Adavance Adapter  Engine Performance Tuning

Hi all,
We are using PI-7.11 .  We are working on an asynchronus scenario that reads JMS queue and  calls  server proxy at the receiver. The interface is configured  to bypass the ABAP stack(Integration server) by  using advance adapter configuration. The PI-7.11 supports Proxy through a soap apter at the receiver. All this works fine and problem we are facing is the message processing time. Currently we are getting  a throughput of 10 messages per second and each message of size 2k.  If we combine 100 such messages into a single message then we get a throughput of 50  single messages per second. To keep up the incoming messages on the sender queue, we need to process at least 30 messages per sec. Instead of packaging(combing) the messages , we  created a couple of communication channels to read the same JMS queue and simulated the multi-threading on reading the sender queue. The reason we are doing this because we do not  want write an intermediate process to package the messages from the source system.  The bottle neck we are seeing in  the RWB(Run time work bench) is the 'DispatchDisp' queue  in  the adapter engine. Based on the RWB display, this queue has single thread  and it can not keep up  with the multiple senders .  Anyone knows how this queue being used in the Advance adapter engine and how can we change this to multiple threads.  Is it used before calling the PI mapping  or after calling the mapping ? We are able to increase the number of consumer threads of other queues related to the JMS  queue in the adapter engine.
Thanks in advance.
Meghanth

Hi Meghanth,
From what i hear it sounds like you can push more into your adapter engine with the JMS sender then your SOAP receiver can process in the same time, right?
The DispatchDisp Thread (1) is usually not the bottle neck, as far as i know the Dispatcher is just dedicated to dispatch messages to the receiver threads.
If you see an accumulation there (i guess in Message Display Tool->Engine Status under Queues) its a typical sign, that your receiver Threads are all busy and cannot accept more at that time.
How many Threads did you assign to your SOAP Receiver?
Usually the possible count for throughput with the available Threads is easy to calculate that way:
E.g. transfer to your ECC takes 200 ms (check your audit log steps) -> you can process about 5 / second / Thread ..with e.g. 5 Threads maximum 25/sec).
You can try analyze this with the "old" MessagingSystem Monitoring, there are timestamps in milliseconds available. (http://<host>:<port>/MessagingSystem).
According to that i d try to improve the count of your possible receiver threats..(take care that there are enought threads overall on your machine and the receiver ECC can take this).
With best regards
                  Sebastian

Similar Messages

  • Adapter Engine: Performance Monitoring?

    Dear Experts
    I am assessing the PI 7.1 Advanced Adapter Engine and execute a Performance Test against a standard
    scenario using the Adapter Engine processing.
    I would like to understand and see the 'performance boost', mentioned by SAP, but I am not able to find
    a tool which gives me this view on performance (e.g. message processing time) in the Adapter Engine.
    The Runtime Workbench tab 'Performance Monitoring' seems to be limited to the ABAP Integration Server.
    Is there any settings I can use to get this view? Or is there any other metric which could be used to
    validate the actual performance improvement by the AAE?
    Thanks for you ideas.
    Mathias.

    Hi,
    You use the Advanced Adapter Engine to connect the Integration Engine to SAP systems (RFC adapter) and non-SAP systems. You use the various adapters in the Adapter Engine to convert XML- and HTTP-based messages to the specific protocol and format required by these systems, and the other way around.
    Using Integrated Configuration you can define a local Message Processing on the Advanced Adapter Engine. The Advanced Adapter Engine provides mapping and routing for this locally. Message Processing is only executed on the Advanced Adapter Engine from one adapter to another without the involvement of the Integration Engine. You can gain a great improvement in performance.
    You can implement all adapters on the Adapter Engine for a local Message Processing on the Advanced Adapter Engine, apart from the RNIF adapters and the CIDX adapters.
    If you do not use Integrated Configuration, Message Processing will always be performed by the Integration Engine to execute the routing and mapping there.
    The Advanced Adapter Engine is a separate software component that is automatically installed on the Integration Server. In this case, it is the central Advanced Adapter Engine. However, you can also install the Advanced Adapter Engine separately on another host. This is then a non-central Advanced Adapter Engine.
    Please reward points if it helps
    Thanks
    Vikranth

