Authorization for order type and activity
Dear all,
is it possible to set the authorization in PS, that allow changes only for specific order types?
Scenario:
A user is allowed to display order type PS01.
But he is also allowed to create/change/display the order type PS02.
In transaction CN22 there is only the authorization object C_AFKO_AWK, which has the values for plant and order type, but the activity is missing. So if the user gets both order types and also transactions CN22 and CN23, he can change both order types.
Is there a solution for this problem?
Thank you!
Regards,
Stefan
I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects: 1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) 2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
- Are both these roles assigned to the same user? then your purpose is not solved, It is more or less like giving full authorization.
- One role should be
M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) for view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER. This should be assigned to one user
- Second role should be
M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZOFF and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = * for view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF. This role should be assigned to the second user.
Regards,
Subbu
Similar Messages
-
Authorization for material type and material views
Hello all,
I would need to restrict a user group, in creation (MM01) and modification of material master, based of type material and material views.
The authorization, for each user should be:
- view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER;
- view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF.
I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects:
1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B)
2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
but the effect is to be authorized, to all view for material type ZFER and ZOFF.
I have already updated the authorization group of the type materials (OMS2).
Is there a solution for this problem?
(component version SAP ECC 6.0)
Thanks.
Regards,
LucaI tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects: 1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) 2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
- Are both these roles assigned to the same user? then your purpose is not solved, It is more or less like giving full authorization.
- One role should be
M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) for view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER. This should be assigned to one user
- Second role should be
M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZOFF and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = * for view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF. This role should be assigned to the second user.
Regards,
Subbu -
Needed help in check for order type and subtransaction type in J1iin
Hello experts,
We have implemented a sub transaction type 'EN'(Excise Notification) for a particular customer only while creating excise invoice via J1IIN.
Now the system should only let the user to select the sub transaction type 'EN' when the billing document belongs to that particular customer or particular billing document range...
So how to achieve this functionality before creating excise invoice ?Please guide me
regards,
AbhayHi,
Please do the following configuration and check
Menu Path
IMG --> Logistics - General --> Logistics - General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Business Transactions --> Outgoing Excise Invoices --> Maintain Default Excise Groups and Series Groups
Assign desired Sub transaction type for the following combination :
Sales Org - Distribution Channel - Division - Shipping Point - Plant - Excise Group - Series Group - Sub transaction type.
Hope your issue gets resolved by this else revert.
Regards,
Tejas -
Hello Expert,
I have a problem with authorization in MDG-F.
I want to create Account with Collective processing. After, entered Entity type, Edition and Chart of account, Blocking message "Data model 0G: No authorization for entity type Account (Company Code) - activity Display" is displayed.
But, i checked in PFCG transaction, for this user profil, activity are : create or generate, Change and display. So, for me , it is correct.
Please, check screen shot below :
Blocking message :
and in PFCG transaction
Could you help me to solve this point?
Kind regards,
Heri RAOELISONHi Heri,
the system behavior is correct. The account in company code consists of three entity types:
1) COA - Chart of Accounts (Type 3)
2) ACCOUNT - Account (A-Segment, related to ECC table SKA1, Type 1)
3) ACCCCDET - Account in Company Code (B-Segment, releated to ECC table SKB1, Type 1).
3) includes 1) and 2) whereas 2) includes 1). If you grant authorization only for 3) but not for 1) and 2), you cannot do anything.
Best regards
Michael -
Accessing RSA1 issueYou have no authorization for basic types (activity 01)
We are experiencing the following issue with RSA1
While accessing this it comes back with error
You have no authorization for basic types (activity 01)
This was working before and no authorizations got changed. Appreciate your feedback.Hi,
This is realted to authorizaion problem. please contact your basis team.
Assign points if it helps.
Cheers,
Malli. -
Error :- No authorization for basic types (activity 01)
Hi Experts,
While trying something at the BW server i suddenly got the below error
I am getting the error when i am accessing the T-CODE RSA1.
Error :- You have no authorization for basic types (activity 01)
I checked the ids of my colleagues all are getting the same messages...
