Approval stages for new component approval during finsihed inspection stage

I am having a typical scenario which is having integration with QM, PP and SD.
Whenever we produce a new component for first time, the first piece is taken for thorough inspection in presence of different departments. This is done with respect to a check list. After this all open points in check list needs to be closed. Then the next 9 pieces are monitored. If all open issues are resolved, then only approval for Bulk production of component will be given. How can I control this production activity in SAP
Example:
Stage 1:
First piece- thorough inspection, identification of defects, action plan to close the issues.
Stage 2:
Next 9 pieces- Further monitoring with respect to action plan.
Stage 3:
If all issues are closed, the approval for bulk production.
Stage 4
Bulk production starts.--- how can i control this activity.
Questions.
Stage 1 uses a check list and format to close open issues, should I use notification or audit management
Stage 2- Manual activity
Stage 3- Action plan closure, were to capture info notification or audit management
stage 4- How to communicate to production to start bulk production? How can I block poduction till closure of action plan?
Thanks
VV

Dear Vineeth
Please find my inputs for this. Requires some development
1) Initialy for the new material  make possible that only  one production order  can be created. Next production order can only be created if the earlier one is TECOed.
For this you will have to have a Z table and user exit PPCO0007 or any exit while releasing the order- . Z table will consist of Plant , material & Quantity. The new material will have to be maintained in this table.
When the production order is released it will first check for this table . if the material code is there in the table it will check for the quantity allowed for the production order and will not allow to create any multiple production order , or more quantity
The operation should have a testing workcenter , so that the control will lie with QM team .
If the first piece analysis is completed , teco the Production order. Update the z table with 9 quantity. create next PO
2) Notification will be the best process to capture all your action plan and activities.Activate workflow for this.
Completion of the notification means approval for bulk and you can remove the material from the Z table
Hope this gives some help
Regards
Gajesh

Similar Messages

  • Prompt for New Folder Name During Running Workflow?

    I've looked everywhere and cant find an answer for this. I'm trying to create an workflow that will copy the pictures I have selected and put them in a new folder inside a folder I've already created. I want the the workflow to prompt me to give a name for the new folder I'm creating. Can it do this?
    Thanks

    Hi Joshua!
    Thanks for your reply. I´m glad, that it works as expected.
    So I will try my best -- as a non nativ english speaker-- to give you a short explanation of what is doing Automator.
    First of all, read the Automator Help. It is good!
    Then, when you create a Workflow, have a look at the Results of every Action (from the Result Button)
    Also there is an inspector, that will allow you to follow the Workflow.
    Most of the Actions based on AppleScript ans Shell Scripts, they work like this:
    Take an Input (if there is one) and return the Output
    In your case:
    Make a new Folder in Folder x
    Result (Output) = Path to Folder
    Show this action when the workflow runs = so you can set the new folder on the run
    Set the Value of a Variable
    The Input is the path to the new Folder, that will be needed later.
    We don´t want to have an Output for the next Action.
    (That would be still the path to the new Folder)
    Get the selected Finder Items
    In the Result they will be listed.
    Copy this items to the new Folder
    We need the path to the new folder, that was created before. So we use the Variable with the stored path
    Spazek

  • New Adhoc approval workflow for approval of supplier for new pdt.category

    Hi,
       I am in the process creating a custom adhoc workflow. this is required for the approval of a supplier for new pdt. category. This shld be n-step workflow.
      After  completing the adhoc approval, it will go to a specific user for final approval. It shld have the functionality of adding approvers & reviewers to the approval process.
       We are in the process of creating Screen & ITS template for the initial screen.How do I proceed with creation of the workflow?
    Regards,
    Sivagami.R

    You'll have to raise request for Dummy Organization. It's Order for Organization so will not appear for user.
    I am not sure the full flow/complete requirement of your.
    APMU, you want approval while creating Organization into OIM.
    This is not possible OOTb when you create ORg in OIM.
    You'll create 1 dummy Org
    1 Dummy RO "OFO".
    Attach one Object Form with this RO.
    Raise request for Dummy Org and Give the name of Org on the object form for which you want approval.
    In the provisioning workflow, use OIM API to create Org into OIM.
    Done !!!

  • Disable next approver notification for a stage

    Hi guys,
    We would like to disable the next approver notification for a particular stage. Is it possible? We have deleted all text from the subject field and body, but the approvers are recieving blank emails.
    Kind regards,
    Vit V

    Hi Vit,
      As far as I know, this is not possible. The approver notification emails are sent out from the Java code so we can not control them.
    Regards,
    Alpesh

  • Approval procedure for the creation of a new item

    I would like to have an approval procedure for the creation of new items. In that when one gets added, it gets placed on hold immediately and an alert gets sent to a manager.
    thx, Richard

    The solution would be the combination of SBO_SP_TransactionNotification stored procedure allowing only for some authorized persons to add an item with not ‘On Hold’ status, and an alert to the authorized persons.

