Tax Jurisdiction issues in AR Invoice Creation

MODULE = AR
EBS Version = R12.1
EBS Tax is setup
Hi All
I am currently trying to mimic the functionality in the front end of AR Transaction workbench from the back end via Auto Invoice process
From the front end+
When I manually create an invoice and create an invoice line, I get 3 tax lines automatically created. These 3 lines correspond to the State, City and County Tax .
The values I get for Tax fields are =>
Tax Regime Code = US_SALES_USE_TAX,
Tax = CITY, COUNTY or STATE,
TAX Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample)
Rate = (1.0, 4.0, 2.0) (Sample)
and so on
Backend*
Now from the backend, I am trying to convert legacy invoices using AutoInvoice.
So when I pass the values of Tax Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample) for my 3 tax lines, I get an error of undefined Tax Jurisdiction.
Of course when I query the jurisdictions table, ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B, these values are not defined.
So the question is how do these values get populated from the front end but not from the back end.
I want to create tax lines and tax amounts from the legacy data and show the tax amounts as they are brought over from data extract i.e. I do not want EBS tax to calculate tax for me - rather just let me pass amounts in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table
I have read the metalink id 731149.1 and I am basically using that to create manual tax lines. If I pass one of the values that is defined in the ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B table, I am able to create a tax line, but the jurisdiction code defined there are wierd ( sample jurisdiction defined = ST-370000000)
Bottom line is that the ZX_JURISDICTIONS table does not have state, city county names defined in the table but it still shows them when tax lines are automatically created for manual invoices.
When I try to populate those in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table I get an error.
Thanks
Also is it possible to post screenshots in Oracle Forums ?
Edited by: user13293643 on Aug 30, 2010 8:19 AM

From my point of view you have only 1 chance:
- Find a criteria of the imported invoices, which is avaible in the Tax Rules as condition (e.g. specific transaction types or you used a specific tax code by the import)
- Put the tax line manual in the Autoinvoice from the frond end system
- Defined a rule for each tax in the EBS Tax manager: Principell logic: If Tax_Code/transaction type = ABC then tax non-applicable
Which this rule, no standard tax code is selected by EBS Tax, the tax is disable for the transaction and only the imported tax lines are booked.
By my last customer I had the same problem and we have investigate many time.
We have used for the imported invoices special tax codes and these tax code used for the disable of the tax in the tax rules.

Similar Messages

  • Pricing date for the tax condition type should be invoice creation date

    HI Folks,
    As per the current design taxes conditions are determining based on the Service rendered date which is similar to the GI date and pricing type is G in copy control .
    New requirement is taxes should calculate based on the Invoice creation date in the invoice.in order to acheive the solution i have customized the tax related condition type functionality "pricing date" as KOMP-ERDAT but still system calcualting the taxes based on the service rendered date and same also writing in the invoice also.
    pLease help me out what need to be configured here to acheive the solution.
    Regards,
    Ram.

    Hello XYZ,
    As you said the tax is calculated in Taxware system, i think taxware system is configured to calculate the taxes based on the "service rendered date". That is the reason why even you have changed the pricing date to be billing date for condition type XR1 taxware is not behaving as you expected.
      You have two options.
    1. Invocie creation date/ blling date is available in the structure "TAX_CAL_ITEM_IN00".If it is available in the structure ask the Taxware team to make changes in their system to consider that field value instead of the service rendered date.
    2. Alternatively you can over write the filed which contains the service rendered date value with the value of billing date. This way no changes required in Taxware system. You can do that in cusotmer exit  "EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001" include ZXFYTU03 .
       Based on my exeperince i think the consistant approach would be going with option 1 . Please revert if you need furhter information on the same
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: srini vasarao on Jul 14, 2011 12:02 PM

  • Issue in Excise Invoice Creation

    Dear All,
    I am getting the following error message during excise invoice generation.
    "GL account has not been assigned for MSUSP in customization."
    Where to assign the GL and for which combination?
    Rgds,
    Senni.B

    Check the below configuration:
    Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    SAP Ref. IMG SPRO   tax on Goods  Logistics general  Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Account determinationIndia Movements Transaction
    Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    SAP Ref. IMG SPRO   tax on Goods  Logistics general    Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Account determinationIndia Movements Transaction
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

  • Vendor upload using bdc(Tax jurisdiction issue)

    Hi, im trying to upload vendor masters using a bdc. For US vendors i call the function
    DETERMINE_TXJCD_EXTERNALLY to calculate the tax jur code.
    It works fine when there is a single code as an output.
    However some times it gives multiple outputs in the form of a table and i have to select 1 in order for the program to proceed ahead.
           Since this is going to be running in the background it's not possible to select 1 value manually.
           How do i proceed?

