Aliasing domain names

I'm trying to create an alias of a domain name. That is <anyname>@a.com is the same mailbox as <anyname>@b.com. I was trying to use Delegated Administrator to set this up. In the DA interface, there is a box under root->a.com (menu)->organizations->Organization Properties->Domain Information there is a field called: "Alias Names for Domain". I set this to "b.com". I'm assuming this is supposed to be a domain alias.
This seems to map into the ldap schema as: associateddomain: b.com
However, when I send mail, it doesn't go through. Instead I get:
05-Feb-2009 13:09:20.52 tcp_intranet JES 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]
My main question is the "Alias Names for Domain" supposed to work as I expect, or is it there to do something else.
I am able to make it work if I set up a user alias in DA. That in, in DA, for user [email protected], I set 'Email Aliases:' to [email protected] Then mail to [email protected] works.
Thanks!
bash-3.2# ./imsimta version
Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 9 2008)
libimta.so 7.0-3.01 64bit (built 09:24:13, Dec 9 2008)
bash-3.2# ./commadmin -vV Delegated Administrator 6.4-3.01 (B2008-10-22)

jandrusiak wrote:
I'm trying to create an alias of a domain name. That is <anyname>@a.com is the same mailbox as <anyname>@b.com. I was trying to use Delegated Administrator to set this up. In the DA interface, there is a box under root->a.com (menu)->organizations->Organization Properties->Domain Information there is a field called: "Alias Names for Domain". I set this to "b.com". I'm assuming this is supposed to be a domain alias.
This seems to map into the ldap schema as: associateddomain: b.com
However, when I send mail, it doesn't go through. Instead I get:
05-Feb-2009 13:09:20.52 tcp_intranet JES 0 [email protected] rfc822; [email protected] 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: [email protected]
My main question is the "Alias Names for Domain" supposed to work as I expect, or is it there to do something else.
I am able to make it work if I set up a user alias in DA. That in, in DA, for user [email protected], I set 'Email Aliases:' to [email protected]. Then mail to [email protected] works.
There is two methods to create a domain alias. The first is an MTA-level domain rewrite rule which rewrites the envelope recipient address from <something>@b.com => <something>@a.com. This approach is much quicker to implement in the short term but has the disadvantage of limited flexibility i.e. users are "forced" to have the email alias.
To achieve this domain alias you add the following rewrite rule to your imta.cnf file:
b.com      $E$F$U%a.com@localhostThe second method is the one that you already started to implement. That method is to assign the alias domain (b.com) to a specific user/group schema 2 branch by adding "associateddomain: b.com". Then for each user who needs to have the alias, add an entry to their Email Aliases (mailalternateaddress:).
The advantage of the second method is that you only have to assign an email alias to those users who want/need it. Also if the user has [email protected], there is no reason why they have to have [email protected], you could assign them [email protected] instead.
I recommend you continue with the second method.
Regards,
Shane.

Similar Messages

  • Domain name/"primary DNS" name/mail host name/mail server name/mx name

    Hi,
    I have registered my domain name (N.com) with an external dns server and created an MX record (mail.N.com) for it as well. My server sits behind a router and internet traffic is port(80)-forwarded to my server's fixed internal ip address (I can access my webpages from the internet just fine). When I initially setup the server I was asked to give it a "primary DNS name." I naturally assumed that N.com was supposed to be entered here, but that just caused all kinds of problems (though I still do not understand why). So I reinstalled and currently have server.N.com as the primary DNS name of the server (although it shows up in Server Admin and Workgroup Manager as server.local--why is that?)
    I have had no luck getting any email from the internet with the default settings in mail services (domain name of N.com and host name of server.N.com). Having no luck with the defaults, I assumed that maybe I needed to change the host name to "mail.N.com" so that it matched the MX record. I also changed the user preferences in Workgroup Manager to receive mail from mail.N.com--but still no luck. Could someone tell me what I am doing wrong and how come none of the Mail Service literature mentions anything about what a mail "host name" is supposed to be? Is it supposed to be the same as the "Mail Server" name that Workgroup Manager asks each user for? and is it the same as the MX record name?
    I am just needing some help to connect all these variously named, but undefined, dots.
    Also, how come I can access webmail from the internet using www.N.com/webmail but can't do it from any computers within my physical network (I have to use IPaddress/webmail or server.local/webmail)?
    Also, should my user email addresses be [email protected] or [email protected] (which is the current default)?
    Thanks in advance and good luck!
    John

