing the Process order i am getting the follwing error message
Message no. CO118 Release of order not possible
Cna you Please any body explain me detail of thi error ie where the error lies.
Thanks

Hi,
In Process Order Header Screen Go to ---> Log ---> On Release.Here you will find the detail error behind this problem.Go though it .Resolve it and then try to release the Process Order, and if required get back to us.
Suppose reason may be,
- Missing part
- Missing Capacity
- Batch Determination is required to perform.
- Any User Exit (Other then std. SAP)
Regards,
Dhaval

Automated TR creation while release the Process Order

I have to split the quantity into smaller units based on the ‘LE quantity’ before TR creation. In transaction LB03, there should be additional line items after the quantity split.
I am using the EXIT ‘EXIT_SAPLLCPP_001’. It is triggering during the transaction run. But it doesn’t serve the purpose.
Can anyone help me to achieve this functionality?

Hi,
In Process Order Header Screen Go to ---> Log ---> On Release.Here you will find the detail error behind this problem.Go though it .Resolve it and then try to release the Process Order, and if required get back to us.
Suppose reason may be,
- Missing part
- Missing Capacity
- Batch Determination is required to perform.
- Any User Exit (Other then std. SAP)
Regards,
Dhaval

Unable to do GR more than the process order quantity

When we try to do a GR against a process order (MIGO), and we use a quantity more than the process order, then the system is issuing an 'error' message.
Say process order is for 37000L, confirmation is done for 39000L (COR6): works
But when we try the MIGO or MB31, for the GR, then the system issues error as M7022: 'quantity exceeded by 2000L'.
Checked: 1) OMCQ and the message M7/ 022 is set as 'w', warning.
2) Also, the permissible batch size is 35000L - 39700L
Please advice.
Thnx!

Hi
you need to have an overdelivery tolerance (i.e 10%) in the process order header - goods receipt tab.
The tolerance should be maintained in the work scheduling view of the material. Then it is copied into the process order automatically.
BR
Eivind

Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
Hi Gurus,
I am a beginner in this area and request your help.
We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
Case 1:
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only 100 is accepted.
2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
Case 2: (The one with the problem)
1. Order Qty =100 ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
     Which means only the 100 is accepted.
2. 25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
5. The Process order allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are same .
so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Suraj

Hi Suraj,
I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI. It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly.
However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
First create a few process orders to test with.
Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using).
2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction.
Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters)
Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs.
Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using. It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP). Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
Good luck,
Mike
Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

Error while saving the process order

Hi All,
I changed the quantities of the components and trying to save the process order. But I'm getting a message " "PLEASE REEXPLODE BOM, SINCE THE PROCESS ORDER COMPONENTS HAVE CHANGE". What would be the reason? It is not happening to all the users. Some users can able to save after changing the qty. Some users can't?
Regards,
Sureshbabu G.

Hi,
"PLEASE REEXPLODE BOM, SINCE THE PROCESS ORDER COMPONENTS HAVE CHANGE"
I think it is your Develpment and not from SAP Standard One.So it is difficult to trace out the cause, better will be contact your devlopment team to trace out the reason.
Regards,
Dhaval

How does the GR processing time affect the scheduling of the process order & the latest start date in the operation.

Hi
Can anyone explain how does the GR processing time affect the scheduling of the process order & the latest start date in the operation overview.

Hi
GR processing time means number of workdays required after receiving the material in storage.
Check this link:GR Processing time
Regards,
Anupam Sharma

Not able to see the Cost analysis in the Process order (T-Code COR2).

Hi SAP Guru's
Csoting in the Process order Configuration.
I have done the Config setting related to the Product Costing Controlling with regard to the
Cost Sheet, Cost Componet Structure.Overheads, asssigning the Cost elements in the Costing sheet.
assigned the same in the Process order.
And also the Costing variant options seen in OPL1 t-code can not be displayed in the Process order Csoting Variant selection.
where as the in the Costing variant for the cost component structure, i can see the Xompany code with required plant details.
looking the costing alanysis data in Process order, unable to see

Hi,
If you are looking at cost analysis. You will get this only some you do confirmations to the production or process Order.
I hope you did confirmation of material and quantities to the Process Order
Best Regards
Surya

Fiscal Year Not allowed while creating the Process order (COR1)

Hi Friends,
My Indian client is following the Fiscal year of 2011 for the period of April 2010 to March 2011). We have gone live one month before. But now the problem we are facing is while creating the process order (T.Code COR1) system gives the error message "Fiscal year 2010 is not allowed".
The Diagnosis shows as below
Fiscal year 2010 is not allowed
Message no. F5568
Diagnosis
The fiscal year entered (2010) is different from the fiscal year derived from the posting date and fiscal year variant (2011).
System Response
Error.
Procedure
Correct the fiscal year entered.
I have Checked the Controlling area version. Fiscal Year 2011 starts from 01.04.2010. This issue is only at the time of Process oder creation and not in other module like FI, MM, SD, PS, QM and PM. I have checked with V3 Variant also and there is no problem with that.
Can any one help me where the setting is missing or what whould be the probable reason for this issue.
Regards,
Deva

