AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction in FB60

Hello Gurus-
I have a problem/ puzzle I cannot figure out.
For AP invoices, the Tax Jurisdiction is determined by Ship to and all is good. However, when AP attempts to add freight to an invoice via t-code FB60, the tax juirisdiction defaults to plant which is wrong.
Can this be changed to mirror the ship to? Is there a solution to this?
Thank you

Hi,
In FB60, you can not link to Ship to party as it is FI transaction and not related to SD.
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction

Hello AP Guru's-
I have a situation where were are adding line items to an invoice with a PO. The tax jurisdiction code is correct but when we add a G/L, it is pulling the wrong tax jurisdiction code? Where is SAP pulling this tax jurisdiction code from? I assume from Vendor Master but it is wrong? Shouldn't it match the PO?
Thanks!

Upon reviewing the Plant Master data- I found that the PO is pulling the Tax code from by the Plant. However, when the user attempts to add a line item, it is pulling the PO by the Co.code. I am still working on this but it doesn't make any sense. I would expect SAP to be logical in that it would be consistent by PO or by Vendor.
What is the standard 'best practices' method here?
I would suspect that it would be by PO and not by company code via MIRO?
But I did confirm that the PO is by Plant and not Vendor which is correct. In addition, I could not find a way to remove the tax code by plant but I may not want to do that anyway.
My users don't like that the tax code in MIRO when they add a GL line item does not match the PO.
Any suggestions?

Creation of Budget Billing Plan for Countries with Tax Jurisdiction

Hello Experts,
When I create a budget billing plan for a company code with country Canada/USA and jursidiction TAXCAJ/TAXUSJ using transaction EA61, I get the message "Taxes with jurisdiction code not permitted with down payments"(Message no. >0194). The long text for this message says "Delete your entry in the field for jurisdiction code" Is any one aware where from this jurisdiction code should be deleted.
Is it possible to create budget billing plan for countries with jurisdiction code at all ?
Thanks in advance
Venkat

Hello Roopali,
What I learnt in the process of exploring the functionality is that Payment PLan (BBP or AMB) is the budget billing method for countries with Tax Jurisdiction. Statistical, Partial & Payment Scheme only works when jurisdiction is not defined for tax procedure. Payment scheme is the recommend procedure for Eurpopean market
Thanks for your clarification
Best Regards
Venkat

BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with TAX posting for FB60 t-code

Hi Experts,
I am trying upload the data using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with Tax(ACCOUNTTAX) for the FB60 t-code. But not getting right.
Any help on this issue greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Harish

