Anyway to increase Dreamweaver CC performance?

Hi guys, I'm liking Dreamweaver CC but after 3 or 4 hundred lines of code and multiple ccs and javascript files included in this project I'm working on I started to notice the performance started to decline. I'm now at over 1500 lines of code and when I go to create a new line of code and click to go from one end of my css file to the other I have to sit and wait 4-5 seconds just to do basic things which is starting to be a pain. Is there anyway I can throw more resources at the program like you can in photoshop? I'm running a 64bit system dual core 3GHZ, 16GIG DDR2, 2GIG video card and the HDD's are SSD's. Any help would be great

Generally, QuickTime (..and iMovie..) seems to use just one CPU at a time. So on a 4-processor machine it appears to swap its work between the four, as in..
..rather than dividing or spreading the work simultaneousl;y between them all, and with none of them reaching 100%.
That's just how the programs are - presently - written.

Similar Messages

Bought apple iphone 4s 16gb in error from family member, but wanted 32gb. Is there anyway to increase space, as planning to use a lot for music and photos

Bought iphone 4s 16gb from family member in error. Wanted 32gb as present for daughter
Is there anyway to increase space as need lots for photos and music, other than deleting stuff!!

harryham12 wrote:
Bought iphone 4s 16gb from family member in error. Wanted 32gb as present for daughter
Is there anyway to increase space as need lots for photos and music, other than deleting stuff!!
No.

Increase Apply Process Performance

Dear All,
I want to know how can I increase Apply Process Performance in Oracle Streams Setup.
I use Windows 2003 and Oracle 10g R2

Check metalink Note:335516.1
HTH...

How do I increase Logic's performance.

Gday. I have a MBP 2.4GHz 2GB. Will adding another 2GB or RAM reduce the -10011 Errors of System overload? They are more CPU errors as I'm aware? Also, what about a faster hard drive, will that increase Logic's performance?
Cheers.

Hi,
Adding more memory may improve performance. That depends on what your projects look like and what sort of instruments you use.
A faster harddrive always helps improving things for audio files based actions (recording, playing back, using sampled instruments).
Are you familiar with the buffer settings? Bigger buffer means more latency but generally also less to no overloads. Keep I/O safety buffer disabled. That feature appears to benefit only low spec systems like mine.
Also you can disable the overload warning alltogether here:
If Logic stops unasked, it has an overload - I guess you know that now.
regards, Erik.
Message was edited by: Eriksimon

Dreamweaver CS6 performs very slowly when using Bootstrap

I'm working with a Bootstrap template that includes alot of JavaScript and CSS files, and Dreamweaver CS6 performs EXTREMELY SLOWLY when working with this site.
It takes a few seconds to be able to scroll, especially when working in "Split" view, and everytime I want to Preview the page in a browser I must save the file and then wait 2-5 seconds for the save to complete before I hit Preview or else Dreamweaver will crash.
I've checked for updates to Dreamweaver CS6 but my copy seems to be up-to-date.
Any suggestions?

Dreamweaver performs very slowly.
This depends on a number of factors.
The operating system - apparently the latest version of Mac OS causes all sorts of problems
Processor
RAM
Disk space
External links to scripts and style sheets
In my case, I do not have a problem other than the normal ones
Windows 8.1
i7
16GB
2T
local files

Is there anyway to increase your hardrive on your iphone?

Hey
i was wondering, say you have a 8gb iphone, is there any possible way to increase that 8gb?

"Is there anyway to increase your hardrive on your iphone?"
The iPhone does not have a "hardrive".

Will it still increase my comps performance?

Hello one question if I add 512md ddr pc3200 will it still increase my computers performance if I already have 1gb of ram.....for example FPS on HL2?

Quote
Originally posted by TechHead
Hi,
No, won't make a whole lot of difference the major improvement would come from upgrading your video card but for a start try some omega/dna drivers
http://www.valancestudio.com
http://www.omegacorner.com
Hope thats of some use
Take Care
Hi, are the OMEGA drivers different from the ones from the ATI website? if so are they better? wots the corrolation with using ATI TOOL (to overclcock) and the OMEGA DRIVERS? btw please note this is for a 9800Pro ...

Will more memory increase my iMac performance ?

will more memory increase my iMac performance ?

Depends.
Adding RAM only makes it possible to run more programs concurrently. It doesn't speed up the computer nor make games run faster. What it can do is prevent the system from having to use disk-based VM when it runs out of RAM because you are trying to run too many applications concurrently or using applications that are extremely RAM dependent. It will improve the performance of applications that run mostly in RAM or when loading programs.

