Additional Invoice Plan for Periodic Invoicing

HI,
Can any body help me to configure periodic invoice plan....
i can see the determination rule is available for Monthly, weekly, daily and yearly.
but how to configure for Quarterly & Half yearly..?
t. code: OM7R - table for rule determination. wanted to add the "Time unit" - Quarterly , & Half Yearly.
Say my invoice plan will be : 4 times a year say - Jan - Mar, Apr - Jun, July - Sep, Oct - Dec.
and half yearly - April - Sep, Oct - March
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/MM-SRVTheInvoicing+Plan - Could nt get the help to define this requirement.

Hi,
Time Unit is standard one, you cant chage or add more on it.
And as per your requirement, you need not to add any Time Unit.
It is possible thro the standard itself.
For that, You go to 'Dfine Rules for Date Determination'.
There you create a Rule that include with Time Unit-Month & Time Period-3.
So, it will take Quarterly. If you change Time Period-6, it will take Half yearly.

Similar Messages

Cost element/cost center planning for period

Dear Guru`s,
My client wan`t to plan the g/l with cost center/cost element period wise. How can I achieve this???

Hi..
If you transfer plan data from cost center accounting to Financial Accounting, refer to sap help portal site:Transferring Plan Data from Cost Center Accounting - General Ledger Accounting (FI-GL) (New) - SAP Library

Additional Data Plan Issues

I have purchased an additional data plan for 3GB on top of the one I currently have active. I have around 1GB left on the current on however when I look at the account overciew it says for the additional plan I had purchased that I only have 2GB instead of 3GB. Is this a typical issue and why doesn't it say I have 1GB with the current plan left and 3GB with the additional plan left?

When did you purchase the additional data? If it was in the middle of a billing cycle, the data allowed will be prorated for the current cycle, and then you will get the full amount for the new billing cycle.
My guess would be that you made the purchase about 10 days into your billing cycle, resulting in the allowance being prorated for 20/30 days remaining, or 2 out of the 3 GB you expected.

Invoicing plan for purchase order

Hi experts
There is invoicing plan facility in SAP. Can we use it in following scenario.
We have a separate type of purchase order for services. On daily basis we prepare the service entry sheet against the said purchase order as and when service is completed.
Now my question is CAN SYSTEM GENERATE A INVOICE OF A VENDOR FOR GIVEN TIME FRAME OF SAY 15 DAYS or ONCE IN MONTH.
IF YES HOW???
Atul kulkarni

Dear Atul,
If you have service contract with vendor and do not wait for vendor invoice that time you can plan for automatical invoice on base of PO.
And you can make the payment against that invoice and you can keep the good relation with vendor.
you can use perodic invoice plan for this situation . Please check this link for your more information.
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/use-of-invoice-plan-in-sap.htm
Regards,
PK.

Invoice Planning for a PO

Hi,
Did anyone have know any BAPI/FM to create Invoice Planning for a Purchase order.
Path in the which Invoice Plan is created through transaction.
In transaction ME22N --> There is a tab Invoice --> In that there is a button Invoicing Planning --> If we press that button it will give a pop-up Specify Invoicing plan --> Select any one --> Press Continue --> It will take you to a screen. In transaction ME22N --> There is a tab Invoice --> In that there is a button Invoicing Planning --> If we press that button it will give a pop-up Specify Invoicing plan --> Select any one --> Press Continue --> It will take you to a screen. After entering necessary details come back to PO screen and save it.
Regards,
Prakash.
Message was edited by: Prakash Ramu

Hi Ram,
I too got the same requrement. I think you have found a solution for this problem.
Please tell me how to create invoince plan with a BAPI or any other method.
regards,
Ravi

Depreciation planned for wrong period

Dear All,
In Asset Master the depreciation is settle to start in 01.10.2010, I already run depreciations for all assets in period 10 but not for period 11.
I only acquired the asset after running depreciation for period 10, so in AFAB I have to run depreciation again for period 10 in "repeat" mode right?
Problem is...when I do that, the outcome is zero as if I didn´t make a new acquisition for that period, after that I went to asset explorer (AW01N) and in tab "Posted values" depreciations only starts in period 11.
Example (of what is shown in asset in AW01N):
Acquisition value: 1000 $
Acquisition date: 15.10.2010
Dep. start date: 01.10.2010 (period 10 already been run)
Planned values:
- period 11: 50 $
- period 12: 25 $
Why depreciation doesn´t starts in period 10? Instead period 11 "eats" values from period 10. I want to run again period 10 but it doesn´t have values. Can anyone tell me why this happens?
Thanks in advance,
MG.

