ATP check inconsistency

I have found that when I configure the a check at creation and release and I want the check at release to consider only Available Qty and not purchase orders even when I do not tick Incl Purchase orders it will still allow me to release my production order.
I then ticked the do no consider the RLT and then I got my message of missing part as it was doing as I wanted not considering Purchase Orders?
Why would this have been the case u2013 even if I had unticked RLT it should of said no material available?
Can someone explain how the logic works please?

Hi,
Check if that component requirement date lies outside of the RLT period, in that case system assumes this iwll be available automatically as RLT is less thatn period between today and requirement date so system assumes you can order the compoenent and get the delivery within requirmeent date.
Check and Revert,
Santosh sarda

Similar Messages

Block the ATP Stock for non-ATP checked items in BOP

Hello GATP Experts,
We have a strange and interesting scenario here with STOs. Let me explain step by step
1) We don't do ATP check for STOs and hence a Z-check mode has been designed and it will be considered for STO documents
2) Now, let us consider a situation where I have a stock of 100 CS for Material M1 at Plant P1.
3) Let's say, a STO document gets created at 09:00AM in the morning with requested quantity 50 and as it doesn't do ATP check this will be fully confirmed
and consumes 50CS of the stock.
4) So, the net cumulative quantity that is available is 50CS.
5) At 11:00AM,let us say; there is a sales order that was created for a quantity of 100 CS. As the sales document does the ATP check it consumes the only available 50 CS and gets saved with partial confirmaiton situation.
Now, at 12:00 PM - We are running the BOP. When we run the BOP ; what standard SAP does is STO document (as per our business scenario, STOs has higheest priority and they fall on top of the list) gets skipped due to non-ATP check mode and full stock is allocated to the sales order which makes no sense to us which leads to over confirmation situation.
We thought of exluding the STOs from BOP ; however - we end up in not re-scheduling the STO documents which would result in requiring a separate BOP to be run for the STO documents.
FYI - We have contacted SAP and they have confirmed that the above mentioned behavior of the BOP is as designed and it cannot be changed.
Is there any alternative solution for this ? Appreciate your valuable ideas.
Thanks
Babu Kilari

You might have already considered this. pardon if this sounds dumb.
see if you can pass STO's as a receipt in the scope of check for STO's. I presume it is requirement element in your case for ATP checking rule for STO's. Don't include these STO's in sales order checking rules.
This may result in inconsistent ATP logic though. Alternately try creating a Z category for STO and call it a receipt. include this also in the scope of check for STO's.
Try running BOP and see what happens. BOP on its own is not a gurantee that a requirement is always confirmed over another, whatever be the sorting criteria. If there isnt enough stuff, the system has its own internal logic of sorting too which probably treats priority by time of creation of the requirement.
Publish if you meet any success. These ideas are just based on my fancies
Guru

ATP Check with STOs

Hi All
Need your help to resolve the following concern in committed date of STOs
Scenario:
When a STO is created for a material where the supplying plant has no stock, then the committed date in the delivery schedule lines comes up as 31.12.9999 and the statistical date comes up as the requested delivery date + planned delivery time!
I guess this is fine as system considers forward scheduling automatically in this case.
However this order is not considered by BOP as well!
Now if the stock is produced / made available even then the STO is not getting picked up in BOP
So this results in inconsistency (APO/R3) and also when the delivery is generated it comes up with error! (wrong quantity / date or '0' qty)
Now if I manually do the ATP check in the STO line item, it changes the dates. Still it dosent show up in BOP but delivery can be created!
Can you guys please advice me what should be the process for such STOs (which were created when there was no stock in supplying plant). As manually doing ATP check isnt sensible.
Also why is that BOP is not picking up these STOs (I have already checked the parameters and STO is included)
Thanks in advance
RK

RK,
"Crazy" is a misnomer when dealing with software. The only things in this business that are crazy are the clients. Unfortunately, they also pay the bills, so you have to live with such insanity.
According to your error message, you haven't defined 050 / U. I don't know the entire scenario, but to me this is a red flag that must be addressed regardless of any other steps you take. You must either create these check instructions, or eliminate objects that are calling for this combination.
I just reviewed my posts, and I don't see any place there where I said I did not create 'U'. I did say I removed my original BE, which wasn't 'U'. My original BE for STOs and STPrqs was 'ST'. I removed this from both R/3 and SCM. Then I created 'U' in R/3 and 'U' in SCM.
1. R/3: SM30 > view V_441R Create 'U' Checking Rule.
2. R/3: SM30 > view V_441V Create Availability check as necessary using 'U' Check rule and the Availability checks you will be using.
3. R/3: SM30 > view V_161V doc category B remove your existing check rule and replace with 'U'
4. R/3: SM30 > view V_161V doc category F Remove your existing check rule and replace with 'U'.
5. SCM SM30 > View /SAPAPO/V_ATP02 > Create BE 'U'
6. SCM SM30 > View /SAPAPO/V_ATP07 > Remove the existing check instructions for STOs. Create new check instructions as necessary for STOs, using BE 'U'.
7. SCM SM34 > Dialogue /SAPAPO/ATPC04_05 > Remove the existing Check control(s) for STOs. Add the appropriate Check control items using BE 'U'.
I don't really know if the 'U' issue is related to your original problem. I am only responding to the part of your post where you said
I am getting error:
Check instruction / U does not exist for location product XXXX / XXXX
FYI throughout this post, I have been assuming that you have no userexits/BADIs activated, on either side (R/3 nor SCM) nor are you using RBA. Either of these events would mean additional troubleshooting steps would be required.
Best Regards,
DB49

