After duplicate operation, file sizes(Checkpoint file size) are different

HI
I have a some questions.
We are testing a 4-way Replication. After duplicate operation, file sizes(Checkpoint file size) are different in OS command(du -sh).
Is the normal?
TimesTen Version : TimesTen Release 7.0.5.0.0 (64 bit Solaris)
OS Version : SunOS 5.10 Generic_141414-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
[TEST17A] side
[TEST17A] /mmdb/DataStore # du -sh ./*
6.3G ./SAMPLE
410M ./SAMPLE_LOG
[TEST17A] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ls -lrt
total 13259490
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 501 Aug 14 2008 SAMPLE.inval
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091428864 Jan 29 02:13 SAMPLE.ds1
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4113014784 Jan 29 02:23 SAMPLE.ds0
[TEST17A] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ttisql sample
Command> dssize ;
PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 8388608
PERM_IN_USE_SIZE: 36991
PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 36991
TEMP_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 524288
TEMP_IN_USE_SIZE: 5864
TEMP_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 6757
[TEST17B] side
[TEST17B] /mmdb/DataStore # du -sh ./*
911M ./SAMPLE
453M ./SAMPLE_LOG
[TEST17B] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ls -lrt
total 1865410
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 334 Dec 11 2008 SAMPLE.inval
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:25 SAMPLE.ds1
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:25 SAMPLE.ds0
[TEST17B] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ttisql sample
Command> dssize;
PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 8388608
PERM_IN_USE_SIZE: 432128
PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 432128
TEMP_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 524288
TEMP_IN_USE_SIZE: 5422
TEMP_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 6630
[TEST18A] side
[TEST18A] /mmdb/DataStore # du -sh ./*
107M ./SAMPLE
410M ./SAMPLE_LOG
[TEST18A] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ls -lrt
total 218976
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:22 SAMPLE.ds0
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:32 SAMPLE.ds1
[TEST18A] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ttisql sample
Command> dssize;
PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 8388608
PERM_IN_USE_SIZE: 36825
PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 37230
TEMP_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 524288
TEMP_IN_USE_SIZE: 6117
TEMP_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 7452
[TEST18B] side
[TEST18B] /mmdb/DataStore # du -sh ./*
107M ./SAMPLE
411M ./SAMPLE_LOG
[TEST18B] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ls -lrt
total 218976
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:18 SAMPLE.ds1
-rw-rw-rw- 1 timesten other 4091422064 Jan 29 02:28 SAMPLE.ds0
[TEST18B] /mmdb/DataStore/SAMPLE # ttisql sample
Command> dssize;
PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 8388608
PERM_IN_USE_SIZE: 36785
PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 37140
TEMP_ALLOCATED_SIZE: 524288
TEMP_IN_USE_SIZE: 5927
TEMP_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER: 7199
Thank you very much.
GooGyum

You don't really give much detail on what operations were performed and in what sequence (e.g. duplicate from where to where...) nor if there was any workload running when you did the duplicate. In general checkpoint file sizes amongst replicas will not be the same / remain the same because:
1. Replicas are logical replicas not physical replicas. Replication transfers logical operations and applies logical operations and even if you try and do exactly the same thing at both sides in exactly the same order there are internal operations etc. that are not necessarily synchronised which will cause the size of the files to vary somewhat.
2. The size of the file as reported by 'ls -l' represents the maximum offset that has so far been written to in the file but the current 'usage' of the file may be less than this at present.
3. Checkpoint files are 'sparse' files (unless created with PreAllocate=1) and so the space used as reported by 'du' will in general not correspond ot the size of the file as reported by 'ls -l'.
Unless you are seeing some kind of problem I would not be concerned at an apparent difference in size.
Chris

Similar Messages

I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different. So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb. I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this?

I have a few hundred duplicates in my iPhoto library, but the file sizes are different. So one is 1.3mb and one is 567kb. I want to delete the smaller ones, but short of comparing each duplicate, is there a way to do this? I've been looking at Duplicate Annhilator but I don't think it can do it.
Thanks!