Hi,
Check out this-
FU BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST
Short Text
Accounting: Posting
Functionality
Using this method you can create a posing in accounting for certain business transactions.
Possible ( Business Transactions):
Postings that generally only affect the general ledger. (RFBU)
Billing: For billing in Sales and Distribution, accounting is supplied with the relevant billing data. (SD00) Billing Document
Accounting can use the data of a logistics system that result from an Invoice Receipt. (RMRP)
Goods Movement are triggered by transactions in Sales and Distribution or by inventory postings. Within logistics, they lead to a change in the warehouse stocks of <DS:GLOS.Inventory Management>Inventory Management. This results in a posting in accounting. This is why accounting is supplied with the relevant data from logistics. (RMWA)
Example
Billing document:
By selling goods in accordance with targets, revenue is generated. The revenue is posted in billing and forwarded to accounting.
Invoice receipt:
Raw materials are purchased in accordance with targets. The invoice receipt is posted in a logistics system. The data from the raw materials is forwarded to accounting.
Goods Movment:
The use of raw materials leads to a change in stock in inventory managment. The posting of raw material consumption is forwarded to accounting.
G/L Account Posting:
Provision posting for an expected warranty service. This can refer to acquisitions or retirements belonging to stocks that are not in subledger accounting relevant to inventory management. This is particularly the case if such materials are not displayed as vendor/customer, materials, loans etc. or cannot be displayed in this way. This can also refer to write-ups or depreciation that contain higher aggregations of values than are maintained in a corresponding subledger that is relevant to inventory management.
The conversion of foreign currencies for receivables/payables due to large exchange rate changes that should not lead to an update of the accounts payable or accounts receivable accounting. A similar transaction can arise for the revaluation of raw materials if this revaluation takes place at a correspondingly aggreagated level.
Reclassification of inventory of P&L statement accounts that are only used for reconcilliation purposes in the general ledger (this rearranges values for balance sheet items).
Balance reclassifications of stocks to receivables with different return times.
Notes
If the parameter CurrencyAmount is filled with the currency fields, a complete document check including characteristics and value components of profitability analysis (CO-PA). Otherwise, the account assignment objects are checked.
Messages are returned in the parameter Return. In the parameter documentation you can find the return values and their meaning.
Further information
You can find further information in the SAP Library under "Financials -> Accounting - General (AC) -> Interfaces to Accounting (AC)".
Parameters
DOCUMENTHEADER
CUSTOMERCPD
CONTRACTHEADER
OBJ_TYPE
OBJ_KEY
OBJ_SYS
ACCOUNTGL
ACCOUNTRECEIVABLE
ACCOUNTPAYABLE
ACCOUNTTAX
CURRENCYAMOUNT
CRITERIA
VALUEFIELD
EXTENSION1
RETURN
PAYMENTCARD
CONTRACTITEM
EXTENSION2
REALESTATE
ACCOUNTWT
Reward if useful!

Issue with Taxes getting Posted to Customer Account in case o Free of Charg

Hi All,
We have a requirement in our project where we need to pay tax to government on   giving free of charge items to customers in a Sales order along with normal items.
But the tax should be not be charged to customer but to be born by us ( Selling company).( Since itu2019s a free of charge   , so customer should not pay the tax)
The Legal rule is that tax should be calculated on Cost of Goods .
We have done the necessary configuration to calculate this tax but when the account posting happen this tax is getting charged to customer account .
We want to change the configuration so that this should not be charged to customer but to be paid by us,
For example .
Product Selling Price = 1000 GBP
Free of charge , so 100 % discount = -1000 GBP
Net value of item = 0 GBP
Cost of Good = 100 GBP
Tax rate = 15 %
Tax = 15 GBP
This 15 GBP should not be charged to customer account   but to be paid by Selling company.
If anyone has faced a similar scenario and can give some pointers, please suggest.
Regards,
Divyanshu

Dear friend,
Maintain R100 condition type ie 100% discount in the last step of your pricing procedure, so when ever you sell item with TANN item category the value will become ZERO. Try this and let use know.
Regards,
Sudhir

Tax Jurisdiction / Assignment column

Hello Experts,
I have issue with tax jurisdiction with assigment coulumn,
Ex: I have posted document using Tcode F-43.
I have credited the vendor for the amount 500 , then debited GL Account 250 with Tax code U1 (cost center 1214500) and again debited same GL account tax code U1 but different cost center.
After posting, if i check in FB03 for these doucment # only second line item GL accounts juridiction is displaying in assigment field . It should show the correct jurisdiction code in assignment field as per line item.
Thanks
Guru

Tax Jurisdiction code is avble in the coding block itself. You a taxable line item you can make the Jurisdiction code avbl in reports.instead of using a sort key

How to Bypass Tax Jurisdiction Code while Posting FI Document

Hello All,
   I have a requirement where I can enter Tax code along with Tax Jurisdiction for some of the cases while Posting FI Document using T code s FB01.. etc.
However for one scenario I need to BY pass the Tax Jurisdiction while posting FI Document . How to achieve this.
As per SAP once we define Tax Jurisdiction it is mandatory to enter as Input to Post the document.
But I need to control this Tax Jurisdiction as I dont want to enter while posting FI Document.It should not prompt for Tax Jurisdiction .
How to make an option field in this case (Based on Company code and Tax code combination).
Any BADI / User exit/BTE to Ignore the Error message Enter Tax Jurisdiction code).
Please help me as soon as possible.
Thanks.

