Any problems reported after RH 8.01 upgrade?

Hi all,
Just curious if anyone is experiencing any problems after applying the 8.01 upgrade? I use RoboHelp HTML and the Link-to-Word feature, and ever since downloading the upgrade (a couple of days ago), it seems that I can't do more than a few changes (delete, link, generate, upgrade) without getting the "Adobe has encountered a problem..." message, and my changes are lost. Granted, I did just move some folders around and had to re-link folders, but I've never had this kind of trouble in the past. At this point, I'm unable to get my topics back without eventually encountering a shut-down with all changes lost..again.
It could be just a coincidence...not sure. Any thoughts?
Thanks!

The 801 patch was finalised before the folderbug issue was identified, so no the DLLs are not included.
The answer to your question is easy, no idea and even if I did I would have to kill you, not a good end to the week.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
Follow me @petergrainge

Similar Messages

I don't know who will see this, but i'm writing this here, because i cound't find any problem report places anywhere.

I don't know who will see this, but i'm writing this here, because i cound't find any problem report places anywhere. Your site are too confusing. I just wanna say that css3 isn't working properly in mozilla. It lags. Other transitions doesn't work at all. Check this site http://css3exp.com/moon/ on your and on chrome browser to see differences. Could you write me a reply to this... question...? [email protected]

It appears you have accidentally subscribed to a community and were getting e-mails for all related posts. I have removed the subscriptions, so you should be getting no more e-mails. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I'm sorry you recieved so many e-mails you did not want.

Will 16Gb RAM on a Early 2011 2.7 Ghz i7 Macbook 13" cause any problem? Also i plan to upgrade to Mountain Lion, will it work?

I want to upgrade my machine with 16 GB RAM, it already has a G.Skill single RAM chip of 8gb. need help with the following. Will upgrading to 16Gb RAM on a Early 2011 2.7 Ghz i7 Macbook 13" cause any problem? Also i plan to upgrade to Mountain Lion, will it work?

It won't cause you any issues or problems....
it is however, suggested you install the same brand RAM that are of the same specs....
1333MHz........
Installing different brands with different CL speed might cause issues....
so if you already have a G.Skill RAM installed, then install the same brand.

Will there be any problems with Parallels Program if I upgrade to Maverick OS?

I have OS 10.7.5 on my intel iMac desktop and MacBook Air with Parallels 9.0.2 running Windows XP. Will there be any problems if I upgrade to Maverick OS? Do I have to do anything special because of the Parallels side when I upgrade?

You shouldn't have any issues, since Parallels v9 is the current version. You might want to visit the Parallels support forums to see if users there are aware of any issues. I know I upgraded my MBP from Mountain Lion to Mavericks and I had no issues with my Parallels v8. A short while after the update to Mavericks, I did upgrade my Parallels to v9, but I wasn't really having any problems on v8 either.

Has anyone had any problems with the 10.0.3 upgrade?

I'm running WinXP and presently have Adobe Reader 9.4.3. Before I upgrade I would like to find out if anyone has had any problems with the new release? The last time I upgraded an Adobe product (Flash) it screwed up my ability to watch videos on my browser.
Any information would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Spin45

Adobe Reader has the original 10.0.0 with its associated vulnerabilities and the patch of 10.0.1 which seems unable to run in protected mode in my environment or any that have roaming profiles. The vulnerabilities that prompted the last two patches (would have been 10.0.2 and 10.0.3) have been forgone by Adobe, because "Protected Mode mitigates those vulenrabilities". See here: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb11-06.html
and here: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa11-02.html
In my opinion, Reader X is not ready, they are soliciting for testers for a new release. Version 9 with its attendant problems seems to be the only viable solution for me, if I can get the patches to apply properly, and the installer to work properly.

Problem seen after 1.1.4 upgrade

Hi,
Anyone else experiencing the following:
1. Put iPod Touch to sleep (with WiFi enabled).
2. Switch off our home's wireless modem.
3. Wake up iPod Touch.
4. iPod Touch freezes and have to restart.
Happens now for both my girlfriend and I after the 1.1.4 upgrade.
Thanks, B.

Thanks for that. Although I think it is the responsibility of the software to behave intelligently and not just bomb out. I like to turn my modem off at night and any other appliances to save electricity.

Last two days cannot load/search in cooliris . . . any problems reported?

Cool Iris is blank when it loads and does not allow searching either . . . this just happened two days ago and, no, I did not download any newer/incompatible versions of Firefox . . . any recent problems? Thanks.

Cooliris is compatible with latest Firefox 10.0.x version
* [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Template:clearCookiesCache/ Clear Cookies & Cache]
-> Update Firefox to the latest version 10.0.1
* [[Installing Firefox on Mac]]
-> Cooliris 1.12.3.58254
* https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cooliris/
Check and tell if its working.

