An Issue in SRM

Hi,
I got an issue in SRM. How to do this?
Spend and savings reports are two of the most common reporting areas within the sourcing organization. In addition to common report characteristics like vendor name, material number, calendar year, etc., a key characteristic for sorting spend and savings data is SCO (supplier subcommodity owner). By including the SCO characteristic within the Spend/Savings cube, end users will be able to rollup spend/savings based on the vendor classification. The SCO code is assigned to a vendor in One-Source. To make this meaningful to users, the description needs to be stored in R/3 and then extracted to BW.
Kindly reply,
Thankyou,
ABC

Hi
First, let me one thing like "ET_MESSAGES" is not a database table it is an EXPORTING parameter of BADI (BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI).
This exporting parameter is referred to one TABLE TYPE (BBP_TMESSAGES_BADI) and internally it refers to the structure (BBP_SMESSAGES_BADI).
So, what you need to do is just capture all the error messages in to some internal table and loop the internal table and populate "ET_MESSAGES" internal table which is a exporting parameter.
Hope it helps you.
Thanks
Siva

Similar Messages

JPY Currency issue in SRM 5 Limit Items

Hi
We are having an issue JPY Currency issue in SRM Limit Items (550 SP 13).
Basically the currencies like JPY, KWR where there are no decimals causes value to be multiplied by 100.
There are lot of notes and threads on JPY currency issues.
But I have not found one that helps fix SRM Limit Items.
Let me know if there is a note or thread that talks about it.
We are on SRM 550 SP 13.
Thank You
Nikhil

see MDM forum

Issue connecting SRM 7.01 to a R/3 4.5B back-end

Guys,
I need your help with the following. We are currently trying to connect a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end. We almost got everything working except for a small problem, maybe you can help. We are using the classic scenario and are creating purchase orders in the back-end based on a SRM SC.
First question did anyone successfully connected a SRM 7.01 system to a R/3 4.5B back-end?
The problem we are encountering is as follows. In customizing in SRM I have selected system type R/3_4.5B as the back-end system type in u2018define system landscapeu2019.This causes for the determination of driver FM B45A_PO_CREATE when SRM wants to create the PO in the back-end (BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER ).This action succeeds because the PO is created in the back-end.
However, the next action of BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER is to read the data again from the back-end via FM B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. This synchronous call is done in order to update the SC status in SRM and create the linkages in BUS2121. This last action fails, because at the time the get detail Bapi is executed by SRM, the EKKO table in the back-end is not yet up to date and error u2018W5 107 purchase order does not existsu2019 is issued by the BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL in te back-end. This causes the SC in SRM to get status I1112 (error in process). Even though this status is issued in SRM, the PO is available in the back-end without any errors if I check this via ME23.
What I see is if I debug the SC transfer process and wait 1 or 2 seconds between the B45A_PO_CREATE and B45A_PO_GETDETAIL. The issue is not there. In this case it appears that the EKKO table is updated on time in the back-end and the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL can be processed in SRM without problems in order to update the SC status. I get status I1113 follow-on document created in this case.
Thus my conclusion is there is a timing issue when connecting to a R/3 4.5B system. Does anyone know a solution. Our thought goes to a small enhancement in the B45A_PO_GETDETAIL FM creating a timer to wait a second before the execution and fetching of the data. I tried it and it worked. But of course I prefer a standard SAP solution. Did anyone experienced similar behavior? Or knows a standard SAP solution to this problem?
Appreciate your help.
Best regards,
Skander

Hi Surender,
The code changes in this note only apply if the system type is u201CERP_Xu2019u201D. This is not the case over here, we are trying to connect to a R/3 4.5B system.
Some additional info, we have multiple back-ends connected. All ECC back-end function correctly and for these we do not have the problem. Only for the very very old R/3 4.5B system.
Any way I tried the note but no luck. This because of the above.
Thx.

Authorisation issue in SRM 7.0

Dear Experts,
We are configuring Extended Classic Scenario in SRM 7.0.
I have 2 Purchasing groups and each having one Purchaser.
Each Purchasing group is responsible for 1 Product category.
When I create and approve shoping cart I need to restrict the processing of PO to the relavent Purchaser.
I have created 2 ZROLE in SRM by coping the standard Operational purchaser role with the modified Authorisation objects BBP_PGRP & BBP_PURORG and assigned it to the corresponding user.
For the purchasers I have asssigned the standard Operational Purchaser role in Portal.
When I log in as Purchaser still I can see and modify the PO's belonging to the both Purchasing group.
Can any one give me a suggestion how to over come this issue.
Regards,
B.N.Karthikeyan.

