AS2 decryption error on file sizes greater than 5MB.

We have a client who is not using biztalk but transmitting files to us via AS2. The AS2 file transmission occurs seamlessly when the file size is below 5MB, but Biztalk AS2 decoder fails to decrypt when file size exceeds 5MB. After searching the forums,
I learned that this is a known issue and there is a hot fix available to fix that issue. I wanted to replicate the same issue in my test environment so that i can apply the hot fix in that environment and make sure nothing breaks. I replicated the AS2
setup in 2 biztalk test machines . I used one machine as partner A and the other as partner B, then transmitted AS2 files from partner A to partner B. I sent files with sizes 2MB, 5MB, 15MB, and 50MB, but partner B received all the decrypted files successfully.
Production servers and test servers have biztalk 2010 installed.
In conclusion, the decryption issue is occurring in production machine only, and I am unable to replicate that issue in our test servers. I am scared to apply the hot fix or CU5 directly in production. Please advise if there is something else i am missing.
Thank you.
Error message:
Error details: An output message of the component "Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.PipelineComponents" in receive pipeline "Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.DefaultPipelines.AS2Receive, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiIntPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" is suspended due to the following error:
An error occurred when decrypting an AS2 message..
The sequence number of the suspended message is 2
Hot fixes to fix the issue:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2480994/en-us
For some people CU5 fixed the issue.
Dilip Bandi

First, make sure CU5 wasn't unintentionally applied by Windows Update to your test config.
Second, either way, a valid strategy would be to apply CU5 as a normal patch, meaning DEV->TEST->UAT->PROD (or whatever your promotion path is). That way, you'll test for any breaking changes anyway and if the AS/2 issues isn't fixed, well,
you really no worse off.

Similar Messages

Java.exe sizes greater than 350M , web report often error

HI , friends
My ie is 8,and webi4.0.
the web report file(universe) has 63 reports,hundreds formulas，
open the report java.exe sizes greater than 350M.
every time edit report ，only edit fews formulas....then the edit does not work.
and edit Data Access,or refresh ,then error: An error has occured.....(Screenshot)
only to log off ,and shut down IE ...
After a while open the IE, Sign in web report... ...again...
I set the RAM as a virtual hard disk,and set up IE explorer buffer memory to the NEW hard disk,
but error still exists.
please help me , thanks.

Hi,
On Windows 7, you may set the Java maximum Java heap size to 1536 MB in Java Control Panel -> Java -> Java Runtime Environment Settings, Runtime paramaters for both User and System.
-Xmx1536m -Xincgc
Note that
depending on the desktop OS, the maximum Java heap size could vary, you'd need to test it and find out the ceiling to that OS.
-Xincgc is to enable incremental garbage collection instead of waiting for whole lot chunk of garbage to be collected.
Hope this helps,
Jin-Chong

SAP ISR -XI - SAP POS. File size more than 11 KB failing in Inbound

Hi All,
We are implementing SAP ISR- XI - POS Retail implementation using
Standard Content Store Connectivity 2.0, GM Store Connectivity 1.0, and
other contents.
In our Inbound Scenario File-RFC , we are picking files from FTP server
for sales and totals data and if the size of this sales data file in
format *_XI_INPUT.DAT is greater than 11 kb , it is failing at XI
Mapping level, saying Exception occurred during XSLT
mapping "GMTLog2IXRetailPOSLog" of the application. We have tried and tested at mapping level no error found as this is processing files below 11 Kb successfully with same mappings, Also this is standard Mapping by SAP in form of XI Content Store connectivity 2.0.
At XI Side we have processed the file of eg: 40 KB by splitting the record data and making
file size less than 11KB and it is being processed successfully, but file of 40 kb fails.
XI Server: AIX Server.
There may be some memory setting missing or some basis problem also. Kindly let me know how to proceed.
Regards,
Surbhi Bhagat

hi,
this is hard to believe that such small files cannot be processed
do your XI mappings work for any other flows with something more then 11kb?
let me know about that and then we will know some more
as this is realy very small size
maybe your XI was installed in on PocketPC
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Parse an XML of size greater than 64k using DOM