  • How to retrieve comments from one OfficeTask activity and use them in another OfficeTask activity for Multi level Approval sequential Workflow

    I'm designing a sequential site workflow using Visual Studio 2010 for Project Server 2010. In my case, I have following 6 stages in the workflow:
    1. InitialProposal Stage
    2. Approval Stage1 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members1
    3. Rejection Stage
    4. Approval Stage2 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members 2
    5. Execution Stage
    6. Completed Stage
    Requirement is workflow should move to Approval stage2 from Approval stage1  if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group1and it should move to Rejection Stage even if a single member rejects it.
    Workflow should move from Approval Stage2 to Execution Stage if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group2 and it should move back to Approval Stage1 on rejection by a single member of the group.
    I'm using inbuilt PSWApproval content type and OfficeTask activity for creating approval task for the group members at both stages.
    On task rejected in Approval stage2, task will be assigned again to Approval Stage1 and I want to show comments given by members of Approver Project Security Group2 to the members of Approver Project Security Group1 with this assigned task
    but I'm not able to retrieve comments from officeTask activity.
    My question is where exactly these comments are saved? how can we retrieve them and use them in another officetask activity? If this is not possible then what is the possible solution for meeting above mentioned business requirement?

    Hi Paul,
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    By comments field I'm assuming OfficeTask.Comments field. Problem is, this field is always null. I tried accessing this field in CheckExitCondition activity as well as in OnTaskCompleted but in both the cases, it was null only(I wrote comments while approving
    the task).
    I used a code activity within OnTaskCompleted activity and following code for accessing Comments and Description fields:
    public string officeComments;
            public string officeDescription;
            private void TaskCOmplete(object sender, EventArgs e)
                CodeActivity Sender = (CodeActivity)sender;
                Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask ofctask1 = ((CompositeActivity)Sender.Parent).Parent as Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask;
                officeComments = ofctask1.Comments;
                officeDescription = ofctask1.Description;          
    Please tell me if I'm doing anything wrong here, I'm very new to Workflows. Also, do I need to set any specific property of officeTask for retriving comments?
    Thank you

  • Approver question for CUP

    Hi GRC guru's
    As we are in the process of customizing CUP ,I have couple of questions so kindly help me out here
    1. When requestor select roles which belong different approvers how does the request gets processed
      example roles selected are Z_XYZ  who's  role approver is Tom and second role Z_ABC with role approver  John , how is this request handled ?
    2. When you run risk anlysisin CUP  and you find out that there are risks  and there is no mitiagtion control in RAR for risk produced , how will the approver proceed ? should he go back and perform the mitigation in RAR and  then mitiagte the risk in CUP or is there a way to mitigate the new risk in CUP which can then be automaticallly pushed to RAR ?
    3. Is there way to populate user group in the access request form  and is there way to populate the license type in CUP?
    Kindly clear my doubts ,Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Keith.

    Hi Alpesh and all
    I would like to follow up with your answer to Keith's question below.
    1. When requestor select roles which belong different approvers how does the request gets processed
    example roles selected are Z_XYZ who's role approver is Tom and second role Z_ABC with role approver John , how is this request handled ? Both the role owner would get email and can approve the request at same time. Unless untill both these approvers approve/reject the request, request can not move to next stage.
    My question,
    Is there a way to allow users to submit one request with 2 roles with different approvers, if the 1st approver approved the role,  the 1st role to be provisioned to immediately without having to wait for the 2nd approver to approve the 2nd role?
    The two roles both satisfy the critiria of the same initiator (attribute Role, and both roles are in the role list).  Since the roles fall under the same path and stage (only 1 role owern approval stage), I noticed the 1st approved role was not provisioned until the 2nd role is approved.     Is there a way to work arond that?   It make sense to go ahead provision the 1st role without having to waiting for the 2nd role to be approved or rejected.   The roles have the same approval requirement so they should use the same initiator and workflow path.    
    If you or anybody knows the work around, I would appreciate your sharing the info.
    Thanks.
    p.s.
    I did a test to submit a request with 2 roles, each role satisfy a different workflow initiator therefore different paths are used.   1st role was approved through 1st path and provisioned immediately  while 2nd role was waiting in approval stage in the 2nd path.   The request is closed once both path were completed.

