To add additional cost to specific cst component in cst component structure

Hi All,
We have an issue related to Product Costing.
The requirement is to add 5% additional cost to one specific cost component in cost component structure related to material handling (now coming as variable cost). The assigned cost elements to this cost component have cost element category as 41 (overhead rates). The requirement is to display this 5% additional cost on the single cost component only in cost component split.
If anyone has worked on similar requirement, could you please let me know how to proceed on this.
Thanks in advance for your valuable feedback.
Thanks & Regards,
Darshanjeet Singh Sachdeva

Hi
Use CK74N.. You can add the value you want and also the cost ele of your choice.. Save it in CK74N
Now when you run CK11N, the cost you added in CK74N would get added to CK11N's own cost
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

Additive costs getting added to raw material consumption account

Hi,
when i run ck11n , the additive costs are getting added to raw material consumption account, how can i split them .please advice
Thanks

Check the cost elements in OKTZ.
If there is any surcharge applicable on that material, we use CK74 to add "Additive Cost". When you run the CK11N, it shows separately in the last with separate cost element with values updated in CK74.
You might have assigned the Material consumption cost elemtn in CK74. Just check it
Hope this helps
Thanks

Add addition import duty cost to materials for costing run

Hi All,
Whats the best solution to add the additional cost of import duty on materials imported into China?
Is adding an additive cost (CK74N) possible and the best solution? This way it will be picked up automatically in costing run?
Cheers
Tony

Thanks Jeyakanthan. Can you give me more details though?
Are you saying to configure the additive cost? Assign it to the materials in question and then run the costing run?

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse

Subject: LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in warehouse and not accounting for the year 2008)
Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30               01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298                      07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298           07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Thomas,
I presume that your client has activated 'Revenue Recognition' component in SAP.
If your client has already activated the RR component, they may be aware that the activation is unreversible.
Recognition of costs in a deferred revenue scenario requires some customization effort but definitely do-able. It is not falling within standard SAP.
I worked on scope of one such project but it did not happen unfortunately.
Can you please post your regular updates in this forum?
All the best.
Thanks
PS: I am not an employee of SAP AG and by answering questions, I am not getting any monetary benefits anywhere. I am answering questions here in my spare time for recognition and the points awarded, which gives me a sense of self-satisfaction. Awarding points is also a way of saying thanks and it will encourage me to answer more questions and share my knowledge and experience

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

User forgot to add delivery costs to purchase order

Got a user that forgot to add delivery costs to a purchase order, now it has been GR and IRd, now they want to add the delivery costs, of course they have to reverse the IR and possibly the GR as well, go to change mode and add this missing condition manually
any other options for doing this?? dont think the invoice has been paid yet
Thanks

Dear Mark Ojo.
Try to think of this missing activity, User/Client can mistake/forget this delivery cost
at anytime. so, you can consider for solving this missing amount as below ;
   - If already this finished the GR and IR procedures, (but invoice has not been paid yet),
     best way is also cancellation of entire posted document, but i think that you just try to
     apply this delivery cost to MIRO (--> Unplanned delivery costs).
   1) MIRO --> "Unplanned delivery costs" on the Detail Tab Screen.
      If you are using the conventional Invoice Verification component, the system splits up the
      delivery costs entered among the individual items, based on the amounts invoiced so far
      plus those in the invoice being entered.
      If you are using Logistics Invoice Verification, how the unplanned delivery costs are posted
     depends on the Customizing settings. There are two possibilities:
       - Unplanned delivery costs are split up as in conventional Invoice Verification.
       - Unplanned delivery costs are posted in a separate posting line to a G/L account set
         up for this.
     2) MIRO --> "Subsequent Debit" on the first screen.
         Specifies which transaction you can choose "Subsequent Debit" for such as when you
         received an invoice from your vendor for delivered goods.Delivery costs are to be charged.
         on the other hand, if you received a credit memo for delivered goods(previously charged
         delivery costs are to be credited) , you can choose "Subsequent Credit".
Regards,
Jeong, Yeong-Chul

Additive cost in Std Cost estimate

Hi
I have a requirement to add extra cost in a material cost estimate for certain plants. Because of this I have two costing variants in our case. One is without this extra cost and another with extra cost. This cost is actually freight cost for certain materials.
For this purpose I am planning to use additive cost. I have created one item in the cost component structure and assigned the cost element for this additive cost.
I think that is all I require with regard to additive cost. Now when I try to enter additive cost, system showing some screen showing resources and all. I am not able to understand how can I enter it as a resource ?