Sales order unknown in ATP check

Hi,
We are using Global ATP in SAP APO 7.0 EHP2 with SAP ECC 6.0. When we run the ATP check for a material we get entries with confirmed quantities referring to sales order number <unknown>. We can also see these confirmed quantities against unknown order numbers in TA /SAPAPO/RRP3, in the "ATP" tab. These entries do not appear in the "Elements" tab. When entering GT_IO in the transaction code window we can see the internal order numbers for the <unknown> orders. But we are not able to delete these orders anyhow. I have tried the following reports/transactions:
- Report /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 (APO) (no inconsistencies)
- Report SDRQCR21 (ECC) (no inconsistencies)
- TA /SAPAPO/CCR (no inconsistencies found)
- Report /SAPAPO/OM_DELETE_INCON_ORDERS (message "Order does not exist, no action executed")
- TA /SAPAPO/AC06 (no TQAs found for the material)
- TA /SAPAPO/OM16
Anyone experienced a similar situation, and was able to remove the inconsistent entries?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Geir Kronkvist

Thanks again!
Using Selection via product number, category = 'BM', I get the message
/SAPAPO/OE 015
No orders could be determined for the selection
Since there is no OLTP order number, I cannot use selection via document number.
Kind regards,
Geir

ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

Good morning,
I have a question regarding the ATP.
If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
Thanks in advance.
ATP novice :o)

Hi Guy Hall,
Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
Regards
Pradeep

Re: ATP check at storage location level.

Hi All,
NEED urgent help.
I want to know if it is posiible to have ATP check at storage location level only.
I do not want this check to happen at plant level.
Please reply.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Hi Shankar,
Storage location is defaulted in sales order.
Can you tell me if there is any user exit for ATP wherein I can carry out the ATP at storage location level and not at plant level.
Thanks and regards,
Nilesh

Re: ATP check at storage location level in sales order.

Hi ,
I have a requirement wherein storage location is determined in my sales order, the ATP check is done at plant level as well as storage location level , and the smaller of the two quantities is taken as the result of the ATP check.
My requirement is that the ATP check should only be performed at storage location level .
Please suggest if there is any standard setting available in SAP.
iF NO , PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE USER EXIT, WHERE I can add my requirement.
Regards,
Nilesh

Hi Nilesh,
in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
Regards,
Markus

Relationship about ATP check and credit check

Dear all,
          At present, we have credit control in sales order. The rule is : once the sales order's amount over 1 dollar, the order will be blocked for credit check. This order has to release credit block manually in VKM4.
          Here has a problem, when a sales order has credit released with the status "D", if i check ATP for one item in this order, the credit status will return to "B", it is not match our requirement.
          How can the credit status not change when ATP check happen in the sales order?
         Thanks in advance!

Hi Irene,
You can copy this requirement with new code like :
IF yvbuk-cmgst = 'D'.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER3.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
If you are a problem with yvbuk-cmgst, you can use user exit MV45AFZZ to save the credit status (cmgst) into an other field.
This new field is checked in the new requirement.
This requirement deactivates the credit check if the credit status is released. In this case, no credit check is possible in SO.
Regards,
Lionel

Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote ATP check but the comm

hi , all guys :
when I create the pp-pi order , first i use the batch determination to allocate the component
batch , then i do the ATP check , but the committed quantity always is zero ,the ATP alway does
not support confirm quantity (co09 the confirm quantity always is zero),so when i create the other pp-pi order the stock quantity always cover the reqirements quantity of components
in the mater data , i use the ATP group is 02 (the customizing is standard) i think the ATP scope is irrelative to this issue .
in the order type control parameters , i use the ATP check
for example :
the componet 100-200 have three batchs :
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 40 kg
now , the requirment of component 100-200 is 100 kg
the batch determination conditions is self expiration .
so i throght the batch determination and batch split to allocate the bacth and quantity is
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 30 kg
after allocating , i run the ATP check ,BUT the COMMITED QUANTITY ALWAYS IS ZERO .
I don't know why !!! ,where can configure the ATP confirm quantities (committed quantities) the in the customizing
can you give help me!!!
thanks!!!
best regards

Davis:
Check in MRP Group settings, Availability Check session, flag activate full confirmation logic. Test activate full confirmation logic.
Regards,
Ricardo

ATP check active when creating sales order - want to deactivate

Hello experts,
at the time we created a sales order, the checking group for availability check in the master data of an article was "02" (Individual requirements). However, this was a master data error, as the correct setting for this article is "KP" (No check). We have changed this setting in the article master, but now we have a problem with the delivery, as we can not confirm the required quantity in the desired date. The ATP check says we have no availability (based on the wrong master data existing during the creation of the order), but we need to override this check.
Is ther any way of "overriding" the ATP check of the article in our sales order, thus taking into account the "KP" (no check) setting?
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards.
Marcos

Have you actually created the delivery yet? If not, you can use the following path to deactivate the ATP check during delivery:
> SPRO
> Logistics Execution
    > Availability Check & Transfer of Requirements
      > Availability Check
        > Determine procedure for Each Delivery Item Category
Perhaps turning of the ATP check temporarily shall help overcome the issue.

