Attach native thread to jvm takes much time

Hello everyone,
I attach a native thread to the jvm. It works but it takes about 10 seconds. I do not understand why and I would like to reduce this time to 1 or 2 seconds.
I use a native thread to get keyboard events (a hook) to capture a screen area (with Robot class).
Samples program :
Abstract class used by the thread :
class CATSrvThreadHandler
public:
CATSrvThreadHandler();
enum
enableCode = 1,
updateCode = 2,
disableCode = 3
virtual ~CATSrvThreadHandler();
virtual void doEnable() = 0;
virtual void doUpdate() = 0;
Herited class : class CATSrvScreenIndicator:public CATSrvThreadHandler
CATSrvScreenIndicator CATSrvScreenIndicator::extract(JNIEnv env, jobject object)
// Get field ID
jfieldID l_handlerId = env->GetFieldID(env->GetObjectClass(object), "_handler", "I");
// Get field
CATSrvScreenIndicator l_handler = (CATSrvScreenIndicator )env->GetIntField(object, l_handlerId);
return l_handler;
// This method is called by Java code to activate the thread
void CATSrvScreenIndicator::enable(JNIEnv *env)
g_DesktopIndicatorThread.MakeSureThreadIsUp(env);
// Takes too much time !!!! (about 5 seconds)
while(!PostThreadMessage(g_DesktopIndicatorThread, WM_DESKTOPINDICATOR, enableCode, (LPARAM)this))
Sleep(0);
The thread class :
CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::CATSrvScreenCaptureThread()
m_env = NULL;
m_thread = 0;
m_vm = NULL;
m_handlerCount = 0;
void CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::MakeSureThreadIsUp(JNIEnv *env)
if(!m_thread)
// --> Get VM
env->GetJavaVM(&m_vm);
// --> Start "native" thread
CreateThread(NULL, 0, ThreadProc, this, 0, &m_thread);
DWORD WINAPI CATSrvScreenCaptureThread::ThreadProc(LPVOID lpParameter)
CATSrvScreenCaptureThread l_this=(CATSrvScreenCaptureThread)lpParameter;
// --> Attach the thread to the VM, takes too much time !!!! (about 5 seconds)
l_this->m_vm->AttachCurrentThread((JNIEnv**)&l_this->m_env, NULL);
MSG msg;
while(GetMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0))
Thanks for any information !

It's ellapse time with no other application running
between this method call and tray icon appearing int
the taskbar.
Now I am not sure I understand the question.
To time how long a method call takes you must time the method - not just the code that the method runs in. And you need to use a timer and not just guess about it.

Similar Messages

  • Attach native thread to JVM

    Hi,
    I use JNI to extend my Java class with some Windows specific functions.
    In the native code I have to check the value of a variable from Java and for this I created a new native thread.
    The documentation says that "the JNI interface pointer is valid only in current thread", so one must attach the new thread to the JVM in order to get a new interface pointer. But for attaching a thread to the JVM you need the ORIGINAL JNI INTERFACE POINTER. On the other hand, the documentation says that you "must not pass the interface pointer from one thread to another". So, I don't understand how to do it?
    Here is a sample from my code:
    JNIEXPORT jint JNICALL
    Java_com_cts__TestJNI_startTask(JNIEnv *env, jobject obj, jstring name)
    //creating a global reference
    jobject globalObj = env->NewGlobalRef(obj);
    //create the new thread
    hThread = CreateThread(NULL,
    0,
    (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE) WaitForStop,
    (LPVOID) env,//=>>> it mustn't be passed!
    0,
    &tid);
    //the thread method, which check the value of "status" field from Java
    void WINAPI WaitForStop(LPARAM lparam)
    JavaVM *jvm;
    JNIEnv *jenv;
    pInitData->lparam->env->GetJavaVM(&jvm);
    jint res = jvm->AttachCurrentThread((void**) &jenv, NULL);
    if (res < 0) {
    return;
    jclass jclasjni = jenv->GetObjectClass(globalObj);
    jfieldID jfid = jenv->GetFieldID( jclasjni, "status", "I");
    jint jstatus = 0;
    do
         Sleep(1000);
         jstatus = jenv->GetIntField(globalObj, jfid);
    } while (jstatus == 0);
    jvm->DetachCurrentThread();
    Is it correct the way I attached the thread?
    Because I don't quite understand this JNI interface pointer issue.
    Thanks in advance