  • SAP Netweaver Performance Tuning

    Guys,
    I am good in SAP J2EE Engine Performance Tuning. I would like to learn SAP ABAP Based Server Performance tuning end to end. Please recommend me some links/docs to start with the performance tuning for different OS like HP-UX/AIX & for Databases : Oracle/MaxDB etc.
    Thank you in advance.
    Cheers, Karthick

    Hi Karthick, for example for SAP with Oracle on AIX -->
    white paper -->
    http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100377
    But SAP with Oracle tuning are usually not very much dependent on the platform, of course there are differences but they are not much.
    Personally, I bought the SAP Performance Optimization Guide -->
    http://www.sap-press.com/products/SAP-Performance-Optimization-Guide-(5th-Edition).html?
    and SAP Database Administration with Oracle
    http://www.sap-press.com/products/SAP-Database-Administration-with-Oracle.html
    Nice books. Regards.

  • Decentral Adapter Engine

    Currently documentation only indicates the ability to create a single decentralized adapter engine.  (1) Is this in addition to the existing central adapter engine or do I have to choose which one I will use?  (2) Does the decentralized adapter engine have to run on its own WAS?  (3) If I am planning for a high volume of messages will the decentralized adapter engine perform load balancing for my integration engine?  (4) Can I have more than one decentralized adapter engine?  (5) If so, how do I configure these decentralized adapter engines to communicate to my integration engine?  (6) In addition, how do I control message flow from the integration engine to 1 to many decentralized adapter engines?    Feedback as well as any reference to additional information is much appreciated.

    Hi Kirk,
    (1): in addition
    (2): no, jou need to install J2SE adapter engine
    (3): yes
    (4): as much as you like
    (5): you configure like in XI 2.0 with configuration files. That is described at the XI documentation. For messages going to decentral adapter use channel XI with specified URL, for incoming messages you don't need a channel.
    (6):1 to many: Just put your receivers to receiver determination.
    Regard,
    Udo

  • Decentral adapter engine questions

    Guru's,
    My customer's XI 3.0 system has interfaces to 30 partners, almost all using the SOAP adapter. It turns out that when XI sends  a high volume of messages to one partner and this partner is not responding (system down, network issues, etc.) all messages to the other 29 systems are blocked/timing out in the soap adapter because this adapter cannot deliver it's messages to the misbehaving partner.
    Therefor the customer wants to have a dedicated AE for business critical processes. They claim they need a decentral adapter engine to achieve this.
    My question: is that the best solution in this case? The customer has a CI and DI on different hosts and thus already two AE. Can't they make use of that to split important/less important traffic to their partners?
    Assume the DAE is needed anyway. We want to install that on the same hardware as the XI system itself, because most of the connectivity is already in place.
    Question: Does this DAE need it's own SID or can it use the same SID as XI itself with a unique instance number? If the DAE needs it's own SID, then I need to create a database as well (+ backup + database maintenance)...
    There is also the requirment to use 2048-bit certificates. The current  XI 3.0 supports only 1024-bit, NW 7.00 supports 2048-bit.  Is it supported by SAP to have a XI 3.0 system with a NW 7.00 Decentral Adapter Engine?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rob Veenman
    SAP Basis.

    Hi Rob
    I can't answer all your questions but I can offer some tips that will help improve the performance and perhaps you will not need to install the DAE.
    1) you can increase the number of queues/threads available to the SOAP adapter. This will help with performance issues in high load situations.
    See the blog: /people/kenny.scott/blog/2007/08/20/messaging-system-queue-properties-after-xi-30-sp19-xi-70sp11 for details on how to do this.
    2) apply note #1136790 Blocking receiver channel may affect the whole adapter type. The parameter in this note will help prevent a problem with one SOAP channel, for example, blocking all your other SOAP channels. This will allow other interfaces to operate as normal if the high load interface has problems.
    See the blog: /people/kenny.scott/blog/2008/12/05/xipi-file-and-jdbc-receiver-adapter-performance-and-availability-improvements
    You should be on a SP higher than SP20 to avail of the functionalities in points 1 and 2 above.
    3) also ensure note #937159 XI Adapter Engine is stuck. This will help with the Adapter Engine performance.
    Maybe some of the other forum users can help you with your other questions.
    Regards
    Mark

