ATP check in a Quotation

Hi !!
Is it possible to configure SAP to perform a ATP in a Quotation... and have the Quotation actually reserve stock?
We are trying to see if we could use Quotations to reserve stock for a specific customer in the anticipation of a firm order from that customer.
Thanks,
Anisha.

Hi,
Standard SAP is not supporting to Availability Check on the Quotation.
Its just an quoted price for some material which can be available on request.
So the order also not a definite order.
If SAP will do this then there is possibility that a customer who is not willing to buy can be a part of product allocation. while other side if a customer want to buy will not have stocks. this is loss of business.
Let me know if you are having any specific requirement
Regards,
Rajeev

Similar Messages

  • Not able to find ATP check button while editing items in Quotation(CRM 7.0)

    Hi,
    I am trying to edit the Packaged Quotation in CRM WEB UI. I need to do ATP check for the Items. But, I am not able to find any button for ATP check ( check Availability).
    Can you plese let me know where can I find this button ....
    Or
    Do we need to do any configuration for this?
    Thanks,
    Sandeep

    Hi,
    I am trying to create from WEB UI (CRM 7.0). But, still I am not able to see any button for ATP.
    Can you please tell me, where can we find this button....
    Do we need to do any configuration for this button to be displayed....or is there any condition for the button to be displayed?
    Please help me in this regard !!!!
    Thanks,
    Sandeep

  • ATP Check at the time of creation of Opportunity.

    Dear Friends,
    We have a business requirement in which we are supposed to perform the ATP check @opportunity level. When we are trying to assign the ATP Profile to the Item Category OPPT, the ATP profile is not available for opportunity. there is a FM "CRM_ITEM_TYPE_FIELDCHECK_CB" which is responsible for hiding the   ATP Profile field for opportunity "OPPT" Line Item.
    I have update the ATP Profile for opportunity in the Maintenance View "CRMV_ITEM_TYPE"
    I have implemented the 2 Badi's also CRM_ATP_EXTERN_BADI & CRM_ATP_EX_POST_BADI but none of the implementation is being getting called in case of opportunity.
    But when i am creating Quotation the above BADI's are being getting called.
    And moreover, the Availability Check for ATP in customization there is no RFC system maintained neither the Control Information.
    But I am confused, why in case of Quotation the BADI's are getting Triggered and why not in Case of Opportunity.
    Please Advise me on the above and if I am missing something or if there is any alternative for ATP at OPPT level.
    Your answer will be rewarded
    Thanks in Advance,
    Kind Regards,
    Ashraf.

    Hi Ashraf,
    The reason is that ATP is run only for transaction type of category SALES ( BUS2000115 ) but opportunity is a different category. The only possibility you have left over here is to enhance the Event framework in CRM through tcode CRMV_EVENT.
    Add these entries and see if it works, since there are a lot of checks so for beginning you can add these events in tcode CRMV_EVENT.
    ORDERADM_I
    AFTER_CHANGE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    K
    ORDERADM_I
    AFTER_CREATE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    K
    ORDERADM_I
    AFTER_DELETE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    A
    ORDERADM_I
    BEFORE_DELETE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_SOURCE_DELETE_ITM_CHECK_EC
    PRODUCT_I
    AFTER_CHANGE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    PRODUCT_I
    AFTER_CREATE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_CHANGE
    DLV_GROUP
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_CHANGE
    ORDER
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_CHANGE
    ORDER
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_KIT_SCHEDLIN_CHN_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_CREATE
    DLV_GROUP
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_CREATE
    ORDER
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN
    AFTER_DELETE
    ORDER
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    SCHEDLIN_I
    AFTER_CHANGE
    <*>
    CRM_ATP
    CRM_CONFIRM_ADD_ITEM_EC
    K
    /Hasan

  • ATP Check button is missing (CRM WEB UI 7.0) only for Package Quote

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a Package Quotation from CRM WEB UI 7.0. I need to do an ATP Check for the item. But, I am not able to fiind ATP check button in the screen.
    Can you please tell me where this button will b available?
    And Do we need to do any cofiguration..to let this Button get displayed?
    Thanks,
    Sandeep
    Edited by: Sandeep Reddy on Jun 6, 2010 7:38 PM

    Hi Sidd,
        Our company has been running ISA B2B for many years.   Now that we upgraded to 7.0 we are creating business roles for internal users.
    In IMG transaction > CRMC_UI_PROFILE for role SALESPRO it can launch logical link id ISA-RTPCAT = Product Catalog
    and we configured img "Activate Links from CRM Web Client UI to Web Channel Applications" for RPTCAT to point to our server host / XCM application / url = /catalog/cat/webClientEntry.do
    So when the sales pro launches the product catalog we aren't getting a window asking which shop or product catalog to select from.   I'm thinking I'm missing a step somewhere.
    Thanks,
    Glenn

  • ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

    Good morning,
    I have a question regarding the ATP.
    If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
    When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
    Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
    Thanks in advance.
    ATP novice :o)

    Hi Guy Hall,
    Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for  checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Re: ATP check at storage location level.

