Ambiguous Hierarchy for drill in IDT

Hi,
I have created a two Hierarchies in Navigational path in IDT. Both hierarchies use the same dimensions
Org Unit: Level1,Level2,Level3,Level4,Level5,Level6,Emp Full Name
(ii) Org Structure: Level1,Level2,Level3,Level4
The (2) Hierarchies are used in two different reports.
It is prompting me with the below dialog box in my 2nd report.
"You performed a drill action on a dimension that belongs to multiple hierarchies.
Select a dimension hierarchy.
Org Unit
Org Structure"
Is there a way to avoid prompting the dialog box, while drilling down?
If I am using only Org Unit hierarchy, then it is drilling down to level1 .. Emp Full Name even though I specify scope of analysis to level3 in webi.

Hi Jyothy ,
If you use the same set of objects in two different hierachy , then you will get the prompt message in webi report.
It would be better if you create two different class in universe and pull the objects in hierachy 1and 2 from the different class A and B respectively. For example:
1. Class A.level 5 ->Class A.level 6 -> Class A. Emp Full Name
2.Class B.level 5 -> Class B.level 6
Hope it helps
Regards,
Pranay

Similar Messages

Creating a hierarchy to drill-in from fiscal years to fiscal months

Hi All,
TRYING TO IMPLEMENT:-
Creating a hierarchy to drill-in from fiscal years to fiscal months
METHOD THAT I FOLLOWED:- (It worked for Calendar Years)
I have a table fiscal years which has the columns
fiscal_year,fiscal_months.....
I have created a Logical Table"Time" which has the columns fiscal_year,months
I am trying to create a hierarchy(Time Dimension) so that I will be able to drill-in from the fiscal years to fiscal months.
While checking the global consistency , it throws me the following error:-
ERRORS:
BUSINESS MODEL LEDGER_PROD:
[nQSError: 15001] Could not load navigation space for subject area LEDGER_PROD.
[nQSError: 15019] Table TIME is functionally dependent upon level FY, but a more detailed child level has associated columns from that same table or a more detailed table.
Could anyone please assist me in resolving this issue or implementing this hierarchy would be really helpful!
Thanks,

Check your PK of the dimension table. Also check the dimensional keys.
Also, I'm not sure if you're doing a separate hierarchy, or combined one with calendar year. If you're making a combined one, make sure that the child level is the same (usually Calendar Day or raw time key ).

INVALID_VARIABLE_VALUES error for drill down/up

Hello ,
I have created a VC model corresponding to a BI query. The query has 3 variables of which one is mandatory the value for which i am hardcoding.In the output table we have a heirarchy variable for
which I wish to use the drill up and drill down features.But after applying these features, and running
the application ,on clicking the drill down/up buttons i get the following error
Nested Exception. Failure to execute native function. Nested Exception. INVALID_VARIABLE_VALUES
The variable format seems to be fine as I have tried it from the BI side and it also generates the output in the VC output table.Following is the webapi used for drill down .
'FILTER_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT;FILTER_NODE_IOBJNM=0HIER_NODE;FILTER_VALUE='&#ID[ACC40T]@G_L_Account&';FILTER_COLLAPSE= ;FILTER_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT;CMD_1=CMD%3DDRILL_TO_LEVEL%26LEVEL%3D2%26IOBJNM%3DYGL_ACCNT%26DATA_PROVIDER%3DDP;'
Any help would be most appreciated.
BI 7.0,VC 7.0
PS: have already gone through the wiki link for this error
Thank You
Rgds

Vineeth,
Please see my comments below:
1)The complete web api command is in the above thread, the mandatory variable is the fiscal year.
I don't see where you have defined the fiscal year in the web API command below:
'FILTER_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT;FILTER_NODE_IOBJNM=0HIER_NODE;FILTER_VALUE='&#IDACC40T@G_L_Account&';
FILTER_COLLAPSE= ;FILTER_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT;
CMD_1=CMD%3DDRILL_TO_LEVEL%26LEVEL%3D2%26IOBJNM%3DYGL_ACCNT%26DATA_PROVIDER%3DDP;'
2)am not too sure about your question.
Is the hierarchy for YGL_ACCNT defined as a text hierarchy or characteristic hierarchy? If it is a characteristic hierarchy, you should specifiy the parameter FILTER_NODE_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT instead of FILTER_NODE_IOBJNM=0HIER_NODE.
3)the command is as intended as per the sap documentation
If you are following the SAP documentation, the first occurrence of FILTER_IOBJNM=YGL_ACCNT should be removed as it is already defined after the FILTER_COLLAPSE parameter.
Regards,
Mustafa.

