Authorization issue after technical upgrade

We just completed an uprade to BI 7.0 SP 15.  We only want to complete a technical upgrade and use the old security model.
We have found that when users run queries against multi-providers they aren't authorized.  BEX states that the user doesnt have access.
Should our old authorizations work with the old model against multi-providers?

In theory yes ..
Some Analysis ..
from the S_RS_COMP
goto RSECADMIN >Analysis>Execution as User -->enter the user name you are executing the query
Check box -->with Log option
select RSRT option
hit start transaction button ,it should show you the authoriztion errors with authorization objects missed.
if not
again RSECADMIN>Analysis>Error Logs-->check with the latest time stamp for that particular user and analyse the authorization issues
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP

Similar Messages

  • Authorization issue after the Support packs upgrade

    We're having problem on authorization issue after the SP upgrade.
    One issue if "You are not authorized to call up line item display" using FCH1 and FS10N tcodes.
    And the SU53 showing problem on S_TCODE FAGLL03.
    How are we going to solve this issue? We dont want to add this missing auth object on all our finance roles.
    Thank you in advance.

    How can i send you the trace file? What is your email address?
    If I were you, I won't do that. Did you not ever sign some confidentiality agreement? I wonder.
    Anyhoo... (copy right @ David)
    What are the objects been caught in category RC=4, RC=12?
    Relate them with functional aspect of the transaction (error screen)
    Edited : You can paste RC=4, RC=12 objects here without customer specific value if you want to.
    Regards,
    Arpan Paik
    Edited by: P Arpan on Aug 23, 2011 2:36 PM

  • Performance Issues after an Upgrade

    Hello!
    We are experiencing performance issues after we upgraded to a new version of Hyperion (11.1.2.1). At this point, I am not too sure about the actual causes for this degrade in performance but I am trying to narrow down the causes and need your inputs. Please help me with your ideas.
    1) What could be the causes/factors for the performance to degrade after an upgrade?
    2) Does the performance of a script depend on the user credentials i.e. who is launching the script? Whether it’s the super admin of the application/application owner or an application specific admin?
    3) Does the performance of the scripts depend on the place you are launching it from? For example - will the performance differ if it’s launched from MaxL Vs EAS?
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Thanks,
    - Krrish

    There are a number of bugs 12600557, 12675485, 12669814, 12698488 logged in for 11.1.2.1 - If you use Internet Explorer 8 and have data forms designed to use a large number of sparse dimension members in rows or columns, you may experience performance degradation when opening the data forms.
    This has been fixed in Oracle Hyperion Planning, Fusion Edition Release 11.1.2.1 Patch Set Update (PSU): 11.1.2.1.101 which is available on My Oracle Support as Patch 12666861.
    HTH-
    Jasmine.

  • Performance issues after iOS4 upgrade

    hello everyone,
    I had notices few issues after I upgraded my iPhone 3GS:
    1- The screen is not rotating (when reading e-mails of flipping photoes).
    2- The resolustion has decreased big time after the upgrade. Now the photos are shown in less resolution and they look hazy.
    3- my Ipod is not working.
    4- I could not restore my device via the itune.
    my big question is there a real tangible benifit for this new upgrade?
    I really appreciate if you can help me soon
    thanks.

    There are a number of bugs 12600557, 12675485, 12669814, 12698488 logged in for 11.1.2.1 - If you use Internet Explorer 8 and have data forms designed to use a large number of sparse dimension members in rows or columns, you may experience performance degradation when opening the data forms.
    This has been fixed in Oracle Hyperion Planning, Fusion Edition Release 11.1.2.1 Patch Set Update (PSU): 11.1.2.1.101 which is available on My Oracle Support as Patch 12666861.
    HTH-
    Jasmine.

  • Reporting authorization issue after BI 701 05 EHP1 upgrade

    Hello,
    We have recently upgraded our BI 7.0 to BI 701 EHP1 with 05 patch level. After this we had a problem with reporting authorizations for a report (query), which has created under Virtual Infoprovider.
    Earlier the report use to be execute perfectly with authorizations S_RS_ICUBE object with Act 03, Subobject DATA, but after upgrade to EHP1, while executing report its throwing a error pasted below.
    =============================================================================================
    "Diagnosis
    Errors occured while reading a VirtualProvider outside the BI system. Check whether the previous error messages contains any information about the possible cause of this error.
    It is possible that the error message can not be displayed because the error message class does not exist in the BI system. If this is the case, only the name of the error class and the message number are displayed. View the error class in the source system of the VirtualProvider.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Since the error is not necessarily in the BI system, there is no specific procedure for resolving it. With VirtualProviders, problems often occure with the connection to the system; these can lead to system termination. If the code for the VirtualProvider is not from the SAP, contact the relevant person to help resolve the issue.
    If an SQL error is listed in the previous message, see the procedure for SQL errors."
    ===============================================================================================
    After running st01 trace we identified the missing authorization is S_RS_ICUBE with Act 03, subobject DEFINATION.
    Here please tell why is the subobject check is performed to execute a report (query), as this is happening after EHP1 upgrade, so let me know if anyone had any clue on this ...
    Thanks