I just ran a test with iPhoto Library Manager, Duplicate Annihilator, iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner, Duplifinder and Photodedupo. I imported a folder of 5 photos into a test library 3 times, allowing iPhoto to import duplicates. I then ran the 5 photos thru resizer to reduce their jpeg compression but all other aspects of the file the same.
None of the duplicate removal apps found set that was reduced in the file resizer. That's probably due to the fact that the file creation date was being used as a criteria and the resized photo would have a different file creation date even though the Image Capture date was the same.
They all found the 3 regular duplicates and some of them would mark two and leave the 3rd unmarked. iPhoto Duplicate Cleaner can sort the found duplicates by file size but if the file was edited to get the reduced file size it might not be found as it would have a different file creation/modification date.
iPhoto Library Manage was able to find all duplicates and mark them as such if the file names were the same the the filename option was selected. Otherwise it also missed the modified, resized version. It allowed one to select the one photo to save before going to work on the library.
So if a photo has been reduced in image quality or pixel size it will not be considered a duplicate.
OT

File SIZES are Different ?

Hi Experts,
I have implemented ESR By pass Scenario.
The problem is we are getting the file sizes are differently in Source folder and Target folder
How can we resolve this issue
Please Guide Me
Thanks and Regards,
Ravi Teja.

Refer to question no. 2 under the below wiki and see if that configuration helps.
Sender File Adapter Frequently Asked Questions - Process Integration - SCN Wiki

Master database logical file names are different - Please Help!

Today I noticed that one of the server in our environment,
when i run
SELECT *
FROM sys.database_files
i got results
data_space_id name
1 master2
0 master_Log2
Please note logical name of the master database files.
But, in SSMS if i right click and choose properties for master database, it shows logical file names are master, mastlog.
How can this be happened? How can i fix this issue and make it both same names for master database?
Please help!

Today I noticed that one of the server in our environment,
when i run
SELECT *
FROM sys.database_files
i got results
data_space_id name
1 master2
0 master_Log2
Please note logical name of the master database files.
But, in SSMS if i right click and choose properties for master database, it shows logical file names are master, mastlog.
How can this be happened? How can i fix this issue and make it both same names for master database?
Please help!
Its nothing to worry about may be master was restored from backup which had logical file name as master2
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it
My Technet Wiki Article
MVP

Folder/ file icons are different sizes from one window to another!

Hi there
I am having an extremely annoying problem where all my folders and files (in icon view) are totally different sizes from each other from one window to another. For example, I might click on a folder that's icon is small sized (64x64), but when that folder opens up, the icons of the subfolders inside are huge (276x276) and need to instantly be resized and re-arranged. Then if i continue to open one of these subfolders, the file icons inside it are now medium sized (96x96). Each new folder that I go into on my hard drive will be differently sized and I end up spending ages resizing and re-arranging them before I can do my work. This problem never happened in Leopard and Im despairing of what to do.
Is there a way of setting a default icon size and spacing that can then be applied to every folder and file on the hard drive? I have used the 'Use as defaults' option on the 'View options' window but this doesn't apply it to anywhere else besides the current window you are on.
Surely, Im doing something wrong as Apple could never have overlooked such an obvious problem like this?
Can anyone advise?
Many thanks
Dan

The Finder will (theoretically) remember the view settings for each individual folder that you visit. If you have not opened a particular folder before, you should get the default view settings, but once you have changed the view then that is what you will get on subsequent visits. You can erase the previous settings by deleting the (normally invisible) .DS_Store file that is created in a folder when it is opened, but this file can contain other Finder metadata.

Copied Files To HDD - 'Get Info' File Sizes are different?

Hi All ---
-- not sure how to put it any other way.....maybe this is a normal thing?
I've copied 161.78Gigs of data from the P.B. to Lacie HDD but 'Get Info' on target disk is only reading 161.61Gigs - all files seem to be in place, seem to be copied, working etc --- but thats about 17megs of info missing somewhere?
Uh, what gives?
should i trash, and re-do the whole lot again? hmm.
thnx for any help in Adv ----
John W.