Problem syncing after 7.7.03 upgrade

i have a long list of subscribed podcasts that i use on 2 different ipods.
i just DLd and installed v. 7.7.0.43 and restarted my machine. i got a norton prompt and i said allow.
problem: in the specific ipod interface, on the podcast tab, i checked some of the newer podcasts and unchecked some of the older in order to make sure i had room. it took three tries to be able to start the synch because of not enough space. i was finally successful, but discovered that my classic had some things that i had not checked, nor had i ever checked them for the classic, because i DL them for my nano.
does anybody have any idea why the itunes is ignoring my specifications for which podcasts to sync to the ipod?

iOS 7 requires iTunes 11.1 on your computer. If you have not already done so, update iTunes on your computer to 11.1. Then connect your iPad again and go through the restore procedure.

After BI 7.0 Upgrade, Roles and profiles are not visible

Hi Gurus,
                              We have issue with the roles and profiles, all our users doesnt see any roles or profiles in Bex Analyzer, under there user access after BI 7.0 Upgrade.
                               When I go and check there profile in SU01 and I can see all roles are assigned but not able to see in the Bex Analyzer reporting tool.
                               Do we need to do any configuration settings after BI 7.0 upgrade to visible roles. This problem with every user.
                               Your help will be really appreciated.
Thanks
Ganesh Reddy.
Edited by: Ganesh Reddy on Oct 22, 2009 5:19 PM

Hi Mohan/Vijay,
                        Sorry for little bit late. I have all authorization roles access, and users dont have that access. Difference between our roles is I have SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW.
                        But when they login with old bex analyzer they can see all roles, but not with new bex analyzer.
                        Please some suggest me still I need to run SU25.
Thanks
Dayaker Reddy.
Edited by: Ganesh Reddy on Oct 26, 2009 10:19 AM

I have a mac with os x 10.6.8, should I upgrade it to os x 10.9.is there any problem which can occur after upgrading my os.

I have a mac with os x 10.6.8, should I upgrade it to os x 10.9.is there any problem which can occur after upgrading my os.

It is best to wait till there is a 10.9.1 update as new OS X systems always cause problems to some installations. Better not to risk losing data unless you have a bootable clone that enables you to revert to the original (pre upgrade) state. Haste makes waste.
Check this thread if you wish to see what I am talking about.
https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os/os_x_mavericks

I just upgraded to iTunes 12 and had all sorts of problems. After several restores I seem to be able to sync my iPad with iTunes BUT I can't delete anything off my iPad from iTunes. Any ideas on what to do?

I just upgraded to iTunes 12 and had all sorts of problems. After several restores I seem to be able to sync my iPad with iTunes BUT I can't delete anything off my iPad from iTunes. Any ideas on what to do?

-Me again - it also won't upload the few new pictures I have on the computer onto the iPad without deleting all the photos that are already there....

I have a mac, would like to upgrade to mountain lion from mac os x, anybody experienced any problems after this upgrade, thanks

i have a mac, would like to upgrade to mountain lion from mac os x, anybody experienced any problems after this upgrade, thanks

Check that your computer is compatible with Mountain Lion.
To check the model number hold down the option/alt key, go to the Apple menu and select System Information.
iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) model number 7,1 or higher
MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) model number 5,1 or higher
MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer) model number 2,1 or higher
Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer) model number 3,1 or higher
Xserve (Early 2009) model number 3,1 or higher
Your Mac needs:
OS X v10.6.8 or OS X Lion already installed
2 GB or more of memory (More is better - 4 GB minimum seems to be the consensus)
8 GB or more of available space
If you can/do upgrade, I recommend you make a copy of the installer and move it out of your Applications folder. The installer self-destructs. The copy will keep you from having to download the installer again. You can make a bootable DVD/USB stick to install using this free program.
Bootable Drive DVD or USB Flash Drive – Lion Diskmaker
Our 2 computers haven't experienced any significant problems, even though others have. I find it much better than 10.7 Lion, which I used for a week before reverting to 10.6.8
Mavericks is supposed to be released this fall, so you may want to wait.

Problems After Win 8.1 Upgrade - Two Additional Partitions Both With Same Volume Serial Number?

An update from Win 8 Pro to Win 8.1 Pro has occurred automatically on one of my machines.
Prior to the upgrade (from memory) the machine had an OEM Partition (40MB), EFI System Partition (500MB), Recovery Partition (8.17GB) and OS (C:) partition. Only the latter was visible in Computer.
After the 8.1 upgrade there are two additional partitions, Recovery (500MB) and Recovery (450MB). All the partitions are now displayed in This PC as drives except the 40MB OEM Partition.
When viewed in This PC both the two new drives (that appear to equate to the new partitions) show as 499MB each with the same amount of free space. In Disk Management the first new partition is shown as 500MB and the second as 450MB.
I have SugarSync installed on this machine and since the upgrade it is displaying an error telling me it won't work because the two new drives have the same Volume Serial Numbers.
Clearly something has gone wrong with the upgrade:
Is there any way to resolve the Volume Serial Number conflict?
Is there any way to stop all these drives appearing in This PC?
Do I need the two new partitions and if not how can I get rid of them?