Hi Nikita
I wont recommend allocation from cost center to prod orders....
You will have a toughtime entering the SKFs for the prod orders... You would agree that you would need tracing factor in the allocation cycle... which would be SKF... You need to identify the prod orders processed during the month, then enter SKF for them and then execute allocation cycle
Just think about it... May be you would realize the complicacy of it... I would suggest to use a costing sheet or a template allocation.. I dont know how the later works, I am nt an expert at it
Regards
Ajay M

Additive Cost

I am preparing a standard cost estimate and for that a cost component structure is also prepared. I am thinking about using additive cost functionality (ex. I want to add some extra cost like Depreciation.). I am not sure how this will appear in the subsequent operations. Will this be available in the standard cost estimate generated ? Please throw some light on this.

closed

Additive cost not seen in production order and while settling hits PRD

I am using additive costs for my product costing via CK74n.
Cost estimate looks good since I have the valuation variants setup to include additive costs.
But when I see the production order that is being created, all others costs are being considered except additive costs. They are recognized but not as a line item instead as a variance. When I settle the order the costs actually hit price difference account and not even the GL account that I had assigned for the additive cost. SAP did not consider the cost as variance even if it was showing up as variance initially. This as I understood is partly because of the settlement rule that I have in place which tells SAP to go and settle on the material (which is standard SAP to do since I want all the costs from the production order to settle on the eventual material going into stock) so SAP went on to settling on the material. Since the material is set as standard price the variance is being booked as a price difference entry.
Ideally I would have expected the additive cost getting debited to the order and credited to the gl account that I assigned for the additive cost. The eventual cost (incl. additive cost) should hit the inventory.
Am I missing a step?

Hi Sapluver,
Appreciate your prompt response..Please see my response in italics
Few queries related to your post.
1. So your standard cost got two part, one with quantity structure ( materials, labor, OSC etc) which the system cost automatically and one manual part, which is your additive cost. While costing system picks up this manual part from CK74N.
I hope this part you got correct. Yes, the cost estimate is reading from both the qty structure and the additive costs and the cost roll-up is coming up correctly
2. Now in actual cost controlling, i think System is not sure how to valuate your additive cost actual part.I agree, the additive cost does appear in the cost analysis section of the production order but does not show up as a line item initially. Instead it comes up as a difference item right in the bottom of the screen after totals have been displayed without any line item reference. As if the system is not sure how to display the line item. Once I have done the material issuance confirmation to the order, the additive cost got picked up correctly as I have set it up in the cost component structure as material overhead but again shows up only as variance
Which method you used to debit your production order with additive cost, is it a normal journal entry or through some automatic posting through routing ( example OSC through Purchase order/Good Receipt).I probably need to understand your point more clearly? I am not manually debiting the production order at all for the additive cost. I was expecting SAP to debit the order the same way it does for overheads. Overheads too initially show up as variance but then when we run the overhead calculation KGI2 the overheads costs get debited to the production order. Was expecting similar behavior for additive costs. I am receiving the finished product from the production order into stock via MIGO goods receipt movement type 101. I was expecting the debit to happen perhaps at the time of settlement via CO88 but here the system posted it to the price difference account via account key PRD. This I understand the system did because the settlement rule is set to post all the costs on the material and the material has the valuation control as standard price; so the system is seeing the additive cost as a price difference hence posting it to the price difference account.
System is unaware of the additive cost from actual cost point of view, there is no specification to additive cost from costing variant for actual cost. So you have to debit the order with the additive cost part.So do I manually debit the order with the additive cost? What about the price difference additive cost sitting on the order? Would appreciate if you can tell me the process steps for posting this correctly
regards
Sapluver