  • Approval Authorization for Sales Order

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody help me by providing a user query for Approval templete for the following condition.
    The system should prevent the sales order & Delivery when the customer is having one oustanding invoice above 90 days and the balance due for that invoice is less than Rs. 100
    Regards,
    Srinivas

    Hi Gordon,
    Thanks for your effort. I am getting the approval window after the sales order . ie at delivary it is asking me for approval and also for every delivary it is asking even the customer doesn't have any outstanding. if the approval process activates during SO genaration time ..then this will be helpful.
    If any previous invoice having outstanding balance >100 and if it exceeds 90 days then it should ask for approval. But the system should not check the Customer account balance.
    Regards
    Srinivas

  • How to approve creation of new identities

    Hi,
    I have created an approval process for the creation of new identities based on the how-to-guide for role approvals.
    My idea is to determine all approvers in a script which gets the entry reference as parameter from ToIdentityStore pass.
    However, for some reason, the entry reference is empty.
    Any ideas what am I doing wrong?
    Here is the script:
    function nsn_getNSNApproversFromCompanyAddress(Par){
    var entryReference = Par;
    uErrMsg(1, "entry reference: " + entryReference);
    var idStore = uGetIDStore();
    var companyAddress = uIS_GetValue(entryReference, idStore, "MXREF_MX_COMPANY_ADDRESS");
    uErrMsg(1, "company address: " + companyAddress);
    var nsnApprovers = uIS_nGetValues(companyAddress, "MX_APPROVERS");
    if (nsnApprovers.indexOf("!ERROR")>= 0)
         uErrMsg(1, "ERROR: " + nsnApprovers);
    return nsnApprovers;
    uErrMsg(1, "entry reference: " + entryReference) does not print out any value for entry reference
    And here is the destination tab content of the ToIdentityStorePass:
    MSKEYVALUE     %MSKEYVALUE%
    MX_APPROVERS     $FUNCTION.nsn_getNSNApproversFromCompanyAddress(%MX_ENTRY_REFERENCE%)$$
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Elmar

    Hm, from what the error output message tells me it looks like MX_ENTRY_REFERENCE does not contain ANY value.
    uErrMsg(1, "entry reference: " + entryReference); generates this output: 'entry reference: '
    May this be due to the fact that this is a creation process and the identity to be created is not yet stored anywhere? If so, what would be the correct way to implement an approval process for identity creation?
    In the destination tab, MX_PENDING_VALUE is defined, as in the how-to-guide manager approval example.
    Thanks & Br,
    Elmar

  • Error while assigning user for release approval path for payment release

    Hi everyone,
         I am trying to assign user for payment release in SPRO. I have defined upto 'Define relevant document types for release for payment', after that while assigning user in terms of position for release and save it, i am getting error 'Program error: ASSIGN with length 0 in program "MP120800" '.Because of it i can t proceed further.
    The data in details below;
    1. Create Workflow Variant for Release for Payment
       1000     SAP
    2. Assign Company Code Workflow Variant for Release for Payment
      1000     1000     SAP
    3. Define Release Approval Groups for Release for Payment
      0001     Vendor A
    0002     vendor B
    0003     Vendor C
    0004     G/L accounts
    4. Define Release Approval Paths for Release for Payment
      0001     Vendor high
    0002     Vendor middle
    0003     Vendor low
    0004     G/L accounts
    0005     Other
    5. Assign Release Approval Paths for Release for Payment
      1000     KZ     0001     0001
    1000     KZ     0002     0002
    1000     KZ     0003     0003
    6. Assign Release Approval Procedure for Release for Payment
    1000     0001     20,000.00     KES     1     WS10000052     WS00400011
    1000     0002     50,000.00     KES     2     WS10000052     WS00400021
    1000     0003     1,000,000.00     KES     3     WS10000052     WS00400022
    7. Define Relevant Document Types for Release for Payment
         1000     KR
    1000     KZ
    8. Define Users with Authorization to Payment Release
    1000     0001     1     20,000.00     KES
    1000     0001     2     50,000.00     KES
    1000     0001     3     100,000.00     KES
    here i have selected the option and tried to create Orgobject, i am getting following error
    Program error: ASSIGN with length 0 in program "MP120800"
    If any corrections in the definitions, Please let me know.
    Thanks in advance!!

    Hello,
    Please start the report RSWOGIND, set also the checkbox "generate all
    ObjTypes from new". This should solve the problem.
    Best regards, Hana

  • "This form cannot be opened in a web browser. to open this form use microsoft infopath" while adding a new Approval - Sharepoint 2010 and Publishing Approval workflow.