Hi,
In the PPOMA_BBP -Change attributes . Go to the extended attributes in the give exact product category for the purchaser
so that he can shop only that product category he cannot modify other category
Regards
Ganesh

Plant replication issue in SRM

Hi Experts,
We replicated around 70 plants from ECC to SRM.Each plant coressponds to unique company code only.
The only similarity in all the plants is the adress details.
After replication,faced the red error for about 5 plants out of the 70 stating "Location Already Exists, Partner: 00100025XX Plant: 1090 System: DE1XXXXXXX The Plant is a Duplicate in the same System Plant: 36XX".
I maintained the Search term field in the adress details of those 5 plants and then replicated them from ECC to SRM.Those 5 plants got replicated succesfully.This was in Development environment.
In quality system when i try to replicate the plants,am facing the same red error for 50 out of the 70 plants.
I have checked in table BBP_LOCMAP and i find no entries related to plants which are said to be duplicate.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance
Supriya

Hello,
Please find all of the information on plant replication and maintenance
below.
Firstly, see the note:
563180 Locations - Replication of R/3 plants
1. BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL should be run once in your system.
This cannot be scheduled as a report.
2. For further replication of plants, please use
BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED.
3. The reason for the error BBP_LOCATION004 is due to duplicate
address data for plants. The system will check all address fields and
look for duplicates, if any are found the system will issue this
message and the plant will not be replicated.
4. Once replicated plant address data etc should be maintained using
the browser transaction 'Manage Business Partners' BBPMAININT.
Please set this transaction up as a browser transaction
for the SRM admin user.
5. Plants can also be created in SRM using this transaction BBPMAININT.
The can be assigned to R/3 plants.
See note 563108:
"You can also create individual locations via the Web transaction
'Managing Business Partners' and assign them to an R/3 plant."
Hope this information clarifies your issue.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

Memory Issue in SRM Shopping Cart

Hi all,
Apparently, I have implemented BAdI BBP_PGRP_FIND to map the purchasing group from z-table, based on Organization ID and Vendor. The mapping was successfully done based on the z-table entry.
However, when one of the users tried to create a shopping cart from external catalog, he found out that purchasing group was not mapped successfully, and revert to default Responsible Purchasing Group (using FM BBP_OM_FIND_SC) in the above BAdI.
This issue really puzzle me, as I have tried to replicate user's issue, and I am manage to map purchasing group from z-table, using the same test data as per what user did. I tried to replicate the same issue by using some of my colleagues' workstation, and its having no issue on the purchasing group mapping.
When I told the user to re-test again, he still have the same issue, where he could not map the purchasing group. I suspect is it a browser setting or problem? My colleagues and I are using Internet Explorer 6.0, and mapping is working OKAY. Should I ask the user to clear all the cookies and Temporary Internet Files? Is this make sense?
Also, in BAdI method DETERMINE_RESP_PGRP, I am getting current shopping cart item details by Importing item from MEMORY ID 'SCITEM', could this be the issue of ABAP Memory getting flushed when user performs the testing?
Kindly advise.
Many thanks,
Patrick

Hi all,
Finally, I found the resolution to solve this issue. I have created Implicit Enhancement in include program LBBP_SC_APPF23, Subroutine orgdata_fill. I have cleared parameter is_global-proc_group to clear the original Purchasing Group.
Not sure whether this is the SRM mistake or there is OSS note to fix that, where, I have mapped purchasing group successfully, but the standard program still stick to original purchasing group.
Hope this can be shared to whom encounters this problem.
Regards,
Patrick

Business partner issue in SRM org structure

Hi Experts,
Theres an issue with a particular user in SRM when creating a shopping cart. He gets an error message 'No data found for contact person 'xxxxx'. Inform systm admin". We haverun PFAL in the past to correct this kind of error. Howevere many times the PFAL transaction has to be run at the org level and not at the user level.this involves a lot of risk as i have faced a issue before where all the user attributes got wiped out as the PFAl was run at root org level by mistake.Is there a way where we can avaoid using PFAl and correct these kind of errors. Please provide your thoughts.
Thanks,
Pawan

Pawan,
Can you run a consistency check for this user (BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE or BBP_ATTR_CHECK) to see what is the issue?
Nikhil

