Additional cost in invoice

Hello Experts,
Greetings,
My issue is that while creating the invoice through transaction code MIR7,it does not consider the additional cost which was entered in purchase order.
Please advice what could be the problem or how to do this to get those additional cost in SAP?
Best Rgds
Nitin

Hello Sir,
Thanks for the reply.It shows the line items for additional cost now in invoice.But while saving the document it asks for "Enter G/L ACCOUNT".Can you please tell me where we have to enter the g/l code?
One more thing I would like to know is that the additional cost we have entered manually in line items,Will it has to be copied from PO or user has enter it manually always.
Please do let me know.
Thanks
Nitin

Similar Messages

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Thomas,
I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
All the best.
Thanks
PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

Issue-How to book costs-Vendor Invoice

Hi,
I have got following scenario.
I got several POs raised for procuring goods from a vendor.
The vendor send the shipment combining these PO.
The goods are cleared by local agents(vendors) and they also charge for clearing the goods.
All these costs needs to be added on to the materials in PO so before actual GR,POs needs to be modified to incorporate those freight or clearing costs as conditions.
Once that is done then the GR is done & subsequently Invoicing is done.
While conditions were added the appropriate vendor is selected in the condition so that it will be different than the original goods supplier.
Now the problem which we face is that sometimes we receive partial shipment for the PO.
So we can book the additional costs only once while booking an invoice.
Take an example:
I have a PO with 100 line items.
I receive the shipment & local vendors clear the goods & while doing that I incurr say 100 USD cost.
This 100 USD cost comprises of 3types of different conditions defined like freight clearing,Demmurage cost,Others cost.
So before doing GR in system user adds these conditions as header conditions so that it gets apportioned on all items & subsequently upon GR it also gets loaded on to material.
Now assume that out of this PO, I have yet to receive delivery for 20 items.
So when these 20 items actually arrives on a later date, the local agents again clear those goods.
But since we are referrring to the same PO we can not add these 3 conditions again in the PO.
Now if we have to book an vendor invoice for that and at the same time I want thos costs to be added on all the materials how can I do that while doing MIRO.
If I happen to add them as unplanned delivery cost then I will have to manually split the cost on to each item depending upon the value of each line item which is practically a very difficult & painstaking task.
Is there any way by which we can improve upon this.So far we have not find any solution on this.
Request to suggest a better suggestion if any one has.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
BM

a

Additional Costs on a Purchase Order

Hi Guys,
I wonder if anyone can help with this. We have a scenario where we are buying product from one supplier at a certain price and then paying an amount to another supplier for the use of their logo on this product. The scenario is a little like delivery costs in that we would receive an invoice for the additional costs which we would then want to post against the PO in order to influence the MAP for the product. For example, we may buy @ £10 each and pay £1 each for the right to use the logo. What is the best way of implementing this requirement?

Hi,
If you have one price condition for freight costs, for example, just go to the IMG activity and create another one by copy.
On the PO, add that same new price condition, and on the loupe enter the price condition and change the vendor.
Then, on the incoming invoice, choose 3 - Goods receipt + planned costs, and Layout - 7_6310 All information.
Cheers.

Loading of additional costs on to inventory

Hi All,
How do load additional costs (freight, insurance, import taxes etc) on to inventory. The invoices for the above services will be received only in the month end. By this time raw material might have been already received and the basic invoice (commercial invoice) already booked. Additional cost that I book in the month end should pro rata increase the inventory values of the received lots so that my contribution figures are accurate.
How do I do this? Any document available?
thanks

You need the Periodic Costing, this is addressed in the Cost Management User Guide, There is also a Good white paper in Metalink in the Top Tech Doc under Cost Management section. This white paper explains with examples how to use this type of costing and how to integrate all the additional charges into your ost.

MIRO - additional costs - 2 acc. docs with different dates

Dear SAP Experts!
I have the following issue.
Case description:
On March 19 2008 my Customer entered additional costs in MIRO for material A. The document Invoice date and Posting date (as well as BaselineDt) on the header were entered as 29.02.2008
The way the additional costs were entered without purchase order reference, directly to Material Account using Material Tab.
The additional cost was entered for the ammount of material that was at that (29.02) moment on stock. (however there were some movements - sales and returns between 29.02 and 19.03)
The issue is - 2 accounting documents were created:
- one conatining postings to Vendor, Tax and Material accounts - with Invoice date and Posting date as entered in MIRO - both 29.02.2008
- second containing postin to Stock Account - Cr & Price Difference account - Db. however the dates that appear are Document date - 29.02.2008, Posting date 01.03.2008
So the first document goes to Period 2 and the second to Period 3.
Cutomer asks me for explanation.
The questions are:
1. Is this the way standard system works?
2. Why 2 accounting documents were created?
3. Why they were created with different Posting dates?
4. Why there were any postings done on Price Differences account if the additional costs were posted to the ammount that was on stock at the time?
5. Even if there is a logic that the date is different - why it was 01.03.2008 at this case not 10 or 19.03.2008 for example?
6. How does the system calculates the ammount that is posted to the Stock Difference accoun?
Thank you very much in advance for your advice!