Hi Joe ---
Thanks for that - have been offline since yest. -- seems the main P.B. drive decided to go AWOL on me - but just overnight though? No clue whats going on there -- have repaired disk, permissions, run onyx, etc..... just didnt want to boot, occasionally would boot from Ext. HDD - Drive Icon vanished, all sorts of nonsense.... and then returned this a.m. as if nothing had ever happened.
I reckon HD is on its way out.... hmm.
I'm now getting lots of beachballs. v. boring. Everything is backed up externally TWICE now (& cloned Drive TWICE??) - onto two separate drives - am just going to erase, reformat P.B. before reinstalling 10.3 & 10.3.9 -- off to see a Doctor/Repairman tomorrow.
thanks for the link -- will def. have a go with that in the future.
Cheers,
J.

When I convert to word my doc formIng shifts and font sizes are different. What the problem

Any help with this?

Hi willscsu,
You may be running into trouble with the fonts used in the PDF file. As a test, would you please try converting the document from within Reader, and disable OCR following the instructions in this document: How to disable Optical Character Recognition (OCR) when converting PDF to Word or Excel.
Please let us know how that goes.
Best,
Sara

[Access right]File information are different between local a server storage

Good morning all,
We have serveral small issues and I am saking to my self 8and to you) if this can not have an impact.
My iMac have 3 partitions.
1) OS X 10.6.2
2) User's datas
3) Boot camp
All of my users use a network account and their Home are automounted. I means that we they save a file to their home, the file is saved into the server. This is the same for the /Library/Preferences/... .
I discovered some think interesting:
When I create and save a file, on loacl iMac, then I cmd+i (file info windows), under the sharing & Permission section, I can see my user name with read&write permission, *AND my user name is followed by "(me)"*
If I do exactely the same, but on a server folder, and then I pomme+i (cmd+i), the file info window, show me the same information, *but without the "(me)"*.
Some one could explain me what does that "me". Which impact it has, and frist all, *why that "me" does not appear on the server local while the network account are created on the server and not on local*
Many thank for your advise

Hello,
Someone has an idea about the (me).
To resume :
I have a file on my local laptop.
If I press cmd+i and I look at the "Share & Permission", I can see my user name followed by a : (me).
If that same file is syncronized to the file server, and I cmd+i on that file. Under the "sahre & permission", I still can see the same information, but excepted for my username, the (me) does not follow my user name any more.
Do you know why (me) is not displayed on remote files?
Thk

If same file name but file types are different, we should get only particular file type in search results.

Hi Team,
If filename is same for .doc and .pdf, only .pdf file should come in search results. For example, Attendee.doc, Attendee.pdf are available, we should get only .pdf in the search
results.
Please help us on this how to achieve.
Thanks,
Manjeera

Hi Manjeera,
I think you should use KQL / Managed properties, refer these links for more information -
use Property restriction queries in KQL and set filetype:pdf
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee558911.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff394509(v=office.14).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219630.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nadeemis/archive/2012/08/24/sharepoint-2013-search-rest-api.aspx
and these links -
Configure result sources for search in SharePoint Server 2013
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj683115.aspx
How To Customize SharePoint 2013 Search Results Using Query Rules and Result Sources
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/01/how-query-rules-and-result-sources-can-be-used-to-customize-search-results.aspx
Hope this helps!
MCITP: SharePoint 2010 Administrator
MCTS - MOSS 2007 Configuring, .NET 2.0
| SharePoint Architect | Evangelist |
http://www.sharepointdeveloper.in/
http://ramakrishnaraja.blogspot.com/

Is it possible to have same file size for different dpi?

I changed one.TIFF file (300dpi, 1024X1332) to .jpg files of four different dpi. But when I checked the four result jpg files, I found out that they are all in same file size and quality.( I also have checked the property of the files in the Windows.)
I think more DPI means more data and more file size. Am I wrong?
I use Photoshop CS 5.1(64bit, WINDOWS) - which is part of my Adobe Master Collection CS5.5.
TIFF(300dpi, 1024X1332) ->
1. JPG(72dpi, 1024X1332) : 306KB
2. JPG(108dpi, 1024X1332) : 306KB
3. JPG(144dpi, 1024X1332) : 306KB
4. JPG(600dpi, 1024X1332) : 306KB
I tested a few times more with different files. and same result comes out.(same file size for different dpi)
Thanks in advance.

