Assessment Cycle for Planned Cost

Hi,
I have production cost centers and dept cost centers for which cost center planning has been maintained in KP06. I have maintained assessment cycle for planned costs with planned skf. When I run the cycle, system is apportioning the costs based on the factors maintained.
However on execution, without test tun, the system is posting the costs to the receiver cost centers as Actual Costs and not Planned Costs..
Can anyone tell me what is the reason?

Hi,
Have you created ur assessment cycle in T.Code: S_ALR_87005540 - Define Assessment for Plan cost (or) S_ALR_87005742 - Define Assessment for Actual cost. Assessment cycle execution t.code. KSUB for Plant cost posting. and KSU5 for actual cost posting.
If you define cycle in S_ALR_87005540, Please check have u select Plan (or) Actual Radio button
Thanks

Similar Messages

How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level?

Dear all,
How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level? The plan cost is done in network activity in CJ20N.
I am not able to check using CJI4 or CJI9 report.
Kindly advise.
Thanks and regards,
Jessie

Hi Jess,
Have you checked the navigation part which is being displayed on left hand side of report S_ALR_87013565 and S_ALR_87013533.? There you have option to check transaction currency and object currency when you double click on it.
In case if it is not being displayed under navigation. Then you can bring them on from transaction code CJE2. For eg: Report group for S_ALR_87013533 is 12KST1C. Double click on it and it will open up to do changes in report layout and many more. There you also have options to bring on transaction currency too. Similarly, you can check for other report groups as well just by checking the report description.
But I am not sure if suits your requirements. Wait for other experts to comment on this.
Regards,
Amit

Table for plan cost

Which is the table where we can get wbs description & plan cost in PS?
Amit

For WBS description, please use table PRPS. Use the field POSID.I dont know whether there is any table for plan cost.However we use table COSS for Cost totals for internal postings & table COSP for Cost totals for external postings.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Tushar
PS: Reward points if it is useful.

Issue - automatic release block in MRBR for planned costs (tol KW/PP)

Tolerance key KW is defined for planned costs. The tolerance is correctly selected in MIRO and invoices are blocked appropriately; there is no issue in MIRO.
The block for planned costs is indicated as a price variance in MRBR and the condition is listed. When MRBR is executed in 'Release Automatically' mode, system checks the tolerances defined under tolerance key PP rather than KW. MRM_TOLERANCE_CHECK is called for tolerance key PP.
Because the tolerance amount for tolerance key PP is checked rather than tolerance key KW (planned costs), invoices are released erroneously. The tolerance for KW should be checked instead.
Has anyone encountered this issue? If so, what action did you take?
Thank you in advance.

Thank you for your input. However, this does not solve the issue. The tolerances should be checked appropriately in MRBR in the same way as in MIRO. KW should be checked for planned costs and PP for the articles.

Execution of assessment cycles for Costcenter group

Hi Friends,
   i have a program which excutes assessment cycles for 1 costcenter.
    now i need to run the program for multiple costcenter
(costcenter group)
eg: in the selection screen if user enter the costcenter group ........ program needs to get all the costcenters in the group and run the cycles for those costcenters.
can any help me with .. how to get the costcenters when user enters costcenter group in the selection screen.
any suggestions would be helpful.
Thanks in advance

Try:
call function 'K_HIERARCHY_TABLES_READ'
       exporting
            e_class                     = '0101'
            e_setid                     = setid
            e_kokrs                     = '1234'
            e_mandt                     = sy-mandt
            e_master_data               = 'XXX'
            e_structure                 = 'X X0200'
            e_replace_class             = space
            e_replace_unit              = space
            e_suffix                    = space
       tables
            t_nodes                     = it_ccg_nodes
            t_values                    = it_ccg_values
       changing
            c_info                      = c_info
            c_overwrite                 = c_overwrite
       exceptions
            no_controlling_area         = 1
            no_chart_of_account         = 2
            different_controlling_areas = 3
            different_chart_of_accounts = 4
            set_not_found               = 5
            illegal_field_replacement   = 6
            illegal_table_replacement   = 7
            fm_raise                    = 8
            convert_error               = 9
            no_overwrite_standard_hier = 10
            no_bukrs_for_kokrs          = 11
            others                      = 12.

