Audit on Match Approval Level - 2-Way, 3-Way...

Hi,
We have a requirement where user wants to audit any changes made to Match Approval Level field. If anyone changes 3-way to 2-way or 4-way to 3-way it should be tracked. Are there any audit tables for this?
Thanks
Sam

Hi Sam,
As this is a part of setup, so cannot track the history. Where as the same thing can be tracked at purchase order level. you can ask for customized report to your technical team and can identify the which match approval level has been used for that order.
Thanks & Regards
Ankur Dawra

Similar Messages

Database table of Match approval level data in shipment more tab

hi friends
i need to know the database database table of Match approval level data in shipment > more tab of PO.
pls help. its urgent.

Hi friends
Thank you all for reply. 2-Way, 3-Way or 4-Way values are coming against particular item according to the following combination of values in inspection_required_flag and receipt_required_flag column of PO_line_locations_all.
4-WAY :Inspection_required : Y , Receipt_required : Y
3-WAY :Inspection_required : N , Receipt_required : Y
2-WAY :Inspection_required : N , Receipt_required : N
it refers there is no fixed column in table based on which 2-Way, 3-Way or 4-Way values are coming for MATCH APPROVAL LEVEL field in that form. am i right? pls response.
One more thing, inspection_required_flag and receipt_required_flag columns are also available in mtl_system_items_b. My question is when a PO is created with any item which value combination is prioritized. i mean when i open Shipment form and go to More Tab, a value for MATCH APPROVAL LEVEL field is automatically set for that item. Where does that value come from? does it come from PO_line_locations_all or mtl_system_items_b ?
if my concept is not wrong it comes from mtl_system_items_b. after saving that PO the value is then stored in PO_line_locations_all.
if my concept is wrong in any way pls let me know. Thanks
Edited by: Lisan on Jul 15, 2009 9:45 AM

Query on Receipt Routing and Match Approval 4 way

Hi freinds,
I have a doubt here.We have a PO with a Shipment line with Match
Approval Level set as 4 way.Then by default the system would have reset
the Receipt routing to 'Inspection Required' with a prompt message also to the user about this.
But to my surprise,i found that the Receipt Routing has 'Standard Receipt' for that PO.
How come this would have been possible?
Regards,
Bala.

Jyoti,
My query is not on the defaulting ,but on the the Invoice Match approval .
If it is set to 4 way,by default it means that inspection is required and the system forces you to change the same to Inspection Reqd irrespective of whatever you say for Receipt routing.
You cannot save and proceed ,unless until you change the routing to inspection reqd in synchronisation with match approval of 4way.
So how has system allowed to go ahead with a value other than Inspection reqd.
Bala.

PO Matching Level change to 2-WAY depending on the PO Price

Hi
we have a requirement to change the PO Matching level depending on the Total price of the PO. Suppose if the PO total price is less than 5000$ we need to set the PO matching level to 2-WAY and for all other PO's the matchig level should be 3-WAY. In the purchasing options and system options matching level is set to 3-WAY.
Please let me know how to do
Thanks

Hi,
POs get created in Core Purchasing through the autocreate process. So, whether it is a PO generated from a Requisition created in iProcurement, or a manually entered PO, you should be able to achieve a solution through personalization of the PO form using the appropriate triggering event. Like I said, you may have to research this option a little bit more in detail.

