Analysis for lab system

hi all ,
i am trying to make analysis to my system which is (a small laboratory system) , but i have no experience
in systems analysis , just a small idea ,
so , what i reached to is , it is a small place with( one doctor , patients , one or two workers ) , just this , this is what in my mind ,
so , it would be only one table for patients data , which will contain these columns (pa_name,age,test,......) ,
, another table for workers and their salaries
, only this .
am i thinking incorrectly , do i miss somethings here ?
thanks in advance

+"...2- no table for past visits , because it's mentioned in the first table of information , right ? ..."+
Wrong. You cannot create a table with an infinite number of columns to store all the visits. Keep in mind the relationnal model.
One table for the patient, one another for the visits, because one patient can have 0 to n visits.
+"...but you can now participate me step by step in detail..."+
I also have to tell you that I won't manage this kind of infinite thread, because, this forum is not made to build a complete application step by step with hundreds (thousands) posts.
Francois
Edited by: François Degrelle on Oct 4, 2012 3:24 PM

Similar Messages

Result Analysis for Project Systems

Hi all
Does any1 have any documentation relating to Resut Analysis for Project Systems incl POC calculation and other basic concepts. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Hrishi

Hi,
Please follow the link below: it has all the details for the POC methods:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/90/ba6f37446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm
Hope its useful.
Reward points if found useful.
thanks..

GRC 10 - Risk Analysis in legacy system

Hi everybody,
I have a problem with legacy connectors in GRC 10. I implemented the note 1594963. So, I created the legacy files and storage it in GRC server.
When I run the user synch, the legacy connector only synch the first record.
Someone can help me? Someone did implement a risk analysis for legacy systems?
Regards,

Hi Claudio Ekel
Can you share some inputs on the Legacy Risk Analysis.
We have configured the Legacy Connector as per the note 1594963 ; Placed the files on the server & tried running Synchronization Jobs. But the data is not getting uploaded to GRC10 .
We made sure that text files are in UTF-8 format
Is it mandatory to load all the 11 files that are provided in the note 1594963? We have excluded the Profile related files
Can you share a sample of Legacy file formats that you have used for the sync.
Can you throw some light on what could be the possible issues for data not getting uplaoded to GRC10?
Regards,
Pavan Muthyala

Risk Analysis for Third party ERP system

We want to perform offline risk analysis for third party ERP(SRM) system.... We have already GRC system installed with Global rule set for SAP ERP & want to have another ruleset for offline risk analysis.
Just would like to have a confirmation for below steps & estimated time for this.
Activities Need to be performed from Our side(Client) :-
1) Send the RAR format for Users/Roles/Actions & Permissions.
2) Cross Verify the format.
3) Create the connector for stored files.
4) Upload the files via Data Extraction utility.
5) Generate the ruleset for SRM(third party).
6) Schedule the various background jobs.
Activities Need to be Performed from Third Party - HUBWOO(Owns SRM ERP system) :-
1) Convert users/action/roles and permissions files to RAR format.
Activities need to be Performed from SAP :-
1) Provide the ruleset for HUBWOO SRM system.
Please let me know if I missed any step above & estimated time to complete from our end & did anyone has come across ruleset for HUBWOO system..?
Thanks in Advance!!

Thanks all for your reply,
Alpesh, but still I have small concern here, when SAP provide the ruleset files, it also provides for Oracle, People soft & JDE ERP.
Though these are also third party ERP's for SAP...?
Does it mean that we can'task for ruleset for other third party ERP from SAP...? or does SAP Charge something for it..?
Thanks

Lab Systems: Is it a part of IS-H* Med?

Hi,
Does SAP IS-H* Med supports Lab systems. Do they integrate with the equipment and get the results back? Please let me know
I have seen radiology and pharmacy modules are part of IS-H* Med but I cannot find LIS system part of Med. Is it necessary to have an external system for LIS and connect to the instruments. Thank you.
Medical Record management is used to display the lab reports and all the medical records of the patient but is there any way that I can store the reports directly.
Regards
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh,
ishmed supports the import and display of lab results and the request of examines. Ishmed is NOT a LIS (Lab Info Sys) and does not support the import and evaluation of analyser results.
For more info see
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ish463b/helpdata/EN/2e/109e377af82a17e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ish463b/helpdata/EN/2e/109e377af82a17e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ish463b/helpdata/EN/2e/109e377af82a17e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ish463b/helpdata/EN/2e/109e377af82a17e10000009b38f842/frameset.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/99/8cae395b0ae361e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/99/8cae395b0ae361e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
Kind regards,
Martin

