Adding new Product to derivation rule values

Hi Everyone,
Client wants to add new product to existing derivation rule, please advise how to go.
Please find the below
I checked the derivation rules for Edurant (TMC 278) which is a new product, and I can´t find it in derivation rule 32 in transaction code KEDE. I can´t put the rule in since I don´t know what it should be. Can you please do it?

Hello paulap2000,
As far as I know you should be able to register multiple products under the same email address without any issues, however there may be some conflict.
If you have not already done so I would report the issue you are experiencing through this link
HP Registration Feedback to the Webmaster
This will get your issue to the appropriate team that handles registration issues.
If I have helped you in any way click the Kudos button to say Thanks.
The community works together, click Accept as Solution on the post that solves your issue for other members of the community to benefit from the solution.
- Friendship is magical.

Similar Messages

  • DERIVATION RULE VALUE TRANSPORTING

    Hi,
    Is it possible to transport the values of a particular derivation rule from one server to another? currently derivation rules are updated in "PRD" and we have created a copy of PRD with some changes now we would like to transport the rule values maintained in old PRD to its new copy.. is it possib to do so. if yes then what are the steps involved?
    Regards,

    Hi Faizan,
    Please check these SAP notes:
    1661776 - How to transport Derivation Strategy – Best Practice
    1231815 - Predefined FMDERIVE tables are renamed during  transport/CC
    1019327 - FMDERIVE and the new FINBASIS transportation tool
    Regards
    Javed

  • KEDR - Testing Newly added Cost Element to Derivation Rule

    Hi There -
    Background: We have Column in COPA KE30 report - 3BOXID. This field is updated with Blank and the reason we found is cost element is missing in dervation rule and we added the respective cost element to Derivation Rule
    Can you please help me in testing this
    Thanks
    Sri

    Hi,
      Basically i understand that you wish to have HR posting to COPA
      Please take a look at attached note 130344.
      Basically according to the note there are 2 options:
    1. The update of data from the Payroll in Controlling should be carried out in the standard system to the cost center. The actual commissions posted to cost center can then be posted to Profitability Analysis by assessment.
    2. If you assign the relevant account via the automatic account assignment in transaction OKB9 to profitability segment a costing-based CO-PA document should be created for the postings of transaction PCP0. The profitability segment determined should only be filled rather scarcely though as not much information is available in this case.
    regards
    Waman

  • Derivation Rule Problem After A Client Copy

    Hello,
    Has anyone ever encountered a problem with derivation rules after a client copy is performed? After a client copy, we have "some" FM and GM derivation rules (not all of them) that have to be manually copied from the source to the target client (line by line by line by line). I'm thinking that there has to be a way to prevent this since some rules are fine after the clent copy. Your input would be greatly appreciated.
    Will

    I believe that we have resoved our issue. For the derivation rule values that would never copy, we re-created these again starting in DEV and transported the derivation rules throughout the entire landscape (QAS and PRD). Evidently some derivation rules (and the related values stored in the tables) were created directly in Production. During a client copy the values in the tables for the derivation rules that were created directly in our Production environment would not copy to our QAS environment. Those rules were stored in a table named FMFMOAPRD1000122. Note that PRD is in the table name. After re-creating the rule and transporting it through the landscape, the table was named FMFMOADEV1000152 (for example).

  • LSMW for creating Derivation Rules in COPA

    Hi Experts,
    Is it possible to create a LSMW for COPA - Derivation Rules. When I am trying to select Default All tab to update the field name, the system is not permitting me to default the filed names.
    Phani

    Hi Phani ,
    I think your concern is about updating dervation rule values not derivation rule .
    You can cut paste 20 rule values at a time .. so use cut paste .. from excel.. Updating 1000 values will not take more than 20 mins ..
    I have never used LSMW for Derivation rule values.. as from excel you can easily cut paste and do it within 30 mins.
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Add new product to already existing PPR ID through BAPI_PPR_MAINTAIN_40

    Hi,
    My requirement is to add new product to already existing PPR ID through the BAPI BAPI_PPR_MAINTAIN_40 but it is not working.
    Normally at the time of creation we pass HANDLE and REF_HANDLE.
    As in this case PPR ID already exist but adding new product, I am passing HANDLE and REF_GUID in place of REF_HANDLE.
    INPUT_FIELDS also I am passing REF_GUID but it is not working.
    Can anybody throw a light how this can be achieved to add new product through this BAPI?
    It really helps.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Joao,
    Were you able to succeed in creating PPR programatically?
    Please share your solution. Even I am unable to maintain input fields tab.