How does one increase Dreamweaver text of my reading material?

How does one increase the Dreamweaver text size for it's instructions etc.?

The font sizes in the Dreamweaver user interface are controlled by the system fonts on your computer. The only way to increase them is to increase the size of the system fonts. In Windows, you do that through the Control Panel. MAC may be different

Increase Query Designer Performance?

Hi together,
Is it possible to increase the performance of the Query Designer? I have a query which is based on a MultiProvider with several InfoCubes. If i work some minutes with the Query Designer, it becomes slower and slower. Then it takes from one up to ten seconds to see the digit in my formula, which i pressed on the keyboard just before. This is very awful! At least the half of the time i work with the Query Designer i have to wait, that this tool stops calculating something or displaying the hourglass. Very inefficient.
Thanks for hints in advance!

>
Ricardo Rosa wrote:
> Hi Timo,
>
> Usually this kind of issue should be solved with frontend patch upgrade, have you tried to reproduce this with latest FEP?
>
> Other suggestion which should help is to search for RSZ tables inconsistencies with report ANALYZE_RSZ_TABLES, this can search for inconsistencies which can decrease the performance in the query definition and also suggest a fix for that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ricardo
Hi Ricardo,
Yes, i've already upgraded to latest FEP version.
But thank you for this report. It looks very helpful!
>
Arun Varadarajan wrote:
> Shikha,
> The question was regarding Query designer performance and not query performance...
>
> We faced similar issue earlier - even opening of Query designer took a huge amount of time but then on upgrading upgrading my system to 1 GB ram most of the performance issue went away... check the RAM usage in the task manager and CPU utilization. This might make query designer faster.
Hi Arun,
At this point there is no more hope for me, as my system has already 2 GB RAM and a dual core cpu with 2.2 GHz.

Increase the Insert performance while using th e DBlink

Dear Friends ,
I am trying to insert 4 lacs records into a table by using the DB-Link.It is taking very long time ( 1hour) to insert the records,is there any other way where to increase the performance.
This is my insert statement.
insert /*+ APPEND PARALLEL NOLOGGING */ into target_table
select * from source_table@dblink_name

There is little chance alter table your_table noparallel would help (if parallel keyword was specified at table creation)
It seems you'll have to be more specific (I consider using parallelism as the last resort so consequently I don't have much experience)
- is this a one time job ?
there are several other methods (export/import, datapump, external tables ...) to get the job done
- is this a regular procedure ?
is it feasible to use methods mentioned above
- how frequently has to be performed ?
is it still feasible to use methods mentioned above (taking dblink performance as not acceptable)
- is it mandatory to transfer 400 000 rows from the other database ?
wouldn't be better to pull from the other database just the rows you need ?
wouldn't be better to make the other database the driving site ?
Regards
Etbin
Edited by: Etbin on 25.12.2011 13:30
Try to remove (not sure if it can be done) the status answered as others would think no other contributions are needed
you are supposed to mark the thread answered when you think a satisfactory solution from your point of view has been provided. Take a look at FAQ link (on upper right)

Increase IFS/CMS Performance by changing db Parameters

Can anyone help me by identifying which Oracle database parameter should i change to increase performance relating to working with files in cms?
Such as file retrieval, editing and saving.
Not raletd to optimising the network.
Thanks

Did u find how to do that ?
i need it too.

Increase interface for performance

Hi expert,
I know (but it could be wrong) that over 100 connection per second, I could add one more network interface. For example create 2 different listner on 2 separated ETHn
I'd like to know if there is a best practise for to decide how many interface I can configure on my system (Red Hat with Oracle 11g EE)
Thanks for any suggest.
Cheers,
Lain

