AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction

Hello AP Guru's-
I have a situation where were are adding line items to an invoice with a PO.  The tax jurisdiction code is correct but when we add a G/L, it is pulling the wrong tax jurisdiction code?  Where is SAP pulling this tax jurisdiction code from?  I assume from Vendor Master but it is wrong?  Shouldn't it match the PO?
Thanks!

Upon reviewing the Plant Master data- I found that the PO is pulling the Tax code from by the Plant.  However, when the user attempts to add a line item, it is pulling the PO by the Co.code.  I am still working on this but it doesn't make any sense.  I would expect SAP to be logical in that it would be consistent by PO or by Vendor. 
What is the standard 'best practices' method here?
I would suspect that it would be by PO and not by company code via MIRO?
But I did confirm that the PO is by Plant and not Vendor which is correct.  In addition, I could not find a way to remove the tax code by plant but I may not want to do that anyway. 
My users don't like that the tax code in MIRO when they add a GL line item does not match the PO.
Any suggestions?

Similar Messages

  • AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction in FB60

    Hello Gurus-
    I have a problem/ puzzle I cannot figure out.
    For AP invoices, the Tax Jurisdiction is determined by Ship to and all is good.  However, when AP attempts to add freight to an invoice via t-code FB60, the tax juirisdiction defaults to plant which is wrong.
    Can this be changed to mirror the ship to?  Is there a solution to this?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    In FB60, you can not link to Ship to party as it is FI transaction and not related to SD.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Creation of Budget Billing Plan for Countries with Tax Jurisdiction

    Hello Experts,
    When I create a budget billing plan for a company code with country Canada/USA and jursidiction TAXCAJ/TAXUSJ using transaction EA61, I get the message "Taxes with jurisdiction code not permitted with down payments"(Message no. >0194).  The long text for this message says "Delete your entry in the field for jurisdiction code"  Is any one aware where from this jurisdiction code should be deleted.
    Is it possible to create budget billing plan for countries with jurisdiction code at all ?
    Thanks in advance
    Venkat

    Hello Roopali,
    What I learnt in the process of exploring the functionality is that Payment PLan (BBP or AMB) is the budget billing method for countries with Tax Jurisdiction. Statistical, Partial & Payment Scheme only works when jurisdiction is not defined for tax procedure. Payment scheme is the recommend procedure for Eurpopean market
    Thanks for your clarification
    Best Regards
    Venkat

  • Issue with Taxes getting Posted to Customer Account in case o Free of Charg

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement in our project where we need to pay tax to government on   giving free of charge items to customers in a Sales order along with normal items.
    But the tax should be not be charged to customer but to be born by us ( Selling company).( Since itu2019s a free of charge   , so customer should not pay the tax)
    The Legal  rule  is that tax should  be calculated on Cost of Goods .
    We have done the necessary configuration to calculate this tax but when the  account posting happen this tax is getting charged to customer account .
    We want to change the configuration so that this should not be charged to customer but to be paid by us,
    For example .
    Product Selling Price = 1000 GBP
    Free of charge , so 100 % discount = -1000 GBP
    Net value of item  = 0 GBP
    Cost of Good  = 100 GBP
    Tax rate = 15 %
    Tax = 15 GBP
    This 15 GBP should not be charged to customer account   but to be paid by Selling company.
    If anyone has faced a similar scenario  and can give some  pointers, please suggest.
    Regards,
    Divyanshu

    Dear friend,
      Maintain R100 condition type ie 100% discount in the last step of your pricing procedure, so when ever you sell item with TANN item category the value will become ZERO. Try this and let use know.
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • Tax Jurisdiction / Assignment column

    Hello Experts,
    I have issue with tax jurisdiction with assigment coulumn,
    Ex: I have posted document using  Tcode F-43.
    I have credited the vendor for the amount 500 , then debited GL Account 250 with Tax code U1 (cost center 1214500) and again debited same GL account tax code U1 but different cost center.
    After posting, if i check in FB03 for these doucment # only second line item GL accounts juridiction is displaying in  assigment  field . It should show the correct jurisdiction code in assignment field as  per line item.
    Thanks
    Guru

    Tax Jurisdiction code is avble in the coding block itself. You a taxable line item you can make the Jurisdiction code avbl in reports.instead of using a sort key