  • Maintaining operating concern after adding new value field

    Hello,
    I added a new value field to our live operating concern,maintained the data structure throguh KEA0(Maintain operating concern).The changes are transported from Development to Quality,Changes were reflected in Q system.After testing in Q system transports were pushed to production system.The new value field is added to the operating concern. When i check the log for KEA0 in production system it displayed one message like:
    Field VV088 was added to the reference structure
    Message no. KE782.You probably either  changed the operating concern or SAP-EIS aspect, and added the field VV099 to the definition.
    The added a CO-PA value field:
    In this case, the field is added to the definition or the summarization levels. This invalidates all existing levels. Consequently, you need to activate them again and fill them with data.
    In production system maintaining operating concenr or KEAO is only in display mode.Is it needed to regenerate the operating concern once again in production, how to do it. Is the message talking about the KEDV summarization levels.?
    thanks
    rahul

    Hi,
    No no ....KEDV is nothing to do here....that is creation of summarization in CO-PA.
    Since you added new value field you necessarily have to Regenerate the operating concern...
    Use Tcode KEA0...go to Environment tab...there the status of Cross client part  and client specific part both will be in RED....now just click on the Cross client (candle button)...now the system would regenerate the operating concern...once it is over do the same for the client specific...
    Beware when you do regenerate the operating concern no body can enter any transaction in that server since it is cross client table ...hence better do it after business hours.
    Hope this helps!
    Running KEDU with rebuild is relevant only when you already have created summarization and called up the same in the CO-PA report "options" tab. If you did not created the summarization you are nothing to do with KEDU.
    Next: The new value field has to be transported to PRD and hence even in PRD we have to do the regeneration manually.
    Regards,
    Velumani
    Message was edited by: Velumani Arunachalam
    Message was edited by: Velumani Arunachalam

  • Adding new column to production database

    I have to add a new timestamp column, that defaults to the current date/time, to an existing production database. The table is large - 150M records. I am trying to understand the ramifications of adding a new column to a table this large that gets hit often, mostly with inserts and reads. The column does allow null values and I am not going back and populating existing records with a value. Basically, I am looking for some best practice guidelines - how to prepare, what to expect, what other processes should be followed along with this schema update.

    Radiators wrote:
    Thanks, I have not found any %TYPE or %ROWTYPE dependencies on the table I am altering. But at the same time I do not understand how these types of dependencies would invalidate packages. I wouldn't be breaking any %TYPE dependency because I am not dropping columns, only adding a new one. And according to documentation for %ROWTYPE - "If columns are later added to or dropped from the table, your code can keep working without changes." Can you point me to Oracle documentation that describes your concern in detail? Thanks.you can test it yourself
    SQL> CREATE TABLE abc (c1 NUMBER);
    Table created.
    SQL> INSERT INTO abc
      2       VALUES (99);
    1 row created.
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test_proc
      2  AS
      3     v   abc%ROWTYPE;
      4  BEGIN
      5     SELECT c1
      6       INTO v
      7       FROM abc
      8       WHERE ROWNUM = 1;
      9  END;
    10  /
    Procedure created.
    SQL> SELECT object_name, status
      2    FROM user_objects
      3   WHERE object_name = 'TEST_PROC';
    OBJECT_NAME                STATUS
    TEST_PROC                    VALID
    SQL> ALTER TABLE abc ADD (c2 VARCHAR2(10));
    Table altered.
    SQL> SELECT object_name, status
      2    FROM user_objects
      3   WHERE object_name = 'TEST_PROC';
    OBJECT_NAME                 STATUS
    TEST_PROC                     INVALID
    SQL> you should also consider the chance that some where if people are using "select * into" using this table, which will fail since you added new column. i don't see any unusual performance bottlenecks by adding a new column. in case of the backups, yes the earlier backups will not have the column. if you restore it, you will see earlier table structure itself. i have one specific question. why are you not attempting this in development/test environment first? even if it is a simple insert, it's always important to do it in test environments before attempting on production db. one thing for sure i know is, after adding column, you will have to recompile all the invalid dependencies. i think, it's better if you attempt it in test db and come up with any issues you see rather than asking a general question where problematic scenarios are plenty and rarely unknown before hand.

