Advance Folio Creation in UCM 11g

Hi,
I want to create advance folio in 11g through java coding.
Please let me know the steps of creation.
Thanks.

Show us what code you already have and we can help debug it.
The same code that works for 10g should work for 11g.
Here are a few threads that may help.
Re: New Folio creation
Re: How to Create programmaticly Folio from a Folio template using CIS API?
UCM and folio servies
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=9301674
Re: UPDATE_FOLIO service
Create folio and add content to it using CIS 11g
Jonathan Hult
http://redstonecontentsolutions.com
http://corecontentonly.com

Similar Messages

Collaboration features in UCM 11g

I have a requirement where I need to implement collaboration on a content in UCM
11g.Users will be able to provide comments on a content which I need to show in
the content info page.
I want to know the best possible way to achieve this.Is any out of box component
available for this?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Dipankar

There are several levels how to achieve that:
1. the simplest one is using a metadata field - there is one called Comment. The obvious disadvantage is that it has limited length (2K characters), and users may overwrite comments of the others
2. a more advanced, and I believe it could be sufficient to your needs, is using discussions (Threaded Discussion component). You may find details about this component here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/doc.1111/e10797/c04_working_with_files.htm#CSUSG884
3. even more advanced, but need additional licenses, is creation of context-aware comments (mark-ups), often to non-editable formats. The advantage of that approach is that a user is able to place his or her comment directly in the place where the comment is relevant. UCM is integrated with AutoVue, an Oracle application, which is capable of that. Also, OnTrack (renamed to Oracle Social Network) has this feature, and I believe in the future this is probably the direction to go.

How to use RelatedContent component with UCM 11g without Records Management

As the subject really...
I have been playing around with UCM 11g and want to use the RelatedContent component in isolation of URM / Records management.
Can I still do this, and is it supported.
I have had a look at advanced component manager and also the RMFC page but if I select a custom install with only related content I get a whole bunch of RM related stuff in the interface that I do not need.
Any suggestions? Is the old RelatedContent component supported directly on 11g?
Thanks
Tim
Edited by: Tim Snell on 24-Aug-2010 08:16

Hi,
First this post is really helpful as I was looking around for enabling related content component in ucm11g.
Now i am able to see it in my enabled component lists.
However , i have one doubt. I have enabled the component and restarted the server. After that if i got the checkin page, i can see only 'wwxRelatedContentTriggerDate' metadata for the related content. My assumption was when I enable the component, i will get a metadata on the content check in page to link to the other content items.
So can you please help me
1) to help whether my understanding is correct?
2) if yes, why am i not getting the metadata to specify the other contents is not shown? what I need to do for the same?
Thanks a lot in advance
Regards
Poornima

!csComponentDataNotFound, when enabling a custom compoent in UCM 11g.

Hi,
I am seeing following exception when enabling custom component in UCM 11g (through component manager). Any pointers on what could be the issue.
intradoc.common.ServiceException: !csComponentDataNotFound, DV_Eloqua
After enabling when i restart the server, i don't see this exception again and in the component manager the component looks enabled.
Logs are not clear on what is causing this. Can i Ignore this?
Thanks in advance,
Seshan K.

Hi,
I see this issue with install of all the custom components. The exception I pasted in previous post was just one of the many.
To give you some back ground,
This was done as part of migration effort from UCM 10gR3 to UCM 11g.
There custom components were developed for UCM 10gR3, we have updated the code to use RIDC and as part of migration to 11g.
Custom components were then installed to 11g using component manager.
This issue is not see in of the component installed, even that component was migrated from 10gR3.
Thanks and Regards,
Seshan K.

Related Content UCM 11g limitation?