Hi
1) PO quantity 100 unit. GR 40 unit and IR time also 40 unit.
This will post automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. The subsequent 60 unit in PO will be received in the next GR. is this process correct?
PO 100
GR 40
IR 40
Correct
2) PO quantity 40 unit. GR 100 and IR 100.
This will poat automatically during miro as GR/IR account value same for both GR and IR. User has to add additional line in PO for 60 units. is this process correct?
PO 40
GR 100
IR 100
You can the same line item of PO And invoice will get blocked.
3) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 50 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 50 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header less then total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 50
You can post the invoice for 50 units. System will accept it.
4) PO quantity 100 unit, GR 100 and IR 150 unit.
Somehow in vendor invoice hardcopy stated 150 units. Due to different in invoice quantity, the invoice amount also different.
In miro, we cannot change the quantity value in line item. Amount at header more than the total line item value.
GR/IR can be setoff completely as I do not change line item quantity. Correct?
May I know what should I do on the difference?
PO 100
GR 100
IR 150
Invoice get blocked
Thanks
Raman

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) do I have to pre-order online or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

If I wanted to exchange my iPhone 5 for the new iPhone 6 (no additional cost after $199 gift card from selling iPhone 5) can I pre-order online now or do I just have to show up at a Verizon store Sept 19th?

scodaddy, that is a wonderful question. We are super excited about the new iPhone. You can always pre-order your new iPhone online and then start the mail in rebate by following this link: http://bit.ly/GGnDDC Or you can always go into the store location and do it all in store on the 19th when the phone is launched. That would depend on if the store has them in stock when you go in. I hope that this was able to address your concern.
KevinR_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Use of template using CPT1 for charging an additional cost to the product

Hello,
I'm trying to charge an additional cost burden to the cost of my product for every base unit produced. (cost estimate)
I have created a template using transaction CPT1 with sender as Cost Center / Activity Type in environment 001
The activity type is measured in EA (Eaches) while we make our product in boxes (Product base unit of measure is 'Boxes') with say 20 Eaches going into a Box
I have maintained an activity price using transaction KP26 at say $0.55 per Each
I have assigned this template to my costing sheet , valuation area and overhead key using transaction KTPF
When I now cost the material for costing lot size of a 1000 boxes, it still charges the product with the activity price per Each ($0.55) instead of multiplying $0.55*20*1000 = $11,000 for a 1000 boxes
The formula I have chosen in the template against 'Plan quantity ' is in the attachment enclosed:
I need help with doing the right thing within the template to make it give a cost burden of $11000 for every 1000 boxes costed (costing lot size)

Didn't realize that you have to use transaction CPTD to charge template overhead to production orders. That's why it was not working. Now it is posting by reading the confirmed yield. But it is still not converting eaches to boxes using the conversion factor in the material master.
The formula I'm currently using in the template for actual quantity is as under:
OrderYieldConfirmed / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit
= 'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )
Please tell me what I need to do to the above formula to make it convert boxes to eaches using conversion factor in the material master?
A similar formula has worked beautifully for 'cost estimate'
OrderTotalQuantity / AltQtyFactorFromMaterial( AlternativeQuantityUnit =
'BX', Material = OrderMaterialNumber )

Additional cost for finished goods

Hi all,
Here we are following fifo method valuation. we are using SAP B1 2007B PL 04.
I have a doubt how do we account the additional cost like Rent, Electricity etc.
and What G/L Account need to specify at determination level. Here we are determing G/L account with account groups.
I have a document for that but that doesnt give me clear picture of additional cost and
G/L accounts.
Kindly explain me in details with respectives to G/L Accounts
Regards
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
static costs should be included in a BOM as standard cost items. This will add to the item cost of the finished product.
Have a look at our Wiki here (Expert on Phone Newsletter April 2008):
[How to include labour cost in a BOM.|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/Howtoincludelabourcostina+BOM.]
You can substitute other costs for 'labour'.
All the best,
Kerstin

To add additional cost to specific cst component in cst component structure

Hi All,
We have an issue related to Product Costing.
The requirement is to add 5% additional cost to one specific cost component in cost component structure related to material handling (now coming as variable cost). The assigned cost elements to this cost component have cost element category as 41 (overhead rates). The requirement is to display this 5% additional cost on the single cost component only in cost component split.
If anyone has worked on similar requirement, could you please let me know how to proceed on this.
Thanks in advance for your valuable feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Darshanjeet Singh Sachdeva

Hi
Use CK74N.. You can add the value you want and also the cost ele of your choice.. Save it in CK74N
Now when you run CK11N, the cost you added in CK74N would get added to CK11N's own cost
br, Ajay M

Display vendor name in the additional costs details for the PO

Hi,
I was wandering if there is any possibility to display vendor's name in the additional costs detail in the conditions tab in PO.
As for standard, only the vendor number is shown.
Regards.