  • Derivation rule for Product from Material Group

    Dear All,
    Is it possible derive product from Material Group. The scenario is as below.
    We executed KE30 report (Classic Drill down) for Product, the we are able to see the profitability for different products, when we click on the list button (Find button) againist the product at the bottom we found not assigned, we selected that and we found there are some un assigned amounts (without product). when we see the line items for the same the line items are coming with out product ( product field is emply)
    Another observation is we created profitability assessment cycle (KEU5) in which cost center is the sender and material group is the receiver. when we run this cycle system is not distibuting the costs to the products, in the sender and receiver its executed with zero values.
    In derivation rule KEDR we gave the logic to derive product from material group.
    please guide the way which we are following is correct or not. can we derive product from material group.
    Thanks,
    Siva Reddy.S

    Hi
    Yes you can derive using "Derivation" method in KEDR and maintain a mapping of Mat Grp to Product... But that is not the right way
    You need to find out why some lines are posted w/o products.. They can be genuine cases....
    Also for assessment, either specify the Product as receiver or run KE28 Top Down Dist in order to allocate values from Mat group to Products..... Deriving Product from Mat group does not seem to be the nice way
    br, Ajay M

  • How to define new derivation rules in FM module

    Can somebody help me define a new derivation rule which is user specific in FM module. I want to map muliple Fund Centers to a single Cost center and also map many commitment items to a single GL.
    Thanks
    shivaji

    You derive object X (fund centre) from object (Y) cost centre. In terms of logic, it's not possible to derive multiple values from single value. That's the concept of derivation. If you have cost centre (let's say ABCD), on what parameter will your logic decide whether to take fund centre XXXX or fund centre YYYY? As you understand, the FM posting should be done eventually on one fund centre as well as commitment item, fund, etc.
    After all, the computer could be told what ever you have to tell it; if you, yourself, can make this decision - which FCtr should be taken - upon certain logic, it could be programmed as well in FMDERIVE.

  • Adding new project mask  in Production Client

    Hi,
    I have requirement of adding new project mask code for Production client.
    As SAP standard functionality does not allow you to add any new project
    mask once you create a project .So if I try to add new mask system will not
    show me projects already created and released.Is there any solution to this
    problem?
    Ranjit

    Hi Ranjit,
    You did not specify exactly what type of new mask you are adding.  For example, maybe you simply need to modify an existing code.  You can make two changes to existing codes that have projects created.
    1.  You can extend the length of the mask to the complete 24 characters, if not already 24 characters.
    2.  You can change any 0 (numeric only) character in the mask to an X (allows alphanumeric).
    The best means to see what project codes are already in use, you should run SE16 for table PROJ and PRPS.  You want to view the fields in PROJ-PSPNR and/or PROJ-PSPID as well as PRPS-PSPNR and PRPS-POSID.  So, any project code beginning values (A, B, C, etc; 1, 2, 3, etc) displayed cannot be setup as new project codes.
    Yes, you could delete the old project codes after archiving the structures, but you also have to (or should) archive any associated financial documents.  As the previous responder stated, this is not a trivial task.
    Points appreciated....
    Regards,
    Kent Bettisworth

  • Performance issue: Adding a new product line to existing Quote calls pricing engine for existing line a well