    Hi,
    Must Be this TAX juridiction code is is dealing with RFC's. You can not handle this kind of Pop-up's in BDC.( i guess you are getting popup to select juridiction code). Write some logic program( By using the same Function modules which are being used for this caluculation. You can find these FM's in Debugging)  which sends individual RFC  call and populate it to uploading field.
    Regards,
    Krishna.

  • Duplicate Invoice Creation MIRO

    Hi All,
                 Our client has an special requirement. Currently we have an issue with duplicate invoice creation with MIRO transaction. The 'Check doub inv' check box in the vendor master data is already checked. For MM, there are three configurable check boxes i.e. T-Code OMRDC (Co.Cd, Ref. No. and Check Inv. Date.). Per our system configuration, we have the first two boxes checked and the 'Check Inv. Date' unchecked. The Ref. No. field is used to capture the invoice number. This way, if a vendor invoice has already been entered, when trying to enter another vendor invoice with same invoice number, amount, currency, company code and vendor number, irrespective of the date, the system displays a message as "Check if the invoice has already been entered...". As per our requirement, the client basically wants to distinguish between the two invoices purely based on Invoice Number (Reference Number-XBLNR). That is if an invoice has already been entered with a 'Reference Number = 123' for example, the user should not be able to post another invoice with same 'Reference Number = 123', for same vendor, same company code, irrespective of the invoice date and invoice amount. I really appreciate if someone could help me ASAP.
    Thank you,
    Jitesh

    Dear
    Please set the following in MM Logistics Invoice Config so that when MIRO/MIR7 is done twice then qty of MIGO  exceeds then you get an error message.
    T.Code : OMRM
    Material Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Define Attribute of System Messages
    In the above node keep message number 504 Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity and keep online and batch as error and standard as W.
    Hope this solves your problem.
    Regards

  • When we post Inbound Invoice IDocs, we are getting an error message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code".

    Hi Experts,
    When we post Inbound Invoice IDocs, we are getting an error message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code". As checked, we have configured OBCD and OBCA for the vendor and we are passing the Tax Jurisdiction code in E1EDP04 SAL segment. Can anybody give us some idea to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Sameek

    Hi Sameek,
    Please refer the below link. Hope it helps.
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1435286
    Regards,
    Chandan.

  • Tax Jurisdiction code for EDI Incoming invoice

    Hi,
    We have implemented EDI incoming invoice using INVOIC02. The process code is INVL.The invoice is to be posted against a Purchase Order line item. It is noticed that the EDI invoice is not getting the Tax Jurisdiction code from the Purchase Order line . Instead the Tax Juridiction code is copied from the company code. However when we post the invoice manually using MIRO , then the Tax Juridiction code is copied from the Purchase Order. We understand that the system should take the Tax Jurisdiction code from the Purchase Order even for EDI invoices. Is it compulsory that we have to use the user exit EXIT_SAPLMRMH_014 in order to populate the Tax Jurisdiction code field TXJCD from the Purchase Order line? or is there any config required to enable the transfer of Tax Juridication code from the Purchase Order? In transaction OBCE there is a config to transfer the tax jurisdiction code supplied by the external vendor. If we do not check that box , then system is supposed to get the tax jurisdiction code from the Purchase Order.
    Thanks
    Sukumar

    The issue is resolved through OSS Note 506343. In the standard R/3 system, the tax jurisdiction code can't be written to invoice via EDI and only the Ship To Plant's Tax Jurisdiction Code is written to the invoice.
    Regards
    Sukumar

  • AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction in FB60

    Hello Gurus-
    I have a problem/ puzzle I cannot figure out.
    For AP invoices, the Tax Jurisdiction is determined by Ship to and all is good.  However, when AP attempts to add freight to an invoice via t-code FB60, the tax juirisdiction defaults to plant which is wrong.
    Can this be changed to mirror the ship to?  Is there a solution to this?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    In FB60, you can not link to Ship to party as it is FI transaction and not related to SD.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • AP Issue with Tax Jurisdiction

    Hello AP Guru's-
    I have a situation where were are adding line items to an invoice with a PO.  The tax jurisdiction code is correct but when we add a G/L, it is pulling the wrong tax jurisdiction code?  Where is SAP pulling this tax jurisdiction code from?  I assume from Vendor Master but it is wrong?  Shouldn't it match the PO?
    Thanks!

