ASO aggregation Issue. Not rolling up to parents.

hg
Edited by: user7805819 on Jan 13, 2011 4:08 PM

I don't have anything open to test syntax right now but something like
Case
When
currentmember([Scenario]) is [Actual] and
currentmember([Version]) is [Fina;] and
ISlevel([Total Product].currentmember,0)
and Not IS([Total Product].currentmember,[XXXXX])
Then
20
When
currentmember([Scenario]) is [Actual] and
currentmember([Version]) is [Fina;] and
NOT ISlevel([Total Product].currentmember,0) THEN
sum([Total Product].currentmember.children,[measure])
End
where measure is the member name you are performaing the calculation on (where the 20 gets put). It has been a whild so you might need additional ({}) around the tuple to make it a set

Similar Messages

Data not rolling up to Parent Level

Working on BPC 7.5 Level 10
Member set of report are on base level.
Data Present on 2014.AUG but not rolling up to parent.

Naveen,
I am storing Data with Periodic Measures.
Jan          Feb          Mar          Q1
100          50                              0          --- Q1 will be 0 as your ACCTYPE is AST/LEQ
Now when i change the Measures in REPORT to YTD or Keep Periodic(By default AST and LEQ account type will refer to YTD).
Jan          Feb          Mar          Q1
100          50                             0
As per the logic explained by you
--> Data present for JAN,FEB on Periodic 100,50 - Yes . But when you say Feb Data is 50 it means your value has reduced from 100 in Jan to 50 in Feb which means the periodic value of Feb is -50. Dont get confused. For AST/LEQ value of 50 in Feb means the total balance till Feb is 50. You are getting 0 in Q1 as your March value has become 0 which means your total balance at the end of March is 0 and hence your Q1 ending March shows value 0. If you post something in March then your Q1 will show the same value.
For AST/LEQ the Q1 value is same as the March value and Year.TOTAL value is same as Dec Value.
-->Data should be when YTD JAN,FEB 100,150. For AST/LEQ ACCTYPES Measure YTD and Periodic show same values as AST and LEQ are YTD in nature by default.
Nikhil

Entity data in alternate rollup not rolling up to parent.

We have a number of different entity hierarchies in our application. In our main entity hierarchy we have system rules setup to pull specific account data down to STAT accounts for particular entities and then that same STAT account data is pulled over to another entity multiplied by -1 as an offset so when the two entities rollup to a common parent the result is 0. This offset entity exists in other hierarchies. In the other hierarchies this offset entity STA account data does not rollup to the parent. The data only shows up to Parent Currency Total in the value dimension. Anything above that is empty, but viewing the parent.child combo in the main hierarchy and we can see data populated all the way up to Contribution Total, therefore roling up to the parent. Below is the rules we have setup.
Here in simplier terms is what we see.
Hierarchy 1
Entity A = $10
Entity B = -$10
Parent Entity C = $0
Hierarchy 2
Entity B = -$10 (Entity A does not exist in this hierarchy)
Parent Entity D = $0 (should be -$10)
Has anyone see an issue like this before?
Rule
If HS.Scenario.Member <> "ProForma" Then
   If HS.Value.Member <> "[Elimination]" Then
If HS.Entity.Member() = "E261" Then
   HS.Clear "A#AC90285"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90285 = A#AC76740"
   HS.Clear "A#AC90286"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90286 = A#AC70160"
End If
If HS.Entity.Member() = "E271" Then
   HS.Clear "A#AC90285"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90285 = A#AC76740"
   HS.Clear "A#AC90286"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90286 = A#AC70160"
End If
'E103 - Corporate offset
If YearPOV > "2013" Then
If EntityPOV = "E103" Then
   HS.Clear "A#AC90285"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90285.I#[ICP None] = (E#E300.A#AC90285.I#[ICP Top] + E#E104.A#AC90285.I#[ICP Top]) * (-1)"
   HS.Clear "A#AC90286"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90286.I#[ICP None] = (E#E300.A#AC90286.I#[ICP Top] + E#E104.A#AC90286.I#[ICP Top]) * (-1)"
   HS.Clear "A#AC90287"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90287.I#[ICP None] = (E#E300.A#AC90287.I#[ICP Top] + E#E104.A#AC90287.I#[ICP Top]) * (-1)"
   HS.Clear "A#AC90288"
   HS.Exp "A#AC90288.I#[ICP None] = (E#E300.A#AC90288.I#[ICP Top] + E#E104.A#AC90288.I#[ICP Top]) * (-1)"
End If
End If

There are trigger account rules, but not for this scenario. This also occurred before we added those rules. If you see below in our main hierarchy E100 we have a corporate offset for -2,695,080 which goes against the data rolling up in E104 and E300. In the secondary hierarchy only E103 exists with one other entity E428 and for some reason that offset data does not roll up to the parent E060.

EVDRE- Child member values not rolling up to Parent

Dear Freinds,
I am using 4 Hierarchy in Account DIM. I am facing a problem that for second hierarchy child member values not summing up to Parent.
Dimentioned processed sucessfully.
Thanks ! in advance.

Have you recently implemented EHP1?
If so there is a common issue with the hierarchy tables - refer to OSS note 1139396
Hope this helps

ASO members with formula not rolling up

Hi Gurus,
In our ASO cube we have a members which caluclate % are not rolling up to parent . Its rolling up for MTD but they are not rolling for QTD . Members are in Account dimension .Please let me know if you require more info to get the excat idea .

These are MDX formula members, right? Is the problem that the results are recalculated at the QTD level rather than the MTD level summing up the Period dimension?
Is Period a stored dimension? The members / formulae in dynamic dimensions or hierarchies will always be calculated after roll-up of stored dimensions / hierarchies.
See the section on 'Calculation Order' here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E26232_01/doc.11122/esb_dbag/alocare.html#alocare1058144
If that is the problem you're seeing, the only options are a) to use an ASO calculation to derive the percentages as stored values, which can then roll up in stored hierarchies, or b) calculate the percentages outside of Essbase - in a relational staging area, for example.

OBIEE 10g Amounts not rolling up

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in rolling up myamount totals.
I need to create a calculated column in RPD based on another fact column.(Amount2 is the calulated item that I have created)
Amount1 - my existing fact column
Amount2 - my new calculated column created at logical level.
My results :
Below report is at Quarter level. The totals displayed for Amount2 are wrong. The total displayed is same as that of Amount1 total
Table
Rgn
Quarter
Amount 1
Amount2
R1
1
24,578,396.33
24,578,396.33
2
96,133,672.22
96,133,672.22
3
42,639,566.27
25,954,518.60
4
58,333,616.34
0.00
Grand Total
221,685,251.16
221,685,251.16
and when i roll up at year level the amount 2 does not roll up to the correct total and display only 0
Table
Rgn
Amount1
Amount2
R1
221,685,251.16
0.00
Grand Total
221,685,251.16
0.00
Can you please help me, where I have gone wrong.
Areas where i can cross check, if I have missed any step.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance.
Achala

