ALE filters with transactions BD64 and BD21

I've created a filter for MATMAS IDOCs in my Distribution Model with BD64.
I expected it to create an IDOC when a material in a specific plant is changed (change pointers are active).
However, when I run transaction BD21 (RBDMIDOC) it still send ALL materials that have changed.
Any idea what I'm doing wrong.

After reading your message, I ran BD11.
Is that the transaction I should run to distribute the IDOCs.
I'm new to working with these transactions and I haven't done this before.
The system generated some MATFET idocs. But they have a failure status.
What I really wanted to do was prevent the generation of the MATMAS idoc in the first place.
Do I have to write a user exit for that?

Similar Messages

Movement Types associated with Transactions WAE01 and WAM01

Hello,
What is the best way to find Movement Types associated with transactions WAE01/02 and WAM01/02?
Thanks,
Shweta

Hi Shweta,
Pls refer below links may be use full to you!!!!!
[http://www.sapwm.com/posting_changes.asp]
The is one book also i have seen on SAP press related to it named "SAP Warehouse Management: Functionality and Technical Configuration " by Martin Murray.
[http://www.sap-press.de/katalog/buecher/inhaltsverzeichnis/gp/titelID-1449]
Hope will be useful to you!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Regards,
Shyamal

Problem with transaction CUNI and configuring decimal places

Note: I'm actually an ABAP programmer and do not know almost anything about SAP configuration.
Note2: Sorry if this was posted in the wrong section. I am trying to avoid an ABAP solution so I did not post this in the ABAP section.
Note3: Sorry for cross posting. I'm trying to make this visible to as much experts as possible.
\[Problem\]
I'm tasked to increase the number of decimal places that a certain standard program in MM accepts.
\[ABAP solution I'm trying to avoid\]
The consultants' initial recommendation was to make Z copies of the standard table and the standard programs that references that table. This would be rather dangerous as there is the risk of missing certain parts of the code If I was to replace all occurences of the old standard table with my custom Z table.
\[Standard solution I'm trying to do\]
Now I've read several threads here that makes use of transaction CUNI to adjust decimal places of certain units of measure (see Re: Unit Of Measure problem and change decimal places in PO quantity). However, when I tried it, It does not work the way I expect it to.
In SE11, I created a custom table that has a quantity field (length: 13, decimals: 3) and a unit field (length 3)
In CUNI, I created a new ISO code TST (for test). Then I created a new Unit of measure ZTT (ZTesT) which makes use of my ISO code TST. I set the decimal places to 6.
When I insert data into my custom table, instead of 6, the number of decimal places remain at 3.
Please help in adjusting decimal places without touching the table.

Hello Dzed,
I've read several posts that suggest transaction CUNI to adjust decimal places in standard unit of measures. What I tried is a simplified simulation of what is needed.
In a more realistic sense, consider table VBRP and column FKIMG. What If I want to store items in VBRP and allow 6 decimal places for FKIMG but I am not allowed to modify the table? Is making a Z copy of VBRP the only solution? Or is there a more standard way of doing this?
My worry is that If I copy a table, I also need to copy the programs that use it and modify them accordingly. Our Basis do not want the standard tables touched.
Kyle

Filtering with a gallery and 2 radio buttons

Hello,
I am trying to display a gallery of items that is getting filtered 3 different times.
the first filter is Gallery9 which has two choices, the second filter is a radio box called Radio1 with 6 different selections and the third is another radio box called Radio1_1 that has 5 different choices.
I want to filter the results Gallery9, Radio1, and Radio1_1 with the end result being a gallery of 3 items. The table I have all this info stored on is called SommFinal
sam k

Hi Sam,
The Filter function can take multiple conditions (please refer to the
documentation for more information)
I will assume that in your scenario SommFinal has 3 columns
Column1, Column2 and Column3. And that the Gallery9 is bound to a Table that has a
Column that can be used to filter Column1, Radio1
will have values matching Column2 and Radio1_1 values matching
Column3.
The formula for the Items property of Gallery3 would become:
Filter(SommFinal, Column1=Gallery9!Selected!Column, Column2 = Radio1!Selected!Value, Column3 = Radio1_1!Selected!Value)

Dunning with transaction FPVA and FPVB

Hello,
who has experience with the mentioned transactions ? I understood from the documentation that these transactions are only used in the Industry Solution Utilities ?? And that in the Centeral ERP system F150 must be used for dunning?
We want to create dunning forms with Adobe, but we have already some company codes in the system who are using Smart Forms. Is it possible to use different forms for the dunning output ?