    Upon reviewing the Plant Master data- I found that the PO is pulling the Tax code from by the Plant.  However, when the user attempts to add a line item, it is pulling the PO by the Co.code.  I am still working on this but it doesn't make any sense.  I would expect SAP to be logical in that it would be consistent by PO or by Vendor. 
    What is the standard 'best practices' method here?
    I would suspect that it would be by PO and not by company code via MIRO?
    But I did confirm that the PO is by Plant and not Vendor which is correct.  In addition, I could not find a way to remove the tax code by plant but I may not want to do that anyway. 
    My users don't like that the tax code in MIRO when they add a GL line item does not match the PO.
    Any suggestions?

  • Tax jurisdiction code creates a difference when posting invoice with PO ref

    I have added a tax jurisdiction code since the client wants to be able to sort taxes by location.  The problem now is that, I have posted a PO with a tax jurisdiction code but upon posting the invoice with reference to this PO, there's an error saying that there still exists a balance even though the balance on the screen is zero.  Any ideas on how this can be solved?

    Hi ,
    Can you please tell us how you resolved? We do facing the same problem.
    Thanks
    Ganesh

  • INVOIC idoc error 51due to "Enter a tax jurisdiction code"

    Hi Expeets
    We use INVOIC for automated MIRO for an interco STO.
    Th idoc is unsuccessful due to message "Enter a tax jurisdiction code"
    The tax jurisdiction code is already there in PO item and it is getting determined in MIRO item when we manually create invoice.
    Please guide me to avoid this error with Idoc.
    thanks
    ramSiva

    Hi ramSiva,
    You will need to do a test with the IDoc to see if it is processed correct when you fill the tax jurisdiction code. Then you will now that you need to adjust the code for processing the IDoc.
    If it still goes wrong then there is something else incorrect.
    I am not a functional consultant, but maybe these are customizing settings where the taks code is made mandatory. Check with your functional consultant, maybe he knows the rules for this field in relation to customizing settings.

  • Creation of Budget Billing Plan for Countries with Tax Jurisdiction

    Hello Experts,
    When I create a budget billing plan for a company code with country Canada/USA and jursidiction TAXCAJ/TAXUSJ using transaction EA61, I get the message "Taxes with jurisdiction code not permitted with down payments"(Message no. >0194).  The long text for this message says "Delete your entry in the field for jurisdiction code"  Is any one aware where from this jurisdiction code should be deleted.
    Is it possible to create budget billing plan for countries with jurisdiction code at all ?
    Thanks in advance
    Venkat

    Hello Roopali,
    What I learnt in the process of exploring the functionality is that Payment PLan (BBP or AMB) is the budget billing method for countries with Tax Jurisdiction. Statistical, Partial & Payment Scheme only works when jurisdiction is not defined for tax procedure. Payment scheme is the recommend procedure for Eurpopean market
    Thanks for your clarification
    Best Regards
    Venkat

  • Tax error while posting an invoice in SRM

    We are using SRM 5.5 SP4, ECS and ECC 6.0. We are using vertex for tax caluculation and we configured the tax calculation to always occur in ECC.
    One more important point is, client has decided to use invoicing in SRM. Now the problem is we ran in to so many tax related issues and we opened OSS messages for this but SAP did not help. Let me explain the problem in detail.
    1) We used to get "Tax jurisdiction code could not be determined" error while creating shopping cart, but we implemented note 436760 and hardcoded a value and got rid of that error.
    2) When we create a SC, the copy of PO is created in ECC and vertex is called for tax calculation and tax is calculated properly based on the tax hierarchy except when you use the Shipping Address (external), so when I used the delivery address other than plant, it should calculate based on that address but it was not doing that, its calculating based on the cost object's jurisdiction code. For this problem, we have implemented ME_ADDRESS BADI in ECC, but with this BADI, it is always taking delivery address's jurisdiction code, which is also wrong.
    The tax jurisdiction determination should be from 1) Delivery address if its different from plant, else it should look in to the cost object, else storage location then plant.
    So we implemented the above logic in that BADI and there is no problem with PO taxes.
    3) When we create an invoice with reference to PO, the invoice verification program is always determining the tax jurisdiction code from plant even though the taxes on PO are calculated based on cost object, hence the IDOC is erroring out by saying there is a difference in tax.
    So we implemented the user exit and used the same logic of tax determination and its fixed now.
    4) Finally, we are trying to create invoices without PO's in SRM, here no tax calculation is happending in SRM, but when we try to post the invoice in to ECC, we are getting the following error
    "SAX processing failed on input stream#SAX processing failed when attempting to add child element to parent.  (parent element=com.vertexinc.tps.common.domain.LineItem, child element=com.vertexinc.tps.x.."
    So I am not sure how to fix this, we are at the dead end now out of ideas, so trying to get some help from experts like you about looking at this problem in a different angle. Now there are a couple of questions I can ask you
    1) Did we do something wrong by selecting R/3 as the tax calculation system, if not is it difficult to fix this error and move forward?
    2) What if we need to change the design and start calculating the taxes in SRM by connecting SRM to Vertex, will there be any new challenges? and do you have any config doc for this? Also we are implementing this rollout for US, Canada and Mexico companies.
    I would really appreciate if you can reply me with your valuable input. You can also email me if @ [email protected]
    Thanks a lot,
    Sreedhar