ATP check in the Sale order Processing and CO06 transaction (Confirm Qty)

Hi All,
While creating the Sale order, After performing the ATP check and saving the document i have called an user exit to make the confirmed Quantity equal to ZERO when the delivery block is set (As requested by customer). That is working fine...
But the same confirmed Quantity of ZERO is not reflecting in CO06 transaction. Its showing the old value that the value before setting the delivery block.
I have identified the table VBBE-VMENG which stores the confirmed quantity in CO06 transaction...
Could you please help me know any USER EXITS or any other solution to change the confirmed quantity to ZERO in CO06 transaction also while delivery block is set in the sale order.
Thanks &Regards,
Navaneeth

Hi All,
Please help me by providing some clues on this issue...
Regards,
Navaneeth

ATP Check against customer stock for return Sale order

Hi Friends,
Pl.help in this.
1. Is it possible to configure ATP check against Customer stock in a Sale order/Return order/any other way? ( Actuallly, client wants to take back empty cylinders through return sale order by ATP check against the customer stock)
Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani ,
Are you taking cylinder as returable packing item or not?
ex- For soft drinks or beverages industry it pretty common , they use thel returnable package material type and more over why you want use return sales order for this?
Note- Just plz explain scenario to MM and PP People also as availability check with all combination
Hope it is helpful to you,
Regards
Venkat

SD- Sales Order - ATP check not working for few item in same sales order

Hi Experts,
Need help we activated ATP check but for few item i could not find confirmation qty after availability check. In same SO out of 4 items for schedule line it confirming qty for 2 item but it's not confirming for remaining 2 items though stock is available. Please guide me how to correst and what need to check.
Manoj

Dear Manoj,
As you know, ATP is a big subject & some times its difficult to point the exact problem.
In your case, I suggest you to execute the function module:BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY using Tx:SE37
key in selection criteria , in results check the "ATPQTY"- it will show you how much actual stock is available for use i.e. ATP qtty.
still if you find the availability & system not confirming the qtty, then problem could be in checking rule
Tx:OVZ9 check in relevant combination, whether you are considering RLT or not?
is this case with MTS or MTO
because in Sales order -
for MTS - checking rule "A" & MTO checking rule will be "AE"
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Questions on ATP Check, RLT & Planning

Hi,
I have a couple of issues regarding ATP checks and Planning, and I was wondering if anyone could help.
1. We have a setup right now where we are using standard SAP availability check with Replenishment Lead time. In the Purchasing, we might have scenarios where some Purchase orders are indefintely delayed from the Vendors and this has to be reflected in the sales order.
We tried doing that by setting the delivery date in the PO to 31.12.9999 but since the date lies outside of the RLT, the sales order is fully confirmed and the delay in purchasing is not reflected in the sales order. Do you have any suggestions on how we could get around this without deactivating RLT?
2. We have a requirement right now of using the Planned delivery time in the Material master as working days instead of Calendar days for planning purposes. Any proposal on how that can be done?
3. We also have a requirement of taking the 'ordering calendar' into account for planning as well as for availability check - the ordering calendar is basically a weekly schedule when the POs are created and sent out to the Vendor. As an example we have a material with Planned delivery time as 3 days and GR Processing time as 1 day. However, we send the PO to this Vendor only on every Thursday.
When the sales order is placed on Friday, using RLT the Sales order will be confirmed for Tuesday next week, but the PO will not even be sent to the Vendor till Thursday next week and we end up giving incorrect confirmations to the customers. Is there any way that this 'ordering calendar' could be taken into account in the Availability check.
Hope someone can help.

Hi arnab
one way of achieving your requirements is
after creating the sales order you can execute the SALEs order MRP using MD50 transaction enter the order # and MRP control parameters 1,3,1,2. and execute.
Ensure the following before MRP.
1. All the master data are maintained for the schedule line creation for the components ( Source list, Scheduling agreements)
2. Material master with valid MRP data.strategy group having MTO strategy.
after sales order MRP you will get the schedule line created for the components
also MRp will create the cpacity requirements as we run the MRP with Lead time scheduling.
Hope this helps
SK
Reward your points

ATP check for inbound EDI order

Hi Friends,
When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
PLease let me know as soon as possible.
Many thanks in advance
Br, Prashant

HI Frndz,
problem is solved by using following customizing settings
Customizing:
SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

ATP check inconsistency

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for