Sharepoint 2013: Problem / Error when creating Variation Hierarchy for French and German Languages from Variation root EN

Hi,
I have a website with English and Arabic Language Packs installed. I have the corresponding Variation heirachies created and the whole site collection is published.
Recently the client asked for french and german languages to be accomodated as well. So I followed the same approach I did for English and arabic (installed the language packs) for foundation, ran ocnfiguration wizard, installed server language pack &
ran configuration wizard.
But after creating the variation label, when i try to create the variation heirarchy, I am getting the following error.
"Unknown failure when creating a variation of page http://server:port/en/pages/default.aspx in label /fr/Pages/default.aspx.
The Variations Create Hierarchies job failed with the following error message& Unknown failure when creating a variation of site
http://server:port/en in label fr."
Am not sure what is going wrong. Appreciate a feedback.
Thanks,
SSP
SSP

Hi,
According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when you created the Variation Hierarchy for French and German Languages from Variation root EN.
I recommend to check the Resources folder located at C:\Program Files\Common Files\microsoft shared\Web Server Extensions\15 to see if the file core.fr-FR.resx exists in the folder.
Here is a similar thread for you to take a look:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/611575b2-d129-44c6-814b-2e5782178850/unknow-failure-when-creating-variations-in-sharepoint-2013-is-this-a-bug-in-sharepoint-2013-rtm?forum=sharepointadmin
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

SSRS Recursive Hierarchy for Bill of Material

OK, here we go. I have been absolutely unable to find an answer anywhere after extensive searching so I will ask this here.
First of all, I am trying to create an SSRS report for a Bill of Materials (product structure) with parent child recursive grouping to enable drill down to multiple levels. For the most part, I have achieved the goal of doing this with a proper CTE stored
procedure and including a parent recursive reference to the Child group. Here is my result set of the CTE and the grouping settings:
This produces a very pretty report that allows for drill down to levels with indents and levels and everything! Just one problem..... By grouping on the Component to get the recursive technology to work, the result set of my CTE which has 37 rows gets truncated
down to 32 due to multiple rows getting merged because part numbers can be the same while used on more than one part. In this case, see rows 30 and 34. The child (component) is PLA331. Because they are the same part number but used with different parents,
one of them gets eliminated and the result of my report looks like this:
PLA331 should be listed under SA-0482 but it is not due to the grouping of the part PLA331. How do I get all of the results to display even if I am grouping on the component? I have tried removing 'Hide Duplicates' and it does nothing.
BOMs are a very important part of a business so I am actually quite shocked that I am the only one having this structure issue. Perhaps everybody else doesn't have the same part listed on multiple levels of a BOM? Or a lot of people THINK they have the correct
BOM structure but are unaware of this little problem?
Thanks,
Sayslah

Hi Sayslah,
Based on your description, I create a similar report in my test environment. However, I cannot reproduce the same issue as your post.
Please refer to the steps below to check if there is something different. I create a dataset with three fields: Component, Parent, Qty.
1. Add a table in the report body.
2. In the Row Group dialog box, add Parent Group: [Component].
3. Setting Component Group with Recursive parent: Component.
4. Add Qty field in the table.
You can refer to the screenshot below:
If there are any misunderstanding, please feel free to let me know.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

Create a Navigational Hierarchy for filtering with the Table API

Hello,
I've built a WAD report acourding to the how to document: "Create a Navigational Hierarchy for filtering with the Table API".
It works great but i dont know How to make the hirarchey to show the key and the text.
Please Advice.
David

Hi Kenneth,
please have a look in the source of the executed Web Application. What is inside of the <div> with the id filter?
You should also find a td tag with id hier_xyz with xyz the filter inside of the <div>-Tag with id filter.
Also check whether you have a javascript error.
Have a look on the Javascript function set_style. Perhaps you can paste it here, than I can have a look.
Heike

How to implement Approval hierarchy for Sales Order in Order Management.