Hello,
I'm trying to create lots of relations to a content, using the "Related Content" UCM 11g component. But it seems we have a "sad" limitation: it populated a memo field at metadata table with 2000 size!
How To Link More Than 200 Content Items when Using Related Content Component. [ID 1070481.1] - is this wrong?
MaxResults=10000 (config.cfg)
Event generated by user 'admin' at host 'CIS'. Unable to execute service ADD_RELATED_CONTENT and function addRelatedContent.
Unable to execute query 'UrelatedContentDocMeta(Update/*+ INDEX (DocMeta PK_DocMeta)*/ DocMeta set xRelatedContentList='CS:7:1:DAMQ293073:1,.....DAMQ294642:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294643:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294644:1,CS:7:1:DAMQ294645:1' where dID=294344)'. ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019, maximum: 2000)
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019, maximum: 2000). [ Details ]
An error has occurred. The stack trace below shows more information.
!csUserEventMessage,admin,CIS!$!csServiceDataException,ADD_RELATED_CONTENT,addRelatedContent!$!csDbUnableToExecuteQuery,UrelatedContentDocMeta(Update/*+ INDEX (DocMeta PK_DocMeta)*/ DocMeta set xRelatedContentList='CS:7:1:DAMQ293073:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294111:1\,.....CS:7:1:DAMQ294641:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294642:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294643:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294644:1\,CS:7:1:DAMQ294645:1' where dID=294344)!$ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019\, maximum: 2000)<br>!syJavaExceptionWrapper,java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "QUA_OCS"."DOCMETA"."XRELATEDCONTENTLIST" (actual: 2019\, maximum: 2000)<br>
intradoc.common.ServiceException: !csServiceDataException,ADD_RELATED_CONTENT,addRelatedContent!$
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.buildServiceException(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:2071)
at intradoc.server.Service.buildServiceException(Service.java:2207)
at intradoc.server.Service.createServiceExceptionEx(Service.java:2201)
at intradoc.server.Service.createServiceException(Service.java:2196)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.handleActionException(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1736)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.doAction(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1691)
at intradoc.server.Service.doAction(Service.java:476)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.doActions(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1439)
at intradoc.server.Service.doActions(Service.java:471)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.executeSubServiceCode(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1305)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeSubServiceCode(Service.java:3813)
at intradoc.server.ServiceRequestImplementor.executeServiceEx(ServiceRequestImplementor.java:1185)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeServiceEx(Service.java:3808)
at intradoc.server.Service.executeService(Service.java:3792)
at intradoc.server.Service.doSubService(Service.java:3707)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor410.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at intradoc.common.IdcMethodHolder.invokeMethod(IdcMethodHolder.java:86)
at intradoc.common.ClassHelperUtils.executeMethodEx(ClassHelperUtils.java:310)
at intradoc.common.ClassHelperUtils.executeMethod(ClassHelperUtils.java:295)
at intradoc.server.Service.doCodeEx(Service.java:549)
at intradoc.server.Service.doCode(Service.java:504)
Any work-arround?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Pedro Senos

You can pretty much do anything with metadata, but depending on how many "N" relations are can reach limits in HTML or query strings, or Javascript for Dropdown lists or DB tables.
So planning for maximum use is needed.
If you create a metadata field xRelationToSite and put a drop down list with the list of web sites or sections you want to relate content to, then each content can be set to relate to one or many sites.
Then a new field could be created like xRelationToFolder and you can link content to different folders so that one file is outside of folders but you can make a Virtual relation to 10 or whatever folders instead of copying the same file into 10 folders.
Or you can relate content to each other by setting a metadata field xRelate to one value for all related files. xRelate is a free text field and you can put any value in there. Then you can check in any number of files and specify any text string in xRelate and bing bang boom they are all related.
That is the 1 to many relation with one value being related to multiple files via that one metadata field value. You display the list by doing something like a Library folder query to simulate a folder. (Weblayout Editor)
Then you could create a new page and or a new query in the Library page with a query that uses an AND or an OR operator (or create your own customizations if you don't like the library pages) to take the relationship to a N to N or many to many relation.
Since this is all metadata it is not so hard code limited like other options that are maybe "easier" like the Related Content Component but it is more robust since it is conceptually simpler.

Does UCM 11g provide any default skinning options?

I have 2 questions basically:
1 )In UCM 10g there is an option to select skins IN My Profiles menu which provides 2 skin options, Oracle and Oracle2.. Is it possible in 10 G to create a website and use these two skins in your website to change menu, layout etc?
2) My actual area of work is to create a website in UCM 11g, i couldn't find any such option in 11 G which 10 G provided in My Profiles. Are there any default skins provided by 11G. How can I make use of these skins in my web application?
I found out that we can apply different kind of skins in 11g using ADF Faces. But that is not to be used in my project. Is it the only option in 11g?
Thanks in advance.

