Adding wipe effect

Dear All,
i hav a component which i am dispaying using PopUpManger.addpoppup(myComponent).
I hav to display this popup using some effect eg. WipeRight effect.
I hav tried to apply this effect but not giving me any effect, its opening instantly without any effect.
Pls help
Regards,
kapil Arora

maybe this can help you?
http://blog.flexexamples.com/2007/10/11/changing-the-default-easing-function-on-a-wipe-eff ect/
it sounds like you need to modify your duration and easing function(s)?

Similar Messages

[svn:fx-trunk] 10960: Fixed performance of Wipe effect.

Revision: 10960
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-09 13:55:47 -0700 (Fri, 09 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
Fixed performance of Wipe effect. It turns out that micro-tuning the shader code is very important, since that same inner loop runs on every pixel of the bitmap being affected. This change splits the single Wipe shader (with a direction parameter) into four separate Wipe shaders (WipeLeft, etc.), to avoid a switch on the direction parameter. Also, it avoids some setup of pixel values, only bothering to sample the pixel values after it determines which image to sample from. Little stuff, but gained about 20-25% performance on some sample wipe effects.
QE notes: This broke 3 Wipe effects tests because the old WipeEffectInstance class went away. These tests have supposedly been updated by the time this checkin is happening.
Doc notes: No
Bugs: sdk-23279
Reviewer: Corey
Tests run: checkintests, mustella spark/effects
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-23279
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Wipe.as
Added Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeDown.pbj
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeDown.pbk
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeLeft.pbj
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeLeft.pbk
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeRight.pbj
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeRight.pbk
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeUp.pbj
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/WipeUp.pbk
Removed Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Wipe.pbj
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/Wipe.pbk
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/effects/supportClasses/WipeInstance.as

Using Fade effect along with Wipe effect

Hi,
I have a requirement where a ViewStack has 4 VBoxes that should appear/disappear with Wipe + fade effect.
Now I have added standard wipe effect in my mxml and added the same in VBox's show and hide attributes.
But how do I add fade effect with it?
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
Amey

Use <parallel around the effects..
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/mx/effects/Parallel.htm l#includeExamplesSummary
*example at the very bottom of the page.

How do you change the direction of a Tween Wipe effect

Hi all,
Completely new to the forums and I hopefully my query is straight forward. How do you change the direction in the pre-built tween effects available within Flash CS3 (primarily the Wipe effect). Example code:
var Animate_Box:Tween = new Tween(Box, "height", Strong.easeInOut, 0, 200, 1, true);
OR
var Animate_Box_2:Object = {type:Wipe, direction:Transition.IN, duration:1, easing:Strong.easeInOut};
TransitionManager.start(Box_2, Animate_Box_2);
Many thanks in advance.
Kam
ANSWERED:
Sorry for posting something so pointless!
You simply add 'startPoint:5' onto the end i.e.
var Animate_Box_2:Object = {type:Wipe, direction:Transition.IN, duration:1, easing:Strong.easeInOut, startPoint:5'};
TransitionManager.start(Box_2, Animate_Box_2);
startPoint:5' = can be any number depending on the direction of the Wipe you want.
Thanks,
Kam

What you really want is a way of automatically mirroring the the X and/or Y coordinates of the keyframes within the effect. This ability would be very useful.
But right now there's no way to do that. You'd have to do it manually. That effect actually uses the Slide parameter to generate the movement (instead of a discreet X/Y coordinate for the position.) Changing the first keyframe value of the Slide parameter to a negative number still doesn't give the effect I think you're looking for.
So, it's probably easier to just rebuild the effect the way you want it from scratch.
Bony

Example of Spark Wipe effect?

Does anyone have an example of using the new Wipe effect outside the context of a transition?
Thanks,
David

And here's an update of your example with the non-transition usage. It can be done. However, it helps to match the size of the target and the bitmap you are going from etc. You avoid some of that awkwardness in your example by binding your rect size to the size of the bitmap. Anyhow, hope this helps a bit more. The animateShader classes are very powerful once you understand their usages:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application
 xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
 xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
 xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/halo" >
 <fx:Script>
 <![CDATA[
 import spark.effects.WipeDirection;
 [Embed(source='asset/blue.png')]
 public var blueImage:Class;
 public var blueBitmap:Bitmap = new blueImage();
 ]]>
 </fx:Script>
 <fx:Declarations>
 <s:Wipe id="wipeIn"
 target="{wipeGraphic}"
 direction="{WipeDirection.RIGHT}"
 bitmapFrom="{blueBitmap.bitmapData}"/>
 </fx:Declarations>
 <s:Group id="g1"
 x="143" y="89">
 <s:Rect id="wipeGraphic"
 width="{blueBitmap.width}" height="{blueBitmap.height}">
 <s:fill>
 <mx:SolidColor color="#EEEEEE"/>
 </s:fill>
 </s:Rect>
 </s:Group>
 <s:Button x="140" y="338"
 label="Play Effect"
 click="wipeIn.play()"/>
</s:Application>

Why is a layer blending mode result altered by adding and effect?