Hi,
We need approval process for sale orders in Order Management module. Currently we are using credit HOLD option for orders at shipping level. The issue we are facing now is we can not cancel those orders who contains Service Line item in it while on HOLD. The restriction raised at the time of cancelling the order that the Line Item is "fulfilled". Service line item's get fulfilled.
Is that any other possibility to have Approval hierarchy for Sales Orders in Order Management Module? If it is possible can anybody share the related document or implementation guide?
Thanks with anticipation in advance.
Many Regards
Kaleem Bhatti

I copied the standard order header workflow and the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to custom workflows. I then modified the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to put another completely custom workflow (call this "Approvals") in between the "Book Eligible" and "Book" steps.
The "Approvals" step assessed the sales order, changed the order header to the pending approval flow_status_code, and sent out the appropriate notifications. The "Approvals" step returned a Complete/Incomplete where complete would proceed to "Book" and incomplete would go back to "Book Eligible." The new workflow was then assigned to the order type needed. I don't still have access to that environment (job change) or I would give more definite instructions.

Error in connection of SAP BO Crystal report for enterprise over IDT Universe

Hi Experts,
I am facing a connection issue in Crystal report for Enterprise 4.0.
I am trying to connect Crystal report for Enterprise over IDT Universe which is based on an ECC table. While establishing the connection in crystal report an error pops us stating the data source in invalid as shown below:
Hope the following version details will help you to get some clue on the error.
BI launch pad - Built Number : 915
                               - Product Version : 14.0.5
SAP Crystal report for Enterprise XI 4.0 - Version : 14.0.2
SAP Information Design Tool - Version : 4.1 Support Pack 1
   Please help me to overcome this error.
Thanks,
S.Nirmal

HI,
firstly, would request you to upgrade your IDT i.e client tools as well as CR4E tools to the Server version i.e BI 4.0 sP5 it seems.
then test the issue again and update
Regards,
Atul B

Selection of Hierarchy for FS

Hello there,
   I am attempting to run Business Content Query: 0FIGL_VC1_Q0002 which is based on Virtual InfoCube: 0FIGL_VC1
I could successfully run Query: 0FIGL_VC1_Q0001(a separate query on this cube) and did receive the desired results.
However, when I run the Query: 0FIGL_VC1_Q0002 it does NOT give me any application(transaction)data
Hence, this query(0FIGL_VC1_Q0002) is actually based on the SAP supplied financial statement version Financial Statement (technical name INT)
However, I`d like to use my Financial Statement Item <b>Hierarchy </b>which is loaded to InfoSource : 0GLACCEXT
More specifically, let's look into SAP Standard Query Design of 0FIGL_VC1_Q0002
It consists of list of Key Figures in the ROW.
<i>Right-Click</i> on <b>Result</b>
   Edit Selection
   Under Financial Item Hierarchy, there is Hierarchy INT,
how can I change it to mine ?
   At the moment, I don`t seem to see any other hierarchy selection?
Message was edited with apologies by: John Mcluskey

John,
If in the BEx Query Designer in the FS item properties you clicked on a icon to the right from the hierarchy name field and couldn't see the other hierarchies, it means that you didn't upload hierarchy for 0GLACCEXT!
You wrote that loaded hierarchy to infosource!? The hierarchy should be loaded to 0GLACCEXT infoobject. Besides, you need to load texts for this IO.
Please describe what you've done in this regard so far. The more details the better.
Best regards,
Eugene

Error :Check product hierarchy for uniqueness

Dear all ,
load is failing with below message
Error:Check product hierarchy for uniqueness.
please suggest
Regards,
Puru

Hi Purshottam,
Check the technical names of the hierarchy nodes. They should not be same.
This issue is faced when technical names of the hierarchy nodes are same.
To solve this issue, modify the technical names of your hierarchy nodes and then try loading the hierarchy.
Thank you,
Ketan Z

How to see Summarized Hierarchy for Variances after variance calculation

Hi,
How to see Summarized Hierarchy for Variances after variance calculation.
Thanks
Sunitha

hi Sunitha,
KOB3 is the t.code. assign me kindly.
regards
Sirisha

Set headers for drill-down reports.

