ATP Tree Structure is not getting created automatically after Sales Order is saved
In one one of our scenario, when we add material to Sales Order and save with Requirement Type(under Procurrement Tab of Sales Order) , in APO there is no planned order or only planned order which is dynamically pegged created because the ATP Tree in APO is not being converted. There is no pegging relevant item create(e.g. Planned Order). When we are checking the persistent ATP Trees in APO (/SAPAPO/ATREE_DSP - ATP-Trees) we can see that they are not converted automatically. They are still there. If we do it manually via transaction (/SAPAPO/RRP_ATP2PPDS - Conversion ATP Tree Structures -> Production Planning) it works. Afterwards the Planned Order is available and fixed pegged.
Why is APO not converting the ATP tree automatically ?
I also checked the scheduling horizon for conversion of the ATP Tree and it is correct: Is there any relation with Check Mode setting under ATP tab in Material Master?
Hi Prasad ,
This enables you to debug the ATP tree . If you have created an entry here with your user name then it will not let ATP tree get converted into PP/DS orders automatically .
It's very surprising because all seems fine . Just cross check all the settings once with below .
The conversion time depends on the following horizons and dates:
· PP/DS Horizon
· Scheduling horizon for the conversion of ATP tree structures
· Requirements dates in the ATP tree structure
PP/DS immediately converts the ATP tree structure when the sales order is saved
· If the earliest requirements date for components is within the scheduling horizon or
· If the latest requirements date for finished products is within the PP/DS horizon
If none of these conditions are fulfilled when saving the sales order, the system saves the ATP tree structure in SAP APO. In this case you can only convert the ATP tree structure online or in the background when one of the conditions given above is fulfilled. Here, there is an offset for the horizons with which you can achieve an earlier conversion.
You maintain the scheduling horizon for the conversion of ATP tree structures in Customizing for Production Planning and Detailed Scheduling under Maintain Global Parameters and Defaults. You maintain a location product specific PP/DS horizon in the location product master. If no location product specific PP/DS horizon exists, the system uses the PP/DS horizon from the planning version. You maintain these in Model and Planning Version Management.
Love Singh
Similar Messages
-
CESS and VAT not getting picked automatically in Sales Order and Quotation
Hi Experts,
Whenever we create quotation or sales order the Excise Duty, Cess and VAT/CST has to pickup automatically but it is not happening.Sold to party belongs to TN and Karnataka states are picking up properly but not other states.
Regards
Rajeshwari ShenoyCheck if Condition record are maintained, so that it is picked in Sales order. When it is working fine for TN & Karnataka, it is most likely that condition record is not maintained.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful -
Urgent !plant is not getting popluated automatically in sales order
Hello,
Plant is not getting poplulated at item level in sales order.
I have checked
1.CMir -->not maintained
2.CMR-->not delivery plant is mainatined
3. MMR ->delivery plant is maintained.
need your advice on this.
ThanksHi ,
Please maintained delivery plant in Customer master record for ship to party .
GOTO XD02 , SALES TAB - SHIPPING SCREEN
This will flow in sales order . -
Transport Request Not getting created automatically
Dear Sir,
We are facing a problem related to , Transport Request not getting created automatically during the SPRO change activities . We have to manually create the Transport Request and then changes need to be included in the request individually on the manual basis .
However earlier , we had no such problem and Transport Request were getting created perfactly .
We request you to kindly help us on this issue pl .
Rgds
Sonia AgarwalHi Sonia,
This is purely because of the client settings. Your client settings are in such a way that the cghanges are not getting captured. As mentioned by Naveed, check to see the client settings and change the settings if needed.
FYI: The SandBox clients will have the client settings as in ur system now.
Regards,
Varadharajan M -
Internal Order for AUC Asset not getting created Automatically
As per SAP Standard , when I create an AUC Internal Order (KO01), and save , AUC asset is gets created automatically ted via AS01 and stores the AUC Asset in Internal Order settlement rule.
However when tried with the client Im not able to create, AUC is not getting automatically created and stored in Int Order Settlement rule.
In config I have added investment profile to Ord Type and in OAOA ( AUC Asset class setting , Investment profile is also checked)
Kindly let me have your inputs to fix the issue
Advance Thanks
SanjaiHi,
In order to create AUC asset automatically by the system, you need to create an investment profile in OITA.
Then assign this investment profile in the Internal order master data created through KO01 in the Investments tab.
There is no option of assigning the Investment profile in the Order type.
And in OAOA that is Asset class, select the radio button investment measure.
You can default the Asset class of AUC in the investment profile or leave it blank so that same can be filled when system prompts for AUC creation.
You cant see the AUC asset in the settlement rule once Investment order is created, but only after settlement of the balances to the AUC u can see.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar -
Why SO Header not get closed automatically after all SO lines get closed?
Hi all :
Do you know the reason, why some SO Header still as Booked Status, even All the SO lines are already closed ?