    Hi Martin,
    Thanks for reply.
    The assumption what you made are correct, but these are the possible reasons only. Is there any specific note or any info from sap that these changes came due to the new release change, so that i can tell my manager clearly.
    And I am not sure whether this is impacting the reports which using the VirtualProviders (Virtual CUBE) in place. If you could get bit more information that will be helpful...Thanks in advance.
    Sridhar

  • Authorization issue after upgrade

    Hi Everyone,
    We just upgraded from BI 3.5 to BI 7 last week.
    At the moment, there is an issue with Information Broadcaster now, all the information broadcaster settings are created by different business units general account  (Eg. BW_unitA, BW_unitB, each account only has access to their own workbooks).
    All IB settings are scheduled by BW analysts, some are run by process chain.
    After upgrade, most of IB jobs get error message in transaction code "RSRD_LOG": No authorization to scheduling workbook for user BW_unitA.
    Any suggestions welcome!
    Feng

    After upgrade, the authorizations will change or upgrade to 7.0 Authorization concept.
    Go to SU25 and generate the authorizations. sometimes, the authorizations would add in excess or it would be low after the upgade.
    So please check the roles and other authorizations which are assigned to the end users with the roles matrices that you designed,.
    Hope this would help you.

  • Issues during technical upgrade from  version 4.6C to ECC 6.0

    Dear All,
    We have done a technical upgrade from version 4.6C to ECC 6.0 and encountered following issues -
    In the t-code ABZE (acquisition with in house production) there is a check-box for reversal posting on screen with version 4.6C. However, this field is missing in ECC 6.0. Why so?
    In the report s_alr_87012327, there is a field "only with creation block" in version 4.6C. However, this field is missing in ECC 6.0. Why so?
    Request to kindly suggest the alternative to carry out the same in ECC 6.0.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Dhawal

    Hi Akshya,
    Please find answers below.
    1) 4.6c is NON-UNICODE system, Can I upgrade it into ECC 6.0 UNICODE system?
    Yes you can.
    If you are on a single code page system then you can give a gap between your uprade and unicode conversion. There is no problem with the singlecode upgrade and conversion.
    But if your system is MDMP then you will have to do the CUUC method that is both upgrade and unicode conversion together. Though you can give a gap and sign an disclaimer with SAP it is still not recomended way.
    2) 4.6c does not have any ITS system installed. If we upgrade it to ECC6.0 ABAP only, then Can I activate WAS internal ITS?
    Yes you can activate it.
    3) 4.6c does not have any JAVA stack. When I upgrade it to ECC 6.0, can I upgrade it to dual stack (ABAP+JAVA)? If yes, then how?
    After the upgrade and unicode conversion you can install the java stack.
    Regards,
    Ravi.

  • SAP Query selection screen issues after ECC upgrade

    Hi all
    We have a custom query created and assigned to a custom transaction code, which after upgrade to ECC 6.0 we find that the selection screen layout is different from what was available in 4.6C system.
    All the fields required are available.
    However, the sequence of the fields on the screen is different from the 4.6C after the upgrade.
    Can anyone help identify the issue so that the issue can be resolved?
    Thanks
    Vinodh S

    Hi N_niki
    There is no resolution as such.
    We had raised a Customer message with SAP and were informed that this was expected as the procedure to execute the reports was changed in ECC when compared to 4.6 (technical changes) and hence this issue shall remain for some queries wherein the old changes need to be brought back using an option in the SAP Query.
    Please refer to SAP Note # 723577 which could provide a better explanation for the issue.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Vinodh Sudhakaran

  • Authroization issue after the Upgrade for Multiprovider

    Hello Experts,
    After the upgrade has carried out in my Quality system, I'm unable to execute a query because of the authorization issue with Multiprovider. But earlier the same Authorization was assigned to the ID.
    The Role in Q and the Role in P is same. Right now P is with 3.1 and Q is with BI7.
    In both the system I have the same Role. But in Q it says that: Error You have no Authorization for Multiprovider XXXX
    This is happening for only one Multiprovider in Quality system. There is no change in the Multiprovider from earlier structure to the present structure.
    Can anyone give me any idea as to how to solve this issue?
    Many thanks in Advance..
    Thanks
    Raman..