BO Analysis for Excel – How to connect to SAP BW

Hi Gurus,
We recently upgrade to BO 4.1 (from 3.1). And want to start to use Analysis for Excel.
We are little unclear how to connect from Analysis for Excel to SAP BW 7,3.
From Analysis select “Select Data Source” Then get a pop-up “Logon to SAP BussinessObjects BI Platform” with User, Password and Web Service URL. All those are blank. For the Web Service URL there is a message “Error while checking availability of SAP BussinessObjects BI Platform system”
If choose “Skip” then get SAP Logonpad and can log on to BW. From there I can choose the BW queries directly.
What is the best practice to connect from Analysis for Excel to SAP BW?
Is it not possible to connect to the BO server? And choose OLAP connection from there to connect to BW?
If so, is something missing in our setup?
Regards,
Reynir

Yes you need to define an OLAP connection of you are connecting to BW through the BIP - see tutorial http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-20625
You can also connect directly to BW without going through BIP
I also recommend searching before you post per SCN rules - there are many posts about creating OLAP connections
Tammy

Due date analysis for G/L account

Hy!
I need to make a report that makes due date analysis for G/L accounts similar to S_ALR_87012078 Due date analysis for open items
for Account payable.
Has any one experience with that and can help me with that?
Regards,
Marina

Hi Marina,
its a bit surprising why you require due date analysis for GL accounts as GL accounts are used for realtime posting and no credit involved. Only AR and AP accounts contain credit, so they may be even over due and thus we require ageing or due date analysis.
If transaction is on a cash basis should be posted to GL not to Subledger. Since there is no due date system for GL posting due date is not possible which makes sense too.
Hope this gets a better clarity for you.
Regards
Bharat

Analysis for Office 1.4.7 Can't do calculation based on HANA data

Hi,
We are currently using Analysis for office 1.4.7 based on HANA data. When we try to use calculation, we got following error.
Nested exception. See inner exception below for more details:
Unable to execute SQL statement (CREATE_COLUMN_VIEW) \: CREATE OLAP SCENARIO '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<cubeSchema operation="createCalculationScenario" version="3">
    <calculationScenario name="POC-zmlf-fico-histcopatma-pkg/CALV_SHCOPATMA_MUL_1408373161431" schema="_SYS_BIC">
        <scenarioHints createInMemoryOnly="false"/>
        <dataSources>
            <analyticDataSource view="POC-zmlf-fico-histcopatma-pkg/CALV_SHCOPATMA_MUL" schema="_SYS_BIC" name="columnViewSource">
                <attributes>
                    <allAttribute/>
                </attributes>
            </analyticDataSource>
        </dataSources>
        <calculationViews>
            <aggregation defaultViewFlag="true" name="defaultAggregation">
                <inputs>
                    <input name="columnViewSource"/>
                </inputs>
                <viewAttributes>
                    <allViewAttribute/>
                </viewAttributes>
                <keyfigures>
                    <allKeyfigure/>
                     <calculatedKeyfigure datatype="double" aggregationType="sum" name="[Measures]_Formula1">
    <formula>("G_QVVNTW" - "ZKGPSTD")</formula>
</calculatedKeyfigure>
                </keyfigures>
            </aggregation>
        </calculationViews>
    </calculationScenario>
</cubeSchema>' (ERROR [S1000] [SAP AG][LIBODBCHDB32 DLL][HDBODBC32] General error;258 insufficient privilege: Not authorized)
Currently the account we use has select access to "_SYS_BIC". What else do we need in term of priviledge?
Thanks.
Terry

Hi Tammy,
We can do calculations now with Create Scenario" system privilege.
The issue I am facing was what objects we can do calculation and what objects I can't or should not.
Example:
     I can do calculation between kilos and Net Weight(Kilos) since both are quantity. Once I bring in Gross Profit at Standard which is dollar value into my calculation, I got "No applicable data found".

