Approval date in Depot repair

Hi All,
In the depot repair orders if the approval_flag='N' where can we get the "approval date/rejected_date" and "date sent for approval"
Regards,
Sandeep V

Lets start with the obvious question, is there anything that's saying having workflow created versioning is a bad thing? If you've got document checking and versioning turned on, you're clearly in an environment where auditing it needed.
SPD has steps for checking in and checking out.  If you use these, than you can also use the "log item to history" or something similar to log the history.
Other than that, try using calculated columns to look up both the Approver and the Approver Date.  Return these as single lines of text and they should work fine with Quick Parts.
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

Similar Messages

  • Depot Repair

    Does the addition of the depot repair module in addition to the customer service module improve the ability to get detailed reports on repairs. Also if you have a repair depot and you bring in a product where you have to fix more than one component, how does depot repair track this and how will it report this? Are the reports searchable?

    Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
    Hope this helps

  • Depot Repair interractions question

    At our site, we have two business units running one instance of Oracle. One of the units is going to be turning on the Depot Repair module and our business unit is not.
    We've been asked to participate in the pre-release testing and I'm not sure we're actually needed but I'm seeking some general information to confirm my suspicion.
    Question 1: If we don't use the module in our business unit, is there any way the module could cause changes to either the way other modules we use work or to the underlying data in those modules?
    Question 2: If the data in Oracle is segregated by business unit, is there any way that the module when used by the other business unit could drive changes to data in our unit?
    I'm not an Oracle person; I've been tasked to do a risk assessment/mitigation for our business unit and an trying to figure out how a module we don't intend to use could muck up anything we do use.
    Thank you for any information you can share.
    Doug

    Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
    Hope this helps

  • Depot Repair APIs

    Does anyone know where I can find good resources and examples of using the depot repair APIs?

    Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
    Hope this helps

  • Depot Repair setups and flows..

    Gurus,
    Can some one please help in forwarding the Setups for Depot Repair and any flows like BFN.
    Thanks in Advance........

    Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
    Hope this helps

  • Approval data of SC and PO in SRM 7.0

    Hi experts,
    we use SRM 7.0 with BRF workflow.  I need the approval data of SC and PO for such view in Mail:
    Approvingstep    Status       Approver        GID Approver
    purchaser          approved   John  Alex       z00000001
    approver           approved   Tom Morgan    z00000002
    etc.
    I attempted to use FM BBP_PDH_WFL_APPROVER_GET, but  it was futile.
    Can you please give me an advice for this?
    Regards,
    Evgeny.

    Solved by me

  • To get supplier name based on latest approved date

    hi
    in PO SUPER USER -Purchase Order Summary ,when we enter the item number in Item,rev field a new form Purchase Order Lines opens
    in this form there are many lines of PO numbers ,suppliers(vendors),approved date ,can we get the supplier name for which the approved date is most recent
    kindly guide
    thanking in advance

    hi
    in my system i can see the latest approved date wise but i have to add an inline query on the most recent vendor based on approved date to an already existing query
    meaning just the first row data(most recent supplier) should be captured in the query
    when i do the following query , i am taking an eg of the item_no 1020101001
    select msib.segment1,max(pha.approved_date) from
    po_headers_all pha,
    po_lines_all pla,
    po_vendors pv,
    mtl_system_items_b msib
    where
    pha.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
    and pla.item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
    and pv.vendor_id=pha.vendor_id
    and msib.segment1='1020101001'
    --and pha.approved_date=max(pha.approved_date)
    group by
    --item_id.
    msib.segment1
    this is the output i get
    segment1           MAX(PHA.APPROVED_DATE)
    1020101001    1/9/2011 3:16:48 PMwhen i do the following query
    select msib.segment1,max(pha.approved_date) ,pv.vendor_name from
    po_headers_all pha,
    po_lines_all pla,
    po_vendors pv,
    mtl_system_items_b msib
    where
    pha.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id
    and pla.item_id = msib.inventory_item_id
    and pv.vendor_id=pha.vendor_id
    and msib.segment1='1020101001'
    --and pha.approved_date=max(pha.approved_date)
    group by
    --item_id.
    msib.segment1
    ,pv.vendor_name
    segment1           MAX(PHA.APPROVED_DATE)  VENDOR_NAME
    1020101001    7/21/2008 9:09:20 AM   TRIZAC  ABU DHABI
    1020101001   1/9/2011 3:16:48 PM        SAUDI CEMENT COMPANY
    1020101001   2/14/2010 4:03:46 PM     UNION CEMENT NORCEM CO.
    1020101001  5/19/2010 3:08:32 PM      AS CIMENTO SANAYI VE TICARET A.S.i require the most recent vendor_name for a particular item ( i require the output as below)
    segment1 MAX(PHA.APPROVED_DATE) VENDOR_NAME
    1020101001 1/9/2011 3:16:48 PM SAUDI CEMENT COMPANY
    kindly guide me
    thanking in advance