Material - UoM Pair issue in SRM Portal - shopping cart

Hello Experts,
When we try to add Pair type material in shopping cart in SRM Sandbox Portal (Material no:
11100000000111) , it is throwing error as " Incomplete items in catalog. Only complete items were transferred" in checkout screen and item is not showing in shopping cart.
I created some test implementation on this BADI BADI bbp_catalog_Transfer, so that it will give more log on SLG1 for this issue.
>
> Error in SRM - SLG1 tcode log for Pair Material while adding to shopping Cart: PR cannot be converted to PAA ; Check units with product 0000000000000000000000000011100000000111 PR PAA 000000000
>
> SRM config(IMG ) for unit of measure:
>
> For PR ISO code - Unit of measure there are 2 entries in SRM config. Already this concept is used in SRM QA.
>
> One entry is PR - This also has ALE/EDI - ISO Code - PR
> another entry is PAA - This also has ALE/EDI - ISO Code - PR
>
> In MDM Data manager for this material 11100000000111, if i look at the catalog item table, There are 2 fields.
>
> A) Unit of Measure - Value: Pair - Look up table is UoM ISO code table
>
> B) Order Unit - Value : Pair - Look up table is UoM ISO code table
>
> In MDM Data Manager in UoM ISO Code table, If i look it, there are 3 fields.
>
> UoM description, UoM ISO Code, UoM Commercial Unit format.
>
> Value: Pair - PR - PAA
>
> It looks like this PR - Unit of measure value (MDM) is not able to adjust or find the right unit of measure in SRM for this material while adding into shopping cart because right now there are 2 entries in SRM for this unit of measure (PR) ISO code.
In SRM for this material - Unit of Measure (Base unit of Measure) in Product work Bench (COMMPR01 tcode) : PAA
In purchasing view : order unit PAA (Pair)
This is SRM-MDM Catalog integration.
SRM 5.5 / MDM 7.1 and SRM-MDM catalog 3.0
Thanks in advance.
I already posted this SRM shopping cart and i just posted to get more inputs reg. this

you have put too many details ..
this error is simple in the fact that there are a few mandatory fields that needs to be transferred from MDM to SRM SC
The following fields are required fields in all cases:
u2022 Either NEW_ITEM-DESCRIPTION[n] or NEW_ITEM-MATNR[n] must be filled. Only one of the two should be filled.
u2022 NEW_ITEM-QUANTITY[n]
The following fields are required fields depending on conditions:
u2022 NEW_ITEM-UNIT[n] if NEW_ITEM-MATNR[n] has not been filled
u2022 NEW_ITEM-CURRENCY[n] if NEW_ITEM-PRICE[n] has been filled
u2022 NEW_ITEM-EXT_SCHEMA_TYPE[n] if NEW_ITEM-EXT_CATEGORY_ID[n] or NEW_ITEM-EXT_CATEGORY[n] are used
u2022 NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ID[n] if NEW_ITEM-EXT_QUOTE_ITEM[n] has been used
u2022 NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT[n] if NEW_ITEM-CONTRACT_ITEM[n] has been used
All other fields are optional.
check in the catalog OCI mappings if these mandatory fields are mapped.
if they look fine : then make sure that the values in those mandatory fields are also maintained in the SRM side
for eg : if Prod cat of R01 is maintained and sent from MDM : then the same R01 must be present in SRM
if UoM ISO of EA is maintained and sent from MDM : then the same EA (not EACH) must be present in SRM
this will solve ur issue.
thanks
-Adrivit

Material Pair issue in SRM Portal - shopping cart

Hello Experts,
When we try to add Pair type material in shopping cart in SRM Sandbox Portal (Material no:
11100000000111) , it is throwing error as " Incomplete items in catalog. Only complete items were transferred" in checkout screen and item is not showing in shopping cart.
I created some test implementation on this BADI BADI bbp_catalog_Transfer, so that it will give more log on SLG1 for this issue.
>
> Error in SRM - SLG1 tcode log for Pair Material while adding to shopping Cart: PR cannot be converted to PAA ; Check units with product 0000000000000000000000000011100000000111 PR PAA 000000000
>
> SRM config(IMG ) for unit of measure:
>
> For PR ISO code - Unit of measure there are 2 entries in SRM config. Already this concept is used in SRM QA.
>
> One entry is PR - This also has ALE/EDI - ISO Code - PR
> another entry is PAA - This also has ALE/EDI - ISO Code - PR
>
> In MDM Data manager for this material 11100000000111, if i look at the catalog item table, There are 2 fields.
>
> A) Unit of Measure - Value: Pair - Look up table is UoM ISO code table
>
> B) Order Unit - Value : Pair - Look up table is UoM ISO code table
>
> In MDM Data Manager in UoM ISO Code table, If i look it, there are 3 fields.
>
> UoM description, UoM ISO Code, UoM Commercial Unit format.
>
> Value: Pair - PR - PAA
>
> It looks like this PR - Unit of measure value (MDM) is not able to adjust or find the right unit of measure in SRM for this material while adding into shopping cart because right now there are 2 entries in SRM for this unit of measure (PR) ISO code.
In SRM for this material - Unit of Measure (Base unit of Measure) in Product work Bench (COMMPR01 tcode) : PAA
In purchasing view : order unit PAA (Pair)
This is SRM-MDM Catalog integration.
SRM 5.5 / MDM 7.1 and SRM-MDM catalog 3.0
Thanks in advance.