Mass role Import in ERM "unable to determine matching org. level" Error

I am trying to upload the Derived Roles into the ERM. I have already uploaded all the Parents Roles. The volumes of the Derived Roles is huge in my SAP Backend system.
I am not able to understand what should be the content of Org File which we upload. Please correct if I am wrong
1>Example a role Z_TEST_D is derived from Z_TEST on the org levels EKGRP,KOART,GSBER,WERKS.
2>I have run Org Synchronization Job in the ERM
3>Downloaded Z_TEST (Parent Role) and uploaded it into ERM(It was easy because there was no org file)
4> Downloaded Z_TEST_D(Derived Role) through /VIRSA/RE_DNLDROLES Tcode in backend.
5>Downloaded the AGR_1252 information for this role which contained the Org levels and values
6>I put all those information into the Org File and then tried to upload it throws me the error Role Z_TEST_D : not imported; unable to determine matching org. level for WERKSin the system
So I again tried with the another method by changing the input sheet for the Org File
Z_TEST_D BUKRS 0* 9*
Z_TEST_D EKGRP *
Z_TEST_D KOART *
Z_TEST_D GSBER *
Z_TEST_D WERKS *
and tried to upload it again gave me the same error. I have checked the ERM all these Org Levels are fetched into the ERM. I am not sure if I am missing any basic things.
Current Support pack: SP10 Hot Fix 2.
Please share your experience and best practice to upload the roles,

Hello Rahul,
I had that same problem with SP10 also. The way I resolved itand this sounds crazywas to move that WERKS line up one or two rows.
The problem I noticed was not with all derived roles, but when there was a problem, it was always the last line of the Org file for the role that was causing the problem. And the problem was not always WERKS either.
If the next time you run it, the error occurs on the "new" last line (e.g. GSBER), move that line up also. Eventually they all make it in. I have not seen this problem repeated in SP12. Don't delete the line, just shift the order within the number of rows the role has.
P.S. I have several hundred derived roles, about 10 - 15% had this import problem.
-Dylan

ERM -- unable to determine matching org. level for BRGRU in the system

Hello,
I have a problem.
When I trY to import in the ERM (SAP GRC AC 5.3 SP5) a mass import of roles (derived roles) using the template Organizational Template.
Some of the roles gives me this error:
"Role not imported; unable to determine matching org. level for BRGRU in the system".
In the file I put for example
ZAPVAPINTE BUKRS 0083
Am I doing it right? or do I have to put $BURKS?
Best regards.
Pablo Mortera.

I have found that when you run the background job "syncronization of the organizational values" it pulls the org value name and all "values" assigned to it. If you don't have values specified (on the table level) for the org name, you get this error. We have many fields that we use values for these fields but they aren't specified in the table.
For example: We have the org value "PLVAR" with the values "AL", "01", "02", "03", and "GB" assigned to it. You can actually see these values in the backend system using SE11. We do not get this error on this org value. However, we have another org value "SACHZ" that we use, but we do not have any values assigned to it on the table level, so it is giving us this error. We are trying to find out how to populate the "values" field since this was not done through configuration.
Here are the steps: (1) Go to SE11 in your backend system. (2) Put your org value (example: PLVAR) in the "DATA TYPE" field and click display. (3) Double click on the Domain name. (4) Go to the Value Range Tab and click on the "Value Table" name if there is one. This is the table that has the org values assigned in it - normally done through configuration. (5) go to Utilities --> table contents --> display. (6) execute the table contents. These are the values that the sync job pulls over. If there are no values there or if there is no "values table" name, you get the error. If there are values there, you don't get it.
We are working with our technical team to get the values in these fields to see if that works. Another quick way to see if there are values assigned to the org field is to use "Org Value Mapping" in ERM. Select the "derived org level field" you want to see and click on the "org value from" magnifying glass. If no values are there, a "values table" hasn't been populated in SE11.
It doesn't make much sense to me though because we can still use values for these fields for our derived roles....we just don't populate the table with them.
I'll update this message if we find a solution.
Thanks,
Peggy

BADI/User exit for ME18 to specifically check for Approval Level...

Hi all,
I hope this is not a repost. I have found none so far in SDN forum. However if do, please point it to me. I will gladly close this thread.
Ok, i need a userexit/badi, whichever will do, to check for user approval levels in ME18.
So far I couldn't find a user exit/Badi that is suitable in my SAP system using SMOD and the program that find user exit by TCODE.
I hope SAP do provide a user exit that can actually check for user Approval Level in ME18.
Can anyone share this info on this issue?
Thanks,
William Wilstroth

There are few enhancement points available for ME18. Please check them once.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Approval Level in Process Controlled workflows

Hi Sap Gurus,
How can i find the number of approval levels in process controlled workflows for Shopping Cart, Purchase Order....
Thanks in advance

Hello,
IMG: SAP Implementation Guide > SAP Supplier Relationship Management > SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Business Workflow > Process-Controlled Workflow > Business Process Configuration > Define Process Levels
For concerned object type, select "Process Schema Definition" directory.
Then, select correct process level schema to display "Process Level Configuration" directory: here are the process levels defined.
Regards.
Laurent.