Thanks Prabu.
I've checked tha data I pass to the BDC table and they are correct. I run in visible mode and I`ve verifyed this.
One thing ... My recording stops when I confirm the execution of the job, so I can`t verify the status of job after this step.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Using SO_OBJECT_SEND with Transaction code and IDOC number

Hi All - from within the inbound_idoc_orders FM - when an idoc errors I want to generate a sap office document (with more verbage than workflow, so that is why a sap office doc) and with SO_OBJECT_SEND - but I want to be able to pass the idoc number and either Tcode VA01 or FM of inbound_idoc_orders - so that user can usee doc execute menu path and be launched into VA01 with the idoc data...
We do this today with VA01 and the sales order number - here is different in I want to pass the idoc number so that data can be used....
I did this prior but one system referesh flushed the code ... Thanks for the help - Janet

Hi All - from within the inbound_idoc_orders FM - when an idoc errors I want to generate a sap office document (with more verbage than workflow, so that is why a sap office doc) and with SO_OBJECT_SEND - but I want to be able to pass the idoc number and either Tcode VA01 or FM of inbound_idoc_orders - so that user can usee doc execute menu path and be launched into VA01 with the idoc data...
We do this today with VA01 and the sales order number - here is different in I want to pass the idoc number so that data can be used....
I did this prior but one system referesh flushed the code ... Thanks for the help - Janet

Problems with the batch in transaction MB1A and MB21

Hi everybody, I am new in the MM module. I am having a problem with transaction MB1A and MB21, when i try to select a batch for the movement 901. if i click the match code for the material's batch, the system shows me all the batches for the material, but some of these batches don't have available quantity stock and order creates the reservation or the material output. The system dont allow negative stock. Do you have any idea of this problem? Regards.

Hi,
In IM, when you select a batch with possibile entries, system always shows the available batches no matter whether stock is there are not.
However, if you setup batch determination strategy for example, when you are processing in MB1A, SAP fills the batch based on the criterion you define in:
MBC1Logistics -->Materials Management -->Inventory Management -->Environment -->Batch Search Strategy -->MBC1 - Create
Select appropriate strategy (if defined in your system, say for mvt ty)
maintain search strategy and sort criteria for your movement type here.
Hope this helps!

While trying to change a BOM with transaction CS02, a runtime error appears

While trying to change a BOM with transaction CS02, a runtime error appears.
In intial screen he entered material ,plant BOM usage and date valid from after executed then id displayed item list in that he wantu2019s delete one item, he has been deleted selected item after that when he was saving he is getting runtime error
Developer trace
ABAP Program SAPLKED1_WRITE_CE4_BPS1                 .
Source LKED1_WRITE_CE4_BPS1U01                  Line 30.
Error Code SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC.
Module $Id: //bas/640_REL/src/krn/runt/absapsql.c#17 $ SAP.
Function HandleRsqlErrors Line 775.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_STDERR completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_ERROR entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_ERROR completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_CLOSE entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RFC_CLOSE completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_IMC_ERROR entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_IMC_ERROR completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_DATASET_CLOSE entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_DATASET_CLOSE completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_SHMLOCKS entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_RESET_SHMLOCKS completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_SAVE entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_SAVE completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_TPDA entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_ERROR_TPDA completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_RUDI entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_PXA_RELEASE_RUDI completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_LIVE_CACHE_CLEANUP entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_LIVE_CACHE_CLEANUP completed.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_END entered.
RABAX: level LEV_RX_END completed.
RABAX: end RX_RFC
In sm21
Perform rollback
Run-time error "SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC" occurred
     Short dump "090618 110101 donalda 11557 " generated
Runtime Error          SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC
Exception              CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB
       Occurred on     18.06.2009 at   11:01:01
The ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert results in duplicate database records.
What happened?
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "SAPLKED1_WRITE_CE4_BPS1" had to be terminated because
one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
What can you do?
Print out the error message (using the "Print" function)
and make a note of the actions and input that caused the
error.
To resolve the problem, contact your SAP system administrator.
You can use transaction ST22 (ABAP Dump Analysis) to view and administer
termination messages, especially those beyond their normal deletion
date.
Error analysis
An exception occurred. This exception is dealt with in more detail below
. The exception, which is assigned to the class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was
neither
caught nor passed along using a RAISING clause, in the procedure
"RKE_WRITE_CE4__BPS1" "(FUNCTION)"
Since the caller of the procedure could not have expected this exception
to occur, the running program was terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
If you use an ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert to insert a record in
the database and that record already exists with the same key,
this results in a termination.
(With an ABAP/4 Open SQL single record insert in the same error
situation, processing does not terminate, but SY-SUBRC is set to 4.)
How to correct the error
The exception must either be prevented, caught within the procedure
"RKE_WRITE_CE4__BPS1"
"(FUNCTION)", or declared in the procedure's RAISING clause.
To prevent the exception, note the following:
Use an ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert only if you are sure that none of
the records passed already exists in the database.
You may able to find an interim solution to the problem
in the SAP note system. If you have access to the note system yourself,
use the following search criteria:
"SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC" CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DBC
"SAPLKED1_WRITE_CE4_BPS1" or "LKED1_WRITE_CE4_BPS1U01"
"RKE_WRITE_CE4__BPS1"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself, please send the
following documents to SAP:
1. A hard copy print describing the problem.
   To obtain this, select the "Print" function on the current screen.
2. A suitable hardcopy prinout of the system log.
   To obtain this, call the system log with Transaction SM21
   and select the "Print" function to print out the relevant
   part.
3. If the programs are your own programs or modified SAP programs,
   supply the source code.
   To do this, you can either use the "PRINT" command in the editor or
   print the programs using the report RSINCL00.
4. Details regarding the conditions under which the error occurred
   or which actions and input led to the error.