I've done a search online and haven't come up with an answer but does anyone
know why a layers blending mode result is altered by adding an effect?
I am using CS3 on a PC (Windows XP SP2) and have two layers; one a Tiff and
a second a text layer with an ambient light and a spot shining on them. Both
layers have 3D turned on and accept lights and are in the same position in
space.
To make the text, which is coloured black, sit better I changed the layers
blend mode to soft light which works well.
I wanted to soften the edge of the text a little so I added a Fast Blur
effect and suddenly the result of the blend was completely different. If I
turn off the effect it goes back to what it was before but even if the Fast
Blur is set to zero, ie no blur on the layer, the blend result is altered.
Does anyone know what's going on?

Many thanks for that. I tried the Box Blur but it too shifted the result of the blend. In the end, to get this job out of the door, I changed the colour of the text to orange, lowered the opacity and used Multiply as the layer blend mode. Adding the Fast Blur effect to this didn't shift the result of the blend mode. It's not as sexy a look as using Soft Light but it works. I wonder if it's something going on with the maths or this a real bug? <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected].. > Presumably a bug that uses the blur's convolution kernel when it > shoulddn't. Please report at <a href=http://www.adobe.com/go/wish>. Still, > sometimes changing the blend behavior is inevitable. Even if the layers > visually look the same, the actual pixel values may change and thus create > a different result in the blend formulas. That should not be the case > here, though. Replace the Fast Blur with Box Blur set to 8 or 9 iterations > and the result should look the same, but without the blending problem, I > guess. > > Mylenium

Transparency issue within linear wipe effect

Hello,
my client wishes some special linear wipe transitions for his new image movie. Due to the fact, that the transition should have a specified angle i used the "linear wipe" effect to make some presets.
To get a smooth transition i tried to use the feathered edge option. As soon as i choose a value above 9 pixels, the whole layer gets a little bit transparent (approximately 5%) and you can see all video tracks underneath the clip.
I have no idea how to solve this problem. First, i thought that this issue occures only in the preview monitor, but you can see the slight transparency even in the final render. I am surprised that the "linear wipe" effect works perfectly within After Effects, even it is the same plugin file (.aex).
So i tried to import the whole premiere project file into after effects. unfortunately without success.
My current version of Premiere is "Adobe Premiere Pro CC v7.2.2"
Thanks for any support.
Feathered Edge: 9px
Feathered Edge: 10px

Hi BB,
Sorry you did not get a response here. Did you ever resolve this issue? There is another user on the Red User forum experiencing the same issue. Here's a link: Linear wipe transparency Bug
Any details on your system and media would be most helpful in trying to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Kevin

How to remove or change wipe effect in MenuBar?

Does anyone know how to remove or change the default wipe
effect in Flex 3's MenuBar? I've seen several mentions online about
an openDuration property in the Menu class, but not in MenuBar. I
would greatly prefer to have either no effect or just a very brief
fade.
A solution in either MXML or ActionScript would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks very much!
Mike Laurence

We had an old version of Dreamweaver (DW-MX) in which I have found the layer. It apears to be an image made in Photoshop.
The way I solved the problem now is that I deleted the layer in DW-MX and made a new background image. I am no pro, just an amateur
Anyway, thank you very much for your fast reply and the offer to help me out this problem.

How to create the Over exposure wipe effect?

Films like The Secret produce a wipe effect of over exposed light emiting from the video as it transitions to the next shot. Any idea how to creat this effect?
Thx
Kevin

It can definitely play a factor. DVD has a little more leeway, and I've never seen an issue on my TV, but it's properly set up. For the typical viewer who probably has their brightness turned way up so they can watch TV in the afternoon with the sun shining right on the screen, the transitions will probably tear and distort.
I love the vapor across transition, but only use it for web based projects, and things I know that only I am going to be watching.