Yes absolutely. Great observation. PPI does not control the number of pixels, just how big they are.
Now, if you change the PPI in the Image Size dialog with Resample checked.. then, that is a different story. In that case you will be changing the pixel dimension of an image (i.e.,changing the total number of pixels making up the image) while keeping its print size.
In your test files, you will notice all the print sizes are different, because all you were telling Photoshop to do was change the size of the pixels (if or when the image is ever printed), which is really just a bit of metadata of the file.

Spooling of a query generates different file sizes for different databases

Please help me regarding a problem with spooling. I spooled a query output to a file from two different database. In both the databases the table structure is the same and the output produced only one row. But the file size is different for the databases. How can this problem occur? Is there any database parameter need to be checked? Both the databases are in same version 10.2.0.1.0.
before running the spool i did a
sql> set head off feedback off echo off verify off linesize 10000 pages 0 trims on colsep ' '
on both the sessions.
In one database the filesize is *1463 bytes* and on the other the filesize is *4205 bytes*.
Please help me to find out these discrepancies.

hi Mario,
I think you are not getting my point. Both the files contain the same output but their sizes are different. This is due to the no of blank spaces between columns. I wanted to clarify why there is a difference between two filesize when the query output is the same.

Duplicate Script Files

Does anyone know how to combat the duplicate script files that are loaded, thus hurting the page load because of unnecessary HTTP requests. As an example, these two files are being loaded:
/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/LATEST/PTUtil.js
/plumtree/common/private/js/jsutil/334989/PTUtil.js
They are the exact same file, but because they have a different path, the browser has to load them both. Has anyone found a way to stop loading files from one of these locations?

It doesn't seem to happen within administration. Maybe you could try overriding the admin pages with the actual site content using javascript document.writes. That way users would go through the admin experience for all pages. You just need to make sure that you don't overwrite admin because then you won't be able to do anything. Make sure to recycle the app pool on the front end servers after you override admin. Also, the best way to do this is using a dynamic group experience definition. You can set it to be all of the users who don't not have access. Then set it to run at around 6pm or so which is right after the day ends so if anything changes throughout the day, everything will start working again the next morning. Hope this helps.

How do I remove duplicate attachment files in Mail

While looking in the Mail folder I have found numerous duplicate pdf files. Are these the attachments to a Email and can the dups be erased? Thanks, HJZ

You can manage what attachments are kept through Mail preferences. In Mail, click the Mail menu in the menu bar and choose Preferences. In the General tab, choose the option of your choice for the "Remove unedited downloads" option. (I personally use the "When message is deleted" option, although I believe the default is "Never"). Note that you might see duplicates because an identical attachment was included on multiple emails.

After copying a file from NTFS to HFS volume, file size changed when viewing in Windows

Hi guys,
I have a Mac Air running Mavericks on a HFS partition and Windows 7 on a BOOTCAMP NTFS partition. I have some files that I want to read/write from/to both systems. Since OS X can't write NTFS and Windows can't write HFS either, and I don't want to use any 3rd-party tools/drivers, I have to adopt a "stupid" way: in OS X, I copy those files from NTFS to its HFS partition, make changes, then switch to Windows and sync them back to NTFS.
The problem is, after I copied a file from NTFS to HFS in OS X, it seemed ok. But when I switched to Windows, the very copied file in HFS partition had its size changed (bigger) although I didn't make any changes to it in OS X yet. This happens to almost every file I copied, text and binary. For those text files, I tried to open it with EditPlus in Windows and EditPlus reports the correct size on the status bar.
How could this happen?