  • How to Bypass Tax Jurisdiction Code  while Posting FI Document

    Hello All,
       I have a requirement where I can enter Tax code along with Tax Jurisdiction for some of the cases while Posting FI Document using T code s FB01.. etc.
    However for  one scenario I need to BY pass the Tax Jurisdiction while posting FI Document . How to achieve this.
      As  per SAP once we define Tax Jurisdiction it is mandatory to enter as Input to Post the document.
      But I need to control this Tax Jurisdiction as I dont want to enter  while posting FI Document.It should not prompt for Tax Jurisdiction .
      How to make an option field in this case (Based on Company code and Tax code combination).
      Any BADI / User exit/BTE to Ignore the Error message Enter Tax Jurisdiction code).
    Please help me as soon as possible.
    Thanks.

    My Query is , when am posting a document in FB01 Transaction , when I enter Tax code at line item level, Tax jurisdiction is mandatory if we dont enter it give an error saying that ' Please enter a Tax Jurisdiction' .
       My requirement is I would like to bypass that error without entering Tax jurisdiction I would like to proceed by providing default Tax Jurisdiction through any userexit/BADI/BTE. so that I will not get that error .
       So any USER-EXIT/BTE/BADI is there which will trigger before the error(maintain tax jurisdiction )  at line Item leve ?????
    I hope now requirement is clear.

  • PO Tax Jurisdiction Code defaulted from Plant but then overwritten by CC

    Hello everyone!
    I had a question regarding defaulting the tax jurisdiction code.  When using ME21N the tax jurisdiction code is defaulting from the value we have in the plant which is what we want.  When I go and fill in the additional information that the PO needs to be saved (such as GL, Cost Center, etc.) it is overwriting the defaulted plant tax jurisdiction code and changing it to the Company Codes default jurisdiciton code.  Is there a way to NOT have the company code value enter?  I just want it to remain as the plant Tax jurisdcition code.
    Thank you,
    Rob

    please read the OSS Note 501054 - FAQ: Taxes in purchasing
    How is the tax jurisdiction code (tax jurisdiction code) determined in purchase orders?
    Answer:
    You activate the tax handling with tax jurisdiction codes in FI Customizing (transaction OBCO). In the standard system during the creation of a purchase order, the system consideres the following sources for the tax jurisdiction code: Reference item, request for quotation, contract, plant, the account assignment object. During this process, the system overwrites the respective preceding value in this list. If, for example, you have maintained a tax jurisdiction code with the account assignment object for a purchase order item, this entry "wins" as opposed to the entry in the plant table. Besides this, the tax jurisdiction code can be entered manually.
    If you use the function from Note 493515, also the tax jurisdiction code from the delivery address can be taken into account (see below.).
    There is more useful info in this note, as well for jurisdiction code

  • Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

    HI,
    I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
    1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
    2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
    3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
    Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
    Thanking you.

    Dear
    Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice.  Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions. 
    Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right.  Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
    If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
    Regards

  • Tax jurisdiction code creates a difference when posting invoice with PO ref

    I have added a tax jurisdiction code since the client wants to be able to sort taxes by location.  The problem now is that, I have posted a PO with a tax jurisdiction code but upon posting the invoice with reference to this PO, there's an error saying that there still exists a balance even though the balance on the screen is zero.  Any ideas on how this can be solved?

    Hi ,
    Can you please tell us how you resolved? We do facing the same problem.
    Thanks
    Ganesh

  • Tax issue with Direct Input mode of RFBIBL00

    Hi, I have a problem using <b>RFBIBL00</b> (direct input mode) to create A/R invoices. There is no tax associated with the invoice, however, when I use direct input mode, instead of posting immediately, a batch input session is created. In the log, an <b>information</b> message: <i>'Specify a tax jurisdiction key'</i>. The BDC session is processed with no error.
    When using Call transaction mode for RFBIBL00, the document is posted immediately but the requirement is to use Direct input mode.
    There is no converted data in the BBTAX structure since the doc. does not need to post to tax account. Do I need to populate the Tax amount, Tax code and jurisdiction code in this structure and BBSEG in order to by pass the information message?
    Any advice is appreciated.
    - Minami

    Problem solved. Just need to untie the relationship between the ITEM import structure and the BBTAX so the Direct Input program will not require a tax jurisdiction code.

  • Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

    Hi Gurus,
    I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
    In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
    While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
    Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
    Message no. F5786
    Diagnosis
    You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
    System Response
    You cannot enter this kind of document.
    Procedure
    Enter the transaction in two documents.
    For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
    The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
    Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
    JBC.

