Transfer order not getting created automatically for a backflushed FERT

Hi,
I am having a strange problem. in my business process the WM system is set in such a way that the when a production order is confirmed automatic goods receipt for the FERT is done. which will automatically create a transfer requirement and convert the TR in to TO automatically and TO will be confirmed automatically.
the issue its not happening so.
when I confirm a production order its creating a TR instead of creating TR --> TO --> TO confirmation.
I tried doing manual goods receipt for the production ordeer and the process worked perfectly.
this process is not working for only one plant. and in another plant when i confirm a production order its creating a TR automatically and then tr is getting converted in to TO automatically and TO is getting confirmed automatically.
I checked all configuration and its all same for both plants.

Maintain a storage location in your delivery.

Similar Messages

TO not getting created Automatically for mvt 311

Hi,
I am facing issue while doing Stock transfer between 2 Sloc. TO is not automatically getting created once i do stock transfer in MB1B for mvt 311.
I checked Tcode OMKX,OMKY,OMKZ, in all of them "A" is maintained in Automatic TO field.
Kindly let me know if i have missed any configuration.
I want to create TO automatically once i do Stock transfer in MB1B.
Please help.
Regards
Utsav

Hello Utsav,
For WH managed sloc to non WH sloc transfer, use WM movement type 311
For Non WH managed sloc to WH managed sloc transfer, use WM movement type 312
Try following setting. I believe you have following two cases,
Case I
If you are moving the stock from warehouse managed sloc to non warehouse managed sloc do following
(1)     OLML->INTERFACE-> LE-WM MTYPE.
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type 311, WM movement type 311, auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2)     OLML->Activity--> Transfer -
>Define movement type
For WM movement type 311 setting ,
--Destination cat = 921,
--Set background processing Automatic TO indicator = A
(3) Do MB1B- movement type 311 --- and enter receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing storage location as non warehouse managed sloc.
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Case II'
If you have a situation of moving the stock from non-warehouse managed sloc to warehouse managed sloc then proceed as below.
(1) OLML----> Activity -
>Transfer
For WM movement type 312, ((if WM movement type 312 is not present then coped from 311)
Source cat.= 321
(ii) auto TR flag = X, immediate TO = A
(2) OLML ->Interface->Movement type --->LE-WM MTYPE
Add following setting
Warehouse number, reference movement type as 312, WM movement type as 312, Auto TR flag = X, Immediate TO flag = A
(3)     Now do MB1B with 312 movement type
Add receiving sloc as warehouse managed sloc and issuing sloc as non warehouse managed sloc
With these setting system will create automatic TO from TR. You can then confirm the TO manually.
Thanks,
Milind

Transport Request Not getting created automatically

Dear Sir,
We are facing a problem related to , Transport Request not getting created automatically during the SPRO change activities . We have to manually create the Transport Request and then changes need to be included in the request individually on the manual basis .
However earlier , we had no such problem and Transport Request were getting created perfactly .
We request you to kindly help us on this issue pl .
Rgds
Sonia Agarwal

Hi Sonia,
This is purely because of the client settings. Your client settings are in such a way that the cghanges are not getting captured. As mentioned by Naveed, check to see the client settings and change the settings if needed.
FYI: The SandBox clients will have the client settings as in ur system now.
Regards,
Varadharajan M

Internal Order for AUC Asset not getting created Automatically

As per SAP Standard , when I create an AUC Internal Order (KO01), and save , AUC asset is gets created automatically ted via AS01 and stores the AUC Asset in Internal Order settlement rule.
However when tried with the client Im not able to create, AUC is not getting automatically created and stored in Int Order Settlement rule.
In config I have added investment profile to Ord Type and in OAOA ( AUC Asset class setting , Investment profile is also checked)
Kindly let me have your inputs to fix the issue
Advance Thanks
Sanjai

Hi,
In order to create AUC asset automatically by the system, you need to create an investment profile in OITA.
Then assign this investment profile in the Internal order master data created through KO01 in the Investments tab.
There is no option of assigning the Investment profile in the Order type.
And in OAOA that is Asset class, select the radio button investment measure.
You can default the Asset class of AUC in the investment profile or leave it blank so that same can be filled when system prompts for AUC creation.
You cant see the AUC asset in the settlement rule once Investment order is created, but only after settlement of the balances to the AUC u can see.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Output Message for Purchase order not being created Automatically

Hi all,
I created a Condition type for Purchase order in MN04 with key combination "Doc.Type/Purch.Org/Vendor". The problem arises when i delete this condition record. After deletion when i create purchase order in me21n for that condition type, the system gives an error.
Message no. 06261 - No message generated for output of purchasing document.
Is there anyway the purchase order message is created automatically again when its condition type has been deleted from MN04.
- Regards
Sahar Khalid

Before creating the entry in MN04 the message was being created automatically. I want the system to create the same output message as it was creating before the creation of the entry in MN04.