I am not sure if this is what your seeing but...
The same unaltered file on two different volumes might use different amounts of disk space. This is because a 'disk' is divided in to 'blocks' and a block (also historically known as a 'sector') is a certain minimum size. So if disk-1 has a block size of 512 bytes and disk-2 has a block size of 1024 bytes then a file containing just 10 bytes will use up twice as much space on disk-2 as disk-1 even though it is the exact same file.
Beyond that, Macs can add additional information like Spotlight tags, labels, icons, etc. which make a file bigger. If you are modifying a file then presumably that also implies adding additional content e.g. for a Word document more text and this will make it bigger. Also depending on some programs are configured or designed 'deleting' text may only mark it as deleted and not really delete. This can apply to older versions of Word which has a 'Fast Save' feature, new versions have removed this and do a proper delete.
You would have to give more details like what you are doing to the document, what kind of document, and what the two sizes are.
Finally, there is one other potential difference, some systems and manufacturers use 1024 as a unit for measuring file and disk sizes, some use 1000. It will be the same number of bytes in each case but 1000 bytes in one case would exactly equal 1MB, and in the other it would be 0.9765MB.

Stage Area Size is 38 gb after extracting zip file of oracle R12.1.1

Dear All,
I need verification from you that after extracting zip file I have total size 38 gb after extracting zip file of oracle R12.1.1 for solaris 5.1 sparc 64 bit.
I have downloaded 42 files.
B53824-01 Part 1 of 4      29M
     B53824-01 Part 2 of 4      97M
     B53824-01 Part 3 of 4      393M
     B53824-01 Part 4 of 4      81M
     V15635-01 Part 1 of 3      1.2G
     V15635-01 Part 2 of 3      1.2G
     V15635-01 Part 3 of 3      1.1G
     V15636-01      976M
     V15637-01 Part 1 of 3      1.7G
     V15637-01 Part 2 of 3      1.7G
     V15637-01 Part 3 of 3      576M
     V15638-01 Part 1 of 3      1.6G
     V15638-01 Part 2 of 3      1.7G
     V15638-01 Part 3 of 3      557M
     V15639-01 Part 1 of 3      1.6G
     V15639-01 Part 2 of 3      1.6G
     V15639-01 Part 3 of 3      463M
     V15640-01 Part 1 of 3      1.5G
     V15640-01 Part 2 of 3      1.6G
     V15640-01 Part 3 of 3      514M
     V15641-01 Part 1 of 3      1.2G
     V15641-01 Part 2 of 3      1.6G
     V15641-01 Part 3 of 3      756M
     V15642-01      1.0G
     V15643-01 Part 1 of 7      567M
     V15643-01 Part 2 of 7      560M
     V15643-01 Part 3 of 7      593M
     V15643-01 Part 4 of 7      612M
     V15643-01 Part 5 of 7      582M
     V15643-01 Part 6 of 7      480M
     V15643-01 Part 7 of 7      551M
     V15644-01 Part 1 of 2      1.5G
     V15644-01 Part 2 of 2      1.6G
     V15645-01      1.7G
     V15646-01 Part 1 of 3      1.5G
     V15646-01 Part 2 of 3      1.2G
     V15646-01 Part 3 of 3      1.1G
     V15647-01 Part 1 of 3      1.7G
     V15647-01 Part 2 of 3      1.2G
     V15647-01 Part 3 of 3      626M
     V15648-01 Part 1 of 2      1.2G
     V15648-01 Part 2 of 2      836M
Does these have all basice needs.
There is also some files which I did not download may be for soa ,warehouse and library like.
Please verify that am I going on right?
Thanks

I need verification from you that after extracting zip file I have total size 38 gb after extracting zip file of oracle R12.1.1 for solaris 5.1 sparc 64 bit.
I have downloaded 42 files.
Does these have all basice needs.You need the following files:
From: Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 Rapid Install Start Here (Part 1 of 4), Part Number: B53824-01 Part 1 of 4
To: Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12.1.1 for Sun Solaris SPARC (64-bit) Rapid Install APPL_TOP - Disk 3 (Part 2 of 2), Part Number: V15648-01 Part 2 of 2
There is also some files which I did not download may be for soa ,warehouse and library like.
Please verify that am I going on right?You do not need to download those files.
Thanks,
Hussein

After duplicate operation, file sizes(Checkpoint file size) are different

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for