    Hi Mamta,
    Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
    For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
    I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
    Posting        GL                   Co Code
    Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
    Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
    For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
    I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
    Thanks,
    Bapu

  • Tax Jurisdiction issues in AR Invoice Creation

    MODULE = AR
    EBS Version = R12.1
    EBS Tax is setup
    Hi All
    I am currently trying to mimic the functionality in the front end of AR Transaction workbench from the back end via Auto Invoice process
    From the front end+
    When I manually create an invoice and create an invoice line, I get 3 tax lines automatically created. These 3 lines correspond to the State, City and County Tax .
    The values I get for Tax fields are =>
    Tax Regime Code = US_SALES_USE_TAX,
    Tax = CITY, COUNTY or STATE,
    TAX Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample)
    Rate = (1.0, 4.0, 2.0) (Sample)
    and so on
    Backend*
    Now from the backend, I am trying to convert legacy invoices using AutoInvoice.
    So when I pass the values of Tax Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample) for my 3 tax lines, I get an error of undefined Tax Jurisdiction.
    Of course when I query the jurisdictions table, ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B, these values are not defined.
    So the question is how do these values get populated from the front end but not from the back end.
    I want to create tax lines and tax amounts from the legacy data and show the tax amounts as they are brought over from data extract i.e. I do not want EBS tax to calculate tax for me - rather just let me pass amounts in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table
    I have read the metalink id 731149.1 and I am basically using that to create manual tax lines. If I pass one of the values that is defined in the ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B table, I am able to create a tax line, but the jurisdiction code defined there are wierd ( sample jurisdiction defined = ST-370000000)
    Bottom line is that the ZX_JURISDICTIONS table does not have state, city county names defined in the table but it still shows them when tax lines are automatically created for manual invoices.
    When I try to populate those in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table I get an error.
    Thanks
    Also is it possible to post screenshots in Oracle Forums ?
    Edited by: user13293643 on Aug 30, 2010 8:19 AM

    From my point of view you have only 1 chance:
    - Find a criteria of the imported invoices, which is avaible in the Tax Rules as condition (e.g. specific transaction types or you used a specific tax code by the import)
    - Put the tax line manual in the Autoinvoice from the frond end system
    - Defined a rule for each tax in the EBS Tax manager: Principell logic: If Tax_Code/transaction type = ABC then tax non-applicable
    Which this rule, no standard tax code is selected by EBS Tax, the tax is disable for the transaction and only the imported tax lines are booked.
    By my last customer I had the same problem and we have investigate many time.
    We have used for the imported invoices special tax codes and these tax code used for the disable of the tax in the tax rules.

  • POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT with tax holding base amount issue.

    Hello Experts,
    There is existing custom program which taking input from excel file and by using POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT FM they are posting Vendor Doc.
    Now they want to add with tax holding base amount to be add based on Tax Code. Through recording i got fieldname like WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD
    (tax code) and WITH_DIALG-WT_BASE (BASE AMOUNT).
    I'm using above field names and passing values to table of structure FTPOST, but its not working. is there any other way to make this work
    i found one table of structure FTTAX  (Taxes for Internal Posting Interface) can it be useful to achieve the goal????
    Thanks in Advance to all. 

    Uhm
    As you can see you've two codes for every wt lines, the first code is not editable
    Both the codes are the same values:
    - First CB, CB
    - Second CF, CF
    The wt codes you need to transfer to your posting are from master data (I don't know if it's for vendor, LFBW, or customer, KNBW)
    I suppose the order to show the wt depends on how they are set in master data
    Now, I've never used fm POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT directly, but it's used by BI standard RFBIBL00 and I've used it many many times.
    Usually the lines of wt have to have both codes, if it doesn't need to fill a code, this code has to fill with 'blank'
    So if It moved the wt for RFBIL00:
    - CB lines:
    WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CB'
    WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = SPACE
    WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 0.
    - CF lines:
    WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CF'
    WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = 'CF'
    WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 500.
    I repeat this is how the wt lines should be preparated for RFBIBL00, but this program calls POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT so I suppose it should be preparated in the same way.
    You can also considere to use RFBIBL00 instead of fm
    Max