Hi,
I had a question regarding limitation of parsing a file of size greater than 64k in Oracle 10g. Is the error "ORA-31167: XML nodes over 64K in size cannot be inserted" related to this ?
One of the developers was telling that if we load an XML document of size greater than 64k into Oracle DOM, it will fail. Is 64k the size of the file or the size of text node in the XML?
Is there a way we can overcome this limitation?
I believe that Oracle 11g R1 documentation states that existing 64k limitation on the size of a text node has been eliminated. So if we use Oracle 11g, does it mean we can load XML files of size greater than 64K (or XML having text nodes of size greater than 64k)
I am not well versed with XML. Please help me out.
Thanks for your help.

Search this forum for the ORA-error.
Among others it will show the following: Node size
In this case I think we can assured that "a future release" in 2006 was 11.1 as mentioned by Mark (= Sr Product Manager Oracle XML DB)

Load and Read XML file size more than 4GB

Hi All
My environment is Oracle 10.2.0.4 on Solaris and I have processes to work with XML file as below detail by PL/SQL
1. I read XML file over HTTP port into XMLTYPE column in table.
2. I read value no.1 from table and extract to insert into another table
On test db, everything is work but I got below error when I use production XML file
     ORA-31186: Document contains too many nodes
Current XML size about 100MB but the procedure must support XML file size more than 4GB in the future.
Belows are some part of my code for your info.
1. Read XML by line into variable and insert into table
LOOP
UTL_HTTP.read_text(http_resp, v_resptext, 32767);
DBMS_LOB.writeappend (v_clob, LENGTH(v_resptext), v_resptext);
    END LOOP;
    INSERT INTO XMLTAB VALUES (XMLTYPE(v_clob));
2. Read cell value from XML column and extract to insert into another table
DECLARE
CURSOR c_xml IS
(SELECT trim(y.cvalue)
FROM XMLTAB xt,
XMLTable('/Table/Rows/Cells/Cell' PASSING xt.XMLDoc
COLUMNS
cvalue
VARCHAR(50)
PATH '/') y;
    BEGIN
OPEN c_xml;
FETCH c_xml INTO v_TempValue;
<Generate insert statement into another table>
EXIT WHEN c_xml%NOTFOUND;
CLOSE c_xml;
    END
And one more problem is performance issue when XML file is big, first step to load XML content to XMLTYPE column slowly.
Could you please suggest any solution to read large XML file and improve performance?
Thank you in advance.
Hiko

See Mark Drake's (Product Manager Oracle XMLDB, Oracle US) response in this old post: ORA-31167: 64k size limit for XML node
The "in a future release" reference, means that this boundary 64K / node issue, was lifted in 11g and onwards...
So first of all, if not only due to performance improvements, I would strongly suggest to upgrade to a database version which is supported by Oracle, see My Oracle Support... In short Oracle 10.2.x was in extended support up to summer 2013, if I am not mistaken and is currently not supported anymore...
If you are able to able to upgrade, please use the much, much more performing XMLType Securefile Binary XML storage option, instead of the XMLType (Basicfile) CLOB storage option.
HTH