Hi,
It is not possible to view the name of vendor there in "Addiitonal Data" screen for the condition type.

When i use function module to create additive costs using KKPI_BDC_ADD_ON_C

Hi,
When i use function module KKPI_BDC_ADD_ON_COSTS_CREATE to create additive costs it shows an error. The error is 'THE OBJECT IS LOCKED BY THE USER SARKARD' the transaction it uses is CK74 for creating.
I have also read about KKP4_ADD_ON_COSTS_CREATE. But i dont know the usage of it..
I think it will be helpful if u can clarify with first FM.
Kindly suggest.
Thank you.
Harsha

Hi Harsha,
I have a similar requirement, but the issue that I am facing is that I can not find any parameter in the FM - KKPI_BDC_ADD_ON_COSTS_CREATE for Valuation Date which is a mandatory field in CK74. How did you overcome that issue, can you please share ?

Import Duty 10% & Additive Cost

Hi Guru,
Is there possibilty to create % in additive cost. Eg Import need to be incorporate into the costing run of the raw material.
If can, please advice how to do it and cannot advice how to bring this cost into the coting run.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Thanks.
Regards,
Kulasingam Balasingam

Hi
A material cost estimate in which you can enter costs manually in the form of a unit cost estimate, so that the manual costs can be added to an automatic cost estimate with quantity structure.
To ensure that the additive costs are included, set the indicator Incl. additive costs for each valuation strategy in the valuation variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning.
Specify the following through the costing variant in Customizing for Product Cost Planning:
o Whether any existing additive costs are to be included in cost estimates that you create with this costing variant
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when calculating overhead
o Whether the additive costs are to be included when transferring stock to another plant.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/EN/7e/cb81fa43a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards

Additive Cost and Variance Calcultion

We started using Tcode CK74N to enter additive costs for certian materials. I did the configuration needed in the costing variant and added a cost element for additive costs in the cost component structure.
Everything is working fine, when we run CK11n for a material that already have an additive cost estimate, the additive costs are being picked up and included in the cost estimate. if we mark and release the cost estimate the additive costs are being reflected in the new standard, so far so good.
My question is around the variance postings that happen once we enter a production order and settle the variance at period end.
lets look at this example
Assume the following:
Material X current standard = $100
Order X quantity produced =10 cases
Material X NEW standard after negative additive cost =$80
Scenario 1 (no additive costs) the total debits (Actual postings form material consumption and activity confirmation) to a the order = $900
The total credit was $1000 (standard*quantity produced) , a $100 in variance will occur, and the posting at settlement will be to Debit the price difference account and to credit the cost of sales account for $100. This is the normal case
Scenario 2 : We included a -$200 of additive costs for that material in the standard (new Standard is 80) , the credit to the order will be $800 instead of $1000 , which will make the variance -$200 and the posting currently is to DR cost of sales and credit price difference account for $200
The business and Based on scenario 2 wants to automatically generate a posting to the ACTUAL side of the production order equivalent to the additional variance caused by additive costs? which will put the variance back at 100.
They would like to see a credit to the cost element used in the cost component structure to book additive costs. and the reminder of the variance 100 in our example should continue to be booked to the same price different account .
If this is possible and right to do? what account should be used to offset this credit that being proposed to the additive cost element ? Because I assume that a new FI document should be created to record the credit?
Thanks for your help

Hey,
It depends a little upon the settlement rule of your process/production order.
If you are settling to the material (MAT), the price difference will only be accounted for with one line, without separation between difference coming from additive costs and other differences.
If you are settling not via within CO, you maybe have the possibility the way you settle, but I can not see how you can use such a logic in a settlement process.
What I would do, is to create a custom reposting program, which reposts the additive cost difference separately, after which the normal settlement can take care of the remaining difference.
Regards,
Koen

Additive costs

Hi friends,
We have an issue related to Additive Cost. some costs which have been put live in the system since go-live have used additive costs to deliver the fixed ohd into the product cost instead of the purchase order condition type and
when conducting a cost roll up (CK40N), we were finding that we were getting 2 lots of additive cost because we have loaded new additive cost values from 1st may but we think the reason is that the we have loaded additive costs via the upload (CK74) but they are also pulling from the purchase order condition type so we are getting two lots of cost.
So we think the fix is that purchasing must update their condition types and we realised that the additive costs shouldn't have been loaded and we have deleted the additive costs because they never should have been loaded.
So advise me do we need to stop to upload or any other way to stop two times cost values.
Raju

Freight cost is added on to the basic standard cost of materials, which is fine. Basic cost of materials comes from regular cost estimate and the freight from additive. Now when a purchase order is raised, the vendor needs to be given a purchase order only for the basic price and not the freight. The material could be brought by own transport or the vendor charging separately for freight.
That being the assumption, the purchase order is loaded with a accrual type condition type for freight, which shall customized to create an accrual entry upon purchase. This could be meaningful to reduce/avoid the unwanted effect of distorted purchase price variance.

Additional cost in invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for