Setting approval level for credit management in SD

Dear Gurus,
I have a case like this:
My client would like to use credit management in SD. They have few approval levels for for credit limit release.
Exp: With SD has amount under from 1000$, Mr. A has the right to approve and release it
        With SD has amount bigger than 1000$, Mr. A have to release it and then Mr. B check again afterwards Mr. B can reject and release it up to his decision.
As I see in SAP, maybe there is only one level for check and after release the SO doesn't need other approve anymore. But I am still concerning about how to find or config to satisfy this requirement.
Thank for nice support!

In our case we have maintained a view named as "ZVW_OAR_WF_CTRL" which is created by our ABAPer.
The fields in this view are
   FIELD NAME                              DATA ELEMENT         TYPE         LENGTH
1) MANDT                                          MANDT                         CLNT             3
2)PROCESS                                      ZDE_WF_PROCESS      CHAR           2
3)KKBER                                           ZDE_KKBER                  CHAR          4
4)GRUPP_F                                       ZDE_GRUPP_CM_FROM CHAR         4
5)GRUPP_T                                       ZDE_GRUPP_CM_TO      CHAR         4
6)LEVELS                                         ZDE_WF_LEVEL              CHAR         5
7)VALUE_F                                       ZDE_NETWR_AK_FROM   CURR       15
8)VALUE_T                                       ZDE_NETWR_AK_TO         CURR       15
9)APPR                                            ZDE_PLANS                       NUMC      8
10)APPR_AD1                                  ZDE_PLANS1                    NUMC       8
11)APPR_AD2                                  ZDE_PLANS1                   NUMC        8
12)BOX_AC_APPR                           ZDE_AD_SMTPADR_BOX CHAR       241
13)BOX_AC_REJC                            ZDE_AD_SMTPADR_REJ   CHAR      241
14)NEXT_LEVEL                              ZDE_WF_LEVEL_NXT         CHAR       5
You can ask your ABAPer such that your view contains the above mentioned fields and in the the approvers you have to enter the "Pernr id" s of approver s which can be taken from HR people.

Approval Level

Hi all..
I want to get the Approver level...in my scenerio i have 3 levels of approver ...when the 3rd approver approves the workitem i want update some values..
i write the coding in the SAVI Badi it is working ... i am not able to get the approver level...i am having the workitem ID...
how can i get which level the approver is correponds to...??
Help me on this...
thanks..

Hi all...
i found the solution....
thanks..

BW-approval level of a purchase Order from MM module

Hi,
I have a query in BW.where do we place the approval level of a purchase order from MM module.
If any one cud help me with this doubt,thanks.

I am still in doubt,but will ask the question some time later.Thanks

Stat machine workflow task workflow status different values on different state activity(Approval level)

i have developed the State machine workflow in which i am using default workflow task
i have added one status dropdown and that is having approve or reject that i set using workflow task drop down values
now my requirement is that when my workflow goes to different approval i need to have different status values in dropdown
for example
on manager approval state activity i need to add additional status value forward to legal
but when it moved to next activity this task status field should show only approve and reject
in summary i need to have different status values for workflow task when it moved to different state activity(approval levels)
can we set these status field of task for state machine workflow programtically as well like for different approval level of task i need different status to be set for the dropdown of task status field
MCTS,ITIL

Hi Shahid Siddique,
I have seen a similar thread from you about this issue, create custom form for the seperate form is a considerable workaround, you can have a check whether it works.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9baa0c32-1cde-4c58-aa7c-3568ccf0cdc9/different-approval-level-of-task-i-need-different-status-to-be-set-for-the-dropdown-of-task-status?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
Thanks,
Qiao Wei
TechNet Community Support