    Ahhh - ha - got it working.
    Here is how I did it:
    dynamically link to the GetCreatedJavaVMs() function in the jni library (hJVM is the result of an earlier call to LoadLibrary):
         // type definitions for function addresses returned by loading jvm.dll
         typedef jint (JNICALL GetCreatedJavaVMs_t)( JavaVM**, jsize, jsize* );
         // function definitions for functions used in jvm.dll
         GetCreatedJavaVMs_t *GetCreatedJavaVMs;
         GetCreatedJavaVMs = (GetCreatedJavaVMs_t*)GetProcAddress( hJVM, "JNI_GetCreatedJavaVMs" );
         return GetCreatedJavaVMs( jvm, bufLen, nVMs);Get an appropriate instance on the JVM by called GetCreatedJavaVMs and pulling the first one. Once we have that, call AttachCurrentThread to get a JNIEnv pointer that we can use for doing work:
         JavaVM *jvm;
         JNIEnv *jenv;
         jint nSize = 1;
         jint nVms;
         jint nStatus = JAVAVM.GetCreatedJavaVMs( &jvm, nSize, &nVms );
         jint res = jvm->AttachCurrentThread((void**) &jenv, NULL);
        jclassStartup =
           jenv->FindClass(sStartupClass); // do some workWhen all done with the invocation, detach the jenv pointer from the current thread:
         jvm->DetachCurrentThread();Works like a charm.
    - K

  • Primavera Contract managment take much time when open large PDF files.

    Dears,
    i have a big problem!
    i made integration between the PCM and sharepoint 2010 and make migration from the file system to sharepoint.
    the sharepoint database reach 355GB
    after that unfortunately, when i try to open large pdf attachment through PCM(Primavera Contract Managmnet) it take much time then whan was opened from the file server.
    i made everthing upgrde the RAM and processor but the problem still exists.
    please help!
    Edited by: 948060 on Sep 19, 2012 1:48 AM

    we start store attachment on 2007. all of these files are migrated to sharepoint 2010 now on the staging enviroment.
    but, we faced the performance issue as mentioned above.
    the large files (begin 5MB) take a lot of time to open through the PCM

  • Takes much time

    hi all
    When i tries to retrive the data from outline using OLAP outline extractor it takes much time and less data
    i dont know whats the reason and where as in razzza i get in fraction of sec but its not format which ima looking for
    help appreciated
    regards

    You may need to make some registry settings, have a look at this post and there is a link to Tim's blog - Re: Extracting large dimension using outline extractor
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Query takes much time while sum of yearly bases amount

    I have made query on the basis of joing to get payroll data it's woking fine but when we accumulate this on yearly basis while giving parameter from and to date then it takes much time, so how can we optimise this.
    please advice.

    this is query
    SELECT paa.assignment_id,MAX(EFFECTIVE_DATE) effective_date,
    paypa.business_group_id,paypa.payroll_id,
    nvl(SUM(decode(pet.element_type_id,10,decode(pivf.name,'Pay Value',TO_NUMBER(NVL(prrv.result_value, 0))))),0) AMOUNT
    FROM pay_assignment_actions paa,
    pay_payroll_actions paypa,
    pay_run_results prr,
    pay_element_types_f pet,
    pay_element_classifications pec,
    pay_run_result_values prrv,
    pay_input_values_f pivf
    where paypa.payroll_ACTION_id = paa.payroll_ACTION_id
    AND prr.assignment_ACTION_id = paa.assignment_ACTION_id
    AND paypa.action_status = 'C'
    AND paa.action_status = 'C'
    and paypa.action_type in ('Q','R')
    AND pet.element_type_id = prr.element_type_id
    AND pec.classification_id = pet.classification_id
    AND pivf.input_value_id=prrv.input_value_id
    AND prr.run_result_id = prrv.run_result_id
    AND pivf.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
    AND paypa.effective_date BETWEEN pivf.effective_start_date AND pivf.effective_end_date
    AND paypa.effective_date BETWEEN pet.effective_start_date AND pet.effective_end_date
    AND paypa.effective_date between to_date('01-JUL-2010') AND TO_DATE('30-JUN-2011')
    group by paa.assignment_id,paypa.business_group_id,paypa.payroll_id
    any idea for this ,how can we improve performance,althoug it's woking fine without using group by function
    Edited by: oracle0282 on Mar 31, 2011 11:36 PM

