AFS ATP Problem

Hi All,
I'm having a problem right now with an AFS material that is promising against a purchase order that has already been fully promised against. Material 1000, grid C, has a PO in the system for 75 units. There are orders saved that total up to 75 units that have been promised against, and show up as T - Temporary assigned in the stock/requirement list. There is no 100-C stock showing in A - Available. However, when additional orders are placed, these orders are not giving a J0 rejection reason for insufficient stock - they will still show a full 75 units free to be promised against, and anything over 75 units will split and J0. I have checked the material master and the Availability check field is set to no lead time, which will cause the material to J0 when there is no available stock. We have used this same material in past seasons with different grids and have not seen this happen. Does anyone know what would cause this material do try and double-promise against this PO?
Thanks for any help!
J

Hey Padman,
I have a 2-D grid created for shirt sizes (collar size and sleeve length). That grid is assigned to a finished material w/ the AFS Status flag set.
However, when I do the MIGO transaction for the movement type 561 is specifies that I still need the size. The problem is, I do not receive the error message for a finished non-AFS materials. For example, a blank shirt, w/ no grid.
Regards,
Marat

Similar Messages

AFS - ATP "T" Status Problem

Hi All,
We're having a problem with ATP checks ignoring stock assigned to status T - Temporarily assigned stock/requirements, and double-promising against any quantity that hasn't been yet allocated to R - Reserved or F - Fixed.
For example, batch 0001 has 400 pieces allocated in F status, and 100 pieces unallocated and in A - Available status. If we enter Order 1 for 100 and save, this stock correctly moves from A to T. If another Order 2 is entered however, we are able to put up to 100 on the order and it will allow us to save. If we put 101, 100 will promise, and 1 will reject... when all 101 should reject, since 100 are already promised to Order 1 and we have no stock in A.
I cannot find anywhere in configuration where this T status is now being ignored by ATP checks. Thanks if anyone can help!
-J

US,
I suspect you may be dealing with a different issue. We are simply changing the J0 rejection to a different rejection code that won't be considered for ATP again when rescheduling is ran, since J0 is hardcoded to always take part during re-ATP.
As you probably know, J0 is set by the system if there's no availability for the item. If you want items without availability to take part in MRP I propose you either setup replenishment lead times on your materials and have your availability checking rule consider RLT, or you should have future receipts to confirm against, e.g. planned orders, production orders, etc. If you don't have sizing information yet you could use SLH methid 2 functionality.
I hope this was helpful.
Thanks!
Barend

How to solve this ATP problem

dear all,
wen i m creating the sales order i m getting this problem....
following is the error
The sum of the requested quantity exceeds the sum of stock items
Message no. VV041
Diagnosis
The availability check in your system is configured in such a way by the check group that, in addition to the ATP quantity calculation, an additional check is run on all available increases and decreases in stock.
During the availability check for Material TEST FINISH, the system determined when totaling the sum of stock increases and decreases that the sum of the confirmed quantities -                                               1.000 EA - exceeded the sum of stock increases -                                               0.000 EA -.
System Response
Either no further quantity can be confirmed or confirmed only after a check which includes replenishment lead time.
Procedure
Check the inventory/requirements situation of Material TEST FINISH and carry out back order processing or reschedule if necessary.
regards
subrat

Flat files is a spread sheet of materials and quantity in specified format.
Example
After STO created including PO in reference field, Process custom report for Flat files(EDI 945)
FLATFILE FORMAT
7500123456            200000000070CA5490870090
7500123456            200000000350CA8976578998
7500123456            200000000050CA7689689907
7500123456            30000000470000026236.2LB
7500123456 is STO created, 5490870090 is Material number, CA Mat Type. 200000000070 Qty.
After this process, Materials are added in STO as per qty mentioned in FLATFILE.
At this point when line items are added date is supposed to change as per previous material. But its showing date added.
Thank you,
Raj

/AFS/BAPI_MAT_BOM_MAINTAIN problem create other alternative

I have a report that create new bom, if create a new bom that don't have without alternative the bapi is ok and create BOm with alternative that i set in variant.
EX.
MATERIAL                       0CH5170
PLANT                          IT02
BOM_USAGE                      6
ALTERNATIVE                    3
After if i want create a new alternative with this value
MATERIAL                       0CH5170
PLANT                          IT02
BOM_USAGE                      6
ALTERNATIVE                    4
The bapi return this message
BOM already exists for 0CH5170 IT02 4
But this alternative don't exist.
if i go in transaction CS01 i can create this alternative without error.
Helppppppppp.

help.