    I had been told by a friend that ... regular email coming in from the internet would go through port 80
    Unfortunately you were misinformed.
    My MX record needs the extra subname (such as "mail") in front of the domain name, right?
    Not at all. A MX record for 'N.com' is entirely valid (expected, in fact).
    An MX record tells remote mail servers where to send mail for any domain/subdomain. If you think about it, let's say you worked for Apple and you wanted people to be able to send email to [email protected], well then you need an MX record for 'apple.com'.
    You can see if you dig MX apple.com that they actually have 9 MX records, but the point still stands.
    Now, you might also have MX records for subdomains so that you can have [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], etc. Each of these subdomains would need a separate MX record.
    So, in general, for any set of email addresses @[anything.]domain.com you have a MX record telling remote mail servers where to send that mail.
    Of course the MX record name is mail.N.com, but I think you are implying that the in the Mail settings of Server Admin where it asks for domain name all I need to put there is the N.com, right?
    What I mean is that you need to set the domain name to whatever domain name you expect to receive mail at.
    If you want users to have email addresses in the form of [email protected], then you enter 'N.com'.
    If you want users to have email addresses in the form of [email protected] then you enter 'mail.N.com'.
    If you want both forms, enter one in the main domain and add the other(s) in the Advanced -> Hosting -> Local Host Aliases section.
    Is there anything in the Mail settings that needs to have the full MX record name (mail.N.com)?
    Yes. Either the 'domain name' or the 'Local Host Aliases' needs to contain the same thing as your MX record. That's because the MX record tells remote servers to send mail to this machine, but the machine won't accept the mail unless it is configured to do so.
    What is the "host name" supposed to be?
    This should be the name that remote servers see when this machine tries to send outgoing mail.
    Ideally this should match the reverse DNS of your IP address, that way when it connects to a remote server it says "Hi, I'm $hostname" and the remote server can lookup the machine's IP address and see the same result. This will reduce the problem of remote servers thinking you're sending them spam.
    If you only have a single IP address then this probably needs to be something like 'N.com'. If you don't have control over your reverse DNS then you're going to run into a problem.
    Also in the user accounts (in Workgroup Manager) what should the "mail server name" be? Is it the host name or the domain name?
    Off hand, I don't know.
    Also, why are all the default user email addresses [email protected] (the name I gave the server at setup)? Why doesn't the user accounts create [email protected] as the default address?
    Presumably because the mail server says it is 'server.N.com' and therefore any accounts on that machine would be [email protected]. Changing the domain name (as above) should fix that.

  • Web Domain Name Question??

    So this is going to sound really noobie like...well because I'm not really a network admin by day.
    I have my server set and functioning with DNS, Web, OD, and a mixture of file sharing services. So...when creating a new Site in Web service, I set a 'Domain Name' (like www.example.com) and 'Aliases' (like example.com). If I then go to a web browser and type "www.example.com" or "example.com" I get nothing...but, if I type in the FQDN of the server (like "http://ns1.mydomain.com"), it will go to my site.
    Now, I know that the domain I'm setting isn't a registered domain, but with all of my client computers pointing to the DNS of the server, shouldn't it resolve to be like a 'local host' kinda thing?
    I don't need this to be live to the internet...just a local site. Any help or suggestion is much appreciated!
    Thank you!!

    Hi Corey
    To put it simply you really don't need any other IP address in the Server's DNS Server's field other than its own address. Of course this assumes the server is also the DNS Server. The Server in effect is using its own DNS to resolve itself locally and any client computers that are using it for their DNS as well as accessing the internet. Obviously clients using the Server for their DNS will also be accessing the internet using the Server.
    If the Server is down then it won't matter whether if it can get on the internet - its down. For clients using the server it will matter. So for clients you could either not bother using the Server and use either the Router IP address (if the router is not your server) or any ISP supplied DNS Server addresses. Or place these addresses as secondary addresses.
    A lot depends on how you want clients to access server hosted domains? If you want to use domain names then clients have to know which DNS Server resolves that name to an IP address. Of course you could just simply use the server's IP address locally - clients will still access the site.
    This explanation is as simple as I can make it. There are others on these forums who could (or may if they post) explain things a lot better?
    Glad I could help and thank you for the feedback.
    Tony

  • IWeb '08 Personal Domain Name Network Solutions

    This is maddening and Network Solutions is no help. I have a domain name, say <wxyz.com>, registered with Network Solutions. The CNAME page has 3 columns of fields: "Alias" field; "Refers to Host Name" with Radio Button w/popup menu including "www"; radio button w/Other Host field.
    I have tried
    1. web.mac.com; www; blank
    2 web; blank; mac.com (recommended by network solutions staff)
    and neither work.
    Any suggestions? Thanks.