Hi ,
you are getting beacuse u are trying to do mass update to database.
Please check that below note are applicable to your system.
Note 453313 - DBIF_RSQL_ERROR_INTERNAL for mass insert
Note 869534 - AFS MRP doesn't work properly with all BOM item categories
Thanks Rishi Abrol

Mail with PO doc and link document iwhile using output type 7 - Urgent

Hi all,
I'm facing a problem for my customer.
I need to send a mail with the PO forms and all link document of each item .
This mail have to be send to several user maintain with transaction MN05 and user want to change the recipient of the mail in MESSAGE Screen of PO so we try to use output type 7 which allow this modification .
Unfortunatly, with this output type i can't add by abap code document in the mail .
Does somebody face the same problem or add a solution to retrieve all recipient define by the user ?
Best regards.

Requirement Cancel

Problems with transaction CJ20N

Hello Experts,
I have created a tooling asset with transaction AS01 and I have some problems with transaction CJ20N.
I would like to know how can we Link the Asset already created with the WBS by transaction CJ20N.
Thanks
Ferdaws

Hi Ferdaws,
In the asset master (AS02) you can maintain the WBS element in Time Dependent data.
For maintaining the WBS element in asset master, first you have to make WBS element optional entry in Screen Layouts for Asset master data.
Kindly check with this.
Best Regards,
Vasu.

SAP GUI 7.10 rev 1 for OSX and WIN XP with transaction MIGO

Hello,
When I start transaction MIGO and MIGO_GR, with SAP GUI 7.10 rev 1, I only get a blank screen.
I've tried it in OSX 10.4.9, OSX 10.5.1 and Windows XP, all with the same result.
SAP GUI 7.10 gives the correct screen.
Do you have a solution for this ?

Hi John,
I can reproduce what you are describing. Looks like this problem has been introduced as a side effect of a change for solving another issue
We are going to look into that. In case you want to be able to track the process and get a notification when the fix is available, please create a [support message|https://service.sap.com/message] on component BC-FES-JAV with the description you have posted here.
Best regards
Rolf-Martin

IDOC and ALE Configuration with cross application with SD

Hi Sap Gurus,
Please send me some document on IDOC and ALE Configuration with cross application with SD.
Please send me the material on my mail id [email protected]
Regards
shekhar

Dear Shekhar,
concerning EDI concept in SD: the EDI concept is intended to realize the sales and distribution process completely automatically with the help of electronical documents. These documents are sent from one customer to another, are processed mostly on the background and give a possibility to realize the sales process extremely efficiently.
If MM-customer would like to purchase the goods then he creates the IDOC of type ORDERS and send it to SD-customer. On the SD-side the IDOC is processed via the function module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS and creates the sales order. As confirmation the SD-side can send to MM-side the Order-Response IDOC (function IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS). The MM-customer can every thime send a change to the existiong order, then on SD side the ORDCHG IDOC will be processed. It can change the order like in VA02. The creation of the invoice can be made via IDOC of message type INVOIC (function IDOC_OUTPUT_INVOIC).
So, the process can be realized completely automatically between SD and MM partners with the help of IDOCs: ORDERS, ORDCHG, ORDRSP, INVOIC.
That's all concerning the SD-EDI.
Additional processes in SD, where EDI are used:
1) application of delivery schedules to the scheduling agreement: IDOC of type DELINS
2) creation of a delivery order to the scheduling agreement: IDOC of type DELORD
3) creation of external agent service delivery to scheduling agreement: IDOC of type EDLNOT
4) creation of credit advice / credit memo in the frames of self-billing: IDOCs of type GSVERF, SBWAP and for external invoice creation SBINV.
It is all processes which are realized in the SD module via EDI.
I hope this info helps.
Kind regards,
Akmal Vakhidov
Development Support SAP, Walldorf/Germany

Problems with ALE filters...