    Hi All,
    I need some assistance for my below query...
    If there are already existing some product/quote lines on the quote and then we try to add another new product/quote line to this quote , then  it is taking more time to add the product. As per my understanding it is calling the Pricing engine for the existing line as well. How can we avoid the pricing engine call for the existing lines.
    There are some parameters which we are setting as mentioned below :
    l_control_rec.header_pricing_event := 'BATCH' -- What does this mean when we set to batch
    l_control_rec.price_mode := 'ENTIRE_QUOTE'; -- (possible values could be CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE)
    l_header_rec.pricing_status_indicator := 'C';
    l_control_rec.calculate_freight_charge_flag := 'Y';
    l_control_rec.calculate_tax_flag := 'Y';
    l_header_rec.tax_status_indicator := 'C';
    Question :Could someone please help us with this whether is there any way with these parameters could be altered or changed to some other value ( like for PRICE_MODE we see this parameter could have some other values like : CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE etc other than ENTIRE_QUOTE).
    means lets say we do the Pricing Engine call only for the Newly Added quote line but not do it for the Entire Quote again and again..
    Now the other question here could be how do we finally synch the line level price values for all the quote lines upto the Quote header level in form of Totals (TOTAL_LIST_PRICE,TOTAL_TAX, TOTAL_SHIPPING_CHARGE, SURCHARGE, TOTAL_QUOTE_PRICE in aso_quote_headers_all table) ??
    Also is there a way that we don't do the Freight Charge calculation and Tax calculation (means we skip this completely) while adding products to the quote but do it at a later point when doing the Submit to Order functionality.
    Could someone please help with these pricing related parameters and modes to be used in order to get around this performance issue
    Thanks
    Mithun

    Dear Expert,
    Activate your Controlling area as usual and Cost Centers and Profit Center , You can assign an internal order for the particular product line for what you are seeing and can collect the costs of that particular product line exclusively.
    Regards,
    Shankar K B

  • Performance issue adding a new product line to existing Quote pricing issue

    Hi All,
    Morning , need some assistance with this as we are currently stuck with this...
    Using the Seeded API call mentioned here : aso_quote_pub.update_quote we are trying to add a new product/item lines to an existing quote in Sales Online Module but it is taking lot of time ( means performance issue is there ).
    Also if there are already existing some product/quote lines on the quote and then we try to add another new product/quote line to this quote , then also it more and more of the time..
    There are some parameters which we are setting as mentioned below :
    l_control_rec.header_pricing_event := 'BATCH' -- What does this mean when we set to batch
    l_control_rec.price_mode := 'ENTIRE_QUOTE'; -- (possible values could be CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE)
    l_header_rec.pricing_status_indicator := 'C';
    l_control_rec.calculate_freight_charge_flag := 'Y';
    l_control_rec.calculate_tax_flag := 'Y';
    l_header_rec.tax_status_indicator := 'C';
    Question :Could someone please help us with this whether it there any way these parameters could be altered or changed to some other value ( like for PRICE_MODE we see this parameter could have some other values like : CHANGE_LINES , QUOTE_LINE etc other than ENTIRE_QUOTE).
    means lets say we do the Pricing Engine call only for the Newly Added quote line but not do it for the Entire Quote again and again..
    Question : Now the other question here could be how do we finally synch the line level price values for all the quote lines upto the Quote header level in form of Totals (TOTAL_LIST_PRICE,TOTAL_TAX, TOTAL_SHIPPING_CHARGE, SURCHARGE, TOTAL_QUOTE_PRICE in aso_quote_headers_all table) ??
    2.Also is there a way that we don't do the Freight Charge calculation and Tax calculation (means we skip this completely) while adding products to the quote but do it at a later point when doing the Submit to Order functionality.
    Could someone please help with these pricing related parameters and modes to be used in order to get around this performance issue
    Thanks

    Dear Expert,
    Activate your Controlling area as usual and Cost Centers and Profit Center , You can assign an internal order for the particular product line for what you are seeing and can collect the costs of that particular product line exclusively.
    Regards,
    Shankar K B

  • How to copy copa derivation rules ( maintain rule value)

    Hi All,
    Can anyone help how to copy the copa derivation rules with maintain rule value from production to quality.

    Hello,
    Export and import of copa derivation rule is not possible.
    usually Transports are moved from quality to production as per best policy.
    Production to quality happens at the time of quality refresh.
    in case of high importance please get in touch with Basis team.
    Regards
    Lavanya

  • Impact of adding new value fields in ongoing operating concern.

    Hi All,
    Want to know the steps of adding new value fields in the existing operating concern in COPA?
    What is the overall impact of addition of New Value fields in the running Operating Concern?
    How do we test the addition of new value fields?
    Is the addition of New Value fields to the running Operating Concern advisable?
    Your support and advice is highly anticipated and appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    9819528669

    HI,
    please search in SCN forum before you post:
    Re: Adding a ValueField to an existing Operating Concern?
    Best regards, Christian

Maybe you are looking for