    Hi,
    Look at this link:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a07122ae-8216-2a10-c9a5-996717a0648b
    Hope it helps

  • IPhone syncing issues after iTunes upgrade

    Hi
    I just upgraded to iTunes 8.1.1 for Mac. During the install I got a kernel panic and had to restart. iTunes seems to be installed fine. When I connect my iPhone I get messages like "some content will not be copied to the iPhone as this computer is not authorized" or such like. So now several apps, videos and music has been wiped from the iPhone.
    I tried authorizing the computer but I just get "This computer is already authorized".
    there does not seem to be any particular link between the erased content. Some was purchased on the Mac and some on the iPhone, all from the iTunes store. Before I updated iTunes everything synced fine.
    I can d/l the apps again direct to the iPhone but I can't find a way to get the missing music and videos back on the iPhone. Very annoying.
    Would re-installing iTunes help?
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Chris

    Hi Chris,
    Try highlighting the one of the songs that will not sync in iTunes> cilck File> Get Info, check the account name and verifying you are authorizing the computer with correct account.
    If the issue persists, try removing the SC Info folder as shown here: http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1389
    If you still see the issue after removing the SC Info folder, try reinstalling iTunes as shown here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1224
    -Jason

  • Issue after solman Upgrade

    Dears,
    We were using solman 7.0, connected to ECC 5.0 server.
    We configured all activities EWA,System Monitoring and all were working fine.
    Now we upgraded solman to 7.01(EHP1) and R/3 to ECC 6.04 .
    1 - My first concern is after upgradation it should automatically pick details but is is still showing ECC5 in product version.
         We performed Read data from remote system also but still same issue.
    2 - When I go to EWA or system Monitoring I only find Prd server there while in solution's logical component all dev,qas and prd servers are available.Earlier before upgrading it was showing all systems in EWA and system Monitoring.
    Please suggest.
    Shivam

    Hello Shivam
    For point #2 please look closely at the solution containing the systsem and make sure that 1) The Dev, QAS systems are included, and are highlighted greeen ( Meaning they are status "Put in Solution"). It sounds a lot like this setting is not done, therefore the systems would not show when you would try and use that solution in functions like EWA, BPMON, etc.
    It sounds very much like when you create a new soltuion with PRD, QAS, DEV systems assigned, but only the PRD system is "Put in Solution" by default, so you explicitly need to right click the system in change/edit mode, and select "Put in Solution", then save.
    Now why this might be the case after the upgrade, I don't have an answer, but it is worth having a check as the symptom fits this issue. I would advise you check the solution itself and ensure the DEV and QAS systems and in status "Put in Solution".
    Hope this information is helpful.
    Regards,,
    Paul

  • IP Phone 7921 / 7925 roaming issues after WLC upgrade from Version 7.2 to 7.3 and / or 7.4

    Hi,
    We have a customer which is using a Cisco WLC 5508 and 3502I APs. As he used the 7.2.103 release, There were no issues with VoWLAN. Now he needed new APs and ordered the 2602I. To use them he needed to upgrade the WLC to a 7.3 or later release. After the upgrade, he now encounters problems while roaming with the phones. The phones were tested with FW 1.4.1, 1.4.2 and 1.4.3.
    Configuration is set according to wireless voice design guides (VoWLAN DG 4.1, 7921 Deployment Guide). A Cisco TAC is also in progress, but they seem to be uncertain whether it is a wireless or CUCM issue, but I don't see a reason why it should be the CUCM when the only thing changed is the WLC Software Version.
    Is there anybody who is aware of such issues and can offer help?
    Thank you in advance.
    Best regards,
    Patrick

    Hi,
    we had a TAC ticket open with this customer and after some time, the TAC gave us the advise to use this release and the problems are now solved.
    So for others having the same issue: If you only need to support the 2600 APs, stay with the latest 7.2 release as there are some issues with the 7.3 and 7.4 release. If the customer requires HA, AVC or any of the new features + wireless voice, be very careful as it seems that the newer releases are having problems with that. I hope that Cisco will fix this very soon.
    regards,
    Patrick

  • Web dynpro ABAP- small issue after EHC1 upgrade

    Hi All,
    We have a Web dynpro ABAP report and it was working fine before the EHC1 upgrade. After the upgrade we noticed that the row count in ALV greed was disappeared.
    The report used to show 25 records per page and we were able to jump to the other pages by clicking on row count that was placed right below the report. Now report shows all the records and we only have scroll down option.
    Any idea where to look/ how to fix this issue?
    Regards,
    Mike

    In addition to applying that note, you also must deactivate Lightspeed rendering.  To me that's too extreme of a thing to do just to get paginators.  You loose the huge rendering performance improvements and it also means you can't use any of the new UI elements from 7.01.