    I am trying to add a new workflow to a document library with the below mentioned settings and getting error saying "This form cannot be opened in a web browser. to open this form use microsoft infopath" while adding a new Approval - Sharepoint
    2010 and  Publishing Approval workflow" . For your information the I have checked the server default option to open in browser.
    Versioning Settings.
    Error
    This is quiet urgent issue . Any help would be really helpful.. Thanks.. 

    Hi Marlene,
    Thank you very much for your suggestions.
    But I am not creating a custom workflow in designer as Laura has mentioned. I am instead trying to create a new Out of the box Approval Workflow and I get the error mentioned above.
    As it works in other environment, I tried figuring out the possible differences which can lead to this error.
    Today I found one difference which is there are no form Templates within Infopath Configurations in Central Admin. Now I am trying to figure out what makes this form templates to be added to the template gallery.
    Regards,
    Vineeth

  • OIM: Error while deploying Custom Approval Process for Self-Register

    While deploying the Custom Approval Process for Self-Register, i am getting the following error in scac.log file
    Nov 16, 2011 2:48:58 PM oracle.fabric.common.wsdl.SchemaManager isIncrementalBuildSupported
    INFO: XMLSchema incremental build enabled.
    Nov 16, 2011 2:48:58 PM com.collaxa.cube.CubeLogger info
    INFO: validating "ApprovalProcess.bpel" ...
    oracle.jrf.UnknownPlatformException: JRF is unable to determine the current application server platform.
         at oracle.jrf.ServerPlatformSupportFactory.getInstance(ServerPlatformSupportFactory.java:79)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.WLSPlatformConfigurationProvider.<clinit>(WLSPlatformConfigurationProvider.java:44)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.FabricConfigManager.<clinit>(FabricConfigManager.java:155)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.loadXpathFunctions(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:271)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.loadXPathConfigFile(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:153)
         at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.xpath.FabricXPathFunctionResolver.init(FabricXPathFunctionResolver.java:51)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.loadFabricXpathFunctions(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:57)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.<init>(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:48)
         at com.collaxa.cube.xml.xpath.BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.<clinit>(BPELXPathFunctionNameResolver.java:44)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.XPathExprValidatorVisitor.<init>(XPathExprValidatorVisitor.java:122)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.AssignValidator.<init>(AssignValidator.java:89)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.BpelParser.<init>(BpelParser.java:452)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.bpel.BPELValidator.validate(BPELValidator.java:60)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.BPEL1Processor.validate(BPEL1Processor.java:329)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.BPEL1Processor.process(BPEL1Processor.java:153)
         at com.collaxa.cube.lang.compiler.CubeParserHelper.compile(CubeParserHelper.java:47)
         at oracle.fabric.bpel.bpelc.BPELComponentValidator.validate(BPELComponentValidator.java:40)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.validateComponentTypeServicesReferences(ValidateComposite.java:1117)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.doValidation(ValidateComposite.java:500)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.run(ValidateComposite.java:150)
         at oracle.soa.scac.ValidateComposite.main(ValidateComposite.java:135)
    Nov 16, 2011 2:49:00 PM CubeProcessGenerator compile
    WARNING: classpath is: D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\jdev\extensions\oracle.sca.modeler.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.mgmt_11.1.1\soa-infra-mgmt.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.fabriccommon_11.1.1\fabric-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.mediator_11.1.1\mediator_client.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.mds_11.1.1\mdsrt.jar;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.jps_11.1.1\jps-manifest.jar;;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\gen-classes;D:\OIMPS1\Middleware\Oracle_IDM1\server\workflows\new-workflow\process-template\SelfRegistrationApprovalApp\SelfRegistrationApproval\SCA-INF\lib\oimclient.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\commonj.sdo_2.1.0.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.fabriccommon_11.1.1\fabric-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\oracle_common\modules\oracle.xdk_11.1.0\xmlparserv2.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpel1-1-xbeans.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-common.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpel_coherence_config.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-exts.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\bpm-analytics.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\wsif-binding.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\orabpel-validator.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\monitor-rt-xbean.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.bpel_11.1.1\oracle.soa.bpmn.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\user-patch.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.thirdparty.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\uddi\lib\oracle.soa.uddi.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\bpm-infra.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\testfwk-xbeans.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-ext.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-infra-scheduler.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\xmlunit-1.1.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-infra-tools.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\soa-xpath-exts.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\oracle-soa-client-api.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.wls.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-client.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime-ext-was.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\fabric-runtime-ext-wls.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1\oracle.soa.fabric.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.workflow_11.1.1\bpm-services.jar;D:\JDev11g\Middleware\jdeveloper\soa\modules\oracle.soa.ext_11.1.1\classes
    In scac_out.xml file following is the error message
    <Fault>
    <severity>error</severity>
    <loc>/ns:composite</loc>
    <line/>
    <col/>
    <file/>
    <msg>
    <![CDATA[SCAC-50012]]>
    </msg>
    </Fault>