    Sorry to answer my own question but I called Network Solutions again and got a great tech who knew what she was doing and solved my problem. She said they are now familiar with pointing a registered domain name to web.mac.com so the best is to call and ask them to do it--1-866-908-1240.
    For the curious, here's what she did:
    1. Deleted all "A" records, essentially the IP addresses that point to Network Solutions "Under Construction" web page, some with ads.
    2. She added 2 aliases (CNAME Records) for the three fields as:
    a. *; blank; web.mac.com
    b. www; blank; web.mac.com
    Step 1. allowed entering www in the Alias field which I couldn't before and became totally confused.

  • Resolving arabic domain name in Solaris DNS server

    Hi..
    I just quickly want to know how can i define arabic font domain name to get resolve in my DNS server?
    I tried to put entry with arabic name but editor making it abnormal, i recently get arabic locale installed on server through north Africa region. Locale is now showing me "AR" ..
    Thank you

    Sorry my bad.... slight mistake in my question...Here is my corercted query--
    After successfully connecting to the internet, when I do NSLOOKUP on the DC, the DNS doesnt resolve my internal domain/site but instead resolves external sites on the internet.
    My computer FQDN is nri.wwe.com
    Domain dns name is wwe.com
    The above should get resolve internally but it searches on the internet.
    This is how it should work
    & it works perfect when I disable the other NAT network adapter (i.e. disable internet connectivity on my virtual DC)
    C:\>nslookup nri.wwe.com
    Server:  nri.wwe.com
    Address:  192.168.1.11
    Name:    nri.wwe.com
    Address:  192.168.1.11
    But when I again enable internet connectivity, this it what happens.
    C:\nslookup www.wwe.com
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    Server:  UnKnown
    Address:  192.168.12.2
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    Non-authoritative answer:
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    Name:    www.wwe.com.nsatc.net
    Address:  64.152.0.124
    Aliases:  www.wwe.com
    And when I again nslookup, this is what I get,
    C:\>nslookup www.wwe.com
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    Server:  UnKnown
    Address:  192.168.12.2
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    DNS request timed out.
        timeout was 2 seconds.
    *** Request to UnKnown timed-out
    Now this 192.168.12.2 is VM assigned DNS via VM Natting with its own DHCP. If we do it manually, none of the virtual machines can connect to the internet. So I cannot fiddle with it anymore as I have already that as well.

  • IWeb, Dot Mac, family packs... and Domain names???

    I'm a volunteer involved with recreational trails and historical preservation organizations in a rural area. I've been talking with the leadership of these (not-well-funded) organizations for some time about the benefits of establishing web sites for each organization. (Publicizing accomplishments, generating awareness of issues, soliciting support, improving communication, etc.)
    Prior to the recent MacWorld SF Expo, I was looking (very warily) at some of the pay-services out there where you can pay so much a month (or a year) for a web-hosting service which would supposedly offer a domain name of choice, server space, and other services. Of course, with this I would have to learn how to use a web design app like GoLive CS or DreamWeaver MX. I'm not opposed to that. Web-based tutorial services like Lynda.com make it more possible than ever before. Still, I was wary about getting my "bang for the buck"; the combination of my time and the hard-won funding of these organizations resulted in wavering enthusiasm.
    Along comes Apple's iLife 2006 and the offering of a new Dot Mac Family Pack. Looking over the possibilities, there's something to be said for combining iLife '06 with a Dot Mac Family Pack. If Steve Jobs' hype is to be believed, I could put up nice little web-sites for a decent price and have all kinds of technological possibilities for the future. (If anyone wants to post a podcast, it can be done. Posting pictures of volunteer work and developing issues can be a major breakthrough for awareness and support.)
    I'm still concerned about some lingering issues, though. Some of these other web-hosting services offer the means of securing and using your own domain name (i.e., your-organization.org) for a web-site URL and even several e-mail addresses using that same domain name. Still, if I split a Dot Mac Family Pack five ways, that's $36 per site. That's quite a savings over $100+ per year per site that these hosting services were asking. How tough is it to get a domain name, and how much does it cost?