  • Tax Jurisdiction Error While Doing ABZON -AssetTransaction

    Hi,
    While implementing the SAP,we have defined the Tax Jurisdiction Codes with 9 digits.After that client requested to change the Tax Jurisdiction Code to 10 digits and we removed 9 digits and Created Tax Jurisdiction with 10 digits and moved to Production System.
    Now the Issue is- While doing the asset transaction in ABZON transaction code,System is giving the below error messange Tax Code I0 does not exist for jurisdiction code LA0000000.Kindly help me how to solve this issue.
    Error Message is - Message no.FF718
    NOTE:- In the above issue it is giving the error with 9 Digits Tax Jurisdiction code LA0000000 which does not exists in the system.
    My Doubt is - Why the system is not picking the 10 digits Tax Jurisdiction Code? *Why it is taking 9 digits tax jurisdiction code even though it was deleted from the system?
    Kindly advice me how to fix this Issue?
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi,
    Thanks for your quick response.I have checked in the FTXP and found that there is no Tax Jurisdiction codes with 9 digits.
    I have a doubt -why this error came- Initially we have created Tax codes with 9 digits Tax Jurisdiction Codes.After that we did not do any changes to the Tax codes which are already created & then Deleted all 9 Digits Tax Jurisdiction codes to create 10 Digits Tax Jurisdiction codes.Finally we created 10 digits tax jurisdiction codes and used the Old tax codes which are already created at that time of 9 digits Tax Jurisdiction Code.
    Kindly think of my doubt i raised above and suggest me weather that could be the reason for the error?
    Thanks
    Supriya

  • Tax Jurisdiction Code Check as part of a Sales Order Partner Function

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where we modify partner information directly in the sales order. These partners are simple addresses and are not tax relevant. We have set them up as one-time customers. Every time when we modify the address information, Vertex kicks in and tries to match the address information (street, city and state) with a tax jurisdiction code. In our case the address information is high level (only city and state) which is not enough for Vertex. SAP issues then a blocking error message.
    We try to find a way to ignore Vertex for these specific partners. In the documentation we have found a user exit, as well as a BADI, but our developpers were not able to make it work in the sales oder.
    The user-exit is the following: EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001
    The BADI is the following: IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN
    In EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001, I've found a parameter (EXEMP_IND) which could enable to bypass the tax jurisdiction code check and the RFC call to Vertex.
    In IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN, I've found a parameter (CHECK_ADDRESS) which could potentially bypass the check as well.
    Did any of you already experience this scenario or would you have an idea about how I could make this work?
    Thanks
    Loic

    Unfortunately, the sales order is created through an interface (using iDOCs), and the external system feeding the iDOC for the sales order creation does not have any Zip Code information. Besides, even if the Zip Code is entered, it is still not enough for Vertex to choose automatically a Tax Jurisdiction Code, most of the times, it is also requiring a District, which again, will not be passed from the interface.
    We went through this analysis already and we came to the conclusion that we need to bypass this check, as this partner function is not tax relevant.
    Thanks,
    Loic
    Edited by: Loic Dominik on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cursor in if statement with two sql statements

    if :v_project_number ='ALL' then cursor c1 is select * from gl_je_lines gjl where   nvl(gjl.attribute10,1) in(select decode(:v_project_number,'ALL',nvl(gjl.attribute10,1),:v_project_number) from dual)    else if :v_project_number !='ALL' then cursor

  • Excel file format  to FTP server

    hi all, By using FM's i am able to upload data from SAP to FTP in .XLS format   CALL FUNCTION 'FTP_R3_TO_SERVER'     EXPORTING       handle         = w_hdl       fname          = 'test.xls'      "file path of destination system       character_mode =

  • Azure can we recover a closed account?

    Hey Azure team, We had a pay as you go account on Azure, and our startup Dgtlpost AB got approved for Bizspark, your billing team moved our websites over to new Bizspark account. But our landing page did not get migrated. So when pay as you go acount

  • Can you add and erase applications?

    i am a new iphone user. i previously had a treo 650 and loved it. i used a solitaire game i had on my treo to help me fall asleep as it is so mindless, my brain would rather sleep than be that bored! i have seen many web apps for the iphone, but am n

  • Does N9 support 802.1x with LEAP and have Vietname...

    Hi all, I'm from Vietnam and using a N9 phone. I have some question: 1. Does N9 support 802.1x with LEAP like E-series? When are you launching? 2. Does N9 support Vietnamese language/keyboard/typing? When are you launching? Please inform me soon Than