My Query is , when am posting a document in FB01 Transaction , when I enter Tax code at line item level, Tax jurisdiction is mandatory if we dont enter it give an error saying that ' Please enter a Tax Jurisdiction' .
   My requirement is I would like to bypass that error without entering Tax jurisdiction I would like to proceed by providing default Tax Jurisdiction through any userexit/BADI/BTE. so that I will not get that error .
   So any USER-EXIT/BTE/BADI is there which will trigger before the error(maintain tax jurisdiction ) at line Item leve ?????
I hope now requirement is clear.

PO Tax Jurisdiction Code defaulted from Plant but then overwritten by CC

Hello everyone!
I had a question regarding defaulting the tax jurisdiction code. When using ME21N the tax jurisdiction code is defaulting from the value we have in the plant which is what we want. When I go and fill in the additional information that the PO needs to be saved (such as GL, Cost Center, etc.) it is overwriting the defaulted plant tax jurisdiction code and changing it to the Company Codes default jurisdiciton code. Is there a way to NOT have the company code value enter? I just want it to remain as the plant Tax jurisdcition code.
Thank you,
Rob

please read the OSS Note 501054 - FAQ: Taxes in purchasing
How is the tax jurisdiction code (tax jurisdiction code) determined in purchase orders?
Answer:
You activate the tax handling with tax jurisdiction codes in FI Customizing (transaction OBCO). In the standard system during the creation of a purchase order, the system consideres the following sources for the tax jurisdiction code: Reference item, request for quotation, contract, plant, the account assignment object. During this process, the system overwrites the respective preceding value in this list. If, for example, you have maintained a tax jurisdiction code with the account assignment object for a purchase order item, this entry "wins" as opposed to the entry in the plant table. Besides this, the tax jurisdiction code can be entered manually.
If you use the function from Note 493515, also the tax jurisdiction code from the delivery address can be taken into account (see below.).
There is more useful info in this note, as well for jurisdiction code

Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

HI,
I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
Thanking you.

Dear
Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice. Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions.
Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right. Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
Regards

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Tax jurisdiction code creates a difference when posting invoice with PO ref

I have added a tax jurisdiction code since the client wants to be able to sort taxes by location. The problem now is that, I have posted a PO with a tax jurisdiction code but upon posting the invoice with reference to this PO, there's an error saying that there still exists a balance even though the balance on the screen is zero. Any ideas on how this can be solved?

Hi ,
Can you please tell us how you resolved? We do facing the same problem.
Thanks
Ganesh

Tax issue with Direct Input mode of RFBIBL00

Hi, I have a problem using RFBIBL00 (direct input mode) to create A/R invoices. There is no tax associated with the invoice, however, when I use direct input mode, instead of posting immediately, a batch input session is created. In the log, an information message: 'Specify a tax jurisdiction key'. The BDC session is processed with no error.
When using Call transaction mode for RFBIBL00, the document is posted immediately but the requirement is to use Direct input mode.
There is no converted data in the BBTAX structure since the doc. does not need to post to tax account. Do I need to populate the Tax amount, Tax code and jurisdiction code in this structure and BBSEG in order to by pass the information message?
Any advice is appreciated.
- Minami

Problem solved. Just need to untie the relationship between the ITEM import structure and the BBTAX so the Direct Input program will not require a tax jurisdiction code.