    Walt,
    Getting a domain name is easy enough, as long as you can come up with one that isn't already taken. You can secure a domain name on sites like GoDaddy.com for less than $10 a year, and it gets cheaper as you secure it for more years at a time. GoDaddy also offers free domain forwarding, meaning: you can have your www.brandnewdomainname.com point to your .Mac url (which will read something complex like http://web.mac.com/username/iWeb/somethingorother). If you don't want the complex .Mac url to show in the browser's address field when people visit your page, GoDaddy will mask it for you for free too. Then, it will just say www.brandnewdomainname.com on every page on that site. If you want each page on each of your sites to have its own easy url, say www.brandnewdomainname.com/about or www.brandnewdomainname.com/contact, you'll have to host with GoDaddy or some other site and pay the price.
    If you decide to go with the iLife 06/.Mac combo, the family pack may not be the best thing for you. Have a look at this .Mac page:
    http://www.mac.com/1/currencytable.html
    For $20 more, you can get twice the server space (4GB), and I think that also includes a lot more bandwidth per month than the family pack, but I am not sure about that. For $30 less, you have the same amount of space as the family pack. What you don't have is the 4 additional e-mail addresses. You can purchase those separately for $10 a year, or, you can use up to 5 free e-mail aliases per account. The drawback to aliases is that messages sent to them will all end up in the main account's inbox, which may or may not work for you --perhaps only if all the e-mails are intended for the webmaster and that is you for all these sites. Of course, you could always list individual non-.Mac e-mail addresses on a contact page, and probably turn them into hyperlinks so that if people click on them, their e-mail app will open a new e-mail addressed to that person. May not be the most elegant way to do it, but if you're trying to save money, maybe it's good enough.
    With a regular (non-family pack) .Mac account, you also are not forced to split your server space five ways evenly -- you can host as many sites on one .Mac account as your server space will allow. The main headache for you will be the urls to each individual page of all these sites. If you are picky about them and what exactly they look like, .Mac may not be your thing. Not yet at least. It has the ease of use, but you pay for that in other ways. There's always a trade-off...
    Hope that helps a little.

  • Need to set hostname and domain name

    Hi All,
    I need to
    1) set my "hostname" (foo), and
    2) set my "domain name" (acme.local)
    such that my machine identifies itself as "foo.acme.local". Anyone know how to do this? (I found the host name in file sharing, but it will not let me set the domain name.)
    Many thanks,
    -T