If I see the Workflow status the SO Header is in Status = Deferred and Activity = Wait
And I can close it manually if I rewind the Activity in the Workflow, but I want to know why the SOs not get closed automatically.
Thank you in advance
Edited by: Daniel on Jan 18, 2011 8:41 AMHave you scheduled the concurrent request to use Workflow Background Processor to Process OEOH ? What is the frequency? Has it run after the lines got closed?
Also, check the value of the WAIT attribute in the OEOH workflow? By default, it is set to close headers at the end of month.
For more detail please see Note:141919.1 on Metalink.
Also refer to metalink document # 397364.1 which details how to change the WAIT attributes.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi -
CST is not getting picked up in sales order
Dear Experts,
We are following TAXINN procedure and we have maintained condition record for excise condition type - JEXP, JECS & JA1X and tax condition types - JIVC and JIVP. But in sales order, Excise condition types and Vat is getting picked automatically for local customer. But if I chose a CST customer CST is not getting picked automatically even though I have maintained condition record for the same. I have told my client to use alternative tax classification but my client doesnt want to follow this procedure.
Kindly let me know, how can I make the CST to be picked automatically in sales order.
Thanks & Regards,
Reji SDear Reji,
These may be the possible areas for the issue.
1.Check the ship to party Tax classification in the customer master>Sales area data>billing tab.
2.Check the Tax classification of the material master-->Sales org data view.
3.Check the region of the ship to party.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali. -
Transfer order not getting created automatically for a backflushed FERT
Hi,
I am having a strange problem. in my business process the WM system is set in such a way that the when a production order is confirmed automatic goods receipt for the FERT is done. which will automatically create a transfer requirement and convert the TR in to TO automatically and TO will be confirmed automatically.
the issue its not happening so.
when I confirm a production order its creating a TR instead of creating TR --> TO --> TO confirmation.
I tried doing manual goods receipt for the production ordeer and the process worked perfectly.
this process is not working for only one plant. and in another plant when i confirm a production order its creating a TR automatically and then tr is getting converted in to TO automatically and TO is getting confirmed automatically.
I checked all configuration and its all same for both plants.Maintain a storage location in your delivery.
-
TO not getting created Automatically for mvt 311
Hi,
I am facing issue while doing Stock transfer between 2 Sloc. TO is not automatically getting created once i do stock transfer in MB1B for mvt 311.
I checked Tcode OMKX,OMKY,OMKZ, in all of them "A" is maintained in Automatic TO field.
Kindly let me know if i have missed any configuration.
I want to create TO automatically once i do Stock transfer in MB1B.
Please help.
Regards
UtsavHello Utsav,
For WH managed sloc to non WH sloc transfer, use WM movement type 311
For Non WH managed sloc to WH managed sloc transfer, use WM movement type 312
Try following setting. I believe you have following two cases,
Case I
If you are moving the stock from warehouse managed sloc to non warehouse managed sloc do following
(1) OLML->INTERFACE-> LE-WM MTYPE.
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type 311, WM movement type 311, auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2) OLML->Activity--> Transfer -
>Define movement type
For WM movement type 311 setting ,
--Destination cat = 921,
--Set background processing Automatic TO indicator = A
(3) Do MB1B- movement type 311 --- and enter receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing storage location as non warehouse managed sloc.
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Case II'
If you have a situation of moving the stock from non-warehouse managed sloc to warehouse managed sloc then proceed as below.
(1) OLML----> Activity -
>Transfer
For WM movement type 312, ((if WM movement type 312 is not present then coped from 311)
Source cat.= 321
(ii) auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2) OLML ->Interface->Movement type --->LE-WM MTYPE
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type as 312, WM movement type as 312, Auto TR flag = X, Immediate TO flag = A
(3) Now do MB1B with 312 movement type
Add receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing sloc as non warehouse managed sloc
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Thanks,
Milind -
Capped zones not getting discovered automatically after global zone discovr
On solaris 10.
We have global zones with capped and uncapped zones.
Zones which are uncapped getting discovered under global zone.
But zones which are capped are not getting discovered.
As per all documents:http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27363_01/doc.121/e27511/ftr_zones_mgmt.htm
All the non-global zones in the selected global zone are automatically discovered
Edited by: vtadmin on Aug 25, 2012 9:46 PMThe most common reason this usually occurs is because the of the shared memory issue with the Sun MC database. Looks like this issue has been passed on to 4.0. Please try doing the following:
When installing a Server in a whole-root Zone, edit /etc/project to set the shared memory setting first.
Change the "default:3:::" entry to look like this:
default:3::::project.max-shm-memory=(privileged,1073741824,deny)
...where 1073741824 indicates a 1GB setting (you may tune it lower). For more details, go here:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-5418/6n7gk6ilo?a=view
Mostly this is a problem in whole root zones, but sometimes also applies to the global zones. -
Quation getting referenced automatically through Sales order material
Hi,
Quation should get referenced automatically through given Sales order material.Assume Quation is fixed for all materials entered in Sale sorder.
i tried using user_exit_move_field_to_vbap and user_exit_save_document_prepare.And updated XVBFA,XVBAP programatically.