    Hi,
    I have run into the same problem with SOA 11.1.1.5 version. In my case after fixing the following two errors it seems to work fine.
    If you have followed the guide, there must be some errors:
    First the java code if copied then contains an extra enter value:
    Instead of:
    "try {
    System.out.println("Prototype for invoking an OIM API from a SOA Composite");
    System.out.println("RTM Usecase: Self Registration Approval by Organization
    Administrator");"
    Use the following:
    "try {
    System.out.println("Prototype for invoking an OIM API from a SOA Composite");
    System.out.println("RTM Usecase: Self Registration Approval by Organization Administrator");"
    The other error is that you should not use <BEAHOME>/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-manifest.jar, but the <BEAHOME>/oracle_common/modules/oracle.jps_11.1.1/jps-api.jar in jdeveloper. After these the deployment to the application server works fine for me.

  • How to implement Approval hierarchy for Sales Order in Order Management.

    Hi,
    We need approval process for sale orders in Order Management module. Currently we are using credit HOLD option for orders at shipping level. The issue we are facing now is we can not cancel those orders who contains Service Line item in it while on HOLD. The restriction raised at the time of cancelling the order that the Line Item is "fulfilled". Service line item's get fulfilled.
    Is that any other possibility to have Approval hierarchy for Sales Orders in Order Management Module? If it is possible can anybody share the related document or implementation guide?
    Thanks with anticipation in advance.
    Many Regards
    Kaleem Bhatti

    I copied the standard order header workflow and the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to custom workflows.  I then modified the "Book Order, Manual" workflow to put another completely custom workflow (call this "Approvals") in between the "Book Eligible" and "Book" steps.
    The "Approvals" step assessed the sales order, changed the order header to the pending approval flow_status_code, and sent out the appropriate notifications.  The "Approvals" step returned a Complete/Incomplete where complete would proceed to "Book" and incomplete would go back to "Book Eligible."  The new workflow was then assigned to the order type needed.  I don't still have access to that environment (job change) or I would give more definite instructions.

  • Approval workflow for creation of organization

    Hi,
    I need to configure an approval workflow for the creation of organization. When the admin tries to create a new org, the approval should go to a admin group. The org should get created only once approval is done. I have configured an approval workflow for the Xellerate Organization resource object. I have created an unconditional task where the assignment tab has the admin group. When I test it, the org gets created without going through the approval process. Could someone please tell me what am I missing?
    Thanks,
    Supreetha
    Edited by: Supreetha on Jan 22, 2011 8:38 AM

    You'll have to raise request for Dummy Organization. It's Order for Organization so will not appear for user.
    I am not sure the full flow/complete requirement of your.
    APMU, you want approval while creating Organization into OIM.
    This is not possible OOTb when you create ORg in OIM.
    You'll create 1 dummy Org
    1 Dummy RO "OFO".
    Attach one Object Form with this RO.
    Raise request for Dummy Org and Give the name of Org on the object form for which you want approval.
    In the provisioning workflow, use OIM API to create Org into OIM.
    Done !!!

  • We have migrated data from virsa 4.0 to grc 10.1, all virsa mitigation approvers and controllers got migrated but we are not able to map new mitigation approver and controller to the mitigation ids.

    Hello All,
    We have migrated data from virsa 4.0 to grc 10.1, all virsa mitigation
    approvers and controllers got migrated but we are not able to map new
    mitigation approver and controller to the mitigation ids.
    The steps we have done below.
    1. We have created user id in su01 with necessary authorizations
    2. we have declared this user id in Access control owners as a
        mitigation approver and assigned to the organization unit
    Now we are trying to map to newly created mitigation approver to the
    mitigation id but we are not able to find that approver id for the mitigation ids. (only old mitigation ids came from VIRSA only we are able to see, not able to add new mitigation approvers / controllers to the mitigation ids)
    Kindly check this issue, this is very critical for us.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Karunakar

    Hi Karunakar,
    - Assign Owners to Organization unit
    - Make these owners as Mitigation Approver and Monitor
    - Create Mitigation Id in this Org. unit
    Regards
    plaban

Maybe you are looking for