How to input Additive costs

Hello,
kindly let me know how to we inout additive costs for any materail to show it in the cost estimate, i have acitivate the update additive costs in the costing varaint.
we want to include the freight costs as addtivie costs and add it to the standarad price of that material,
please let me know ,

Step 1
As a first step ensure that in ( OKKN ) valuation variant within the costing variant you are costing has the additive cost check box checked for material valuation. (You need to check against every strategy, if needed). When that priority is picked, where the additive cost is checked, then the additive cost is applied else not.
Step 2
Through CK74N Maintain the additive cost. Enter the the material, the same costing variant and within that screen you can maintain a variable item category. You need to populate the Quantity field,Desctiption, Price-Total, Price Unit, Cost element. (Ensure the cost element in included in the cost component structure under the right head). Save it.
Step 3
Come to CK11N and run the cost estimate for the same material. You can see that besides the value as per strategy, the additive cost is also included.

With remote_os_authent being deprecated, will replacement come with additional cost?

One of our applications uses AD with remote_os_authent for single sign on (for some users) to the underlying database.
The database is currently on 9iR2 but will soon be moved to 11gR2 - with remote_os_authent now deprecated, I am under the impression from the vendor that one has to now add Oracles Access Manager with it's extra cost now that remote_os_authent is being phased out.
The vendor's app is tied in with Microsoft Active Directory to pass along credentials to implement single sign on, as a result of remote_os_authent being deprecated they tell me many of their customers are balking at purchasing an additional license(s) so they have now ported the application to use MSSQL database for a back end, as MSSQL provides integration with AD at no extra cost. This is an option I have been asked to look into as well, if there is going to be an extra cost to what we've already been using at no cost.
I've not had a lot of experience with remote_os_authent, and am confused if integrating database logins with AD specifically requires the remote_os_authent parameter or one can create a user identified externally and have AD pass the domain credentials without the remote_os_authent parameter. We have EE licensing and if I have to purchase an additional product at an additional cost now then I'll likely look at having them port the app to use MSSQL as well.
Anyone else running into this?
thanks in advance

Anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.
You may need to skip 11g and go straight to 12c.
Oracle Database Editions
"Enterprise User Security is an EE feature for directory-based management of database users. It does require a corresponding Oracle Identity Management Directory Services Plus to be licensed.
Usage of Enterprise User Security with Oracle Database strong authentication (PKI, Kerberos) no longer requires Oracle Advanced Security to be licensed"
As far as I know: kerberos === Windows 2008+ AD
Again - anything regarding licensing, please check with your friendly sales rep.

Is it possible to add 'Additional Data C' tab in VA01/VA02/VA03

Hi All,
Is there any way or in config that we can enhance the VA01/VA02/VA02 with one more tab other than 'Additional Data B' tab.
i want to add 'Additional Data C' tab for a requirement.
Please give your valuable comments.
Thanks,
Jaffer Ali.S

Hi ,
It can't done for the VA01/VA02/VA03.
these are available for the .
V45A0001 Determine alternative materials for product selection --->The Description of this enhancement tell us that it determines the alternative materials for product selection. (i.e., If one material is not available what is the other material that has to be used as an alternative. So it is item specific).
V45A0002 Predefine sold-to party in sales document--->By Description we understand that we can predefine sold-to party in the sales document. (i.e., it is used to populate the field sold-to party through user-exit while entering the data. ) But our requirement comes after entering the data in the screen and save button is pressed.
V45A0003 Collector for customer function modulpool MV45A
V45A0004 Copy packing proposal---->Copy packing proposal Into Out bound delivery. This description implies that whenever we create a Delivery Order from Sales Order it copies the packing proposal Based on the already created Sales order. So, there is no chance for us to save the data while we create or change a Sales order.
We can't done.
Regards,
Bharani