  • "Performance" problems with the File adapter on Plain J2SE Adapter Engine

    Hi,
    At the moment I'm on a customer side to solve some XI issues for a few days. One of the issues is the performance of the Plain J2SE Adapter Engine, using the file adapter to transfer XML messages(already XI message format) from the legacy system to the Integration Engine. The File adapter has to deal with "large" XML messages(max at the moment is 65 Mb) and the engine fails with the following error when transferring the big XML file: "ERROR: Finished sending to Integration Engine with error "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError". Skip confirmation and quit this loop".
    As far I got the information from the customer the memory use of the Plain adapter engine is set to 512Mb. This is maybe to low. But I don't know where to look for this, I only have the adapter web interface in front of me, no access to the OS it self via for example remote connection.
    On the Integration Engine I know there is the ability to split large message with the file adapter(File Content Conversion), but I don't know this for the Plain Adapter Engine. Is there a possibility to do this also on the Plain Adapter Engine?
    Thanks in advance for any input.
    Greetings,
    Patrick

    Hi Sameer,
    Thanks for your answers.
    On the first solution, yes that is possible, we first decided to see if the legacy system can do the splitting, before starting developing a Java program.
    On the second solution, as far as I know is this solution possible on the Integration Engine. But we are facing the problems on the Plain J2SE Adapter Engine. I went trough that documentation(link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6f/246b3de666930fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm ), to look for I similiar solution in the Plain Adapter Engine. So my question is, is this possible with the Plain Adapter? And if so, what kind of parameters I need to use to achieve this.
    Regards,
    Patrick

  • 1636215 - Performance monitoring for the Advanced Adapter Engine

    Hi ALL,
    How can we monitor the performance by changing the parameter to true in the above note please please help me
    Thanks,
    Raj

    Hi Dheeraj,
    Since you've gone through the note, I'm assuming you know how to activate the performance monitoring for adapter engine.
    However, there are reservations against doing it in any system Dev/Quality/Production. Reason being, it becomes performance/load intensive when the perf. monitoring is on.
    Still, you can diagnose bottlenecks and execution trends in Dev/Quality using performance monitoring as suggested in the note but be aware that your box is coping well with it. Please note, once activated, you don't have to do anything else. System will automatically collect performance data and you will be able to browse through it using the performance monitoring link.
    How to use it???
    You see a performance monitoring link in Monitoring Home (navigate via Configuration and Monitoring home from PI/PO homepage).
    It will help you analyze the flow of message on periodical basis (hourly/daily etc) and will give you more stats on number of messages in that time duration, average time taken, message sizes (min, max and avg), interface-by-interface detail of runtime consumption at every stage etc.
    Please go through standard SAP help for more clarity:
    Monitoring Performance - Advanced Adapter Engine - SAP Library
    Apart from this, there is this great blog by Suseelan around monitoring:
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-35805
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Abhishek

  • Performance Problems - Adapter Engine

    Hi all,
    something strange is happening... In scenario Soap -> XI -> Abap proxy, sync, my legacy make a soap call to xi web service. The message sent arrives at sxmb_moni only 2,5 or 3 minutes after the legacy has send it. Sometimes does not appear at sxmb_moni because expires in adapter engine.
    After sending the message from legacy, I can see the message in runtime workbench imediately. There it remains as "request received", but no message at sxmb_moni. After 2 or 3 minutes appears a "call completed" on runtime workbench, and then it appears on sxmb_moni, goes to ecc, execute the query and returns.
    As basis team said, only 15% to 20%  of processor and memory resources are in use...
    Some of you have some tip about it?
    thanks!
    roberti

    Hi,
    Don't know how to see if the adapter engine is "loaded fully" as you said...
    But there are lots of memory and processor free.
    Yes, we have multiple adapters running in parallel, but this seems to be a normal scenario.
    Actually we found the interface that was causing this problem. It is a synchronous interface that run in 8 seconds. It has been used to load data from a legacy app to sap ecc, and the client program was executing 6 threads at same time calling this interface. If I stop this data load, all other interfaces works fast.
    I can't understand why this happens... We normally have 250 messages per minute from many different interfaces and all of them working fast. If we put 3 or 4 threads asking for this one, all other interfaces begins to be slow... and slower, and timed-out sometimes.
    regards.
    roberti

  • Need clear steps for doing performance tuning on SQL Server 2008 R2 (DB Engine, Reporting Services and Integration Services)