Assessment Cycle(KSU5) - Allocating Cost for Only One Month

Hi,
I want to allocate cost relating 2008 from cost centres to WBS. For that I'm trying run the assessment cycle(ksu5). The test results shows allocation of cost for the month of Sep2008. i.e It doesn't allocate cost that are posted before sep and after september though the cost centre has costs from Apr 2008. My Assessment cycle period starts from 01.04.2008 and is valid for the whole year till 31.03.2009. I've 3 WBS elements to which the costs for the whole year has to be posted according to the no. of hours. Among 3WBS one is created in the month of Apr 2008 and the other is created in Aug 2008 and the last one is create in Dec 2008.
So Can anyone tell me why the cost is not posted for all the months.
Thanks in Advance
Harikrishnan L G

Hi,
Please check the Cumulative indicator in the Assessment Cycle definition. If the Cycle is not cumulative then it would not include costs of earlier month for allocation.
Go to - KSU2 and in the Header screen you will find the check box called Cumulative.
While executing the cycle through KSU5 in the selection screen you will have to specify period from and period to. It will automatically consider all costs upto the period.
Thanks,
Sanjib

COPA assessment cycles for revenue postings

Dear SAP gurus,
is it possible to allocate revenues to COPA via assessment cycles (tcode KEU5)? We have service income related revenues that are not linked to COGS therefore they are posted to Cost Centers but they need to be visible in the cOPA report to have a complete profitability by product. at the moment I am not allowed as revenue are considered statistical postings... any clue how can I solve this?
Thanks
Monica

Hi Monica
Welcome to SDN!
I dont agree with the responses provided above.. As far as I know, statistical postings can neither be settled, nor can they be allocated
Catg 11 cost elements post statistically to Cost Centers.. Hence, you cant allocate...
For the postings made till now, Manually update COPA using KE21N (If you are using Costing Based COPA)
Way Forward: Make your service income postings in an Internal Order and you can settle the same to COPA and then allocate using Top Down Dist KE28...
Try note 605281 and see if it allows to use IO as senders in KEU5....
BR,Ajay M

Table for planned cost

Hi All
In which Table and field can i find planned costs for maintenance order. I need this info for individual orders and not collective planned costs.
Thanx in advance.

Ruhail,
You should be able to get that from table PMCO. It holds the cost for the order at the Value category level. You would have to sum up the cost from different value categories to arrive at the total planned cost of the order. The estimate and actual cost at the value category level is also available from the same table.
The same information can also be obtained from the controlling tables of COSS,COSP and COEP.
Regards
Narasimhan

Reserval of Assessment Cycles for closed periods - FAGLGA15

Hello,
We have assessment cycles in closed periods which we want to reverse / repost in current period. We are using ECC New GL functionality. Tcode KISR does not seem to recognize Assessment cycles created with FAGLGA1* .
Suggestions / options to achieve the end result, please.
Regards
Jayesh.

Hi:
If your CO allocation has some external postings (like GL or fixed assets) or generating some intercompany documents, then it needs FI to be open also. It happens sometimes if the allocation goes external so it would need fI period to be open also. If FI is close but CO is open, it would only work for CO specific allocations and others would error out.
Please check the cycle/segment which is in error. If it is suppose to hit FI, then FI (OB52) and CO (OKP1) periods should be in sync.
Thanks.
Rahul

Table for Planned cost & Budgeted value with WBS

Hi,
Which is the table where we can get WBS description & planned cost in PS?
and any other table or report where we can see the comparison & see the balance of planned cost value and budget value
thanks & regards,

Hi,
You mean to say in CJ40 not in CJ30.
Step 1: Go to PRPS Table and enter the WBSE and get the OBJNR no.
Step 2:Pass the OBJNR in RPSCO and you can get the planned cost value.Note WRTTP should be 1.
Muzamil

Table value for Planned Cost - Cj30

In verge of developing an report , I need the Table value from Which I could pick 'planned cost" available in CJ30 against the project number .
Could anyone throw some lights on that ??
Regards
Muralidharan.S