Transfer Requirement not getting created

Hi All,
My query as below;
Production order is created using KANBAN (Control Cycle/Supply Area is defined) using classic KANBAN.
WM is in place and all the setting related to TR/TO creation for WM movement type 103 is in place.
When i am trying to receive this Production after completion it is not creating the TR/TO, while as material document is getting generated and shows the stock directly in interim storage type 901 without creating TR and TO.
Further i checked there is indicator in Production order i.e "Kanban indicator" that gets checked automatically when Production order is created using KANBAN Processs and if i remove that indicator forcefully, TR and TO is getting created normally.
Please provide some inputs where can be the problem and how TR and TO can be created normally eventhough KANBAN indicator is checked in Production order and where i can found the setting related to "KANBAN INDICATOR".
Appreciate your help.

Hi Maddy
Thanks very much for your response.
1. When you use KANBAN, you define separate KANBAN storage location, which is different from WM-managed replenishment storage locations, and separate KANBAN interim storage area with storage bin.
Yes different storage location is defined which is not WM-managed in supply area.
As you said Control Cycle is defined, see if the interface is properly defined for both of these Sloc.
Where i can check whether interface is properly defined or not.
2. See if you have defined the KANBAN replenishment strategy with Control type Transfer Requirements from a Storage Location which is being controlled by WM in the Customizing for Production under KANBAN > Replenishment Strategies > Define Stock Transfer Strategies
Actually for a material two strategies are defined like;
1) In-house Production strategies-0003-
supply area is defined with storage location which is IM managed.
And when this order is completed and i am trying to receive this in WM SLOC (usally whatever SLOC we have defined in supply area it proposes that SLOC at the time of receipt but i am changing this manually to WM managed SLOC) using transaction MIGO, it is directly taking the stock to 901 interim storage type and in total the stock increases but the problem is when TR is not getting created i am not able to take this to the storage bin as per strategies defined.
2) Stock Transfer Strategies-This is working fine and in that TR/TO is working fine.
3. For TO to get created automatically by the system from the transfer requirement, see if an indicator Automatic TO creation in the replenishment strategy is set or not. Yes this is set for stock transfer strategies but i didn't find option to check the TO creation automatically for in-house production strategy
4. Also, check that you have set up a suitable replenishment movement type for KANBAN in the Customizing for Warehouse Management under Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types (i.e.standard is 350 for KANBAN replenishment)-Yes this is also defined correctly.
Appreciate your more inputs on this.

Sub Order not getting created

Hi All,
           i am debuggin a code which is creating SUB ORDER (iw36) through call transaction method.
The transaction is filling the superior oder ,but after OK CODE it doesnt navigate to the next screen, instead it shows a message log, without any messages.
In the debugging mode I could notice that it fails at the point where FM CO_ZF_ORDER_LOCK_MULTI is called in SAPLCOIH. The parameter 'NOT_LOCKED' is having 2 records, as a result of which the FM CM_F_ANALYSIS is getting called which displays the log.
Please guide me in understading why the sub order is not getting created.
Thanks,
Vasuki
Edited by: Vasuki S Patki on Jul 14, 2009 3:03 PM

Hi Gajesh,
1)                 The Work center does not exist , I checked it in IR02..
2)                 I created the sub order manually , but it works fine. There is no error when creating manually.. But whne it is called from the program it takes a wrong entry for Workcenter that does not exist. But when I change it to the existing Workcenter it proceeds further.
3) I want to know where in the program the KTEXT is being populated, as it is taking an entry that does not exist in the superior order, it is a new entry.
Thanks,
Vasuki

Sales order not getting created in background.