    We have to inverstigate about a reporting solution where things are getting slow (may be material, database design, network matters).
    I have red a lot in MSDN and some books about performance tuning on SQL Server 2008 R2 (or other) but frankly, I feel a little lost in all that stuff
    I'am looking for practical steps in order to do the tuning. Someone had like a recipe for that : a success story...
    My (brain storm) Methodology should follow these steps:
     Resource bottlenecks: CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks
     tempdb bottlenecks
     A slow-running user query : Missing indexes, statistics,...
     Use performance counters : there are many, can one give us the list of the most important
    how to do fine tuning about SQL Server configuration
    SSRS, SSIS configuration ? 
    And do the recommandations.
    Thanks
    "there is no Royal Road to Mathematics, in other words, that I have only a very small head and must live with it..."
    Edsger W. Dijkstra

    Hello,
    There is no clear defined step which can be categorized as step by step to performance tuning.Your first goal is to find out cause or drill down to factor causing slowness of SQL server it can be poorly written query ,missing indexes,outdated stats.RAM crunch
    CPU crunch so on and so forth.
    I generally refer to below doc for SQL server tuning
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd672789(v=sql.100).aspx
    For SSIS tuning i refer below doc.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library/Cc966529#ECAA
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms137622(v=sql.105).aspx
    When I face issue i generally look at wait stats ,wait stats give you idea about on what resource query was waiting.
    --By Jonathan KehayiasSELECT TOP 10
    wait_type ,
    max_wait_time_ms wait_time_ms ,
    signal_wait_time_ms ,
    wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms AS resource_wait_time_ms ,
    100.0 * wait_time_ms / SUM(wait_time_ms) OVER ( )
    AS percent_total_waits ,
    100.0 * signal_wait_time_ms / SUM(signal_wait_time_ms) OVER ( )
    AS percent_total_signal_waits ,
    100.0 * ( wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms )
    / SUM(wait_time_ms) OVER ( ) AS percent_total_resource_waits
    FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats
    WHERE wait_time_ms > 0 -- remove zero wait_time
    AND wait_type NOT IN -- filter out additional irrelevant waits
    ( 'SLEEP_TASK', 'BROKER_TASK_STOP', 'BROKER_TO_FLUSH',
    'SQLTRACE_BUFFER_FLUSH','CLR_AUTO_EVENT', 'CLR_MANUAL_EVENT',
    'LAZYWRITER_SLEEP', 'SLEEP_SYSTEMTASK', 'SLEEP_BPOOL_FLUSH',
    'BROKER_EVENTHANDLER', 'XE_DISPATCHER_WAIT', 'FT_IFTSHC_MUTEX',
    'CHECKPOINT_QUEUE', 'FT_IFTS_SCHEDULER_IDLE_WAIT',
    'BROKER_TRANSMITTER', 'FT_IFTSHC_MUTEX', 'KSOURCE_WAKEUP',
    'LAZYWRITER_SLEEP', 'LOGMGR_QUEUE', 'ONDEMAND_TASK_QUEUE',
    'REQUEST_FOR_DEADLOCK_SEARCH', 'XE_TIMER_EVENT', 'BAD_PAGE_PROCESS',
    'DBMIRROR_EVENTS_QUEUE', 'BROKER_RECEIVE_WAITFOR',
    'PREEMPTIVE_OS_GETPROCADDRESS', 'PREEMPTIVE_OS_AUTHENTICATIONOPS',
    'WAITFOR', 'DISPATCHER_QUEUE_SEMAPHORE', 'XE_DISPATCHER_JOIN',
    'RESOURCE_QUEUE' )
    ORDER BY wait_time_ms DESC
    use below link to analyze wait stats
    http://www.sqlskills.com/blogs/paul/wait-statistics-or-please-tell-me-where-it-hurts/
    HTH
    PS: for reporting services you can post in SSRS forum
    Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

  • Purpose of having central adapter engine

    What is the purpose of having Centeral Adapter Engine when any WAS 6.40 has an adapter engine that can communicate de-centrally with the IS?
    Regards
    chandrakanth.K