Hi,
You can execute depreciation again for period 10 with repeat option.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Posted depreciation is missing in period 7, planned depreciation for period 8 is doubled

Hi Experts,
I would like to ask for some explanation for this issue and how to correct the error.
Performed Depreciation run via AFAB transaction.
then upon checking in asset explorer. period 7 is missing while the amount in planned depreciation for period 8 is doubled.
could you please explain how and why this thing happened?
thanks in advance!

solved.

The delivery date for the PR needs to consider planning Calender Periods

Hi Friends,
Please help me in solving in my scenario given below:
The Planning calender periods are from Monday through Thursday(No Friday and weekends). When there is a Purchase Requisition (PR) planned date on Monday and the GR processing time is one day. The delivery date should be on the before Thursday (Becasue there is no period on Friday).
But, the delivery date is being created with the before Friday, which shouldn't happen.(Requirement is that Delivery date shouldn't consider that friday, hence, the delivery date needs to be on Thursday).
NOTE: The lot size settings are Lot sizing Procedure : P(Period lot sizing procedure), Lot-size indicator: K (Period lot size as in Planning Calender), Scheduling : 1 (Period Start = Delivery date).
Thanks for helping me in advance,
Surendra Chakka

Hi Santosh,
Thanks for your Questions. Below are the explainations:
1. Can you expalin how your system is behaving at the moment?
A. Presently the GR Processing time is 1 day for a material in Plant. So, if the user wants to produce on Wednesday (Planned date in PR, provided by the MRP run), then the delivery should be on Tuesday (Because GR processing time is 1 day). In the same way, he dont wants the delivery to be on Friday. I mean, if he wants to produce on Monday, he wants the delivery to be on Thursday.
Only Friday, he don't wants to make the Delivery.(The delivery date should not show Friday in PR's).
2. Pls explain your original MRP view and planning calendor setting...
A. For solving of the above issue, we changed the Lot size to copy of "PK" - Period lot size acc to planniong calendar. Then we maintained the Planning calendar, in which the periods are for every Monday, tuesday, wednesday and thursday. Expecting, the delivery should be excluded for friday, the friday in the planning calendar is not given as a period.
The scheduling paramter in the Lotsize is tried with both the options (period start = Deliery date and period end = Delivery date).
Later removed "PD" in MRP type and tried with "R1" Time phase req. But, the precondition for this is to maintain "Forecast req". This is also done. But, then, the system for this material is not responding to the MRP run. It is asking to run the forecast model. We ar not using SOP.
3. The results thst you get with current setting?
A. For the planned date in PR of Monday, the delivery date in PR is on the day before monday. i.e., Friday (Saturday and sundays are holidays).
4. Expected results...?
A. For the planned date in PR of Monday, the delivery date in PR should be Thursday (the day before monday production).
Hope, i am clear in my explaination. Please revert back, if you need any more information.
Thanks and Regards
Surendra Chakka

Hello, I got the plan for individuals of 10 dolars monthly. Now my trial period pf photoshop finished, so the program does not open it ask me for a license number, and I have not recived that number... so now I what happening is I am paying 10 dolar per m

Hello, I got the plan for individuals of 10 dollars monthly. Now my trial period of Photoshop finished, so the program does not open it ask me for a license number, and I have not received that number... so now I what happening is I am paying 10 dollar per month and my Photoshop does not work. Could somebody let me know how I go from the trial to the real Photoshop?

http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-network-issues.html
Mylenium

Planning for Next financial period

Dear all
I am with a company which had gone live one year back
I have just joined the CO team. I want to know how
we can generate a cost centrewise planning for various
cost elements ( atleat primary cost elements ) based on
the LTP run for the next financial period
FYI our financial year ends on 31 3 07. We are likely
to get the sales forecast for 2007-08 sometime by
mid Jan 07. Given this input, when PP runs the LTP
in say End Jan, what should I do to make the system
compute the cost centre / primary cost element wise
anticipated planned expenses based on 2007 - 08 sales
forecast
Grateful your expert advice
Thanks and regards
Murali

Hello Sumithra,
Please see below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/08/5149cf43b511d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Santosh

Additional Credit Limit for certain period

Dear Friends,
My Client want a functionality where we can give additional credit limit for particular customer for particular duration.
Since the value for each customer will vary we cannot use credit limit seasonal factor in OVA8.
I want to maintain a Z Table with Customer No., From Date, To date and additional limit.
But how can I force the system to add this value in credit limit given in FD32 while performing credit check in sales order.
We are using the static credit check and in same functionality this additional limit value should be added if customer is maintained in Z table and if it falls within specified date.
Please advice.
Regards
Mayank

Dear Mayank
If possible make different credit control areas.
decentralised credit management.
for each credit limit , set the credit amount.
change the credit control area for the customers as per additional credit limit .
A proper setting in FD32 , OVA8 and horizon period may give the results,
just an example-
                                 ex1      / ex2
credit controlarea - ABC      / xyz
Credit amount      - 100$     / 150$
horizon period     - 2months / 1month
-Jay

HT201299 Is there a way to "sync" up my iPad to iPhone for accessing Internet on my iPad while riding in a vehicle? I did not want to get an additional data plan.

