Ad-Hoc count by material - WM Level

Hello,
How can I perform a ad-hoc count in SAP WM level for a material?
The client wants to be able to count a material on a ad-hoc basis.
I used LX16..but it wont let me choose by material.
Can anyone help.
--Sidd

dont assume, test it.
An ad-hoc count is not continous inventory either.
I did not say you have to remove the indicator for continous inventory, I just said you have to allow Cycle Count, as this is a precondition to use LICC.
In general, in WM you have to count by bins, not by materia, means each material in a single bin, if you have mixed storagel.  LICC was specially developed to allow counting by material and counting just a single material out of many stored together in a bin.

Similar Messages

  • Creating Physical Inventory at Material/Quant level

    Hi,
    Is it possible to do Physical inventory at material /quant level in the Warehouse management.
    We dont want to do cycle count.
    Is their a way to do physical inventory at material/quant level

    Hi
    With WM you can do Continuous Inventory which counts at the bin level AND if you want to count by Material you can use transaction LICC to do this but in transaction OMNK you set the Invent method to PZ and select the Cycle count box (And the rest of the settings for physical inventoy)
    You then have to make your settings for cycle counting in OMCO
    Once this is done you can use either to count with
    I hope that this helps
    Frenchy

  • ME21N Material group level authorization is not working in ECC 6.0

    Dear Security Experts,
    We have created a role Z_ME21N with one Tcode ME21N. The role has to restrict users in the material group level.
    For that, we added Authorization object M_MATE_WGR.
    1.     When we are trying to add field values for {M_MATE_WGR, BEGRU}, generally it should show me the list possible values to be used based on the MM configuration related to Material Authorization Group. We have correctly configured the authorization groups from V_TBRG for M_MATE_WGR. But itu2019s not showing any possible values.
    2.     However we are able to add values manually, but I guess these are not being considered during authorization check and our restriction on Authorization group level in ME21N is not working.
    Test Scenario: We have manually added values 005,007,009,010,013 (which is pointing to specific material group) to BEGRU of M_MATE_WGR. We already assigned this Authorization Object to role Z_ME21N and this role has been assigned to u2018testuseru2019, but the authorization check with the M_MATE_WGR authorization group is not happening. It allows operations on all the material groups.
    Anybody came accross same scenario?
    SAP Prodcut version : ECC 6.0
    Database : SQL Server 2005
    Support pack level : 15
    Please share your views, thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Abu Sandeep

    Dear All,
    I got a reply just now from SAP regarding the same issue.
    I coudnt understand what SAP and you are saying.
    Dear Abu
    *Apologies for the delay. This message has been turned on to application*
    *area of MM from the Basis side just now.*
    *Unfortunately, authorization object "M_MATE_WGR " is not checked*
    *in the purchasing transactions (PR & PO), the system works as standard*
    *functional designed.*
    *Only the following objects are checked in PR/PO:*
    *M_BEST_BSA Document Type in PO M_BANF_BSA Document Type in PR*
    *M_BEST_EKG Purchasing Group in PO M_BANF_EKG Purchasing Group in PR*
    *M_BEST_EKO Purchasing Org. in PO M_BANF_EKO Purchasing Org. in PR*
    *M_BEST_WRK Plant in PO M_BANF_WRK Plant in PR*
    *Setting in check/maintain on in SU24 only means that the profile*
    *generator will propose the object when creating a user, however is*
    *does not mean that M-MATE_WGR will be checked.*
    *Please close this message by pressing the confirm button at your*
    *earliest convenience.*
    *Many thanks in advance for your understanding.*
    So, how can I resolve this problem? John, are you sure that, you implemented this successfully?
    SAP says, this cant be done.
    Regards,
    Abu Sandeep.

  • Multiple Country of Origin at a Material Master level- Foreign Trade import

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a requirement to store Multiple Country of origin at a Material Master level . One Part/Material is sourced from different vendors and they are manufactured in different countries . Please note that we are not using Batch Management . Is there any workaround to have this scenario without using standard Batch Management .
    Thanks,
    Prabuddha

    hi,
    you can use split valuation for this by using the valuation category field in material master in accounting 1 view.
    in this you have to maintain valuation category as "H" = ORIGIN.
    For split valution procedure you have to reffer the  follow this link.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm025.htm
    THANKING YOU

  • Purchase Requisition restriction at Material Type level

    Hi MM Guru's
    as per Client requirment
    we want to restrict the Purchase Requisition creation at Material type level (i.e system should raise the error messege when we try to create the PR against Finished Goods) is that possible
    if yes how can we restrict the PR ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Please do the following setting in SPRO-LOgistics general-Materila master- Basin setings- DEfine attribute for materila type . Here select FERT as materila type and go to details and select tab
    Internal and external urchase orders and give zero -External POs not allowed.
    While creating PR for this materila type, system will issue error message.
    REgards
    Ram

  • Assign the quality type =01 at material type level

    Hi,
    I am working with quality Management , Here Client want to all Raw material is check at time of receiving .So We want to Assign the quality type =01 at material type level .
    How we can do that??
    Individual Material assignment is not possible because here more the 1lac material.
    Pl guide me for resolution of this problem