Passing variable of size greater than 32767 from Pro*C to PL/SQL procedure

Hi,
I am trying to pass a variable os size greater than 32767 from Pro*C to an SQL procedure.I tried assigning the host variable directly to a CLOB in the SQL section but nothing happens.In the below code the size of l_var1 is 33000.PROC_DATA is a procedure that takes CLOB as input and gives the other three(Data,Err_Code,Err_Msg) as output.These variables are declared globally.
Process_Data(char* l_var1)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
l_clob := :l_var1
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
I also tried using DBMS_LOB.This was the code that i used.
Process_Data(char* l_var1)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
DBMS_LOB.CREATETEMPORARY(l_clob,TRUE);
DBMS_LOB.OPEN(l_clob,dbms_lob.lob_readwrite);
DBMS_LOB.WRITE (l_clob, LENGTH (:l_var1), 1,:l_var1);
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
Here since DBMS_LOB packages allow a maximum of 32767,the value of l_var1 is not being assigned to l_clob.
I am able to do the above process provided i split l_var1 into two variables and then append to l_clob using WRITEAPPEND.i.e l_var1 is 32000 in length and l_var2 contains the rest.
Process_Data(char* l_var1,char* l_var2)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
dbms_lob.createtemporary(l_clob,TRUE);
dbms_lob.OPEN(l_clob,dbms_lob.lob_readwrite);
DBMS_LOB.WRITE (l_clob, LENGTH (:l_var1), 1,:l_var1);
DBMS_LOB.WRITEAPPEND (l_clob, LENGTH(:l_var2), :l_var2);
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
But the above code requires dynamic memory allocation in Pro*C which i would like to avoid.Could you let me know if there is any other way to perform the above?

Hi,
The Long Datatype has been deprecated use Clob or Blob. This will solve lot of problems inherent with the datatype.
Regards,
Ganesh R

Char types size greater than 256 in DOE

What is the standard to use characters with types size greater than 256 characters in DOE (bapiwrapper)?

Use STRING for length greater than 256 characters. In DOE, you should select TEXT_MEMO checkbox while defining node attribute in Data Object.

Index size greater than table size

HI ,
While checking the large segments , I came to know that index HZ_PARAM_TAB_N1 is larger than table HZ_PARAM_TAB . I think it's highly fragmented and requires defragmentation . Need your suggestion on the same that how can I collect more information on the same . Providing you more information .
1.
select sum(bytes)/1024/1024/1024,segment_name from dba_segments group by segment_name having sum(bytes)/1024/1024/1024 > 1 order by 1 desc;
SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024/1024 SEGMENT_NAME
81.2941895 HZ_PARAM_TAB_N1
72.1064453 SYS_LOB0000066009C00004$$
52.7703857 HZ_PARAM_TAB
2. Index code
<pre>
COLUMN_NAME COLUMN_POSITION
ITEM_KEY 1
PARAM_NAME 2
</pre>
Regards
Rahul

Hi ,
Thanks . I know that rebuild will defragment it . But as I'm on my new site , I was looking for some more supporting information before drafting the mail on the same that it requires re org activity .It's not possible for an index to have the size greater than tables as it contains only 2 columns values + rowid . Whereas tables contains 6 columns .
<pre>
Name      Datatype      Length      Mandatory      Comments
ITEM_KEY      VARCHAR2      (240)      Yes      Unique identifier for the event raised
PARAM_NAME      VARCHAR2      (2000)      Yes      Name of the parameter
PARAM_CHAR      VARCHAR2      (4000)
     Value of the parameter only if its data type is VARCHAR2.
PARAM_NUM      NUMBER
     Value of the parameter only if its data type is NUM.
PARAM_DATE      DATE
     Value of the parameter only if its data type is DATE.
PARAM_INDICATOR      VARCHAR2      (3)      Yes      Indicates if the parameter contains existing, new or >replacement values. OLD values currently exist. NEW values create initial values or replace existing values.</pre>
Regds
Rahul

Biztalk AS2 encryption error for file bigger than 100MB

I am getting following error when I am trying to receive file bigger than 100 MB. I was getting same error when I was trying file bigger than 5MB and I applied windows CU5. Now I can receive big file (I tested till 60 MB). New file which is coming is 110MB
and we start getting this error.
Can somebody help me to figure out this issue.
I am using Biztalk 2010 with windows 2008 server
A message received by adapter "HTTP" on receive location "RecLocAS2All" with URI "/xxxxxx/BTSHTTPReceive.dll" is suspended.
Error details: An output message of the component "Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.PipelineComponents" in receive pipeline "Microsoft.BizTalk.EdiInt.DefaultPipelines.AS2Receive, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiIntPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" is suspended due to the following error:
An error occurred when decrypting an AS2 message..
The sequence number of the suspended message is 2.