Hi,
You mean to say in CJ40 not in CJ30.
Step 1: Go to PRPS Table and enter the WBSE and get the OBJNR no.
Step 2:Pass the OBJNR in RPSCO and you can get the planned cost value.Note WRTTP should be 1.
Muzamil

Analyse cost component split for planned costs:total/level/lower

Hi!
when I am executing the CK13N, I am able to get total cost , this level cost, lower level cost for each cost componenet and same thing from report CK80_99.
But My client is asking a report to know the level cost for header material in process order with actual production quantity.
So, I need to know, what are the tables, where i can see total, this level, lower costs each cost component structure wise.
I have checked KEKO & KEPTH, but not able to get this level cost directly.
can any one give tables regarding this.
regs,
ramesh

Hi
Its not possilnbe... In Prod order, you issue material at say iits Std cost.. This will be issued at one single value.... You dont get breakup of the SFG material in the FG Production order
br, Ajay M

Exchange rate type for planning cost

Hy all,
our release is 4.7 .
Is it possible to change now the exchange rate type from M to P for costing and fix a budget figure valid for the whole year to evaluate standard cost?
Thanks in advance
Vir

Dear Vir,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a8/352537b1d21763e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
You can define the exchange rate for a currency pair using either direct or indirect quotation.
Indirect exchange rates are always given with the local currency or reference currency as the to-currency.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

COPA-Assessment cycle KEU5

We have run cost center -assessment cycle for a cost center group and all the cost of the profit centers are distributed to respective costcenters.And now we goto COPA-Assessment cycle KEU5 and run the cycle for the cycle with same cost center group as sender.
System posts a difference amount of positive amount in the credit side of each costcenter of that group.Which reduces the credit value and shows in over/under absorption.
Please suggest where from the system is finding the difference when all the costcenters are with zero value as cost is distributed thru CCA assessment cycle.What differences will a cycle run in co-pa determine.Please suggest.

Hi,
Actually, the Sales overhead and Corporate expenses which are captured in the Cost Center shall be allocated to the COPA. All other expenses captured in other Cost Centers shall be allocated to the Production and shall be absorped into the products manufactured. Hence, the same Cost Center shall not be used as sender in both the cycles. If we use like what you described, it will definitely result in over absorption that is more credits. Hence, please describe why need to add the same Cost Center group in both the CC cycle and Copa CC cycle.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

COPA Assessment Cycle using KEU5 for multiple controlling areas

Hello All,
There is an organization with operations in several countries. There is a separate controlling area for each country. There is one controlling area, for instance, for Germany and another for Netherlands.
A problem is encountered while executing transaction KEU5 for multiple controlling areas in parallel. For instance, when one user from Germany executes KEU5 for an assessment cycle for Germany controlling area and at the same time another user from Netherlands tries to execute KEU5 for a cycle for NL controlling area, the user from Netherlands encounters an error message u201C'Cycle XXXX 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Apparently SAP allows assessment cycles for exactly one controlling area to be executed together. This poses a problem since the organization plans to implement SAP in several other countries (There will be one separate controlling area for each country as per the organization structure adopted by the company).
Any ideas, views or suggestions on the aforesaid issue would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Soumya

Hi Soumya,
Did you find any text in SAP Documentation saying that "SAP does not allow cycles belonging to different controlling areas to be executed at the same time"...?
Pls find the following text from SAP Help...
Parallel Processing of Cycles of an Allocation Type
Use
Parallel processing of cycles results in considerable time savings. To process cycles of one allocation type in parallel, they must be assigned to different cycle run groups.
You define the cycle run groups in the cycle header data. You also assign cycles to the cycle run groups in the header data.
To process the cycles of a cycle run group in parallel, start the cycles one after the other, if required, in different sessions.
You are carrying out a cross-company code cost accounting and want to perform the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel. Create a cycle run group for each company code and assign the appropriate cycles to these groups. You can then carry out the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel.
When you execute a cycle, you can start a consistency check. The system checks whether you are allowed to execute the selected cycles in parallel.
Though I didn't come across such requirement, I feel, my earlier suggestion will work out...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Assessment Cycle for Planned Cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for