    Hii Mr.Tiwari
    I am hoping that you have created the QM view for the subjected materials. If you have created then you would have to give value in Inspection Plan setup. That is something insertion of values rather than updating / changing the data.
    Please clear if I am wrong.
    kapil

  • Control the authorization base on material type level

    Dear Experts,
    We want to control some users only can create or modify the material base on material type level .
    For instance , user A only can modify the 'ROH' type material , he can not maintain any 'FERT' type material .
    I set the authorization object 'M_MATE_MAR' in the user A's profile , but it doesn't work .....
    System : SAP4.7 x 200
    DB : oracle9i
    Has someone can tell me it is possibile to control the maintain authorization base on material type level ?
    Or give me some suggestions.....
    Many thanks
    Best Regards,
    Carlos Zhang

    Hi
    Yes this works & the authorisation object found by you is also correct.
    For the object - M_MATE_MAR
    Maintain the activity 01,02,03
    Maintain the authorisation group  - each material type can be assigned to an authorisation group. In OMS2 , you can assign the authorisation groups to the material type.
    For E.g if the material type is ROH- enter the authorisation group as ROH.
    Ensure that the user does not have this object, As If this object is present in any other role with authorisation group as * then the * will overirde any value.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore
    Edited by: Kishore Kumar Chiluka on Jun 13, 2008 11:18 AM

  • Need to check PO Posting date at schedule line and material document level

    HI All,
    I am facing an issue to reconciliation data with ECC.
    Issue :
    we have a PO,item,schedule line with delivery date, scheduled qty and quantity received from EKET table
    we have PO,item,Material document,movement type,posting date with quantity received from EKBE table
    the standard extractor 2LIS_02_SGR is providing data at
    PO,item,schedule line,material document,movement,posting date
    as if now we are using this extractor to get the posting date at schedule line level.
    can some one let me know how exacty the EKET and EKBE table are joined ???

    Hi,
    The data for the datasource 2lis_02_sgr can be compared in ECC using ME80FN transaction.
    Please check the below Link for all the details reragrding 2LIS_02_SGR datasource.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_dm40/helpdata/en/69/063f3f2615e07fe10000000a114084/content.htm]
    Hope this helps..
    Thanks,
    Nagarjuna

  • Inventory Count (1 material under 1 loc have multiple tags)

    Hi,
    SAP standard inventory count is 1 material 1 location can only have 1 physical document. But our scenario is based on the tag number (which means there will be different tag number for the same code), and our tag number does not have any linkage to the SAP standard inventory count program. This is because even in the same location, our material will be at different places, and we might use more than 1 tag for the same material.
    For example our scenario (1 loc 1 material multiple tags):
    Tag No      Material Code
    CA00001     CPS756
    CA00002     CPS756
    CA00003     CPS518
    CA00004     CPS518
    CA00005   CPS518
    CA00006   CPS632
    Whereas the SAP standrd program is (1 loc 1 material 1 line item):
    100000182     1     CPS756
    100000182     2     CPS518     
    100000182     3     CPR632
    This will help a lot to ease the entering as the user just need to enter the count according to the tag number, and also reduce any typo error. And if we enter according to SAP method, we will have to sum up the total of all the same code, then only enter the count qty.
    Kindly please advise.

    Hello Sim,
    There are several possibilities you can think about,
    1. If you are considering your tags as a batch number then you can put the material number and batch number while creating Physical Inventory.
    2. If materials are in different places then you can consider these different places as a different storage location.
    3. You can manage your stock with Warehouse mangement functionality (This will be the best option, but will be required to activate warehouse management and lots of data conversion activities).
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Arif Mansuri
    Award if answer is helpful.

  • Material Plant Level or Planning Plant Level

    Hi Experts,
    May i know what ever the material lying in the warehouse whether it is showing the stock at Maitnenance Plant level or Planning Plant level.
    Also is it possible to keep the inventry at Maintnenace Plant level.
    Please provide your valuable information.
    AR

    Hi Experts,
    You mean to say if there is no planning Plant we cant make the inventory ? Please correct me if i am wrong.
    Also i want to know is it possible to maintain the stock at Maintenance Plant level.Because we have four  Maintenace Plant 8000,4000,1000 & 6000 and all four are assigned under one Planning Plant 2000. Here i want to know is it posssible to maintain the stock under all four Maintenance Plant if yes then what i have to do for the same.
    AR

  • Material Classification (Level Wise)

    Dear Experts,
    We want to Classify our Material like below:
    Level-1:      Direct / Indirect
    Level-2:     Raw material / packaging / consumables / Proffesional Services / Transport etc.
    Level-3:     Iron          /             Eletrical           /    Chemical                 /      Mechanical      /        Utilities                        / etc.
    Level-4:     Cast/Pig   /   capacitor/battery/Cable/      Acids/Lubricants    /      Gear/Pump     /   Gas/water/Electricity  / etc.
    Level-5:     Material Code
    This will be a hierarchy Level (Tree Like) Classification means ->
    level-1
    level-2
    level-3
    level-4
    level-5
    Please suggest how i Incorporate this >>>
    Thanks in Advance,
    Satya