I am using user exit to write my code to create sales order of basic type ORDERS05 with function module idoc_input_orders, and process code ORDE with my own message type.
If I run the program in foreground message KUWEV-KUNNR is not an input field comes.
IF I press enter the sales order is getting created with staus 53..
But in background ERROR MESSAGE comes as:
Function module not allowed: IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
Please give suggestions.

Dear Sir,
Please check the FI Period is opened and FI account Number is opened.
Thanks and Regards
N.soma Sundaram

ATP Tree Structure is not getting created automatically after Sales Order is saved

In one one of our scenario, when we add material to Sales Order and save with Requirement Type(under Procurrement Tab of Sales Order) , in APO there is no planned order or only planned order which is dynamically pegged created because the ATP Tree in APO is not being converted. There is no pegging relevant item create(e.g. Planned Order). When we are checking the persistent ATP Trees in APO (/SAPAPO/ATREE_DSP - ATP-Trees) we can see that they are not converted automatically. They are still there. If we do it manually via transaction (/SAPAPO/RRP_ATP2PPDS - Conversion ATP Tree Structures -> Production Planning) it works. Afterwards the Planned Order is available and fixed pegged.
Why is APO not converting the ATP tree automatically ?
I also checked the scheduling horizon for conversion of the ATP Tree and it is correct: Is there any relation with Check Mode setting under ATP tab in Material Master?

Hi Prasad ,
This enables you to debug the ATP tree . If you have created an entry here with your user name then it will not let ATP tree get converted into PP/DS orders automatically .
It's very surprising because all seems fine . Just cross check all the settings once with below .
The conversion time depends on the following horizons and dates:
· PP/DS Horizon
· Scheduling horizon for the conversion of ATP tree structures
· Requirements dates in the ATP tree structure
PP/DS immediately converts the ATP tree structure when the sales order is saved
· If the earliest requirements date for components is within the scheduling horizon or
· If the latest requirements date for finished products is within the PP/DS horizon
If none of these conditions are fulfilled when saving the sales order, the system saves the ATP tree structure in SAP APO. In this case you can only convert the ATP tree structure online or in the background when one of the conditions given above is fulfilled. Here, there is an offset for the horizons with which you can achieve an earlier conversion.
You maintain the scheduling horizon for the conversion of ATP tree structures in Customizing for Production Planning and Detailed Scheduling under Maintain Global Parameters and Defaults. You maintain a location product specific PP/DS horizon in the location product master. If no location product specific PP/DS horizon exists, the system uses the PP/DS horizon from the planning version. You maintain these in Model and Planning Version Management.
Love Singh

Required attribute not getting created

Ok, here is a wierd one.
I have some custom ID management code (an SSO plug-in cert mapper and a WAR file I deploy to OC4J_SECURITY). The application provides a registration process that creates user entries and RADs for Oracle Forms app users. Everything works fine, except that I have found that my RAD creation does not get the orclresourceviewers attribute created automatically.
This has worked in my IM development farm. The attribute would be created automatically. It was difficult to figure out this was the reason my Forms App Server would fail with the following exception.
oracle.ldap.util.AccessDeniedException: General Error when performing search: getExtendedProperties [LDAP: error code 50 - Insufficient Access Rights]
I have gone through the motions of now preparing to query the OID Forms ID so that I can fill in this attribute in my RAD creation class. I still would like to know why this attribute is not getting created for me anymore.
Any ideas?
Oh and BTW, it did not help that orclresourceviewers is not documented anywhere I could find (not OID Admin and not Forms Deployment Guide)
regards,
tt

Hi Sandeep.
Yes, my application entities that I set up to manage a specific realm are used to create all RADs in a particular realm. As part of the setup for this I add these application entitites to the following three realms:
cn=OracleDASAdminGroup,cn=Groups,cn=OracleContext,dc=<realm_name>,dc=<abc>,dc=<com>
cn=RealmAdministrators,cn=Groups,cn=OracleContext,dc=<realm_name>,dc=<abc>,dc=<com>
cn=UserProxyPrivilege,cn=Groups,cn=OracleContext,dc=<realm_name>,dc=<abc>,dc=<com>
I add to these so that the app entity could create, modify, delete and proxy to any realm user. I had to create an ACI to allow my entities to search and see the Forms Server application entity entry in order to populate orclresourceviewers.
I just wish I new why orclresourceviewers does not get created automatically. Of course, if I create the RAD in DAS or using the Oracle DynamicResourceCreate option, it is added. It has added it in my own RAD creation code at one point and it stopped for some reason.
I had to add an LDAP search to my RAD creation code with the possibility of multiple Forms Server entries (Logical Application Group) just in case. Much ado for something that maybe should not have been necessary.
regards,
tt