    Hi Chandra,
    The Adapter Engine is a separate software or software component  that is automatically installed on the Integration Server. In this case, we will call it as central Adapter Engine. You can also install the Adapter Engine separately on another host. This is then a non-central Adapter Engine.
                    By installing the adapter engine centrally on Integration Server, all the components like adapter engine, integration engine, mapping runtime etc will be at single place which increases the preformance.
               In the case of non central adapter engine, where we will install the adapter engine at another system(may be in another place) which decrease your total server performance.
    thanks,
    madhu

  • J2ee Adapter engine installation error

    Hi All,
    I am installing XI with NW07. I had an ERP2005 server here with ABAP only. I installed Java Add In to it with usage type PI.
    Now I tried to install J2ee adapter engine. It showed if i want to run a new installation or continue the old one.
    I tried to install installation of J2ee adapter engine from a new directory.
    It is stuck in between. I choose it as a MCOD to existing DB.
    I can see a new instance for this in MMC and it is up and running.
    But the old java instance is not running. None of the Proceses of Old Java instance (dispatcher, server0 and SDM) are not running. Did I do something wrong?
    My JVM_BOOTSTRAP.OUT says this:-
    Exception occurred:
    com.sap.engine.frame.core.configuration.NameNotFoundException: A configuration with the path "cluster_data/dispatcher/ID4065200" does not exist.
    at com.sap.engine.core.configuration.impl.ConfigurationDataCacheAllImpl.getSubConfiguration(ConfigurationDataCacheAllImpl.java:107)
    at com.sap.engine.core.configuration.impl.ReadAccessConfiguration.getSubConfiguration(ReadAccessConfiguration.java:715)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Synchronizer.getConfiguration(Synchronizer.java:426)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Synchronizer.getElementType(Synchronizer.java:72)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.initDatabaseConnection(Bootstrap.java:420)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.<init>(Bootstrap.java:144)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:814)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
    at com.sap.engine.offline.OfflineToolStart.main(OfflineToolStart.java:81)
    Exception occurred:
    com.sap.engine.bootstrap.SynchronizationException: Database initialization failed! Check database properties!
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.initDatabaseConnection(Bootstrap.java:422)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.<init>(Bootstrap.java:144)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:814)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
    at com.sap.engine.offline.OfflineToolStart.main(OfflineToolStart.java:81)
    == Caused by: ==----
    com.sap.engine.bootstrap.SynchronizationException: No such Dialog Instance (ID4065200) in the database! Check database consistency or local Bootstrap properties!
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Synchronizer.getElementType(Synchronizer.java:75)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.initDatabaseConnection(Bootstrap.java:420)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.<init>(Bootstrap.java:144)
    at com.sap.engine.bootstrap.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:814)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
    at com.sap.engine.offline.OfflineToolStart.main(OfflineToolStart.java:81)
    Bootstrap module> Problem occurred while performing synchronization.
    My dev_jcontrol.b00 shows:-
    JControlStartJLaunch: program = C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\exe\jlaunch.exe
    -> arg00 = C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\exe\jlaunch.exe
    -> arg01 = pf=C:\usr\sap\IDE\SYS\profile\IDE_DVEBMGS00_sapides
    -> arg02 = -DSAPINFO=IDE_00_bootstrap
    -> arg03 = -nodeId=-1
    -> arg04 = -file=C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\cluster\instance.properties
    -> arg05 = -syncSem=JSTARTUP_WAIT_ON_5284
    -> arg06 = -nodeName=bootstrap
    -> arg07 = -jvmOutFile=C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\work\jvm_bootstrap.out
    -> arg08 = -stdOutFile=C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\work\std_bootstrap.out
    -> arg09 = -locOutFile=C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\work\dev_bootstrap
    -> arg10 = -mode=BOOTSTRAP
    -> arg11 = pf=C:\usr\sap\IDE\SYS\profile\IDE_DVEBMGS00_sapides
    -> arg12 = -DSAPSTART=1
    -> arg13 = -DCONNECT_PORT=4740
    -> arg14 = -DSAPSYSTEM=00
    -> arg15 = -DSAPSYSTEMNAME=IDE
    -> arg16 = -DSAPMYNAME=sapides_IDE_00
    -> arg17 = -DSAPPROFILE=C:\usr\sap\IDE\SYS\profile\IDE_DVEBMGS00_sapides
    -> arg18 = -DFRFC_FALLBACK=ON
    -> arg19 = -DFRFC_FALLBACK_HOST=localhost
    -> lib path = PATH=C:\j2sdk1.4.2_09\jre\bin\server;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_09\jre\bin;F:\oracle\IDE\102\bin;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_06\bin;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_06\lib;C:\usr\sap\IDE\SYS\exe\uc\NTI386
    -> exe path = PATH=C:\j2sdk1.4.2_09\bin;C:\usr\sap\IDE\DVEBMGS00\j2ee\os_libs;F:\oracle\IDE\102\bin;C:\WINDOWS\system32;C:\WINDOWS;C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_06\bin;C:\j2sdk1.4.2_06\lib;C:\usr\sap\IDE\SYS\exe\uc\NTI386
    Thr 4232 Tue Sep 16 17:48:04 2008
    Thr 4232 *** ERROR => invalid return code of process bootstrap (exitcode = 66) http://jstartxx.c 1642
    Thr 4232 JControlExecuteBootstrap: error executing bootstrap node bootstrap (rc = 66)
    Thr 4232 JControlCloseProgram: started (exitcode = 66)
    Thr 4232 JControlCloseProgram: good bye... (exitcode = 66)
    My DEV_BOOTSTRAP.B00 shows:-
    Thr 5984 Tue Sep 16 17:48:02 2008
    Thr 5984 JHVM_RegisterNatives: registering methods in com.sap.bc.krn.perf.PerfTimes
    Thr 5608 Tue Sep 16 17:48:04 2008
    Thr 5608 JLaunchIExitJava: exit hook is called (rc = 66)
    Thr 5608 **********************************************************************
    u2022     
    o     
         ERROR => The Java VM terminated with a non-zero exit code.
         Please see SAP Note 943602 , section 'J2EE Engine exit codes'
         for additional information and trouble shooting.
    Thr 5608 JLaunchCloseProgram: good bye (exitcode = 66)
    I ran the prerequisite checks before starting the installation.
    It shows everything ok except it told me to have a environmental variable as CPIC_MAX_CONV with the value 200 at least. And I did that.
    All the other checks were ok.
    All are on SAME OS and same machine.
    I have J2EE Adapter Engine installation guide, but there is nothing for this in that
    In Instance properties file for the old instance it is showing the instance ID which it is not able to find.
    In the configtool of both the instances, the instance ID is same under cluster_data and this is of the newer instance
    How did the instance ID and data got replaced in the configtool of old instance. I mean the new instance has its new directory or folder.
    What Could be the problem?
    Did I do anything wrong here?
    Kindly help