I tried passthrough pipeline and I can receive encrypted file.Now trying to write code to decrypt it but I can not. Based on certificate I can say it is RSASHAI, so using it for decrypt. But getting error at Convert.FromBase64String(text) where text
is encrypted test from file.
I am getting following error
The input is not a valid Base-64 string as it contains a non-base 64 character,
more than two padding characters, or an illegal character among the padding characters.
Can somebody help me to understand it and resolve this. Mean time trying
to convene customer for compressed file .Please help me to understand above error.

Why is audio file size larger than in Flash?

I use both Flash and Captivate. Final file size is a big consideration. I wondered why the file size of the audio in Captivate is almost twice as large as the same audio if it's used in Flash. I'm using the same audio settings for both. Does anyone know what causes the audio compression to be different in Captivate than in Flash?

OK, sounds like memory will be fine, so let's look at some other stuff...
Is it only one particularly keynote presentation that slows up for you, or does keynote behave in the same way even if you start from scratch and create a new presentation?
If it's just the one presentation then there's probably some content (possibly video) within it that KN takes exception to. Sometimes a single problematic slide or piece of content can slow down the whole app.
Is the problematic presentation one that was imported from Powerpoint? If so, import it again and look carefully at the import error/warning logs.
Before you start keynote, start up activity monitor - which will give you an indication of what programs are using all the CPU/memory/disk bandwidth etc. You'll then have an idea of whether it is KN maxing out on CPU or whether anything else is dragging the system down.
Another thing you could try would be to log in to a different user account on your machine (create one if necessary) and then try opening the presentation from within this different account. If this works for you then it suggests a problem with the keynote plist file in your original user account.
I don't know if it'd be acceptable to you, but if you could post a link to your problematic presentation then I could download it and try it out on my normally reliable Keynote on one of my computers. (Make sure that you've ticked the box to embed all media in the presentation)
Hope some of this is helpful,
Mike.

File Upload greater than 30 MB

How can i restrict the user to upload file greater than 30Mb.I can restrict by using "maxUploadSize" of commons-fileupload but the issue is that it raises exception only after the whole file gets uploaded.
Can we restrict before this?
Thanks in advance
CSJakharia

elOpalo wrote:
How about:request.getContentLength()?
Is it also available after the whole request is sent?That's the whole problem; everything stated in this thread works after the request has already been generated, thus the entire file is already in there. Hence my suggestion to limit the maximum request size to prevent too much data from being uploaded.

Errors Calculating File Size for 4.7MB DVD's

I have been seeing a lot of errors when Encore calculates the total disc capacity in the "Disc" tab. Sometimes it will say my total file size is say 6.3GB and won't all fit on a 4.7GB disc. I re-transcode select AVI's at the LOWEST setting rather than 'automatic' and then I re-check the pie-chart on the Disc Tab. I get very odd results - sometimes it actually goes up when I set an AVI to the Lowest setting. Last week I finally had everything set so the all my media would fit on a 4.7 DVD and I made an image. When I got to work today I looked at the File and it was 6.8GB - I know it was calculating as being less than 4.7 last Friday. What's going on? I reset all the Transcoding settings today and again got the files down to fit on a 4.7 disc (4.68) I know thats cutting it close but when I finished transcoding and looked at the new image it was only 3.8GB.
Has anyone else experienced this problem? Could it be my system? I'm pushing it to its limits while a wait for a new machine -- but I never had this problem with Encore 1.5.

No. But it does indicate that there is 526KB Used for DVD ROM Content. I hit the "Clear" button and it says NOT SET - but still lists 526KB. This seems like it may be the default "reserve" or something.