    etresoft wrote:
    Your domain is the name of your server.
    What gave you that idea? My domain name is "acme.local". It is not the name of my server. I have three servers on my network. The one with the DNS, DHCP, and firewall servers on it called "server.acme.local".
    I am confused about why you feel the need to have a subdomain.
    This is not a subdomain. What gave you the impression I was asking for a subdomain?
    What you seek to accomplish is entirely unnecessary and far more involved than just editing a config file.
    Pretty easy in Linux and Windows. They just grab the domain name from the DHCP server. Or, you can hand configure them if you wish. Do you know how accomplish same in 10.6.4?
    Give your machine a name in System Preferences > Sharing and it will have the name "whatever.local". That is all you need.
    I would like to the entire network name displayed correctly. "whatever.local" is incorrect. It should be "machinename.domainname" or "foo.acme.local". In my example, "foo" is the machine name ("whatever" in your example) and "acme.local" is the domain name. (Not the server's name, by the way.)
    "System Preferences > Sharing" will not let me add any extra periods. And will not let me change the ".local" either. (In this instance, I want the ".local".)
    Here is the reverse rule I had to hand create:
    182 PTR foo.acme.local.
    (The dot on the end is not a mistake.)
    I do not want a stray computer floating around that does not identify itself correctly. "foo.acme.local" is correct. "foo.local" is not.
    By the way, this computer gets its IP address from a DHCP server, which does tell this Apple what the domain name is. (It gets ignored.)
    /etc/dhcpd.conf
    option domain-name "acme.local";
    That is the config file for your DHCP server. You would use this if your machine were sharing its internet connection, for example. You don't need to edit this file.
    You misunderstand. The DHCP server, not on this Mac, is not being used to share Internet connections. It is being used to assign IP addresses to machines on the local network. It is also being used to assign fixed IP's to network printers based on their MAC addresses. In my network, these are "off Internet" addresses. The firewall, also not on this Mac, it used to share a single Internet connection with all the internal users.
    Hmmm. I created the file (dhcpd.conf) by hand. And, yes I do need to edit it all the time. Especially when I have bone headed machines on my network that do not follow or respond to standard networking conventions. This Mac does not accept the domain name given to it by my DHCP server and as such my DHCP server will not automatically update my DNS tables.
    Evidence of this can be found in the dhcpd.leases, where I had to hand enter
    client-hostname "foo";
    into the lease table (did not do me any good).
    I am wondering if 10.6.4 is not capable of handling this kind of standard network naming convention. (FreeBSD, which Apple run on top, is capable, so I am confused.)
    MacOS X does not run on top of FreeBSD. They are different operating systems. MacOS X has a POSIX layer which most closely resembles BSD, that is all.
    Interesting. Thank you for pointing out the difference. I bet POSIX know how, just like FreeBSD, which it resembles.
    If I change the name in /etc/hosts, will Apple over ride it? (I am not at the machine or I would just try it.)
    You do not "change" the name in /etc/hosts. You are just adding entries into your machine's lookup table. You can add as many aliases to as many IP addresses as you want. This is not the same as changing your machine's name, but it may be sufficient for what you are trying to accomplish - assuming I knew that, which I don't.
    Then, where do I make the change?
    10.6.4 did not tell the DHCP server what its name was either, so I had to hand add it into my DNS forward and reverse records. AAAAHHHHH!!!!
    I strongly advise against editing files you don't understand.
    I create my entire DNS configuration by hand, including my forward and reverse tables. Oh yes, I understand it, do I ever understand it. You should not jump to conclusions: it is insulting. I am presuming you meant no insult. Just be more careful next time.
    I think that what is happening here is that 10.6.4 is not set up to follow standard network naming conventions. I would posit that the idea is to keep home users out of trouble. Probably a good thing. If 10.6.4 is not capable of using standard naming conventions, (or following standard DHCP conventions), I would just like a confirmation of that so I will stop trying to figure out how to do it. And, stop wasting my time and just hand configure any additional Mac's that enter my network.
    Again, a "confirmation that it can not be done", or "how to do it" is what I am looking for.
    Thank you for the assistance,
    -T

  • Is it possible to restrict the ability to e-mail a pdf outside a specific domain name?

    Hello,
    I am trying to find a solution to a friends problem.  She has a quarterly publication that she sends out to big banks and financial institutions.  Recently she has had some problems with press leaks.  I am trying to find some security options for her however the task is difficult. Because these institutions have firewalls I am not sure encrypting or tracking is the right answer because the publication might not make it through. She wants users to be able to print the publication because many of the readers are older and prefer to read during their commute and at home.  Essentially I am looking for any ways to make readers think twice about sharing the information. I thought if I could restrict e-mail to a specific domain name that would help this way users can only e-mail within their specific company.  If any one has any suggestions please feel free to share. 

    Thank you Todd, I was able to get it to work but I do have a few more questions...
    1) When I tested this, at the top of the message, before any of the text I created, this showed up: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040406040801080102080500 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    2) After the signature line, this showed up: --------------040406040801080102080500 Content-Type: image/jpeg Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: /9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEAYABgAAD/4QAiRXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgAAQESAAMAAAABAAEAAAAA AAD/2wBDAAIBAQIBAQICAgICAgICAwUDAwMDAwYEBAMFBwYHBwcGBwcICQsJCAgKCAcHCg0K CgsMDAwMBwkODw0MDgsMDAz/2wBDAQICAgMDAwYDAwYMCAcIDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwM DAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAz/wAARCAC5ApUDASIAAhEBAxEB/8QA HwAAAQUBAQEBAQEAAAAAAAAAAAECAwQFBgcICQoL/8QAtRAAAgEDAwIEAwUFBAQAAAF9AQID AAQRBRIhMUEGE1FhByJxFDKBkaEII0KxwRVS0fAkM2JyggkKFhcYGRolJicoKSo0NTY3ODk6 Q0RFRkdISUpTVFVWV1hZWmNkZWZnaGlqc3R1dnd4eXqDhIWGh4iJipKTlJWWl5iZmqKjpKWm p6ipqrKztLW2t7i5usLDxMXGx8jJytLT1NXW19jZ2uHi4+Tl5ufo6erx8vP09fb3+Pn6/
    (It was actually much longer than that)
    Is there anyway that I can get that to go away? I obviously would prefer a nice, cleanly formatted e-mail to be sent just like I would send if I were creating it on the spot.
    Thanks,
    Evan

  • Postfix relay=none, ... status=deferred (Host or domain name not found...