Mulltiple Rule Sets in GRC 10.0 for one System

Hi All,
We do have 2 different companies working on one system and by that 2 different rule sets that are applicable.
Due to that we are facing different problems we don't know how to solve yet but lets start with the first one dealing with the rule set that should be used in the access request.
We want to determin which rule set should be used over the requested role (e.g. if role name contains 0001 use rule set 0001, if role name contains 0002 use rule set 0002).
We have alerady tried several different senarios in BRF+ without success.
Does anybody have a solution or at least an idea for this topic?
Thank you all very much in advance!
Eva

Hi Ashish ,
Thanks for your time . Let me explain you my requirement and would really appreciate if you would have some inputs here which would help me to design this .
The actual client requirement is to design a CUP Workflow and If there are SOD issues identified, the workflow will need to go to a central team for them to address each issue. If this group decides to apply mitigating controls to the issues, the workflow must then go to the compliance group for them to review for appropriateness. Requirement is do a SoD analysis for every role change/add request , so that this group takes the appropriate action based on the SoD Analysis . For all my CUP request raised , i want system to do a SoD analysis and let this group know whenever there is a SoD found or just end the workflow if there is no risk.
I am aware of the Risk analysis process for GRC 10.0 , however i want it to happen as a part of this work flow requirement.
The requirement is to configure the access request work flow so that the end goal of work flow is just facilitation of an SOD review. I hope i was able to explain my requirement . Thanks again for your help.
Your valuable guidance would be really appreciated.
Vikas

GRC 10.0 SP14 - Poblems when generating rules for logical systems

Hello Experts!
We recently updated a DEV system to SP14 and we're having issues regarding the rule set generation. I'd like to know if you have faced a similar problem after installing SP14. The details are described below:
Create a test function ZTEST_F1
The action PFCG is associated to a Physical System (Test Connector SP14) and to a Logical System (Sistema Logico Retail)
The logical system contains D05 among other connectors:
And it’s defined as a logical group:
The connector “test connector Sp14” points to the same system as D05.
Now I create another function, let’s say ZTEST_F2
Now let’s define a SoD Risk ZTSTSP14
Generate rules and after that we check GRACSYSRULE table for such risk and we get:
Let’s add more transactions:
Generate rules:
Now in the table we get:
The logical system has been added to the GRACSYSRULE table for the new combination and also the physical system TST_D05, but there's no combinations for the system D05 for example.
Now if we run SoD analysis:
We have four combinations for the physical system TST_D05 but only two for D05 that belongs to the logical system:
Do you have any clue? have you faced a similar problem?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Diego.

Hello Collen!
First of all I want to thank you because after aplying the note the rules generated fine and now the Risk Analysis is OK for the example described above:
I've also tested with a huge number of risks and made a comparison between the results of the Physical conector and the Connector that belongs to a logical group and I got the same results as action level as well as Permission Level as expected.
Regarding the note itself, we usually check for notes and we have implemented many notes in advance related to rule generation issues.
The point is that, as my point of view is just not acceptable to get a new SP with this kind of issue. Rule generation is a core functionality and SAP must test such functionalities before releasing a SP and these checks cannot rely on the customer. For me, rule generation issues in GRC are just unnaceptable. I can accept issues with other modules or new functionalities, but with role generation they must guarantee that it works properly and perform the requiered tests before releasing an SP.
Well... bottom line the issue has been resolved and I really appreciate the help you provided!!!!
Many Thanks!!!
Diego.

Idoc Error: Could not find code page for receiving system

hi,
I am facing the following error while processing Idocs.
ERROR: Could not find code page for receiving system
Diagnosis
For the logical destination BWFIN, you want to determine the code page in which the data is sent with RFC. However, this is not currently possible, and the IDoc cannot yet be dispatched.
Can somebody suggest a solution for this. I have verified that the RFC destinations have been created both on the sender and receiver, ports (WE21) have been defined, and partner profiles (WE20) also created. How would I troubleshoot this problem?

Hi,
I did analyse on this issue.It is all because of the Langauge settings in the SM59.This can be done by the BASIS person.The Language field would be empty, but when ever we send the IDoc from the unicode to a non unicode system we have to mention the Langauage used.
If this helps you really award me the points.
~Katty

What does the field Inconsistent mean for ABC Analysis for Cycle Counting report

What does column "Inconsistent" mean for report ABC Analysis for Cycle Counting (T-code MIBC)? The reason I'm asking is because I see TotalStock values greater than 0, but the Accounting 1 view for Material Master and MMBE both show zero stock. I do not understand why TotalStock in the report does not show zero. Can anyone explain how this can happen?
Note: the report is run for consumption/usage date range.
Thank you,
Doug