  • Data recovery / disc repair help

    can anyone recommend the best data recovery and repair program to use with ext hard drives ?
    thanks

    Check out File Salvage
    Regards
    TD

  • PO Approval date

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue with PO Approval date, we have a release strategy in place for all PRs > 5000 k INR, we have developed a costomised report where in we need to have the approval date of the PO ie the PO release date, we tried to consider the PO workflow for approval date, but we have the versions also maintained for the PO, so we are unable to depend upon the workflow changes in the header changes. please advice if we can use anyother method to get the PO approval date.

    hi
    The Release dates of the PO are unfortunately not stored in SAP but as stated above you can check the change documents in the follwowing manner:
    Go to CDPOS table with Objectid = <PO Number> and OBJSCTCLASS = EINKBELEG and FNAME = FRGKE and NEW_VALUE = <Final release code> and get the CHANGENR from CDPOS. Then go CDHDR with the CHANGENR and get the update date..

  • How to fetch APPROVER NAME  and approval date dynamically for an user

    Hi all..
    How to fetch approver name and approval date dynamicall for an user in an email template..
    can any help me to sort out this pbm,i am new to IDM..
    Thanks in advance..

    Access policies get a static value.  You can't populate a field with an adapter.  If you must do this, leave the field blank, and put an adapter on the process form for your field that must be populated using code or logic.
    -Kevin

  • Depot Repair Order Flexibility after SO created

    Hi everyone,
    I have a client who's looking into using the Depot Repair functionality to handle all returns.  What we're finding so far is that everything works well so long as you know what you're going to do with the material before you create the service notification.  We need to be able to receive the material back in before we decide if we're going to repair it, replace it, or just credit the customer.  The Notification type creates and drives the SO processing.  W/in the SO, the item categories seem to be driving the returns subline, the repair subline, and the outboud delivery subline.  I thought perhaps we could change the item cateogories in order to control subsequent processing (ie, before the return is actually processed in VL01n, update the item category on the return to reflect an item category for return for replacement vs return for repair, etc. but the item categories are protected in the SO. 
    Does anybody have a better way of being able to provide the flexibility of determining the type of processing after the Service notification has been created?  If not, does anybody know how to "unprotect" the item category fields so we can update them manually?
    thanks for the assistance,
    Christie
    Edited by: Christie Monacos on Aug 4, 2010 3:53 AM

    Hello Christie
    I am not a CS specialist, but my current  role affords me the opportunity to provide some thoughts. Here the repair process has been automated to 2 distinct stages: a) Receipt and b) Inspection and repair,  to  create multiple documents  and even objects ( Equipment if required) from Service, Sales, Logistics, and Inventory Management perspectives.
    1) For one you can divide the service notifications into 2 types: a) Customer facing, and b) Internal (fault) Notification.
    2) When you receive you can have 3 types of dispositions: a) Review receipt, b) Return for Repair and c) Exchange at Receipt. If all information is available, in case of the last  2 dispositions, the following documents are created:
    a) Equipment if serialized
    b) Customer facing notification
    c) repair order
    d Inbound delivery
    e) Material  document for movement into stock
    f)  service order/s
    g) Internal Fault Service notification
    3) The first one, Review receipt is used when there is not enough information to create a Repair order. At that time the documents created are: a) Customer facing notification, b) Equipment u2013 if serialized, c) Goods receipt material document.  A task is added automatically to the notification for administration action and/or follow up with the customer.Once all info is available, the remaining documents are created using the reference of  Customer facing notification.
    4) Thus the repair order created will have requisite sub-lines, e.g. Return, Exchange, Repair etc.
    So I believe you need to follow the business  process as it happens in SAP.
    Hope this helps. Let me know.
    4)
    4) Once information becomes available, all other documents created.

  • Join issue - Requestor and Approval data

    Trying to show approval task information with requestor/customer information.
    We are unable to show approval task information and requestor information in the same result.  It appears that there is no join between requestor/customer and approval data.  Is there any way for us to create this join.

    Hi Dan,
    This should not be a problem with the Custom Reports Data Model. For instance, one could build a simple informational report displaying Requisition Number, Service Name, Customer Name, Approval Task Name and Approver Name as follows:
    ServiceRequestFact - RequisitionID (fact)
    Service - ServiceName (dimension)
    Customer - Customer Full Name (dimension)
    Authorization Tasks - Task Name (fact)
    Performer - Performer Full Name (dimension)
    As an FYI -- In the event that you do need to build a report containing data on 2 query subjects that do not have an explicit relationship (not the case here), you can do so by building a Master Detail Report in Report Designer.