Lain wrote:
Sure! Ok I mean that it could be a pool size from an middleware for a total of 100 (more, i think 200) connection established, with a frequency of 100 request per sec. Then I think an 100 (or 200) tcp packets for sec. NO 100 TCP_SYN, I explained wrongly, sorry!In that case, the number of network connections is trivial. And Oracle can easily support 1000+ client sessions (assuming a proper config).
ok for example a gigabit interface, from an application server to database server, point to point, without any layer.
In this scenario, Can I set 2 listener on 2 NIC? have I a benefit with an increase of the NIC? or for Oracle it is the same? (1 listener on 1 nic)I fail to see what an additional NIC or Listener will provide you in terms of performance - unless the latency and bandwidth of the wire protocol using the existing network infrastructure and NIC lacks. And with a GigE interface, that should not be the case.
Consider what a 2nd NIC and Listener will buy. It does not change the number of socket handles on the app server or the database server (same number of total client-server connections). It does not reduce the amount of traffic that will be exchanged between client and server. It does not reduce the server or client resource utilisation - the opposite in fact on the server as server resources are required for a 2nd Listener and a 2nd NIC.
So what does this 2nd NIC and Listener then address? Basically, the pieces of wire between the client and the server. Is the existing wire a problem ito bandwidth and latency and dropped packets?
Run a wire sniffer between client and server, put a test load on from client on the server, and determine if there are problem at wire level. If not, then why even consider "fixing" something that is working fine and not broken? To be honest - I would not even bother with this as there are far more important moving parts to get right than mucking about with the physical network level in such a case. Like using sharable SQL and bind variables. Like making the decision on how to use dedicated server or shared server models. Making sure the app layer does not leak ref cursors on the server layer. Etc.

HOW DOES COMPRESSION OF AN INFOCUBE INCREASE THE LOAD PERFORMANCE?

Hi all
I see that Compression of infocube is one of the parameters to improve/increase load performance. If I am not wrong, Can some one please explain how compressing a cube improves the load performance?
Thanks in advance
Rishi

Hi,
I see that Compression of infocube is one of the parameters to improve/increase load performance. If I am not wrong, Can some one please explain how compressing a cube improves the load performance?
As per my information Compression improves the Quaer performance not loading perforamnce
when u do compression the same characterstics which are having the same values those records will be moved to E Fact table
ex Custno   Mat NO Qty   Value
      C101     M101     10      100
      c101     m101      20      200
when u do comperession the recors will be compressed as below
c101   m101 30 300
when the query execution instead of reading two reocrds and compressing at the time of producing output at report level
but when already compressed it fetchs one record directly form E table like that the query perforamnce will be improved.
Not loading perforamnce.
Thansk & regards,
sathish

How to increase my server performance ?

hi experts,
my environment is 4.7E,SQL,Windows 2003 Server with 150 users.
ibm xseries 346 with 6 gb ram
min response time is 1000 (m.sec) to 1500 per 140 logon users.
how can i decrease this response time ?
Please give me your valuable suggestions.
Gayatry.

Hello Gayatri,
The average response time consists of:
Wait time
Database request time
Roll time
Load time
Enqueue time
Processing time is:
    ABAP processing time (part of total CPU time)
    Work process waiting for CPU
    Waiting for I/O
IN order to monitor the performance of the system and identifying the bottleneck points, use Workload Monitor transaction code ST03. Select the required timeframe and by default the Workload Overview view is displayed. In the Administrators Mode the default time frame of the workload analysis is the current day. However, change to Expert Mode. Choose under Detailed Analysis -> Last minutes load
During the workload exercise, restrict the time period to the time when the performance is observed to be bad. Under Analysis views, you can access, for example:
Workload overview - Workload statistics according to work process type
Transaction Profile - Workload statistics according to transaction.
Time Profile - Workload statistics according to hour
In the Workload Monitor(ST03) selecting Transaction Profile enables you to find out:
The most-used transactions. Tuning these transactions results in the largest improvements in overall performance.
The average response times for typical R/3 transactions.
In the Workload Monitor, the following values normally indicate good performance:
Wait time < 10% response time
Average roll-in time < 20 ms
Average roll wait time < 200 ms
Average load (and generation) time < 10 % of response time (<50 ms)
Average database request time < 40 % of (response time - wait time)
Average CPU time < 40 % of (response time - wait time)
Average CPU time should be close to processing time
Average response time - depends on your requirements there is no general rule
If you observe high response time for these individual components :
Large Roll-wait time: Communication problem with GUI or external system
Large load time: Program buffer, CUA buffer, or Screen buffer too small
Large database request times: CPU or memory bottleneck on database server, network problems, expensive SQL statements, database locks, missing indexes, missing statistics, small buffers
Large CPU times: Expensive ABAP processing, for example, processing large tables, frequent accessing of R/3 buffers
Processing time much larger than CPU time: CPU bottlenecks, network problems, communication problems.
Hope this helps in tuning your system
Regards
Tanuj Gupta

Anyway to increase Dreamweaver CC performance?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for