see MDM forum

Plant/Location Address issue in SRM

Hi All,
We are on SRM 5.O R/3 4.6C , Extended Classic scenario
We are dealing with a weird issue at this time. The issue is, in the Plant address country is being changed by an unknown program.
I looked at the plants address in R/3 , it is not changed there. And we dont run any batch job for updating plant details between SRM and R/3. All we have are standard SRM jobs set up as the background jobs (Clean req, getstatus 2 vendor update).
Has anyone ran in to weird issue like this? Can someone please give me pointers? let me know what should I be doing in fixing this weird issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hello Krishnav,
If i understand correctly, you think location address was changed in SRM and not in R/3 ?
Check CHUSR, CHDAT and CHTIM fields in BUT000 table: they will give you user ID who made last modifications and when.
Those address modifications should have been done directly is SRM (using Web GUI) or running BBP_GET_LOCATION_XX reports.
Regards.
Laurent.

ROS issue in SRM 7.0 with SAP EP

Hi Gurus,
I am on SRM 7.0 and have referred to several posts in this forum, in particular, these -
Re: Not able to transfer suppliers from ROS to EBP
Re: External Web Service setting for Supplier Registration ROS to EBP
I have been able to bring the potential supplier to ACCEPTED status, thereafter, I am trying to make the potential supplier available in the SRM system as a Bidder/ Vendor. I know this needs to be done from the "Business Partner from List" - however, I am not able to see "Business Partner from List" in SAP EP Strategic Purchaser or SRM Administrator tabs.
Here is all of what I have done in SRM Configuration - I dont have a separate ROS Client, which means, the SRM and ROS Clients are both 100 in my case. There is no SUS either.
- configured Sup. Reg. (select prod cat for regn, language, assign questionnaire to prod cat.)in SRM Client.
- activated ROS services in SRM Client.
- created a service user in SRM. This user has roles: SAP_EC_BBP_CREATEUSER & SAP_EC_BBP_CREATEVENDOR. This user is maintainted in SRM client BSP service ROS_SELF_REG in Log on Data with SRM client, user ID and password.
- created an external web service 'ROS' in SRM with type "Supplier Diretory" and defined standard call structure as follows:
      10   http://sapsrmabap.jiverry.com/sap/bc/bsp/sap/ros_prescreen/main.do   0 URL
      20   SAP-CLIENT   100    2 Fixed Value
      30   LOCALE         ENGLISH       2 Fixed Value
      40   User               SNR              2 Fixed Value
      50   PASSWORD   password    2 Fixed Value
      60   HOOK_URL    <BLANK>     4 Return URL
      70   ~OKCode        ADDI            2 Fixed Value
      80   ~target            _top             2 Fixed Value
      90   ~caller             CTLG           2 Fixed Value
- maintained the table BBP_MARKETP_INFO with Vendor root, Std. Purchasing Org and Currency
Please let me know what I am missing in the configuration or what I have incorrectly done thus far.
SNR
Edited by: SNR on Mar 26, 2010 7:35 PM
Edited by: SNR on Mar 26, 2010 7:52 PM

SNR,
Are you implementing ROS without SUS in one client?
I did face similar problem and Summer recommended me to change the SRM system from LOCAL to EBP_SUS (table BBP_BACKEND_DEST). Currently I am unable to try this on my system. Can you please try and let me know whether it works or not?
Did you manage to successfully complete this scenario?
I know XI is mandatory to change the potential supplieru2019s business partner status in ROS when they are accepted and transferred to EBP. Any idea what settings are required to perform.
Sandeep