Hi!!!
The problem we have by now is when printing a report, selected characteristis are showed in header as "multiple values" instead of showing the real values that user have choose.
Does anybody knows how to set headers for drill-down reports in order to see selected characteristics?
Thanks in advance...
Adela Cambiasso.

Sorry, me again...
I have found yet they way to show in the header the report parameters, I mean, the selection criterias that user used when execute the report... I was able to show selected characteristics inside de report but not the selection criteria...
Do you know what I have lost? or what to use for this?
Thanks again.
Adela.

KCA0 - Convert Aspect for drill-down report in ECC6

Hello experts,
Do you know the steps to convert an aspect (for drill-down reports) from 3.0 to ECC6? And how to add it to the list in transaction KCR0 (Execute Drill-down report). SAP has mentioned transaction KCA0 for doing a conversion after the upgrade but I am not familiar with this transaction. Please help!
Thanks and Best regards,
Chuong

Hi,
You can use all the statements in HR also.
For getting the AB values,there are macros and function modules available.
Macros:
rp-imp-c2-b2.
You need to pass b2 key values before calling macro.For eg,
MOVE pernr-pernr TO b2-key-pernr.(since u r using LDB)
MOVE year         TO b2-key-pabrj. (year you need to pass)
MOVE period       TO b2-key-pabrp. (month)
MOVE '1'          TO b2-key-cltyp.
have a look at these Function Modules also.
HR_WORK_SCHEDULE_TIMES
HR_TIME_RESULTS_GET
HR_TIME_RESULTS_IN_INTERVAL
HR_WORK_SCHEDULE_TIMES
Reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Manoj.

Error : No basis hierarchy for product type 01

Hi
When i am trying to create product hierarchy in CRM 5.0 the following error
"no basis hierarchy for product type 01" is futuring in the system,I would rquest you help in this issue.
Regards
Krishna

Hi All,
While congiguring the material system showing the same mssg like "No basis hierarchy for product type 01". Even If I created the hierarchy. Plz any body is there to solve this issue.
Thanx
Chinmaya

Single hierarchy for multiple target systems

Hi,
I have a version named "Account" with a hierarchy named as "Acc2013".
the hierarchy "Acc2013" is same across Oracle EBS, Oracle Fusion GL, and HFM.
how can i assign multiple node types to the same hierarchy so that i just need to maintain one hierarchy (this case account hierarchy) and select the properties pertaining to each target system?
i.e. i select the Oracle GL from the drop down and give the details for the Oracle GL then i select the HFM category from the drop down and provide the HFM related properties.
the reason why i am asking is, if i dont give the node type, all the unnecessary properties are showing up for other type of hierarchies. for e.g. there is another hierarhcy named cost center there its showing the account related properties.
to summarize, how i can utilize a single hierarchy to be used for different target systems? Appreciate your help. do i need to create different version and hierarchy for different types of target systems?

I'm late to respond to this, but I always preach to customers that it is critical for DRM to act as an enterprise view. This isn't a "System A" hierarchy, or a "System B" hierarchy, but rather it's an asset that is shared by both systems, and therefore attributes for both systems are valid. Since node types provide the ability to hide properties, many interesting options present themselves, not all of which lead to a good outcome in the longer term. If a user doesn't ever want to see properties for a particular system, it would be better to just remove their access to that property category in many cases. (They may already have read only access but they object to "being bothered" with seeing those properties.)
I've seen many DRM implementations head down the other path and end up with duplicate maintenance requirements, configuration challenges, or even having to do major reengineering efforts to transition DRM from a Finance department tool into an enterprise use case feeding a data warehouse. A current customer of mine used a scheme where a checkbox on each property category would make the properties disappear if unchecked...this worked great with a handful of node types, but unfortunately the number of node types needed to support all of these property category combinations was bound by factorial math principles. Consequently the maintenance for this solution went from unweildy to unmanageable as more "non-HFM" data was added to DRM.
DRM implementations should be guided by governance principles and maintenance business rules, rather than than how things appear in DRM. It's how they appear when published that is of primary importance. I think the new features related to Data Governance will help greatly in this regard. Users that are overwhelmed by the DRM UI can easily be limited to the attributes that are relevant to their specific workflows, and only the "Power users" will see everything.

Ambiguous Hierarchy for drill in IDT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for