    Hi,
    I actually posted this question 2 weeks ago but under the wrong topic. So, first of all wanted to apologise for double-posting... but since no one replied, I thought I'd try again under the right topic.
    I've been trying to solve this all day today (that was Feb 26th). I used to be able to send emails but for some reason it does not work anymore. At first I thought it was a problem with php (I use entropy pack php 5.2.6) but after searching the topic, I think it is a problem with my network. BTW OS is 10.5.5 and Postfix version 2.4.3
    First of all, after computer restart, I don't think postfix starts automatically
    Running 'sudo postfix start' gives me:
    postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix mail system
    Looking at '/var/log/mail.log' I find:
    Feb 27 12:51:04 AMs-MBP postfix/qmgr331: AA70A7A7C77: from=<[email protected]>, size=842, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
    Feb 27 12:52:19 AMs-MBP postfix/smtp456: AA70A7A7C77: to=<[email protected]>, relay=none, delay=3437, delays=3362/0.02/75/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=email.com type=MX: Host not found, try again)
    Running 'sudo postfix check' does not give me any errors
    Checking my '/etc/resolv.conf' it has nameserver 192.168.1.1
    Running 'ifconfig | grep netmask | grep -v 127.0.0.1 | awk {'print $2'}L' gives:
    192.168.1.5
    Checking http://switch.richard5.net/2006/08/19/fatal-open-lock-file-pidmasterpid/ and running 'launchctl list' gives me a long list but no item matches org.postfix.master
    Running 'ps aux|grep postfix' gives
    AM 546 0.3 0.0 599820 468 s000 S+ 1:41pm 0:00.00 grep postfix
    _postfix 331 0.0 0.0 599816 824 ?? S 11:56am 0:00.04 qmgr -l -t fifo -u
    root 329 0.0 0.0 600784 752 ?? Ss 11:56am 0:00.11 /usr/libexec/postfix/master
    _postfix 519 0.0 0.0 599768 752 ?? S 1:36pm 0:00.01 pickup -l -t fifo -u
    Running 'postconf inet_interfaces' at first gave me
    inet_interfaces = localhost
    which I changed to All in '/etc/postfix/main.cf'
    I looked at http://www.postfix-book.com/debugging.html
    Running 'telnet localhost 25' gives me
    Trying ::1...
    telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused
    Trying fe80::1...
    telnet: connect to address fe80::1: Connection refused
    Trying 127.0.0.1...
    Connected to localhost.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    220 AMs-MBP.local ESMTP Postfix
    quit
    221 2.0.0 Bye
    Connection closed by foreign host.
    But running 'telnet 10.1.2.233 25' gives me
    Trying 10.1.2.233...
    telnet: connect to address 10.1.2.233: Operation timed out
    telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
    Running 'ping 134.169.9.107' takes a long time. After a while I stop it and get:
    PING 134.169.9.107 (134.169.9.107): 56 data bytes
    ^C
    o
    + 134.169.9.107 ping statistics ---
    28 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
    I have not idea what the problem is and/or how to fix it. I know the messages get to the postfix daemon but for some reason they do not continue on their way.
    Please, does anyone have an idea of how to fix this?
    TIA,
    Elle

    Dynamic IP addresses with DynDNS Updater (or equivalent) makes it pretty darned reliable, particularly if you buy DynDNS' Mailhop Forward service, which prevents the likes of roadrunner.com and aol.com from blocking mail coming from your server just because it lives in dynamicIP-land. Way cheaper than paying your ISP extra for a static IPA, too, and totally acceptable for low-volume, residential-based servers for personal not-for-profit use.
    Regarding reliable delivery to a dynIPA server, you are only at risk of non-receipt for perhaps a few minutes immediately following when your ISP rotates your WAN IPA, until DynDNS Updater (or equivalent) updates the DynDNS (or equivalent) servers with your new WAN IPA. But that's really not a problem because I think all, well, okay, most, smtp servers will queue for a redelivery attempt if the initial delivery attempt just happens to occur at that time.
    I wouldn't suggest this practice for high-volume enterprise-class servers or for people trying to run a bootleg mail server business for profit (besides, the ISP would shut it down as an abuse of terms of service, anyways), but for low-volume, residential-based servers for personal use and enjoyment, which I suspect is the case for the O.P., I can't say that I find anything unreliable about my dynamic IP-based mail server.