Thank you for the reply.
This is the formula used for Amount 2:
CASE WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) = 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 = EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Q1" * EXTRACT( DAY_OF_QUARTER FROM CURRENT_DATE ) / 91
WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) <> 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 = EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Q1" * EXTRACT( DAY_OF_QUARTER FROM CURRENT_DATE ) / 90
WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 2 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 2 = EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Q2" * EXTRACT( DAY_OF_QUARTER FROM CURRENT_DATE ) / 91
WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 3 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 3 = EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Q3" * EXTRACT( DAY_OF_QUARTER FROM CURRENT_DATE ) / 92
WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 4 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 4 = EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) THEN TST."Fact-Q4" * EXTRACT( DAY_OF_QUARTER FROM CURRENT_DATE ) / 92
WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) = 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 < EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Total_Amount" WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) <> 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 < EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Total_Amount" WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 2 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 2 < EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Total_Amount" WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 3 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 3 < EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Total_Amount" WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 4 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 4 < EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN TST."Fact-Total_Amount" WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) = 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 > EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN 0 WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 1 AND MOD( EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ), 4) <> 0 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 1 > EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN 0 WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 2 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 2 > EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN 0 WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 3 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 3 > EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE )
THEN 0 WHEN TST."Dim-Time"."Quarter" = 4 AND EXTRACT( YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) = TST."Dim-Time"."Year" AND 4 > EXTRACT( QUARTER_OF_YEAR FROM CURRENT_DATE ) THEN 0 ELSE TST."Fact-Total_Amount" END
In the above formula:
TST."Fact-Total_Amount" is an aggregated to sum logical column, similarly TST."Fact-Q1", TST."Fact-Q2", TST."Fact-Q3", TST."Fact-Q4" are also aggregated to sum logical columns.
Please let me know your findings.
Many Thanks,
Kind Regards,
Achala

Aggregation issue Bex report

Hi all,
I am facing the following aggregation issue at reporing level. BW system 3.5
Cube1
Material, Company code, Cost center, Material, Month,   Volume KF
Cube2
Material, Company code, Cost center, Material, Month,   Price KF
Multi provider
Material, Company code, Cost center, Material, Month,   Volume KF, Price KF
Report
- Global Calculated key figure 'Value' is based on basic KF's Volume KF, Price KF
- Time of aggregation is set to " Before aggregation" in propery of Calculated Key Figure.
- There is only one characteristics 'Company code' is used in report.
When, I execute this report, Calculated KF is not working (No values), If I change Time of aggregation " After aggregation" in propery of Calculated Key Figure, then It works but wrong values.Price gets aggregated(add ups) and multiply with Volume which is wrong.
Can you please give me a Ideal solution to resolve this.
Thanks,
Harry

Hi all,
Can I assume that there is no solution for this issue ??
Thanks,
Harry

S_ALR_87013532 report -plan cost not rolling upto the WBS/Project level

Dear All,
Plan cost from production orders is not rolling up to the WBS/Project level in S_ALR_87013532 ( Plan/Actual Variance report).
Where as plan cost from network is properly rolling up to the WBS/Project level in the above report.
Please suggest what could be the reason for this issue. Is any configuration needs to be done for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Dear sir,
Thanks for the reply & sorry for late response from my side.
OPSV settings are already maintained in our system.
Some how i realized later that cost are actaully getting rolled to the WBS level, but we have observed one more discrepancy.
Example -
Production order "X" value - 100 ( as seen through co03)
Production order "X"value- 40 ( as seen through report s_alr_87013532).
We found that in report s_alr_87013532 , although my total producton order value of 100 is represented at the WBS /Project level, but at the production order level , it is showing value of 40.
On further analysis we found that for production order X
Materail cost- 60
Labour cost-40
The material cost of 60 is not getting fetched against production order "X" in report " S_ALR_87013532".
There are very few cases , where such discrepancy is seen.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Vishal

Data at base level not consolidating to the parent entity

HI All
I have an issue with data which exisits at the base level but do not consolidate to its parent entity.
For example,
2000
2001
2002
2003
Here only 2002 has data, but that is not appearing at 2000. I have checked the accounts and there we have set the IsConsolidated property.
The consolidation happens for other entities like 1000 & 3000. The problem is only with 2000.
Has anyone come accross this before and what is the best way to fix this?
Thanks,
Appu

Is it possible that you have not activated consolidation of the entities for the period you want to consolidate? Check out the Ownership Management screens for the entity 2000. Are all child entities set to Active? Is the proper Method set? Is the PCON = 100?
Also have you tried to select one of the child entities (e.g. 2001) and run the Force Calculate Contribution? What does this entity return at the +[Contribution]+ level?