  • MacBook Pro takes much time for Shutdown (More than 1 min.)

    I have a MacBook Pro, and some weeks ago, it takes much time for shutdown.
    I've tried to install the 10.5.2 update, but nothing solves.
    My mac takes for shutdown 1 min & 30 seconds every time. I don't understand. Why?
    What can I do? I tried to repair permissions and reset the PMU, but the problem still there.
    Help me! Please!
    Thanks
    Sorry, but I'm spanish and it's possible that I've made more mistakes writing in English.

    Thanks. I tried to dissable an EyeTv option, then EyeConnect don't appears in the Activity Monitor. This is the result:
    Now, my MacBook Pro takes only 35 seconds for shutdown. I think is better than yesterdey, but is more than the 5 seconds that you described in the last post. Is 35 seconds a good time? In this 35 seconds, I only can see the background image, without icons and without the finder menu bar. After 35 seconds, Mac is off.
    How can I disable iDisk sync? I have a free mac Account, but is expired and then I can't use iDisk, only the name in iChat. But, is iDisk enabled?

  • Problem : SELECT from LTAP table takes much time (Sort in Database layer)

    Guys,
    Im having problem with this select statement. It takes much time just to get single record.
    The problem is with accessing the LTAP table and the ORDER BY DESCENDING statement.
    The objective of this select statement is to get the non blocked storage bin which is used by latest transfer order number.
    If the latest transfer order no storage bin is blocked, then it will loop and get the 2nd latest transfer order no's storage bin and
    checks whether it blocked or not. It will keep looping.
    The secondary index has been created but the it still taking much time (3 minutes for 10K records in LTAP)
    Secondary Indexes:
    a) LTAP_M ->MANDTLGNUM PQUIT MATNR
    b)LTAP_L  ->LGNUM PQUIT VLTYP VLPLA
    Below is the coding.
    ******************Start of DEVK9A14JW**************************
        SELECT ltaptanum ltapnlpla ltap~wdatu INTO (ltap-tanum, ltap-nlpla, ltap-wdatu)
              UP TO 1 ROWS
              FROM ltap INNER JOIN lagp                         "DEVK9A15OA
              ON lagplgnum =  ltaplgnum
              AND lagplgtyp =  ltapnltyp
              AND lagplgpla =  ltapnlpla
                WHERE lagp~skzue = ' '
                AND ltap~pquit = 'X'
                AND ltap~matnr = ls_9001_scrn-matnr
                AND ltap~lgort = ls_9001_scrn-to_lgort
                AND ltap~lgnum = ls_9001_scrn-lgnum
                AND ltap~nltyp = ls_9001_scrn-nltyp
          ORDER BY tanum DESCENDING.
         ENDSELECT.
        IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
          ls_9001_scrn-nlpla = ltap-nlpla.
          EXIT.
        ENDIF.
    ******************End of DEVK9A14JW**************************

    > Im having problem with this select statement. It takes much time just to get single record.
    This is not true. Together with the ORDER BY the UP TO 1 ROWS does not read 1 record but prepare all records, orders them and return one record, i.e. the largest in sort order.
    You must check what you need, either you need the largest record, then this can be your only possible solution.
    If you need only one recoird then the ORDER BY does not make sense.
    If you need the single largest record, then sometimes the aggregate function MAX can be an alternative.
    I did not look at the index support, this can always be a problem.
    Siegfried

  • Primavera Contract managment take much time when open large files.

