Depot Repair setups and flows..

Gurus,
Can some one please help in forwarding the Setups for Depot Repair and any flows like BFN.
Thanks in Advance........

Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
Hope this helps

Similar Messages

Setup and flow of Excise duty in India Localization

Hi all,
Can any body tell me about the setup and flow of Excise duty in India Localization please. For eg: for Raw materials, Capital goods, Finished goods etc..
Thanks in advance
Balaji

Hi;
What is your EBS version? If you are on R11 level than check below
Please check below:
Oracle India Localization Setup User's Reference Manual [ID 334838.1]
Oracle India Localization Implementation Guide 11i [ID 334668.1]
Regard
Helios

Drop Shipment and Back to back order setups and flow

Does anyone have a document related to Drop shipment and B2B setups and flow?The screenshots would be very helpful. Please let me know.

Drop ship link - http://www.oraappsguide.com/Drop_Ship_Process_R12.html.

Depot Repair interractions question

At our site, we have two business units running one instance of Oracle. One of the units is going to be turning on the Depot Repair module and our business unit is not.
We've been asked to participate in the pre-release testing and I'm not sure we're actually needed but I'm seeking some general information to confirm my suspicion.
Question 1: If we don't use the module in our business unit, is there any way the module could cause changes to either the way other modules we use work or to the underlying data in those modules?
Question 2: If the data in Oracle is segregated by business unit, is there any way that the module when used by the other business unit could drive changes to data in our unit?
I'm not an Oracle person; I've been tasked to do a risk assessment/mitigation for our business unit and an trying to figure out how a module we don't intend to use could muck up anything we do use.
Thank you for any information you can share.
Doug

Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
Hope this helps

Vision demo :: design flow setup and person hierarchies.

Hi Folks
I am on the look out for the
Demo/pre-sales document of Vision Demo database which talks about the setups and default flows of Vision Corporation
This is the demo 11i database
regards
Sunil Choudhary

Hi Folks
I am on the look out for the
Demo/pre-sales document of Vision Demo database which talks about the setups and default flows of Vision Corporation
This is the demo 11i database
regards
Sunil Choudhary

Disk Utility repairs again and again- no change and Firefox on "go slow"

Hey folks,
Two issues:
1. My Firefox (running newest Flash Player, updated last week as per Firefox's request) 6.0.2 has this awful habit of running slow, ie stalling with the beach-ball every ten minutes of use or so, for about a minute or two before continuing as though nothing were wrong. This started after I had a terrible problem with my MacBook Pro 13 inch, 2.66GHz running OSX10.6.8 simply not starting up and me needing to spend hours making it boot up (I couldn't afford to do a complete reinstall- did an archive one instead). I don't know why and it doesn't happen with Chrome, meaning it is the browser itself, right?
2. No matter how often I repair permissions the same list appears again and again, right after each other. Now I HAVE searched before posting and I understand that ought not be anything to worry about but in the past when I did a repair right after the first it had nothing TO repair the second time. Meaning that it would run the repair and end it without listing anything TO fix the second time around. Now it just goes through the whole process again, taking the same length of time. If it were just a repeat of a repair list, surely it would just list it and not run the whole 9 minute long process again, right?
Note: I also have a warning which I know I can safely ignore (as it is on the list of http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1448?viewlocale=en_US): Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired. but I don't know if this is what is causing the repeat of the repair, even if harmless in itself?
I am almost inclined to do a clean install of everything but have a few projects on the go which require me to have this machine up and running "as it is" with all the project files intact and cannot afford the time out this total reinstall would require.
Any hope for getting it to run "happier" and repair and stay repaired? And Firefox? Clean install advised? Or?