Broadcasting results not transferring to AL11 if file size more than 3 MB

Hi All,
I am broadcasting Workbook results to AL11(application server) by using SAP standard program. If the result file is more than 3MB pre calculation working fine but file is not transferring to application server. Could please let me is there is setting to increase the transfer limit to AL11. Infact I am in touch with Ba
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
J B

Hi Inder,
As per sap recommendation we would be able to handle 100 MB, you need to tune your server by increasing the [arametersso that you would be able to handle the messages with big payload.
By default the parameter icm/HTTP/max_request_size_KB will be 10240 which can handle 100MB of file size.if you increase the parameter value by tuning ur system you can process a file bigger than that..
Please refer to the below links for reference....
[link1|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/58/108b02102344069e4a31758bc2c810/content.htm]
[link2|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/de/95/1528d8ca4648869ec3ceafc975101c/content.htm]
as per the above suggestions the best practice is to sand as a multiple idocs splitting into chunks.
Cheers!!!!
Naveen.

PUT Blobs of size greater than 5.5MB fail with HTTPS but not HTTP

I have written a Cygwin app that uploads (using the REST API PUT operation) Block Blobs to my Azure storage account, and it works well for different size blobs when using HTTP. However, use of SSL (i.e. PUT using HTTPS) fails for Blobs greater than 5.5MB.
Blobs less than 5.5MB upload correctly. Anything greater and I find that the TCP session (as seen by Wireshark) reports a dwindling window size that goes to 0 once the aforementioned number of bytes have been transferred. The failure is very repeatable and
consistent. As a point of reference, PUT operations against my Google/AWS/HP accounts work fine when using HTTPS for various object sizes, which suggests my problem is not in my client but specific to the HTTPS implementation on the MSAZURE storage servers.
If I upload the 5.5MB blob as two separate uploads of 4MB and 1.5MB followed by a PUT Block List, the operation succeeds as long as the two uploads used
separate HTTPS sessions. Notice the emphasis on separate. That same operation fails if I attempt to maintain an HTTPS session across both uploads. This is another data point that seems to suggest that the Storage
server has a problem
Any ideas on why I might be seeing this odd behavior that appears very specific to MS Azure HTTPS, but is not seen when used against AWS/Google/HP cloud storage servers?

Hi,
I'm getting this problem also when trying to upload blobs > 5.5mb using the Azure PHP SDK with HTTPS.
There is no way I can find to get a blob > 5.5mb to upload, unless you use http, rather than https, which is not a good solution.
I've written my own scripts to use the HTTP_Request2 library, to send the request as a test, and it fails with that also when using the 'socket' method.
However, if I write a script using the PHP Curl extension directly, then it works fine, and blobs > 5.5mb get uploaded.
It seems to be irrelevant which method is used, uploading in 1 go, or using smaller chunks, the PHP SDK seems broken.
Also, I think I've found another bug in the SDK, when you do the smaller chunks, the assigning of the BlockID is not correct.
In: WindowsAzure/Blob/BlobRestProxy.php
Line: $block->setBlockId(base64_encode(str_pad($counter++, '0', 6)));
That is incorrect usage of the str_pad function, and if you upload a huge blob that needs splitting, then the blockIDs will after a while become a different length and therefore fail.
It should be: str_pad($counter++, 6, '0',STR_PAD_LEFT);
I also think there is 1 too many base64_encodes() in there, as I think its being done twice, once in that line, and then again within the createBlobBlock() just before the send() for a 2nd time.
Can someone please advice, when this/these bug(s) will be fixed in the PHP SDK, as at the moment its useless to me as I cant upload things securely.

Why is my "Combined PDF" file size smaller than the original files?

Hello!
I am trying to combine two individual PDF files into a single PDF. Each file is 32mb, however when I use acrobat to combine them, the newly created "combined" file is only 19mb. I believe I've taken the necessary steps to ensure no degradation is happening (i.e. selecting Large File Size in the options panel), but I am still puzzled as to how two files can be put together as one and be smaller than the two separate files with out any compression. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance!

When you combine a file it does a "Save As" operation. This re-writes all of the PDF object in the single file and is supposed to clean up the file, whereas the single files may have had multiple saves which when you look at the internals of the PDF file simply add on to the end of the file. In other words you get a more cleanly written and optimized file that is also saved for Fast Web View.

AS2 decryption error on file sizes greater than 5MB.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for