Approver level 2 not receiving Workitem

Dear Forum contributors,
May I kindly ask you advice about the next situation?
     We have set up a WF process with 3 levels based on the SC amount.
     Requesters are able to change approvers determined by the system according to a custom criteria.
     The conflictive case goes as it follows:
o     Requester creates a SC. Three levels of approval are determined.
o     Requester changes approver level 1determined for another approver of the same level.
o     Requester changes approver level 2 determined for another approver of the same level.
o     SC is ordered.
o     Workitem goes into the approver level 1 inbox. Approver level 1 completes workitem.
o     Workitem goes into the approver level 2 inbox.
o     Approver level 2 is out of office for a long period, therefore requester enters into the SC and changes the approver level 2 for another one with the same level.
o     Work item is not going into the new approver level 2 inbox. Woritem only goes into the new approver inbox once the original one has completed the workitem.
Is this standard behavior?
Thanks in advance for your support,
Abraham

Hi,
There is a slight difference here.
WF is not being restarted. As I mentioned in the initial exposure, work item is not moving to the approver level 2 changed until the original approver level 2 has approved the work item( not the approver level 1).
u201CThe conflictive case goes as it follows:
o Requester creates a SC. Three levels of approval are determined.
o Requester changes approver level 1determined for another approver of the same level.
o Requester changes approver level 2 determined for another approver of the same level.
o SC is ordered.
o Workitem goes into the approver level 1 inbox. Approver level 1 completes workitem.
o Workitem goes into the approver level 2 inbox.
o Approver level 2 is out of office for a long period, therefore requester enters into the SC and changes the approver level 2 for another one with the same level.
o Work item is not going into the new approver level 2 inbox. Woritem only goes into the new approver inbox once the original one has completed the workitem.
Thanks for your feedback,
Abraham

OTL Multiple Approver Levels

In OTL while defining Approvers, We have defined HR Supervisor as Approver for Human Resources Applications. Now we want to set second approver level, which can be person/ or formula.
But when I defined another level with same Application it gives an error that I can not have two rows for same application. Then how can I implement above functionality using approval style

I guess you can achieve it using Entry Level Aprovals.
1. Define a empty Time category(TC1)..i.e. just select Dummy Element context, do not select any element name (its implied that Time category includes all elements)
2. In the Approval style scree, select Entry level approvals as the approval mechanism.
3. Click Entry Level approval fragments button
4. Define as follows
Row1=> TC1 - HR Supervisor - 1 (seq)
Row2=> TC1 - Person - <person name> - 2(seq)
I guess it should work

Dynamic Approval Levels In RFX

Hi,
I Have requirement i.e Approvers are determined on the basis of Purchasing Group. Approval Levels May Vary Depending Up on the Purchasing Group. I have seen lot of threads in this forum regarding this . BRF needs to be implemented for this . But iam new to this Concept . AnyOne please Gide Me in this regard
Edited by: sunil challapalli on Apr 12, 2010 8:05 AM

ev_type = 'B'.
ev_length = 1.
CLEAR ev_currency.
ev_output_length = 1.
ev_decimals = 0.
ev_value = abap_true. " no processing
ev_data_missing = 'X'.
get event object
lo_wf_brf_event ?= io_event.
get Context Container from BRF event
lo_context_provider = lo_wf_brf_event->get_context_provider( ).
CALL METHOD lo_context_provider->get_document
    IMPORTING
      ev_document_guid = lv_document_guid
      ev_document_type = lv_document_type.
CASE lv_document_type.
WHEN 'BUS2200'.
   ev_value = '3C_RQ_600_002'. """Process Schema Name
   CLEAR ev_data_missing.
WHEN OTHERS.
ENDCASE.
ENDFUNCTION.
For testing Purpose I hardcoded the Process schema..

Audit on Match Approval Level - 2-Way, 3-Way...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for