  • Application is not working when changing of oracle server domain name

    Hi friends
    We decided to change oracle server domain name due to some reason .. we changed the domain name but application running on the other server cannot connect to this domain i don't know whats the problem . I change the enterprise manager ( emca -config dbcontrol db -repos recreate_) according to the new domain but some of the future not working like date,etc. can anyone help me how to rectify it plz.

    Mohd khalid wrote:
    Hi friends
    We decided to change oracle server domain name due to some reason .. we changed the domain name but application running on the other server cannot connect to this domain i don't know whats the problem . I change the enterprise manager ( emca -config dbcontrol db -repos recreate_) according to the new domain but some of the future not working like date,etc. can anyone help me how to rectify it plz.I am really confused that what's not working? What I have understood is that you recreated the EM repository. So where does "some of the future not working like date,etc." come into it? Are you checking date from EM ? Which application is not working, your application or EM or both or somethingn else? Tell us the complete version, error information and also post the output of
    emctl status dbconsoleHTH
    Aman....

  • The publishing settings page does not open when I click on the domain name and the iWeb application will not stay on the dock.

    Hello,
    I have been trying to help a friend who is having problems publishing her website. (She has done so previously using Mobile me)
    There seem to be a couple of things wrong with the application,
    1     if I drag the application icon onto the dock, it won't stay there
    2     I wanted to change where her site is published to (she has bought a domain name and has a hosting service now) but when I click on the domain name I do not get the "site publishing settings page" so we can't enter the new details.  All that comes up is the main page of her website.
    I would suggest uninstalling and re-installing Iweb, to see if that clears the problem, but as Iweb came pre-installed with her Imac, I am not sure that we can do this.
    Any ideas please?
    she's using and imac 24 in (approx 4 years old) and running osx 10.5.8

    NO - not correct.  Even if you are still using iWeb 08, you can still publish to another host and not MobileMe.  You do this by selecting the option 'Publish to a local folder" and this will publish the site to your desktop and you can then use an ftp programme such as Cyberduck to upload your site to your host.
    MobileMe will not be here after the end of June, so you will have to find alternative hosting.  They are not taking any new subscriptions.
    On new Macs, iLife 11 is pre-installed, but only iPhoto, iMovie and GarageBand are included, not iWeb and iDVD. The Apple Online store is not selling the boxed version of iLife 11 any longer, so if you want to upgrade to iLife, then you'll have to look online at Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk for a boxed set of either iLife 09 or iLife 11.  Both contains iWeb 09, which is what you would want.

  • Reverse proxy to applications on a server by just domain names possible?

    Hi All
    I am looking for a solution to set up a single server, that hosts four J2EE web applications running on a Glassfish application server with just only one IP address.
    When a user wants to use an application, he/she can just type URL without specifing port and path, and the corresponding web application will be displayed accordingly as shown below
    http://sub1.domain1.com -- > webapp1 at port 9100
    https://sub2.domain1.com -- > webapp2 at port 9200
    http://sub1.domain2.com -- > webapp3 at port 9300
    https://sub2.domain2.com -- > webapp4 at port 9400
    I am wandering whether I could use reverse proxy of Sun Java System Web Server 7 to route the traffic from the domain names to their own application on Glassfish as shown above? I tried by creating two HTTP listeners to listen at port 80, and 443 respectively, but I could not access different applications based on domain names without specifying specifix path or port.
    Is there any recommended resources or example of the mapping, or any other suggested solution?

    Thank you for your reply nsegura. I created 4 different virtual servers as you suggested and it worked :)
    However, I have a problem in reverse proxy base on path.
    The scenario is below
    I have an J2EE application that needs to be deployed in three different environment (production, training, testing). It
    is the same application for three environments, so I want them to have the same context-root. I want to use Sun Web Server 7.0 to reverse proxy to the application in each environment based on path, not URL redirect. Example of URL are shown below
    https://sub.domain3.com/app -- > http://localhost:9500 (with context-root /app)
    https://sub.domain3.com/training/app -- > http://localhost:9600 (with context-root /app)
    https://sub.domain3.com/testing/app -- > http://localhost:9700 (with context-root /app)
    So far, it works if I set context-root of the application in each environment differently
    https://sub.domain3.com/app -- > http://localhost:9500 (with context-root /app)
    https://sub.domain3.com/training/app -- > http://localhost:9600 (with context-root /training/app)
    https://sub.domain3.com/testing/app -- > http://localhost:9700 (with context-root /testing/app)
    I am wandering whether there is a solution with Sun Web Server 7 that I can use to achieve reverse proxy of the same application in different environments without having to modifying context-root for each environment and use URL redirect?
    I was thinking about using rewriting path with reverse proxy, but I did not see this function under reverse proxy tab.
    Any ideas?

