Alternate vendor used: Vendor of a PO different from vendor through MIRO

Hi,
Is there a report that shows where a Vendor of a PO is different from the Vendor entered through MIRO ?
Cheers

hi
go to me80rn
here put doc cat F
then press shift+F4
here in pur doc header u can select the vendor ,receiving vendor and invoicing party
give some values(1 to 9999999) and excecute
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

ME59N error "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y" message number 06 047

Hello,
has anyone of you idea what could be the reason for that we receive every now and then in automatic purchase order run in ME59N an error message for a purchase requsition "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y" message number 06 047
Also the purchase requisition in error (red) is displayed in the list under vendor Y even though agreement is for vendor X. In purchasing request agreement and fixed vendor X are displayed correctly.
The error does not appear in ME59N if we only select this one single purchase requistion.
Hope for your help and thanks in advance for any contribution.
Br
TS
Message was edited by: Jürgen L

Hello,
Yes, it seems like source is uncertain but cannot understand the reason because 20280 is only vendor for the material. For this same vendor there are three contracts where this material is included but only the latest one 4600000805 is valid.
I checked contract partners, no reference to the 197790 vendor or neither is there in vendor masters for 20280
and 197790.
Is there any way to simulate how SAP selects the vendor in background? And as I said in the afternoon run there is no error anymore or if me59N run for this specific purchase requisition.
Br
TS

Vendor in Invoice different from Vendor in PO....How?

Hi all,
I got a situation where users are entering invoices for Vendors that are different from the PO. The Partner Function IP (Invoicing Party) of the Vendor in the PO is set as the same main vendor.
Example:
PO issues to Vendor 1000 (POrg 1000, CoCd 1000). Part Func IP(Inv Party) is also 1000
Invoice is created for Vendor 9000 (also maintained in CoCd1000 and POrg 1000) by user. Vendor 9000 is not used in any partner functions of Vendor 1000.
How is this possible in SAP ?
Any idea?
The only way I can think of is that the users are chaning partner functions.
Urgent.
Thanks in advance for any quick response.

hi
As i belive you can change the vendor account code while doing the trax MIRO in the details tab there Invoicing Patner can be changed as we know that the goods supplier can be diffrent from the party which is raising the invoice against the goods supplied.
Regards
Sujoy

How to use copy default values for material from vendor master in Account Group

Dear all:
In define AccountGroup for vendor ,there is a field named DURAS which means default values,who can tell me how to use it?
Any informations are appreciated!

Hi Katherine,
I have tried using default value as B in the customizing
If i maintain default values in the vendor master record, it will automatically adopt in the purchase info record.
Here i tried using sales person & telephone no field in vendor master record & it automatically adopts to purchase info record.
Region sales person and telephone no i have maintained in vendor master record, it automatically fetches to info record for the particular account group. I am not sure if there is any relation between vendor master and material master record.
Regards
Subbu.

Using PowerShell to import CSV data from Vendor database to manipulate Active Directory Users

Hello,
I have a big project I am trying to automate. I am working in a K-12 public education IT Dept. and have been tasked with importing data that has been exported from a vendor database via .csv file into Active Directory to manage student accounts.
My client wants to use this data to make bulk changes to student user accounts in AD such as moving accounts from one OU to another, modifying account attributes based on State ID, lunchroom ID, School, Grade, etc. and adding new accounts / disabling
accounts for students no longer enrolled.
The .csv that is exported doesn't have headers that match up with what is needed for importing in AD, so those have to be modified in this process, or set as variables to get the correct info into the correct attributes in AD or else this whole project is
a bust. He is tired of manually manipulating the .csv data and trying to get it onto AD with few or no errors, hence the reason it has been passed off to me.
Since this information changes practically daily, I need a way to automate user management by accomplishing the following on a scheduled basis.
Process must:
Check to see if Student Number already exists
If yes, then modify account
Update {School Name}, {Site Code}, {School Number}, {Grade Level} (Variables)
Add correct group memberships (School / Grade Specific)
Move account to correct OU (OU={Grade},OU=Students,OU=Users,OU={SiteCode},DC=Domain,DC=net)
Remove incorrect group memberships (School / Grade Specific)
Set account status (enabled / disabled)
If no, create account
Import Student #
Import CNP #
Import Student name
Extract First and Middle initial
If duplicate name exists
Create log entry for review
Import School, School Number, Grade Level
Add to correct Group memberships (School / Grade Specific)
Set correct OU (OU={Grade},OU=Students,OU=Users,OU={SiteCode},DC=Domain,DC=net)
Set account Status
I am not familiar with Powershell, but have researched enough to know that it will be the best option for this project. I have seen some partial solutions in VB, but I am more of an infrastructure person instead of scripting / software development.
I have just started creating a script and already have hit a snag. Maybe one of you could help.
#Connect to Active Directory
Import-Module ActiveDirectory
# Import iNOW user information
$Users = import-csv C:\ADUpdate\INOW_export.csv
#Check to see if the account already exists in AD
ForEach ( $user in $users )
#Assign the content to variables
$Attr_employeeID = $users."Student Number"
$Attr_givenName = $users."First Name"
$Attr_middleName = $users."Middle Name"
$Attr_sn = $users."Last Name"
$Attr_postaldeliveryOfficeName = $users.School
$Attr_company = $users."School Number"
$Attr_department = $users."Grade Level"
$Attr_cn = $Attr_givenName.Substring(0,1) + $Attr_middleName.Substring(0,1) + $Attr_sn
IF (Get-ADUser $Attr_cn)
{Write-Host $Attr_cn already exists in Active Directory

Thank you for helping me with that before it became an issue later on, however, even when modified to be $Attr_sAMAaccountName i still get errors.
#Connect to Active Directory
Import-Module ActiveDirectory
# Import iNOW user information
$Users = import-csv D:\ADUpdate\Data\INOW_export.csv
#Check to see if the account already exists in AD
ForEach ( $user in $users )
#Assign the content to variables
$Attr_employeeID = $users."Student Number"
$Attr_givenName = $users."First Name"
$Attr_middleName = $users."Middle Name"
$Attr_sn = $users."Last Name"
$Attr_postaldeliveryOfficeName = $users.School
$Attr_company = $users."School Number"
$Attr_department = $users."Grade Level"
$Attr_sAMAccountName = $Attr_givenName.Substring(0,1) + $Attr_middleName.Substring(0,1) + $Attr_sn
IF (Get-ADUser $Attr_sAMAccountName)
{Write-Host $Attr_sAMAccountName already exists in Active Directory
PS C:\Windows\system32> D:\ADUpdate\Scripts\INOW-AD.ps1
Get-ADUser : Cannot convert 'System.Object[]' to the type 'Microsoft.ActiveDirectory.Management.ADUser'
required by parameter 'Identity'. Specified method is not supported.
At D:\ADUpdate\Scripts\INOW-AD.ps1:28 char:28
+ IF (Get-ADUser $Attr_sAMAccountName)
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Get-ADUser], ParameterBindingException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : CannotConvertArgument,Microsoft.ActiveDirectory.Management.Commands.GetAD
User

Can Pay To the Order of be different from Vendor Name in Check for Payment

My client has several vendors, where payment goes to an organization with a different name. I have created Pay To addresses with the correct information, but would like to automate the process such that the Outgoing Payment, whether created manually or from Payment Wizard will fill in the Pay to the Order of field on the check with a name other than the Vendor Name.
I can manually go into Checks for Payment and enter a different Pay to the Order of name. I want to know if this can be done automatically.
Thanks

Unless you could find a logic to link those info, I don't see any ways to select Pay To by automated way.
Thanks,
Gordon

Payment method not defaulting from Vendor master data

Hi All
I am running F110 payment run. In the Payment proposal SAP is not pulling payment method from vendor master data for some invoice. we have like two payment methods , Sap is defaulting payment method for one type of payment method and not defaulting for the other...What could be the possible reasons?( for both the invoices We are not maintaining any payment method)

Hi
In F110 if payment methods are different from vendor master data and payment methods mentioned in parameters tab it will take payment methods from parameters tab, so that you have to give both payment methods in parameters tab so that it will consider both.

Transfer Material From Vendor to Vendor

Please can anyone explain material can transfere from vendor to vendor....Thank you ....Raveendra

Hi,
What do you mean exactly by transfer material from Vendor to Vendor?
Are these your materials provided to Vendor?
Or are you referring to Consignment?
Anyway, please have a look below.
1) Go to MIGO_TR t-code
2) Set it to Transfer Posting A08, Other R10
3) Use movement type 542 to transfer from Vendor to our warehouse in storage location
4) Use movement type 541 to transfer from the receiving location in step 3 and transfer it to the new Vendor.

Purchase from Vendor B then Sell to Ven A, Then purchase from A

Hi MM Gurus
Please help in mapping below scenario in SAP
In production we need small plates [Material A], MRP gives me total number of small plates needed. We convery this to local Vendor A. We do buy big plates from Vendor B and will sell to Vendor A. Vendor A will sell me small plates we need.
Since we negotiated good price with Vendor B, we sell big plates to Vendor A after buying from B.
Current Process
Total number of small plates needed = 300 [suppose] - From MRP
Big plates needed = 300 * 0.56 = 168
We do buy 168 plates from Vendor B and sell to Vendor A
Vendor A will sell me 300 small plates, no subcontracting process
Please suggest a way out to put this movement in SAP

334,
I think you haven't mentioned the full business requirements. How are you protecting your interests? What is there to prevent A from buying the cheap big plates from you, make them into, say, round plates, and then sell them to his other customers?
I am suspecting that there are further restrictions, or some sort of contractual agreement(s) you haven't mentioned. No matter what you say, it really smells like a subcontracting arrangement with A. For which SAP has a nice planning solution. This is what I would recommend that you explore.
If you are unwilling to treat it as subcontracting, then vendor A is responsible for calculating the required number of big plates, not you. Why all the bother with BOM? Just set a safety stock on Large plates. When A places his order with you, you will ship from stock, and during MRP, onhand balance for big plates will fall below safety stock level, and generate a new PR for the missing qty. Or, if you can stand the delay, just wait for A to place the order, and with zero stock on hand, MRP will immediately give you a purchase req to buy large plates from B.
Rgds,
DB49

[Mail.app] Manage different "from field" when using aliases

I know how to manage aliases in mail.app
My question is: is there a way to tell to mail.app to use for each alias a different "from field"? or the from field will always be the one of my principal account?
This is an option that Thunderbird and Postbox offer.

In Mail >Preferences>Accounts>Account information
Add as many alias as you want to the Email Address field separated by comma.
This is the most user friendly method for creating different "personalities."
When you create a New Mail it will present you with a From: field in which to choose your alias (personality,) much like multiple signatures.

Message when Invoice vendor is different from PO vendor

Hi,
Last week, in MIRO, when i would like to change the vendor (taken from the
order), a system message appears to let me know that this vendor was
different from the PO vendor.
But it was just a warning message and i changed it to an Error message.
(OMRM transaction with message M8 286)
This modication worked last week.
But now, my problem is that i don't any messages when i'm doing the same
operation (vendor change in MIRO).
Can you help me to make this message appears back? Where does this
customizing point located in SPRO ?
Thanks a lot.

Hi,
But that IS the transaction in SPRO to control the message.
If the correct message number has been used and if the userid is blank and if you have set an "E" in the "ONLINE" column then the message WILL be an error message.
Are you sure that the correct message number has been set up in this with an E in the online column?
Please don't take this the wrong way, but you ARE checking the config in the same client / box as you are doing the MIRO? Don/t assume this will be the same setting in all clients.
Steve B

Best practice for presenting different storage vendors arrays..?

Hi, can't seem to find a specific answer in writing on this.
Typical FlexPod already deployed, with different vsans on different n5ks.
Uplinks from UCS / NetApp are FCoE.
So I now want to present some normal FC (not FCoE, nexsan) storage to the same blades on the UCS system via the n5ks.
My main questions are can I use same vsans / vHBAs as for NetApp storage, or should you be creating different vsans and vHBAs for different storage vendors?
If multiple vsan is recommended, is Trunking multiple vsans over FCoE from UCS to FC fine, I'm sure it is but just want some experience on it.
Thanks!

Thanks guys for the input, interesting to see there is a difference of opinion on this topic. Makes me feel happier that I'm not being too stupid and someones posted back a link to a best practice guide on the subject that I've blatantly missed! (still time for that no doubt!)
Like I've said, I haven't found anything specific in writing on this, but keeping vendors on seperate vsans / hbas feels like the best way to do it anyway with only a little extra config in the grand scheme of things.

Payment advice for multiple vendor using tcode F110

Hi all
I am facing problem while printing payment advice program for Multiple vendors using transaction F110. If I passed single or multiple vendor , I am getting only single vendor payment advice details ( if I passed more than one vendor also) .I need solution for multiple vendors .
Tcode : F110
Program : RFFOD__U .
How to print multiple vendor for payment advice details.
pls provide the solution for this..
waiting for Reply.

I have used different program RFFOD__S. It was working fine.

There is a type of partner to indicate a different supplier (vendor) for R

There is a type of partner to indicate a different supplier (vendor) for RFQ. How can I use the partners (ex. by plan) from agreement when I create RFQ in reference PReq with agreement like source of supply?
I defined OA for Ordering Address partner by plan for the agreement. I would like use the good partner by plan when I process a PReq (agreement with source supply) in RFQ.
Thanks - Rene

The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
To Reset Firefox do the following:
#Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
#Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
#Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
#Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Auto message determination for Freight Vendor when different from main ven

Hi All,
We have an issue with auotmatic output determination of a purchase order for a freight vendor, when the freight vendor is different from material vendor.
We are creating a PO for raw-material for vendor 'A'. In the same PO we are maintaining freight condition (FRA1/FRB1/FRC1) and for that condition we are maintinaing a different vendor (e.g Fedex). Now when we save the PO we want the system to output the PO via FAX to both the Vendors (without any manual intervention).
How can we achieve this?
Thanks in Advance
Venkat

Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for your reply.
as per my understanding, you mean to say that freight vendor has to be maintained as CR partner to the material vendor. If my understanding is correct, then the issue is that my client is not interested in maintaining Freight vendor as partner to the Material Vendor. And one more point to be noted is, most of the Purchase Orders are created automatically by MRP (Reorder point planning) . Freight vendor is maintained in the contract. MRP uses the contract as source and creates release orders.
is there any way to create new access sequence for message type NEU.so that system access the table KONV and field LIFNR to find the freight vendor.
As of now i am unable to find this table and field name in the field catalog for creating new condition table.
looking forward to hear from you soon.
Regards
Venkat

Alternate vendor used: Vendor of a PO different from vendor through MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for