Vendor Migration issue for SRM as add-on to ECC

Hello Experts,
I am working on SRM as add-on to ECC.
When I am trying to migrate vendors from ECC to SRM using MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT. Within monitor, all queues are 'green' indicating that data has successfully migrated to SRM.
But when I check vendors in trx- ppomv_bbp, i don't see any vendor being migrated from ECC. Neither the BPs are crated for these vendor masters.
I have configured all necessary configuration- i.e.
1) I have carried out necessary settings in tables-
mdsv_ctrl_opt_a
crmc_but_call_fu
v_tbc001
2) In addition, I have maintained backend Purchase Org in PPOMA_BBP.
3) I have checked RFC connections, definition of logical systems and
it seems to be alright.
Can anybody please guide if I am missing on any config or can point
me in right direction to investigate??
At SRM GUI, I tried making a local vendor using 'BBPMAININT' but end up in a short-dump.
Can you please help?
Thanks and Regards,
Amit

Hi,
if you problem is still existing, following might be possible solution. Try it.
Maintain Table BBP_MARKETP_INFO with corresponding Vendorroot ID (ex. VG50000....) that you already created in the PPOCV_BBP trx.
Hope it helps.
Regards
PM

Issue with SRM SEVER IC 7.01 Mapping content

HI,
We have imported the SRM SERVER 7.01 and SRM SERVER IC 7.01 onto our PI system. And copied the follwoing mappings from namespace 'http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global/IC' to our Software Component Version.
1. MM2SUSOrderCreate
2. SUS2MMOrderResponse
After makking some changes in the filed we checked the mapping, but it throwing the following error from UDF.
1)Function another, Line 3:
not a statement if (a.equals("001")) Object iter =storage.fullNameMap.get("/ORDERS02/IDOC/E1EDP01/E1EDP19/KTEXT");                       ^
Function another, Line 3:
';' expected if (a.equals("001")) Object iter =storage.fullNameMap.get("/ORDERS02/IDOC/E1EDP01/E1EDP19/KTEXT");                              ^ 2 errors
2) Source text of object Message Mapping: MM2SUSOrderCreate | http://pg.com/xi/pdm/b2b/global/suppconn/sus has syntax errors:
Function checkDescr, Line 2:
cannot find symbol symbol : variable context location: class com.sap.xi.tf._MM2SUSOrderCreate_    String value = context.getIterator(0).getValue();                   ^
3) Function name2, Line 2:
cannot find symbol symbol : variable context location: class com.sap.xi.tf._MM2SUSOrderCreate_    IResIterator iter= context.getIterator(0);                       ^ Note: /usr/sap/GDD/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdcccc054aec611e0c313000000cab07a/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM2SUSOrderCreate_.java uses or overrides a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. 2 errors
4) Source text of object Message Mapping: SUS2MMOrderResponse | http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global/IC has syntax errors:
Function textTest, Line 6:
array required, but java.lang.String found
    buf.append(a<i>);
                ^
Function textTest, Line 10:
cannot find symbol
symbol : variable result
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._SUS2MMOrderResponse_
   result.add(ausg);
   ^
Could any one please help me out on this?
Regards,
Baskaran K

Hi Baskaran,
I am using the SRM std. content too and getting the below errors after copying into my SWCV and activating.
4) Source text of object Message Mapping: SUS2MMOrderResponse
|http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global/IC has syntax errors:
Function textTest, Line 6:
array required, but java.lang.String found
    buf.append(a<i>);
                ^
Function textTest, Line 10:
cannot find symbol
symbol : variable result
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._SUS2MMOrderResponse_
   result.add(ausg);
   ^
Can u please let me know what changes have you done to make it working.
Thanks
Neha

Vendor Issue in SRM

Hi All,
I have question regarding vendor mapping to purchase organization and company code.
I am working on SRM 4.0. Suppose I created a shopping cart for company code A and purchase organization X using vendor XYZ.
This vendor is defined for only company code B and purchase organization X at the backend.
Logically the PO(extend classic scenario) should not get replicated to backend as company code for the vendor is not correct in the shopping cart.
But in my case it is getting successfully replicated.
Please let me know what should be the standard behavior.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Archana

Hello Archana,
Behaviour you describe is SAP R/3 standard. I don't remember if you will have the same process (i mean no checks at PO creation in R/3) with an existing info-record.
If yes, you need to make your own checks in SRM using R/3 RFC call on vendor data to test if your SC company code makes part of vendor company codes.
A more elaborate solution is to modify SRM vendor search-help in order to add company code as a search criteria.
Summary also in this thread:
[Vendor filtered by Company Code and not Purchasgin Organization|Vendor filtered by Company Code and not Purchasgin Organization;
Regards.
Laurent.

Progress indicator issue in SRM portal

Hi,
I have used a progress indicator function module in one of my reports. It is working fine in SAP GUI but not when I run it in SRM portal. Is there any other way of putting progress indicator in portals?
quick response appreciated!!
Thanks,
Dhareppa

see MDM forum

An Issue in SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for