Issue FV60

All,
I need a help to solv this problem ... i can´t change the content of table vbsegk because the table is standard. Somebody knows another way to make that.
Follow de description of problem sent to SAP.
Enviroment: ECC 5.0 with AFS.
Problem: After generate an error from an user-exit and save the park vendor invoice as completed using the transaction FV60 the code of the transaction saved in the table vbkpf-tcode is FBVB.
Process: The objective of this action is identify if the root of tax number of vendor is the same of the root of the tax number of the company before post an park vendor invoice using the transaction FV60.
For attempted this process was created an user-exit using a subtituition rule that occurs in the moment that the document is posted.
When the document is created with a number of vendor and before the post the user change this number e try to post, occurs the validation, if the new number of the vendor attempted the rule of the root of the tax number, the exit presents an error message to stop the processing of program.
Is necessary that the user save the document before post, but when the option save as completed is selected the transaction code is save different of the actual transaction in the table vbkpf in the field tcode.
When the user tries to access the document again, the document appears in another format in the transaction FBVB and there is an workflow (WS9000042) that access the document to do the post using call transaction to the transaction FV60.
Regards,
Roberto Aran

hi
Kindly check the table vbsegk for checking the document has got parked.
As soon as you post the parked document the entry will be moved to bseg table.
please check if the above is happening as you park and then post the vendor invoices.
thanks

How to create JCo to call R3 transaction

Hi Expert,
I am new to CRM Webshop. Can someone tell me whether it is possible to call R/3 transaction from JCo?
I need to call transaction /AFS/ATPS and display the screen to the user.
Thanks

You can not use JCo to call any R/3 (or another SAP) transactions. JCo, the Java Connector can only be used to call RFC function modules from any Java based application.
So, you can not "call transaction /AFS/ATPS and display the screen to the user" using CRM Webshop.

AFS Grid value problem

Hello,
After i create a sales order in va01, and want to change the quantity in va02 tcode. I select AFS ITEM and edit the quanity, after i save it and again enter using va02, in the grid value i.e., matrix entry all the items i entered is missing. And most of the times the quanitiy is doubling. i.e., if 500 units of shirts were entered in va01, here automatically it doubles. My client is facing this problem. Is there a SAP PATCH error??
Thanks in Advance.

Hello,
What's your AFS release ?
That's pretty strange, I know almost all AFS releases and never faced such an issue. I would recommend first to check whether a malicious user exit could be the cause of the error. If that's not the case, note that there is no available AFS features that deletes entered schedule line/grid value. Only reason for rejection can be automatically populated in sales order due to wrong grid value, ATP check...etc...
The last option will be to raise a customer note.
Best regards,
Mehdi

ATP Temporarily Assigned Stock Problem

Hi All,
We're having a problem with ATP checks ignoring stock assigned to status T - Temporarily assigned stock/requirements, and double-promising against any quantity that hasn't been yet allocated to R - Reserved or F - Fixed.
For example, batch 0001 has 400 pieces allocated in F status, and 100 pieces unallocated and in A - Available status. If we enter Order 1 for 100 and save, this stock correctly moves from A to T. If another Order 2 is entered however, we are able to put up to 100 on the order and it will allow us to save. If we put 101, 100 will promise, and 1 will reject... when all 101 should reject, since 100 are already promised to Order 1 and we have no stock in A.
I cannot find anywhere in configuration where this T status is now being ignored by ATP checks. Thanks if anyone can help!
-J

Also I forgot to note that we are running AFS.
Yes. There is an option in the availability check control configuration for "Include sales reqmts". If this is checked, ATP is supposed to take into account requirements generated by existing sales documents. We have it checked, but it is still ignoring these sales requirements.

After yesterday installing the latest itunes upgrade 11.1.5.5 my CD drive is no longer recognized. I do not have the file afs.sys on my computer which is supposed to cause the problem. Any ideas?

I yesterday installed the latest itunes upgrade to version 11.1.5.5. After doing so my computer no longer recognizes my cd drive Device manager states that windows cannot load the device driver, the device driver may be corrupted or missing. When I have tried to renew the driver it states the latest one is installed. I do not have the file afs.sys on my computer which is quoted as the file which causes optical drives to disappear. Any ideas

Hi, I've managed to get my CD & ipod working now but it wasn't easy. Maybe this will help you fix it.
This is what I did:
The problem: OS Windows 8.1 - was working ok with itunes (not sure which version). Upgraded to 11.1.5.5 and my old ipod stopped being recognised by itunes. As I had just bought a new ipod touch 5G I didn't pay too much attention however I soon realised that the new ipod wasn't recognised either. I uninstalled iTunes & reinstalled but that didn't fix it. I found a technote (see below) that says how to get get your ipod reconised. That worked but on a a reboot I realised that there was no CD drive appearing in windows.
It now works & this is what I did to fix it:
Went through the apple technotes on CD issues & looked a the Gear website
Looked for afs.sys file but didn't have that
The registry settings for device filters looked the same as the technotes
Device manager for CD said there were problems in the registry
I backed up the itunes folder (I was planning on a clean install & rebuilding itunes from scratch however most people want to keep their data)
I uninstalled itunes but that made no difference
I rolled back to the a system restore point that had been created not long before the upgrade to 11.1.5.5
The CD drive was now OK again
I went into Windows update and ran the updates that were available - one was for intel chipsets
I created a system restore point as a precaution
I found the registry key that is mentioned in the technotes to do with CD problems and device filters and backed it up separately as a precaution
I ran itunes (x64) 11.1.5.5
itunes asked me if I wanted to repair or uninstall - I uninstalled
I rebooted
I ran install for itunes 11.1.5.5
itunes installed ok & the CD was still there
ipods were not recognised
I followed the instructions http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1538 to update the driver
5. Verify that the Apple Mobile Device USB Driver is installed - For Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows 8
Update the Apple Mobile Device Driver
I now have a CD drive & iTunes recognises my ipod again - phew
Good luck