  • Performance issue after PT Upgrade.

    Hakan and Team ,
    We recently moved from PT 8.48 TO PT8.51.18 on CRM 8.8 Application.
    After the upgrade, we tremendously saw big performance issues with PeopleSoft CRM Application. It freezes almost every day and all their work-force (call center representatives) go idle. It significantly impacts their productivity and eventually losing revenue.
    can you please suggest few suggestion or DOC that will help us to improve performance on application and DB side.
    Deatils :-
    SQL SERVER 2005
    Windows 2008 R2

    Hi,
    Performance is always a difficult one to tackle.
    It can be at so many levels, DB, Appserver, Webserver, CPU, RAM, Infra, etc.
    At OOW2012, David Kurtz gave a great highly detailed presentation on this subject: CON9210 - Performance Tuning for PeopleSoft Administrators
    http://www.myexpospace.com/oracle2012/smupload/scloader.cfm?SCID=257daa92-a6e8-411a-9806-2c22e56687d3
    See if you can apply some of the keypoints from his presentation.
    Regards,
    Hakan

  • Permissions issue after Mavericks upgrade

    I have just updated an early 2008 IMac with OSX Mavericks.
    All software running fine, but I noticed occassionally I was getting an authentication prompt on some files, didn't follow, but simply authenticated as and when I need to, I assumed it was when I moved files from my Mac Pro to my Imac.
    Having run the upgrade however, I get an error message to contact the vendor (Battlefront) as my copy of Combat Mission Battle for Normandy has lost its license.
    After the upgrade I had also purchased from the same vendor Combat Mission Fortress Italy. Having downloaded this and gone to run after copying to applications, this software gives me an error message saying unknown developer so I have got no where near installing a license.
    Having contacted the vendor and tried to get a work around, I am now getting the message it is you Mac not our software, despite the fact that all my other software is working fine (and the fact that the Combat Mission Battle for Normandy game worked fine until the upgrade).
    I do feel some sympathy for them, I do think the Mac has some sort of permission issue - I also probably compounded this by deleting a user which I did not recognise called 'wheel' which I suspect now is some form of default permisison.
    Anyone got any ideas, how do I 'reset' the system - I have tried fixing the permissions through disk utility.
    My vendor got me to run a sudo command through Terminal, but I got the message...
    sudo: unable to stat /etc/sudoers: Permission denied
    sudo: no valid sudoers sources found, quitting

    Update Saturday Jan 4, 2014
    Before my Mavericks upgrade on my Mac Pro, no problems ever (use my Mac 4-8 hours a day) using my Bose Companion 5 USB connected speakers. I've tried shutting the Mac down and plugging the Bose USB cable into another open USB port = no joy and other combinations. I tested the same Bose Companion 5 USB speakers on two other laptops with NO issues (ouch...they were running Windows 7) I have deleted the two .plist files, did the CMD+OPT+P+R reset, etc... = no change. Looked into Midi Audio Setup and did not see anything in there to change even though I tried a couple of things and no avail (there was no Garageband setting/entry).
    I still get a solid "BEEEEEEEEP" sound every 20+ seconds, when the sounds tries to toggle, by itself, between the Bose USB Audio device and the Internal Speakers.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error message that Firefox version 5.0 or later is vulnerable to phishing but I am running Firefox 16.0

    I get a small box that comes up each time I enter Firefox saying that Firefox 5.0 is vulnerable to phishing and other threats. I am not sure where this message comes from. I have Norton software on the my computer. The box further asks me to update m

  • Skype for Business upgrade plan

    Does anyone has any information about the upgrade path for "Skype for business" from Lync 2013 enterprise Servers ? Regards, Pushkal MishrA, This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights. I request you to test the solution

  • How adutilities comes to know that the file system is shared file system

    How adutilities comes to know that the file system is shared file system ? In multinode shared file system : if we want genearte message file we can invoke adadmin from any node and perform this activity. In this case, how adadmin knows that the file

  • Network design

    Hi all, can anyone help me with my design, we have a core router at head office and lots of 3550 switches, we have a remote office that connects via a les 100 circuit, basically out core router already has lots of secondary addresses so I was thinkin

  • Remove assignment of profit centers to company codes

    Dear all, I have to remove assignment of profit centers to company codes, we have about 300 profit centers which need to be corrected, is there any easier way to correct the profit center master data other than manually uncheck the assignment using K