    Dear All,
    i need to stop or configure the Download File In Chunks when PCM get file from sharepoint because it take large time to downlaod the file.
    the deafult is 2048 and i need to increase this value or disable it.
    thanks

    we start store attachment on 2007. all of these files are migrated to sharepoint 2010 now on the staging enviroment.
    but, we faced the performance issue as mentioned above.
    the large files (begin 5MB) take a lot of time to open through the PCM

  • Take much time to start

    When we start the laptop, it takes so much time to boot..

    Dear Customer,
    Welcome and Thank You for posting your query on HP Support Forum
    You can try the steps mentioned below:
    Step 01. Click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
    Step 02. Please type "temp" [Without Quotes] and press Enter
    Step 03. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
    Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
    Step 04. Again click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
    Step 05. Please type "%temp%" [Without Quotes] and press Enter
    Step 06. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
    Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
    Step 07. Click on the Start Button and Click on "Run"
    Step 08. Please type "prefetch"[Without Quotes] and press Enter
    Step 09. In the window which comes up, we need to delete all the files and folders
    Note: You cannot delete 2 or 3 files or folders, you can skip that
    Step 10. On your desktop, Please right click on "Recycle Bin" Icon and Click on Empty Recycle Bin.
    Click Yes if you get a prompt to delete everything permanently
    Step 10. Click on the Start Button and open the Control Panel
    Step 11. Please open "Programs and Features / Add or Remove Programs"
    Step 12. Please uninstall if you have any unwanted Softwares from here
    Note: If your Notebook prompts to reboot/restart when you uninstall, go ahead with it.
    Once your Notebook comes back please continue the troubleshooting again
    Step 13. Please Turn OFF the Notebook
    Step 14. Un-plug the Power/AC Adapter and also remove the battery too
    Step 15. Press and Hold the Power Button on the Notebook for a full minute
    Step 16. Now let's re-insert the battery back in and plug back the Power/AC Adapter
    Step 17. Start the Notebook and Now reset the Internet Explorer browser
    Hope this helps, for any further queries reply to the post and feel free to join us again
     **Click the White Thumbs Up Button on the right to say Thanks**
    Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.
    Thank You,
    K N R K
    Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP

  • Query output takes much time to download

    Hi Experts,
    I am running an query in SQ01 and getting output of 40000 row. The query execution is very faster but when I try to download the output to local file it take lot of time to download. Initially it was giving RUN TIME error then I increased the rdisp/max_wprun_time to 1200, now it is saving to the local file but takes 30 minutes.
    So, can anybody tell me if there is any way to resolve this issue?
    Note: The system performance is excellent and this is a QAS system
    Regards,
    Nilesh

    Hi,
    You can't really do much here, excpet trying to download the output in another format or maybe trying to split your query to fetch less no. of records.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Varun

  • My ipod takes much time to open

    hi , my name is omar ,,,i bought my ipod tuch 3rd generation 32 giga from like 2 months and i have updated to the new software but i found that it takes like 1 min to open ,,is it normall ???? ,,,,,when i bought it ,it was very fast ,anny help please

    I just measure that time on my 4G and it took 35-40 seconds. Your time seems comparable with my time. I myself would not be concerned.

  • Reinstalling mountain liom on macbook air 2012 takes much time?

    Is This normal? Im currently reinstalling os on my secondhand macbook air 2012. It will took almost 2 days. Will this be just fine? Letting the macbook turned on for 2 days? Does this wont overheat the macbook? Or damage its parts?
    Or this wont really take 44 hrs. Im also using the wifi connection, my normal download rate is 80-120 kbs/secs in when downloading in safari.
    Or what if ill cancel this and connect to another network connection but im also worrying if download stops.