LOADING ADDITIONAL COSTS (change matches revenue cost of goods in Stock and

Problem:
we must add the cost of goods of the raw material (for which was made a check invoice) of the costs, which are arising and charged by different suppliers (transport, freight, insurance, etc. ..). These are already included in FI with fb60.
The result should be:
- From the consignment of goods entering, add (only in Warehouse (STOCK), NOT IN ACCOUNTING ') cost accessory
- Do not change the quantity
- Having the total cost of stock
- Exploiting the average cost to FIFO must consider the total cost after additional adjustment
Example:                                                                                data
ME21N: purchaise order No. 321 = article 1000kg a price of u20AC / kg 2.30          01/07/2008
MIGO: goods receipt PO confirms price quantity x (u20AC 23,000) batch 298          07/07/2008
MIRO(enter incoming invoice): Check invoice OK per (u20AC 23,000) batch 298       07/08/2008
Invoices received for costs Accessories:                                                                08/08/2008
FB60: transportation bill on all'purchaise order above cost u20AC / 0.11 kg
0.11 * 1000kg = 110 recorded in cost and accounting of stock.
In accounting, the cost has been reported, in warehouse I need to reverse (add) u20AC / kg to 0.11 initial cost of u20AC / 2.30 kg without adjustments in general accounting, but only in warehouse value and not in the quantity.
So in the end I should have:
batch n° 298 - kg 1000 at a cost of u20AC 2.41 (2.30 +0.11) for the year 2008. How should I do?
thanks

Hi Rahul,
In My GRPO in all there are e items in 2, 3 and 4 qty respectively.
During GRPO:
Finished Product=149610
During Landed Cost:
Finished Product= 35764.22
So (149610+35764.22)/GRPO Qty (9) = Per Unit Cost during GRPO (20597.135)
Now when you sale against above GRPO then
you COGS Will be
In my invoice i sold all the above items in qty 1 each so
COGS= Per Unit Cost during GRPO ( 20597.135) * Sales Qty(3) Dr,
Finished Product= 32634.71 (CR) does not come to this
So this Finished Product 32634.71 (CR) is nothing but Per Unit Cost during GRPO*Sales Qty
Am i doing something wrong ?
Thanks
Malhaar

Additional cost for finished goods

Hi all,
Here we are following fifo method valuation. we are using SAP B1 2007B PL 04.
I have a doubt how do we account the additional cost like Rent, Electricity etc.
and What G/L Account need to specify at determination level. Here we are determing G/L account with account groups.
I have a document for that but that doesnt give me clear picture of additional cost and
G/L accounts.
Kindly explain me in details with respectives to G/L Accounts
Regards
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
static costs should be included in a BOM as standard cost items. This will add to the item cost of the finished product.
Have a look at our Wiki here (Expert on Phone Newsletter April 2008):
[How to include labour cost in a BOM.|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/Howtoincludelabourcostina+BOM.]
You can substitute other costs for 'labour'.
All the best,
Kerstin

Add additional tab on item level in contract for customer fields

Hi Guys,
Does anyone know if the following is possible in SRM 7.0, and if so can you please give a very short description how to accomplish this -
In addition to the standard tabs available in the contract (general data, notes, conditions etc.), is it possible to add a new customer specific tab on item level, in a central contract and add some customer fields to this tab?
I know it is possible to add customer fields in SRM, but I am curious if I can create a new tab for these fields, so that I can group all customer fields together in one place.
Thx.
Kind Regards,
Skander

Yes. it is possible but you have to take care of in the back end too and how these fields comes and sit in ECC. so that you may need to map in the IDOC or XI data . so that these information must be pssed to ECC and available and accordingly you need to change in purchase order too since all these data will be copied into purchase order too.
for example :- if you add one field in header level /item level of contract
and it must be coppied into Backend contract as well as your next consecutive docuemnt like Purchase order must be taken care. hope you understand now.
Muthu

To add additional cost to specific cst component in cst component structure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for