Snapshots not getting generated automatically

Hi all,
I want to generate an ADDM report. For that, I am running the addmrpt.sql script in $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin
While running, i am being asked for the begin_snap ID and end_snap ID. The problem is I have only one snap_id. The snapshots are not getting generated automatically for every 1 hr, as they shd be. I have to manually create a snapshot and run the ADDM script. I know that the database has to be open for atleast next 1 hr for getting the snapshot. I have not closed my database for the whole day.
Now, I want to know what exactly I shd be looking at, or rather be doing to get my snapshots generate automatically.
Please help me in this regard.
Thanx in advance....
Regards,
ORA_SRI

Hmm, you probably want to ask questions about ADDM in the [Database General Forum|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=61]

Reservation not getting created from shopping cart for stores order.

Hi experts,
Reservation not getting created from shopping cart for stores order,process used is some custom BADI.Extended classic scenario is the procrss .
Please help me
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
please check below wiki:
Determination of the follow-on document type
Regards.
Laurent.

Restrict Product Allocation if Planned order is not getting created

Hello All,
We have a scenario that when ever a Sales Order is getting created, Product allocation assignment will be done automatically and planned orders will be created for that requirement in APO.
There are some cases where in because of wrong Variant Configuration, Planned orders wont be created. Our requirement is to delete the Product Allocation automatically or to stop the product allocation assignment if the planned orders are not created.
Do we have any standard setting for doing so or Kindly suggest me some BADI's which can be used for it.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Srinivas.D

Srinivas,
A rather odd requirement.
Have you tried in SCM APO 'Maintain check instructions' to perform the product check first, then allocation? I would think that if the product check failed, then allocation would not be consulted, and no allocation therefore assigned.
IMG > APO > GATP > General Settings > Maintain check instructions
Best Regards,
DB49

AUC Asset not getting created when Internal Order is created

Dear Experts,
While Creating the internal order ( Object Class - Investment Measure)
AuC (Asset Under Construction) not getting created automaticall . Note Investment profile is already there in the order.
Following steps below are configured -
1. Define the AuC Asset Class (with investment measure) - OAOA
2. Define the Asset Class u2013 for Main Asset - OAOA
3. Define Investment Profile - OITA
a. Assign the AuC Asset Class (Step-1) in the investment profile
4. Assign Investment Profile to Model Order - OITA
5. Define Order Type (Investment) - KOT2
a. Settlement Profile - OKO7
b. Maintain Allocation Structures - OKO6
Thanks
Sanjai

Hi Sreekanth,
What is the setting needed to create AUC Automatically when an Internal order is created ?
I have done all the setting, but still when I save Internal order neither AUC asset is getting created.
So I went to extras selected create AUC and it went to AS01, but when I came back (F3) from AS01 to Internal Order and save , Auc Asset is not getting captured in the settlement rule. I even tried to give manually the AUC Asset in the settlement rule, for which sys is not allowing in the settlement rule.
Any thoughts are highly appreciated
Advance Thanks
Sanjai

Invoice is not getting created in Order related billing

Dear all,
I am trying to do a Order related billing. After creating the order i am going to VF01 and selecting the billing type i have created and trying to create the invoice. I am getting the error "No billing documents were generated. See log" when i am checking the Log its showing now errors.
In case if my account determination procedure is wrong, system should allow me to create a Sales invoice and accounting document will not be generated. But in this case even the sales invoice is also not getting created.
Please suggest me if there are any configuration changes i need to do to overcome this problem.

Apart from the suggestion already given, also ensure that
the order is not showing in incomplete log
the order is not blocked for credit limit
You can also cross check in VF04 whether system is fetching that sale order. For information, once you execute VF04, by default, system will check only "Delivery related" check box. You have to manually select "Order related" check box.
G. Lakshmipathi

Transfer order not getting created automatically for a backflushed FERT

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for