Regards,
RGHi,
1. Check in SU53 tcode
2. You are having RSECADMIN/PFCG tcode access?? If yes you can give authorisation for the same.
3. You dont have S_RS_ADMWB - authorisation
4. for your user id give this above authorisation
5. If you are unable to do the same, ask your basis team to give you the authorisation
refer this link- 1.http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/f3/291542e4b4df2ce10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
2.http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/a4/1be541f321c717e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Edited by: Asish Sahu on Apr 28, 2009 10:34 AM -
Disable the Item Availability Button based on Order type and Item category
Hi ,
My requirement is to disable the Item availability check button in VA01 based on the Order Type & Item category. Is there any user Exits/ Badi / FM available for this.
Thanks in advance.
Srinivas.Hi,
Although it is an old post I need to answer for people who search an answer to the same type of question. To hide a field
you can use transaction variant 'tcode:SHD0'. But it is not based on Order type and Item category. May be you can use
USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION form in user-exit MV45AFZZ. You can loop at screen and set screen-active = 0 in fields
where you want them to be inactive. -
Authorization for Document type in FB60.
Hello everybody,
On executing FB60 transaction code, i want to control the document type entry means
we have basically 2 types of document V1- Pune vendor bill and V2 Mumbai Vendor bill.
I have to give V1 document type authorization only for pune location user and V2 for Mumbai location user.
I had check the object in FB60 but I can't find the authorization object for document type.
I tried by creating test role name z:test and assign transaction FB60 in that role. when I assign this role to
test user he can post both the document type invoice.
So please suggest me how to give the authorization for the V1 and V2.
ThanksHello Ganesh!
I believe that authorizations object F_BKPF_BLA is what you're looking for. To use it, however, you will first need to define an authorization group for document type you want to protect. This is done in transaction OBA7; select the document type you want to protect, go into details view and define a value for "Authorization Group" field (this is freely defined, you can enter any value you want).
After you've done this, a check will be performed on auth. object F_BKPF_BLA with the authorization group value you defined for the document type and activity.
(I've never implemented this in our system, but I'm fairly certain that this will work.) -
There is a mismatch between order type and GL accountu201D.
Hello
Can any one help me to know why I am getting this error message.
Here I am giving the steps carried out.
Step1. Using transaction code: FB60 I have posted a vendor invoice to a Machinery account GL account against a internal order.
Step2. A down payment using transaction code FBA7. using a special indicator M to a bank account.
Step3. When I am trying to clear the open item (by selecting above both documents) for the vendor using transaction F-44 system is giving an error message u201CThere is a mismatch between order type and GL accountu201D. System is prompting to correct the down payment entry, where I dint use any Cost centre, internal order.
Checked the Internal order profile, AUC settlement profile etc and no able to find an error message.
Can any one explain me why this error is coming and what need to be check in order to rectify it.
Regards
RS.Hi It looks that the field status of the Order Type and GL Account field status is being mistmatching with each other. You can check the field status group given on GL Account and the fields status in Order Type.
-
Planned order to prod order----order type and prod version/ routing
Hi,
My client produces a material in three different locations. The process at all the locations is same. Each location has the set of same work centers. We have differentiated the workcenters at the three different locations by naming conventions. I am mainting three counters in the routing with different set of work centers.
We want different order types for the production orders processed at these three locations. Also I should be in a position to select the routing/ production version manually for the production orders processed at the three different locations. When I am creating a production order manually, I can select the order type and even the routing or production version.
But here I am converting the planned order to production order. The system is picking the order type as maintained in OPPE. In OPL8 I maintained manual selection of prod version. But version 1 is selected default by the system. Can I have any control over the selection of order type and prod version/ routing?
Thanks and Regards,
RaghuDear,
Selection of production version is only possible at manual creation of production order, but not when converting planned order to production order. you can manually change the production version if u want to in the planned order.When you have a planned order it would default contain a valid production version. So system would just take the Production version in the planned order to use the same in Production order. If you want to change the production version in production order then go to CO02-FunctionRead PP Master data and change it.