    Hi,
    Check out the SNote 997510, " Note 997510 - Troubleshooting
    J2EE Engine 6.40/7.0 Bootstrap Issues ".
    I hope it will help you to drill more in to the problem
    Rgds
    Radhakrishna D S

  • Adapter engine field blank in File Comm channel (Sender)

    Hi,
    I am not getting any value in drop-down list of adapter engine in file adapter communication channel.System is allowing me to save the comm channel but when I am trying to create sender agreement, system is giving me following error
    <b>Unable to find an associated SLD element (source element: SAP_XIIntegrationDirectory, [CreationClassName, SAP_XIIntegrationDirectory, string, Name, directory.s01., string], target element type: SAP_XIIntegrationServer)</b>
    I m getting values of adapter engine when I select some other adpter like IDOC or RFC.
    Please help...

    Hi,
    1) Can you check your Post Installation.
    2) Look for SAP NOTES.
    3) Try cache refresh
       a)Start transaction SXI_CACHE.
       b)From the context menu XI Runtime Cache select Start Complete Cache Refresh.
    If you still face issue try this .
    Many actions require to access System Landscape Directory content from the Integration Builder. To optimize performance, this content is loaded into a cache so that the System Landscape Directory does not have to be accessed directly each time that System Landscape Directory content is required.
    However, this cache is not automatically updated if changes are made to the content of the System Landscape Directory. For this reason that we delete the System Landscape Directory cache if changes have been made to content in the System Landscape Directory. The cache is then filled each time that the System Landscape Directory is accessed. If we log on to the Integration Builder after we have made a change in the SLD, we do not need to delete the SLD cache.
    To clear the SLD cache, from the Integration Builder main menu, choose Environment ® Delete Cache for SLD Data.
    Once we have deleted the cache for SLD data, accessing objects in the SLD may take longer than usual initially.
    Regards
    Agasthuri Doss