  • Table which stores approver data.

    hello,
    which table stores the approver data. i mean the part where you have the node id, agent name, state in the transaction bbp_pd?
    thx in advance

    Hi
    In BBP_PD, in the approver tab, you would see workitem details and approver agent. These details are determined dynamically by the system and do not get stored in any tables. You can try for some FM like RH_WI_AGENTS_GET to fetch the agents using workflow task id.
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • Approver & approval date from Requisition & PO Approval workflow tables

    Dear All,
    My req is to create a report that calculates the lead time taken by a Purchase Requisition to be converted into a PO and released. In the output they want the APPROVER NAME, DATE APPROVED against the REQUISITION NUMBER (EBAN-BANFN) and also they want APPROVER NAME, DATE APPROVED against the Purchase Order (so all in all 2 fields of approvers & 2 fields of approval dates). But the thing is they want these APPROVER NAME, DATE APPROVED from the Requisition Approval Workflow tables.
    Please update the table & fields that will have the Approver and date approved from workflow corresponding to the Purchase Requisition Number and Purchase Order. or What is the link between the "Approver, approval date & Purchase Requisition Number" and "Approver, approval date & Purchase Order".
    Thanks in advance. The solution will be rewarded the points.
    Warm Regards,
    Farooq.

    We have HR/Payroll and Purchasing working fine for 6 years with the following schedule settings. 0.1 seems too frequent:
    A. Schedule one concurrent request to process deferred activities:
    1. Item Type :
    2. Min Threshold :
    3. Max Threshold :
    4. Process Deferred : Yes
    5. Process Timeout : No
    6. Process Stuck : No
    (Once every five minutes)
    B. Schedule one concurrent request to process timeout activities:
    1. Item Type :
    2. Min Threshold :
    3. Max Threshold :
    4. Process Deferred : No
    5. Process Timeout : Yes
    6. Process Stuck : No
    (Once every six hours)
    C. Run for stuck activities periodically
    1. Item Type :
    2. Min Threshold :
    3. Max Threshold :
    4. Process Deferred : No
    5. Process Timeout : No
    6. Process Stuck : Yes
    (Once every day)
    D. Run forall three activities periodically
    1. Item Type :
    2. Min Threshold :
    3. Max Threshold :
    4. Process Deferred : Yes
    5. Process Timeout : Yes
    6. Process Stuck : Yes
    (Once every day)
    By the way, we also have Synchronize WF Local Tables run once every 24 hours
    Hope this helps.
    Edited by: DBA115102 on Feb 1, 2011 10:41 AM

  • PO Approval Date in SSP Approval screen

    Hi,
    We are using ECS with SRM4.0.
    All the Purchase Orders in Awaiting Approval status shows the pending Approval Date as today's date. But the PO Approval WorkItem is lying with Approver for the past 10 days.
    Pls advise so that the correct approval information is displayed in the Approval screen of SSP.
    Rgds.

    Lets start with the obvious question, is there anything that's saying having workflow created versioning is a bad thing? If you've got document checking and versioning turned on, you're clearly in an environment where auditing it needed.
    SPD has steps for checking in and checking out.  If you use these, than you can also use the "log item to history" or something similar to log the history.
    Other than that, try using calculated columns to look up both the Approver and the Approver Date.  Return these as single lines of text and they should work fine with Quick Parts.
    Steven Andrews
    SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
    Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
    Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
    My Wiki Articles:
    CodePlex Corner Series
    Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to change the colour of chart in WAD.

    Hi, I have problem with web report. The web report with bar charts used to show with different colours earlier. Now when I execute the web report, the chart displays in single colour (All the rectangular bars in the charts are displayed in single col

  • IDOC_INPUT_BLAORD updates EKKO-ZBD1T,ZBD2T,ZBD3T,ZBD1P,ZBD2P fileds as zero

    Hi all, Please let me know if you encountered the same issue. Thru FM IDOC_INPUT_BLAORD, am posting contracts (IDOC type: BLAORD03). I am only passing terms of payment through E1EDK01-ZTERM. I am assuming that relevant data for the payment term will

  • Finder Not Showing DVD Content

    Hey there folks. i have had a macbook for about 6 months now with very minimal problems, but i have just come across one that is bugging me quite a lot. i have all my h/d backed up on dvd (philips dvd+rw) i inserted the dvd into the superdrive, but f

  • PowerPivot excel chart in SharePoint 2013

    Hi, I would like to know to see the powerpivot chart in SharePoint using Excel Web Access wepart, do we need to install Powerpivot feature in SharePoint. In my Environment, we have excel service application is configured therefore we have one excel f

  • CANNOT IMPORT FCP  .XML FILE INTO PREMIERE PRO CS5

    Hi, Camera used:-Sony Pmw Ex3 Footage       :- XDCAM  sp(1440 * 1080i) PAL Edited in      :-final cut pro 7 Error            :- failed  to import .xml file into premiere pro cs5 I tried  to import the .xml file into premiere CS5 ,it asked for the med