(Goto OPL8 and select Manual Selection of Production Order in Production Version field
And in MRP4 view of material master select - Selection only by production version as the option for the Selection method field )
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
Order Reason ABC not defined for Order Type Retrun order
Hi
I am getting following " Message no. V1 899 " when i am doing return order without refernce .
Order reason is defined in customization but still we are getting the following message " Message no. V1 899 " /Order Reason E18 not defined for Order Type ZEF9.
Can any one help me
regards,
kiranHi Kiran
As you have created sales order with document type ZEF9 but you have not taken any reference document then go to VOV8 and select ZEF9 and maintain the order reason feild and then do the process
Regards
Srinath -
Assign ext material proc profile to order type and plant
Hi friends ,
I want to make purchasing group and purch organisation fields non editable for external material procurement.how can i do it.
REgards
AM
Edited by: Amehra on Jul 4, 2011 8:26 AMHi Mahesh ,
I am not able to use it properly.
I entered the tcode selected the field Purch Org
clicked on button influencing
Two fields are displayed : item category and order type
Selected Order type and then clicked influencing .
Entered order type in Contents field and pressed enter
But all the fields are in input form only.
But when i go to order type there the Purchasing org field for material proc. is non editable
but for the service proc its editable.
I want to make it editable for material proc also.
Regards
Achal -
Early batch opening for order item is activated in the QM data settings
Hi Team
I am not able to generate inspection lot inspite maintaining 04 inspection type in QM view.
Getting this message - ( Make sure that an inspection type for inspection lot origin (03) or for inspection lot origin 04 with
early batch opening for order item is activated in the QM inspection data. )
Please suggest me required settings.
ThanksHi
Go to MM02 select the QM view
Clcik the inspection setup button
Select the inspection type 04 detail icon in right corner.
in that screen Control insLot field select the Y Early lot creation for the order item.
Save
Thanks
S.Murali -
Cannot find GR Slip output type in Outbound Delivery for Order type KA
Hi Experts,
We need to ,setup output type for GR Slip. for a delivery created for Order Type KA
I am not able to find the Output Type in VL02N- Output (at item level).
I have alreday created conition record in VV21 against the sales Org for output type WABS
Please let me know if I am missing some thing
pls help
Regards,
ShettyHi
Does the output type exist in the output procedure ? If yes, is there a requirement assigned to the output type and is this fulfilled ?
Kind Regards
Torben -
Order types, why do we need to create our order types and not use the stand
HI
Order types, why do we need to create our order types and not use the standard ones during implementation.Hi Raj,
Well there is no hard and fast rule that you have to copy nad create a new order type. Its just to meet our own requirements that we copy the standard and make the changes if required to meet our business needs.
And by this way we keep unchanged the standard order type for further use.
If you are sure that the standard order type satisfies your need you can directly use that only.
I hope this clarifies the issue.
Do reward if find useful
Regards,
Abhi
Maybe you are looking for
-
Smart Album : Inconsistency in the Date Type format used inside Aperture ?
Hello, After using Aperture 2.0 for some days, I tried to create a Smart Album using as creation option for the Album the Date + "is in the Range" option which is leaving two blank fields for filling the two dates which are supposed to be the date li
-
How can I get an iMessage icon on my iPad2 screen?
How can I get an iMessage icon on my iPad2screen?
-
Optimistic Locking - Possible bug with Weblogic
After extensive testing of a j2ee application Im involved with, it would appear their exists a problem with using Weblogic's Optimistic Concurrency (OL) mechanism. The exact problem is as follows: The ejbCreate and ejbRemove methods of a particular e
-
How to find ipod touch with find my ipod
My daughter has misplaced her ipod touch somewhere in the house how do i activate find my ipod?
-
How to access CRM 2015 On-Premise from Azure web application
hi, I have deployed a MVC Application on Microsoft Azure. I was wondering Is it possible to access(read and write records like we do normally in local deployment) CRM On-Premise from Cloud or Do CRM 2015 should be IFD deployed? Any pointers will be