    You need to be able to download just over 4 GB. If your connection speed is only 80-120 Kbps, that's quite slow and it will take a long time. Of course, it also may not take quite as long as it's predicting... Early time estimates in things like that can be quite inaccurate.
    You should be able to safely cancel and try on a faster network, or you could just leave it running. The latter will not cause the machine to overheat unless the machine has a hardware problem already.

  • Update query takes much time to execute

    Hi Experts,
    I need help regarding performance of the query.
    update TEST_TAB
    set fail=1, msg='HARD'
    where id in (
    select src.id from TEST_TAB src
    inner join TEST_TAB l_1 on src.email=l_1.email and l_1.database_id=335090 and l_1.msg='HARD' and l_1.fail=1
    inner join TEST_TAB l_2 on src.email=l_2.email and l_2.database_id=338310 and l_2.msg='HARD' and l_2.fail=1
    inner join TEST_TAB l_3 on src.email=l_3.email and l_3.database_id=338470 and l_3.msg='HARD' and l_3.fail=1
    where src.database_id=1111111;
    This query is running for too long, takes >1 hour and it updates 26000 records.
    But, if we run inner select query
    select src.id from TEST_TAB src
    inner join TEST_TAB l_1 on src.email=l_1.email and l_1.database_id=335090 and l_1.msg='HARD' and l_1.fail=1
    inner join TEST_TAB l_2 on src.email=l_2.email and l_2.database_id=338310 and l_2.msg='HARD' and l_2.fail=1
    inner join TEST_TAB l_3 on src.email=l_3.email and l_3.database_id=338470 and l_3.msg='HARD' and l_3.fail=1
    where src.database_id=1111111
    It takes <1 minute to execute.
    Please give me suggetions in the update query so that i will improve performance of the query.

    SELECT src.id FROM lead src
            inner join lead l_1 ON src.email=l_1.email AND
    l_1.database_id=335090 AND l_1.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_1.failed=1
            inner join lead l_2 ON src.email=l_2.email AND
    l_2.database_id=338310 AND l_2.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_2.failed=1
            inner join lead l_3 ON src.email=l_3.email AND
    l_3.database_id=338470 AND l_3.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_3.failed=1
        WHERE src.database_id=264170;
    Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
    SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS          1             10453                              
      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     1       32       27                              
        NESTED LOOPS          1       130       10453                              
          HASH JOIN          1       98       10426                              
            HASH JOIN          199       12 K     6950                              
              TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     202       6 K     3476                              
                INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
              TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     94 K     3 M     3473                              
                INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
            TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     202       6 K     3476                              
              INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
          INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_IDX_4     24             3   Update for one row.
         UPDATE lead SET failed=1, bounce_msg_t='HARD'
    WHERE id IN (SELECT src.id FROM lead src
    inner join lead l_1 ON src.email=l_1.email AND
    l_1.database_id=335090 AND l_1.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_1.failed=1
    inner join lead l_2 ON src.email=l_2.email AND
    l_2.database_id=338310 AND l_2.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_2.failed=1
    inner join lead l_3 ON src.email=l_3.email AND
    l_3.database_id=338470 AND l_3.bounce_msg_t='HARD' AND l_3.failed=1
    WHERE src.database_id=264170
         AND ROWNUM=1)
    Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
    UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=ALL_ROWS          1             10456                              
      UPDATE     LEAD                                               
        NESTED LOOPS          1       32       10456                              
          VIEW     VW_NSO_1     1       13       10453                              
            SORT UNIQUE          1       130                                    
              COUNT STOPKEY                                                    
                TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     1       32       27                              
                  NESTED LOOPS          1       130       10453                              
                    HASH JOIN          1       98       10426                              
                      HASH JOIN          199       12 K     6950                              
                        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     202       6 K     3476                              
                          INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
                        TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     94 K     3 M     3473                              
                          INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
                      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     202       6 K     3476                              
                        INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_DATABASE_FK_I     94 K           259                              
                    INDEX RANGE SCAN     LEAD_IDX_4     24             3                              
          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     LEAD     1       19       2                              
            INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     LEADS_PK     1             1 

  • Query takes too much time in fetching last records.