Hi I have a situation I need to send materials to a partner only the materials specific for a particular plant.The filter in the distribution model is based on E1MARCM-WERKS.
change pointers are enabled.When material is changed may be some other fields which are not relevant to plant data the idoc is created with message function '018'(resend) and the E1MARCM segment itself is missing.So the filters are not verified and the materials which belong to other plants are also sent to the partner...
How can this problem be rectified...?
Thanks for your help
Larry

Hi Aber,
I have an wague idea, can't we put a condition like if WERKS is not initial or if WERKS = 'your filter value'. If any of these case is correct, it will stop sending the idocs.
shylesh

Can message filters cause messages with blank subject and 1969 dates

I have done many things to try to trace why I get messages with blank subjects and 1969 dates.
downloaded TB
created all new folders
moved only persdict and msfFilterRules to the new profile.
At this try
set the option NOT to download messages on startup
went off line and compacted all folders.
emptied the inbox and all subfolders.
Exited TB.
deleted all files under pop.verizon.net except msgFilters rules.
Deleted all msf files for local folders in my profile.
opened TB.
a few times
--With Firefox went to verizon webmail and moved a few messages to the Verizon inbox.
--moved to TB window
-- Clicked <get messages>
-- still received blank messages with 1969 dates
-- deleted those messages
-- emptied trash
went to the filter rules and unclicked all filters that send files to local folders
left 2 rules in place
(1) if a sender was in my address list send the message to inbox folder called "Known sender"
(2) if the subject was NOT a weird string like "&*%$@!+=?><" send the message to inbox folder called "Suspicious" This filter is because there is not an ELSE function in TB it is extremely unlikely that a message would have such a subject.
[These two filters should move all messages except junk to the two folders.]
I then tried the above procedure of going to Verizon, moving messages to Verizon Inbox, etc. a few times.
I did NOT get the messages with blank subject and 1969 date!!
Questions:
(1) Is this just a fluke?
(2) From understanding the internals of TB is it reasonable that some now-unchecked message filter(s) had caused there to be the oddball messages?
(3) if It is a filter rule, how can I find out which one it is?

I looked though all the condition specification options I do not see how using header info in a condition specification would '''change '''the header info.
I looked at the possible actions on filters.
I only see "tag" and "Star" as ones that might change header info.
However, I found out that when I unchecked the first 17 of 19 filters and just had the two I explained above I would sometimes get a message with the 1969 date.
Since then I deleted those two rules and made new versions and moved them to the bottom where the earlier versions had been. I have not had the 1969 messages since!!
I have put a new filter at the top of the list that checks whether the date is before 1/1/971. If teh date is before 1/1/1971 the filter tags the message as important and moves it into the inbox folder named "Suspicious".
I have not seen any 1969 messages since then.
Since the problem was intermittent and because I was not able to create conditions whereby The 1969 dates would or would not occur, the problem may not be 'fixed'. I'll watch it for a while
Meanwhile, I'll continue to manually go though the webmail on Verizon and as a test only download mail that I do not want to save for the long term. Messages I want to keep I'll move messages I want to keep for the long term into foldrs on Verizon. '''If '''after a while, I do not get any more of the 1969 messages, I'll move messages I want to keep into the Verizon inbox and download them into TB

When I save a filtered photo from my iphone (filtered with "Tonal") onto my desktop into iPhoto, the filter dissappears and its saved as a standard color photo. Is there a reason why and way I can save it as is?

When I save a filtered photo from my iphone (filtered with "Tonal") onto my desktop into iPhoto, the filter dissappears and its saved as a standard color photo. Is there a reason why and way I can save it as is?

The reason is that Apple screwed up and despite threads for this issue dating back several months, there is no fix. It's outrageous -- a dozen or so photos that I just took got completely screwed up because of this. There isn't even a way to replicate the effects in iPhoto without major guesswork and tweaking.
I mean this isn't even something that should be an issue. How Apple thought that a user would want his filters to disappear is beyond me. I mean it's so absolutely counterintuitive that I'm baffled that such a destructive 'feature' could've made it through.
So much for Apple's quality control! They'll forever say it's intentional and part of the 'lossless' design where the effects aren't permanently applied, but there should be an option. Some users want their filters to stay when they take them.
In fact, ALL USERS WANT THE FILTERS TO STAY.

ALE filters with transactions BD64 and BD21

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for