Post FB60 with tax calculate

Hi all
when i post in fb60 with tax calculation in that time one error came
that is tax code v2 country IN does not exist in procedures TAXN.
but i check the tax procedures create and assigned but why i did't post the document

Hi Sadhu,
Kindly answer the below questions. (apart from the questions asked above)
1) What tax procedure your using TAXINN or TAXINJ?
2) Did you check whether the tax code is assigned to company code?
Thanks & Regards
Om

Tax Jurisdiction issues in AR Invoice Creation

MODULE = AR
EBS Version = R12.1
EBS Tax is setup
Hi All
I am currently trying to mimic the functionality in the front end of AR Transaction workbench from the back end via Auto Invoice process
From the front end+
When I manually create an invoice and create an invoice line, I get 3 tax lines automatically created. These 3 lines correspond to the State, City and County Tax .
The values I get for Tax fields are =>
Tax Regime Code = US_SALES_USE_TAX,
Tax = CITY, COUNTY or STATE,
TAX Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample)
Rate = (1.0, 4.0, 2.0) (Sample)
and so on
Backend*
Now from the backend, I am trying to convert legacy invoices using AutoInvoice.
So when I pass the values of Tax Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample) for my 3 tax lines, I get an error of undefined Tax Jurisdiction.
Of course when I query the jurisdictions table, ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B, these values are not defined.
So the question is how do these values get populated from the front end but not from the back end.
I want to create tax lines and tax amounts from the legacy data and show the tax amounts as they are brought over from data extract i.e. I do not want EBS tax to calculate tax for me - rather just let me pass amounts in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table
I have read the metalink id 731149.1 and I am basically using that to create manual tax lines. If I pass one of the values that is defined in the ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B table, I am able to create a tax line, but the jurisdiction code defined there are wierd ( sample jurisdiction defined = ST-370000000)
Bottom line is that the ZX_JURISDICTIONS table does not have state, city county names defined in the table but it still shows them when tax lines are automatically created for manual invoices.
When I try to populate those in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table I get an error.
Thanks
Also is it possible to post screenshots in Oracle Forums ?
Edited by: user13293643 on Aug 30, 2010 8:19 AM

From my point of view you have only 1 chance:
- Find a criteria of the imported invoices, which is avaible in the Tax Rules as condition (e.g. specific transaction types or you used a specific tax code by the import)
- Put the tax line manual in the Autoinvoice from the frond end system
- Defined a rule for each tax in the EBS Tax manager: Principell logic: If Tax_Code/transaction type = ABC then tax non-applicable
Which this rule, no standard tax code is selected by EBS Tax, the tax is disable for the transaction and only the imported tax lines are booked.
By my last customer I had the same problem and we have investigate many time.
We have used for the imported invoices special tax codes and these tax code used for the disable of the tax in the tax rules.

POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT with tax holding base amount issue.

Hello Experts,
There is existing custom program which taking input from excel file and by using POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT FM they are posting Vendor Doc.
Now they want to add with tax holding base amount to be add based on Tax Code. Through recording i got fieldname like WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD
(tax code) and WITH_DIALG-WT_BASE (BASE AMOUNT).
I'm using above field names and passing values to table of structure FTPOST, but its not working. is there any other way to make this work
i found one table of structure FTTAX (Taxes for Internal Posting Interface) can it be useful to achieve the goal????
Thanks in Advance to all.

Uhm
As you can see you've two codes for every wt lines, the first code is not editable
Both the codes are the same values:
- First CB, CB
- Second CF, CF
The wt codes you need to transfer to your posting are from master data (I don't know if it's for vendor, LFBW, or customer, KNBW)
I suppose the order to show the wt depends on how they are set in master data
Now, I've never used fm POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT directly, but it's used by BI standard RFBIBL00 and I've used it many many times.
Usually the lines of wt have to have both codes, if it doesn't need to fill a code, this code has to fill with 'blank'
So if It moved the wt for RFBIL00:
- CB lines:
WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CB'
WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = SPACE
WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 0.
- CF lines:
WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CF'
WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = 'CF'
WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 500.
I repeat this is how the wt lines should be preparated for RFBIBL00, but this program calls POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT so I suppose it should be preparated in the same way.
You can also considere to use RFBIBL00 instead of fm
Max

AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction in FB60

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for