Is there a way to "sync" up my iPad to iPhone for accessing Internet on my iPad while riding in a vehicle? I did not want to get an additional data plan.

If your cellular plan/carrier allows use of the iPhone as a hot spot, yes. Verizon does on some plans, at least in my area, but I can't speak for other providers.Set up on the iPhone is in the Settings App > Personal Hotspot.

HT4157 I want to set up my data plan for my iPad however I am in Germany for the next 3 months. Will this plan work the same here as it would in the US? Is there anything I would need to do in addition to get the service I need out here?

I just moved to Germany and want to set up the data plan for my iPad. I currently have the iPad linked to at&t however have not yet set up service. I am afraid that I will pay for it and not be able to use it out here. Will the standard at&t cellular data plan work in Germany or am I out of luck??

BobTheFisherman wrote:
http://www.apple.com/ipad/LTE/ Note that Germany is included in the list for LTE depending on your iPad model.
but not an AT&T as clearly stated by OP ( unless you can use a Verizon/Sprint model on AT&T )
Looks like we both need to read the OP more carefully

Transferring the additional hours to current period during retro run

Hi Experts,
We are have Pension contribution plan in 0169 where wage type 9XXX that takes in total hours from /229 via custom PCR. . Then the hours are multiplied by a constant stored in table T511K. The problem is that suppose we have created a record for hours in IT 2010 for some previous period during the current run and want to reflect that change with the a retro run. i.e 97XX should take in hours from /229 in the current period plus those additional hours give in some previous period and reflect the same in the current period. And this not happening.
E.g. In for period 04 say, we want the hours also that have in given additionally for in period 02. We have checked tables V_51P6_B as well as V_51P6_C for 9XXX and it's OK.
Are we missing something here?

Like other deductions (other than taxes), retroactive changes to the deduction amount should be carried forward to the current pay through tables DDNTK and ARRRS, since you can't change the Net Pay Amount of the previous pay.
For retroactive changes to Payments, such as hours recorded in IT2010, the payment calculation will usually happen in the retroactive pay, Staturory Deductions (such as Income Tax) will be calculated and the resulting change in net income will be carried forward to the current pay.
If the current calculation does not meet your requirements, you probably need to create a few PCRs to work around the problem.
If possible, any variation in the value of /229 should be carried forwart to the current pay (through Output and Input WTs) before function P0169.
The alternative would be to create a series of PCRs before and after that function so that the retroactive pay would always use the original value of /229 (without changing it's value in RT) and that the current pay's value of /229 would be modified temporarily to reflect the retroactive changes (without changing it's value in RT).

Multiple plans for my SQL- Which one is following?-11gr2

11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. When I tried to get its execution plan im seeing multiple plan_plan values. That means, multiple plans for
same sql_id
How could we know that which plan my sql_id is following.?
SQL> set lines 300
SQL> set pages 50
SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('5z1r29wc6514q'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 216300602
| Id | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       | 1350 (100)|       |          |       |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   333 | 40293 | 1350   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   333 | 40293 | 1348   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       | 1638 |   161K|   866   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   8 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
|   9 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       | 1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
| 10 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            | 1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
| 11 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   | 1581 |   103K|   864   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
| 12 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               | 6048 |   118K|   481   (1)| 00:00:06 |       |       |
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 1282779260
| Id | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       | 1392 (100)|       |          |       |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   325 | 39000 | 1392   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   325 | 39000 | 1391   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               | 5972 |   116K|   550   (1)| 00:00:07 |       |       |
|   4 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
|   5 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       | 1794 |   175K|   840   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
|   6 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   8 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   9 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
| 10 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       | 1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
| 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            | 1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
| 12 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   | 1722 |   110K|   838   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------also, Any suggestions to tune this query
Thanks

Harry wrote:
11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. how do plan on modifying 3 ^rd^ party application?

Additional Invoice Plan for Periodic Invoicing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for