Noise after adding visual effects or tranisition

Hi there!
I recently edited a movie with iMovie. After adding some effects or transitions I noticed a strange noise (some kind of crackling).
Here are my questions:
How can I restore the original clips? I saved and closed that project before I noticed that crackling.
How can I avoid that noise when adding effects or transitions?
Thanks for your help!

Hello,
After adding some effects or transitions I noticed a strange noise (some kind of crackling). How can I avoid that noise when adding effects or transitions?
Unfotunately, that is a known problem with iMovie sometimes. See this:http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107945
How can I restore the original clips?
Remove any transitions on either side of the clip you wish to restore. Click on the clip. Under 'Advanced' you should see the option to 'restore original clip.' Just select that and the entire clip from which that part came will replace it.

Looking for adding machine effect seen in "Supersize Me"

Does anyone know if you can do the following effect in Motion 3:
I'm trying to do an adding machine effect where you see figures change like you would on altimeter of an aircraft or an adding machine. I saw this effect in Morton Spurlock's "Supersize Me".
There must be some Motion 3 behavior or plug-in that can do this.
Thanks very much in advance,
- Nicholas

altimeter of an aircraft or an adding machine< </div>
Altimeters are usually analog dials. Adding machine would be an analog paper tape.
There are many cool gauge objects in Motion 3 and designing a paper tape simulation could be fun.
No idea how you would create a behavior to run the displays, though. (Easy in After Effects with an expressions control)
bogiesan

Why am I getting a delay on one of my tracks when I have added no effects?

Why am I getting a delay on one of my tracks when I have added no effects? It sounds like a latency problem.

AVI should never be used for iDVD. Even Microsoft abandoned AVI and moved to WMV. The reason for this is that AVI is limited to 2 GB is file size and has limited video codec support. If you have problems with AVI in iDVD, convert it to Quicktime right away.

Adding an effect to a portion of an audio file?

Hello,
For years now I've been using FCP and when STP was first released it seemed wonderful, but very convoluted, so I ended up doing all my audio mixing within FCP.
Recently I've decided to really nail STP and get it incorporated into my workflow, but the old frustrations have appeared immediately, which is why I never continued using it originally.
One problem I'm encountering is this:
I have a recording of a band, which when I open in STP appears on one long timeline. I've added markers where the songs stop/start etc, and deleted bits between the songs. When I save this file I can open it in a project file.
I then use 'S' to split the main track, chopping up the songs and placing them in their own tracks.
My confusion arises when I want to add a touch of reverb to one song.
If i highlight one song on a track, and go to Process>Effects>Reverb/Delay, non of the options are selectable, so I double-click the audio clip/waveform on a track and it opens in the audio timeline (no separate tracks, just 2 large waveforms Left&Right), here I can apply the reverb to the audio file, but it applies the effect to the whole audio file (1 hour long) not the individual song I want.
So... I can drag the playhead to make a selection with the master audio file, ie, select the individual song, and apply the reverb.
Is this the correct workflow? It seems like quite a convoluted process just to add a touch of reverb to one song on my master timeline with all the different tracks.

You shouldn't apply the process to the file, because as you've discovered it will affect all of the other regions of the file in your project.
Either add a reverb to each individual track in the mixer, or better yet to save on resources Add a Bus. On the Bus insert a Reverb. Now on any of the audio tracks you can Add a Send. By adjusting the level of the send of the signal from any channel to the Bus with the reverb you can add as much or as little as you like to each individual track.
!http://www.rdiv.com/screenshots/STP_reverbSetup.jpg!

Adding one effect to all clips in project

I Just need to know how to add the unsharp mask to every clip In my project at once.

EFfects are added to layers in the comp, not clips in the project window. Unless you already have them all in a comp and could use this comp as a layer in another comp, you will have to apply the effect individually with whatever means you deem best Like saving a preset and applying it or usi gcopy&paste.
Mylenium

How to stop and start a wipe effect at a specific place?

I assume I use the xFrom, yFrom, xTo, and yTo properties. But
I'm not
sure I understand how to use them to stop a wipe left effect
at 20% the
width of the container and start the subsequent wipe right
effect at the
same 20% position.

Breakpoints, whether normal or conditional, are just meant for debugging of your code. I had the sense from your question that the pausing you want to do is a part of normal operation of your code. I would NOT recommend using a breakpoint for that situation. It would bring up the block diagram showing the breakpoint when it occurs. A user besides the programmer would not know what to do in that case.
Yes, both the inner and outer loops would have shift registers.
Putting a case structure with a small while loop inside the "Pausing Case" is doable. It just depends on what you are doing or waiting for while the program operation is "paused".

Adding wipe effect

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for