Aggregation issue for report with bw structure

Hi,
I am facing aggregation issue while grouping reports in webi.
We have a BW query with 16 values, which we bring to bw as structure. Out of 16, 8 are percentage values (agg. type should be average).
If we bring the data at site level, data is comming properly. But if we use same query and try sum/grouping( on region level), then percentage is getting added.
Since it's a dashboard report with lots of filters, we cannot go for seperate query at each level(site, region, zone).
How we can resolve this.. please give me suggestion.
Regards
Baby

Hi,
Since we were using structure, it was not possible to produce the required result in BO.
We change structure to keyfigures and bring all of them in to BO. All the column formulas are now in BO side.
Now it is working fine.
Regards
Baby
Edited by: Baby on May 10, 2010 11:39 AM

ESSBASE Aggregation Issue.

Hi,
I am facing a serious problem with Essbase. Iam implementing Hyperion Planning 11.1.2.2 for one of our client and first time I am implementing this version.
The aggregation is not working in my setup. I have written a rule to aggregate the hierarchy. I have tried with AGG, CALC DIM, etc. But still the same issue.
I have also tried running the Calculate web form rule file, but still aggregation is not happening.
I have also noticed that in Planning Dimension maintenance, even the level 0 members showing the consolidation operation.
Any body has clue?
Please help me as I am unable to proceed further.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sunil.

It is probably worth testing your script as a calc script and then run it directly against the essbase database using EAS, then check the data with Smart View, this process should eliminate any issues in planning or calc manager.
If you are still having problems then post your script and I am sure somebody will give you some further advice.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Container transaction NOT rolled back after a long period of time.

Hi, I am using Weblogic 6.1SP5 on RedHat 7.1 and I have seen an unexpected
          behaviour with an MDB and I would like to know if there is any circumstance
          in which a transaction is not rolled back automatically by the container
          after the transaction timeout specified on MDB descriptor expired.
          The fact is I have seen a thread locked for 3 entire days without any
          exception being raised (the trans timeout was set to 900 seconds for
          debugging porpouses)
          Sadly I didn't thought on issuing a ps -ax and a netstat -np in order to see
          if there was any connection active for any of the JVM threads.
          As an aside note I had to throw a kill -9 to Weblogic's JVM in order to
          completely stop it because using the standard "stopWeblogic.sh" script it
          got stalled.
          The only unusual thing that I can think of the MDB is doing is opening a
          connection against a remote system via a socket.
          My question is. Is it possible that a thread locked on I/O (in this case a
          socket) to be out of control in terms of throwing at it a "Transaction
          rolled back exception"?
          I have modified my code in order to set SO_TIMEOUT on the socket just in
          case the other peer hangs and never returns control. But I would like to
          know the problem could be there.
          I know for sure that at the time the thread stalled the other peer died
          (exceptions on other MDBs trying to connect to remote system) but I expected
          a "socket exception" to be thrown by the O.S. to the stalled thread instead
          of having the thread waiting forever on that "open" socket.
          Thanks in advance.
          Ignacio.