Hi Prakash,
Thank you for your reply. I have checked the MMPV and MMRV set up and that is fine with fiscal year 2011. We are also processed lot many Material receipts for the fiscal year 2011. I have checked with OB52 for finace it is opened for the entire year of 2011 from 2009 for all periods.
We are facing only when we try to create the process order. When we enter the starte date as 24.11.2010 the derived period shows as fiscal year 2011. But entered fiscal year shows as 2010. We are not entering any other dates in the process order.
Is there any other probablity the date is picking from any Production related set ups??
The costing version fiscal year 2011 starts from 01.04.2010. So no problem with Controlling area. I have Checked the Factory calendar. The calendar starts from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.2010 for the year 2010.
Is there any other possibility of the missing settings or problem in date control???
Regards,
Deva

Problem of Missing parts during the Process Order release

Hi
For a Make to Order strategy, I have run MRP for a sales order which resulted in planned order for the material. But when I try to convert the Planned Order to Process Order, I am getting error Parts are missing during the availabilty check even though the components are available in the stock.
But when I create a Process Order manually, I am not facing the problem of missing parts as stock for components are available in stock.
Please advice why I am facing the problem with Planned Orders which are created via MRP.
Regards
Brijesh

Dear all,
If we set the Individual requirement (1) in MRP4 view of the material master for the component, the system will not consider the plant stock and it will give the message like Parts are missing during the Process Order process even though the plant stock is exists for the component.
So I would like to where in customization you define this?
--> To not consider the plant stock if individual req is set (1)
--> To consider the plant stock if collective req is set (2)
Kindly advice,
Regards,
Brijesh

Problem in TECOing/Closing the process order.

Hi PP Gurus,
We're facing a problem when trying to TECO the process order and system is generating the error message
Message no. BS013 (System status CRCR is active (ORD 1000xxxxxx))
We're using Browser based PI sheet here to process the order.
If anybody faced the same, please reply.
Regards,
Abu Arbab

Hi Rupesh,
Thanks for reply
Though we set 'Clear Reservation' in intial screen of COR6N/CORK/CO15/Co11N, it'll wok only for those components which are having Backflush indicator set. As in PI sheet, Goods Issues section is completely different and Ticket confirmation is different. And the components that we're using are not backflushed components, so it makes no sense though we put Clear Reservation in confirmation through PI sheet.
Now the actual issue comes into picture when in Goods Issue table we put Issue indicator= final and it is properly updated for that component in MSEG table. But when we go and check in RESB table or COR3/COR2 there is no final indicator set in Component detail. Is this standard behavior of SAP or are we missing something here?
Please help
Regards,
Abu Arbab

Confirmation number sequence in the process order

Hi,
When we create a process order , system assigns the confirmation no for each of the operation & these confirmation numbers are in sequence.
In our case we have activity numbers in the recipe as 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0050, 0060...... Subsequently we have inserted operations..now the sequence has become 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0041, 0042, 0050, 0060...... Now when we create the process order, the confirmation numbers for operations 0041, 0042 comes after 0060. We have a development which has a pre-requisite that the sequence of confirmation no's should be as per sequence of operations.
Any idea how to achieve the correct sequence of confirmation no's?
regards,
Mohit

Dear Mohit,
I have find the route cause BUT I Don't know how to fix it
Based on Operation ID, system is creating a confirmation No
Since you have created a operation 41 and 42, System gives the operation ID next to 60
Thats the reason system is giving the confirmation No after 60
I don't know how To add operation ID in routing

Reprint the processed order with BDC call transaction

Hi Mentors,
I have a problem with printing the order which is coming in a cockpit program.
for that i am using the bdc and call transaction 'ZVA31' which is exactly the standard program 'SD70AV1A'.
but after first processing i am not able to reprint the processed order.
Below is my bdc code and i am using processing mode 1 at the time of recording.
FORM ZSD70AV1A_PRINT_BA01 USING p_vbeln TYPE vbeln.
DATA: wa_ba01 TYPE nast-kschl VALUE 'BA01'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SD70AV1A' '1000'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
'RG_KSCHL-LOW'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
'=ONLI'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RG_KSCHL-LOW'
wa_ba01."wa_ba01."'ba01'.
perform bdc_field       using 'PM_NSORT'
'01'.
perform bdc_field       using 'PM_VERMO'
'1'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RG_VBELN-LOW'
p_vbeln."'513785'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMSSY0' '0120'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
'04/03'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
'=&ALL'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMSSY0' '0120'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
'04/03'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
'=PROC'.
CALL TRANSACTION 'ZVA31' USING BDCDATA
MODE   'A'
MESSAGES INTO MESSTAB.
CLEAR BDCDATA[].
ENDFORM.                    " ZSD70AV1A_PRINT_BA01
Br,
Surya

Solved myself.
DATA: wa_ba00 TYPE nast-kschl VALUE 'BA00'.
DATA: p_vermo TYPE kschl.
DATA: cur_vstat TYPE nast-vstat.
SELECT SINGLE vstat INTO cur_vstat FROM nast
WHERE objky = p_vbeln
AND   kschl = 'BA00'.
IF sy-subrc = 0 AND cur_vstat = 0.
p_vermo = '1'."wa_vstat.
ELSE.
p_vermo = '2'.
ENDIF.
p_vermo is processing status.
Br,
Surya

Adding over heads to the process order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for