OK I think you have confused two things here.
1)UCM ships with a native interface that is delivered by UCM based on HCSP/IDOC (A proprietary server side scripting language for generating HTML) this has been the case for about 10 years or so. THis native interface is used to provide the basic CMS capability and is oftent used as a simple clean front end for document management type deployments. UCM has very limited abilities to natively support personalisation (it does this by storing user settings on the file system) and one part of this is the ability to choose a layout and a skin. THe rendering of this profile is done via the HCSP/IDOC.
2)Since the Oracle acquisition of Stellent (~2007) there have been a number of productised ways to integrate UCM behind the Oracle ADF front ends of JDeveloper, WebCenter etc. The latest version of Site Studio lets you do just that using SSXA. I am not an ADF guru switiching between skins sounds perfeclty reasonable. BUT this has NOTHING to do with the old Oracle Oracle2 skins as far as I know.
I think you may be trying to run before you can walk really. First get to know UMC, Site Studio and ADF, then look at Site Studio SSXA and hopefully you will understand how/where skins can fit in.
Not trying to put you off but you have set quite a challenge to yourself
Tim

Calling UCM 11g web services with SSO

Hello, I have read the documentation about Single Sign-On in UCM 11G but I haven't understood how I could use SSO on UCM 11g web services calls.
The document I have read is
[http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15586_01/doc.1111/e10792/c03_security.htm]
and I only see info about SSO when using "Windows Native Authentication" (WNA).
I have to send soap calls from applications deployed in other application servers and use the SSO mechanism.
Does anyone knows how can I configure UCM and weblogic?
Thank you very much in advance!
Regards.

Hi ,
If you are looking to use the WSDL to execute ucm services then use SoapUI IDE on development , there it requires only the http authentication method .
Let me know if this is the actual requirement which you were looking for or if I have missed the point .
I use this to quickly test WSDL and verify if the service being invoked is actually correct or not .
Thanks,
Srinath
Edited by: Srinath Menon on Apr 26, 2013 11:32 AM

UCM 11g & IRM 11g integration

Hi All,
Can anyone explain the mechanism to integrate UCM 11g with IRM 11g? Even if you can provide pointers to relevant documentation, it would help. We have done integration on 10gr3 version of both products but not sure if same methodology will apply on 11g version too.
Any inputs to clarify this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

You need to contact the UCM product manager, Vijay Ramanathan, for scheduling information. I'm sure he'd be very interested in your plans.
Regards,
Frank.

UCM 11g with IRM 11g

hello ,
i need to know if i can configure ucm 11g with IRM server 11g ??
in 10g we have two components "**IRMIntegration IDC and IRMIntegration IBR** "
i dnt know if i need same components to do the same integration in 11g version ..

As I mentioned earlier, you would need to modify the Hot Folders application to do what you wanted. For example, I know of a customer who has had it modified so that the original creation date and author of the sealed file is unchanged from the original file. So this kind of modification is possible. You would also have to do extra modification to have UCM manage the document first (for example indexing the original and potentially creating extra renditions).
If you seal the documents individually and store them in UCM, you will not be able to full-text index them because a sealed file is a black box to UCM. Your indexing would be limited to user-supplied metadata fields only therefore (DATABASE.METADATA in UCM terms). There might be another method whereby you use something like the ZipRendition component to store the unsealed version of the file for full indexing, but I don't know enough about UCM to go into this deeply without doing some research.
Regards,
Frank.

Using archiver pointing to a clustered UCM 11g

Hello, I have to migrate content from UCM 10g to 11g but UCM 11g is in a Weblogic cluster. All UCM nodes use the same database schema and have shared filesystem for vault and weblayout. Where do I point the transfer of the archiver? Does it matter which of them the output provider uses to define the archive collection? Any ideas or recommendations?
Thank you very much in advance!
Regards.

Hi ,
It would need to be pointed to one of the UCM servers in the cluster so that it is a single point where the input is done . Since the cluster will all read the same weblayout / vault all the other nodes will be able to show / action on the contents .
Thanks
Srinath

Accounts in UCM 11g from external LDAP provider

Hi,
We are developing an application using UCM 11g. For authentication and authorization we are using external LDAP. Following are the steps followed to configure the UCM 11g for external LDAP.
1) Created User and Groups directory in LDAP
2) Created user and group in LDAP.
3) Assigned users to the groups.
3) Created accounts in group directory .Account name start with @ and ends with (RW)
4) Created a new provider in WLS.
5) Created a new JpsProvider in UCM.
Now, roles(groups in LDAP) and user are coming properly form LDAP. but the accounts are populating in UCM.
Can anybody tell me the solution for this problem
Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Nitin

In theory there is no limit, but as with most of the products and features inside the Content Server it comes down to design and size impacting performance.
So there is no simple answer.
The more complex answer is you need to try to keep things as simple as possible while still completing your goals.
For instance the Folders component in 11g is limited (hard coded) to 1000 files per folder maximum due to performance degradation if you put more in your folders. Many people just try to put more in and before the hard coded limit in 11g people did and their folders browsing became almost unusable due to slow browsing of the folder structure and files in side.
Similarly with Security we can impact performance with too many security groups, badly designed Roles to access security groups or badly designed Account structures. Notice I only said "too many" on Security groups but not "too many" on Accounts. You should try never to go above 25 security groups (this is not a hard coded limit just a best practice) and the "badly designed" part of roles and accounts can lead to bad performance and even broken security.
It comes down to DB performance, DB limitations and code limits.
First off be aware that there is a limit on how long a query in the DB can be. Commands and SQL in the DB are not endlessly long, there is a maximum number of characters. Keep that in mind as we go along into the next parts.
Second be aware that if you make a badly built query it will take a long long time.
Third be aware that when you are building security models in UCM these security structures go DIRECTLY to DB queries and remember the above 2 points.
So every search in UCM is a query when you take it back to the DB level, and every search requires a behind the scenes security check to make sure you can read the documents you are searching for. So any query built in the search interface gets an additional set of parameters automatically when executed (security).
So now we need to also think about your Metadata and not just the Security on that limited length DB back end. Do your users have 99 metadata fields (I hope not) and if they do do they use most of them while searching? How long will that query be before you add the security query?
Back to the security parts with accounts.
If you have your users having only a few roles providing only access to a small number of security groups and those same users only having a few accounts then searches will get a short security access query added since the number of additional checks for security are small. If the roles and group accesses and account accesses are very large (to the extreme limit) again this will be easy to make a short query due to the small number of excluded security roles and accounts.
BUT and this is a biggie. IF the users are given a number of roles and accounts that is middle of the road for number of total accesses then the query is as long as it can be and if the metadata is complex and large too then you may be running into the limit of Query string in the DB and your query may get truncated which results in a broken security model maybe.
That is not even talking about the efficiency of the query and how long it takes.....
Sorry for the book like reply to your simple question, but it really is not a simple question. :)

Howto install Related Content component on UCM 11g

Hi,
I did install URM 11g to test the Related Content component.
Does the component also work with UCM 11g. Are there any special metafields required?
Another problem is that I can't build the Related Content component, cause it is not listed in the URM ComponentWizard.
Greetings
Bodhy

Hi Bodhy,
Yes it does work with UCM 11g
It is a little hidden but can be installed as follows
Admin Server > Component Manager
In the first paragraph click on the link to advanced component manager
THen on the this page find the text
"If you really wish to modify URM components from this page, please click _here_. " and click the link
You should now find that the RelatedContent component can be enabled just for UCM.
Please mark this one as answered (if it works of course) as it may well be useful to other people looking for this hidden feature!
Tim

UCM 11g gives error while opening systemproperties in production

UCM 11g is giving error while opening systemproperties in production mode, it says root user cannot install it.Please suggest.

do you have any directories owned by root? I've seen some nfs issues change ownership of mounted directories when they're remounted.
is anything in the /bin/ directory owned by root?
I think you should be safe to chown back to your install user.
-ryan

Gett 403 error code when trying to access UCM 11g from Admin console -- deployment

We have deployed UCM 11g in cluster mode. When I test the application via the admin conssole --> deployment --> UCM. I can access UCM only on one member of the cluster. The other member gives me a 403 error code..

Please, take a look at https://blogs.oracle.com/proactivesupportWCC/entry/clustering_and_high_availability_for (and contact the support group as advised)

UCM 11g File missing from search result although file is accessable

When I do search without any criteria in UCM 11g, some files missing from search result although I know the files were checked into UCM already since I'm able to see these files using url similar to:
http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=GET_FILE&dID=12345
or use following url to get document information:
http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=DOC_INFO&dID=12345
the file is not in the search resule even search by ID.
also, the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
Is this a known problem? the same search was working in UCM 10 perfectly.
Thanks

The query seems able to retrieve the missing document. for example, I search by content ID, in the audit log (eanbled as you mentioned) give th efollowing information:
fusionappsattachments/6 09.13 06:22:03.878 IdcServer-3474 --- @ResultSet SearchResults ---
fusionappsattachments/6 09.13 06:22:03.878 IdcServer-3474 numFields=66,*numRows=1*,currentRow=0
also, the infomation following above give the deteail field information which match with the missing document.
I looks like UCM just did not bring it to UI as part of search result.
This seems match with my another finding as I mentioned earlier: the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
it seems query did find the documents but UI did not show it.
Not sure if this is a known bug.

Advance Folio Creation in UCM 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for