There is a fourth path to upgrading to Windows 8.1 provided by Microsoft. Microsoft have been displaying automated reminders from time to time on Windows 8 computers that Windows 8.1 update is available to download - from these reminders it is possible to
choose either Install or Not Now. Just recently these reminders have changed, they are instead notifying the user that the Windows 8.1 Update will be installed automatically or the user has options to postpone the installation for 1hr, 2hrs, etc. The
user of this computer tells me she went away from the machine and Windows 8.1 update installed automatically from one of these prompts.
I have seen these installation prompts on several of my customer's computers and they are not malware related (I deal with malware removal every day and would recognise this). However, I have scanned this computer with Bit Defender and MalwareBytes and there
are no infections present.
The only difference between this Windows 8.1 Update and the others that I have carried out is that it wasn't controlled and therefore I wasn't able to disable the security software (Bit Defender Internet Security 2015). This may be the cause of the problem.
I've uploaded the two screenshots you asked for - the two new drives are W: and Z: and SugarSync is reporting that they have the same Volume Serial Numbers. Note: X: and Y: were not visible prior to the upgrade.
There are two Windows Update logs at C:\Windows\ so I will upload both.

Reporting issues after SP1 to R2 upgrade

Hi Guys.
I'm having an issue with reporting after upgrading System Center 2012 Configuration Manager SP1 to R2 CU2.
For some reason SSRS is not allowing users to logon from a remote workstation. The Reporting node in the Monitoring workspace does not list any reports. The SSRS reporting portal prompts for authentication but does not accept any credentials. Both
are accessible when logged on to the Primary Site Server where SQL and SSRS are installed.
After some investigation I’ve determined that this is a permissions issue and this is where I need your combined wisdom. At first I thought this might be as simple as adding the proper RBAC permissions but if it was permissions issue for my account then
why would it be accessible from the site server but not a remote client….
Some techy info for you.
With the R2 Upgrade a few new permissions were required for the SSRS service account in order for RBAC to work with Reporting. The service account has been added to the Domain Built in group “Windows Authorization Access” and has the “Read TokenGroupsGlobalAndUniversal”
AD attribute set to “Allow”. These are the permissions Microsoft has listed for the Service Account in the TechNet Library.
The SRSRP.log has a ton of errors that I believe may be the cause of the problem. The error is “Unable to translate SID [SID for Account] error: [Some or all identity references could not be translated.] SMS_STS_REPORTING_POINT 9/9/2014
4:51:00 PM 5300 (0x14B4)” which I believe to be a logon failure error. Each time a user try's to authenticate with the site this error is generated.
So I’m thinking this may be a permissions issue with the Service Account that runs SSRS or the SQL Engine may also require a Service Account.
At this point I’m thinking the SQL Engine may also require an AD service account, but before I create another Service Account I wanted to consult the IT Geniuses and see what kind of incite you may have.
Thanks for your help,
Gabe

Hi Guys,
One of our SQL DBA's was able to resolve the issue. It turned out to be a Kerberos Authentication problem with SSRS.
Cause :
The problem was due to Kerberos authentication. Kerberos is an authentication protocol that allows clients that create authentication tokens to associate a specific destination to that token. In this case there is a mismatch between the destination
specified in the token and the report server process configuration. Due to this mismatch, the underlying Kerberos authentication scheme supported by Windows prevents report server from authenticating the user.
Resolution:
1-Remove RSWindowsNegotiate and ensure RSWindowsNTLM is specified in the file rsreportserver.config and save the config file 2-Stop and start SQL server and reporting services.

Problem in displaying reports after migrating 6i to 9i

Hi,
I have migrated the Oracle Reports 6i on NT to 9i running on Solaris. While I don't have any problems in accessing some reports on the web in PDF format, for certain reports it gave me a small dialogue box to install Thai text support. After clicking cancel, it shows 'Terminated with error: REP-300: invalid column name SELECT ....'
Is it due to the incompatibility of 6i and 9i ?
or do I need to recompile the .rdf files ?
Your fast response is apprecciated.
Thanks.
Jikur

according to your description you did two things at once, changed platform and upgraded product version.
although reports 6i and 9i are compatible and you should be able to run 6i reports without any changes in 9i, we always suggest that you re-compile your RDFs on the new version.
also the change from NT to unix could have something with your behaviour. i would check if the re-compile of your reports helps. if not, please contact oracle support services for further investigation.
regards,
philipp

Any problems reported after RH 8.01 upgrade?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for