  • Load balancing Central Advance Adapter Engine

    Hello All,
    I am trying to get more information on load balancing Central Advance Adapter Engine for SAP PI 7.1. How do I configure and load balance Advance Central Adapter Engine to handle more volume? Should I added extra non-central adapter engines to achieve this? If yes, How do I do this i.e. configuration etc? If not, then what is the best practice on load balancing the Central Advance Adapter Engine?
    Thank you for replying,
    Mayur

    Hi,
    I just post your Q&A here.
    Cheers,
    Aaron
    I have few follow up questions regarding your answers.
    1. For options 1 and 2, could you elaborate or point me some documentation on sap.help or somewhere else which talks more about these options?
       =========================================
       Basically you have more power with more processes (Instances or Server node) to process your messages in the Adapter Engine. That's the way to improve the system throughput.
       For more information, please refer to SAP PI tuning guide (I could not find the guide for 7.1, but the principle is still the same)
       https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000592892005E.PDF
      =========================================
    2. For option 3, add non central adapter engine and configure scenarios.
        1. So, do I have to run non-central adapters on separate servers?
       ====================
        Yes. It is recommended to run non-central adapter enging on separate server to minimize the reciprocal impact in terms of resource contention.
       ==============
        2. Do I need web dispatcher to do the load balancing between central and non-central adapter engine?
        ========
        No. this is also not possible since the below is true.
        =========
    I somehow think that if I am selecting the non-central adapter engine when creating the communication channel then it won't be "load balancing" because I will be sending a particular interface to the non-central engine at design time instead of runtime.
    Thank you for taking time and replying to my questions.

  • How to get Payload of SOAP Message in Advance Adapter Engine

    HI All,
    I am wondering if anybody can tell me how to view the Payload of SOAP Sender and Receiver Message in Advance Adapter Engine?
    Does Anybody know how to check mapping payload in Advance Adapter Engine because in ABAP you can see the mapping payload under Request Message Mapping but when you use AAE you can't see the Request Message Mapping Payload.
    I have a SOAP to RFC Scenario in which I can't see the SOAP Sender and RFC Receiver Mapping Payload.
    When I am sending incorrect data to an RFC I am getting this error which is very strange and new to me.
    com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Unable to split a synchronous message
    Any comments would be much appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Iqbal

    HI All,
    I have managed to find Michal's Blog which is talking about getting the mapping payload but unfortunately I don't know how to create Adapter Module so I am wondering if somebody can please provide me EAR file so that I will request the Basis guys to deploy the code and hopefully this will solve my query.
    Michal's Blog
    As you all probably know while using local Advanced Adapter Engine (AAE) processing in SAP PI 7.1 the message is logged only once (during processing by sender adapter). This is great in terms of performance but what if we need to check the mapping output? Is there a way do do it somehow? It turns out that we don't have such an option in standard yet. Is there any alternative then?
    It turns out there is - a simplest adapter module there is...
    Local AAE works in such a way that from the sender adapter it executes the receiver adapter so in the outbound message to PI processing you can see the adapter info logs of the receiver adapter and this is what we can use. The idea is to add an adapter module to the receiver adapter which will put the content of the message into the audit log of PI message processing. We can do it by writing a few lines of code:
    PI/XI: target message logging with local AAE not possible ? not anymore...
    *Please upload the file in any free site or <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
    <READ RULES OF ENGAGEMENT>
    Thanks,
    Edited by: Prateek Raj Srivastava on Jan 6, 2012 9:10 PM

  • PI 7.1/RWB/Component/Monitoring/Adapter Engine/Test Message/403 Forbidden

    Hello guys!
    During performing PI 7.1 Readiness Check I have to perform a test message under Runtime Workbench\Adapter Engine\Test Message.
    After processing i receive following error:
    Error while sending message: 403 Forbidden.
    Does anybody know the cause?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Jochen

    Hi Sreeni!
    Direct hit!
    This was the problem! Missing role!
    Many thanks to you!
    Additional Information for all:
    Readiness Check (PDF)
    A compilaton of simple and advanced checks for Process Integration 7.1 (PI 7.1)
    Page 44
    SAP Note 817920 - XI Readiness Check 3.0/7.0, 7.1
    Regards,
    Jochen

Maybe you are looking for