Sales order and Quation(at item level) are getting referenced but quantity of qutaion is not getting reduced by the quantity consumed and MD04 does not reflect the same.
Can you please help with the pointers.
Thanks much,
Vishnu.Hi,
As per standard SAP the description is copied from the material master but the same can be edited while creating the sales order. Take the help of ABPER to debug it find out the error.
Regards -
MWST not getting determined in CRM Sales Order
Hi All,
I am working on a scenario where we are using MWST for tax calculations. I am able to get the tax calculations correctly in ECC but when I create a Sales Order in CRM, MWST is not getting determined.
I have maintained the following
1) Downloaded the ECC customizing into CRM
2) Downloaded the pricing procedure into CRM
3) Downloaded the pricing conditions into CRM
4) Downloaded the pricing condition tables into CRM
5) Maintained the tax classification for Business Partner
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
SandeepHi Sandeep,
did you try to use the price analysis in SAP GUI (set user parameter PRC_TRACE = X in SU3) to get further details what is missing for MWST determination? There could be multiple reasons for this issue.
Best Regards,
Michael -
Material Description is getting changed automatically in Sales Order
Hello All,
I am presenly facing the issue on Description change in sales order
When I create the order with Material Mat1234 having description "XYZXYZ" as in the order material number remains same but description is changed to say "ABCABC"
we have not maintained CMIR for the same
also the Material master description is proper.( maintained as XYZXYZ).
Pls help me in resolving the issue.
Regards,Hi,
As per standard SAP the description is copied from the material master but the same can be edited while creating the sales order. Take the help of ABPER to debug it find out the error.
Regards -
Right item category not getting copied while copying sales order
Hi,
We have a scenario where we are coping an existing order document and maintaining a new order document.
The problem is that when we are copying the existing order, we ll not get the same item categories in the copied order as available in the original order.
The Free of Cost item categories of the materials got changed to the normal item categories, which should not happen.
Let me know if any configuration changes made in system can fix this issue.
Cheers!!!
AjayHi,
This may be due to copycontrol between these two sales order. In copy controls, you are retriggering the item category determination.
When you define the copy control from SO to SO, select the item category and keep the source and target item category as same. (Same for schedule line category also). Once this is done, your problem will be solved. -
Tree Table icons not getting cleared even after applying the CSS
Hi,
I need to change the tree table expanded and collapsed and the lead node icon.
Leaf node icon is getting changed properly but the remaining two are appled improperly.
In the background the old default image is getting redered and on top of that the newly given image is shown.
These are .css statemets used for changing the icons.
af|treeTable::expanded-icon{content:url(/org/calwin/ui/superweb/image/yellowBlueMarker-minus_trans.gif);
background: none ;}
af|treeTable::collapsed-icon{content:url(/org/calwin/ui/superweb/image/yellowBlueMarker_trans_plus.gif);
background: none}
af|treeTable::leaf-icon{content:url(/org/calwin/ui/superweb/image/blueCircleMarker_trans.gif);
background: none}
Can someone suggest a solution for this.
Thanks,
Praveen.Hi Frank,
I tried including -tr-inhibit:all;
but it didn't work.
Here's my skin registration tag in trinidaad-skins.xml
<skin>
<id>customSkin.desktop</id>
<family>CustomSkin</family>
<extends>fusion.desktop</extends>
<render-kit-id>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.desktop</render-kit-id>
<style-sheet-name>org/calwin/ui/superweb/skin/css/customFusion.css</style-sheet-name>
</skin>
Can there be any other reason for not being applied properly.
The images mentioned in the css are properly rendered but in the background
default images are still coming.
Please suggest..
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an imac OSX 10.6.8 How do I upgrade the safari that came with my mac? Several websites say the browser is out of date.
-
Says my computer does not support video conferencing?
Just recently whenever i tried to do video chats it tells me my computer does not support video conferencing? How can i fix this?
-
Intuitive Drag and Drop interaction
Hi, i am working on a drag and drop interaction with a direct feed-back built in. there are 6 dragables and 6 drop sources, which are rectangle smart shapes. depending on the answer which is dragged, i want an x or a check to appear next to the smart
-
Aurora update repeating endlessly.
Same 8.0a2 update Aurora repeating endlessly. Automatic update has been applied several times and the Manual Update has even been downloaded applied once. I am still being asked to update Aurora with the same 8.0a2 update. Browser is currently showin
-
Broken phone, early upgrade
i currently have a smartphone, my NE2 is in August. My current phone has a cracked screen and is hardly working. In order to get a replacement through the insurance it is $100. I would rather try and upgrade early to get a completely different phone