Problem sending IDOC DESADV /AFS/DELVRY03 to XI

Hi Gurus,
I have problems sending IDOCs DESADV (basic type /AFS/DELVRY03) created by function LSEND_IDOC to XI system. IDOC is correctly created by R3 system (AFS ECC 5.0) and correctly sent on the XI port (Status: Data passed to port OK - 03), but XI system doesn't receive IDOC.
If I resend the same IDOC by WE19 tcode goes ok!!
In R3 sending system nothing warnings/errors in syslog or sm58.
Any suggests? Thanks in advance.

Issue solved! It is necessary close the master idoc with a commit

ATP Stock on AFS item overview

I have the stock for specific material..but its not showing up in (AFS item overview) when i double click on Request delivery date in sales order create / change screen
and also i am not able to put the cursor on ATP stock field..
Could you pl let me know if there is any notes or corrections for this in VA01/02..we are doing AFS.
Thanks
Govi

Hello Govi,
Which release of AFS are you on ? have you checked on the material master if it has been enabled for ATP ?
Regards,
Arun

Problem with atp

Dear All,
I am trying to schedule interface using availabilty time planning(ATP).I have configured everything.I have given automatic start to communication channel.I enabled Active check box.I have set for one time with today's date and time.
Communication channel not started.I couldn't find what might be the error.how to find what's the problem?how to solve this?
any help would be appreciated.<<text removed>>
Cheers
Vinay
Edited by: Matt on Jul 6, 2011 2:28 PM

Hi,
Do one thing. Go to Visual Admin --> Locking Adapter --> Display locks tab and refesh the locks view.
--> Select the existing (hanging) enqueue lock .
--> Delete the lock.
-->Start the channel.
If still problem persist, please see the sap note: 1483974

AFS ship-to party problem in sale order

Hi!
We use AFS solution.
I use customer "0000087655" as sold-to party in sale order and try to set customer "0001000016" as ship-to party but get message
"Top node 0000087655 for ship-to 0001000016 not maintained or ship-to is not valid
Message no. 8W321"
How to Solve this error?
Thanks and Regards
Sureshkumar

Ensure that the ship to party 0001000016 is created with correct account group. Else change it via XD07.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Problem with ATP check in release of process order

Hi gurus,
I have next problem in automatic release of process order:
No checking group is maintained for product 000000000791104015, plant VFMX in matl master.
Situation:
I've some materials without MRP views in material master data but apparently this doesn't affect to release order. In this case, this material hasn't this views and it's impossible to release the order. I'm supposing the problem is not related with the fill up of this views or the field in material master data, because for other materials with the same situation the release is running.
Anybody has any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Regards

Dear ,
You are facing this error because :
- you have activated avaialbility check, but checkingb group is not maintained in material master of the component
- if maintained in material master, in configuraion checking group and checking rule combination is not maintained
- if above both are maintained then in the checking control for the order type is maintained, but in the control you maintained the setting that - release not possible if no availability, hence change it to user control option.
*So Goto MM02- material master -MRP3 view -Maintain the Availability check field as 01/02 as applicable for components in the production *
For more clarification , you can investigate the below : For production order avilablity check and release u have should following settings.
1. Define checking Group - SPRO
2. Define checking Rule- SPRO.
3. Define scope of check - OPJJ - Scope of the avilabilty check is defined for the Combination of Checking group and Checking rule. Check contol is defined for each comination of checking group and checking rule.
4.Define Chek control -OPJK : Checking rule is linked to Ordertype/Plant combination.
while releasing the production order system will do avilability check as per the settings In OPJK for ordertype/plant combination.
Hope this is clear to you
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 20, 2010 9:20 AM

Problem with ATP check.

Hello SAP Gurus,
While checking sales order in u201Cscope of checku201D the u201Cinclude purchase orderu201D button is checked. so could some please explain me this scenario, because my client can able to print the pick list for one delivery when the stock quantity is zero.
thanks
Sha

Hello,
Is there any way to stop the print pick list until the GR has been received for Pos but we want to create the delivery? Only we want to stop printing the pick list.
Because my client faced problem u2013 they print the pick list and informed to the customer that we are sending the material but my received the material one day later.
Please I need help asap.
Thanks
Sha

AFS ATP Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for