    Hi,
    I am using oracle 8.1 and trying to execute a SQL statement, it takes few minutes and display records.
    When trying to fetch all the records, it is fast up to some level and takes much time to fetch last record.
    Ex: If total records = 16336 , then it fetches records faster up to 16300 and takes app.500 sec to fetch last 36 records.
    Could you kindly let me know the reason.
    I have copied the explain plan below for your reference.Please let me know if anything is required.
    SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = RULE               4046     8     4048
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4046     8     4048
      NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4030     8     2952
       FILTER                         
        NESTED LOOPS OUTER                         
         NESTED LOOPS OUTER               4014     8     1728
          NESTED LOOPS               3998     8     936
           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_TAB     3966     8     440
            INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_1_IX     108     8     
           TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_TAB     4     30667     1901354
            INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     CUSTOMER_ORDER_LINE_PK     3     30667     
          TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_TAB     2     2000     198000
           INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_CONTENT_1_IDX     1     2000     
         TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_TAB     1     2000     222000
          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_CONS_PARCEL_PK          2000     
       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_TAB     1     2000     84000
        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     IFSAPP     CONSIGNMENT_PARCEL_PK          2000     
      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID     IFSAPP     PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_TAB     2     20     2740
       INDEX RANGE SCAN     IFSAPP     PWR_OBJECT_CONNECTION_IX1     1     20     Thanks.

    We are using PL/SQL Developer tool. The time what we have mentioned in the post is approximated time.
    Apologies for not mentioning these details in previous thread.Let it be approximate time but how did you arrive at that time? When a query fetches records how did you derived that one portion is fetched in x and the remaining in y time limit?
    I would suggest this could be some issue with PL/SQL Developer (Never used this tool by myself) But for performance testing i would suggest you to use SQL Plus. Thats the best tool to test performance.

  • Sometimes RSCRM ABAP program is taking much time

    Hi,
    I am working in SAP BW 3.1 system. We have one RSCRM Abap program to send the data to Data stage team.
    We kept this process in process chain. Some times it takes much time. If i cancel that job and repeat this process it will complete in few minutes.
    Please suggest me what would be the reason.
    Thanks

    You may want to take a look at the following OSS Notes:
    [OSS Note 605213 - RSCRM: Performance|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=605213]
    [OSS Note 989461 - RSCRM:code for improving performance in VALUES_READ|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=989461]
    [OSS Note 1137302 - RSCRM: Memory usage optimization|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1137302]

Maybe you are looking for

  • DVD drive failure on some DVD brands

    Hello, I've been using Taiou Yuden DVD-R's for a while on my late 2009 Mac mini (Pioneer DVD-RW DVRTS08). Now suddenly they fail to burn (Toast Titanium 11.1) with errors like: The drive reported an error: Sense Key = HARDWARE ERROR (or MEDIUM ERROR)

  • Why LR4.4 no longer works with Blurb?

    Hi, why LR4.4 no longer works with Blurb? If I configure a book and then click Submit to Blurb does not happen anymore. I even looked at the network traffic and it seems as if the IP is pinged to the contact record no longer respond. I do not underst

  • Send to Back in XPro

    A basic question I know... I've searched high and low and cannot find the "send to back" in XPro, so when I drop signatures etc on the document, the block out lines etc. 

  • When I sync my 3rd gen nano, there is no longer a games option tab. What happened?

    Every time I sync it, there's no longer any games option, and I can't figure out what happened. Anyone know how I can fix it? Should I just try to restore it?

  • Dock Plus Series 3, Mic doesn`t work

    As I use Skype a lot, I bought Dock Plus Series 3 to solve the issue with mic jack at Lenovo`s stupid engeneeres "designed" for t420s model. No one profesional pmanufacture produces mic for this kind of jack, and it is always Pain in the Ass to conne