    Hi
    <b>It's recommended to have the same Tax related configuration data replicated in SRM system from R/3 as well.
    I don't recommeded you to go with Hard-coding of tax codes.
    We have faced similar issues with Delivery address and we have to solve it using our custom logic inside the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI  and BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK BADIs.</b>
    Anyways, send the detailed business requirements to my mail which are already having with you.        )
    I will definitely help you out.
    <u>Please refer to following threads as well.</u>
    <b>sales tax gurus
    How to display country related tax codes in SRM
    e-Invoice tax calculation.
    Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
    Drill down facility not working for Tax codes ....Urgent!!!!!
    Tax Issue
    Tax Calculation
    Tax setting in Extended Classic Scenario
    Withholding Tax in SRM5.0
    IDOCS for Tax Information
    Taxes in Bid Invitation
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Tax Jurisdiction Code Check as part of a Sales Order Partner Function

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where we modify partner information directly in the sales order. These partners are simple addresses and are not tax relevant. We have set them up as one-time customers. Every time when we modify the address information, Vertex kicks in and tries to match the address information (street, city and state) with a tax jurisdiction code. In our case the address information is high level (only city and state) which is not enough for Vertex. SAP issues then a blocking error message.
    We try to find a way to ignore Vertex for these specific partners. In the documentation we have found a user exit, as well as a BADI, but our developpers were not able to make it work in the sales oder.
    The user-exit is the following: EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001
    The BADI is the following: IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN
    In EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001, I've found a parameter (EXEMP_IND) which could enable to bypass the tax jurisdiction code check and the RFC call to Vertex.
    In IF_EX_ADDRESS_SUBSCREEN, I've found a parameter (CHECK_ADDRESS) which could potentially bypass the check as well.
    Did any of you already experience this scenario or would you have an idea about how I could make this work?
    Thanks
    Loic

    Unfortunately, the sales order is created through an interface (using iDOCs), and the external system feeding the iDOC for the sales order creation does not have any Zip Code information. Besides, even if the Zip Code is entered, it is still not enough for Vertex to choose automatically a Tax Jurisdiction Code, most of the times, it is also requiring a District, which again, will not be passed from the interface.
    We went through this analysis already and we came to the conclusion that we need to bypass this check, as this partner function is not tax relevant.
    Thanks,
    Loic
    Edited by: Loic Dominik on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 PM

  • Tax is not visible in the LOV while creating Tax Jurisdiction through Payab

    Hi Gurus,
    We are not using E-Biz Tax here, after upgrade, Users were unable to create a VAT Invoice with error as below:
    Could not update the payable information for the modifications done in the tax window ZX_TAX_RATE_INFO_NOT_FOUND N TAX_REGIME MU-Tax n TAX_CODE VAT N TAX_STATUS STANDARD N TAX_RATE_CODE 15% n TAX_JURISDICTION_CODE NULL
    I checked in the system, there are taxes, tax regime, Tax rate, Tax status but not the Tax Jurisdiction. I also tried to create a new Tax, Tax status and Tax rate but when I tried to create the tax jurisdiction, it shows me error as below:
    TAX no data found
    It does not show any tax in Tax Field, but when I go back and query my tax, it is available and enabled for transactions also. Am I missing any step in between? I have followed all the steps.
    Please help, what should I do to enable the tax already created in 11i and migrated to R12 and for new taxes also?
    This is a very urgent issue, a timely help will be highly appreciable.
    Thanks a lot, in advance.
    Regards,
    A.B.

    Hello,
    Please check the correct settings (input/Output Tax)
    IF every thing is correct, then update the table.
    If your problem still there, then it is simply a refreshment problem, so close SAP and re open again
    Hope your problem will be solved
    Thanks
    T.

Maybe you are looking for