    Hi All,
    NEED urgent help.
    I want to know if it is posiible to have ATP check at storage location level only.
    I do not want this check to happen at plant level.
    Please reply.
    Thanks and regards,
    Nilesh

    Hi Shankar,
    Storage location is defaulted in sales order.
    Can you tell me if there is any user exit for ATP wherein I can carry out the ATP at storage location level and not at plant level.
    Thanks and regards,
    Nilesh

  • Re: ATP check at storage location level in sales order.

    Hi ,
    I have a requirement wherein storage location is determined in my sales order,  the ATP check is done at plant level as well as storage location level , and the smaller of the two quantities is taken as the result of the ATP check.
    My requirement is that the ATP check should only be performed at storage location level .
    Please suggest if there is any standard setting available in SAP.
    iF NO , PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE USER EXIT, WHERE I can add my requirement.
    Regards,
    Nilesh

    Hi Nilesh,
    in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
    I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
    I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Relationship about ATP check and credit check

    Dear all,
              At present,  we have credit control in sales  order. The rule is : once the sales order's amount over 1 dollar, the order will be blocked for credit check. This order has to release credit block manually in VKM4.
              Here has a problem, when a sales order has credit released with the status "D",  if i check ATP for one item in this order, the credit status will return to "B", it is not match our requirement.
              How can the credit status not change when ATP check happen in the sales order?
             Thanks in advance!

    Hi Irene,
    You can copy this requirement with new code like :
    IF yvbuk-cmgst = 'D'.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
          MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-STATIC_LIMIT.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DOCUMENTVALUE.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-REVIEWDATE.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OPEN_ITEMS.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OLDEST_OP.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DUNNING_LEVEL.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER1.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER2.
          MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER3.
        EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    If you are a problem with yvbuk-cmgst, you can use user exit MV45AFZZ to save the credit status (cmgst) into an other field.
    This new field is checked in the new requirement.
    This requirement deactivates the credit check if the credit status is released. In this case, no credit check is possible in SO.
    Regards,
    Lionel

  • Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote ATP check but the comm

    hi , all guys :
    when I create the pp-pi order , first i use the batch determination to allocate the component
    batch , then i do the ATP check , but the committed quantity always is zero ,the ATP alway does
    not support confirm quantity (co09 the confirm quantity always is zero),so when i create the other pp-pi order the stock quantity always cover the reqirements quantity of components
    in the mater data , i use the ATP group is 02 (the customizing is standard) i think the ATP scope is irrelative to this issue .
    in the order type control parameters , i use the ATP check
    for example :
    the componet 100-200 have three batchs :
    batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
    batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
    batch: 20100601 quantity 40 kg
    now , the requirment of component 100-200 is 100 kg
    the batch determination conditions is self expiration .
    so i throght the batch determination and batch split to allocate the bacth and quantity is
    batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
    batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
    batch: 20100601 quantity 30 kg
    after allocating , i run the ATP check ,BUT the COMMITED QUANTITY ALWAYS IS ZERO .
    I don't know why !!! ,where can configure the ATP confirm quantities (committed quantities) the in the customizing
    can you give help me!!!
    thanks!!!
    best regards

    Davis:
    Check in MRP Group settings, Availability Check session, flag activate full confirmation logic. Test activate full confirmation logic.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • ATP check active when creating sales order - want to deactivate

    Hello experts,
    at the time we created a sales order, the checking group for availability check in the master data of an article was "02" (Individual requirements). However, this was a master data error, as the correct setting for this article is "KP" (No check). We have changed this setting in the article master, but now we have a problem with the delivery, as we can not confirm the required quantity in the desired date. The ATP check says we have no availability (based on the wrong master data existing during the creation of the order), but we need to override this check.
    Is ther any way of "overriding" the ATP check of the article in our sales order, thus taking into account the "KP" (no check) setting?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Kind regards.
    Marcos

    Have you actually created the delivery yet? If not, you can use the following path to deactivate the ATP check during delivery:
    > SPRO
      > Logistics Execution
        > Availability Check & Transfer of Requirements
          > Availability Check
            > Determine procedure for Each Delivery Item Category
    Perhaps turning of the ATP check temporarily shall help overcome the issue.

  • ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

    Hi All,
    While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
    But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
    I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
    Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
    Thanks &Regards,
    Navaneeth

    Hi All,
    Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
    Regards,
    Navaneeth

  • ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

    Hi Friends,
    Pl.help in this.
    1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
    Regards,
    Mani

    Hi Mani ,
    Are you  taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
    ex- For soft  drinks or beverages industry  it pretty common , they  use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want  use return sales order for this?
    Note- Just plz explain  scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
    Hope it is helpful to you,
    Regards
    Venkat

  • SD- Sales Order - ATP check not working for few item in same sales order

    Hi Experts,
    Need help we activated ATP check but for few item i could not find confirmation qty after availability check. In same SO out of 4 items for schedule line it confirming qty for 2 item but  it's not confirming for remaining 2 items though stock is available. Please guide me how to correst and what need to check.
    Manoj

    Dear Manoj,
               As you know, ATP is a big subject & some times its difficult to point the exact problem.
    In your case, I suggest you to execute the function module:BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY using Tx:SE37
    key in selection criteria , in results check the "ATPQTY"- it will show you how much actual stock is available for use i.e. ATP qtty.
    still if you find the availability & system not confirming the qtty, then problem could be in checking rule
    Tx:OVZ9 check in relevant combination, whether you are considering RLT or not?
    is this case with MTS or MTO
    because in Sales order -
    for MTS - checking rule "A" & MTO checking rule will be "AE"
    Regards,
    Reazuddin MD

  • Questions on ATP Check, RLT & Planning

    Hi,
    I have a couple of issues regarding ATP checks and Planning, and I was wondering if anyone could help.
    1. We have a setup right now where we are using standard SAP availability check with Replenishment Lead time. In the Purchasing, we might have scenarios where some Purchase orders are indefintely delayed from the Vendors and this has to be reflected in the sales order.
    We tried doing that by setting the delivery date in the PO to 31.12.9999 but since the date lies outside of the RLT, the sales order is fully confirmed and the delay in purchasing is not reflected in the sales order. Do you have any suggestions on how we could get around this without deactivating RLT?
    2. We have a requirement right now of using the Planned delivery time in the Material master as working days instead of Calendar days for planning purposes. Any proposal on how that can be done?
    3. We also have a requirement of taking the 'ordering calendar' into account for planning as well as for availability check - the ordering calendar is basically a weekly schedule when the POs are created and sent out to the Vendor. As an example we have a material with Planned delivery time as 3 days and GR Processing time as 1 day. However, we send the PO to this Vendor only on every Thursday.
    When the sales order is placed on Friday, using RLT the Sales order will be confirmed for Tuesday next week, but the PO will not even be sent to the Vendor till Thursday next week and we end up giving incorrect confirmations to the customers. Is there any way that this 'ordering calendar' could be taken into account in the Availability check.
    Hope someone can help.

    Hi arnab
      one way of achieving your requirements is
    after creating the sales order you can execute the SALEs order MRP using MD50 transaction enter the order # and MRP control parameters 1,3,1,2. and execute.
    Ensure the following before MRP.
    1. All the master data are maintained for the schedule line creation for the components ( Source list, Scheduling agreements)
    2. Material master with valid MRP data.strategy group having MTO strategy.
    after sales order MRP you will get the schedule line created for the components
    also MRp will create the cpacity requirements as we run the MRP with Lead time scheduling.
    Hope this helps
    SK
    Reward your points

  • ATP check for inbound EDI order

    Hi Friends,
    When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
    But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
    ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
    PLease let me know as soon as possible.
    Many thanks in advance
    Br, Prashant

    HI Frndz,
    problem is solved by using following customizing settings
    Customizing:
    SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
    Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Couldn't complete your request because of a an program error

    HI ! I have been chatting with the support team since this morning and still can't find the solution. I updated my photoshop cc , I even did and uninsalled/reinstalled following their advice and keep getting the above error when using photoshopcc esp

  • How to create an ods after creating info objects?

    Hi, Please Explain me How to create an ods after creating info objects with all screenshots in BW 7.0? Thanks, Jini

  • Good way to trigger exit event for VI's loaded in subpanels?

    Sorry if this is a novice question, but I haven't gotten much traction searching for an answer the last couple days. I have a setup that uses remote panels for an interactive "lab."  The panel loads a reentrant VI that is just a tab control, the fron

  • Daily email using jsp

    Daily Morning i want to sent an email with data from database.Is it possible to do with jsp?

  • Admin server doesnt start...

    I am getting the following exception, please help. I have tried putting the user name and password in boot.properties file but it didnt help me. ####<May 26, 2011 7:56:14 AM CEST> <Critical> <WebLogicServer> <tna-06-7437> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS K