Attachments in marketing documents not exposed via DI

Marketing Documents have now a new tab called "Attachments". The DI should expose the
functionality to "deal" with those attachments (e.g. Add, Update or Remove an attachment).
I created CRM 860084.
Kind Regards,
paolo

You can create new UDF, and then fill the value thru DI.

Similar Messages

Link between Service Call and Marketing documents not working

Hello all,
I found a field in Marketing Documents - Rows data - that should be the link between a Service Call and the Marketing Documents.
The field is for example "INV1.isSrvCall" but, even if I create an Invoice from the Service Call, the field will be populated with the value "N".
Dows anyone knows how to make this field work? Or any workarround to make the connection between a Service Call and the generated documents?
Thanks in advance,
Kind Regards

The problem with SCL4 is that SAP updates it way too late in the process to be meaningful while in the module. You create a service order, then go into the expense document. That is when we need to know the service call id and the internalsn of the equipment being worked on Only when you get out of the service module do SAP post to SCL4.
The data (before writing to SCL$) exists as a veriable on the original service form. But can we access it from the expense document?
The question is how to access the data (service id) on the original service form from an expense document within the servide module. It is the service form, and that is currently not in focus, so I do not know if you can access it as a varaible, while in the expense document (sales order or invoice) that is in focus.
Can any one help with this/
David

Recurring Marketing Documents not available

Although SBO contains recurring AP and AR documents, they are not available for most country localisations. This is a very common requirement in Australia
Regards
Jeff

Hi Jeffrey,
there are 2 ways with which to achieve recurring marketing documents:
1.) Use the 'Duplicate' functionality.
2.) Use the 'Document Draft' functionality.
Both can be used to easily work with recurring marketing documents.
All the best,
Kerstin

Numbers document not synchronized via iCloud

I am saving document from Numbers MacMini but it's not visible from iOS devices or via iCloud.com.
Instead I see the old version of the same document.
When I am opening it in MacMini I see it in iCloud area, but in iCloud.com it shows the old version

Ok. Fixed by moving the document from iCloud to Documents then moving it back to iCloud.

Multiple Profit Centers in Marketing Documents not supported by DI?

Hi,
Is there a way to do width DI API? Some "workaround"?
DI only show Documents.ProfitCenter and this is mapped to OcrCode in database. I need to set OcrCode2 and OcrCode3 in a delivery notes generated with DI.
Heelp!!
Thanks,
Ricardo Momm

You can create new UDF, and then fill the value thru DI.

Parked documents not extracting via 0FI_GL_4 DS

Hi,
     I am using 0FI_GL_4 DataSouce and its working fine but when I am extracting data I can't received any documents status (BKPF-BSTAT) like "A" Clear Documents, "V" Parked document etc.
    Any SPRO settings required? Any idea?
    Thanks in advance...

Hi,
A 'parked document' means that all entries pertaining to a specific transaction has been carried out - however, the same is not posted by the business user - a parked document needs to be invoked and then posted explicitly.
0FI_GL_4 will not be picking up any parked documents - however all cleared items will be necessarily picked up by the extractor - the extractor is based on BSIS / BSAS / BKPF / BSEG.
Hope this helps.
regards,
Pinaki

Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents

Hi,
Ship to party and Bill to party not reflecting in marketing documents inspite of defining it in BP Master data.why does it happen.we are on 8.8 version and this is happening in Livedatabase.
Thanks,
Mansoor Baig

Hi Mansoor,
Is this for new transactions or existing ones that went thru the 8.8 upgrade? Is this for new BP that the address doesn't show or existing (if you have other transactions with no address problem then it shouldn't be the address format setup unless something happened in the upgrade).
Heather

Excise duty tax code is not appearing in marketing documents.

Hi all,
I am not able to view BED+VAT tax code in Marketing documents.What will be the reason.
Kindly let me know if i am missing any setting.
Regards,
Vikram

My customer wants to view the excise tax codes in all the marketing documents.
Also check whether u ticked excisable tax code as expense ?
Can you please elaborate on this
kindly provide me if you have any documentation.
Regards,
Vikram

Printing marketing documents via DI API

Hello everybody?
I've been looking for some information about how to print marketing documents through DI API using the layout assigend in the PLD. Until now i have not found a way to do this, so I want to know if anyone has found a solution either using ALD?
I've seen some workaround using the DI API but it's not useful for me, so it's a definitive answer to say that it's not possible to do this?
Thanks

Hi,
When i had a similar requirement i used Crystal reports to preview and print my custom reports, I opened the Report on the Print Preview menu icon click.
Hope it helps,
Vasu Natari.

SJSAS 9.1 does not expose EJB 3.0 remote Interface via JNDI

I have successfully deployed a simple Stateful EJB 3.0 bean (CartBean, like the one in the Java EE 5 tutorial remote interface Cart) on SJSAS 9.1, located on machine host1.
After I deployed the CartBean, I browsed the SJSAS and noticed the existence of the following JNDI entries:
ejb/Cart
ejb/Cart__3_x_Internal_RemoteBusinessHome__
ejb/Cart#main.Cart
ejb/mgmt
ejb/myOtherEJB_2_x_bean ( +myOtherEJB_2_x_bean+ is a different 2.x bean that I have deployed as well)So, I am trying to access the remote interface of the CartBean from a remote machine, host2. The client application is a Java-standalone client.
I am using the Interoperable Naming Service syntax: corbaname:iiop:host1:3700#<JNDI name>
The problem is that the remote interface of the bean does NOT seem to be available via JNDI. I get the javax.naming.NameNotFoundException when I try to do a lookup like:
corbaname:iiop:host1:3700#ejb/Cart
On the other hand, the following lookups succeed:
corbaname:iiop:host1:3700#ejb/mgmt
corbaname:iiop:host1:3700#myOtherEJB_2_x_bean
and also the following succeeds:
corbaname:iiop:host1:3700#ejb/Cart__3_x_Internal_RemoteBusinessHome__So it seems like the Remote interface is not available via JNDI, rather only some internal SJSAS implementation (the object returned from the ejb/Cart__3_x_Internal_RemoteBusinessHome__ lookup is of type: com.sun.corba.se.impl.corba.CORBAObjectImpl
Why is this happening? I know there used to be a bug in Glassfish, but I thought it had been fixed since 2006.
Many thanks in advance, any help would be greatly appreciated.

The EJB 3.0 Remote Business references are not directly stored in CosNaming. EJB 3.0 Remote references do not have the cross-vendor interoperability requirements that the EJB 2.x Remote view had.
You can still access Remote EJB references from a different JVM as long as the client has access to SJSAS naming provider. Please see our EJB FAQ for more details :
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/javaee5/ejb/EJB_FAQ.html

While creating the UDF in the Marketing Document ERRor

Dear to ALL
Please give me some solution to the my problem
My problem is
While i am creating the UDF in the marketing document I am getting the error message 131-183 could not able to create the data base.
Any one can help me out releated to this problem
Please .....................................................
With regards to all ........................
Gopi J N
[email protected]
[email protected]

Hi JN,
There is no limit in number of UDF but in record length. This a SQL
Server 2000 limitation which establish 8060 bytes as maximum for a
record. This limitation does not exist in MSSQL 2005.
Therefore, in order to be able to add more UDFs you should reduce the
size of the existing UDFs or upgrade the system to MSSQL 2005.
Please refer to the SAP note 816387
The solution to this problem is to decrease the size of the
User Defined Fields. Either by decreasing the length or changing
the definition of "Alpahnumeric" fields to Text, or the last resort
is to remove the fields.
All these actions have to be done via the SAP Business One application.
The change of field type alphanumeric to Text might influence the
performance.

Behaviour of ESC key in Marketing Documents

Open a marketing document & add a Business Partner. Hit ESC key & receive pop up box "Do you wish
to save the changes" with the options Yes, No, Cancel. Hit Esc again & the box will close & the form
remains open
Hit ESC again & the box pops up again, Choose No & the form closes, which is the expected behaviour.
When you re-open the form & perform the same process, the first ESC pops up the box, but hitting SC
again appears to select NO instead of Cancel and the form closes
When you re-open the form & perform the same process, the first ESC pops up the box, but hitting SC
again appears to select NO instead of Cancel and the form closes.
Once they users have chosen NO once during their session, the default will always be NO even if
theyclose & re-open the forms.
The ESC button should always be the cancel operation.
This is annoying for our customers as they can hit ESC by accident & get the box then lose their work
when they hit the key again expecting it to cancel , not close

So the only way to allow SAP to perform automatic reconciliation is via the "Copy To" and "Copy From" button.
Are there any other exception even when we use these "Copy To" or "Copy From" buttons, and SAP does not perform automatic reconciliation?
Thank you!

Nature of reconciliation engine in marketing documents

Dear Experts,
Can someone explain to me the nature and behaviour of the partial reconcliation engine when processing marketing documents?
When will some documents be reconcliated? and when will some documents be left for manual reconciliation? Under any prerequisites, or conditions?
Please advice.
Much Thanks!
Chinho

So the only way to allow SAP to perform automatic reconciliation is via the "Copy To" and "Copy From" button.
Are there any other exception even when we use these "Copy To" or "Copy From" buttons, and SAP does not perform automatic reconciliation?
Thank you!

Image UDF on Marketing Documents for Signature

Hi,
I'm using SAP B1 2007A (PL48) with B1DE 1.4
SCENARIO:
For certain Marketing Document Forms (AR Invoice, Sales Order etc) , I need to capture a physical signature via an ePad and save the resulting jpeg with the Marketing Document.
I've created a UDF on the Marketing Documents Title of type Image.
I've added a button to the form (for example AR Invoice) which lets the user capture a signature and saves it to a file.
QUESTION:
How can I programatically load the saved jpg file to the Image UDF?
Please advise.

Hi Ben,
Unfortunately, because you are doing this on a system form it isn't easy. The PictureBox control is what you need to set the picture but I gave it a quick test and although I can create an instance of the PictureBox control and set it to an image UDF field, any value I set to the Picture property is not saved to the UDF.
An alternative approach:
1) Create a separate UDT. In this table you'll need columns for DocType and DocEntry (so you can link a record back to a marketing document) and an Image UDF.
2) Create a simple form that just has a PictureBox control on it. Bind the control to the image UDF on your table.
3) Add a button (in the form load event) to each of the marketing documents that need a signature.
4) Trap the event of the user clicking on the button in the marketing document form and open your new form. Use conditions in the DBDataSource to show the correct signature image.
To import the scanned image you'll need to do the following:
1) Copy the image file to the Pictures folder (as set in the General Settings path tab).
2) Add an entry to the UDT for the correct document type and entry. For the image UDF you should set just the image file name and not the full path.
Hope that all makes sense!
Kind Regards,
Owen

Acctg document not created for cancellation invoice

Hi all,
We have a vehicle sales order created with payment card. The SO contains one item for vehicle and one item for parts. The items were delivered and invoiced separately. Hence, SO has one vehicle sales invoice (VSI) and one parts sales invoice (PSI).
The standard procedure was to post VSI first before the PSI. Accounting documents have been created when both invoices were posted. However, there was a need to cancel the PSI. When this was done, cancellation invoice was created but there was no accounting document posted for the cancellation.
I tried simulating the scenario in our test server and cancelled VSI 90000081 first before cancelling PSI 90000082 to test if this can be an alternative solution. Cancellation for VSI was posted successfully but error persists for PSI cancellation.
Order 67 06/19/06 Completed
. Delivery 80000081 06/19/06 Being processed
.. Picking request 20060619 06/19/06 Completed
.. GD goods issue:delvy 4900000293 06/19/06 complete
.. Invoice 90000081 06/19/06 Completed
... Accounting document 2000077 06/19/06 partly cleared
.. Invoice cancellation 90000084 06/19/06 Completed
... Accounting document 2000079 06/19/06 partly cleared
. Delivery 80000082 06/19/06 Completed
.. Picking request 20060619 06/19/06 Completed
.. GD goods issue:delvy 4900000294 06/19/06 complete
.. Invoice 90000082 06/19/06 Completed
... Accounting document 2000078 06/19/06 Not cleared
.. Invoice cancellation 90000083 06/19/06
.. Invoice 90000085 06/20/06 Blocked
Accounting status of 90000083 (where error occurs) in VF03->Header->Details is set to K or <b>Accounting document not created (authorization lacking)</b>.
Any inputs? Thanks in advance.

Hello Sheila,
sorry - my first answer was in mistake - Status K means:
"The transaction is processed using payment cards. The order, however, does not contain valid authorization.
This problem occurs in billing documents for follow-up deliveries."
Could you check this ? Last way would be to set a breakpoint into the FM 'RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE'
and trigger this via VF02 -> Release to accounting.
Regards Wolfgang

Attachments in marketing documents not exposed via DI

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for