Hi,
MBEW table and MMBE transaction will show the current stock. When you run MIBC report for consumption, the system considers the consumption for the date range given (from MVER table), which may not be equal to the current stock. Refer the KBA: 1817237 - Stock quantities and stock values in MIBC which explains the system design.
Regards,
AKPT

Ageing Analysis for ARE Documents - Clarification

HI,
1.What is the Purpose if ageing analysis for ARE ? and when it will be helpful ?
2. When i click on the Document system is showing is ARE Status numbers, each one have its own purpose can any one guide me
3. how it is helful to the Enduser ?
because i am new to CIN so please guide me
Reagrds,
Anu

You can use Tcode J_1I_ARE1_AGEING_ANALYSIS for SAP Report on Excise Bonding's Ageing analysis related to ARE1 document.
Excise Bond is a document that effectively licenses a manufacturing plant to remove goods from its premises without paying basic excise duty, on condition that the goods are then exported. These bond covers a fixed amount of excise duty. The excise duty of the goods exported under bond cannot exceed the bond value.
In the system, the term "excise bond" also covers letters of undertaking, and all of the excise bond functions apply equally to letters of undertaking, unless stated otherwise.
When you obtain a bond from the excise department, enter it in the system. The system numbers each bond automatically.
When you assign an ARE-1 to a bond, the system automatically warns you of any reservations that have already been made against the bond.
The system keeps track of the bond balance for you. When you post an ARE-1, the bond balance decreases automatically. In the case of running bonds, the balance increases again when you close the ARE-1.
Once an excise bond is no longer of any use to you, for example, if it expires or if you have exhausted a fixed bond, you can close it. This prevents any users from using it afterwards.
So, these kind of report will assist a user in day-to day ARE1 related activities.
Further, in Statement Regarding Export of Excisable Goods will show selection screen. Where you specify which parts of the statement you want to prepare as follows:
I
All stock removals without payment of duty
II
All removals from previous quarters for which you have not yet received a confirmation of receipt from the customs office
III
All stock removals that will exceed the export period by the end of the month
IV
All removals that you have reversed
V
A list of your bonds with their balances
Hope this assist you in understanding.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Error in codepage mapping for source system. Error text:

guyz,
im facing the below issue in prod.
Error in codepage mapping for source system. Error text:
Message no. RSDS_ACCESS013
Collection in source system ended
Error message during processing in BI
Diagnosis
An error occurred in BI while processing the data. The error is documented in an error message.
System Response
A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.
Further analysis:
The error message(s) was (were) sent by:
Inbound Processing
Procedure
Check the error message (pushbutton below the text).
Select the message in the message dialog box, and look at the long text for further information.
Follow the instructions in the message.
need your guidance,
cheerz,
raps.
Edited by: raps on Mar 1, 2012 9:39 AM

Hi ,
Kindly go throught the following threads for your issue resolution::
Error in code page mapping for Source System
Erroe in source system
Regards,
Arpit

Pricing Schema for Project System

Dear Sappers,
I'm configuring Pricing Schema for Project System(PS) module.
The requirement is, the schema will be in such a way that it supports both excise, CST, VAT and service tax.
In PS module the user raises a Purchase Order having procurement of material as well as taking service from Vendor.For this in PO he will maintain both material as well as service.
I'm configuring the Pricing schema in MM - Purchasing - Condition.
My question is for materials procurement, everything is working fine.But for service respect to activity number I want to maintain service tax and other cess in condition record.
But to maintain service tax & other cess for activity number, I want the access sequence of sevice to be in Purchasing.I've taken the standard table for Plant, Vendor, Purchase Organinzation and activity number combination from External Service management and making a new access sequence in MM - Purchasing.All fields are coming but for Activity number, it not taking the document structure and showing error.
How to overcome this??
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Warm Regards
PKB

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for your suggestions.
As per you reply, the access sequence is already maintain in External Service Management.But I want to bring the same combination Plant, Vendor, Purchase Organizartion and Activity number that is Table 97 to MM - Purchasing - Conditions- Access Sequence.
I've tried to do it, but when I'm creating in MM - Purchasing, all document structure is copying except activity number.What I analyse the error is due to application area.Activity number is MS (External Service Management) area but i'm trying to do in M(Purchasing)
Even though when I enter manually MS for the access sequence system is not taking.
Suggest me.
Warm Regards
PKB
Edited by: Pranaya Barik on Dec 11, 2009 12:09 PM

Analysis for lab system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for