While a tramsaction may be rolled back at the transaction timeout,
          the thread is not stopped. The actual exception won't occur until
          the MDB completes. If the MDB doesn't complete (as in this case),
          you won't get the exception.
          "Ignacio G. Dupont" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
          > Hi, I am using Weblogic 6.1SP5 on RedHat 7.1 and I have seen an unexpected
          > behaviour with an MDB and I would like to know if there is any circumstance
          > in which a transaction is not rolled back automatically by the container
          > after the transaction timeout specified on MDB descriptor expired.
          >
          > The fact is I have seen a thread locked for 3 entire days without any
          > exception being raised (the trans timeout was set to 900 seconds for
          > debugging porpouses)
          >
          > Sadly I didn't thought on issuing a ps -ax and a netstat -np in order to see
          > if there was any connection active for any of the JVM threads.
          >
          > As an aside note I had to throw a kill -9 to Weblogic's JVM in order to
          > completely stop it because using the standard "stopWeblogic.sh" script it
          > got stalled.
          >
          > The only unusual thing that I can think of the MDB is doing is opening a
          > connection against a remote system via a socket.
          >
          > My question is. Is it possible that a thread locked on I/O (in this case a
          > socket) to be out of control in terms of throwing at it a "Transaction
          > rolled back exception"?
          >
          > I have modified my code in order to set SO_TIMEOUT on the socket just in
          > case the other peer hangs and never returns control. But I would like to
          > know the problem could be there.
          >
          > I know for sure that at the time the thread stalled the other peer died
          > (exceptions on other MDBs trying to connect to remote system) but I expected
          > a "socket exception" to be thrown by the O.S. to the stalled thread instead
          > of having the thread waiting forever on that "open" socket.
          >
          > Thanks in advance.
          >
          > Ignacio.
          >
          >

Data not rolling up of a dynamic calc member for a particular entity

Hi,
In my planning application data is not rolling up of a dynamic calc member for a particular entity whereas it is working fine for other entity.
Please find below the sample Smartview Retrieve
----------------Member_ALL---Member_None---Member Top---Member_ALL---Member_None---Member Top
----------------Entity 1----------Entity 1------------Entity 1----------Entity 2----------Entity 2------------Entity 2
Acc1------------100----------------#--------------------#---------------122---------------#-------------------122
NOTE: # denotes missing
Member_ALL and Member_None are children of Member_Top. Both Member_ALL and Member_Top are Dynamic Calc whereas Member_None is Store.
As shown above data is rolling upto Member Top for entity 2 while it is not getting rolled up for Entity 1.
Request you to please help in finding the error.
Thanks in Advance'
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
Is Acct 1 Dynamic Calc? In that case will it NOT calculate the combination MemberTop->Entity1 as Member_ALL->Entity1 + Member_None->Entity1.
I beleive it'll calculate the Acct1 member again for Member Top based on the dynamic formula (whatever the logic). If you make it Acct1 Stored, then the aggregation will be correct by first calculating and storing the Acct1 member and then AGG the Member dimension.
Cheers,
Abhishek

Aggregator did not receive statistics from [sb03] for the current view

I'm receiving a warning message in a BEA Aqualogic Service Bus console "Aggregator did not receive statistics from [sb03, sb05, sb06, sb04, sb02, sb01] for the current view".
I don´t have any idea what is the root cause of this issue.
Thanks,
Norberto Enomoto

Norberto,
I've found this link with a list of SB Runtime Messages.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/messages/alsb/kernel/l10n/ServiceDomainMBean.html
One of this refer to the problem you're having:
BEA-473051
Error: Aggregator did not receive statistics from servers for the current view
Description
     There is a communication failure between Aggregator server and other managed servers. One of the managed servers failed to send statistics to the managed server on which Aggregator is running.
Cause
     Communication failure between managed servers.
Action
     Wait for some time and try again.
Att.
José Compadre Junior
Edited by: user10076953 on 22/03/2010 11:09
Edited by: user10076953 on 22/03/2010 11:09

Notification bar not rolling down in z3

In my xepria z3 notification bar is not rolling down while the screen is in portrait mode. I guess its a software problem because its been almost 8 months im using it and i have never faced this kinda problem until i updated to andriod 5.1.1. And if you suggesting my screen has a crack, well it doesnt i checked several times, when it comes to my cell phone im extra careful with it. So please look into the problem and fix it ASAP.

I suggest that you try to repair the phone software using PC Companion..
Before repairing your device you may want to backup your information first. Check out this topic for more information on how to.
How to backup?
If the issue should still remain I think that this needs to be examined and fixed at a repair center. For more information about how to submit your phone for repair and where, contact your local support team.

ASO aggregation Issue. Not rolling up to parents.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for