    Dear Sathya,
    First you have to create all the names you have mentioned against each level as individual classes. The following are the steps
    1. Create Classes for Direct/Indirect, Raw material, Chemical and so on for the required names in all levels
    2. Assign the level 2 classes(raw material, chemical etc) to level 1 class(Direct/indirect)
    3. Assign level 3 classes(Iron/Pig,HCL, Gear pump etc.) to level 2 class
    4. Assign Level 4 classes to level 3 and
    5. Assign Level 5 class to Level 4 class
    For the assignment of classes to superior classes use transaction CL24N. Here you can define the common chararcteristics for all levels in the relevant superior classes and object specific characteristics in the lower level classes. For example, Manufacturer can be a character which can be common for all the sub-classes. Hence you can assign this characterisic to Level 1 or 2 depending on the need. Whereas Concentration of acid can be a character which can be defined at the level 4, since it is very specific to an acid. Since the classes are linked through a hierarchy, you will also get the characteristics of superior classes along with the object specific characters during assignment in the material master as an inheritance.
    By doing this, you have now formed the class heirarchy, you can see the hierarchy in CL6C transaction(graphical). Now assign the relevant class to the materials while creating the material master for each catergory of material. Once this is done, you can use transaction CL30N to find the materials based on characteristic values.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Sridharan.M
    Edited by: Sridharan Muthappan on Dec 31, 2009 12:30 AM

  • AD-hoc approver n step item level shopping cart workflow

    Hi
    We are on latest version of SRM and using n step item level SC approval workflow.
    The scenario goes like this:
    -     Requester creates shopping cart and workflow goes for two step approval.
    -     In the approval preview the requester is able to see both levels of approvers, which is correct.
    -     Requester now selects second level approver and replaces him with a ad-hoc approver. WE DO NOT WANT THIS.  Requester should NOT be able to replace an approver determined by approval badi. However should be able to extend approval step with ad-hoc approver say third level approver a ad-hoc approver. Also he should be able to change AD-HOC approvers ONLY.
    Thanks
    Joe

    Jo,
      You may be able to achieve it in the BADI BBP_WFL_SECUR_BADI .
    You can use the Business Add-In (BAdI) BBP_WFL_SECUR_BADI to determine whether
    A shopping cart can be changed during the approval process
    The approval workflow restarts when changes are made to the document
    A reviewer/approver can be added or changedThese are the call scenarios (see import parameter SCENARIO).
    Regards,
    Suren

  • Total node count of a top level VI.

    Hello everybody,
    I've came across a problem, in a top-level VI, I want to know:
    a> the total nodes count
    b> nodes count which are member of vi.lib
    c> nodes count which are member of user.lib.
    Now after using 'SuperPrivateScriptingFeatureVisible=True' & 'SuperSecretPrivateSpecialStuff=True', I got a private property node 'Matrics >> Advance' and using the cluster output of the 'read only' property, I got the total nodes count.
    Now the actual problem is to know, out of total nodes, which all are member of vi.lib and user.lib.
    I am not allergic to Kudos, in fact I love Kudos.
     Make your LabVIEW experience more CONVENIENT.

    Just to give you some background:
    Nodes are a lot of different things: Functions, Structures, SubVIs, ... are you interested in counting ForLoops as well?
    In your case, I'd use the TRefTraverse (It's in the Utility folder) to get all SubVIs. Then check the path. There are some OpenG 'Path Constants' for vi.lib and user lib. So just wire the output of the TRefTravese and check VI.path against does constants and count up.
    Alternatively, you can use the Vi.Calees property. But this will only return you one count for each SubVI no matter how many instances you placed in the BD.
    Felix
    www.aescusoft.de
    My latest community nugget on producer/consumer design
    My current blog: A journey through uml

  • Q-Info Record found for material rev level 06

    Dear All
    I have an error Q-info record found for material xxx rev level 06 while doing migo inbound delivery. Even i verify with some documents also but till not to come out of this problem. Is any body having solution.
    Please specify whether it is minor or major problem.
    Awaiting for ur reply

    In QI01/QI02--->You must have created the quality Info record for the vendor /material/revision combination.
    Suppose Material for which PO is cretaed is having latest revision 6 & infor record exists for rev 5 or less and not for rev level 6 ,then you may get this error.Also if relase date for vendor /material/revision combination is not valid then also you can get such error.
    only way is you can create with future relase date..and chaeck again.

  • Get Process Order Confirmation&Counter from material document/goods receipt

    Hi @ all,
    i´m looking for a way (the tables) to get the order confirmation and the counter from a goods receipt. I have the material document number und the position of the goods receipt.
    Kind regards,
    Axxter

    Hi,
    we don´t have the goods receipt material documents in AFRU. I don´t know the reason why.
    Message was edited by:
            Sebastian Becker

Maybe you are looking for