  • How do I use my own domain name  with Mac server with iWeb

    For a number of years I have had my own domain name that when typed into a browser it would redirect the browser to my site on the .Mac server. I hear with iLife ’08 I can have my own domain name hosted by .Mac so I know longer have to have the long addresses for each pages the I have now for my site (i.e. the http://web.mac.com/thewildhearts/WildheartPhotography/NatureGalleries.html). How do I go about getting my domain name (wildheartphotography.com) so that Mac will host it and do I need to notify the current host that Mac will be hosting my site now?
    Thanks. I really appreciate the help I get from this forum.
    Pat

    It's very easy, really. You go to your domain control and redirect the address. IPower, for example points the domain name very easily: you just type in the URL of your site and it will point to your mac server.
    I've used GoDaddy before and it is a bit more difficult to "point".

  • How do i use my own domain name with creative cloud?

    how do i use my own domain name with creative cloud?
    i don't want to post web pages from behance.net. i want to use the domain name i have for my material. is there a hosting service for this? if not, can someone give me some pointers so I can publish?
    thanks!!
    Lori

    http://forums.adobe.com/community/behance is where you would ask about publishing to "something else" from that program
    I use OLD Dreamweaver, and upload my HTML with an FTP program to my own web site... I will GUESS you can do that, if you can save HTML to your hard drive to then be able to upload to your web site

  • Domain name, host name - what goes where?

    So to clear the pipeline and reduce the amount of configuration, I decided to get rid of my router and plug my server directly into the modem, thus using the server as the gateway/router for other computers in my home. Hopefully this will eliminate the need for an internal/private network DNS configuration as well as an external/public DNS configuration.
    I have a registered public domain name of N.com and an associated public MX record for this domain which is also named N.com (as opposed to mail.N.com or something similar).
    I reinstalled the Leopard Server software and when the setup asked for a "primary DNS name" I named it N.com (the same name as my registered public domain). I went into firewall settings in the Server Admin and "allowed"/opened port 25 as well as 80 for email and web services respectively.
    When I looked in the Mail settings the default domain name is "localdomain" and the default hostname is N.com (the same as my registered public domain). Default user addresses are [email protected] I have no problem seeing the server's webpages from the internet, but I still cannot get any mail from the internet to show up in my user accounts.
    What more do I need to do?

    an educated guess-
    does the client's email system have something like Spam
    Assassin filtering
    incoming mail?
    is this cgi script matt wright's formmail?
    If yes to both- Spam Assassin is rating the formmail
    generated email as spam
    based on the subject line and default first line of text in
    the message
    body.
    A fix-
    1) hand edit the formmail script, find and change:
    Below is the result of your feedback form
    to any other text
    2) use the optional field to change the subject line from the
    default.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Prevent multiple users from editing/approving the same form SPD 2013,SP 2013

    Hello all, I have a workflow with a to do task, the task is assigned to a group so any of the users in that group can go in and do a quality check on form data and approve it.  How do I prevent multiple users from working on the same form? do I just

  • How do I place a photo in Illustrator from my iPhoto Library?

    I am a graphic designer and I use Illustrator and Photoshop a lot. I don't use iPhoto for most of my photo editing but rather for the organizing it does with my photos in regard to me viewing them. Since updating to iPhoto 08 the other day I am unabl

  • Help!! Bridge cs4 keeps rebuilding thumbs and previews

    I recently upgraded to PSCS4 and Bridge is so unstable I can't believe it. Clean install on G5/4G Ram/128Vram/dual monitors/OS10.4.1. 100% previews enabled/cache distributed to folders enabled. Software rendering enabled. I'm in the process of renami

  • Vat Amount No Captured in MIGO

    Hi All, At the time of Posting MIGO system is calculating Excise Duty only, it is not calculating VAT amount. Please let me know the probable reason for the same Regards, Vivek

  • How to find memory used by page tables

    Is there a way to find out how much memory is currently being used by page tables? I am new to Solaris ;-) I want to quantify the advantages of Intimate Shared Memory (in the context of a large Oracle database with lots of concurrent users). I want t