Talk about weird. I go to look up a problem and at the top of the Recent Content list is this post that is exactly the problem I am having with the permissions and the 'Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired.'.
I just received my new mini to replace the one that died last week. I did a backup from time machine and was having problems with the Audio MIDI setup. So I tried repair disk permissions to see if that would help. I repaired the permissions and the Audio MIDI setup still would not work correctly. I verified the permissions again and there were still some that needed repairing, but not as many as the time before. So it did repair some of them. I ran repair permissions again and it said all was fixed. I verified again and the same list of files needed repair. I did it a few more times with the same result.
So I erased the disk and did a clean install. I did the software update again and got everything to the latest versions. 10.6.8.
I verified permissions again and got a list of files that needed repairing. I repaired disk permissions and then verified again. A shorter list this time that were the same list of files was there from before I did the clean install including the 'Warning: SUID file' thing.
So I looked to see if I could change the permissions myself and found that most of the files that it could not fix were 'Alias' of files.
So Disk Utilities can't deal with alias?

What is the Adobe Acrobat Updater PDF Repair Setup Computer Freeze Solution?

I'm using CS4 Creative Suite 4 Design Premium.
The Adobe Acrobat Updater keeps urging me to upgrade to Acrobat 9.3.3. When I attempt to do so, I get a Repair Setup screen saying, "Acrobat has detected that there are missing components that require repair. Select the optional components you would like to repair and click Continue. Deselect a component to completely remove it. Click Cancel to cancel the component repair process." The Adobe PDF Printer is shown with a checkbox next to it.
At this point, the check box next to the Adobe PDF Printer, the Cancel button, and the Continue button are all not operable. The whole update process becomes frozen. Even a Force Quit will not remove the updater from the screen. The only way to get rid of it is with a restart.
This keeps happening over and over again and is becoming annoying.
How can this problem be resolved?
Please advise.
Thanks!
MacBook Pro 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Mac OS 10.5.8

Look to see if something similar to:
Adobe PDF or Adobe quality PDF when you go to the print menu and click on PDF.
http://screencast.com/t/MWI0M2Q1M here is expample of what you see in OSX.4.11
5 and 6 should have a choice of adobe pdf or adobe quality PDF.
IF it does delete the AdobePDF Print driver from Printer Utility and use this.
read this:
http://indesignsecrets.com/acrobats-adobe-pdf-printer-replaced-in-snow-leopard.php although it has to do with Snow leopard it does alos mention X.5.8. as well.
Try repairing acrobat installation then running the installer if it gets stuck 've run out of suggestions other than remove Acrobat all together evrything you can find anywhere on the computer (except your PDF and start from scratch. upgrading from 9.0 through each of upgradeds.

Depot Repair Order Flexibility after SO created

Hi everyone,
I have a client who's looking into using the Depot Repair functionality to handle all returns. What we're finding so far is that everything works well so long as you know what you're going to do with the material before you create the service notification. We need to be able to receive the material back in before we decide if we're going to repair it, replace it, or just credit the customer. The Notification type creates and drives the SO processing. W/in the SO, the item categories seem to be driving the returns subline, the repair subline, and the outboud delivery subline. I thought perhaps we could change the item cateogories in order to control subsequent processing (ie, before the return is actually processed in VL01n, update the item category on the return to reflect an item category for return for replacement vs return for repair, etc. but the item categories are protected in the SO.
Does anybody have a better way of being able to provide the flexibility of determining the type of processing after the Service notification has been created? If not, does anybody know how to "unprotect" the item category fields so we can update them manually?
thanks for the assistance,
Christie
Edited by: Christie Monacos on Aug 4, 2010 3:53 AM

Hello Christie
I am not a CS specialist, but my current role affords me the opportunity to provide some thoughts. Here the repair process has been automated to 2 distinct stages: a) Receipt and b) Inspection and repair, to create multiple documents and even objects ( Equipment if required) from Service, Sales, Logistics, and Inventory Management perspectives.
1) For one you can divide the service notifications into 2 types: a) Customer facing, and b) Internal (fault) Notification.
2) When you receive you can have 3 types of dispositions: a) Review receipt, b) Return for Repair and c) Exchange at Receipt. If all information is available, in case of the last 2 dispositions, the following documents are created:
a) Equipment if serialized
b) Customer facing notification
c) repair order
d Inbound delivery
e) Material document for movement into stock
f) service order/s
g) Internal Fault Service notification
3) The first one, Review receipt is used when there is not enough information to create a Repair order. At that time the documents created are: a) Customer facing notification, b) Equipment u2013 if serialized, c) Goods receipt material document. A task is added automatically to the notification for administration action and/or follow up with the customer.Once all info is available, the remaining documents are created using the reference of Customer facing notification.
4) Thus the repair order created will have requisite sub-lines, e.g. Return, Exchange, Repair etc.
So I believe you need to follow the business process as it happens in SAP.
Hope this helps. Let me know.
4)
4) Once information becomes available, all other documents created.

Workflow Setup and possibilities

Dear Gurus,
I have a client who wants to be able to do multi authoriser through a single initiator while all workflows are active. I currently drive this using below scenario;
Mr. A, B, C are authorisers while Mr Y is the initiator of all documents. For instance; all workflows templates for A,Band C should be active and then Y to be abel to select which of the template to trigger as in AIO.
Once all the templates are active all authorisers gets alert of the approval initiated by Mr Y and the client insist that they want all to be active at all time because we currently manage this with Activating on case of need for each template.
Kindly urgently advise or show me the way to achieve their requirement where by Y would be able to select which of the flow should be triggered at any point in time without necessarily calling for us to deactivate A, or C before B's approval template will be triggered.
Best regards,

Hi,
Please refer SAP help file for setup and possibilities:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo900/helpdata/en/13/a291a101f64ad9bf4b27978097a5db/content.htm
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Depot Repair

Does the addition of the depot repair module in addition to the customer service module improve the ability to get detailed reports on repairs. Also if you have a repair depot and you bring in a product where you have to fix more than one component, how does depot repair track this and how will it report this? Are the reports searchable?

Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
Hope this helps

Error in Depot Repair when creating repair order for SR

Hi,
I am getting the following error in Depot repair when creating a repair order for a Service Request :
"The Service Request Customer (GEJ Service Provider) does not own this item instance (&ITEM_INSTANCE). Please choose another instance. (IB_INSTANCE=21777)"
An Item Instance was created for customer A (Owner), then party relationship was created in IB with another customer (GEJ Service Provider).
Now a SR is created with customer as GEJ Service Provider and this item instance is selected.
The error is coming up when trying to create repair order for this SR.
Any idea how to resolve this issue?
Regards,
Mohammed

Mohammed
Please refer to this in Metalink note that says Deport Repair 11.5.10 enhancements and search for this ER number.
ER: 4723163
Service Request and Repair Order blocks of Depot repair do not allow ability to change Installed Base ownership of an item or creation of TCA relationships between existing TCA parties before creating a service request or repair order.
Ability to automatically change ownership for an install base tracked item when returned for repair.
ER 4723163
Patch 4910836
Look like you have applied this patch.
Coming to the issue you cannot achieve what you are trying. The only option is to add this subfunction Depot: Allow Change of IB Ownership to your menu of the resp you are trying to use and the message will be different:
This allows you change the ownership and create a repair order.
Unfortunately customer relationship is not going to help at this time. YOu may want to log an SR and see if that is intended in the future. I checked R12.06 but the same behavior is exhibited there as well.
Good luck!
Thanks
Nagamohan

Depot to plant and vice versa process.

Dear all,
Can anybody share your knowledge about depot to plant and plant to depot and sales process flow with excise entery.
Advance thanks for your great knowledge shareing.
reg
mrs

Hi,
Sales from Depots
Purpose
You may sell finished goods directly from the place of manufacture, as described under Sales from Factories, or you may first ship them to a separate location for storage (a depot), from where you will sell them. The second procedure is described here.
Sales from depots are handled differently from sales from factories because of excise law: Excise duty is payable when you send the goods from the factory to the depot, but it is not levied again when you sell the goods.
Sometimes when you make a final sale of goods from a depot, price escalations could have happened with retrospective effect. In such scenarios you need to pay the extra excise duty at the factory using an A Certificate. You need to register the A certificate details in the RG 23D register and the excise recovered from the customer.
Prerequisites
You have customized:
Stock transport processing, in Customizing for Materials Management (MM), by choosing Purchasing ® Purchase Order ® Set Up Stock Transport Order
The copying control for copying stock transport order NL to excise invoice JEX
Make this setting in Customizing for Logistics u2013 General, by choosing Taxes on Goods Movements ® India ® Business Transactions ® Outgoing Excise Invoices ® Assign Billing Types to Delivery Types.
The item category NLN (standard transport order) so that it is relevant for billing
You do this in Customizing for Sales and Distribution (SD), by choosing Sales ® Sales Documents ® Sales Document Item.
Process Flow
- You create the sales order, following the standard procedure.
The standard pricing procedures for depot sales are J1INDEP (condition-based excise determination) and JDEPOT (formula-based excise determination).
- You create the delivery, again, following the standard procedure.
- You assign excise invoices to the delivery or material document.
- You verify that you have selected the correct excise invoices and post them. Alternatively, if you have selected the wrong excise invoices, you can cancel the assignment.
- You create the invoice, following the standard procedure.
For more details click on following link;
Sales from Depots

Depot Repair Implementation in 11.5.10

Hi All,
Need advise regarding the Depot Repair Implementation. We are currently implementing Depot Repair module in 11.5.8 (Upgraded from 10.7) but observed that there are lot of bugs.
Did anybody successfully implemented Depot Repair in 11.5.8?
We wanted to evaulate upgrading from 11.5.8 to 11.5.10 if Depot Repair module is stabilzed in 11.5.10. Could anyone advise if Depot Repair functionality is working good in 11.5.10?
We are currently on 11.5.8 with GL, AP, AR, PO, INV, OM, BOM, WIP, MRP modules.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards,

I am implementing Depot Repair 11.5.10 and so far so good. It is very tightly integrated with OM, INV, CRM Foundation, FS Debrief, Install Base and Service. Not actually using any Service Contracts functionality or KB but we are going live in 6 weeks and not really had too many serious issues.
Hi All,
Need advise regarding the Depot Repair
Implementation. We are currently implementing Depot
Repair module in 11.5.8 (Upgraded from 10.7) but
observed that there are lot of bugs.
Did anybody successfully implemented Depot Repair in
11.5.8?
We wanted to evaulate upgrading from 11.5.8 to
11.5.10 if Depot Repair module is stabilzed in
11.5.10. Could anyone advise if Depot Repair
functionality is working good in 11.5.10?
We are currently on 11.5.8 with GL, AP, AR, PO, INV,
OM, BOM, WIP, MRP modules.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Regards,

Depot Repair APIs

Does anyone know where I can find good resources and examples of using the depot repair APIs?

Failed and replaced component data is captured in a note field along with mode of failure and failure symptom information. This prevents one from validating the data to ensure consistency and integrity. Consequently, it is unlikely one could perform operations required for analysis of this data. For instance: Assume we are repairing an item and the problem is Low Signal Output. Utilizing a dropdown (or pop-up, your preference) box, one can limit the data entered into a field allowing only the approved values. In this case the repair technician would select Low Signal Output. One could then use this information to determine the most frequently observed mode of failure for a given product or range of products. Conversely, allowing entry of this data into a "free-text" field frequently causes a loss of integrity when, for instance, individuals choose to abbrievate. The problem listed above may be entered as Low Out, Low Signal, Low Output, or even Output low. This eliminates the ability to aggregate this data by mode of failure. One could dump the data to Excel. That seems to defeat the purpose of automating the repair process and collecting data using a sophisticated system such as Oracle.
Hope this helps

Depot Repair Actual (API)

Hi,
I am going to create Depot Repair Actual Lines using CSD_REPAIR_ACTUAL_LINES_PVT.CREATE_REPAIR_ACTUAL_LINES API, For that i need a document to find the mandatory and optional parameters, If any one have the document please put is over here.

Hi,
Please see eTRM and IREP websites.
eTRM
http://etrm.oracle.com
Oracle Integration Repository
http://irep.oracle.com/index.html
Thanks,
Hussein

Depot Repair setups and flows..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for